Finally! A concert pianist who shows emotion, one who exhibits passion, not just mechanical technique, but one who expresses genuine emotion which exudes from the soul to his fingers. How many times have I listened to so-called modern day composers and their compositions which seem to go nowhere, it is as if the composer is lost, mesmerized by his own creation stuck in infinite arpeggios, not knowing when, where, or how to get off!
Not this man, he leads the listener into blissful completeness
@Ungoliant101 Hamelin has never recorded this one on CD unfortunately, but there are several live recordings, some of which are in very good sound quality. I've uploaded one of these, check it out: /watch?v=xPGfbQHGXdo Hamelin is such a master.
i think about Bach.. he was touched by god himself when he conceived this.. this piece is full of grace and disgrace, death plays with his long and thin fingers while life echoes in the highest notes. and more, nostalgia regrets, sweetness and serenity ! all togheter implemented in a single sound, in a single word, that speaks about everything you can ever imagine, just with one movement.
if i could ever imagine a sound like this, that would drive me out of mind..
Hamelin has a lot of power but as an interpretation, Alicia reigns supreme. I'll never forget the impact of hearing her play it live in a a recital that also included a stunning performance of the Ravel Gaspard,,,
you cannot possibly think that this sounds better than the (original, i might add) version of the chaconne for violin. even the first chord sounds so much worse.
One is for the piano, one is for the violin. This takes on a totally new temperament and is a product of a totally different aesthetic. Trying to compare them is better.
Especially when you use such subjective 'measures' as what 'sounds better'. Some people play the piano.
The "original" can't be played on the modern violin with its bow that can only play two strings at a time. Hence all the chords that are rolled on the violin version.
That being said, about the only thing the piano version has in common with the violin version is the melody and chords. Since it is a virtuoso arrangement, the piano version sounds a lot heavier.
@oracle2world I would say the piano version is a lot more limited than the violin version. Bach clearly never intended the piece to be played on a clavi.
de très loin la meilleure version que je connaisse! une petite parenthèse d'intimité, hors du monde, où tout est sincère, j'admire infiniment ce que Monsieur Hamelin transmet ici, ce petit moment magique et en même temps d'un désespoir profond! Mille merci d'avoir posté cette vidéo
non, je ne néglige rien, mais je vais là où je suis ému et touché! et aussi "historiques" soient elles, les autres versions me touchent moins, c'est subjectif et très personnel, libre à chacun d'aimer plus une version que d'autres!
More than mechanical capability is required to sustain my interest. It has a lot to do with what's between the ears. He knows how to put it together and bring out his heart felt expression. That is when it becomes superfluous. I enjoyed this very much.
i don't believe in the who's better nonsense, at least not when you get to that level, they are different and each very accomplished and respected in their own way. i heard hamelin play live at ikif festival during the summer and it was surreal.
I agree. It's like trying to decide among vintage wines.
The "he/she's better than...." type of argument reminds me of the Gould recording of the Prokofiev Sonata and Scriabin works shortly after Horowitz's legendary recordings of the same works. In part, Gould wanted to "one up" the master; he was Gould's rival (in his mind, I think) at any rate, the critics were split. Bottom line: both are fantastic recordings viewed from two very different perspectives..both high art..both vintage wine.
actually, i agree with you 100% on that cuz i major for the piano in college and i play basketball as well and piano needs some form of conditioning like basketball (although Basketball obviously needs much much more since it's a sport)
Yes I really like Grimaud's performance of this work. As a woman I can say that this is a very difficult work to play if you haven't got huge hands so Grimaud does an amazing job.
Caro Golberg lei ha ragione,credo. M Tipo stacca tempo più lento in parecchi punti. Michelangelli ne dà una versione febbrile e angosciata. Questo Hamelin è un vero fuoriclasse !!!! o no? Un saluto
A much simpler transcription, truer to the actual music by Bach, is the Brahms transcription for piano left hand (one can actually play it using both hands). You don't have to add notes to an already sublime piece to "make it better".
This is an excelent performance!! Like everything Hamelin plays. When Busoni wrote this transcription he wasn't thinking about the original piece for the violin! He was probably trying to make the piano sound like a church organ or an orquestra!! This piece is more a Busoni piece then a Bach piece. A person saying that it should sound "like a violin piece" obviously doesn't know this transcrition well!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What a sad performace. This is by far the worst I´ve ever heard a pianist perform Bachs chaconne. He plays as if it was written for piano.He should listen to a violonist perform it and learn something about Bachs violin music!
That's because this transcription WAS written for piano. Busoni was a master pianist; Hamelin is playing his *transcription* of Bach's chaconne.
Hamelin is a very intelligent man; he is likely very aware that this piece was originally for violin, and has probably heard it a thousand times. Again, though: this is not a transcription in the style of solo violin, so what binds Hamelin to playing it as such?
(Also to farsta1): Furthermore, how does one play a piano in a violin-like manner? Sure, you might be able to turn some phrasing tricks, or roll chords in a certain way, but a piano is going to sound like a piano, whether you like it or not.
The same can be said of performing harpsichord works on piano. You're going to sound like a pianist, no matter how much you try to convince yourself that you sound like a harpsichordist. The two instruments are different. Get over it.
Interesting. What if the violinist tried to perform the piano transcription on the violin. What would we learn then, fartsa...oops pardon me...farsta?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I agree with you. The piano must vibrate like can a violin or human voice, specially in this thema of the beginning, veru intense. at least, give the illusion of that. Well in this performance, the chords are played like a percission as a piano. He's very intelligent but the intelligence without heart is a little boring.
This transcription is supposed to sound like an organ, not a violin. Well, like a piano that sounds like an organ. Anyway, it's not meant to sound like the original form.
One of the best (and most musical) performances I've heard of this work is by Alicia de Larrocha and can be found on one of her Mostly Mozart recordings.
I have listened to Michelangeli's version once. I was not too impressed. I have played this piece, and I think Kissin's is the best. However after hearing Hamelin's version I think technically it is just as good as Kissin's. Though I think Kissin has the driven interpretation to carry it to peoples hearts.
I like this performance very much. Hamelin is a wonderful pianist. Thank god we have youtube, hehe. This pieces seems incredibly easy for him. Of course, his big hands help a lot with the many large streches this piece demands of the pianists.
There's a video of Michelangeli playing small parts of this piece in the beginning of the video of him playing the Ravel Concerte in G, with Celibidache.
Unfortunately there is no video of the Michelangeli, just the recording on cd. Incidentally there is another great recording, not as good as Michelangeli, but very good nevertheless, by Jorge Bolet.
Majestic! Bach if the Mt. Everst of Baroque music. There is clear and delicate individuation of the voices. Hamelin has tried to penetrate the core mystery of Bach's music. Almost but not quite. Bach and metaphysics are siblings. Both go down deep into the freshness of Be-ing!
the michelangeli recording is the standard by which all others are judged. it was recorded in the 50's and when i heard it my jaw literally dropped. his color palette is astounding. no other recording even comes close. its on a CD that has the Brahms-Pagannini variations also. again the greatest performance ever. i urge you people to buy it. i will give you your money back if it doesnt blow your mind
I agree with you BrianCIM. But if you get a chance to hear Jack Gibbons, who plays regularly in the USA (he's British) you should also hear his Bach Chaconne which was unbelievable when I heard him NYC in c.2003. The NYC concert was filmed and I'm still trying to get hold of a tape of it!
if you do get a tape notify me. gibbons is a wonderful pianist and i have been playing alkan's music since i was 17. his recording of the concerto for solo piano is amazing. not as dry as hamelin's. i still love those old ronald smith recordings too.
@twooffour have you watched the latest performance on YT. I think it is the greatest overall recording of that piece with Ronald Smith coming in as a close second. They just reposted the video. i will send it.
I'd like to take back the "uncertain" part - Hamelin does look and sound significantly more relaxed than Gibbons, but he does fuck up at some of the difficult leap passages in the 1st stages, and certainly makes smaller mistakes, too.
But his performance (both live and studio) is incomparable more fluent, interesting and exciting than Gibbons'.
@brianCIM I think they are very different approaches. I have always felt Gibbons performance highlights the orchestral aspects of this amazing work better than Hamelin. Hamelin's i would say is more "pianistic" to use a generic word. it just doesn't feel as EPIC as Smith's or Gibbons and he rushes the hell out of the last movement glossing over some really amazing moments. You should know these are only SLIGHT criticisms, as MAH is a titanic pianist whom i admire tremendously.
@brianCIM To me the highlight of MAH's Alkan discography is his rendition of the Sonata which has no equal, even eclipsing Ronald Smith's wonderful recording. In particular i think his Quasi-Faust will never be bettered. He comes out of himself there and it is truly demonic with a handling of the 8-voice fugue that is simply beyond imagination. He also produces a sound that in its hugeness, for lack of a better word, has rarely been equaled in the history of pianism.
In 1997 a girl called lauren was walikng in a forest and then a she just dissapeared no one ever found her untill 2000 when a yoing girl called Mary found her body and markings on her chest saying: I wasnt pretty enough" and now you have read this she will appear in your mirror saying your not pretty enough and kill you. by the way the girl called mary died shortly after.
To be saved paste this to 5 other videos. THIS TRUE.
There's an amazing early tv film of Michelangeli playing the Bach Busoni Chaconne but it's hard to find. The best performance I ever heard of this piece was by Jack Gibbons in New York a few years ago. I'm told Gibbons video tapes all his performances but won't release the tapes!
An extract from the video of Michalengeli playing the Bach Busoni Chaconne was shown on British tv (BBC, I think, or possibly Channel 4?) when they screened Michelageli's video performance of Debussy's Preludes Book 1 back in the 1980s. It was a studio recording of the Bach Busoni and my guess is it was made for Italian tv in the 50s or 60s. I keep hoping it will be released or show up on YouTube.
hey just thought you should know about Michelangeli's recording (think he actually did 2) but i was in the train station in Stuttgart, Germany, and came across a load of REALLY cheap triple disk collections, the label is 'Worten Classico'. Michelangeli's contained the Chaconne. It is one of my favourite recordings that i own -and i have thousands, including 8 of this piece. It's a performance that stays with you. Enjoy! p.s. really enjoyed this recording too.
Not to mislead, I've listened to Mr. Hamelin's compositions and they are absolutely sublime.
SoloFlyer55 4 months ago
Finally! A concert pianist who shows emotion, one who exhibits passion, not just mechanical technique, but one who expresses genuine emotion which exudes from the soul to his fingers. How many times have I listened to so-called modern day composers and their compositions which seem to go nowhere, it is as if the composer is lost, mesmerized by his own creation stuck in infinite arpeggios, not knowing when, where, or how to get off!
Not this man, he leads the listener into blissful completeness
SoloFlyer55 4 months ago 2
does anyone know if there are audio recordings available of this?
Ungoliant101 8 months ago 2
Comment removed
e4e5sf3sf6 6 months ago
Comment removed
e4e5sf3sf6 6 months ago
Comment removed
madlovba3 3 months ago
@Ungoliant101 Hamelin has never recorded this one on CD unfortunately, but there are several live recordings, some of which are in very good sound quality. I've uploaded one of these, check it out: /watch?v=xPGfbQHGXdo Hamelin is such a master.
madlovba3 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think about Bach.. he was touched by god himself when he conceived this.. this piece is full of grace and disgrace, death plays with his long and thin fingers while life echoes in the highest notes. and more, nostalgia regrets, sweetness and serenity ! all togheter implemented in a single sound, in a single word, that speaks about everything you can ever imagine, just with one movement.
if i could ever imagine a sound like this, that would drive me out of mind..
MrLocalitaItalia 8 months ago 2
Comment removed
MrLocalitaItalia 8 months ago 2
mix up bach's barrocan brillance and busoni's virtuosity and you get something divine
lcxdfgsbldfgbadfnvaa 9 months ago
Hamelin riesce adare al pianoforte le risonanze dell' organo.
MegaUlzana 9 months ago
It is true what Oliver Sachs writes in his book 'music and the brain': A musicion in full action is a functional miracle.
tasteism 10 months ago 2
He's talking to all of us. Through. This. Piece.
777mrpiano777 11 months ago
BEST PIANIST EVER!!!! Genius all over!!!
patricioapaez 1 year ago
Hamelin has a lot of power but as an interpretation, Alicia reigns supreme. I'll never forget the impact of hearing her play it live in a a recital that also included a stunning performance of the Ravel Gaspard,,,
Malcolm64 1 year ago
Comment removed
madlovba2 1 year ago
a great pianist ,performance of the composition would be approved by Busoni too!!!!
12345qazx1 1 year ago
w il canada!
outsider950 1 year ago
I always use his performance as the model for reference! It's my favourite, although I quite like Helene Grimaud's interpretation, too. :-)
Snezhinka9 1 year ago
Thanks a lot for showing us this genius!
mauson1963 2 years ago
it's just a different timbre, personally i like piano and the chord sounds fine
pguitar13 2 years ago
you cannot possibly think that this sounds better than the (original, i might add) version of the chaconne for violin. even the first chord sounds so much worse.
Euclid34 2 years ago
Apples and squares.
One is for the piano, one is for the violin. This takes on a totally new temperament and is a product of a totally different aesthetic. Trying to compare them is better.
Especially when you use such subjective 'measures' as what 'sounds better'. Some people play the piano.
Haeronthegreat 2 years ago
The "original" can't be played on the modern violin with its bow that can only play two strings at a time. Hence all the chords that are rolled on the violin version.
That being said, about the only thing the piano version has in common with the violin version is the melody and chords. Since it is a virtuoso arrangement, the piano version sounds a lot heavier.
oracle2world 2 years ago 3
@oracle2world I would say the piano version is a lot more limited than the violin version. Bach clearly never intended the piece to be played on a clavi.
Ianthe22 1 year ago
de très loin la meilleure version que je connaisse! une petite parenthèse d'intimité, hors du monde, où tout est sincère, j'admire infiniment ce que Monsieur Hamelin transmet ici, ce petit moment magique et en même temps d'un désespoir profond! Mille merci d'avoir posté cette vidéo
Schubermann 2 years ago
C'est très beau en effet , mais vous négligez les versions historiques de Busoni et d'Egon Petri ?
TheVieuxchat 2 years ago
non, je ne néglige rien, mais je vais là où je suis ému et touché! et aussi "historiques" soient elles, les autres versions me touchent moins, c'est subjectif et très personnel, libre à chacun d'aimer plus une version que d'autres!
Schubermann 2 years ago
too much pedal in the first cords but its still great
brandix30000 2 years ago
Comment removed
umutkaraca 2 years ago
Comment removed
Frozentoes1 2 years ago
superbe ! Pas besoin d'en dire davantage.
tomarsupilami 2 years ago 5
I think Hamelin is SOOOO amazing! I'm not having any luck---is there a CD/mp3 available of his Chaconne?
taiwan886 2 years ago 5
I agree!
chazman222 2 years ago
Beautifully put together. A thrilling performance. Thanks for posting.
ahilacat26 2 years ago 2
Excellent performance of an excellent music-piece.
wolkowy1 2 years ago
More than mechanical capability is required to sustain my interest. It has a lot to do with what's between the ears. He knows how to put it together and bring out his heart felt expression. That is when it becomes superfluous. I enjoyed this very much.
wildejag 3 years ago 10
i don't believe in the who's better nonsense, at least not when you get to that level, they are different and each very accomplished and respected in their own way. i heard hamelin play live at ikif festival during the summer and it was surreal.
flies101 3 years ago 2
I agree. It's like trying to decide among vintage wines.
The "he/she's better than...." type of argument reminds me of the Gould recording of the Prokofiev Sonata and Scriabin works shortly after Horowitz's legendary recordings of the same works. In part, Gould wanted to "one up" the master; he was Gould's rival (in his mind, I think) at any rate, the critics were split. Bottom line: both are fantastic recordings viewed from two very different perspectives..both high art..both vintage wine.
Frozentoes1 3 years ago
actually, i agree with you 100% on that cuz i major for the piano in college and i play basketball as well and piano needs some form of conditioning like basketball (although Basketball obviously needs much much more since it's a sport)
JlDsanity 3 years ago
i associate finger agility with physical fitness but hamelin doesnt look fit anymore
callenishss 3 years ago
very moving!! one of my favorite pieces!!!
duhhh86 3 years ago
Top notch performance. I love Hamelin's way of treating Busoni transcription, a real seven degree climbing. Amazing
wironalga 3 years ago
wonderful!!! I also like Grimaud's version...both are excellent.
beckerpwnsyou 3 years ago
Yes I really like Grimaud's performance of this work. As a woman I can say that this is a very difficult work to play if you haven't got huge hands so Grimaud does an amazing job.
ahilacat26 2 years ago
yes, she does a good job. the only problem is that -totally considered- her ciaccona TASTES LIKE PAPER
pianofolle 2 years ago
First time I've heard this being performed on piano. Very interesting
orientalnegro 3 years ago 3
Glorious ..Bach/Busoni/Hamelin ...made in Heaven scenario...
shela2 3 years ago 2
eccezionale! this is bach's chaconne!
frice007 3 years ago
Caro Golberg lei ha ragione,credo. M Tipo stacca tempo più lento in parecchi punti. Michelangelli ne dà una versione febbrile e angosciata. Questo Hamelin è un vero fuoriclasse !!!! o no? Un saluto
ilovescarlatti 3 years ago
A much simpler transcription, truer to the actual music by Bach, is the Brahms transcription for piano left hand (one can actually play it using both hands). You don't have to add notes to an already sublime piece to "make it better".
Vancouverite39 3 years ago
Busoni was a virtuoso PIANIST. This is for PIANO.
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago
le falta una parte
davidf996 4 years ago
This is an excelent performance!! Like everything Hamelin plays. When Busoni wrote this transcription he wasn't thinking about the original piece for the violin! He was probably trying to make the piano sound like a church organ or an orquestra!! This piece is more a Busoni piece then a Bach piece. A person saying that it should sound "like a violin piece" obviously doesn't know this transcrition well!!
mauriciostarosta 4 years ago 5
veramente molto bello impressionate la tecnica...una registrazione di maria tipo della emi gli assomiglia un po
goldberg72 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a sad performace. This is by far the worst I´ve ever heard a pianist perform Bachs chaconne. He plays as if it was written for piano.He should listen to a violonist perform it and learn something about Bachs violin music!
farsta1 4 years ago
That's because this transcription WAS written for piano. Busoni was a master pianist; Hamelin is playing his *transcription* of Bach's chaconne.
Hamelin is a very intelligent man; he is likely very aware that this piece was originally for violin, and has probably heard it a thousand times. Again, though: this is not a transcription in the style of solo violin, so what binds Hamelin to playing it as such?
veryangrystorks 4 years ago 2
(Also to farsta1): Furthermore, how does one play a piano in a violin-like manner? Sure, you might be able to turn some phrasing tricks, or roll chords in a certain way, but a piano is going to sound like a piano, whether you like it or not.
The same can be said of performing harpsichord works on piano. You're going to sound like a pianist, no matter how much you try to convince yourself that you sound like a harpsichordist. The two instruments are different. Get over it.
veryangrystorks 4 years ago 5
Interesting. What if the violinist tried to perform the piano transcription on the violin. What would we learn then, fartsa...oops pardon me...farsta?
Frozentoes1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree with you. The piano must vibrate like can a violin or human voice, specially in this thema of the beginning, veru intense. at least, give the illusion of that. Well in this performance, the chords are played like a percission as a piano. He's very intelligent but the intelligence without heart is a little boring.
palangsae 4 years ago
This transcription is supposed to sound like an organ, not a violin. Well, like a piano that sounds like an organ. Anyway, it's not meant to sound like the original form.
rihnem 3 years ago 3
Truly Outstanding!! Bravo!!!
Zengui 4 years ago
Great Performance! Passionate Bach performed with a glowing inner fire, without deforming the music. Love it!
Enerkhan 4 years ago
One of the best (and most musical) performances I've heard of this work is by Alicia de Larrocha and can be found on one of her Mostly Mozart recordings.
KennYWooD2 4 years ago
Ottima interpretazione...mi piace il suono che crea e la tecnica e' impressionante.
arrauottanta 4 years ago
Hamelin,s fine playing of this majestic work of Bach is beyond comparison!!.........
shela2 4 years ago 2
Michelangeli's version of this piece is amazing, but there are other beautiful ones by Arthur Rubinstein e Evgeny Kissin.
Thank you very much for this video.
mauriciostarosta 4 years ago
I have listened to Michelangeli's version once. I was not too impressed. I have played this piece, and I think Kissin's is the best. However after hearing Hamelin's version I think technically it is just as good as Kissin's. Though I think Kissin has the driven interpretation to carry it to peoples hearts.
maxscriptguru 4 years ago
YES. let's not even say 'why'. let's just LISTEN to it!! astonishing from many many points of view
pianofolle 2 years ago
I like this performance very much. Hamelin is a wonderful pianist. Thank god we have youtube, hehe. This pieces seems incredibly easy for him. Of course, his big hands help a lot with the many large streches this piece demands of the pianists.
There's a video of Michelangeli playing small parts of this piece in the beginning of the video of him playing the Ravel Concerte in G, with Celibidache.
mauriciostarosta 4 years ago
his thomb is huge, it remains me to Arrau's
danielito1979 4 years ago
it's 'reminds me' not 'remains me'.
lovethepiano 4 years ago
sorry english is not my language, jeezz
danielito1979 4 years ago
Unfortunately there is no video of the Michelangeli, just the recording on cd. Incidentally there is another great recording, not as good as Michelangeli, but very good nevertheless, by Jorge Bolet.
pvonberg 4 years ago
cool. i will look for it
brianCIM 4 years ago
Majestic! Bach if the Mt. Everst of Baroque music. There is clear and delicate individuation of the voices. Hamelin has tried to penetrate the core mystery of Bach's music. Almost but not quite. Bach and metaphysics are siblings. Both go down deep into the freshness of Be-ing!
nelyamaria 4 years ago
wish my parents weren't dumb and actually pushed me more to play Piano when I was small and stupid.... bleh
Suzuru 4 years ago
This is by Johann Sebastian Bach, not Jean Sebastien Bach right?
OorvakanSar 4 years ago
Pletnev is much better than Hamelin ,sorry
Nissor 4 years ago
wtf? Why type such stupid things? A performance is subjective. Provide a link to Pletnev playing this piece. if not stfu.
abnerpeabody 4 years ago
go to music store and buy " Pletnev live at Carnegie Hall" than if you have brains you would get it .
Nissor 4 years ago
Usually I dislike trolls, but as much as I hate to say it, Nissor is right.
Pletnev's performance in the live at Carnegie recording blows this one out of the water.
Someone mentioned Michelangeli, that's fantastic too.
If you look hard enough, there's a piano roll of this recorded by Busoni himself out there. It sounds very strange.
beakly 4 years ago
the michelangeli recording is the standard by which all others are judged. it was recorded in the 50's and when i heard it my jaw literally dropped. his color palette is astounding. no other recording even comes close. its on a CD that has the Brahms-Pagannini variations also. again the greatest performance ever. i urge you people to buy it. i will give you your money back if it doesnt blow your mind
brianCIM 4 years ago
I agree with you BrianCIM. But if you get a chance to hear Jack Gibbons, who plays regularly in the USA (he's British) you should also hear his Bach Chaconne which was unbelievable when I heard him NYC in c.2003. The NYC concert was filmed and I'm still trying to get hold of a tape of it!
alkanlover 4 years ago
if you do get a tape notify me. gibbons is a wonderful pianist and i have been playing alkan's music since i was 17. his recording of the concerto for solo piano is amazing. not as dry as hamelin's. i still love those old ronald smith recordings too.
brianCIM 4 years ago
@brianCIM Really? I find Gibbon's Alkan Concerto to be quite dry and uncertain in comparison to H'. ;)
twooffour 10 months ago
@twooffour have you watched the latest performance on YT. I think it is the greatest overall recording of that piece with Ronald Smith coming in as a close second. They just reposted the video. i will send it.
brianCIM 10 months ago
@brianCIM
But I was referring to that one :D
twooffour 10 months ago
@brianCIM
I'd like to take back the "uncertain" part - Hamelin does look and sound significantly more relaxed than Gibbons, but he does fuck up at some of the difficult leap passages in the 1st stages, and certainly makes smaller mistakes, too.
But his performance (both live and studio) is incomparable more fluent, interesting and exciting than Gibbons'.
twooffour 10 months ago
@brianCIM I think they are very different approaches. I have always felt Gibbons performance highlights the orchestral aspects of this amazing work better than Hamelin. Hamelin's i would say is more "pianistic" to use a generic word. it just doesn't feel as EPIC as Smith's or Gibbons and he rushes the hell out of the last movement glossing over some really amazing moments. You should know these are only SLIGHT criticisms, as MAH is a titanic pianist whom i admire tremendously.
brianCIM 10 months ago
@brianCIM To me the highlight of MAH's Alkan discography is his rendition of the Sonata which has no equal, even eclipsing Ronald Smith's wonderful recording. In particular i think his Quasi-Faust will never be bettered. He comes out of himself there and it is truly demonic with a handling of the 8-voice fugue that is simply beyond imagination. He also produces a sound that in its hugeness, for lack of a better word, has rarely been equaled in the history of pianism.
brianCIM 10 months ago
I agree, too bad there's no video to prove it, only audio from Carnegie Hall.
NeoMalikov 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1997 a girl called lauren was walikng in a forest and then a she just dissapeared no one ever found her untill 2000 when a yoing girl called Mary found her body and markings on her chest saying: I wasnt pretty enough" and now you have read this she will appear in your mirror saying your not pretty enough and kill you. by the way the girl called mary died shortly after.
To be saved paste this to 5 other videos. THIS TRUE.
xnik88x 4 years ago
This performance was awesome. I have not heard Michelangeli's recordings yet, but I have heard Kissin's and his is amazing.
ivrykeys 4 years ago
There's an amazing early tv film of Michelangeli playing the Bach Busoni Chaconne but it's hard to find. The best performance I ever heard of this piece was by Jack Gibbons in New York a few years ago. I'm told Gibbons video tapes all his performances but won't release the tapes!
alkanlover 4 years ago
i would give 10 years of my life to see that. where did you find the michelangeli video?
brianCIM 4 years ago
An extract from the video of Michalengeli playing the Bach Busoni Chaconne was shown on British tv (BBC, I think, or possibly Channel 4?) when they screened Michelageli's video performance of Debussy's Preludes Book 1 back in the 1980s. It was a studio recording of the Bach Busoni and my guess is it was made for Italian tv in the 50s or 60s. I keep hoping it will be released or show up on YouTube.
alkanlover 4 years ago
god if even a snippet of that chaconne video resurfaces notify me ASAP!
brianCIM 4 years ago
wonderful music.
radurak 4 years ago
Great video, though the sound isn't all that great; is there any place where we can access it with better sound quality?
Bordcla 4 years ago
one of the top 10 great virtuosos of all time!!!
anblanco333 4 years ago 2
i collect versions of this on cd... this one is really f*cking good!
daeviydt 4 years ago
truly the best performance of the piece that ive heard. i love hamelin.
goobleglob 4 years ago
hey just thought you should know about Michelangeli's recording (think he actually did 2) but i was in the train station in Stuttgart, Germany, and came across a load of REALLY cheap triple disk collections, the label is 'Worten Classico'. Michelangeli's contained the Chaconne. It is one of my favourite recordings that i own -and i have thousands, including 8 of this piece. It's a performance that stays with you. Enjoy! p.s. really enjoyed this recording too.
ollyztube 4 years ago 2
thanks. i'll look for it :) i love this piece so much.
goobleglob 4 years ago
See my note below on the film of Michelangeli's performance of this piece.
alkanlover 4 years ago