lol wearing that for another six or seven years. Even though Vista had a short shelf life, it's still technically true because Windows 7 is pretty much the same as Vista.
@Generalkidd I love the way Vista looks, but Ambiance is seriously the best theme I ever seen in my life. Gonna stick with that for 2 million years : P
@rinkavideos64 It's been 6 years since the release of Windows Vista. I have yet to see any Linux themes that look better than Aero in my opinion. I know KDE also has transparency effects like Aero, but overall, KDE Plasma Desktop still just doesn't give you the same impression as Aero. This is all my opinion of course.
@Generalkidd Spinning cubes. Coverflow switcher. Wobbly windows. Genie effect. Cool magnifier. Ambiance. Live previews (download Compiz nightly to see them on minimized windows, they're currently icons only). Unity. MT Unity Love Handles. Xtreme customizability. Reflects. Shadows. Transparency. Raindrops. Snow. Fire. Autumn. Aquarium. Gears. Simply beautiful it is. And Windows is INSECURE, too. Install Ubuntu. (Wait till April 28th, that's best.)
@rinkavideos64 Windows is only insecure because it has an 85% marketshare in both the home and business market. Therefore hackers try harder to find security holes and make viruses for Windows. If you reverse the situation and give Linux an 85% marketshare and Windows 5%, then Linux will have far more viruses and security holes than Windows. Linux is only secure because hackers aren't interested in hacking Linux. There's more profit to gain from hacking Windows. Same goes for Mac OS X.
@Generalkidd Your argument is a falacy. If you dont know about how the Linux Kernel works and prevents all the privilege scalation, please close your ignorant mouth.
@rinkavideos64 Theres no reason to think that Linux is not the hackers objective, just check the statistics, who is the leader in the servers market?. The big companies use Linux on their servers, they recieve more attacks than a normal person. Because that, your comment is a falacy.
LINUX IS THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST //////// -- MAC is a piece of shit, because he is run only on apple, almost all of software is nonfree. --- LINUX is the best, because he can run on every PC, even without installation, and almost all software is free.
LINUX IS THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST //////// -- MAC is a piece of shit, because he is run only on apple, almost all of software is nonfree. --- LINUX is the best, because he can run on every PC, even without installation, and almost all software is free.
Can't wait 'till there is a Hi I'm a Mac, I'm a PC, I'm a Linux, I'm a BSD, I'm a Plan 9, I'm a Solaris, I'm a BeOS, I'm a CP/M, And I'm a Amiga, "All the others", commercial, would be the shit. BATTLE ROYALE! Plan 9 would so win.
The government should look to Linux for help. Model the Linux community for it's structure, and model Linux OS for it's efficiency. Then the world could be happy again!
Linux is not meant for appearence just for good working... i mean cmon visual interface of linux as obuntu and that is just as inestable as windows... but with the difference you have 4 kernells so you can freeze each one of them... (l) read hat
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ubuntu is the ugliest thing I've ever seen. With all of Ubuntu's many benefits, why is the team so fucking stupid to make the default theme ugly? I don't change my default XP theme, or Vista, or Windows 7.. I'm not going to add a little MSPaint ridicolous pathetic dock to Ubuntu. OpenSuse is slightly prettier, but still ugly.
I think you missed the whole point of this video. Linux is a OS the thing that you are calling "ugly" is just the desktop environment named gnome. If you dont like the looks just put on another jacket.
First of: gnome is only the standard light-weight interface. Designed to meet the needs for as many as possible users. That means maintaining speed while having pretty icons without making it too complicated. If you, however, prefer to have something nice and flashy, install Compiz-fusion. With only a moderate CPU consumption, it turns the interface into something windows could only dream of. Getting back to work? Turn it of. Simple. Windows can't offer that. It's hardcoded into the OS.
In comparison to explorer or Compiz-Fusion, Gnome is lightweight. Ofcourse, it doesn't match Xfce and certainly not Fluxbox but it maintains a pretty good balance between functionality and appeal. And you can't replace explorer. You can build a shell around it, which will consume even more resources and be crash-vulnerable because of the closed-source nature of explorer, but removing explorer is impossible as the entire Windows API is built around that one process.
Do a google searh for replacement windows shell, or whatever. I'm pretty sure it's possible to replace it, though having never tried it, I can't confirm this. The screenshots are very convincing, though, I must say.
Darwin does NOT use the Linux kernel. It was built around the Mach 3 kernel (Nextstep) with some additional code from the BSD systems. So technically, Mac is a Unix system, while Linux is a clone of Unix.
I think most of the people who are talking shit about linux never used it , or just tried to make a few double-clicks and gave it up ;P
But I'm sure that almost every Linux user knows how to use a windows system ...
You can't say it's not userfriendly , it's only because it's different and you expect it to be as windows .... if you would have tried it first Windows wouldn't be userfriendly
Linux is better just because it does everything OS 10 does, with the same key limitation, it wont run my windows apps. And since its free, i don't have to worry about any bs with activation, infact if you build a pc, and don't have a windows key with you( i made the BIG mistake of buying anouther one at a store). Just load linux on it, add the dock app, and boom, its just like os 10, only on a 300$ pc rather then a 600$ peace of crap mac mini
probably cuz thoughs newer games that yur playing need like direct x or something... try some linux games.... it has all thoughs strategy, adventure, and shooters
No waiting for wine to get it working in linux, no i played left for dead on launch day, and even though it kinda works in WINE it has a frame rate of like 10( compared to 35 on the same pc in windows)
"Keeping up with the Latest Trends" in my interpretation is support for the latest hardware, and software. As with "ALL distro's of linux" this is not true. I use linux everyday, and I don't need to spend time trying to get linux to work with my hardware or have to worry about adding firewire support to the kernel or wondering why my WiFi card isn't being detected. What good is updating the distro every six months when it does'nt fix the core issues?
It would be a lot easier for the devs to release drivers for new hardware faster if manufacturers would cooperate a bit more with them. If you know what you're doing, you can get almost any piece of hardware working. It just takes a little effort. If you still can't find a solution, why not make one? Linux doesn't move forward with complainers, only those who fix problems they have and contribute to the community are the ones who make linux progress.
I take issue with the the mainstream Linux GUIs - GNOME is buggy and gets in your face, the latest developments in KDE has made it slow, glitchy and crash-prone. XFCE has never cashed in on the promises it makes. As it is I'm stuck with the old KDE 3.5 line until either something better comes up, or I get around to writing my own desktop, WM and panel...
Any computer that can run Windows will be faster with KDE.
KDE is fast on a dual core 2GB RAM system.
I have Kubuntu 64 bit and I don't have any issue with bugs or crashes. It certainly crashes less than the Vista I have installed on the same machine (dual boot, it's as easy clicking 'Ok')
I've been around the Linux scene since KDE 1 hit the Internet... and KDE 4 is the first release I really don't like. They did a lot of unnecessary changes (such as the control center - a simple cleanup would have sufficed) and really failed when it came to the desktop re-write (it's slower, it's a lot buggier, it replaces perfectly good features, such as shortcuts to directories, wihtout providing an adequate replacement). The all-SVG Qt4-themes run dog slow. It's a bad release. I don't use it.
I have that on my work laptop, but I never touch that machine. Right now I'm Kubuntu with KDE 3.x on my desktop. Compiz is behaving very well too, not perfectly but it has never crashed.
For some reason, Compiz works a lot better when run with Gnome. I'm assuming this is due in no small part to compiz having been built on Gnome libraries. Sure, it works with KDE, but it's been, in my experience, jerky and laggy for no particular reason.
I'm guessing this is just varying mileage, since a lot of people seem to be using it without issues under KDE...
Compiz Fusion has never integrated with KDE properly. But Kwin now with properly integrated composite support has now made Compiz Fusion redundant (you don't need Compiz Fusion to have snazzy effects in KDE 4.2).
I like the control center, its much better than the old KControl. The old codebase was not resonably manageable so they made the decision for a rewrite and used this as an opportunity to used new technology, it has been rocky, but KDE 4.2 is finally starting to shine. Great speed, stability improvements, and overall polish. This year will be a great year for KDE.
zweden is gay, Linux works so well it's not even funny. it's like taking the good looks of mac and the utilities of PC and turning into your own weapon of destruction, most kids use linux because its free, has no licenses or copyright BS (copying DVDs is child's play), and it is extremely customizable
Seriously, Ma and Pa and the kid are going to sit around the "Linux Box" and type in commands dood... oh whoops need the new xpbatlk for super_family_game. One sec dear, I'll recompile the kernel... YAH F()CK1N RIGHT.
what planet are you from? You could give your mom Ubuntu or knopix and tell her it's windows, she wouldn't know the diff. She would thank you for making her life easier.
What exactly isn't true? That Windows will look the same for the next six to seven years?
Yes it is true. We've been stuck with Windows XP for six years, and for six years it had the same layout. Same goes for the other operating systems. Especially if you realize that Windows 95 to Windows ME all looked the same visually.
"keep up with the latest trends" circa 2001 style..hahaha
bloucou 5 months ago
She should have wore fedora
blizzaroxx 7 months ago
leather, nayys!!
ecuhct 9 months ago
IF ONLY SEE WAS ANIME...THEN IT WOULD BE REPRESENTATIVE
EpicPoseidonBeard 11 months ago
"Linu kssss"
joebandoe 1 year ago
Ironically no Linux user has ever seen a female...
TH3AnimeFreak 1 year ago
lol wearing that for another six or seven years. Even though Vista had a short shelf life, it's still technically true because Windows 7 is pretty much the same as Vista.
Generalkidd 1 year ago
@Generalkidd I love the way Vista looks, but Ambiance is seriously the best theme I ever seen in my life. Gonna stick with that for 2 million years : P
rinkavideos64 11 months ago
@rinkavideos64 I mainly like Vista because of it's Aero Theme which includes Flip 3D, Aero Preview, and so on.
Generalkidd 11 months ago
@Generalkidd Are you crazy? You can make Linux look *way* better than Aero.
rinkavideos64 11 months ago
@rinkavideos64 It's been 6 years since the release of Windows Vista. I have yet to see any Linux themes that look better than Aero in my opinion. I know KDE also has transparency effects like Aero, but overall, KDE Plasma Desktop still just doesn't give you the same impression as Aero. This is all my opinion of course.
Generalkidd 11 months ago
@Generalkidd Spinning cubes. Coverflow switcher. Wobbly windows. Genie effect. Cool magnifier. Ambiance. Live previews (download Compiz nightly to see them on minimized windows, they're currently icons only). Unity. MT Unity Love Handles. Xtreme customizability. Reflects. Shadows. Transparency. Raindrops. Snow. Fire. Autumn. Aquarium. Gears. Simply beautiful it is. And Windows is INSECURE, too. Install Ubuntu. (Wait till April 28th, that's best.)
rinkavideos64 11 months ago
@rinkavideos64 Windows is only insecure because it has an 85% marketshare in both the home and business market. Therefore hackers try harder to find security holes and make viruses for Windows. If you reverse the situation and give Linux an 85% marketshare and Windows 5%, then Linux will have far more viruses and security holes than Windows. Linux is only secure because hackers aren't interested in hacking Linux. There's more profit to gain from hacking Windows. Same goes for Mac OS X.
Generalkidd 11 months ago
@Generalkidd Your argument is a falacy. If you dont know about how the Linux Kernel works and prevents all the privilege scalation, please close your ignorant mouth.
Metaldownloads 10 months ago
@rinkavideos64 Theres no reason to think that Linux is not the hackers objective, just check the statistics, who is the leader in the servers market?. The big companies use Linux on their servers, they recieve more attacks than a normal person. Because that, your comment is a falacy.
Metaldownloads 10 months ago
@Metaldownloads Fucking smartass wanting to fuck on other sexy linux girls trying to get them to use Micro$hit Crapdoze.
rinkavideos64 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Find a playful chick make it tonight benaughtyman.info
garzafernandez 1 year ago
"Leoparrd." lmfao
EightyDx 1 year ago
whos Plan 9? Are they a good band?
delta3303 1 year ago
@delta3303
Plan 9 was the follow up to Unix from Bell Labs. It exists, but it didn't take over from Unix.
blahdelablah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LINUX IS THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST //////// -- MAC is a piece of shit, because he is run only on apple, almost all of software is nonfree. --- LINUX is the best, because he can run on every PC, even without installation, and almost all software is free.
SERIOUSRONAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LINUX IS THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST OF THE BEST //////// -- MAC is a piece of shit, because he is run only on apple, almost all of software is nonfree. --- LINUX is the best, because he can run on every PC, even without installation, and almost all software is free.
SERIOUSRONAN 1 year ago
Can't wait 'till there is a Hi I'm a Mac, I'm a PC, I'm a Linux, I'm a BSD, I'm a Plan 9, I'm a Solaris, I'm a BeOS, I'm a CP/M, And I'm a Amiga, "All the others", commercial, would be the shit. BATTLE ROYALE! Plan 9 would so win.
jcdx22 1 year ago
Actually people can make and share themes on PC too..... not so sure about Mac though.....
Pigot98 1 year ago
@Pigot98 lol you think they're talking about themes or desktops. Sorry man. It's so much more.
TheTalkingCricket 1 year ago
@TheTalkingCricket Actually ou can change a lot more things than themes and desktops, eg sounds, cursors etc.
But let's not start a Linux Vs. Windows war, Linux and Windows unite :)
Pigot98 1 year ago
Yeah! Linux is for girls!
Wiizl 1 year ago
The government should look to Linux for help. Model the Linux community for it's structure, and model Linux OS for it's efficiency. Then the world could be happy again!
sudo42 1 year ago
Linux commercial ha!!!...was probably edited on a Mac.
Mark123USA 2 years ago
You mean overpriced BSD?
42akhan 1 year ago
Comment removed
42akhan 1 year ago
"I'll probably wear this for another 6 or 7 years." All proud of himself!! ahhahaah
augustomen 2 years ago 3
i dont care..windows is a piece of shit.
bluefox9er 2 years ago
Then you're an idiot.
phreaksterman 2 years ago
they should rly start to make commercials on tv to start getting ppls attention about linux
mikman2 2 years ago 5
And who is the "They" that would pay for the commercials?
SisterLoquacious 2 years ago
if it was at least true.
TheNail4147 2 years ago
the funny thing is this add is SOOO true!!!!
Featherylock 2 years ago 8
Linux is not meant for appearence just for good working... i mean cmon visual interface of linux as obuntu and that is just as inestable as windows... but with the difference you have 4 kernells so you can freeze each one of them... (l) read hat
conectado2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ubuntu is the ugliest thing I've ever seen. With all of Ubuntu's many benefits, why is the team so fucking stupid to make the default theme ugly? I don't change my default XP theme, or Vista, or Windows 7.. I'm not going to add a little MSPaint ridicolous pathetic dock to Ubuntu. OpenSuse is slightly prettier, but still ugly.
TheJoeyzxc 2 years ago
I think you missed the whole point of this video. Linux is a OS the thing that you are calling "ugly" is just the desktop environment named gnome. If you dont like the looks just put on another jacket.
rshoogstad 2 years ago 5
First of: gnome is only the standard light-weight interface. Designed to meet the needs for as many as possible users. That means maintaining speed while having pretty icons without making it too complicated. If you, however, prefer to have something nice and flashy, install Compiz-fusion. With only a moderate CPU consumption, it turns the interface into something windows could only dream of. Getting back to work? Turn it of. Simple. Windows can't offer that. It's hardcoded into the OS.
Gyzome 2 years ago
Gnome > lightweight. I lol'd. You should know it is possible to replace explorer in Windows.
42akhan 1 year ago
@42akhan
In comparison to explorer or Compiz-Fusion, Gnome is lightweight. Ofcourse, it doesn't match Xfce and certainly not Fluxbox but it maintains a pretty good balance between functionality and appeal. And you can't replace explorer. You can build a shell around it, which will consume even more resources and be crash-vulnerable because of the closed-source nature of explorer, but removing explorer is impossible as the entire Windows API is built around that one process.
Gyzome 1 year ago
You can build a shell . . . around a shell?
Do a google searh for replacement windows shell, or whatever. I'm pretty sure it's possible to replace it, though having never tried it, I can't confirm this. The screenshots are very convincing, though, I must say.
42akhan 1 year ago
Akueda> probably because they'd get sued if they did! :)
thewindk 2 years ago
linux is an OS and run's on a pc, why they say pc if they want to say windows :)
akueda 2 years ago 2
Pffff, microsoft copies mac, but linux copies macs ads
Yousee4 2 years ago 2
I use to like Ubuntu, until I tried OpenSuse.
GO HOT SUSE! GO NOVELL!
CrewRite 2 years ago
I use linux mint ^_^
MrThePCTeacher 2 years ago
That makes two of us.
rocke4444 2 years ago
That's because the black service tech from the other Mac-PC vid services yer mom now
DancingSpiderman 2 years ago
OMG...linux is HAWT!@#
ashmew2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that girl looks stupid
PoCkAhAuNtUs~
Pockahauntus 2 years ago
So Linux is sexy now?
fsimsdc2006 3 years ago 5
Linux has been sexy for a while now...
martini1179 2 years ago 6
Ubuntu is sexy enough these days.
vbobkovsky 2 years ago 4
This isnt right,basiclly Mac ís Linux,since its built on top of Darwin (linux kernel)...
I'll porve it to you...with some tweaks to Ubuntu you can create an almost perfect Mac-clone.
Jordey24 3 years ago
Darwin does NOT use the Linux kernel. It was built around the Mach 3 kernel (Nextstep) with some additional code from the BSD systems. So technically, Mac is a Unix system, while Linux is a clone of Unix.
djharuko 3 years ago
well,linux-like anyways...
Jordey24 3 years ago
linux is not a clone of unix ... it has its own kernel... its not built off of unix... OS X is a unix OS though
fuzzman25 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
linux sucks
hellomynameis112233 3 years ago
lol your comment = EPIC FAIL.
Keruaran 3 years ago
Well I'll probably wear this for another six six or seven years!
I'm gasping for for air.
funny stuff
IWILLEATYOUHEAD 3 years ago 23
I think most of the people who are talking shit about linux never used it , or just tried to make a few double-clicks and gave it up ;P
But I'm sure that almost every Linux user knows how to use a windows system ...
You can't say it's not userfriendly , it's only because it's different and you expect it to be as windows .... if you would have tried it first Windows wouldn't be userfriendly
piefge83 3 years ago 3
Linux is better just because it does everything OS 10 does, with the same key limitation, it wont run my windows apps. And since its free, i don't have to worry about any bs with activation, infact if you build a pc, and don't have a windows key with you( i made the BIG mistake of buying anouther one at a store). Just load linux on it, add the dock app, and boom, its just like os 10, only on a 300$ pc rather then a 600$ peace of crap mac mini
ksoul22 3 years ago
"it wont run my windows apps"
It might. Install WINE and have a look at the WINEHQ website. It may well support the apps you want to run.
Keruaran 3 years ago 2
I know about wine, and while its a good effort and all, its just not possible to play the lastest games with linux. Great OS though
ksoul22 3 years ago
probably cuz thoughs newer games that yur playing need like direct x or something... try some linux games.... it has all thoughs strategy, adventure, and shooters
fuzzman25 3 years ago
Im a gamer. linux games are cute, sure, but most of them look like some student product, when i need some real games im still stuck on windows.
ksoul22 3 years ago
yeah i just love thoughs games with Tux in them
fuzzman25 3 years ago
But It has some interesting games, like Doom 3, Quake 4, Prey, SimCity, among others.
Just try them, they're nice.
nicolunacba 3 years ago
im a gamer that means it comes out... i want it.
No waiting for wine to get it working in linux, no i played left for dead on launch day, and even though it kinda works in WINE it has a frame rate of like 10( compared to 35 on the same pc in windows)
ksoul22 3 years ago
the games i said are native of linux. sorry, my english sucks. I mean, they are not using wine, they are linux version.
nicolunacba 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Haaa,. "I keep up with the latest trends"
WHAT EVER.
Linux does'nt support 99% of the "Trends"
GHynson 3 years ago
What trends are you talking about? Most Linux distros are constantly updated, unlike other operating systems that update once every 4 years.
lolcheesecake 3 years ago 4
Every distro of Linux has usability issues.
"Keeping up with the Latest Trends" in my interpretation is support for the latest hardware, and software. As with "ALL distro's of linux" this is not true. I use linux everyday, and I don't need to spend time trying to get linux to work with my hardware or have to worry about adding firewire support to the kernel or wondering why my WiFi card isn't being detected. What good is updating the distro every six months when it does'nt fix the core issues?
GHynson 3 years ago
It would be a lot easier for the devs to release drivers for new hardware faster if manufacturers would cooperate a bit more with them. If you know what you're doing, you can get almost any piece of hardware working. It just takes a little effort. If you still can't find a solution, why not make one? Linux doesn't move forward with complainers, only those who fix problems they have and contribute to the community are the ones who make linux progress.
lolcheesecake 3 years ago 4
Linux supports more hardware "out of the box" than any other operating system. Period. And if you use Linux, you know that.
Keruaran 3 years ago 5
Amen.
nicolunacba 3 years ago 2
Linux sets trends.
Keruaran 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what the fuck.
linux is ugly as hell?
harvardjanitor7 3 years ago
I love the Linux girl!
gizmo2084 3 years ago 3
true jeje
ImpatientPollo1 3 years ago
haha pretty true
DeadHand1992 3 years ago
Linux girl is so gorgeous...
Revolucionario02 3 years ago 2
Unlike linux xD
Dai101 3 years ago
LOLs, "I think I will be wearing this for another six or seven years"
ithurtsokay 3 years ago 16
rofl. this is great! it is soo tru!
KornFritterz 3 years ago
So True!
Linux GUI's are really cool, and there is not Just one like in Windows or Mac.
And they are being developed the whole time, I don't have to wait like 5 years for another graphic interface.
And what's better, I don't have to wait like 6 years to get almost the same shit, and worst (Vista)
natanzuelo 3 years ago 6
I take issue with the the mainstream Linux GUIs - GNOME is buggy and gets in your face, the latest developments in KDE has made it slow, glitchy and crash-prone. XFCE has never cashed in on the promises it makes. As it is I'm stuck with the old KDE 3.5 line until either something better comes up, or I get around to writing my own desktop, WM and panel...
int3rl0per 3 years ago
In my computer, I get the impression that KDE works a little bit less fast than Gnome, although they say KDE uses less resources than Gnome.
Other than that, I never had any serious problem with Gnome or KDE. Really, I only remember one time, when it got frozen and I had to restart it.
Good luck with your own desktop development :-D
natanzuelo 3 years ago 3
Any computer that can run Windows will be faster with KDE.
KDE is fast on a dual core 2GB RAM system.
I have Kubuntu 64 bit and I don't have any issue with bugs or crashes. It certainly crashes less than the Vista I have installed on the same machine (dual boot, it's as easy clicking 'Ok')
T1Oracle 3 years ago 2
I've been around the Linux scene since KDE 1 hit the Internet... and KDE 4 is the first release I really don't like. They did a lot of unnecessary changes (such as the control center - a simple cleanup would have sufficed) and really failed when it came to the desktop re-write (it's slower, it's a lot buggier, it replaces perfectly good features, such as shortcuts to directories, wihtout providing an adequate replacement). The all-SVG Qt4-themes run dog slow. It's a bad release. I don't use it.
int3rl0per 3 years ago 3
I have that on my work laptop, but I never touch that machine. Right now I'm Kubuntu with KDE 3.x on my desktop. Compiz is behaving very well too, not perfectly but it has never crashed.
T1Oracle 3 years ago
For some reason, Compiz works a lot better when run with Gnome. I'm assuming this is due in no small part to compiz having been built on Gnome libraries. Sure, it works with KDE, but it's been, in my experience, jerky and laggy for no particular reason.
I'm guessing this is just varying mileage, since a lot of people seem to be using it without issues under KDE...
int3rl0per 3 years ago
Compiz Fusion has never integrated with KDE properly. But Kwin now with properly integrated composite support has now made Compiz Fusion redundant (you don't need Compiz Fusion to have snazzy effects in KDE 4.2).
Keruaran 3 years ago
I haven't liked kde 3 either until I tried the recent builds of 4.2. It's finally to the point where I actually enjoy using it again.
johnemersonsfoot 3 years ago
KDE4 made me switch to GNOME because I hated it so much (plasma ew). I now use GNOME exclusively, and like it.
MattWindsor91 3 years ago
KDE 4.2 is fantastic.
Keruaran 3 years ago
I like the control center, its much better than the old KControl. The old codebase was not resonably manageable so they made the decision for a rewrite and used this as an opportunity to used new technology, it has been rocky, but KDE 4.2 is finally starting to shine. Great speed, stability improvements, and overall polish. This year will be a great year for KDE.
Keruaran 3 years ago
zweden is gay, Linux works so well it's not even funny. it's like taking the good looks of mac and the utilities of PC and turning into your own weapon of destruction, most kids use linux because its free, has no licenses or copyright BS (copying DVDs is child's play), and it is extremely customizable
GundamLad 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Right. Like the nerds who use Linux would be trendy!
IDDERS 4 years ago
Seriously, Ma and Pa and the kid are going to sit around the "Linux Box" and type in commands dood... oh whoops need the new xpbatlk for super_family_game. One sec dear, I'll recompile the kernel... YAH F()CK1N RIGHT.
ericmcbride 4 years ago
what planet are you from? You could give your mom Ubuntu or knopix and tell her it's windows, she wouldn't know the diff. She would thank you for making her life easier.
Infomaniack 4 years ago 2
wtflol
ericmcbride 4 years ago
lol. so true :)
transatlant1c 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bullshit, Linux - latest trends haha! It's only the übernerds using Linux. That system only fits into steersystems, it's not user friendly!
zweden89 4 years ago
dude its way more user friendly then any microsoft OS
fuzzman25 3 years ago 18
@fuzzman25
whats mean "friendly" in your words?
cmpeax5 8 months ago
@fuzzman25 what is, mac os? try out win 7 if you meant macs OS. seriously
159tony 5 months ago
very good video, lots of truth to it!
SolarisZen 4 years ago
"I'll probably wear this for another six to seven years". It's funny because it's true.
Really, the creators of these videos are definitely smart guys (or females) with a good sense of humor. I enjoy these videos very much
LemmensSteven 5 years ago
Not true.
wombatofcombat 4 years ago
What exactly isn't true? That Windows will look the same for the next six to seven years?
Yes it is true. We've been stuck with Windows XP for six years, and for six years it had the same layout. Same goes for the other operating systems. Especially if you realize that Windows 95 to Windows ME all looked the same visually.
Think about it.
LemmensSteven 4 years ago