@Gencturk92 LOOL wtf are you talking about ?? ''campbell did not touch the ball, he was just walking towards the keeper'' ''the keeper had to give the ball to the ref otherwise its time wasting'' oh my fuckin god you reached top level of being a retarded fuck
@toyoljohor84 beacause when a defender plays it back to his own keeper is it a foul, but not if he plays it back with his head. Its rare to see it on the TV but thats beacause keepers know that....., instead of fabianski ;D
The Arsenal goal was a product of very poor defending by Porto´s players. I mean it almost looked like they were playing footvolley inside Porto´s box. That conceded goal makes me a bit uneasy about the away game in London.
Porto must score a goal early on and make arsenal run after the ball the rest of the game. Although they possess a very strong triangle (Diaby-Fabregas-Rosicky), it´s no impossible task.
@sirlordtom98 He raised is hand. And it was him who gave the ball to the kick taker.
The rules of football are made to waist the minimum time possible and to play fairly.
If you notice, one of the defenders is calling his teammates so they can go to the box faster. And you don't see any of them complaying about the goal. They screwed up and they now it.
Queria era que o Porto apanha-se o Arsenal este ano. On arsenal perdia uns 4 - 0 á vontade.
Porto <3
TheLegendary57 10 months ago
Comment removed
Gencturk92 11 months ago
@Gencturk92 LOOL wtf are you talking about ?? ''campbell did not touch the ball, he was just walking towards the keeper'' ''the keeper had to give the ball to the ref otherwise its time wasting'' oh my fuckin god you reached top level of being a retarded fuck
andradejp55 7 months ago
Comment removed
kejoooo96 1 year ago
holly shit!!!terrible goalkeeping!!!
MyNikeKicks 1 year ago
what a dirty play !
benjeehummer 1 year ago
why foul at 2nd goal????????
toyoljohor84 2 years ago
@toyoljohor84 beacause when a defender plays it back to his own keeper is it a foul, but not if he plays it back with his head. Its rare to see it on the TV but thats beacause keepers know that....., instead of fabianski ;D
Pizzafyr1 1 year ago
porto will still get raped..arshavin is playing
tenseman08 2 years ago
Fabianski 2-1 Arsenal
RifaatXY 2 years ago
Fabiansky booted it after the second goal. He should have booted it before it happened and taken the yellow.
Even though the two goals were unlucky rookie mistakes, Fabiansky saved things Almunia would have let by.
UGMF 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ebay - Australia
VINTAGE NIKE ARSENAL FOOTBALL JERSEY # 11 WILTORD -
2000 - 2002
Item # 330408287668
whatglove 2 years ago
The Arsenal goal was a product of very poor defending by Porto´s players. I mean it almost looked like they were playing footvolley inside Porto´s box. That conceded goal makes me a bit uneasy about the away game in London.
Porto must score a goal early on and make arsenal run after the ball the rest of the game. Although they possess a very strong triangle (Diaby-Fabregas-Rosicky), it´s no impossible task.
Andre2010 2 years ago
arbitre de merde , quand je pense qu''il est sélectionné pour la coupe du monde...y a de quoi avoir peur ...
bondoriginal 2 years ago
How much Port had to pay the ref to allow Porto to score this second goal? Did Campbell even touch the ball?
az5303 2 years ago
@az5303
he touched it
martin312312312 2 years ago
The ref, dintn't even touch the whissle when the freekick was played
sirlordtom98 2 years ago
only a stupid goalie whould give away the ball before your own team has come back to build a wall.
A correct action by a goalie in this situation is to hold on the ball. even though it means that he will get a yellow card.
martin312312312 1 year ago
@sirlordtom98 He raised is hand. And it was him who gave the ball to the kick taker.
The rules of football are made to waist the minimum time possible and to play fairly.
If you notice, one of the defenders is calling his teammates so they can go to the box faster. And you don't see any of them complaying about the goal. They screwed up and they now it.
Dragon7F1 1 year ago
If he touched it then :-?? it's a perfectly valid goal although i do resent fabiansky for being such an idiot
boscodeala 2 years ago
@az5303 Yes he did.
Do your research before saying stupid things like that.
Do you see Cambell complayning after the referee giving the foul? No.
Dragon7F1 1 year ago
hahahahaha xDDDDDD What a match x)
cioppa22 2 years ago