For someone who is so dedicated to the bproposition that we did land on the moon, it's funny finding you here on this comical video, going out of your way to refute what I've said. I'm particularly amazed at the way you intimate that the world couldn't be fooled. Look deeper into the matter and you'll find that many scientific minds have already come forward to question the veracity of the assertion that we got to the moon. You need to put less faith in Mythbusters or Penn and Teller.
The real paradox about your statement is that those who sincerely beleive that we did land on the moon cannot produce a shred of tangible and credible proof to support the position that they take in insisting that we did accomplish a moon landing. Those who so ardently deny that Man ever landed on the moon are not able either, to show conclusive evidence in that behalf. The situation is simply an understandable standoff with little more than heated personal speculation to fuel either argument.
@LongIslandEddie Tangible proof? Like the thousands of photographs and hours of video taken on the moon or in transit to and from? Or the 300+kg of lunar material brought back from the moon? Or the reports from the hundreds of thousands of people who worked on the program? There is a mountain of tangible proof which supports the moon landings. However you are correct that the hoaxers cannot show conclusive evidence that it didn't happen.
@TestTheAcid Obviously if you feel the proof listed below is all "laughable" then it would be far better for me to spend my time trying to help you find a good medical Doctor, Psychiatrist and Pharmacist to get your paranoid delusional psychosis under control. Besides, when the vast majority of intelligent, sane people on the planet agree that an event occurred, the burden of proof lies with those who refute it to proove it did not occur.
@valleytenderfoot YOU HAVNT LOOKED INTO IT AT ALL I CAN TELL THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WORK ON THE EVOLUTION IDEA TOO NO EVIDENCE THERE EITHER ITS JUST A RELIGION IF THEY WENT TO THE MOON IT WASNT THE THE NASA MISSIONS OF THE 60S THAT TOOK THEM THERE I CAN TELL YOUR NOT VERY INTELLIGENT THATS WHY IM NOT GOING TO ARGUE YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT ARGUING WITH IDIOTS! SARCASSM" Psychiatrist and Pharmacist to get your paranoid delusional psychosis under control. NEXT TIME LEAVE IT
@TestTheAcid Is English your first language? If it is not, I can understand why your typed replies are so poor. Your "ALL CAPS" type, poor spelling, poor grammar and run on sentences make it a bit difficult to follow you. (I am by no means claiming that my grasp of English is flawless, but I do try to make my replies legible.) Could I ask you to take the Caps Lock off and perhaps add some punctuation?
@valleytenderfoot I THINK IT IS YOU WHO NEEDS THE PSYCHIATRIST YOUR ARROGANT NARROW MINDED AND NAIVE AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TRY TO BEAT ME WITH NEXT WHAT POSSIBLE NON RELATED SUBJECT WILL YOU THRO BACK AT ME NEXT HOW ABOUT SOMETHING ON THE SUBJECT HERE ON THE WALL RATHER THAN GOING ON ABOUT YOURSELF AND HOW EVERY1 IS AN IDIOT AND HOW PUNCTUATION GETS TO YOU LIKE THAT!!! PSYCHOSIS, I THINK YOU RIGHT!!!!
@TestTheAcid If I was narrow minded I would simply repeat my particular beliefs over and over and not even entertain the thought of another possibility. I asked specific questions in the hopes that you could provide specific examples to support your argument that the Apollo program was a hoax. There have been many examples of hoax believers claiming generalities and arm waving but when specific examples are produced, so far they have been debunked.
@valleytenderfoot i simply do not have the time to entertain you or give you the explanation i feel this deserves 500 characters is not enough space to be able to write any explanation i understand that there are plenty of middleaged ppl like yourself who just cant believe they got duped by a crappy quality video from a military organisation i can watch ww2 in perfect colour but not the greatest event ever to be taken on by man are you also incapable of researching info yourself
@TestTheAcid I agree 500 characters is not enough space to effeciently debate these topics, however it is all we have.
As far as watching WW2 in "perfect colour" versus the "crappy quality" video from Apollo11, I guess there are some differences between the environment in Europe and the Pacific versus the moon which might impact the camera choices and quality of images recorded on, or transmitted from, the moon.
@TestTheAcid Are you referring to the portion that Bart says NASA sent him by mistake? If so, then no, it does not appear to be a fake. At least in that it does show Neil, Buzz and Mike in the CSM of Apollo 11, in space, somewhere between the Earth and the moon. Is it what NASA says it is (a rehersal for a planned live broadcast)? or what Bart says it is (the crew planning out how to decieve viewers as to their actual location)? It appears to me to be the former.
@TestTheAcid The specific clips that Bart shows on his film are edited snippets from the entire package he received from NASA (the ones he says he got by mistake). It would be nice to see the entire, un-edited selections of film from NASA of those days when Apollo 11 was transiting to the moon. I don't know if they are available online from the NASA Apollo video library, I'll have to take a look.
@TestTheAcid Oh, and I never said anyone was an idiot (I don't recall that at any rate... I'll read back through some older posts). The punctuation issue doesn't get to me, it just makes it slightly more difficult to read your replies. Typing in All Caps doesn't make your replies easier to understand either, but thank you for the thought. Net etiquette suggests that typing in All Caps is the same as yelling in person, so it appears from your replies that you are upset or just.... yelling.
@valleytenderfoot "Banned in America: Proof of Fake Moonlanding" watch this vid this is your astronauts faking something and if you got the time and inteligence how about you answer some questions!!!???!!!
@TestTheAcid An interesting clip from Bart's film. The whole film is more interesting to watch of course. The title is "sensationalized", neither the video clip nor the whole film is "banned in America" but I guess that gets more viewers than the content would on its' own. What questions do you have?
@LongIslandEddie YUP ALL THOSE PHOTOS ARE A DISCRACE TO US ALL STILL CLASSED AS PROOF WHEN IT HAS BEEN PROOVED NASA HAS ALTERED MOST OF THEM THERFORE ALL DISCREDITED CANT BE USED AS PROOF THERE IS THE FUEL ISSUE HOW ABOUT THE "ROVER" ISSUE TOO MANY MORE BUT CANT BE BOTHERED WASTING MY TIME TRYING TO SHOW PPL LIKE vallytenderfoot
@TestTheAcid Who "proved" any NASA photos were altered? What exactly did the "altering" involve? If "...NASA has altered most of them (the photos)..." why would you discredit all of them when your statement would indicate that some photos must be un-altered and therefore valid? Which photos are altered and which photos are not? If you have "looked into it" you must know these things, correct?
@valleytenderfoot FIRST OF ALL IF YOU CANT READ THIS GRAB YOUR YOUR MAM TO HELP YOU OUT I PUT IT IN CAPS TO HELP YOU. THERE YA GO...... NOW GO LOOK FOR LUNAR PICTURES IF YOU CANT TELL THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ALTERED YOU NEED YA EYES TESTED I CANT BE ARSED TAKING MY TIME WITH GRAMMAR N SPELLING SO COPE WITH IT LET ALONE PREACH TO PPL WHO ARE LAZY AND CANT BE ARSED THEMSELVES TO LOOK!!! SMUGES, FALSE HORIZONS, NO STARS, PROPS, LUNAR ROVERS, LIGHTING, FUEL, PLZ LOOK YOURSELF
@TestTheAcid How can you expect to be taken seriously when you won't take the time to make your statements as clear as possible? To promote an idea and expect others to believe it, or at least intelligently debate it, requires fairly clear communication.
No stars in photographs has been thoroughly worked over by a number of experts and clearly explained. Smudges...? are there too many, not enough... what specifically about smudges? What objects are props? The "C" rock? What about the rovers?
The gig is up! Man has has YET to traverse the Van Allen Radiation Shield. He can't do it it with today's technology and he certainly couldn't in 1969.
@philomorphologian YES VERY TRUE CARDBOARD AND STICKYTAPE THATS WHAT THE LANDER WAS MADE OF KIDS X-CEPT AT YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL KIDS WOULD DO A BETTER JOB
This video proves that the moon landing was faked. In your face moon lading believers!
3KS26 2 months ago
@TheJomogogo ANOTHER LUNATIC RUNNING HIS MOUTH WITH NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO ADD
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
Yo, Jomo
For someone who is so dedicated to the bproposition that we did land on the moon, it's funny finding you here on this comical video, going out of your way to refute what I've said. I'm particularly amazed at the way you intimate that the world couldn't be fooled. Look deeper into the matter and you'll find that many scientific minds have already come forward to question the veracity of the assertion that we got to the moon. You need to put less faith in Mythbusters or Penn and Teller.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
another great vid buddy,you crack me up with these dolls. LongIslandEddie,geezuz man,just enjoy the vid...and YES,we did go there.
noblepuker 2 years ago
They NEVER got there. End of discussion.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
You can end the discussion once you prove it
EdikShepherd 2 years ago
The real paradox about your statement is that those who sincerely beleive that we did land on the moon cannot produce a shred of tangible and credible proof to support the position that they take in insisting that we did accomplish a moon landing. Those who so ardently deny that Man ever landed on the moon are not able either, to show conclusive evidence in that behalf. The situation is simply an understandable standoff with little more than heated personal speculation to fuel either argument.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
Agreed. The argument should be dropped between both sides.
EdikShepherd 2 years ago
@LongIslandEddie Tangible proof? Like the thousands of photographs and hours of video taken on the moon or in transit to and from? Or the 300+kg of lunar material brought back from the moon? Or the reports from the hundreds of thousands of people who worked on the program? There is a mountain of tangible proof which supports the moon landings. However you are correct that the hoaxers cannot show conclusive evidence that it didn't happen.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot and no proof that it did happen show me proof which isnt laughable
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid Obviously if you feel the proof listed below is all "laughable" then it would be far better for me to spend my time trying to help you find a good medical Doctor, Psychiatrist and Pharmacist to get your paranoid delusional psychosis under control. Besides, when the vast majority of intelligent, sane people on the planet agree that an event occurred, the burden of proof lies with those who refute it to proove it did not occur.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot YOU HAVNT LOOKED INTO IT AT ALL I CAN TELL THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WORK ON THE EVOLUTION IDEA TOO NO EVIDENCE THERE EITHER ITS JUST A RELIGION IF THEY WENT TO THE MOON IT WASNT THE THE NASA MISSIONS OF THE 60S THAT TOOK THEM THERE I CAN TELL YOUR NOT VERY INTELLIGENT THATS WHY IM NOT GOING TO ARGUE YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT ARGUING WITH IDIOTS! SARCASSM" Psychiatrist and Pharmacist to get your paranoid delusional psychosis under control. NEXT TIME LEAVE IT
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid Is English your first language? If it is not, I can understand why your typed replies are so poor. Your "ALL CAPS" type, poor spelling, poor grammar and run on sentences make it a bit difficult to follow you. (I am by no means claiming that my grasp of English is flawless, but I do try to make my replies legible.) Could I ask you to take the Caps Lock off and perhaps add some punctuation?
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot I THINK IT IS YOU WHO NEEDS THE PSYCHIATRIST YOUR ARROGANT NARROW MINDED AND NAIVE AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TRY TO BEAT ME WITH NEXT WHAT POSSIBLE NON RELATED SUBJECT WILL YOU THRO BACK AT ME NEXT HOW ABOUT SOMETHING ON THE SUBJECT HERE ON THE WALL RATHER THAN GOING ON ABOUT YOURSELF AND HOW EVERY1 IS AN IDIOT AND HOW PUNCTUATION GETS TO YOU LIKE THAT!!! PSYCHOSIS, I THINK YOU RIGHT!!!!
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid If I was narrow minded I would simply repeat my particular beliefs over and over and not even entertain the thought of another possibility. I asked specific questions in the hopes that you could provide specific examples to support your argument that the Apollo program was a hoax. There have been many examples of hoax believers claiming generalities and arm waving but when specific examples are produced, so far they have been debunked.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot i simply do not have the time to entertain you or give you the explanation i feel this deserves 500 characters is not enough space to be able to write any explanation i understand that there are plenty of middleaged ppl like yourself who just cant believe they got duped by a crappy quality video from a military organisation i can watch ww2 in perfect colour but not the greatest event ever to be taken on by man are you also incapable of researching info yourself
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid I agree 500 characters is not enough space to effeciently debate these topics, however it is all we have.
As far as watching WW2 in "perfect colour" versus the "crappy quality" video from Apollo11, I guess there are some differences between the environment in Europe and the Pacific versus the moon which might impact the camera choices and quality of images recorded on, or transmitted from, the moon.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot is it a fake,FAKE movie clip???
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid Are you referring to the portion that Bart says NASA sent him by mistake? If so, then no, it does not appear to be a fake. At least in that it does show Neil, Buzz and Mike in the CSM of Apollo 11, in space, somewhere between the Earth and the moon. Is it what NASA says it is (a rehersal for a planned live broadcast)? or what Bart says it is (the crew planning out how to decieve viewers as to their actual location)? It appears to me to be the former.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid The specific clips that Bart shows on his film are edited snippets from the entire package he received from NASA (the ones he says he got by mistake). It would be nice to see the entire, un-edited selections of film from NASA of those days when Apollo 11 was transiting to the moon. I don't know if they are available online from the NASA Apollo video library, I'll have to take a look.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid Oh, and I never said anyone was an idiot (I don't recall that at any rate... I'll read back through some older posts). The punctuation issue doesn't get to me, it just makes it slightly more difficult to read your replies. Typing in All Caps doesn't make your replies easier to understand either, but thank you for the thought. Net etiquette suggests that typing in All Caps is the same as yelling in person, so it appears from your replies that you are upset or just.... yelling.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot "Banned in America: Proof of Fake Moonlanding" watch this vid this is your astronauts faking something and if you got the time and inteligence how about you answer some questions!!!???!!!
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid An interesting clip from Bart's film. The whole film is more interesting to watch of course. The title is "sensationalized", neither the video clip nor the whole film is "banned in America" but I guess that gets more viewers than the content would on its' own. What questions do you have?
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@LongIslandEddie YUP ALL THOSE PHOTOS ARE A DISCRACE TO US ALL STILL CLASSED AS PROOF WHEN IT HAS BEEN PROOVED NASA HAS ALTERED MOST OF THEM THERFORE ALL DISCREDITED CANT BE USED AS PROOF THERE IS THE FUEL ISSUE HOW ABOUT THE "ROVER" ISSUE TOO MANY MORE BUT CANT BE BOTHERED WASTING MY TIME TRYING TO SHOW PPL LIKE vallytenderfoot
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid Who "proved" any NASA photos were altered? What exactly did the "altering" involve? If "...NASA has altered most of them (the photos)..." why would you discredit all of them when your statement would indicate that some photos must be un-altered and therefore valid? Which photos are altered and which photos are not? If you have "looked into it" you must know these things, correct?
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot FIRST OF ALL IF YOU CANT READ THIS GRAB YOUR YOUR MAM TO HELP YOU OUT I PUT IT IN CAPS TO HELP YOU. THERE YA GO...... NOW GO LOOK FOR LUNAR PICTURES IF YOU CANT TELL THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ALTERED YOU NEED YA EYES TESTED I CANT BE ARSED TAKING MY TIME WITH GRAMMAR N SPELLING SO COPE WITH IT LET ALONE PREACH TO PPL WHO ARE LAZY AND CANT BE ARSED THEMSELVES TO LOOK!!! SMUGES, FALSE HORIZONS, NO STARS, PROPS, LUNAR ROVERS, LIGHTING, FUEL, PLZ LOOK YOURSELF
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
@TestTheAcid How can you expect to be taken seriously when you won't take the time to make your statements as clear as possible? To promote an idea and expect others to believe it, or at least intelligently debate it, requires fairly clear communication.
No stars in photographs has been thoroughly worked over by a number of experts and clearly explained. Smudges...? are there too many, not enough... what specifically about smudges? What objects are props? The "C" rock? What about the rovers?
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
no not end of discussion
justintagger 2 years ago
how can you be that sure about staff you don't know
ThjeshtLife 2 years ago
@LongIslandEddie TRY TELLING VALLYTENDERFOOT THAT
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
the headline is the funniest thing^^
TTurkletonandJD 2 years ago
is that G.I joe????
marycozzens 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The gig is up! Man has has YET to traverse the Van Allen Radiation Shield. He can't do it it with today's technology and he certainly couldn't in 1969.
procommenter 2 years ago
could have been funny
andythefork 3 years ago
It just goes to prove that it's the imaginative idea that makes something like this really work; not just the recycled cardboard.
philomorphologian 3 years ago
@philomorphologian YES VERY TRUE CARDBOARD AND STICKYTAPE THATS WHAT THE LANDER WAS MADE OF KIDS X-CEPT AT YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL KIDS WOULD DO A BETTER JOB
TestTheAcid 1 year ago
lmaoooooo
zi0nli0n714 3 years ago
Hahahaha
Artifalia 3 years ago