The only way that Evolution seems plausible to Atheists is because of the time process involved..What if Evolution occurred in a day?, a reptile transforming into a Human Being!...Would we not see Atheists calling that a Supernatural Belief and therefore can not believe that such a thing can happen!
@ImagesByDavid Of course not, because we DON'T see that. If indeed we did see evolution functioning that fast, we'd revise evolution. If we saw a creator deity doing it all by tugging on little strings connected to every particle in the universe, THEN we'd give you more credence.
"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse"
Quoting the Bible to those who believe in an Almighty Creator is more credible than anything you can produce. Such an Almighty Creator revealed Himself to Men and through His Son Jesus Christ. The sources are known and the Book of Acts was written two years after the Crucifixion of Jesus. A time in history that has been recorded by Jewish historians. Prophecies of the future have come to pass that only a Creator could know.
To answer your Questions, Men, many thousands ago, Earth
@ImagesByDavid Quoting an object of obsession to the obsessed, yes, it would seem very plausible. Additionally, Judaism is the predecessor of Christianity, and features, I kid you not, teleporting priests in its mythology. Present evidence, something testable, verifiable, and above all observable, or else there is naught.
@ImagesByDavid There are certain portions of the Torah where a known priest is mentioned, but could not have been at a given location based on the dates given and the distance between two locations. As such, certain priests are said to have been gifted by the divine with the ability to teleport. Islam has a similar tradition within the Quran called Tay al-Ard
@ImagesByDavid It's not specific, they're vague references here and there, and the Torah is a big book. I'd need to cite events involving about thirty different priests to establish their whereabouts and dates and the inconsistencies in order to also verify their possession of teleportation abilities. Religious texts tend to have inconsistencies like this, the Bible alone skips a good decade of Jesus' teen life.
@ImagesByDavid Upon further research, the teleporting priests are an Islamic tradition, not a Jewish one, apologies.
They didn't write about his teen years because they didn't know him then...but they wrote about his childhood and birth...strange. There's also the Dead Sea Scrolls which indicate that the Bible is not only incomplete but purposefully edited in its near-original state, a state which has then been translated through several languages AND further edited towards political purposes.
the Birth of Jesus was foretold and dont you think that the Apostles would have discussed the Birth of Jesus with His mother Mary and even with Himself Jesus. No need to complicate things for yourself.
The Dead Sea Scrolls matches up with todays Torah.
@ImagesByDavid Perhaps its something I missed in Sunday school, but I distinctly recall the entire nativity being "Who is this baby and why should I care? Oh wait, angels and stars, alright." I'd imagine it'd be quite different if things had actually been foreseen.
@ImagesByDavid Whatever the Bible was, if it was ever the actual word of god written down by man, it isn't anymore. Nothing in it today can be taken as credible.
"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work"
The Writings in the Bible are transforming people everyday. Throughout the world from Lima to Moscow, Sydney to London, Tehran to Nairobi people are testifying to the Supernatural power of the Gospel.
@ImagesByDavid You have now ceased to be debating this topic and are now just evangelising. I will give you credit for last almost a day, most theists don't.
You come at me with lies and you said so yourself. Who confuses the Bible with the Quran in discussions?
Then you started on the Bible which I went to respond and now you say
"You have now ceased to be debating this topic"
tut tut you see my photographic work via my website given to me by Jesus through prayer. You want to become a good artist then surrender your worldly knowledge & let God bless you.
The Birth of Jesus was prophesied many hundreds of years before it happened.
@ImagesByDavid Your photography is irrelevant. It does not show any evidence to support the existence of God, the validity of Jesus Christ as his son or mankind's savior, or the credibility of the Bible.
You take those photographs, your hand guides the framing, your eye the lighting and your brain the arrangement. That you attribute them instead to a man confirmed by your own holy text as dead over two thousand years ago is a sign of delusion, not truth.
black man doesn't seemed to have evolved at all. You have to admit, setting aside political correctness for 5 seconds alot of the most primitive pictures of cavemen there do look like niggers and are just as primitive as niggers in africa to the present day
The natural order of life's genomes is to go from a state of order to less order. A simple brain does not evolve into a complex brain. See Cornell University's Dr. John Sanford, Genetic Entropy and The Mystery of The Genome. The human genome is deteriorating via the accumulation of mutations. Overall, mutations have the sum impact of being deleterious. Macro evolution is a fairy tale. Atheism is moronic.
@achilles197474 wrote: "A simple brain does not evolve into a complex brain."
Speak for yourself, retard.
achilles wrote: "See... Dr. John Sanford..."
Another intellectual who, as he inches closer to death, has latched on to the judeo-christian superstition because it promises him eternal life. No different than any other intellectual who claims alliance with any other religion which offers the same promise...
... and certainly not a convincing argument for intelligent design.
@fubaraoul Sanford - 25 genetic patents including the gene gun. Your ad hominem attack only proves that you have nothing to refute his evidence that the human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase.
@achilles197474 wrote: "@fubaraoul Sanford - 25 genetic patents including the gene gun."
Like I said, the man is clearly intelligent. Here's the thing: He didn't patent anything that proves evolution (specifically, speciation) is false, you fucking moron.
@achilles197474 wrote: "... you have nothing to refute his evidence that the human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase."
"The human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase" is a meaningless string of fancy words simple minded fucks like yourself swallow without question because it comes from someone who shares your particular religious delusion, which pretty much precludes there being any evidence for the claim.
In other words, there's nothing to refute, you fucking moron.
"WE NOW KNOW FROM OUR UNDERSTANDING OF QUANTUM MECHANICS THAT LIGHT IS THE FORCE THAT KEEPS ELECTRONS TIED TO THE NUCLEI OF ATOMS AND ATOMS TIED TOGETHER TO MAKE MOLECULES AND THEN FINALLY, OBJECTS" Go read a book if you can actually read. Study or something- You are very ignorant and foolish and you don't seem to mind if the entire world knows-
RELIGION IS DIEING, EVOLUTION IS THE WAY FORWARD. SEE WHAT I DID THAR? LOL ANYWAY I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY MY GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GRANDAD USED TO CLIMB TREES LIKE A NIGGER.
@nonignorat why should they? they can easily reproduce the way they are, they are competitive enough to survive. you're assuming that humans are "better" than monkeys. in evolution, "better" means more able to survive and reproduce.
@TheOpendEyes Exactly. The human form and soul coming about from monkeys is a ZIONIST LIE; just like feminism, multiculturalism, anti-racism, homosexual rights, etc. It is used to help eliminate our morals, all racial distinctions, and people's faith in God. Also, the various race groups are completely different. The idea that the black Africans traveled to all four corners of Europe, magically transformed into white people, and then created all of our music, art and technology is beyond crazy.
What about those 20,000 peer reviewed scientific articles that are published by professional scientists about research and discoveries in field of evolutionary biology EVERY YEAR?
You know, those 20,000 articles per year out of which you have not bothered to read even ONE?
@nonignorat Because modern apes are not the apes we evolved from, they are a different species that branched off just as we did. In short, they are neither the creatures we came from nor are they in the same conditions that caused our evolution, but we are related to them, as cousins, not descendants.
The test of any theory is whether or not it provides answers to basic questions. Some well-meaning but misguided people think evolution is a reasonable theory to explain man’s questions about the universe. Evolution is not a good theory—it is just a pagan religion masquerading as science.
Outerghost, please remove this video. Both the video content and video description are misleading and portray evolution incorrectly.
Since there's no reason on Earth why someone who wants to educate through the medium of video would want his videos to misinform, so too is there no reason for leaving this up.
Hey Outerghost, you may already know this, but those modern primates you show at the beginning are not ancestors of humans, but evolutionary "cousins". Though its true that some early ancestors of humans probably looked a lot like chimps.
Otherwise nice video, much better than that creationist junk. Cheers!
To even attempt and fathom the the universe or our creation is POINTLESS. We are such tiny little particles in this massive space and we are here for such short time that by even thinking about this stuff you are wasting time.
@stomperfood When people carry out a task with no real reward in completion, like playing a video game, you usually do it to have fun while you're doing it. This can even be said of things that do have rewards. The journey is often reward enough in it's self, the actual reward is just gravy sometimes.
In this respect, what task could be better than the pursuit of knowledge?
you all stupid to say humans from apes. why the stupid evolution is not happening now, if evolution is true means why the idiot evolution stop within humans ,why humans not turn to any monsters. evolution is 100 % sure not possible for humans.
we are humans not from apes,just think deep,u will got the answer who we are? apes are similar to us in structure but not in brain, only life cycles happened in earth.
dinosaurs,mammals, humans with other life system. dont believe we from monkey
@sounza May people say we came from apes. but that's not true. we came from something similar to apes. and the only reason that evolution has stop is because we as humans rely to much on technology. we don't walk as much, due to cars. we don't swim as much because of boats. we don't talk as much because of the Internet. we are not as active as our ancestors. I'm not saying technology is bad. i rely on technology just as much as anyone else. but then again this is only my point of view.
@MrJuangonzo do one thing take some kids and keep in secret place without any communication,just go back after 25 years and look at them,they seems like apes,with long hairs,big mails,strange teeth's and not much thinking sense ,so cant say we from animals, humans take more time to learn his brain power- 2 million years.we doesn't had guidance on 2million years but we learned everything by practice.
@MrJuangonzo That's wrong, evolution has stopped because of medicine and our view of what we believe to be deformities or mutations. We have put a stop to almost all diseases that single us out in the form of natural selection. Being our bodies assimilate to our surroundings and what we force them to go through, science should take a long look at the birth control pill and how that might effect genetic strands that consistently use it for several centuries! Evolution to extinction!
@tBusket So evolution was stopped because of thing man created. and our point of view of normal and deformations. @sounza so over the course of 2 million years the human brain became more complex, human started learning to us tool and create things to help with their everyday life.
@MrJuangonzo The opposing thumb was a genetic mutation! That mutation allowed for that primate to have physical control over what could be used as tools/weapons giving that primate the advantage to out-survive the rest and pass on that genetic mutation...which is evolution! Today we have the ability to cure diseases that some can live with and some can't, allowing the weaker to survive in a world of evolution that has brought us here by survival of the fittest! I never said it was a bad thing!
Sorry to burst your bubble, but REALITY does not care about what you WANT to believe. You share common ancestor with apes, whether you like it or not, and no amount of moaning will change that fact.
@Hobu123 " You share common ancestor with apes, whether you like it or not, and no amount of moaning will change that fact." You do, not me. You can snif assholes and grub for ticks all you want. !!!
"COUPLE" of fakes..... Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
shotsxxx, do you really fail to understand that when you keep repeating "evolution can not be observed" you make everyone who knows anything about evolution roll on the floor laughing?
Everyone who knows anything about evolution knows how it is being observed and tested. So basically your moaning is the same as if you went to astronomer and said that stars do not exist, despite the fact that he sees them every day.
@Hobu123 We don't need science to tell us if something is observed or not,we simply observe it if it can be.Well....maybe some of you need someone to tell you what something looks like so you don't have to look for yourself.I guess everything is propaganda if it shows something different than your opinion and brainwash-I made my points.Only a fool would disregard them.And you still insist you have said something correct.I will not respond to so many posts.A fool speaks with many words.
@Hobu123 You seem to think people need you to tell them if science is correct or not.Anyone can check out what I said and think for themselves and see the truth.We don't need anyone to explain what is obvious-You have no education.You only repeat what you have been programed to think.Be a good little robot and don't think for yourself.Look silly and stupid.Just don't use logic or reason just say you do, then proclaim YOURSELF intelligent because nobody else will- Hahahahaha loser !!!!!!!
Sorry, but I have scientific degree in field of biology, which automatically also means that I have studied lots of science while you have studied NOTHING.
If you only bothered to educate yourself at least a bit, you would start to discover the wonderful world and gain knowledge about evolutionary biology. But you won't educate yourself because you prefer your idiotic Bronze Age fairytale about hocus-pocus-jebus flying around you.
I read many articles over the years. That's how I know that all of them are superficial descriptive stories. They also said that it take millions of years for making the coal. But in laboratory, coal is produced in 1 hour.
If you proved in laboratory condition that bacteria evolves into higher being, I will believe.
Name me one peer reviewed scientific article you have read.
It is obvious that you have read none of them because "peer rewieved scientific article" is NOT a "descriptive story". It is overview about the research conducted, together with exact methodology used, what material was collected, how it was analyzed, what results were gained, how these results were analyzed and what conclusions can be drawn from them. Presented in a way that allows you to do the same research again.
These descriptions you read from educational sources are NOT peer reviewed scientific articles.
Also there is no doubt that coal deposits have formed over long time. The evidence of it is in them. Mostly coal layers are found in sedimentary rocks deposited in flood plains. They often contain stream channels, roots, and soil horizons. So it doesnt matter how quickly you can form coal in lab, the evidence in natural coal deposits shows that they have not formed quickly.
Often there are many layers of coal above each other, each of them containing their own many tree and footprint horizons, soil layers, plant root remains etc. It is impossible for these all to form quickly as it takes time for forests to grow and those layers to form.
Since evolutionary biology does not claim that bacteria overnight evolves into "higher being", your request is nonsensical and absurd. Perfect example of creationist dishonesty.
Yawn, seen them. Boring. The amount of retarded nonsense in those vides is amazing, and brainwashed religioidiots watch with eyes wide and believe every piece of that crap, although every schoolchild can refute all Hovind's nonsense, it just needsa bit of education to do it (you don't need to be scientist to refute Hovinds retarded crap).
You take your "science" from a man who thinks that sound waves are part of electromagnetic spectrum, ROFLMAO!
Seriously, if you want to surprise me with anything then you need to try much harder than suggesting me to watch the videos of one of the most idiotic persons on planet Earth. Kent Hovind... LMAO. The idiot who speaks so much nonsense that even OTHER CREATIONISTS distance themselves from him.
Look how Hovind contradicts in his own "arguments": l6_o1GxgNMQ
"Why do people laugh at creationists?" is a series for you to watch in youtube.
When Hovind seriously claims that one drop of water is enough to cover whole Earth, doesn't it REALLY generate any doubt in your brain that he may be idiot? One drop of water only contains limited amount of molecules and the thinnest layer you can create is monolayer. To cover Earth with monolayer of water molecules you need 150,000 tons of water, not just "one drop" as Hovind claims.
And people like you still blindly absorb his retarded crap.
@Hobu123 A "scientific" degree? AUTOMATICALLY? "I have studied NOTHING?" You are a dolt. I guess you think since you have this "automatic" right to say you are correct and everyone else who disagrees is wrong- Hahaha what a fool- You have no clue who I am or my credentials. Anyone with a real degree can know by your wording and implications of your wordings that in fact, You do not have a degree and that you are only a poor uneducated YouTube troll pretending what you are not - (p1)
@Hobu123 If you are so educated why don't you do something worth while like formulate an absolute cure for cancer and ALL OTHER illnesses and diseases-If you are so intelligent why don't you stop world hunger and suffering? Why don't you put your mark on the world with good instead of trolling YouTube trying to convince people you are intelligent? You are an idiot and nothing more. You are a loser trying to convince folks you are something special- You re-quote yt video material-Not biology-
@fubaraoul Do you realize how many times you posted this same thing? Can't you think up something new. Don't you understand this proves you are completely ignorant of science? Do you realize how many people are laughing at you? Do you decide to troll me every time you get high and bored? You say you don't believe in God because science has refuted Him yet you show you don't know what science says. I think you couldn't care less for science- You are a mentally disturbed Antichrist-
@fubaraoul Oh well maybe I misunderstood what you said then. So you DO believe in God? It makes no sense for you to quote me- That only makes sense if what you are quoting is several pages back- If I post something and you would like to make a reply, and your reply is directly after my post, you look retarded quoting what I just posted that is plainly visible without your quote- Do you have a lack of words so you quote me to make it appear you have something to say?
shitsxxx wrote: "Oh well maybe I misunderstood what you said then. So you DO believe in God?"
There's nothing to misunderstand. I've never said anything remotely close to, "I don't believe in God because science has refuted Him...", you lying piece of shit.
shitsxxx wrote: "So you DO believe in God?"
No, you fucking retard. I don't believe in your god, or any of the gods you don't believe in.
@fubaraoul So apparently you are ignorant of science. Do you realize this video is concerning evolution. Which is considered science? Why do you troll here on a science page. Why don't you take your foolishness to a religious page? You really have nothing in your head? Why do you keep quoting me? It is clear to anyone what I just posted- You really say nothing at all- You seem to have problems forming a logical argument so you speak as a ignorant child-You really have no life at all-
shttsxxx wrote: "@fubaraoul So apparently you are ignorant of science."
You run around claiming science says light bonds matter together. You run around claiming evolution is not scientific. You're in no position to be claiming I'm ignorant of science, you stupid little cunt.
@fubaraoul When and where did I ever say evolution is not scientific? You have just been caught in another lie- Actually I said, "Do you realize this video is concerning evolution. Which is considered science?"..... Which is opposite of what you said, I said. You are nothing but a mindless liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense- You are too stupid to see how much of a fool you show yourself to be- You are so stupid there's nothing in your head-
shitsxxx wrote: "When and where did I ever say evolution is not scientific?"
In one comment on this same vid, you wrote: "Scientific Method says evolution must be observed.Science says it's impossible since it takes so long to evolve.Therefore cannot be observed."
That's merely one comment among many. You have argued AT LENGTH that evolution is not scientific, you shit kicking fuckwit.
shitsxxx wrote: "You are nothing but a mindless liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense- "
You run around claiming that science says evolution is not scientific because it can't be observed - in the face of mountains of evidence of observed evolution. You're in no position to be accusing me of being a liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense, you shit kicking fuckwit.
@fubaraoul So you are saying that you have personally observed an ape morph into a human? Interesting. Did you shoot a video of your observation? Please upload it to YouTube. Science will pay you a billion dollars for it. It is exactly what they need- That is why they produced so many fake evidences to try to show that this magical morphing can be observed- You may be a very wealthy drug addict soon. That is if you didn't pawn your camera for crack-
@fubaraoul You are a coward- Reply to me the proper way you sneaky coward. Are you so stupid you don't know what I mean by morph? Am I using too big of words for you? That is just a simple,quick way to say what everyone already knows what I mean. As I have already showed you, light bonds matter together- Maybe you would know that if you were the least bit educated- You are dumber than a moron-To call you a dolt is a compliment to what you really are- Read a book or something.
@fubaraoul You wave a "banner" that proves you are ignorant of science, then you keep posting as if anyone agrees with your uneducated ignorance- You do not know a single thing about quantum mechanics- You are fooling no one. EVERYONE can see very clearly you are completely uneducated and no one thinks for a second, that you have a clue about anything.You will fool no one but those who are dumber than you. That is NO ONE- You are nothing but a confused drug addict-
@fubaraoul OK that's what I mean you ignorant fool. It is light that holds the smallest particles together which holds everything else together- That is a quantum mechanics FACT- You keep spurting ignorance,uneducated nonsense because you do not have a clue about QM or any science for that matter- You are too much.You got me crying.You just can't get entertainment like this anywhere-You are dumb as a rock- I guess you reject everything you don't know- News flash-You don't know much of anything-
shotsxxx is a perfect example about Christian religion consists of nothing else but pathological lying, ignorance, stupidity, lack of education, arrogance, stubbornness and total refusal to get even some basic education before spurting out the nonsense he has heard from his pedopriest.
Liars for Jebus. And they call it "religion of love". LMAO
It's become a common statement that fossils are not needed any more to provide evidence for evolution.The reason is because of the understanding of DNA.The interpretation of DNA code is what is attempting to be used as evidence including observation-With only a hand full of people who can actually decipher DNA code.The dishonest prefer it this way because the average person will have no choice but to take the word of the scientist as truth.Given the history of evolution science do we want this?
Name me ONE science where there has been no frauds at all? Name me ONE. There have been frauds in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. So, according to your fundamentalist "logic", all science is wrong because of those few frauds? Poor guy, how do you manage to live in this world of massive fraud, LOL.
You are hypocrite.
Let me guess: the only one who is not fraud is your local pedopriest in church - you believe blindly every word he says?
In October of 1999 Science announced the discovery of a missing link fossil between birds and dinosaurs- THIS NOW HAS BEEN PROVED TO ALSO BE A FAKE- No fossils exist to link birds to dinosaurs as science claims is a fact. Please see "ARCHAEORAPTOR LIAONINGENESIS"- SCIENCE WILL LIE AND DECIEVE IN ANY WAY POSSIBLE TO SELL THIS FAIRY TALE CALLED EVOLUTION.
Just few days ago I explained to you that Archaeoraptor WAS NOT HOAX BY SCIENTISTS but it was constructed by FOSSIL HUNTER and he wanted to sell it to FOSSIL COLLECTORS. However, it reached the hands of scientists and they quickly identified it as consisting of two fossils, both of which were themselves valuable intermediate fossils.
Also its funny how you jump from the fact that AR was false to conclusion that there are no intermediates between reptiles and birds. Yes, there are numerous intermediate fossils between birds and reptiles, perfectly valid fossils.
Scientific Method says evolution must be observed.Science says it's impossible since it takes so long to evolve.Therefore cannot be observed.A fossil could be observed but none exist.So science says fossils are not needed because their INTERPRETATIONS are acceptable as observation-Reasons like this is why the method was created.Evolution cannot pass the method and according to method cannot be considered a fact.In fact,cannot even be considered science-It is a philosophy.Not real science-
That is the version of evolution you can read from propaganda websites of other liars for Jebus. Science does not say that evolution can not be observed because evolution IS OBSERVED both in nature and labs.
You say an artist made the fake but how do you explain it being so close to being scientifically correct it fooled other scientists for 40 years? And what about the pig tooth the intelligent scientist thought for a long time was a prehistoric human?Were none of them smart enough to know what a modern pig tooth is? They allowed it to happen at best-I make several good points and you only mention piltdown(which is still in school books)- HOW DID THE SCIENTIST NOT KNOW THE TOOTH WAS FROM A PIG?
Science has not moved on or "out grown" it's will to deceive-Science today has replaced observation with interpretations that are easier to fake-The history of a "thing" or person dictates the level of credibility given to it-The history of science producing fakes causes science to lose credibility-Just because something was "a long time ago" doesn't mean anything-It is still being taught that a piltdown being is the link between ape and human-Please go read a book.
"You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article."
Why haven't you named that article? Is it because you LIED about having read those?
@Hobu123 Do you really think it is impossible for someone to read a journal? I could post the names but that wouldn't prove I read them you silly goose- I don't lie- Again you state an opinion as a fact based on nothing-You are not so above others that your opinion is a fact-Who do you think you are?
I repeat my request - name me the title of the PEER REVIEWED scientific article about evolutionary biology you have read, and in what journal it was published. Why are you dodging?
I know why you are dodging - because you LIED about having read any. And you also know well that as soon as you name me the article, I will ask you to point out what parts of it you do not agree with, and I will ask you to present empirical evidence to back up your claims.
@Hobu123 Piltdownman was faked because there is an empty space for a missing link that would connect ape to human- Why does a REAL piltdown type skeleton NOT exist? Why is it drawings? Where are the bones? There should be thousands-You say enough evidence exists in other aspects because you cannot find just ONE piltdown type- IT NEVER HAPPENED IS WHY WE CAN't FIND ONE- Logic says we should find such, if this nonsense is true.That would be observable-NO INTERPRETATIONS- OBSERVE-
I have repeatedly said - the empirical evidence about humans and modern apes sharing a common ancestor is overwhelming even without fossils. Evidence from genetics, including ERV-s, evidence from embyrology and developmental biology, evidence from biogeography - all that shows the SAME picture. It needs a lots of religious fundamentalism to deny all that devidence.
In addition there are numerous fossils about different stages of human evolution,
I don't care what you claim to be able to do in a lab.Logic insists an authentic specimen similar to piltdown man should exist.It does not.That is why piltdown was faked.Because that would hold up evolution.Why can we not find any REAL Piltdown men? There should be thousands of them.We have so many other fossils,why not the very one you need to prove your silly philosophy.You seem to have an explanation for the evidence BEFORE the evidence is discovered-
I said - we have MANY transitional fossils about human evolution, so what is the point in your mindless repeating "there is none, there is none", like a broken parrot? Do you think that if you repeat that many times then those fossils cease to exist?
And I also explained you that there is no need for ANY fossils at all - evidence from genetics, biogeography, developmental biology ect alone are more than enough to reconstruct human evolution. Fossils is just an addition to all that.
@Hobu123 One very big problem for evolution is the fact it cannot be observed.Scientific method says it must be observed to call it a fact-You say evidence can be found in other areas other than the fossil record and is enough to prove evolution-The observance problem could be eliminated if just one trans fossil of a human was found.Find a single tooth and reconstruct an entire being based on that one tooth.Then science even goes as far as to announce the sex of the "tooth"- Hahahahahashahahaha
Nonsense. You keep repeating that nonsense like a broken parrot, while it has been repeatedly explained to you that evolution is DIRECTLY OBSERVABLE process and its studied on LIVING POPULATIONS. Those 20,000 articles per year would show you this but of course you never bother to read those.
Your posts reflect total ignorance about the most basic facts about science. Has it ever occurred to you that it really IS possible to tell the sex of tooth owner because of DNA?
We have numerous, numerous fossils about human evolution, just go and DO YOUR HOMEWORK and stop repeating the nonsense you have read from websites of religious propagandist liars.
If you want to see human fossils then GO TO YOUR LOCAL SCIENCE INSTITUTION that has department of paleontology. Or go to even some bigger museums. Or, with just few seconds you could find numerous PHOTOS about human fossils together with their analysis.
Where are they, you ask? ARE YOU BLIND or something? Nobody will be bringing them to your home, if you want to see them then MOVE YOURSELF and move it to somewhere else than just local church.
You say that you are qualified to discuss science? Sorry, but someone who says nonsensical stuff like "there is a theory called scientific method" is not qualified to discuss anything about science.
I have a scientific degree in biology, what do you have?
@Hobu123 You are a lousy liar.You have no degree.You don't even understand my point on the theory of scientific method.How could you have the understanding required to achieve any kind of degree. Why do you seem so angry.Do intelligent people cause you to lose control of your emotions?I don't get afraid of folks pretending they are angry you silly goose.Just hang on.I will make some solid points-
I LAUGH at the stupidity of religious fundies who think that they are in position of refuting all 21st century science, without even learning anything about the science. I laugh ta fundies who read some propaganda website of a pedopriest and then imagine that they have discovered information that overthrows all knows science :D
Yes, I HAVE a scientific degree, earned through hard work. Do the same and then talk.
@Hobu123 What you call evidence is nothing more than an interpretation. To say the theory of evolution is so strong that fossil evidence can be ignored is very foolish and unscientific-These interpretations are possibilities that biased and shallow minded people accept as fact.According to scientific method,they are not facts at all.The very thing that could produce a fact,you say is not needed.You are wrong.Evolution needs as much evidence as it can produce.Not what you THINK it means-
What do YOU know about the evidence of evolution, considering the fact that you haven't bothered to read any of those 20,000 scientific articles that are published EVERY YEAR about it?
It's becoming a popular statement in science to claim these fossils are not needed.The ONLY reason this is stated is because not one single fossil of this type exists-The study mentioned is the attempt to find a fossil-If that was ever discovered the entire science community would boast it proves evolution to be absolute-Until then they will say it has no bearing on the philosophy-Why can't we find just one skeleton fossil of a transitional human?
Evolution, being directly observable and testable process, observed in nature and in labs, does not need any fossils.
EVERY YEAR biologists publish around 20,000 (yes, TWENTY THOUSAND) peer reviewed scientific articles about their research and discoveries in evolutionary biology.
That you have not bothered to read even one of those articles is really not science's fault.
Also, if you fail to understand the most basic fact - that every fossil is transitional - then you are really not the one who should be discussing evolutionary biology.
@Hobu123 I don't fail to understand anything on this topic.And to say all fossils are transitions is not a fact.At best it is a biased interpretation because of the lack of real evidence-I am more qualified to discuss this topic than you seem to be-I seem to be more scientific than you.Maybe you shouldn't discuss biology.I don't call a thing a fact unless scientific method dictates it so- Show me a trans fossil of a human that is NOT a drawing-There should be millions.Where are they?
You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article.''
What you claimed is absurd. There are numerous examples of evolution observed both in labs and in nature. Why do you live in denialism? You could easily go and read about that research.
>>>>There is a theory called scientific method
What exactly is that supposed to mean? Are you crazy?
We have numerous, numerous fossils about human evolution, just go and DO YOUR HOMEWORK and stop repeating the nonsense you have read from websites of religious propagandist liars.
If you want to see human fossils then GO TO YOUR LOCAL SCIENCE INSTITUTION that has department of paleontology. Or go to even some bigger museums. Or, with just few seconds you could find numerous PHOTOS about human fossils together with their analysis.
@Hobu123 "Stone Age Discoveries of Shinich Fujimura"(exposed Nov.2000) -"Piltdown Chicken"(Oct.1999) -"The Sokl Hoax"(May1996) -"Margaret Mead and the Samoans"(1928) -"The Case of the Midwife Toad"(1926) - "Piltdown Man"(1912) -"Appletons Cyclopedia of American Biography"(exposed1919) -"The Taughannock Giant"(1879) -"The Calaveras Skull"(1866) -"The Charlton Brimstone Butterfly"- THESE ARE FAKE EVIDENCES PRODUCED BY SCIENCE.WHY ARE FAKES NEEDED IF YOU ARE CORRECT?
Nobody NEEDS any fakes. Just like EVERYWHERE ELSE TOO, in every field of human activities, there occasionally appear people who fake stuff in science too.
However, all these frauds have been exposed by SCIENTISTS, many of them immediately.
"Piltdown chicken" was NOT fraud by scientists. It was put together by the Chinese fossil hunter who discovered it, and he assembled the the pieces were assembled to make the fossil more marketable to collectors, not to researchers. It happened to go to scientists' hands and after examining the fossil it soon became clear for scientists that it is not real.
However, the two fossils it was conctructed from are themselves both valuable transitional fossils.
@Hobu123 I have researched my claims completely.You are not my authority on this.Please stop asserting yourself as such-It doesn't matter who produced the evidence.Science should have known these were fake.Can science claim to know how the world and all living things came to be but cannot tell the difference between a pig tooth and a human tooth?An artist may have produced the fakes but science went along with the hoax or either science is not as capable as many people believe- Incompetent?
Nebraska man was not a hoax, it was a MISTAKE. Learn to know the difference between those two. Scientists can make mistakes.
However, look at the YEAR when "Nebraska man" was discovered. 1922! Don't you think that at those times long ago when there was no DNA analysis, no electronmicroskopes etc, it was hard to distinguish pig and human tooth because pig and human teeth ARE very similar.
@Hobu123 There are some very honest evolution scientists that would expose fake evidence.But there are still too many that would fake evidence-Sure most of the time it is done for funding.Evolution is a subject of study that generates a lot of money-The people producing these fakes does not have a love of science.They love the money.Problem is more theories are built upon the evidence.Remember,the fakes are also considered evidence b4 they are exposed but other theories are formed and remain-
Nonsensical conspiracy theory that has nothing to do with reality.
Do you really believe that millions of professional scientists from all around the world all participate in some massive fraud in order to earn money? You really are delusional.
There are 20,000 valid peer reviewed scientific articles published per year about evolution and you bring up couple of fakes from 19th century as "evidence" that science is conspiracy?
@Hobu123 "Many frauds are exposed immediately"... Unless we decide to teach them as legitimate evidence for 40 years in schools everywhere-I suspect sometime in the future, what you say is absolute evidence,will be said science doesn't need anymore to prove evolution-When we find out these interpretations are fake evidence well say it still doesn't even matter because of the theories built upon the fake evidence-It is much easier to fake an interpretation than a skeleton-
@Hobu123 To suggest I have not read any science journals is ignorance on your part-A poodle from a wolf is the ONLY type of evolution observed in the lab-You cannot recreate and observe the evolution from ape to man-There is a theory called scientific method that I suspect you have no understanding of-An interpretation is NOT observance- We at least need just ONE fossil that is BONES and not a drawing based on an interpretation of a small fragment the size of a dime-We can't even find just one?
You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article.''
What you claimed is absurd. There are numerous examples
why are u disliking this! it is his/her first video!!! understand now?!
matthewhighley66 2 months ago
The only way that Evolution seems plausible to Atheists is because of the time process involved..What if Evolution occurred in a day?, a reptile transforming into a Human Being!...Would we not see Atheists calling that a Supernatural Belief and therefore can not believe that such a thing can happen!
ImagesByDavid 6 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Of course not, because we DON'T see that. If indeed we did see evolution functioning that fast, we'd revise evolution. If we saw a creator deity doing it all by tugging on little strings connected to every particle in the universe, THEN we'd give you more credence.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
See with your heart not with your eyes.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid I would if my heart could see anything beyond my lungs and ribcage. My eyes are far better at seeing what's right in front of me.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
Romans 1:20
"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse"
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Clearly seen by who? When? Where? Show me what has apparently been clearly observed.
Also you're quoting the Bible, that's a big debating no-no, its sources are unknown and its credibility feeble at best.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyindmon
Quoting the Bible to those who believe in an Almighty Creator is more credible than anything you can produce. Such an Almighty Creator revealed Himself to Men and through His Son Jesus Christ. The sources are known and the Book of Acts was written two years after the Crucifixion of Jesus. A time in history that has been recorded by Jewish historians. Prophecies of the future have come to pass that only a Creator could know.
To answer your Questions, Men, many thousands ago, Earth
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Quoting an object of obsession to the obsessed, yes, it would seem very plausible. Additionally, Judaism is the predecessor of Christianity, and features, I kid you not, teleporting priests in its mythology. Present evidence, something testable, verifiable, and above all observable, or else there is naught.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
Teleporting priests please reference.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid There are certain portions of the Torah where a known priest is mentioned, but could not have been at a given location based on the dates given and the distance between two locations. As such, certain priests are said to have been gifted by the divine with the ability to teleport. Islam has a similar tradition within the Quran called Tay al-Ard
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
Can you reference these certain portions in the Torah?
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid It's not specific, they're vague references here and there, and the Torah is a big book. I'd need to cite events involving about thirty different priests to establish their whereabouts and dates and the inconsistencies in order to also verify their possession of teleportation abilities. Religious texts tend to have inconsistencies like this, the Bible alone skips a good decade of Jesus' teen life.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
Well go ahead and find the reference to prove your statement because right now its only lies you are speaking.
You deflect from that and speak about the teen years of Jesus been missing but the Apostles DID NOT KNOW Jesus as a teenager.
You heard things about the Bible that weren't true and said with an agenda to destroy and now you are a mouth piece for these people.
But do prove me wrong and show references to your statement.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Upon further research, the teleporting priests are an Islamic tradition, not a Jewish one, apologies.
They didn't write about his teen years because they didn't know him then...but they wrote about his childhood and birth...strange. There's also the Dead Sea Scrolls which indicate that the Bible is not only incomplete but purposefully edited in its near-original state, a state which has then been translated through several languages AND further edited towards political purposes.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
the Birth of Jesus was foretold and dont you think that the Apostles would have discussed the Birth of Jesus with His mother Mary and even with Himself Jesus. No need to complicate things for yourself.
The Dead Sea Scrolls matches up with todays Torah.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Perhaps its something I missed in Sunday school, but I distinctly recall the entire nativity being "Who is this baby and why should I care? Oh wait, angels and stars, alright." I'd imagine it'd be quite different if things had actually been foreseen.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Whatever the Bible was, if it was ever the actual word of god written down by man, it isn't anymore. Nothing in it today can be taken as credible.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
2 Timothy 3:16-17
"All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work"
The Writings in the Bible are transforming people everyday. Throughout the world from Lima to Moscow, Sydney to London, Tehran to Nairobi people are testifying to the Supernatural power of the Gospel.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid You have now ceased to be debating this topic and are now just evangelising. I will give you credit for last almost a day, most theists don't.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyimon
You come at me with lies and you said so yourself. Who confuses the Bible with the Quran in discussions?
Then you started on the Bible which I went to respond and now you say
"You have now ceased to be debating this topic"
tut tut you see my photographic work via my website given to me by Jesus through prayer. You want to become a good artist then surrender your worldly knowledge & let God bless you.
The Birth of Jesus was prophesied many hundreds of years before it happened.
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid Your photography is irrelevant. It does not show any evidence to support the existence of God, the validity of Jesus Christ as his son or mankind's savior, or the credibility of the Bible.
You take those photographs, your hand guides the framing, your eye the lighting and your brain the arrangement. That you attribute them instead to a man confirmed by your own holy text as dead over two thousand years ago is a sign of delusion, not truth.
God is dead, long live humankind.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
@Lyinginbedmon
You ignored the point with the photography was it came about from a prayer and what you viewed are world press standard photography.
Matthew 7:7
"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you"
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
@ImagesByDavid So because it's good photography, it must be divine inspiration?
Have you ever considered that you might actually be a good photographer? Surely not everyone with world standard abilities is divinely-touched.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Lyinginbedmon
Matthew 7:7
"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you"
ImagesByDavid 5 months ago
black man doesn't seemed to have evolved at all. You have to admit, setting aside political correctness for 5 seconds alot of the most primitive pictures of cavemen there do look like niggers and are just as primitive as niggers in africa to the present day
peeweecx 6 months ago
yea but what came before the monkey is what I don't get..
umtydnoia 11 months ago
@umtydnoia Rodents, rats, shrews ect.
5starrockdude 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The natural order of life's genomes is to go from a state of order to less order. A simple brain does not evolve into a complex brain. See Cornell University's Dr. John Sanford, Genetic Entropy and The Mystery of The Genome. The human genome is deteriorating via the accumulation of mutations. Overall, mutations have the sum impact of being deleterious. Macro evolution is a fairy tale. Atheism is moronic.
achilles197474 11 months ago
@achilles197474 wrote: "A simple brain does not evolve into a complex brain."
Speak for yourself, retard.
achilles wrote: "See... Dr. John Sanford..."
Another intellectual who, as he inches closer to death, has latched on to the judeo-christian superstition because it promises him eternal life. No different than any other intellectual who claims alliance with any other religion which offers the same promise...
... and certainly not a convincing argument for intelligent design.
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul Sanford - 25 genetic patents including the gene gun. Your ad hominem attack only proves that you have nothing to refute his evidence that the human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase.
achilles197474 11 months ago
@achilles197474 wrote: "@fubaraoul Sanford - 25 genetic patents including the gene gun."
Like I said, the man is clearly intelligent. Here's the thing: He didn't patent anything that proves evolution (specifically, speciation) is false, you fucking moron.
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@achilles197474 wrote: "... you have nothing to refute his evidence that the human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase."
"The human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase" is a meaningless string of fancy words simple minded fucks like yourself swallow without question because it comes from someone who shares your particular religious delusion, which pretty much precludes there being any evidence for the claim.
In other words, there's nothing to refute, you fucking moron.
fubaraoul 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@achilles197474
"nothing to refute his evidence that the human genome is deteriorating as mutations increase"
How about 99.9% of experts who disagree with him?
IS that somthing that refutes his crap?
HOW ABOUT EVOLVING IMMUNITY TO HIV?
Is that detoriating? Explain LOL
gorilla199uncensored 11 months ago
Now it all makes sense.... we were monkey's and ape's.... (fart sound)
MadeInOregon27 11 months ago
hey,,,, sons of monkeys
go back to hell
& We (sons of Adam-peace be upon him-) will be in Heaven
by ALLAH's will
1111111111sword 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"WE NOW KNOW FROM OUR UNDERSTANDING OF QUANTUM MECHANICS THAT LIGHT IS THE FORCE THAT KEEPS ELECTRONS TIED TO THE NUCLEI OF ATOMS AND ATOMS TIED TOGETHER TO MAKE MOLECULES AND THEN FINALLY, OBJECTS" Go read a book if you can actually read. Study or something- You are very ignorant and foolish and you don't seem to mind if the entire world knows-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
YOU HAVE THE MIND OF AN IMMATURE CHILD. I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU. YOU MUST BE REALLY CONFUSED IN LIFE- IT IS OK TO SEEK MEDICAL HELP_
shotsxxx 11 months ago
Watch how biblical cretinist Hovind claims that "water stops x-rays" (ROFLMAO!) and claims that "aging is caused by x-rays" (ROFLMAO!):
YKdfeP1sGIg
Idiots are your mentors, lol.
Hobu123 11 months ago
i didnt know we evolved in a nutshell. wtf?
dreadedwheat26 11 months ago
In The Name of Allah (God) The Most Gracious The Most Merciful
75:(36) Does man think that he will be left uncontrolled, (without purpose)?
(37) Was he not a drop of sperm emitted (in lowly form)?
(38) Then did he become a leech-like clot; then did (Allah) make and fashion (him) in due proportion.
(39) And of him He made two sexes, male and female.
(40) Has not He, (the same), the power to give life to the dead?
77705000000000000000 11 months ago
@nonignorat i always wondered that to thats why sometimes i dont believe in evolution
but these scientists are saying these are facts
WTFCashMoney 11 months ago
RELIGION IS DIEING, EVOLUTION IS THE WAY FORWARD. SEE WHAT I DID THAR? LOL ANYWAY I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY MY GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GRANDAD USED TO CLIMB TREES LIKE A NIGGER.
Gn00bie 11 months ago
I don't like humans so much anymore.
Kristalisthebest 11 months ago
if thats how human were made then why dont todays monkey become human?
nonignorat 11 months ago
@nonignorat why are you retarded
hvutrong 11 months ago
@nonignorat Are you serious? Or are you just another religion/athiest troll?
Roffeskanal 11 months ago
@nonignorat epic elementary school biology comprehend FAIL!
OmfgItsHenu 11 months ago
@nonignorat why should they? they can easily reproduce the way they are, they are competitive enough to survive. you're assuming that humans are "better" than monkeys. in evolution, "better" means more able to survive and reproduce.
DaMastaOfRoad 11 months ago
@nonignorat
Because the theory of evolution is a pure fantasy.
Evidence for the theory of evolution doesn't exist.
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes Exactly. The human form and soul coming about from monkeys is a ZIONIST LIE; just like feminism, multiculturalism, anti-racism, homosexual rights, etc. It is used to help eliminate our morals, all racial distinctions, and people's faith in God. Also, the various race groups are completely different. The idea that the black Africans traveled to all four corners of Europe, magically transformed into white people, and then created all of our music, art and technology is beyond crazy.
silverlinetheclouds 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes
What about those 20,000 peer reviewed scientific articles that are published by professional scientists about research and discoveries in field of evolutionary biology EVERY YEAR?
You know, those 20,000 articles per year out of which you have not bothered to read even ONE?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@nonignorat Because modern apes are not the apes we evolved from, they are a different species that branched off just as we did. In short, they are neither the creatures we came from nor are they in the same conditions that caused our evolution, but we are related to them, as cousins, not descendants.
Lyinginbedmon 5 months ago
The test of any theory is whether or not it provides answers to basic questions. Some well-meaning but misguided people think evolution is a reasonable theory to explain man’s questions about the universe. Evolution is not a good theory—it is just a pagan religion masquerading as science.
SwordofSpirit1 11 months ago
@SwordofSpirit1 evolution is fact the theory of evolution explores how it works not if it exist
keaverkite 11 months ago
@SwordofSpirit1 evolution is based of evidence not blind faith like you deluded religionist
keaverkite 11 months ago
@SwordofSpirit1
A theory in science is the entire body of work that describes a specific phenomenon, a hypothesis that has been verified through testing.
keaverkite 11 months ago
@SwordofSpirit1 It's not a pagan religion because it isnt polytheistic
TubaGlider2 11 months ago
The Dare Island Enigma is a novel concerning an alternative view of evolution see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
Outerghost, please remove this video. Both the video content and video description are misleading and portray evolution incorrectly.
Since there's no reason on Earth why someone who wants to educate through the medium of video would want his videos to misinform, so too is there no reason for leaving this up.
ihaterobbie123 1 year ago
Hey Outerghost, you may already know this, but those modern primates you show at the beginning are not ancestors of humans, but evolutionary "cousins". Though its true that some early ancestors of humans probably looked a lot like chimps.
Otherwise nice video, much better than that creationist junk. Cheers!
aristarkus1 1 year ago
To even attempt and fathom the the universe or our creation is POINTLESS. We are such tiny little particles in this massive space and we are here for such short time that by even thinking about this stuff you are wasting time.
stomperfood 1 year ago
@stomperfood When people carry out a task with no real reward in completion, like playing a video game, you usually do it to have fun while you're doing it. This can even be said of things that do have rewards. The journey is often reward enough in it's self, the actual reward is just gravy sometimes.
In this respect, what task could be better than the pursuit of knowledge?
Oicurmtoyoy 1 year ago
@Oicurmtoyoy "In this respect, what task could be better than the pursuit of knowledge?"
The task of metabolising all the heroine on the planet, personally.
ihaterobbie123 1 year ago
you all stupid to say humans from apes. why the stupid evolution is not happening now, if evolution is true means why the idiot evolution stop within humans ,why humans not turn to any monsters. evolution is 100 % sure not possible for humans.
we are humans not from apes,just think deep,u will got the answer who we are? apes are similar to us in structure but not in brain, only life cycles happened in earth.
dinosaurs,mammals, humans with other life system. dont believe we from monkey
sounza 1 year ago
@sounza May people say we came from apes. but that's not true. we came from something similar to apes. and the only reason that evolution has stop is because we as humans rely to much on technology. we don't walk as much, due to cars. we don't swim as much because of boats. we don't talk as much because of the Internet. we are not as active as our ancestors. I'm not saying technology is bad. i rely on technology just as much as anyone else. but then again this is only my point of view.
MrJuangonzo 1 year ago
@MrJuangonzo do one thing take some kids and keep in secret place without any communication,just go back after 25 years and look at them,they seems like apes,with long hairs,big mails,strange teeth's and not much thinking sense ,so cant say we from animals, humans take more time to learn his brain power- 2 million years.we doesn't had guidance on 2million years but we learned everything by practice.
sounza 1 year ago
@MrJuangonzo our elders says humans move from animal behavior to science but we people mistake it that we from apes.
sounza 1 year ago
@MrJuangonzo That's wrong, evolution has stopped because of medicine and our view of what we believe to be deformities or mutations. We have put a stop to almost all diseases that single us out in the form of natural selection. Being our bodies assimilate to our surroundings and what we force them to go through, science should take a long look at the birth control pill and how that might effect genetic strands that consistently use it for several centuries! Evolution to extinction!
tBusket 1 year ago
@tBusket So evolution was stopped because of thing man created. and our point of view of normal and deformations. @sounza so over the course of 2 million years the human brain became more complex, human started learning to us tool and create things to help with their everyday life.
MrJuangonzo 1 year ago
@MrJuangonzo The opposing thumb was a genetic mutation! That mutation allowed for that primate to have physical control over what could be used as tools/weapons giving that primate the advantage to out-survive the rest and pass on that genetic mutation...which is evolution! Today we have the ability to cure diseases that some can live with and some can't, allowing the weaker to survive in a world of evolution that has brought us here by survival of the fittest! I never said it was a bad thing!
tBusket 1 year ago
@tBusket Let just agree that is a very interesting topic to talk about.
MrJuangonzo 1 year ago
Hey, If you are happy and proud that you are the descendents of a bunch of dumb, maggot infested, ass sniffing monkeys more power to you.
rpminc12 1 year ago
@rpminc12
Sorry to burst your bubble, but REALITY does not care about what you WANT to believe. You share common ancestor with apes, whether you like it or not, and no amount of moaning will change that fact.
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123 " You share common ancestor with apes, whether you like it or not, and no amount of moaning will change that fact." You do, not me. You can snif assholes and grub for ticks all you want. !!!
rpminc12 11 months ago
@rpminc12
You are not a human being then? Who are you, a Xenomorph?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123 I don't speak monkey, so i can see life is a big question for you !!!
rpminc12 11 months ago
@rpminc12
I asked you, are you a Xenomorph or not?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123 If i send you a couple of bananas and few peanuts will that help?
rpminc12 11 months ago
@rpminc12
Dodging much like usual biblical cretinist when asked direct questions?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123 Are you still swinging around ?
rpminc12 11 months ago
"COUPLE" of fakes..... Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
shotsxxx 1 year ago
shotsxxx, do you really fail to understand that when you keep repeating "evolution can not be observed" you make everyone who knows anything about evolution roll on the floor laughing?
Everyone who knows anything about evolution knows how it is being observed and tested. So basically your moaning is the same as if you went to astronomer and said that stars do not exist, despite the fact that he sees them every day.
LMAO
Geting education is what you should do next.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 We don't need science to tell us if something is observed or not,we simply observe it if it can be.Well....maybe some of you need someone to tell you what something looks like so you don't have to look for yourself.I guess everything is propaganda if it shows something different than your opinion and brainwash-I made my points.Only a fool would disregard them.And you still insist you have said something correct.I will not respond to so many posts.A fool speaks with many words.
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@Hobu123 You seem to think people need you to tell them if science is correct or not.Anyone can check out what I said and think for themselves and see the truth.We don't need anyone to explain what is obvious-You have no education.You only repeat what you have been programed to think.Be a good little robot and don't think for yourself.Look silly and stupid.Just don't use logic or reason just say you do, then proclaim YOURSELF intelligent because nobody else will- Hahahahaha loser !!!!!!!
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Sorry, but I have scientific degree in field of biology, which automatically also means that I have studied lots of science while you have studied NOTHING.
If you only bothered to educate yourself at least a bit, you would start to discover the wonderful world and gain knowledge about evolutionary biology. But you won't educate yourself because you prefer your idiotic Bronze Age fairytale about hocus-pocus-jebus flying around you.
Hobu123 11 months ago
So, lets do a quick check.
1) All empirical evidence from all fields of biosciencse showing the same thing - life evolves.
2) No evidence found that contradicts that.
3) All creationist "arguments" are easily refutable by anyone who has bothered to get some education.
Considering all that, is there any reason why someone should abandon reality and accept the retarded nonsense by Bronze Age goatherders?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123
I read many articles over the years. That's how I know that all of them are superficial descriptive stories. They also said that it take millions of years for making the coal. But in laboratory, coal is produced in 1 hour.
If you proved in laboratory condition that bacteria evolves into higher being, I will believe.
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes
Name me one peer reviewed scientific article you have read.
It is obvious that you have read none of them because "peer rewieved scientific article" is NOT a "descriptive story". It is overview about the research conducted, together with exact methodology used, what material was collected, how it was analyzed, what results were gained, how these results were analyzed and what conclusions can be drawn from them. Presented in a way that allows you to do the same research again.
Hobu123 11 months ago
These descriptions you read from educational sources are NOT peer reviewed scientific articles.
Also there is no doubt that coal deposits have formed over long time. The evidence of it is in them. Mostly coal layers are found in sedimentary rocks deposited in flood plains. They often contain stream channels, roots, and soil horizons. So it doesnt matter how quickly you can form coal in lab, the evidence in natural coal deposits shows that they have not formed quickly.
Hobu123 11 months ago
Often there are many layers of coal above each other, each of them containing their own many tree and footprint horizons, soil layers, plant root remains etc. It is impossible for these all to form quickly as it takes time for forests to grow and those layers to form.
Hobu123 11 months ago
Since evolutionary biology does not claim that bacteria overnight evolves into "higher being", your request is nonsensical and absurd. Perfect example of creationist dishonesty.
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123
Stop being an idiot and please watch Kent Hovind's videos:
"The Age of the Earth", "The Garden of Eden", "Dinosaurs and the Bible", "The Hovind Theory"
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes
Yawn, seen them. Boring. The amount of retarded nonsense in those vides is amazing, and brainwashed religioidiots watch with eyes wide and believe every piece of that crap, although every schoolchild can refute all Hovind's nonsense, it just needsa bit of education to do it (you don't need to be scientist to refute Hovinds retarded crap).
You take your "science" from a man who thinks that sound waves are part of electromagnetic spectrum, ROFLMAO!
Hobu123 11 months ago
Seriously, if you want to surprise me with anything then you need to try much harder than suggesting me to watch the videos of one of the most idiotic persons on planet Earth. Kent Hovind... LMAO. The idiot who speaks so much nonsense that even OTHER CREATIONISTS distance themselves from him.
Look how Hovind contradicts in his own "arguments": l6_o1GxgNMQ
"Why do people laugh at creationists?" is a series for you to watch in youtube.
Hobu123 11 months ago
When Hovind seriously claims that one drop of water is enough to cover whole Earth, doesn't it REALLY generate any doubt in your brain that he may be idiot? One drop of water only contains limited amount of molecules and the thinnest layer you can create is monolayer. To cover Earth with monolayer of water molecules you need 150,000 tons of water, not just "one drop" as Hovind claims.
And people like you still blindly absorb his retarded crap.
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123
Well, refute them.
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes
Sure
Which one of them?
Hobu123 11 months ago
@Hobu123
Radiocarbon dating and potassium-argon dating is a false science.
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes Why is that ?
nickrambus 11 months ago
@nickrambus
Because anything is never dated correctly.
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@TheOpendEyes Your mouth has evolved way beyond your "eyes' and brain.
rpminc12 11 months ago
@rpminc12
Really? How's that?
TheOpendEyes 11 months ago
@Hobu123 A "scientific" degree? AUTOMATICALLY? "I have studied NOTHING?" You are a dolt. I guess you think since you have this "automatic" right to say you are correct and everyone else who disagrees is wrong- Hahaha what a fool- You have no clue who I am or my credentials. Anyone with a real degree can know by your wording and implications of your wordings that in fact, You do not have a degree and that you are only a poor uneducated YouTube troll pretending what you are not - (p1)
shotsxxx 11 months ago
@Hobu123 If you are so educated why don't you do something worth while like formulate an absolute cure for cancer and ALL OTHER illnesses and diseases-If you are so intelligent why don't you stop world hunger and suffering? Why don't you put your mark on the world with good instead of trolling YouTube trying to convince people you are intelligent? You are an idiot and nothing more. You are a loser trying to convince folks you are something special- You re-quote yt video material-Not biology-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "Why don't you put your mark on the world with good instead of trolling YouTube trying to convince people you are intelligent?"
This from the fucktard running around claiming light is what bonds matter together.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul Do you realize how many times you posted this same thing? Can't you think up something new. Don't you understand this proves you are completely ignorant of science? Do you realize how many people are laughing at you? Do you decide to troll me every time you get high and bored? You say you don't believe in God because science has refuted Him yet you show you don't know what science says. I think you couldn't care less for science- You are a mentally disturbed Antichrist-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "You say you don't believe in God because science has refuted Him..."
I've never said any such thing, you lying piece of shit.
shitsxxx wrote: "... yet you show you don't know what science says."
This from the fucktard running around claiming science says light bonds matter together.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul Oh well maybe I misunderstood what you said then. So you DO believe in God? It makes no sense for you to quote me- That only makes sense if what you are quoting is several pages back- If I post something and you would like to make a reply, and your reply is directly after my post, you look retarded quoting what I just posted that is plainly visible without your quote- Do you have a lack of words so you quote me to make it appear you have something to say?
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "Oh well maybe I misunderstood what you said then. So you DO believe in God?"
There's nothing to misunderstand. I've never said anything remotely close to, "I don't believe in God because science has refuted Him...", you lying piece of shit.
shitsxxx wrote: "So you DO believe in God?"
No, you fucking retard. I don't believe in your god, or any of the gods you don't believe in.
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul So apparently you are ignorant of science. Do you realize this video is concerning evolution. Which is considered science? Why do you troll here on a science page. Why don't you take your foolishness to a religious page? You really have nothing in your head? Why do you keep quoting me? It is clear to anyone what I just posted- You really say nothing at all- You seem to have problems forming a logical argument so you speak as a ignorant child-You really have no life at all-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shttsxxx wrote: "@fubaraoul So apparently you are ignorant of science."
You run around claiming science says light bonds matter together. You run around claiming evolution is not scientific. You're in no position to be claiming I'm ignorant of science, you stupid little cunt.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul When and where did I ever say evolution is not scientific? You have just been caught in another lie- Actually I said, "Do you realize this video is concerning evolution. Which is considered science?"..... Which is opposite of what you said, I said. You are nothing but a mindless liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense- You are too stupid to see how much of a fool you show yourself to be- You are so stupid there's nothing in your head-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "When and where did I ever say evolution is not scientific?"
In one comment on this same vid, you wrote: "Scientific Method says evolution must be observed.Science says it's impossible since it takes so long to evolve.Therefore cannot be observed."
That's merely one comment among many. You have argued AT LENGTH that evolution is not scientific, you shit kicking fuckwit.
fubaraoul 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "You are nothing but a mindless liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense- "
You run around claiming that science says evolution is not scientific because it can't be observed - in the face of mountains of evidence of observed evolution. You're in no position to be accusing me of being a liar with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense, you shit kicking fuckwit.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul So you are saying that you have personally observed an ape morph into a human? Interesting. Did you shoot a video of your observation? Please upload it to YouTube. Science will pay you a billion dollars for it. It is exactly what they need- That is why they produced so many fake evidences to try to show that this magical morphing can be observed- You may be a very wealthy drug addict soon. That is if you didn't pawn your camera for crack-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "@fubaraoul So you are saying that you have personally observed an ape morph into a human?"
Evolutionary theory does not propose that apes morph into humans, you shit kicking fuckwit.
And I'm the one "with absolutely no knowledge of science or common sense."
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul Hahahahahahaha You are dumber than dirt !!!!!!!!!
shotsxxx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shitsxxx wrote: "@fubaraoul Hahahahahahaha You are dumber than dirt !!!!!!!!!"
This from the shit kicker claiming ToE states that apes morph into humans, and that light bonds matter together.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul You are a coward- Reply to me the proper way you sneaky coward. Are you so stupid you don't know what I mean by morph? Am I using too big of words for you? That is just a simple,quick way to say what everyone already knows what I mean. As I have already showed you, light bonds matter together- Maybe you would know that if you were the least bit educated- You are dumber than a moron-To call you a dolt is a compliment to what you really are- Read a book or something.
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shitsxxx wrote: "Are you so stupid you don't know what I mean by morph?"
You keep using the word like YOU know what it means. Clearly you don't.
lulz...
shitsxxx wrote: "As I have already showed you, light bonds matter together-"
You CAN'T show such a thing, because such a thing is demonstrably false, you shit kicking fucktard.
lulz
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul You wave a "banner" that proves you are ignorant of science, then you keep posting as if anyone agrees with your uneducated ignorance- You do not know a single thing about quantum mechanics- You are fooling no one. EVERYONE can see very clearly you are completely uneducated and no one thinks for a second, that you have a clue about anything.You will fool no one but those who are dumber than you. That is NO ONE- You are nothing but a confused drug addict-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
shotsxxx wrote: "You do not know a single thing about quantum mechanics-"
This from the fucktard running around claiming QT states that light bonds matter together.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
@fubaraoul OK that's what I mean you ignorant fool. It is light that holds the smallest particles together which holds everything else together- That is a quantum mechanics FACT- You keep spurting ignorance,uneducated nonsense because you do not have a clue about QM or any science for that matter- You are too much.You got me crying.You just can't get entertainment like this anywhere-You are dumb as a rock- I guess you reject everything you don't know- News flash-You don't know much of anything-
shotsxxx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shitsxxx wrote: "It is light that holds the smallest particles together which holds everything else together- That is a quantum mechanics FACT-"
No, that is NOT "a quantum mechanics FACT," you fucktard.
lulz...
fubaraoul 11 months ago
shotsxxx is a perfect example about Christian religion consists of nothing else but pathological lying, ignorance, stupidity, lack of education, arrogance, stubbornness and total refusal to get even some basic education before spurting out the nonsense he has heard from his pedopriest.
Liars for Jebus. And they call it "religion of love". LMAO
Hobu123 1 year ago
It's become a common statement that fossils are not needed any more to provide evidence for evolution.The reason is because of the understanding of DNA.The interpretation of DNA code is what is attempting to be used as evidence including observation-With only a hand full of people who can actually decipher DNA code.The dishonest prefer it this way because the average person will have no choice but to take the word of the scientist as truth.Given the history of evolution science do we want this?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Name me ONE science where there has been no frauds at all? Name me ONE. There have been frauds in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. So, according to your fundamentalist "logic", all science is wrong because of those few frauds? Poor guy, how do you manage to live in this world of massive fraud, LOL.
You are hypocrite.
Let me guess: the only one who is not fraud is your local pedopriest in church - you believe blindly every word he says?
Hobu123 1 year ago
In October of 1999 Science announced the discovery of a missing link fossil between birds and dinosaurs- THIS NOW HAS BEEN PROVED TO ALSO BE A FAKE- No fossils exist to link birds to dinosaurs as science claims is a fact. Please see "ARCHAEORAPTOR LIAONINGENESIS"- SCIENCE WILL LIE AND DECIEVE IN ANY WAY POSSIBLE TO SELL THIS FAIRY TALE CALLED EVOLUTION.
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
You are religious fundamentalist LIAR.
Just few days ago I explained to you that Archaeoraptor WAS NOT HOAX BY SCIENTISTS but it was constructed by FOSSIL HUNTER and he wanted to sell it to FOSSIL COLLECTORS. However, it reached the hands of scientists and they quickly identified it as consisting of two fossils, both of which were themselves valuable intermediate fossils.
I EXPLAINED THAT TO YOU.
WHY DO YOU KEEP LYING TO PEOPLE?
Hobu123 1 year ago
Also its funny how you jump from the fact that AR was false to conclusion that there are no intermediates between reptiles and birds. Yes, there are numerous intermediate fossils between birds and reptiles, perfectly valid fossils.
Why do you keep lying to people?
Hobu123 1 year ago
Scientific Method says evolution must be observed.Science says it's impossible since it takes so long to evolve.Therefore cannot be observed.A fossil could be observed but none exist.So science says fossils are not needed because their INTERPRETATIONS are acceptable as observation-Reasons like this is why the method was created.Evolution cannot pass the method and according to method cannot be considered a fact.In fact,cannot even be considered science-It is a philosophy.Not real science-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Actually is a scientific myth roaming every single classroom all over the world, unfortunatelly it´s taught as science
realhomosapiens 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
That is the version of evolution you can read from propaganda websites of other liars for Jebus. Science does not say that evolution can not be observed because evolution IS OBSERVED both in nature and labs.
GET SOME BASIC EDUCATION.
Hobu123 1 year ago
You say an artist made the fake but how do you explain it being so close to being scientifically correct it fooled other scientists for 40 years? And what about the pig tooth the intelligent scientist thought for a long time was a prehistoric human?Were none of them smart enough to know what a modern pig tooth is? They allowed it to happen at best-I make several good points and you only mention piltdown(which is still in school books)- HOW DID THE SCIENTIST NOT KNOW THE TOOTH WAS FROM A PIG?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
Science has not moved on or "out grown" it's will to deceive-Science today has replaced observation with interpretations that are easier to fake-The history of a "thing" or person dictates the level of credibility given to it-The history of science producing fakes causes science to lose credibility-Just because something was "a long time ago" doesn't mean anything-It is still being taught that a piltdown being is the link between ape and human-Please go read a book.
shotsxxx 1 year ago
And let me remind you my previous request:
"You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article."
Why haven't you named that article? Is it because you LIED about having read those?
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 Do you really think it is impossible for someone to read a journal? I could post the names but that wouldn't prove I read them you silly goose- I don't lie- Again you state an opinion as a fact based on nothing-You are not so above others that your opinion is a fact-Who do you think you are?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
I repeat my request - name me the title of the PEER REVIEWED scientific article about evolutionary biology you have read, and in what journal it was published. Why are you dodging?
I know why you are dodging - because you LIED about having read any. And you also know well that as soon as you name me the article, I will ask you to point out what parts of it you do not agree with, and I will ask you to present empirical evidence to back up your claims.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 Piltdownman was faked because there is an empty space for a missing link that would connect ape to human- Why does a REAL piltdown type skeleton NOT exist? Why is it drawings? Where are the bones? There should be thousands-You say enough evidence exists in other aspects because you cannot find just ONE piltdown type- IT NEVER HAPPENED IS WHY WE CAN't FIND ONE- Logic says we should find such, if this nonsense is true.That would be observable-NO INTERPRETATIONS- OBSERVE-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Broken parrot.
I have repeatedly said - the empirical evidence about humans and modern apes sharing a common ancestor is overwhelming even without fossils. Evidence from genetics, including ERV-s, evidence from embyrology and developmental biology, evidence from biogeography - all that shows the SAME picture. It needs a lots of religious fundamentalism to deny all that devidence.
In addition there are numerous fossils about different stages of human evolution,
Hobu123 1 year ago
I don't care what you claim to be able to do in a lab.Logic insists an authentic specimen similar to piltdown man should exist.It does not.That is why piltdown was faked.Because that would hold up evolution.Why can we not find any REAL Piltdown men? There should be thousands of them.We have so many other fossils,why not the very one you need to prove your silly philosophy.You seem to have an explanation for the evidence BEFORE the evidence is discovered-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
I said - we have MANY transitional fossils about human evolution, so what is the point in your mindless repeating "there is none, there is none", like a broken parrot? Do you think that if you repeat that many times then those fossils cease to exist?
And I also explained you that there is no need for ANY fossils at all - evidence from genetics, biogeography, developmental biology ect alone are more than enough to reconstruct human evolution. Fossils is just an addition to all that.
Hobu123 1 year ago
Comment removed
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@Hobu123 One very big problem for evolution is the fact it cannot be observed.Scientific method says it must be observed to call it a fact-You say evidence can be found in other areas other than the fossil record and is enough to prove evolution-The observance problem could be eliminated if just one trans fossil of a human was found.Find a single tooth and reconstruct an entire being based on that one tooth.Then science even goes as far as to announce the sex of the "tooth"- Hahahahahashahahaha
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Nonsense. You keep repeating that nonsense like a broken parrot, while it has been repeatedly explained to you that evolution is DIRECTLY OBSERVABLE process and its studied on LIVING POPULATIONS. Those 20,000 articles per year would show you this but of course you never bother to read those.
Your posts reflect total ignorance about the most basic facts about science. Has it ever occurred to you that it really IS possible to tell the sex of tooth owner because of DNA?
Hobu123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We have numerous, numerous fossils about human evolution, just go and DO YOUR HOMEWORK and stop repeating the nonsense you have read from websites of religious propagandist liars.
If you want to see human fossils then GO TO YOUR LOCAL SCIENCE INSTITUTION that has department of paleontology. Or go to even some bigger museums. Or, with just few seconds you could find numerous PHOTOS about human fossils together with their analysis.
Hobu123 1 year ago
Where are they, you ask? ARE YOU BLIND or something? Nobody will be bringing them to your home, if you want to see them then MOVE YOURSELF and move it to somewhere else than just local church.
You say that you are qualified to discuss science? Sorry, but someone who says nonsensical stuff like "there is a theory called scientific method" is not qualified to discuss anything about science.
I have a scientific degree in biology, what do you have?
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 You are a lousy liar.You have no degree.You don't even understand my point on the theory of scientific method.How could you have the understanding required to achieve any kind of degree. Why do you seem so angry.Do intelligent people cause you to lose control of your emotions?I don't get afraid of folks pretending they are angry you silly goose.Just hang on.I will make some solid points-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Angry?
I LAUGH at the stupidity of religious fundies who think that they are in position of refuting all 21st century science, without even learning anything about the science. I laugh ta fundies who read some propaganda website of a pedopriest and then imagine that they have discovered information that overthrows all knows science :D
Yes, I HAVE a scientific degree, earned through hard work. Do the same and then talk.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 What you call evidence is nothing more than an interpretation. To say the theory of evolution is so strong that fossil evidence can be ignored is very foolish and unscientific-These interpretations are possibilities that biased and shallow minded people accept as fact.According to scientific method,they are not facts at all.The very thing that could produce a fact,you say is not needed.You are wrong.Evolution needs as much evidence as it can produce.Not what you THINK it means-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
What do YOU know about the evidence of evolution, considering the fact that you haven't bothered to read any of those 20,000 scientific articles that are published EVERY YEAR about it?
Do you even know what "scientific method" is?
Hobu123 1 year ago
It's becoming a popular statement in science to claim these fossils are not needed.The ONLY reason this is stated is because not one single fossil of this type exists-The study mentioned is the attempt to find a fossil-If that was ever discovered the entire science community would boast it proves evolution to be absolute-Until then they will say it has no bearing on the philosophy-Why can't we find just one skeleton fossil of a transitional human?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Evolution, being directly observable and testable process, observed in nature and in labs, does not need any fossils.
EVERY YEAR biologists publish around 20,000 (yes, TWENTY THOUSAND) peer reviewed scientific articles about their research and discoveries in evolutionary biology.
That you have not bothered to read even one of those articles is really not science's fault.
Hobu123 1 year ago
Also, if you fail to understand the most basic fact - that every fossil is transitional - then you are really not the one who should be discussing evolutionary biology.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 I don't fail to understand anything on this topic.And to say all fossils are transitions is not a fact.At best it is a biased interpretation because of the lack of real evidence-I am more qualified to discuss this topic than you seem to be-I seem to be more scientific than you.Maybe you shouldn't discuss biology.I don't call a thing a fact unless scientific method dictates it so- Show me a trans fossil of a human that is NOT a drawing-There should be millions.Where are they?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article.''
What you claimed is absurd. There are numerous examples of evolution observed both in labs and in nature. Why do you live in denialism? You could easily go and read about that research.
>>>>There is a theory called scientific method
What exactly is that supposed to mean? Are you crazy?
Hobu123 1 year ago
We have numerous, numerous fossils about human evolution, just go and DO YOUR HOMEWORK and stop repeating the nonsense you have read from websites of religious propagandist liars.
If you want to see human fossils then GO TO YOUR LOCAL SCIENCE INSTITUTION that has department of paleontology. Or go to even some bigger museums. Or, with just few seconds you could find numerous PHOTOS about human fossils together with their analysis.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 "Stone Age Discoveries of Shinich Fujimura"(exposed Nov.2000) -"Piltdown Chicken"(Oct.1999) -"The Sokl Hoax"(May1996) -"Margaret Mead and the Samoans"(1928) -"The Case of the Midwife Toad"(1926) - "Piltdown Man"(1912) -"Appletons Cyclopedia of American Biography"(exposed1919) -"The Taughannock Giant"(1879) -"The Calaveras Skull"(1866) -"The Charlton Brimstone Butterfly"- THESE ARE FAKE EVIDENCES PRODUCED BY SCIENCE.WHY ARE FAKES NEEDED IF YOU ARE CORRECT?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Typical religious propagandist.
Nobody NEEDS any fakes. Just like EVERYWHERE ELSE TOO, in every field of human activities, there occasionally appear people who fake stuff in science too.
However, all these frauds have been exposed by SCIENTISTS, many of them immediately.
Hobu123 1 year ago
"Piltdown chicken" was NOT fraud by scientists. It was put together by the Chinese fossil hunter who discovered it, and he assembled the the pieces were assembled to make the fossil more marketable to collectors, not to researchers. It happened to go to scientists' hands and after examining the fossil it soon became clear for scientists that it is not real.
However, the two fossils it was conctructed from are themselves both valuable transitional fossils.
Do some research about your claims.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 I have researched my claims completely.You are not my authority on this.Please stop asserting yourself as such-It doesn't matter who produced the evidence.Science should have known these were fake.Can science claim to know how the world and all living things came to be but cannot tell the difference between a pig tooth and a human tooth?An artist may have produced the fakes but science went along with the hoax or either science is not as capable as many people believe- Incompetent?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Nebraska man was not a hoax, it was a MISTAKE. Learn to know the difference between those two. Scientists can make mistakes.
However, look at the YEAR when "Nebraska man" was discovered. 1922! Don't you think that at those times long ago when there was no DNA analysis, no electronmicroskopes etc, it was hard to distinguish pig and human tooth because pig and human teeth ARE very similar.
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 There are some very honest evolution scientists that would expose fake evidence.But there are still too many that would fake evidence-Sure most of the time it is done for funding.Evolution is a subject of study that generates a lot of money-The people producing these fakes does not have a love of science.They love the money.Problem is more theories are built upon the evidence.Remember,the fakes are also considered evidence b4 they are exposed but other theories are formed and remain-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
Nonsensical conspiracy theory that has nothing to do with reality.
Do you really believe that millions of professional scientists from all around the world all participate in some massive fraud in order to earn money? You really are delusional.
There are 20,000 valid peer reviewed scientific articles published per year about evolution and you bring up couple of fakes from 19th century as "evidence" that science is conspiracy?
Hobu123 1 year ago
@Hobu123 "Many frauds are exposed immediately"... Unless we decide to teach them as legitimate evidence for 40 years in schools everywhere-I suspect sometime in the future, what you say is absolute evidence,will be said science doesn't need anymore to prove evolution-When we find out these interpretations are fake evidence well say it still doesn't even matter because of the theories built upon the fake evidence-It is much easier to fake an interpretation than a skeleton-
shotsxxx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hobu123 To suggest I have not read any science journals is ignorance on your part-A poodle from a wolf is the ONLY type of evolution observed in the lab-You cannot recreate and observe the evolution from ape to man-There is a theory called scientific method that I suspect you have no understanding of-An interpretation is NOT observance- We at least need just ONE fossil that is BONES and not a drawing based on an interpretation of a small fragment the size of a dime-We can't even find just one?
shotsxxx 1 year ago
@shotsxxx
You have read scientific articles. Good. Now tell me one of the articles that you have read. Title and journal, please. Make sure it is international peer reviewed scientific article.''
What you claimed is absurd. There are numerous examples