wow it must have took you very long to put this vid together... I did an animation which was only 120 frames : 40 fps : 4 seconds long and it actually took about 6:36 and I was sooo mad at the computer! wow u have some patience lol... btw how did you show your house from so near! i mapped my sphere with a 6.85 MB picture of the world but i still couldnt get it that near i also tried high bump but idk plz reply quick!!!!
Re-watching this series... Do you know if there's a title for that image at 0:17 ? It looks like Ganymede, but typing it in on Google doesn't yield the desired result and it isn't on the NASA APOD website...
Thank you so much for your videos. Whenever I am feelng a lot of stress I like to watch these clips to help reminde me there is some sanity in our universe.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Irrational practices such as Astrology" ?! Oh ya? Well new research published in Nature Neuroscience conducted at Vanderbilt University provides scientific support for the fundamental principle of astrology. In this study, not only did the birth month impact personality, it also resulted in measurable functional changes in the brains of mice. The study was carried out by Professor of Biological Sciences Douglas McMahon, graduate student Chris Ciarleglio, post-doctoral fellow Karen Gamble.
Luckily I was able to find the paper pretty quickly, and in no way is it connected with astrology. It references the seasons induced by the obliquity of the ecliptic and so called 'photoperiodic imprinting' at the perinatal stage of development in mice and humans. This has nothing to do with the positions of major planets, constellations or even months at all. Yet, on the other hand we have strong evidence that astrology appeals to the Forer effect. ???
Thanks for taking a look at the article I referenced and for replying to my post :)
I hadn't read the article itself but had read someone else's interpretation of it...this is not recommended, lol. I have since done my own research and must agree that the results of that study suggest only that the lighting effects of the Earth's relationship to the Sun cause the observed 'photoperiodic imprinting'. But daylight varies by hour, day, month, season...so all these are involved.
@mamajamal what forces are being translated from the stars to the growing baby? if sitting in a gravatron whilst your pregnant makes changes maybe its something closer to home like the moon or seasons.. sounds like the institutions have been infiltrated by scamers..
@mamajamal Ya mama and do you also believe in Yeti? Atlantis? Numerology? God? Bad luck from walking under ladders? Earth being settled by men from spaceships? Cretin.
Actually I don't 'believe' or 'disbelieve' anything to the point of not being willing to question and reassess my understanding based on new information and experience, which I remain open to considering at all times. Although I may have appeared to you to be a cretin, I am not one as far as I know...are you really a wanker?
@mamajamal They can't agree on how gravity works yet tell us that Astrology is BS because the stars couldn't have any effect on our lives from such a distance. Modern mainstream science is so corrupt and biased. HOW DARE THEY CRITICISE ANY OTHER BELIEF SYSTEM. Yes folks mainstream science is just another belief system.
@TonyBurke100 (sorry for replying to such an old post)
It's not that scientists CAN'T agree on how gravity works- it's that they HAVEN'T; science isn't a static set of tenets. Discoveries are made every day.
Scientists aren't stating that Astrology isn't correct, they are saying that it hasn't shown itself to be factual in the first place. It's up to Astrologists to prove Astrology, the scientists shouldn't have to lift a finger until you start making claims of evidence.
@mamajamal I am not going to give you a thumbs down. Basically because we Humans are clueless.. So Nothing surprises me anymore. BTW..In Western Astrology I was born under Sagittarius..In Chinese astrology I was born the year of the Monkey and I have blue eyes, which according to archaic Japanese thought means I have too much water in my being.. But that is a good thing... I guess.
i just wanted to say thank you for posting this kind of stuff about space. we all seem to go about our lives and forget that past those clouds is the real journey. so thank you, and post more if you can, i will watch.
AWESOME . I can't wait for the next episode . Thank you for this awesome video ! It's so sad that 95% of the population on Terra are religious people ... The religion is a so primitive thing . I don't know how u can believe that a supranatural guy just said something and *pam pam* " Universe established ! " . Bring us the next episode ^.^ .
The Universe amazes me because it shows just how insignificant we as a species are. For the first time in all of Human History we are able to look to the sky and see whats been happening around us for all of time. There is much more out there than the average citizen knows or even cares to think about. It's pretty sad actually.
We're born, live our lives and experience all these "emotions" and problems every human is to face, and die and all memory fades. Yet the Universe will continues on.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
how would you feel if you created the universe and the credit was given to someone else.... that is how God feels yet God still cares about you and wants you to draw close to him by reading his word the bible and following the example of his son Jesus Christ.
@AndromedasWake For sure! I think the entire Universe carries God's signature in some ways, but if I were God, I would kind of be satisfied that I created it. I would know whether I created it or not, so I would not be at the mercy of wanting humas to worship me! By the very fact their alive, I get glory for it. What would I care if they acknowledged me or not? Would I have not given them free will? How can they be free if I force them to worship me? XD
@SpiritualGurl1990 "The Bible" seems to be more about wanting people to act civilized and to love. The complaints are usually about murder, lying, violence, etc. How can you give anyone free will, if their will comes from yours in the first place? Same kind of question to big bangers. How do we have free will or minds like we do if we're just swirling masses of particles and energy that were set in motion forever ago?
@patrickblah I don't know about AndromedasWake but if I was that kind of being I would make there be ever more space and resources, and tweak the laws of gravity to allow bigger planets to occur to accommodate for this, and make it impossible for anyone to kill each other (but still keep pwnage prevalent of course). Remember, I would be omnipotent, omniscient, etc so I would be able to very easily do these things.
@LyriMetacurl The point of what I said had to do with the things you mentioned in your last sentence. If we're not omniscient, how do we know what we would do if we were? We know so little?
@patrickblah "How do we have free will or minds like we do if we're just swirling masses of particles and energy that were set in motion forever ago?" The answer is, because we have brains. With a brain as complex as ours, consciousness emerges. Consciousness is an emergent property and ceases to exist once the brain is destroyed. If you build a robot with human-like A.I., it'll also have free will. We came about through mechanical and biological processes over the eons, with minds to look back.
@VanKlaunch That's really not even an answer. You didn't even get what I was asking, I guess. Basically, we shouldn't even have "free will" because we've been predestined to be what we are and do what we'll do by whatever caused things to exist. Big banger, creationist, whatever, have no real answer to this that I know of.
@patrickblah What do you mean, predestined? We have free will, but to an extent. Some things we cannot control, though. Our universe happens to be the way it is because of what has occurred, not because it was pre-written. Now if you wish to talk about higher dimensions and parallel universes, then one can view free will as an illusion, but regardless our minds still make choices based on what they are. Creationists view the universe as a scroll written by God, now that's no free will.
@VanKlaunch Predestined, meaning that we're on a set course along with everything else that exists because we're supposedly made of all the same stuff and came from the same source. Inventing other "dimensions" and parrallel universes still doesn't change the logic in it because they would still affect eachother. Or, if they somehow don't effect eachother in any way then we won't even know about them and it's irrelevant. I don't know of any creationists who literally think it's a scroll..
@patrickblah You are misinterpreting predestination. Predestination has nothing to do with being made of the same stuff. It means that things are set to be a specific way throughout time and cannot be any other way no matter what. Being made of the same stuff means that there are certain limitations on what will happen in the future, but it in no way means that we would have to be a certain something at a certain point.
@EventHorizon373 When I said "stuff", I meant energy/forces too. Our wills would have been created for us by all the things that led up to our formation etc. We shouldn't have "free will" it seems, but we seem to have it. How does a big banger or anyone else reckon that we weren't set in motion long ago? If we're just the results of what happened in the past, what forces outside of the "stuff" could have changed our courses so they weren't predestined?
@patrickblah Again, you are misinterpreting the word predestined. Predestined means "to established or prearranged unalterably." You are saying that because we are here today, then the things that started us were predestined to create us. This is not what predestination is. It requires intent of some sort as well as necessitating events of the future. All the forces and "stuff" cannot necessitate me eating pancakes this morning, that is my own decision, my own free will.
@VanKlaunch Free will has nothing to do with control. Free will simply means being able to choose your next action. You make it seem like since we cannot choose to fly we do not have complete free will, and this is false. Free will simply means that your actions are not set. You can choose to do what you wish from moment to moment as opposed to having a plan for what you must do. Rather than "able" and "not able" with regards to future actions, think of it as "necessary" or "not necessary."
@RedDirtRubicon No, DNA is the signature of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. See? DNA. David Nigel Anderson. That's his real name.
In all seriousness, you're going to have to do better than just saying: "This molecule is God's signature". A signature is unquestionably clear and can be repeated upon request with witnesses.
@davidrstarr If they constituted a signature, we wouldn't use those three terms to describe them as reduced natural phenomena. DNA for example is a molecule which is naturally stable and composed of elements. A signature is a name, written down usually on a piece of paper. It's not a big ask, and it's not ambiguous.
@AndromedasWake If they constituted a signature, we wouldn't use those three terms to describe them as reduced natural phenomena. DNA for example is a molecule which is naturally stable and composed of elements. A signature is a name, written down usually on a piece of paper. It's not a big ask, and it's not ambiguous.
What I am trying to say is that the DNA sequence of an individual is their signature since it is unique. I t was in response to someone's post speaking of a DNA signature.
@davidrstarr Firstly, you posted it as a response to me, not someone else. Secondly, you're trying to conflate two meanings of signature. If DNA is my signature, than a creator's signature is its DNA. We can only speculate on what kind of being could create a real or simulated Universe, but if its identity is contingent on DNA, it is necessarily constrained by natural limits, and does not fit the description of a supernatural deity.
@davidrstarr Secondly, you're trying to conflate two meanings of signature.
Possibly. Maybe a better way to state it is that a person's handwritten name or DNA sequence can be used as a signature to uniquely identify that person.
@JNdigital TY. He's not the only one to have postulated such a hypothesis. Unfortunately it's bullshit, even before the realisation that natural processes can account for the origin of DNA and other SRMs.
@AndromedasWake I"m of the mindset where evolution or natural processes and development doesn't negate from divinity [spirit, not religious dogma]. Evolution and natural processes don't account for the origin of existence, not saying that means "god did it" rather that being and essence don't have a origin nor an ending and are thus infinite and eternal
@JNdigital Evolution doesn't attempt to account for the origin of existence, nor does physics try to explain such metaphysical questions, at least not yet. Physics has only recently taken serious steps towards a scientific ontology.
That aside though, the book you recommended is crummy. It's nothing to do with the reader's mindset, just a lack of plain old skepticism. Not to mention, as I said, there are accounts for the origin of DNA which are plausible and natural.
@AndromedasWake never mind, you judge without having even read it [nor watching the online youtube video], nor do u realize the author's career began as a successful computer scientist, who's bridging science and spirit.
I don't see what "signature" would be sufficient for you..
you said you wanted a signature and when I provided one for you, it's still not enough
it's good to have healthy skepticism not unhealthy cynicism; empowering faith or confidence is good not blinding biased "faith"
@JNdigital 1. The Author's career has no bearing on the strength of this hypothesis.
2. Bridging science and spirit has nothing to do with any of this.
3. His hypothesis is identical to others and raises no new evidence for design.
4. How about verses from the bible or some inspired prose engraved on the far side of the Moon? Or even the near side. Too much to ask from the creator of the Universe?
5. I'm no cynic. I just dislike propaganda and pseudoscience.
@AndromedasWake the 2nd part of #5 made sense, the others I don't find totally accurate [if u do that's your prerogative] and I don't know what you're talking about in #4 except that you mean it's an impossibility and all for naught [which contradicts your even asking for evidence or a signature or whatever]. I see my attempt to discuss and shed light was all for naught from the start.
@AndromedasWake the 2nd part of #5 makes sense one way or the other, the others I don't find totally accurate [if u do that's your prerogative] and I don't know what you're talking about in #4 except that you mean it's an impossibility and all for naught [which contradicts your even asking for evidence or a signature or whatever in the first place]. I realize ever more clearly my gesture to discuss or shed light was all for naught from the start.
@o4rudeboy , lol... reading his words? God wants to stone the witches?? damn.. I can't believe that a creator of a universe would have the morals of a stone age person.
Can you guys help me out? I've tried to google a question, but so far nothing. I don't know how to simplify it any more than it is. The question is, "How do scientists know how big stars are?".
They look at how bright it is and what temperature it is. (This is derived from it's color). A graph of Luminosity vs Temperature is called an H-R Diagram. Most stars are on a band called the Main Sequence. More massive stars are brighter and hotter than smaller ones. In Binary systems they measure the two stars gravitational effect on each other and figure out the mass that way. Keep in mind it's not an exact science. It's measured in solar masses. Give or take 10 solar masses is ALOT of mass.
It makes you pity the poor folks who live in universes that aren't suitable for life. Although I suppose that isn't as bad as not living in a universe that is suitable.
The universe is a wonderful place, no matter who or what you attribute it's coming into being to.
Please, be civil of those who have differing beliefs. I happen to be one of those who believe that "God dun it," but I don't need to go tell everyone else that and demean their beliefs in the process. If you think the God of the Bible is false, ok. No need to spout off about it when people are just trying to enjoy the majesty of the universe.
Sometimes when some ppl talk totally retarded things, it makes wanna beat them down. Maybe some ppl can't understand how simple many ppl are to believe fairy tales litteraly. And maybe they also wanna beat them down. Isnt it human to be uncivil towards those that think diferent?
we have stuff that says god didn't do and its just fine to talk about what you think and why as long as you don't use underhanded ways of trying to win people over
@StorminMormin91 Please, be civil of those who have differing beliefs. I happen to be one of those who believe that "God dun it," but I don't need to go tell everyone else that and demean their beliefs in the process. If you think the God of the Bible is false, ok. No need to spout off about it when people are just trying to enjoy the majesty of the universe.
Agreed. Insults, profanity and debasement should be banned from posters of public videos.
@davidrstarr How is this video uncivil? If you want to be insulted check out some of my other videos.
Also, if you think anything should be banned just because it's insulting (which technically anything could be to somebody) I really hope you never have any kind of actual power. Censorship is abhorrent, no matter how profane the original material is.
@AndromedasWake How is this video uncivil? If you want to be insulted check out some of my other videos.
I did not say the video itself was uncivil. Comments from the viewers of any video sometimes get very offensive and inflammatory. Your video is quite excellent.
Glory be Thy name oh lord of heaven and earth, thy name shall persist all through ages, in eternity and your son Jesus, have mercy on us, thy creatures
Since a small time i got interested by astronomy and i buyed a 130/650 newtonian telescope and i love it! Everybody shall look trough a telescope at least once in they're life. It's an amazing feeling knowing that the Earth it's just a thiny particle in the imensity of the universe! 5*
@WTFisJamieUp2 It's a moon around a gas giant, although not actually jupiter. It's set in another solar system, the nearest one to our own in fact. Unfortunately, they messed up the facts abit - there are probably no gas giants orbiting that particular star. But there might be some earth-like ones!
The Universe truely is a wonderous and mysterious thing. The forces governing it are so strange, as, at the very least, the smartest people i know, and myself included are baffled by them. the rules change when dealing with the exponential power of gravity and they change again in a world so small, gravity has no bearing. the universe spans an area as to be conceived by out feeble minds as infinite. I cannot wait to know more about our universe, even if i cannot understand it.
There is no reason for or cause to believe in this universe belonging to some higher power of whom has no tangibility in a very tangible universe. It is simply the universe, an area spanning about 40 billion light years consisting of energy, matter (created from energy), anti mater, dark matter, dark energy, and some of the most amazing natural phenomena conceivable. There is no man sitting in a throne ruling the galaxy, there is simply the universe, and what an amazing place it is.
33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine enly Begotten.
Considering we can observe planets forming from accretion discs (such as HD 100546 B), it has been observationally verified that there are no gods involved in planetary formation, only physics. Your bible has been proven wrong on a literal level.
Tehceilingkitteh: No need to be baffled by the unseen 'governing forces' that hold the Universes in place. Only an omnipotent, omniscient and allpowerful Creator, Almighty God could accomplish something this well organized and magnificent!. It is a worthy topic to delve into, yes. Keep on searching and gaining knowledge until you come to the Truth. : )
Sorry Yunginspirit, no matter how little we understand about our universe, i could never accept the idea that "magic man dun it" or that things happen "by magic" There is always a scientific answer awaiting discovery that will explain these things, and i can garrentee you that it will NOT be: "yup, its that god of the bible".
There is no magic man. God from the bibble and other gods may be not like they were described, but there is no smoke without fire. Also, the creator (srry to call it like that) is certainly not the guy from the bibble. Actually the creator could be proven scientifically. Unfortunately, we dont got neither the technology, neither the knowledge and even less the brain to proof it. Human legends are bounded to history, but cba to believe the universe doesnt got a purpose.
The images of flying through space at the beginning of this and other similar videos does move you (in a simulated fashion) at a speed greater than the speed of light, no? I think it's important to note that prominently, because people will otherwise come to expect that space travel CAN proceed at that speed, a la warp speed in star trek.
we can not understand god's plan so why bother let's concentrate on studying the bible which has everything we need and no mention of stars or black holes remember jesus walked on earth not mars
it's a typical catholoic stereotype that athiests have no morals. People with no religeous background could depend on their own instinctive moralities.
What your morals are could depend on your culture too.
Take for instance the Vikings, who had a religion that is only based on killing and pillaging.
Please, accept the different viewpoints of the world and beyond as we know it.
Please do not restrict your beliefs on a book thinner than the lord of the rings,
Thank you thank you thank you so much for this serie.
People like you (the authors) make me believe is still worth fighting for racional thought.
The edit is great, mind-blowing images accompanied by suberb and emocional music and a top notch narration with content being critical and presented in a simply way.
When I look at the stars and the galaxies and nebula formations, I think that your God is too small for such a magnificent vista of wonder and mystery.
4:14 - the quote isn't precise. I've translated first episode of the Cosmos into polish recently I I've noticed it immediately :) There shouldn't be "feeblest" and should be "great" before "height". But on the other side, it isn't important at all :D
why in every scientific video on youtube is some crap from Quaran or bible? your fairy tales has nothing to do with real world so leave them on your religious videos, not here
It was hit by a creationist votebot - a simultaneous attack of many one-star ratings to try and sink the ratings on scientific videos (or any video that does not promote literal six-day creation 6000 years ago). It was hit twice, in May and July. It would take about 5000 5-star ratings to bring it back to 5-stars. Oh well :]
You can technically take a picture of the big bang, go outside point the camera up and take a picture. The universe is still expanding today and all the big bang is is expansion of space/time; the big bang is still happening.
As for the electron a Swedish team not only took pictures of it but video.
I just noticed you're a pantheist or something, I thought you were a creationist making a terribly stupid challenge about showing evidence for the big bang or existence of electrons.
Anyway I don't understand what you mean by "actual bang", do you think there was a real "bang".. all the big bang is is space/time expanding from a singularity and to this day space/time is still expanding, the big bang never stopped, its still "bang"ing... I guess is the best way to put it...
Yeah i'm something, I dont think there was an actual "bang". What i mean to say is the "singularity" that has been puposed. Its ugly, i hate it, and if by some means there ever is a picture taken im sure it will be gross, and just because we are expanding, still only points to the idea that we were closer. A single point in space time though.....ughhh. And the work the sweeds did was very interesting, but not what i was "theoreticaly" asking for, still the best i'v gotten yet
wow it must have took you very long to put this vid together... I did an animation which was only 120 frames : 40 fps : 4 seconds long and it actually took about 6:36 and I was sooo mad at the computer! wow u have some patience lol... btw how did you show your house from so near! i mapped my sphere with a 6.85 MB picture of the world but i still couldnt get it that near i also tried high bump but idk plz reply quick!!!!
inventorwanted 6 months ago
Comment removed
213SEMPERFI 6 months ago
Re-watching this series... Do you know if there's a title for that image at 0:17 ? It looks like Ganymede, but typing it in on Google doesn't yield the desired result and it isn't on the NASA APOD website...
nashertheatheist 6 months ago
watching this always sparks my imagination. I hope there will be an addition to this series sometime in the future, reason why I am subscribed.
SuperNerd707 7 months ago
Such a beautiful series. I wish AndromedasWake would come back for more inspiring work.
Mospheric22 9 months ago
what a very very decent channel, thank you AndromedasWake....more scientists need to get out there and present in such an approachable manner.
milsimaustralia 9 months ago
Thank u too!
Oooooooooyeah 9 months ago
Capolavoro!
Oooooooooyeah 9 months ago
Thank you so much for your videos. Whenever I am feelng a lot of stress I like to watch these clips to help reminde me there is some sanity in our universe.
fourtrees44 11 months ago
358 God-zombies disliked this video.
Draeka 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Irrational practices such as Astrology" ?! Oh ya? Well new research published in Nature Neuroscience conducted at Vanderbilt University provides scientific support for the fundamental principle of astrology. In this study, not only did the birth month impact personality, it also resulted in measurable functional changes in the brains of mice. The study was carried out by Professor of Biological Sciences Douglas McMahon, graduate student Chris Ciarleglio, post-doctoral fellow Karen Gamble.
mamajamal 1 year ago
@mamajamal Thanks for prodiving a DOI!
Luckily I was able to find the paper pretty quickly, and in no way is it connected with astrology. It references the seasons induced by the obliquity of the ecliptic and so called 'photoperiodic imprinting' at the perinatal stage of development in mice and humans. This has nothing to do with the positions of major planets, constellations or even months at all. Yet, on the other hand we have strong evidence that astrology appeals to the Forer effect. ???
AndromedasWake 1 year ago 33
@AndromedasWake
Thanks for taking a look at the article I referenced and for replying to my post :)
I hadn't read the article itself but had read someone else's interpretation of it...this is not recommended, lol. I have since done my own research and must agree that the results of that study suggest only that the lighting effects of the Earth's relationship to the Sun cause the observed 'photoperiodic imprinting'. But daylight varies by hour, day, month, season...so all these are involved.
mamajamal 9 months ago
@mamajamal what forces are being translated from the stars to the growing baby? if sitting in a gravatron whilst your pregnant makes changes maybe its something closer to home like the moon or seasons.. sounds like the institutions have been infiltrated by scamers..
jarvis612 11 months ago
@mamajamal Ya mama and do you also believe in Yeti? Atlantis? Numerology? God? Bad luck from walking under ladders? Earth being settled by men from spaceships? Cretin.
wanker4761 11 months ago
@wanker4761
Actually I don't 'believe' or 'disbelieve' anything to the point of not being willing to question and reassess my understanding based on new information and experience, which I remain open to considering at all times. Although I may have appeared to you to be a cretin, I am not one as far as I know...are you really a wanker?
mamajamal 9 months ago
@mamajamal yes
wanker4761 9 months ago
@mamajamal They can't agree on how gravity works yet tell us that Astrology is BS because the stars couldn't have any effect on our lives from such a distance. Modern mainstream science is so corrupt and biased. HOW DARE THEY CRITICISE ANY OTHER BELIEF SYSTEM. Yes folks mainstream science is just another belief system.
TonyBurke100 3 months ago
@TonyBurke100 Finally!!! Some cockshite tries to disprove gravity. How's that working for ya? Fucking idiot.
MrLittletomdj 2 months ago
@TonyBurke100 (sorry for replying to such an old post)
It's not that scientists CAN'T agree on how gravity works- it's that they HAVEN'T; science isn't a static set of tenets. Discoveries are made every day.
Scientists aren't stating that Astrology isn't correct, they are saying that it hasn't shown itself to be factual in the first place. It's up to Astrologists to prove Astrology, the scientists shouldn't have to lift a finger until you start making claims of evidence.
AdHominus 1 month ago in playlist Welcome to the Universe
@mamajamal I am not going to give you a thumbs down. Basically because we Humans are clueless.. So Nothing surprises me anymore. BTW..In Western Astrology I was born under Sagittarius..In Chinese astrology I was born the year of the Monkey and I have blue eyes, which according to archaic Japanese thought means I have too much water in my being.. But that is a good thing... I guess.
karmakomodia 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
JNdigital 1 year ago
i just wanted to say thank you for posting this kind of stuff about space. we all seem to go about our lives and forget that past those clouds is the real journey. so thank you, and post more if you can, i will watch.
6868curtiss 1 year ago
AWESOME . I can't wait for the next episode . Thank you for this awesome video ! It's so sad that 95% of the population on Terra are religious people ... The religion is a so primitive thing . I don't know how u can believe that a supranatural guy just said something and *pam pam* " Universe established ! " . Bring us the next episode ^.^ .
sorry for bad english
elitebladesquad 1 year ago
@elitebladesquad "It's so sad that 95% of the population on Terra are religious people"
Watch the video beginning at 37 seconds. What do you see within the white circle?
davidrstarr 1 year ago
@davidrstarr brilliant . and ur saying that's god ? or what do you mean ? you quite amused me .
elitebladesquad 1 year ago
@elitebladesquad brilliant . and ur saying that's god ? or what do you mean ? you quite amused me .
I did not say anything. What do YOU see in the image at 37 seconds of the video?
davidrstarr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Best place to find women ***naneedj.info***
kalanediline 1 year ago
The Universe amazes me because it shows just how insignificant we as a species are. For the first time in all of Human History we are able to look to the sky and see whats been happening around us for all of time. There is much more out there than the average citizen knows or even cares to think about. It's pretty sad actually.
We're born, live our lives and experience all these "emotions" and problems every human is to face, and die and all memory fades. Yet the Universe will continues on.
TheFourthHouse 1 year ago
وَقُلِ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكُمْ فَمَن شَاء فَلْيُؤْمِن وَمَن شَاء فَلْيَكْفُرْ
0o40 1 year ago
Excellent series! Did you write the music yourself?
akpiano27 1 year ago
Fără cuvinte...imaginile vorbesc de la sine...
catalin1829 1 year ago
This series is brilliant, for people who like this I also recommend watching Cosmos... its a bit outdated but still is terrific.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
This is the one thing I would trade my life for. Even for just a glimpse, for even just a single second I'd give my life.
The fact that I will never even come close to ever being outside of our atmosphere is at times unbearable. Video nearly made me cry.
Ashitaka255 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how would you feel if you created the universe and the credit was given to someone else.... that is how God feels yet God still cares about you and wants you to draw close to him by reading his word the bible and following the example of his son Jesus Christ.
o4rudeboy 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy If I created the Universe I'd put my damn signature on it to avoid any confusion...
AndromedasWake 1 year ago 116
@AndromedasWake Owned XD (thumbs up)
NaruKification 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake For sure! I think the entire Universe carries God's signature in some ways, but if I were God, I would kind of be satisfied that I created it. I would know whether I created it or not, so I would not be at the mercy of wanting humas to worship me! By the very fact their alive, I get glory for it. What would I care if they acknowledged me or not? Would I have not given them free will? How can they be free if I force them to worship me? XD
SpiritualGurl1990 1 year ago
@SpiritualGurl1990 "The Bible" seems to be more about wanting people to act civilized and to love. The complaints are usually about murder, lying, violence, etc. How can you give anyone free will, if their will comes from yours in the first place? Same kind of question to big bangers. How do we have free will or minds like we do if we're just swirling masses of particles and energy that were set in motion forever ago?
patrickblah 1 year ago
@patrickblah I don't know about AndromedasWake but if I was that kind of being I would make there be ever more space and resources, and tweak the laws of gravity to allow bigger planets to occur to accommodate for this, and make it impossible for anyone to kill each other (but still keep pwnage prevalent of course). Remember, I would be omnipotent, omniscient, etc so I would be able to very easily do these things.
LyriMetacurl 1 year ago
@LyriMetacurl The point of what I said had to do with the things you mentioned in your last sentence. If we're not omniscient, how do we know what we would do if we were? We know so little?
patrickblah 1 year ago
@patrickblah "How do we have free will or minds like we do if we're just swirling masses of particles and energy that were set in motion forever ago?" The answer is, because we have brains. With a brain as complex as ours, consciousness emerges. Consciousness is an emergent property and ceases to exist once the brain is destroyed. If you build a robot with human-like A.I., it'll also have free will. We came about through mechanical and biological processes over the eons, with minds to look back.
VanKlaunch 1 year ago
@VanKlaunch That's really not even an answer. You didn't even get what I was asking, I guess. Basically, we shouldn't even have "free will" because we've been predestined to be what we are and do what we'll do by whatever caused things to exist. Big banger, creationist, whatever, have no real answer to this that I know of.
patrickblah 1 year ago
@patrickblah What do you mean, predestined? We have free will, but to an extent. Some things we cannot control, though. Our universe happens to be the way it is because of what has occurred, not because it was pre-written. Now if you wish to talk about higher dimensions and parallel universes, then one can view free will as an illusion, but regardless our minds still make choices based on what they are. Creationists view the universe as a scroll written by God, now that's no free will.
VanKlaunch 1 year ago
@VanKlaunch Predestined, meaning that we're on a set course along with everything else that exists because we're supposedly made of all the same stuff and came from the same source. Inventing other "dimensions" and parrallel universes still doesn't change the logic in it because they would still affect eachother. Or, if they somehow don't effect eachother in any way then we won't even know about them and it's irrelevant. I don't know of any creationists who literally think it's a scroll..
patrickblah 1 year ago
@patrickblah You are misinterpreting predestination. Predestination has nothing to do with being made of the same stuff. It means that things are set to be a specific way throughout time and cannot be any other way no matter what. Being made of the same stuff means that there are certain limitations on what will happen in the future, but it in no way means that we would have to be a certain something at a certain point.
EventHorizon373 1 year ago
@EventHorizon373 When I said "stuff", I meant energy/forces too. Our wills would have been created for us by all the things that led up to our formation etc. We shouldn't have "free will" it seems, but we seem to have it. How does a big banger or anyone else reckon that we weren't set in motion long ago? If we're just the results of what happened in the past, what forces outside of the "stuff" could have changed our courses so they weren't predestined?
patrickblah 1 year ago
@patrickblah Again, you are misinterpreting the word predestined. Predestined means "to established or prearranged unalterably." You are saying that because we are here today, then the things that started us were predestined to create us. This is not what predestination is. It requires intent of some sort as well as necessitating events of the future. All the forces and "stuff" cannot necessitate me eating pancakes this morning, that is my own decision, my own free will.
EventHorizon373 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EventHorizon373 Again, it looks like you don't even understand what I said.
patrickblah 1 year ago
@VanKlaunch Free will has nothing to do with control. Free will simply means being able to choose your next action. You make it seem like since we cannot choose to fly we do not have complete free will, and this is false. Free will simply means that your actions are not set. You can choose to do what you wish from moment to moment as opposed to having a plan for what you must do. Rather than "able" and "not able" with regards to future actions, think of it as "necessary" or "not necessary."
EventHorizon373 1 year ago
@EventHorizon373 I agree. I'm just bad at wording things logically when I'm on a lack of sleep.
VanKlaunch 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake How do you know what you'd do if you were that kind of being?
patrickblah 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake Ahahahah that's brilliant!
TheAnticipation16 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake and a 'This Way Up' sign?
wesmatron 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake God/Yahua did leave his signature... DNA.
RedDirtRubicon 1 year ago
@RedDirtRubicon No, DNA is the signature of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. See? DNA. David Nigel Anderson. That's his real name.
In all seriousness, you're going to have to do better than just saying: "This molecule is God's signature". A signature is unquestionably clear and can be repeated upon request with witnesses.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago 9
@AndromedasWake A signature is unquestionably clear and can be repeated upon request with witnesses.
It is called DNA sequencing, genotyping and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
davidrstarr 1 year ago
@davidrstarr If they constituted a signature, we wouldn't use those three terms to describe them as reduced natural phenomena. DNA for example is a molecule which is naturally stable and composed of elements. A signature is a name, written down usually on a piece of paper. It's not a big ask, and it's not ambiguous.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake If they constituted a signature, we wouldn't use those three terms to describe them as reduced natural phenomena. DNA for example is a molecule which is naturally stable and composed of elements. A signature is a name, written down usually on a piece of paper. It's not a big ask, and it's not ambiguous.
What I am trying to say is that the DNA sequence of an individual is their signature since it is unique. I t was in response to someone's post speaking of a DNA signature.
davidrstarr 1 year ago
@davidrstarr Firstly, you posted it as a response to me, not someone else. Secondly, you're trying to conflate two meanings of signature. If DNA is my signature, than a creator's signature is its DNA. We can only speculate on what kind of being could create a real or simulated Universe, but if its identity is contingent on DNA, it is necessarily constrained by natural limits, and does not fit the description of a supernatural deity.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
@davidrstarr Secondly, you're trying to conflate two meanings of signature.
Possibly. Maybe a better way to state it is that a person's handwritten name or DNA sequence can be used as a signature to uniquely identify that person.
davidrstarr 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake check out The God Code by Gregg Braden [book or video] about the signature of divinity being in the DNA code
watch?v=2ZSTSqXwymc
JNdigital 1 year ago
@JNdigital TY. He's not the only one to have postulated such a hypothesis. Unfortunately it's bullshit, even before the realisation that natural processes can account for the origin of DNA and other SRMs.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake I"m of the mindset where evolution or natural processes and development doesn't negate from divinity [spirit, not religious dogma]. Evolution and natural processes don't account for the origin of existence, not saying that means "god did it" rather that being and essence don't have a origin nor an ending and are thus infinite and eternal
JNdigital 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JNdigital I don't see what "signature" would or could be sufficient for you
JNdigital 1 year ago
@JNdigital Evolution doesn't attempt to account for the origin of existence, nor does physics try to explain such metaphysical questions, at least not yet. Physics has only recently taken serious steps towards a scientific ontology.
That aside though, the book you recommended is crummy. It's nothing to do with the reader's mindset, just a lack of plain old skepticism. Not to mention, as I said, there are accounts for the origin of DNA which are plausible and natural.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake never mind, you judge without having even read it [nor watching the online youtube video], nor do u realize the author's career began as a successful computer scientist, who's bridging science and spirit.
I don't see what "signature" would be sufficient for you..
you said you wanted a signature and when I provided one for you, it's still not enough
it's good to have healthy skepticism not unhealthy cynicism; empowering faith or confidence is good not blinding biased "faith"
JNdigital 1 year ago
@JNdigital 1. The Author's career has no bearing on the strength of this hypothesis.
2. Bridging science and spirit has nothing to do with any of this.
3. His hypothesis is identical to others and raises no new evidence for design.
4. How about verses from the bible or some inspired prose engraved on the far side of the Moon? Or even the near side. Too much to ask from the creator of the Universe?
5. I'm no cynic. I just dislike propaganda and pseudoscience.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
Comment removed
JNdigital 1 year ago
Comment removed
JNdigital 1 year ago
Comment removed
JNdigital 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AndromedasWake the 2nd part of #5 made sense, the others I don't find totally accurate [if u do that's your prerogative] and I don't know what you're talking about in #4 except that you mean it's an impossibility and all for naught [which contradicts your even asking for evidence or a signature or whatever]. I see my attempt to discuss and shed light was all for naught from the start.
JNdigital 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake the 2nd part of #5 makes sense one way or the other, the others I don't find totally accurate [if u do that's your prerogative] and I don't know what you're talking about in #4 except that you mean it's an impossibility and all for naught [which contradicts your even asking for evidence or a signature or whatever in the first place]. I realize ever more clearly my gesture to discuss or shed light was all for naught from the start.
JNdigital 1 year ago
Comment removed
JNdigital 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake
Gosh.
Have you seen the Christmas votebot attacks?
minborox 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy , lol... reading his words? God wants to stone the witches?? damn.. I can't believe that a creator of a universe would have the morals of a stone age person.
gskowal 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy Man god is emotionally confused... he loves us, but wants us to go to hell for doing things based on instinct.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy LOL, epic fail at life.
DragonCuber 1 year ago 2
@o4rudeboy
"how would you feel if you created the universe and the credit was given to someone else"
I'd feel like an idiot for not making it clearer that I did it.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy ummm.w00t?God is not human therefor has no feeling like that !
LOL thats how god feels he sais w00t!
CrownChanel 1 year ago
@o4rudeboy How do you know what god feels? are you omniscient? how would anyone know what god feels if he existed? How? The bible? That's laughable.
chilleffect 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@o4rudeboy If I created the Universe I'd put my damn signature on it to avoid any confusion...
Look at the video starting at 37 seconds and stop it. What do you see?
davidrstarr 1 year ago
I am gonna put this on my facebook
reecer11 1 year ago
Lovely video. What is the music? I would love to play it.
ssmith73 1 year ago
Faved for the statement around 3:50.
ericleb01 1 year ago
Where is the song you used for the first Welcome to the Universe video? I had that song in my head for months!
alvcardvx 1 year ago
Beatiful and awe inspiring.
Bobajobimus 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
music is a bit crappy. for the rest, the picture is fine
XBionic1955 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can you guys help me out? I've tried to google a question, but so far nothing. I don't know how to simplify it any more than it is. The question is, "How do scientists know how big stars are?".
sentenal01 2 years ago
They look at how bright it is and what temperature it is. (This is derived from it's color). A graph of Luminosity vs Temperature is called an H-R Diagram. Most stars are on a band called the Main Sequence. More massive stars are brighter and hotter than smaller ones. In Binary systems they measure the two stars gravitational effect on each other and figure out the mass that way. Keep in mind it's not an exact science. It's measured in solar masses. Give or take 10 solar masses is ALOT of mass.
Tatchko 1 year ago 2
It makes you pity the poor folks who live in universes that aren't suitable for life. Although I suppose that isn't as bad as not living in a universe that is suitable.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
the music has a very cosmos feel to it. But, that music was some of the most beautiful Ive ever heard, so its only fitting.
Lallapalalable 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why do all these videos have a guy with a lame ass english accent speaking?
Its irritating.
maybe if they didnt make all these video sound like they are being narrated by pretentious pricks they would be a little more popular?
Make the next video in ebonics :)
gifoi 2 years ago
who is "they"? the atheists?
freakin xenophobe
agoule01 2 years ago
@agoule01
Are you a retard?
do you even know what a xenophobe IS?
gifoi 2 years ago
Comment removed
agoule01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah, idiot. who's the one insulting the dude for his "lame-ass english accent"?
agoule01 2 years ago
@gifoi, Yeah. It's a dude who is afraid of xylophones.
ananiasacts 2 years ago
I'm a Brit, and I agree. Lets get a Kasakstani or an Inuit to narrate the next one. Then we can all understand it.
grengd 2 years ago
@grengd
Finally, somebody understands. :/
gifoi 2 years ago
The universe is a wonderful place, no matter who or what you attribute it's coming into being to.
Please, be civil of those who have differing beliefs. I happen to be one of those who believe that "God dun it," but I don't need to go tell everyone else that and demean their beliefs in the process. If you think the God of the Bible is false, ok. No need to spout off about it when people are just trying to enjoy the majesty of the universe.
StorminMormin91 2 years ago
Sometimes when some ppl talk totally retarded things, it makes wanna beat them down. Maybe some ppl can't understand how simple many ppl are to believe fairy tales litteraly. And maybe they also wanna beat them down. Isnt it human to be uncivil towards those that think diferent?
GDZjeenik 2 years ago
we have stuff that says god didn't do and its just fine to talk about what you think and why as long as you don't use underhanded ways of trying to win people over
kokofan50 2 years ago
@StorminMormin91 Please, be civil of those who have differing beliefs. I happen to be one of those who believe that "God dun it," but I don't need to go tell everyone else that and demean their beliefs in the process. If you think the God of the Bible is false, ok. No need to spout off about it when people are just trying to enjoy the majesty of the universe.
Agreed. Insults, profanity and debasement should be banned from posters of public videos.
davidrstarr 1 year ago
@davidrstarr How is this video uncivil? If you want to be insulted check out some of my other videos.
Also, if you think anything should be banned just because it's insulting (which technically anything could be to somebody) I really hope you never have any kind of actual power. Censorship is abhorrent, no matter how profane the original material is.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago
@AndromedasWake How is this video uncivil? If you want to be insulted check out some of my other videos.
I did not say the video itself was uncivil. Comments from the viewers of any video sometimes get very offensive and inflammatory. Your video is quite excellent.
davidrstarr 1 year ago
Glory be Thy name oh lord of heaven and earth, thy name shall persist all through ages, in eternity and your son Jesus, have mercy on us, thy creatures
homer30 2 years ago
@homer30 ,
Sorry, don't agree at all, nor would Carl Sagan.
1BustedMyth 2 years ago
where are all these amazing pictures of the universe coming from? nasa?
Xinadium 2 years ago 3
Since a small time i got interested by astronomy and i buyed a 130/650 newtonian telescope and i love it! Everybody shall look trough a telescope at least once in they're life. It's an amazing feeling knowing that the Earth it's just a thiny particle in the imensity of the universe! 5*
"sorry for the grammatical mistakes"
nickshor 2 years ago 2
this is just a random side note but if anyone's seen avatar the movie i saw the planet there on is a moon of jupiter
WTFisJamieUp2 2 years ago
@WTFisJamieUp2 It's a moon around a gas giant, although not actually jupiter. It's set in another solar system, the nearest one to our own in fact. Unfortunately, they messed up the facts abit - there are probably no gas giants orbiting that particular star. But there might be some earth-like ones!
AndromedasWake 2 years ago 8
ok thank you for that its a bit weird though that it has the red spot and all
WTFisJamieUp2 2 years ago
@AndromedasWake there is a moon of Saturn called Pandora (way before the Avatar movie came out, too). It's just a small icy asteroid moon though.
LyriMetacurl 1 year ago
im 13 and I think the universe is amazing nebulas, cosmos, galaxies i mean its fascinating!
THEomarSHHHOW 2 years ago 32
@THEomarSHHHOW very agree!
stefanoargenys 1 year ago
The Universe truely is a wonderous and mysterious thing. The forces governing it are so strange, as, at the very least, the smartest people i know, and myself included are baffled by them. the rules change when dealing with the exponential power of gravity and they change again in a world so small, gravity has no bearing. the universe spans an area as to be conceived by out feeble minds as infinite. I cannot wait to know more about our universe, even if i cannot understand it.
Tehceilingkitteh 2 years ago
There is no end to God's dominion...worlds without end!
: )
Yunginspirit 2 years ago
There is no reason for or cause to believe in this universe belonging to some higher power of whom has no tangibility in a very tangible universe. It is simply the universe, an area spanning about 40 billion light years consisting of energy, matter (created from energy), anti mater, dark matter, dark energy, and some of the most amazing natural phenomena conceivable. There is no man sitting in a throne ruling the galaxy, there is simply the universe, and what an amazing place it is.
Tehceilingkitteh 2 years ago
33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine enly Begotten.
Moses 1: 8, 33
Yunginspirit 2 years ago
Considering we can observe planets forming from accretion discs (such as HD 100546 B), it has been observationally verified that there are no gods involved in planetary formation, only physics. Your bible has been proven wrong on a literal level.
doogtoog 2 years ago
Amen to that! :)
Sp nice to see them making these vids and raising people consciousness and getting them interested in this stuff. The future depends on them.
MattHunX 2 years ago
Tehceilingkitteh: No need to be baffled by the unseen 'governing forces' that hold the Universes in place. Only an omnipotent, omniscient and allpowerful Creator, Almighty God could accomplish something this well organized and magnificent!. It is a worthy topic to delve into, yes. Keep on searching and gaining knowledge until you come to the Truth. : )
Yunginspirit 2 years ago
Sorry Yunginspirit, no matter how little we understand about our universe, i could never accept the idea that "magic man dun it" or that things happen "by magic" There is always a scientific answer awaiting discovery that will explain these things, and i can garrentee you that it will NOT be: "yup, its that god of the bible".
Tehceilingkitteh 2 years ago
There is no magic man. God from the bibble and other gods may be not like they were described, but there is no smoke without fire. Also, the creator (srry to call it like that) is certainly not the guy from the bibble. Actually the creator could be proven scientifically. Unfortunately, we dont got neither the technology, neither the knowledge and even less the brain to proof it. Human legends are bounded to history, but cba to believe the universe doesnt got a purpose.
GDZjeenik 2 years ago
Comment removed
ScaredCrows 2 years ago
still waiting for the 4th welcome to the universe series
SuperNerd707 2 years ago
i hate all the nations of the world
pepogomesmendes 2 years ago
OMG its Jebus! 0:37
chodaboy51500 2 years ago
The images of flying through space at the beginning of this and other similar videos does move you (in a simulated fashion) at a speed greater than the speed of light, no? I think it's important to note that prominently, because people will otherwise come to expect that space travel CAN proceed at that speed, a la warp speed in star trek.
SteveWeinberg 2 years ago
Thank you sir for bringing enlightenment to our little corner of the universe that we call Terra.
Your efforts are much appreciated by smart pple and hopefully they will be heard by the ones with open minds.
Keep up the good work.
I will surely donate to your educational cause.
mancamiatipoola 2 years ago 4
eh dude, tell me when the next one is coming out. it's been 8 months.
minborox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we can not understand god's plan so why bother let's concentrate on studying the bible which has everything we need and no mention of stars or black holes remember jesus walked on earth not mars
j4pan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I would kill you if i see you
foxxravin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yes you're probably atheist and therefore have no morals well luckily for me i don't go anywhere near atheists so i don't have to hear their "facts"
j4pan 2 years ago
Thats why your so stupid
foxxravin 2 years ago
Yeah, 'facts' can be so damn inconvenient when you already know everything.
Why not start a movement that kills everyone who disagrees with you, or better still, just ignore 'evil science', no one is forcing you to look.
FreindlyRanger 2 years ago 5
it's a typical catholoic stereotype that athiests have no morals. People with no religeous background could depend on their own instinctive moralities.
What your morals are could depend on your culture too.
Take for instance the Vikings, who had a religion that is only based on killing and pillaging.
Please, accept the different viewpoints of the world and beyond as we know it.
Please do not restrict your beliefs on a book thinner than the lord of the rings,
Please, open your eyes.
minborox 2 years ago 14
The Vikings were the Klingons of the Middle Ages.
MegaVolcano 2 years ago
word!
TheProdigy87 2 years ago
Klingons, HAH!
meet the ORKS form Warhammer 40k!
minborox 2 years ago
yeah except they actually existed. so it's more like Klingons are the vikings of startrek.
Keinlicht 2 years ago
We cannot understand God's plan, so why bother studying the bible.
FreindlyRanger 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And why would you say that?
Why would you take something from people who are the WORST representatives of a religion and use it to generalize the belief?
The moron who said that is a Christian as much as Stalin is an ethical and moral statesman.
usaforlife 2 years ago
Which one? I'm not sure which of my comments have offended you so. I was replying to other comments in the same manner as they were written.
FreindlyRanger 2 years ago
Wow! Looks like a great series.
Thank you, for sharing.
Have a great day.
Lisa from Munich
Sundrumify 2 years ago
Thank you thank you thank you so much for this serie.
People like you (the authors) make me believe is still worth fighting for racional thought.
The edit is great, mind-blowing images accompanied by suberb and emocional music and a top notch narration with content being critical and presented in a simply way.
Kudos ^^
Zortyum 2 years ago
fucking american fuckers
MStaceyface 2 years ago
Your a charmer arnt you
likegrace 2 years ago
Exeter truly is the best place on Earth, and in the Universe.
WillSKB88 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When i look at the dark sky, the distant stars, i think of a greatest artist, I think of God
In the beginning
homer30 2 years ago
FAIL
julianochoa1 2 years ago 3
When I look at the stars and the galaxies and nebula formations, I think that your God is too small for such a magnificent vista of wonder and mystery.
FSAthe1st 2 years ago 5
4:14 - the quote isn't precise. I've translated first episode of the Cosmos into polish recently I I've noticed it immediately :) There shouldn't be "feeblest" and should be "great" before "height". But on the other side, it isn't important at all :D
Kyromation 2 years ago
No no no. Believers don't want to be humble before the universe. (Besides, they don't understand it)
It's only the thingy from the bible. The invisible nonexistant 'god' they want to be humble in front.
BelieveNoGod 2 years ago 4
Why does all the planets and moons look spherical ?
That's wrong !!! The Earth is FLAT. So says the koran, and the bible. :)))
BelieveNoGod 2 years ago 2
At 0:50, where exactly is that? I'm American, so it's natural I'm not familiar with anything outside my country. USA! USA! USA! haha.
GuppyPal 2 years ago
It looks like somewhere near Exeter in England.
spenceII 2 years ago
Thanks. Obviously I knew it was England, but most Americans haven't heard of many English towns/cities.
GuppyPal 2 years ago
i was wondering
crazyseb13 2 years ago
why in every scientific video on youtube is some crap from Quaran or bible? your fairy tales has nothing to do with real world so leave them on your religious videos, not here
Shifticek 2 years ago 7
Let's go to my writing invented
WAWE ONDES?? w
WHAT ONDES??
for discovery visit my videos
Akoveable 2 years ago
The fact that this video does not have a five star rating attests to the stupidity of humanity.
Opiedid 2 years ago 6
It was hit by a creationist votebot - a simultaneous attack of many one-star ratings to try and sink the ratings on scientific videos (or any video that does not promote literal six-day creation 6000 years ago). It was hit twice, in May and July. It would take about 5000 5-star ratings to bring it back to 5-stars. Oh well :]
AndromedasWake 2 years ago
Let's start working on it then >.>
Your videos are very professional and deserve it
OverusedChewToy 2 years ago 2
WHY THE HELL DOESN'T YOUTUBE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS?
I'm tried of having creationist act like they own YouTube, as if they can do anything they like here.
Their irrational, subversive behavior should be swiftly punished by YouTube (if that company has any control over this site at all...)
FUCK YOUTUBE, grow some balls; ban douchebag creationist that use votebots.
FreedomLiberty21 2 years ago 6
@Opiedid
Seems as if it attests to both the stupidity and ingenuity of humanity; those creationist and their crafty votebots.
lokomeng 1 year ago
Comment removed
Cyor77 2 years ago
@Cyor77
You can technically take a picture of the big bang, go outside point the camera up and take a picture. The universe is still expanding today and all the big bang is is expansion of space/time; the big bang is still happening.
As for the electron a Swedish team not only took pictures of it but video.
randomlylostperson 2 years ago
i posted a response to you on your channel, i am talking of the actual Bang, not its outcome which ( theoreticaly is our night sky)
Cyor77 2 years ago
I just noticed you're a pantheist or something, I thought you were a creationist making a terribly stupid challenge about showing evidence for the big bang or existence of electrons.
Anyway I don't understand what you mean by "actual bang", do you think there was a real "bang".. all the big bang is is space/time expanding from a singularity and to this day space/time is still expanding, the big bang never stopped, its still "bang"ing... I guess is the best way to put it...
randomlylostperson 2 years ago
Yeah i'm something, I dont think there was an actual "bang". What i mean to say is the "singularity" that has been puposed. Its ugly, i hate it, and if by some means there ever is a picture taken im sure it will be gross, and just because we are expanding, still only points to the idea that we were closer. A single point in space time though.....ughhh. And the work the sweeds did was very interesting, but not what i was "theoreticaly" asking for, still the best i'v gotten yet
Cyor77 2 years ago
"Its ugly, i hate it"
Why? (do you accept the current big bang theory)
randomlylostperson 2 years ago