I like how when this lady realizes that she can't answer the questions being posed to her, she starts yelling into her bullhorn. It's a common tactic with these people. If they can't dispute information presented to them, they either change the subject, or they will do something similar to what this lady did.
@deliciousmorton For example, if the argument is about whether or not the wtc was taken down by a controlled demolition, and they are presents evidence that disproves their claim, they will suddenly switch to something like "it wasn't a plane that crashed into the pentagon." It's is almost impossible to have a rational discussion with these people because they never stay on topic. They are scatterbrained.
Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
o Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
What Religio-racist language, words Like islamo-fascist? or goyim? How about the Mossad agents that cheered as he towers fell? Now your calling me neo nazi? You fucking wish. I like jews but 9/11 was done by a gold key club and Mossad helped.
A Boeing 767 cannot reach 590mph at 700 ft altitude, the power plant at that altitude will max out at 330 mph. Aerodynamically the plane could only reach approx 250 Mph at 700 ft altitude, the engines begin to act as brakes because of the thick air.
A 767 can only travel at those speeds at 35000 ft.
Boeing give no data (pilot guidelines)below 15000 ft at those speeds as the plane would be ripped apart.
Conclusion - no planes just fake images to cover missile strikes.
NO IM NOT!, also at that altitude above the planes VMO there is an FAA required device that operates at a rate and cycle to irritate the pilot,(clack, clack , clack, clack, clack , clack,) he/she has to back off, so as not to break the air craft, not to mention the stick shaker at the same time. ALL THE FOOTAGE OF PLANES HITTING THE TOWERS ON 9/11 IS FAKE!!, WAKEY WAKEY PEOPLE. DO YOUR OWN REASERCH, YOU WILL SEE IM CORRECT.
Look, I fly airplanes for a living. The clacker denotes an aircraft approaching overspeed. It doesn't require the pilot to "back off", and just because its going off doesn't mean that the aircraft is going to immediately break apart. Commercial aircraft are designed well above whats considered operationally safe. The stick shaker activates when a stall approaches NOT for an overspeed. The clacker is an attention getter, nothing more.
Thes people are freaking crazy. They actually WANT to believe what they say, not what they see, not physics, or facts. They are like a traumatized child who thinks up an invisible friend to deal with tradgedy. Fucking sad.
If it was a natural collapse the center beam would still be standing, only a controlled demolition would pull the entire thing down. Speaking of beam, those who call others nutbats because they don't conform, have a beam in their eye. They cannot take it out, if they do their whole model of the world will collapse, so it is easier to call names.
what they're really saying is "I am a nutbat for not seeking truth" or "I will not be loved if I do not please my parents/government/boss and do or believe what I am told." It's worth doing a google on the psychology of bullying.
if it was a controlled demolition then the collapse would have started at the base of the tower, not the point of impact. If it were a controlled demolition, then they would have had to been planting explosives for a least a year prior without anyone who works there noticing
Im thinking using common sense moron, those towers were attacked by terrorists. There is not a shred of evidence for anything else. You guys always talk about thinking outside "common people" education. It's called logic and the only reason none of you guys follow it is because you want to feel like you matter and you want to feel special.
This all just marginalizes the radical left even further than they already are. The radical left are the most brainwashed people in our society. They are the most easily duped. 9/11 is the best example. THANK YOU NOAM CHOMSKY FOR TELLING IT LIKE IT IS. PEACE
It is very easy for a Leftist to make the jump from ; we were attacked, to Bush did it(or the shadow govt, or Cheney or the illuminati) The problem for them is, they don't even have a consensus in their own camp. Their ideological leader Noam Chomsky doesn't buy into the CT's. Even people who don't agree with Chomsky still respect him
Notice how charmingdv8nt says the guy is an "obvious young Republican"? This is very telling to the psychosis of the CT's They think it is a mostly Republican thing. This also tells us CDV8nt has a far left personal ideology. I'd bet anything 80% of the 9/11 CT's are radicals.
If you did a bit of research yourself you'll discover that actually the middle frame would still be standing if it was a natural collapse. There was no metal whatsoever on ground zero. Don't kill yourself when you wake to find that you've been a real prick to people who are not sheep. Explain the frame. Case closed.
AhHAA, That was great. Why in the world would you try to argue with these freaks? Just let them be. We will see charmingdevant in 10 years with a straightjacket, foaming at the mouth, still crying about this delusional CT. I cant wait.
she said its the "invisible government" and the dumbass asking the questions went ahead with his "is bush smart enough" question anyway without even acknowledging that she just said it wasnt bush, but the shadow government that controls him. haha, what a retard, do your research.. and btw popular mechanics is paid to say whatever they want them to say
I like how when this lady realizes that she can't answer the questions being posed to her, she starts yelling into her bullhorn. It's a common tactic with these people. If they can't dispute information presented to them, they either change the subject, or they will do something similar to what this lady did.
deliciousmorton 1 year ago
@deliciousmorton For example, if the argument is about whether or not the wtc was taken down by a controlled demolition, and they are presents evidence that disproves their claim, they will suddenly switch to something like "it wasn't a plane that crashed into the pentagon." It's is almost impossible to have a rational discussion with these people because they never stay on topic. They are scatterbrained.
deliciousmorton 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job!
ParadigmShift22 1 year ago
@ParadigmShift22
no, you just want it to be one.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ParadigmShift22
btw, an excellent question was posted here a couple of months ago that you should answer. if you can, of course....
Why is fireproofing put on the steel framed buildings in the first place?
well?
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
She says they are the ones with the alternate theory when she and her group of morons are the one with the alternate theory
MrFlyerGuy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
Les Jamieson
National Coordinator
NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative / NYCCAN
NYsentinel 2 years ago
o Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
Les Jamieson NYCCAN
NYsentinel 2 years ago
how does only building 7 share foundations with 1 and 2, with building 6 in the middle.i cant find any evidence of this claim
miserkocho 2 years ago
That woman is pointless.
hgjt678 2 years ago
Nice
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Nobody knows what the fuck happened...
AdamnationZ 3 years ago
everybody knows what happned
gabledorf 3 years ago
What Religio-racist language, words Like islamo-fascist? or goyim? How about the Mossad agents that cheered as he towers fell? Now your calling me neo nazi? You fucking wish. I like jews but 9/11 was done by a gold key club and Mossad helped.
Eidelmania 3 years ago
Demolition was used. High levels of radioactive elements were found.
lancia2002 3 years ago
When faced with facts troofers response is to shout down facts
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
shes a stupid fat hippie bitch that thinks bush bombd the twin towers i HATE people like her!
wikabomb 3 years ago
A Boeing 767 cannot reach 590mph at 700 ft altitude, the power plant at that altitude will max out at 330 mph. Aerodynamically the plane could only reach approx 250 Mph at 700 ft altitude, the engines begin to act as brakes because of the thick air.
A 767 can only travel at those speeds at 35000 ft.
Boeing give no data (pilot guidelines)below 15000 ft at those speeds as the plane would be ripped apart.
Conclusion - no planes just fake images to cover missile strikes.
Anunnaki12 3 years ago
I have the 767 Pilot's Operating Handbook and you are WRONG
ual777222 3 years ago
NO IM NOT!, also at that altitude above the planes VMO there is an FAA required device that operates at a rate and cycle to irritate the pilot,(clack, clack , clack, clack, clack , clack,) he/she has to back off, so as not to break the air craft, not to mention the stick shaker at the same time. ALL THE FOOTAGE OF PLANES HITTING THE TOWERS ON 9/11 IS FAKE!!, WAKEY WAKEY PEOPLE. DO YOUR OWN REASERCH, YOU WILL SEE IM CORRECT.
Anunnaki12 3 years ago 2
Ive done my research and I'm not afraid to say I agree with you Anunnaki12.
FormalScience 3 years ago
Look, I fly airplanes for a living. The clacker denotes an aircraft approaching overspeed. It doesn't require the pilot to "back off", and just because its going off doesn't mean that the aircraft is going to immediately break apart. Commercial aircraft are designed well above whats considered operationally safe. The stick shaker activates when a stall approaches NOT for an overspeed. The clacker is an attention getter, nothing more.
ual777222 3 years ago
should be called "deny truth movement" then it would all make sense
gabledorf 3 years ago
Thes people are freaking crazy. They actually WANT to believe what they say, not what they see, not physics, or facts. They are like a traumatized child who thinks up an invisible friend to deal with tradgedy. Fucking sad.
rickrocker 4 years ago 6
I love moonbat, CT leftists... You try to have a passionate discussion with them and they chant you down. Fascists.
nikolai082700 4 years ago
They are lunatics. Who are these people? Where do they come from?
rickrocker 4 years ago 4
If it was a natural collapse the center beam would still be standing, only a controlled demolition would pull the entire thing down. Speaking of beam, those who call others nutbats because they don't conform, have a beam in their eye. They cannot take it out, if they do their whole model of the world will collapse, so it is easier to call names.
melindajlaidlaw 4 years ago
what they're really saying is "I am a nutbat for not seeking truth" or "I will not be loved if I do not please my parents/government/boss and do or believe what I am told." It's worth doing a google on the psychology of bullying.
melindajlaidlaw 4 years ago
if it was a controlled demolition then the collapse would have started at the base of the tower, not the point of impact. If it were a controlled demolition, then they would have had to been planting explosives for a least a year prior without anyone who works there noticing
panthers557 4 years ago 4
who says its explosives used.. think outside the common people education
melindajlaidlaw 4 years ago
Im thinking using common sense moron, those towers were attacked by terrorists. There is not a shred of evidence for anything else. You guys always talk about thinking outside "common people" education. It's called logic and the only reason none of you guys follow it is because you want to feel like you matter and you want to feel special.
panthers557 4 years ago 3
Don't lump us Libs with these idiots.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
This all just marginalizes the radical left even further than they already are. The radical left are the most brainwashed people in our society. They are the most easily duped. 9/11 is the best example. THANK YOU NOAM CHOMSKY FOR TELLING IT LIKE IT IS. PEACE
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
It is very easy for a Leftist to make the jump from ; we were attacked, to Bush did it(or the shadow govt, or Cheney or the illuminati) The problem for them is, they don't even have a consensus in their own camp. Their ideological leader Noam Chomsky doesn't buy into the CT's. Even people who don't agree with Chomsky still respect him
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
Notice how charmingdv8nt says the guy is an "obvious young Republican"? This is very telling to the psychosis of the CT's They think it is a mostly Republican thing. This also tells us CDV8nt has a far left personal ideology. I'd bet anything 80% of the 9/11 CT's are radicals.
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
LOL tried to post i got censored...again
matrixoverkill 4 years ago
Hey Scummy deviant, How come I cant comment on your stuff? SCARED? You should be. It's 2007 holmes. Your movement is really going places. LOL
By the way, It's JRockFish to you essa. Maybe you can ask someone what that refers to.
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
If you did a bit of research yourself you'll discover that actually the middle frame would still be standing if it was a natural collapse. There was no metal whatsoever on ground zero. Don't kill yourself when you wake to find that you've been a real prick to people who are not sheep. Explain the frame. Case closed.
melindajlaidlaw 4 years ago
You're following a "movement". FOLLOWING. That sounds like 'sheep' to me.
rickrocker 4 years ago
AhHAA, That was great. Why in the world would you try to argue with these freaks? Just let them be. We will see charmingdevant in 10 years with a straightjacket, foaming at the mouth, still crying about this delusional CT. I cant wait.
JRCKFSH 4 years ago
"it doesn't look anything like a controlled demolition"
omfg
downwiththenwo 4 years ago
omfg...why don't you try arguing?
KaneKaizer 4 years ago
arguing with what?
downwiththenwo 4 years ago
she said its the "invisible government" and the dumbass asking the questions went ahead with his "is bush smart enough" question anyway without even acknowledging that she just said it wasnt bush, but the shadow government that controls him. haha, what a retard, do your research.. and btw popular mechanics is paid to say whatever they want them to say
wickkidda 4 years ago
Fine, check my channel. I'm a freakin kid. Am I on the gov't payroll to go around youtube spreading anti-conspiracy-theorist propaganda?
TheRealDom 4 years ago
Get your head out of your ass moonbat bitch.
KaneKaizer 4 years ago
bwahahahaaaa........
kender1 4 years ago