Added: 2 years ago
From: zanta24
Views: 79,204
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i would like to know what are you useing as ammo

  • @billzball .5" x .5" x 1" block of aluminum with a U cut out of the back. This is a pic of a projectile after a shot (didn't hit head-on)

    flickr.com/photos/rp181/438298­2845/in/photostream

  • @zanta24 URL not working...

    flickr.com/photos/rp181/page3/

  • How much voltage does this thing take? Also, how long does it take to charge, if any time at all?

  • Wat? Did I get the definition of railgun wrong, or am I missing something?

    I thought a railgun was recoiless. I didn't know Newton's Third applied to this case.

  • @bf2lover42 newtons third law applies everywhere, that's why it's a "law". A railgun accelerates the projectile by the Lorentz force, but the principle that the gun receives an equal push backwards as the projectile forwards always applies. Think of two magnets pushing each-other apart -- it's the same thing.

  • @bf2lover42 newtons third law applies everywhere, that's why it's a "law". A railgun accelerates the projectile by the Lorentz force, but the principle that the gun receives an equal push backwards as the projectile forwards always applies. Think of two magnets pushing each-other apart -- it's the same thing.

  • @whoppix Yes, you are correct. It's like a person and the Earth. If the railgun's mass was large enough, it would be almost recoilless.

  • @bf2lover42 a railgun has far less recoil than a combustion-operated gun with the same projectile energy. However, accelerating the projectile forwards still accelerates the gun backwards. The big difference is that with conventional firearm, hot gasses continue to be propelled out the barrel long after the projectile, and those escaping gasses are the largest source of recoil.

  • i cant wait for our military to make shoulder fired rail guns >:3

  • @ThorsDiciple dont hope for it to come soon, as at the moment these things need massive powersources

  • @JustSomeRandomNewb

    they will always need massive amount of energy, there is just alot of energy needed to fire a projectile of multiple Kg at a speed 8 times that of sound

  • Can this be fired more than once, or did the projectile destroy the gun?

  • @wii2050 Yes, it is reusable

  • @wii2050 Yes, reusable. The projectile is not, and the rails need to be replaced every few shots.

  • @zanta24 I allways wondered if using a liquid projectile might increase the lifespan of the rails. For example liquit mercury is both toxic and more dense than steel. Which I would think would make it an exceptionally good projectile for military applications. However, I wonder if it would scatter too much upon exiting the barrel to make it effective. Or if it would be too expensive a material to warrent it's use.

  • @MrAwsome514 That's kinda along the lines of a weapon in Mass Effect called a Magnetic-Hydrodynamic Weapon that shoots liquid iron-uranium-tungsten alloy that's shaped into an armor piercing shot. Now obviously alot of that while thoreticly possible not all that practical. what you may be able to do is if you could make a kind of magnetic rod that when diped in Mercrury would hold it like a magnet holds metel shavings, that may work and hold the projectile togher or at lease act as a buffer.

  • @MrAwsome514 And it also would only be useful if the military had chosen the scorched earth policy, because it is extremely toxic to wildlife and stuff.

  • @goliathlup1 Liquid mercury is however gallium is a nontoxic alternative. It is another metal that is liquid at room temperature.

  • @MrAwsome514

    Omg

  • @goliathlup1

    Pave 'em to Save 'em

    (baloney)

  • @MrAwsome514 How would a liquid projectile work. A) it would BOIL and B) there is this thing called air resistance that would force so much force the mercury would ATOMIZE.

  • @xWOMBOCOMBOx Well we don't really know till we shoot it now do we?

  • @MrAwsome514 xWOMBOCOMBOx is right, and no we don't need to shoot it to know. There are also two other problems: one, mercury isn't a ferromagnetic substance so how would you propose the rails would act upon the mercury? Asking nicely? If you put it in something that is ferromagnetic, you're right back where you started. Second, even a ferromagnetic liquid wouldn't work, because the liquid would be attracted to the magnetic rails and coat them. It needs to be a solid that keeps it's shape.

  • @Dallasdeckard You are not very familliar with how railguns function are you? Tell me how do the aluminum projectiles work then because they are not ferromagnetic either... The projectile is nothing more than a conductor. Is is the electromagnetic field around it that is acted on. Any suffeciently conductive material can be fired. Though you may be right that a ferromagnetic liquid might not work... I don't know how conductive ferrofluid is.

  • Check his other vids for that

  • so, um... any technical details? schematics? photos of the gun?

    would be cool.

  • That looks awesome!!!

  • No sound, had a loud generator running in the background.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more