Ronald Reagan acted through 8 years of being President. Told what to say most times- another acting gig for the gipper. Look at his style, head just right, empahsis on the right word! The man who played President.
@Cerl84 How right you are. The strength of President Reagan's administration is the way he ran it like a business. Got the best and the brightest minds together, and brought us out of the malaise darkness of the Carter administration. Reagan knew that one person alone is not as strong as a team.
Indeed a great presider over our nation, not an authoritarian like we have now. We in 2012 are now lead by the weakest administration yet, filled with misfits and marxists...Obamas buddies.
I am very happy to see the vidoe Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
Steady I Really Like This Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today
Good, I like that you share this video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today, I wish success always
Nice Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
I Really Like The Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today From Your
Your Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today Is Very Useful Sharing
Obama Increased National Debt More in 4 Days Than Truman and Eisenhower Did in 10 Years! Last week the Obama administration reportedly increased the national debt (in inflation-adjusted dollars) more in a mere four days than the administrations of Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower increased it from 1950-1960 — an entire decade.
@FranklyMisterShankly Not to mention that the Soviets didn't 'invade' Afghanistan but had been begged by the socialist government of Afghanistan to send troops to help stamp out a radical Islamic insurgency. The fundamentalist Muslims were angry because the socialist government was sending women to school and banning the veil. The response of the Islamic fundies to female education? Bombing schools and acid attacks. If you think backwards Islamic fundies were the heroes I don't know why.
@djflargo Is Obama a Marxist-Leninist, Trotskyist, or Maoist? I support Leninist ideas but I don't think the US has a large enough rural/peasant population for Maoism to be applicable. I've never really read any of Obama's Marxist writings so I've got to remember to look those up.
Three remarkable women who, following the deaths of their husbands, helped enhance the enormous veneration of their spouses' memories are Nancy Reagan, Jacqueline Kennedy and Coretta Scott King. Without the presence and dignity of these three widows at their husbands' funerals and beyond, I doubt that we would have seen such an immediate acceptance of their husbands in America's national pantheon of heroes.
What are the odds...? Have you seen this reported anywhere other than alternative media? Have you seen it in the Drive-Bys or the State-Controlled Media?
It was a state teacher or state job of some kind. It was not a private sector job. Even at that: $278,000 per job. So they admit up front. Now, they have to do this. You wonder, "Well, why would they admit this?"
They do it on a Friday, Fourth of July weekend when nobody's paying any attention.
ladies and gentlemen, the regime on Friday made a document dump. The Obama regime admitted that the stimulus didn't accomplish anything. They admitted that every job created by the stimulus cost about $278,000, and let's remember that every job created by the stimulus was a government job.
Without the presence and dignity of these three widows at their husbands' funerals and beyond, I doubt that we would have seen such an immediate acceptance of their husbands in America's national pantheon of heroes.
War solved nothing...except end slavery, fascism, Nazism, and Communism...but other than that war has never settled anything...well, except birth the freest nation on earth in the American Revolution from Britain...but besides that war is always bad...except Pope Urban in 1099 A.D. FINALLY decided that Europe needed to defend itself from the Global Islamic Jihad that was unleashed in 632 A.D., but besides that...war is always wrong...
peace at all costs is slavery.. Auschwitz is the end result in compliance to tyranny. IT seamed peaceful all the time while the ovens burned. "Work will set you free" is what their sign said. No one was set free. There are times you have to stand against tyranny or die in oppression.
War does not decide who is right, but who is left.
There is a religion that preaches that all those oppose it are to die, and those who take on this mission, to carry it out will get the greatest glory on the other side, no matter how many innocent lives are taken in the process. So how do you deal with someone who is ready and willing to die to kill you, even if they have to take out a building full of children to do it.
@djflargo You really don't have a clue what a marxist is do you?
The worst US president by the way was Warren G Harding who appointed the Ohio Gang to cabinet posts who embezzled from the government, had 4 mistresses while in office and was rumored to have been a member of the Klu Klux Klan & was involved in the Teapot Dome Affair.
James Buchanan is the second worst. Under his watch 7 states succeeded from the union, the economy tanked and the civil war started.
... but this nation has arguably never seen the kind of bold, crudely calculated and ideologically driven legend-manufacturing as has taken place with Ronald Reagan.
... It is a myth machine ... – “for misguided policies .... lowering taxes in the time of war” ....
“Tear Down This Myth: How Reagan's Legacy Haunts Our Future”, - By Will Bunch
Egalitarianism, the idea that merit should be totally removed from our economics, or that productiveness as judged by your own customers is not the most important economic merit, is its own evil. I don't care if takes the form of "right" or "left" socialism, whatever the hell that distinction is supposed to refer to. I will take "every man for himself" over "every man for every man but himself" anyday.
@Mental, Nah, not so. You have fallen for a big LIE. Read "The Twisted Cross" by Joe Carr. Hitler and the Nazis were National SOCIALISTS, a variant of SOCIALISM, which IS Left-Wing. The reason Liberals and Progressives LIE about Nazism and FALSELY say it is "Left-Wing" is to distance themselves from Hitler. For more ACTUAL FACTS/HISTORY see: "The Aquarian Conspiracy" by Marilyn Ferguson and "The Hidden dangers of The Rainbow" by Constance Cumby.
@KhmerD0g Reagan was smart, he got the Taliban to fight the Soviet Union, so we didn't have too! No different than FDR getting the Soviets on our side during WW2 to help defeat Germany!
Nonsense. The Taliban was fighting invaders and an occupation force--Soviet Union. American just gave the Taliban monies and weapons. Even if there were no American's helps, the Taliban still fight the Soviet on their own. Besides, the Taliban got help from Saudi Arabia, Iran (yes them too), Pakistan and many other Islamic countries who contribute monies, arms and other supplies.
@JENDALL714 learn the history of world war 2 will you , Winston Churchill reached out to josef dughashvilli and allied Britain with soviet russia to defeat hitler and nazi germany NOT fdr!
Fascism/Nazism IS National SOCIALISM. ALL Socialism IS Leftist/Liberal.
This is not 1713...we use terms and definitions as used today. Nor should we use terms and definitions as set be Leftists. Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, FDR, LBJ, Clinton, ObaMarxist have their view and definition of Fascism, Left-Wing and Conservatism, Right-Wing...I refuse to let Socialist, Left-Wing TYRANTS set the terms and definitions I use, I refuse to let Liberals/Leftists set the ROE.
@John76Adams Except National Socialism isn't socialism, it's fascism a system diametrically opposed to socialism, & not all socialism is left nor liberal. There is a reason the terms left & right socialism exist, there is a reason the term authoritarian socialism exists. This is 2011 when the right feels the need to redefine terms for the sake of painting the rightwing in a good light, not caring that all they are doing is making communication more difficult.
You are sooo WRONG. Nazism=National SOCIALISM!!! Nazism & Fascism are LEFTIST. Islam IS LEFTIST in that they too are a TYRANNY. And even The Marxist-Stalinist Soviet Union had its "gods"- all the pictures and statues of Lenin and Stalin. Commie China had/has it's adoration of Mao.
so enjoy the great things our savior" coke head, street activist" king obama has given you.
hey stupid what ya got
simple ass clown90 yes 90 rounds of golf 7 vacations.......oh yes dont forget his mantra i will not rest till more americans have jobs...............lol....blow here bootlips
PT2 That's in the works. Christians and Jews 1st. Islam wants them both gone. Godless ubers and Socialist/Athiests want all those gods to go, but, they'll except these tyrannal religiods. they'll soon selfdistruct. WE WIN!
PT1 Islam is liken to many tyannical idealogies. In fact, maybe they have come to some agreement with Comunist Russia during/after thier "war." Now the deal is in and Islamo is born & compete for power on the same Chessboard as the "those in power" of the world. I probably not so far afield on that one. It saddens me to see the use of endless wars to try & reduce the worlds population. Now, they'll have to come up with a much faster way to get a genesideal number to human population. CONT>>
YAY MISTER REAGAN! a lot of people dislike him but they can frankly go fuck themselves b/c he ended decades of possible nuclear conflict, and though he may have supplied alqueda but shit thats better than having a nuclear capable ussr bent on destroying capatilist nations, but on the other hand we were ready to do the same to them... pardon my language.
as much as you warmongers want to believe, war is NOT peace. Please get that through your Orwellian brains. Plus, Reagan was not even talking about terrorism which is a direct consequence of our foreign policy of interventionism of the past 60 years.
Ironically, - the same hYpocrites are using -'anti-sharia fear-factoring'- [red herring] to rile up their low-IQ - sheeple... ? “ do not want their type of law here ” ...
– which - we already have ! ___ Under the guise of being –‘more moral’- [than the non-God-fearing] - spun by Repub. politicians/media whores/relig-hypocrites..
@Soulvigilante guess we could say something nasty bout you too but we don't. islam isn't just a religion , it's also a political system,which makes it even more dangerous. leave the personal attacks off line.
@wjkolka I couldn't agree more that any religion that becomes also a political system is dangerous. I mean, imagine a country where zealotous religious doctrine dictates social policy; where the rights of, say, women and persons of alternative lifestyles are eschewed in favor of quasi-righteous politico-theological posturing...
LOL! Fascism is putting the needs of one specific group above the needs of the whole country! Maybe you should open up a dictionary for once in your life. Example: What Republicans do to Oil Companies; what the Nazis did to the Aryans. That's Fascism.
Absolute leftist society would include no religion whatsoever, which contradicts your claim that "islam is fascism, and fascism is leftism"
@thereddog223 LOL! War profits ALL privatized corporations, not just oil companies, do you know what Blackwater Worldwide is? Private military group, owned by a buddy of Dubya's.
War is about increasing profits for the big companies, why don't you see that?
And there's oil in the US, but not as much as there is in other countries.
The Bush Administration probably found it easier to convince people to invade another country than it was to persuade them to drill here.
@thereddog223 I'm sorry, not exempt, but they do get a huge tax break.
Btw, why do you keep focusing on only one single statement i make?
You'll pay attention to one thing that you know something (but very little about) and just pass over the keywords that make you uncomfortable.
Have you still not looked up fascism in the dictionary? You truly know how to debate! Yes point out that i'm making a fool of myself so i stop making you look like a retard, LOL!
@LeBaronDePropane Do you have any idea how many people in america pay no taxes at all? I can guarantee you that those NOT paying taxes certainly aren't rich.
Can you not fail at some point. I've read about 10 comments from you and each is more illogical than the last.
So, 10,000 homeless people not paying taxes is more detrimental than 1 billionare not paying taxes? 10,000 homeless people can't pay taxes. It's not like they're taking advantage of the system...
Logic is relative my friend, see your logic consists of selfishness, greed, and material advantage.
My logic isn't.
Oh btw, point out how i'm "illogical" and i'll correct my "inferior mindset" of social responsibility.
Don't bother responding if you're not going to address all subjects.
@LeBaronDePropane Yes 10,000 not working or having somewhere to live would be more detrimental than 1 200,000-aire (we're talking 200,000 here based on what the obama crew has said, not billion get something right please) paying HALF of what he/she made because of those not paying taxes. but not by much. And if you think that everyone not paying taxes is homeless your a twit. Go look up "US Government assistance programs". Then look up "State assistance Programs in america" Look into...
@LeBaronDePropane how many people in this country every year live better than most people in the freaking world because half of the country pays their damned taxes.
Logic is not relative you moron. Logic is fucking factual.
You can't get simple facts correct. look up the number of actual homeless in this country, then look up the number of people that pay $0 in taxes then look up the number of people making over 200,000 a year then we can start to talk about this shit. til then bmad
If you ask me, i've noticed in my area (New Jersey) most homeless people, when asked to come into a homeless shelter, refuse, even in 10 degree weather. I think it's a pride thing, and they don't want to be around other homeless people. A large portion of them are homeless due to Reagan's closing of mental hospitals in the 80's.
Logic: Noun; Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. Principles is the key word.
@daPlumber702 You're clearly not mature. You either have no real world experience, haven't opened a dictionary, and you like to be fed your 'facts'. OR you're just arrogant.
But it's okay to have experience in politics or humanity if you're under the age of 12. I mean, children are innocent, right? You don't need to dirty yourself with the corruption and lies of American politics until you're at LEAST 14.
@LeBaronDePropane I've had enough of complete tools like you that feel the only way to live life is to incorporate yourself into some type of borg structure and crush anyone that doesn't have the same numbers you do. You try to use false logic and brainless tactics to get a point across that is nothing but thievery. Fail elsewhere fuckwad.
@daPlumber702 No, were you? Do you have an impediment that prevents you from helping those in need, or from even reading books? I don't necessarily care about the methods brought about by improving social equality, just the end goal. If Ronald Reagan was truly out to save the poor and those who are incapable of working, then i would've liked him more. But that's proven wrong, refer to his closing of mental hospitals and causing thousands of mentally challenged people to live on the street.
@LeBaronDePropane I don't necessarily care about the methods brought about by improving social equality, just the end goal - therein lies your major malfunction numb nuts.
You should look up all the facts on that mental hospital shtuff you keep throwing around like it proves your point. You know, like how he allowed Private mental hospitals to open by closing the government funded ones, private facilities that greatly improve the quality of life compared to their public counterparts.
A vast majority of homeless people expelled from hospitals in the 80's are still homeless. Privatizing mental hospitals is making it a FOR PROFIT BUSINESS. How can you not see this? For example jails, they're owned by a group of people, and are given money by the state to feed the inmates. The jails then buy $2 for 12 pack ramen noddles, feed that to the inmates, and keep all of the real money for themselves! Private hospitals that can give lobotomies without regulation, cool!
@LeBaronDePropane It worked because it wasn't communism, or even socialism. It was large group of loosely governed tribes. Plus they didn't have enough time to evolve. With the amount of information and corruption that can spread so rapidly in modern times, it is best to keep government small, before it gets too big to oppress the people.
The Iroquois League was an enormous Commonwealth that consisted of representatives from each tribe in the League. The Iroquois Nation had one specific language and currency, and no matter how much an individual worked in a day, they would still share in the bounty of their local community. That is the ideal government (pre-dated, non-industrial Communism). You are nothing more than a disrespectful pig spitting on the graves of the innocent and pure.
@LeBaronDePropane Yes, less evolved to modern standards, obviously. I stated my point above. And exactly. Tribes. We don't have tribes consisting of a small group of the population. Get over it bro. Communism/hardline socialism is and will be dead. It doesn't work because of human greed and utter lack of incentive. In a perfect world, sure it could work...but it isn't. At least capitalism makes use of human greed and uses it towards advancement and competition.
Capitalist system: the minimum wage worker can't afford a new car, TV, or to move his home whenever he pleases.
Communist system: EXACTLY THE SAME
Communism doesn't take the property of the working man BECAUSE HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY TO BEGIN WITH.
The only difference is that with Capitalism, there's always that carrot in front of you saying "You could be a millionaire someday in the land of opportunity!" But it's nothing more than a lie. If you are born a peasant, you'll die a peasant.
@LeBaronDePropane That isn't true at all. My mother for example was born in a not so wealthy family, and she has worked very hard and makes a very good living now. So i guess that throws your theory out of the window.
If you are good at something, you invest the hard work, and be genuine, it will pay off eventually.
Here's a scenario. I'm born to a family (today) of 6 children and my father abandoned me. We live in a 2 bedroom apartment, so we all have to share a bed. If it's hard to get a job in the modern economy, imagine competing against 5 siblings! Then i'll never go to college, because my mother can't pay for college for all of us. Result: minimum wage for the rest of me and my siblings lives.
Your mother did it 20+ years ago? The times, they are a changin'!
@LeBaronDePropane My mom has 3 siblings and her dad died after the last one was born. They had a small house. She studied and got a scholarship, went to college and is now a network engineer at a federally funded agency which supports law enforcement. Hard work will always pay off. Working hard so some lazy sap can mooch off you wont get the economy anywhere.
@nyctoo Furthermore, "From each according to his ability," there is no way to guage ability. I have a POS uncle that cried and cried and got on disability for his legs and back, and he fought a 4 wheeler with the money and rides it around everyday. In a perfect world it will work, but as long as there are ways to abuse it, people will..in mass.
@LeBaronDePropane No. I got student loans and used my credit card and paid/paying it off. That's why I have good credit now. It helps when you pay your bills on time and not an idiot with money. I think that's the reason why people like socialism and communism so much perhaps. People are so fucking stupid to take care of the things they need instead of BS that they want like ipods, xbox's and hdtv's...so the government has to step in and fucking feed them.
@nyctoo I'm not exactly understanding what you're saying... are you being sarcasting when saying "maybe people like socialism and communism so much"?
I mean you must be.
Communist society means utter minimalism and simplicity - the lifestyle chosen by many medieval monks. You can have no more than a house, food, clothing, artwork, and other people. It's prevents the obtaining of 'property' because not everyone can have property. If everyone can't have it, why do 1% of the population deserve it?
@LeBaronDePropane And that's impossible for most of the population. It's a human trait to be greedy. We are selfish-based animal crawling across the Earth, but because we have brains, sometimes we can try real hard and aspire to something that is less than pure evil. That's why it will never work. The lazy will always abuse the hard working. That is why capitalism works for the most part (With it's own flaws ofcourse), it at least puts human greed to work for productivity.
@bgd1968 The point of supplying the Mujahideen was that it was a defacto war against the Soviets, and when we supplied both the Iranians and Iraqis, it was to ensure instability in the region because if they were occupied fighting each other, they wouldn't worry about us or Israel.
The unfortunate result, however, is that these forces inevitably later turned our own weapons, training, and tactics against us because this approach works in the short term, but never in the long term.
@Funkywhiteboy63 The two are indellibly connected, though, so without WWII, there would've bene no need for that production. Keep in mind that we were approaching a wartime economy with our support of England before Pearl Harbor and our official declaration of war on the Axis Powers.
Germany was the first country to come out of the Depression via their pre-wartime production and preparation programs because everyone had a job to do, and everything was geared toward the coming conflict.
The countries best economic times were (I beleive) The 40's, 50's, and 80's. In the 40's it was because of WWII, but just coincidentally, the 50's and 80's both had conservative presidents, Eisenhower and Reagan respectivly. Coincidence? I think not.
@SpadaccinoLuciano I know you would like to think it was but the country was never prosperous under Conservative presidents. FDR and massive government spending (jobs created from the war), and Clinton ofcourse had the best economies.
@1polymath That is simply not true. FDR presided over some of the worst economic times in this country's history - have you ever heard of the Great Depression? It was barely a recession - AND it was getting better before he started to "help" with his big government programs. Also, if you look at the "Clinton" jobs record, a VERY large % of them came from companies that got their start because of REAGAN's economic policies.
@ToddAldrich You need to read your history! I'm going to pretend that you said the Great Depression wasn't that bad and that the economy got better by chance and osmosis and not by Democractic policies! Your presidents made America into a global Fascist state! When the government start putting ppl in camps your going to pray for a real democracy again!
@1polymath I do not need to RE-Study history. I have not stopped studying it for over 30 years. After the 1929 crash, unemployment skyrocketed to 9% but by June of 1930, it had already come down to 6%. The recession was OVER. THEN Hoover undertook a massive tax increase and set up all sorts of government programs to "help" people. The architects of the "New Deal" admitted that they stole pretty much everything from Hoovers inititiatives. The result was a DECADE long Depression.
Fed up with jerks ambushing videos they dont like, spewing hatred, and foul mouthed nonsense. People who have no respect for them selves or anyone else, demonstrate that they are fools......... But...... ...Ronald Reagan, was a class act, & man of character, principle, values, faith. He had respect for all men, even those who were insulting, & evil, but he wouldnt condone that behavior & stood up to it. God bless him for that. and, God forgive the rest of you for your foolishness. (=o)
Part of the hagiography of St. Ronald Reagan. This is is taking his words out of context and using it to promote bigotry. The overdramatic choral music adds to the myth making. You sycophants are endlessly annoying.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He was the best president ever. We have him,but nobody want to head him even the republicans they have forgotten,what he means to be....................We are one and the same America is one It don't matters if is northjsouth or west and east,We are one and the same......
... a foundation of cowardice: fear of people with colors, religions, cultures and sex lives that differ from your own; fear of reform in banking, health care, energy; fantasy fears of America being transformed into an Islamic nation, into social/commun/fasc-ism, into a disarmed populace put in internment camps; and more. ... “An open letter to conservatives” tpmcafe talkingpointsmemo
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@hackit12 If the Japanese people resisted continued mass immigration of Christian "Fundamentalists" waving American flags, hating Japanese culture etc to their country out of purely economical reasons, if the Japanese people made that choice for their nation, culture and people, to not want that for their country (which would be their right, to make such a decision no?) would you call them names? call them racist, christiano phobic etc? Racist? Not America no but Europe is being lost to Islam
But, conning others – with –‘irresponsible and irrational fear’-;
promoting and celebrating prejudice and hatred
[cowardice: fear of people with colors, religions, cultures, fantasy fears, etc.].
Is beyond being rational, civil or legal ! Beck/O’Reilly/etc. inciting murder ... ?
-
If you’re going to regain stature as rational, responsible people, gonna have to start by draining the swamp of: hypocrisy, hyperbole, re-writing history and hate ...
A calm, responsible, grownup agenda ... getting tired of the childish B.S.
-
The extremely wealthy are –‘funding/promoting this divisiveness’- [same as they did SINCE the 1950’s] with some of the –‘identical false rhetoric’-; and are still laughing all the way to the bank !
-
Kochs, Scaife, Coors, Forbes, ETC – Defending their inherited money
-'as hard working AmeriKans
...'- lobbying and BUYING [tax and corp. preference] and propaganda is not hard OR MORAL !
@NOBS4321 ah class warfare.getting pretty tired of the same old bullshit.if you can not become successful in america you will not be successful anywhere.
Nope. I'm afraid not. America has become a nation of neocon fucks who worship a superhero that never was. Ronald Reagan never won a war in his life. And we have not won a war in this great United States since Desert Storm. And before that, World War 2.
Ronald Reagan transformed this country into a tepid nation of spendthrifts and fools. Ronald Reagan is one of the men responsible for the degradation of this country, and god damn it do I hate him. And you.
@Redfingers Ha ha ha sure... Ronald Reagan did better than not win a war. He didn't fight one. He used a strategy that showed superior fire power and broke the backs of our enemies economically. He saved millions of lives. AND on top of that, 30 years later is still loved. You and the pathetic snivelling cowards who think like you never would have dared face an entire country full of people that would supported him in the 80s.
And in doing so broke the revenue streams of the United States government and contributed the largest increase in defense spending of any contemporary president? You do realize that the military budget of the United States exceeds the spending of the rest of the world combined? And we haven't been invaded by a foreign power since 1941.
The collapse, the rot of an empire is from within. Ronald Reagan showed that the Soviets overspent on defense and collapsed.
@Redfingers And just to show you how stupid you are, most of Reagan's increased defense spending was ON those Nuclear missiles that you claim are the ONLY reason a country would not invade us. So I guess YOU DO credit Reagan for keeping us from being invaded.
The TRUTH however is both are part of the equation.
Overspending on conventional arms when a modest nuclear arsenal is a sufficient deterrent....sufficient for the Cold War....is not an effective strategy.
The only thing it is effective at is creating a gigantic budget deficit, which is more what Reagan was responsible for than any military strategy in his non-military career.
Standing armies for the most part in peacetime are an enormous burden. We spend half the world's budget on defense, which is nonsense.
@Redfingers The military is one of the FEW Constitutional roles of government. Reagan's build up led to the "peace dividend" that allowed Clinton to claim he balanced the budget. Standing armies are needed and necessary. ESPECIALLY to ward off an invasion. What are we going to do, nuke our own cities when the enemy lands in Los Angeles? You display an ASTOUNDING amount of ignorance.
Did you know that we spend $20 billion on air conditioning the troops in Iraq? That's more than the entire budget for NASA.
I'm not saying we should liquidate the conventional arms defense budget, but I am saying that we are overspending on "defense" to the point of it becoming comically unsustainable. The Soviets were doing EXACTLY the same thing Reagan did, spending shit tons of money on conventional arms research and production, at the expense of the rest of the economy.
@lionel21000 unpopular speech often becomes popular speech.....keep this in mind once you receive a real education on the exploits of Reagan.....look at his policies and the consequences they have had on today's USA.....I am not even american and I know for a fact that Reagan was merely a puppet figure who pushed corporate interests
@Redfingers LOL Fa sho! Conservatives live in a fucking bubble and hardworking Americans have to pay the price of their corporatization of government!
@1polymath The corporatization of our government is due to the LIBERALS. Conservatives don't want government to have that power to begin with. Liberals favor regulations that keep small businesses from competing with big corporations. Liberals favor group "rights" over individual liberty.
@Redfingers dont tell me you think the empty suited chicago con man is your kinda guy? and no wonder our country is so fucked up..are you yet ANOTHER fine product of public schools? save it idiot
Ronald Reagan acted through 8 years of being President. Told what to say most times- another acting gig for the gipper. Look at his style, head just right, empahsis on the right word! The man who played President.
Cerl84 1 week ago
@Cerl84 How right you are. The strength of President Reagan's administration is the way he ran it like a business. Got the best and the brightest minds together, and brought us out of the malaise darkness of the Carter administration. Reagan knew that one person alone is not as strong as a team.
Indeed a great presider over our nation, not an authoritarian like we have now. We in 2012 are now lead by the weakest administration yet, filled with misfits and marxists...Obamas buddies.
Askerban 3 days ago in playlist Speeches
I am very happy to see the vidoe Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
Melehete 3 weeks ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today
Ondelendo 3 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today, I wish success always
bebeheuy 3 weeks ago
Nice Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today From Your
imegatrone 3 weeks ago
Your Video Ronald Reagan's famous speech "A Time for Choosing" placed in the context of Islamic fascism, which the world is dealing with today Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
nickmarin10 1 month ago
Reagan, deserves more respect then is!
This video is pathetic and his no reason
1awareness 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama Increased National Debt More in 4 Days Than Truman and Eisenhower Did in 10 Years! Last week the Obama administration reportedly increased the national debt (in inflation-adjusted dollars) more in a mere four days than the administrations of Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower increased it from 1950-1960 — an entire decade.
footstomp1 2 months ago
Great words to live by!
hoopnet892 2 months ago
Please I would like to know the song played in the clip
Joann76212 3 months ago
@Joann76212
The Music is "Absolute Truth" by Debbie Wiseman, it was written as the soundtrack for a BBC documentary.
hkdave67 2 months ago
@FranklyMisterShankly Not to mention that the Soviets didn't 'invade' Afghanistan but had been begged by the socialist government of Afghanistan to send troops to help stamp out a radical Islamic insurgency. The fundamentalist Muslims were angry because the socialist government was sending women to school and banning the veil. The response of the Islamic fundies to female education? Bombing schools and acid attacks. If you think backwards Islamic fundies were the heroes I don't know why.
schueaj 3 months ago
@djflargo Is Obama a Marxist-Leninist, Trotskyist, or Maoist? I support Leninist ideas but I don't think the US has a large enough rural/peasant population for Maoism to be applicable. I've never really read any of Obama's Marxist writings so I've got to remember to look those up.
schueaj 3 months ago
What is the name of the song
Joann76212 3 months ago
Three remarkable women who, following the deaths of their husbands, helped enhance the enormous veneration of their spouses' memories are Nancy Reagan, Jacqueline Kennedy and Coretta Scott King. Without the presence and dignity of these three widows at their husbands' funerals and beyond, I doubt that we would have seen such an immediate acceptance of their husbands in America's national pantheon of heroes.
phoenixbornagain 3 months ago
What are the odds...? Have you seen this reported anywhere other than alternative media? Have you seen it in the Drive-Bys or the State-Controlled Media?
footstomp1 3 months ago
It was a state teacher or state job of some kind. It was not a private sector job. Even at that: $278,000 per job. So they admit up front. Now, they have to do this. You wonder, "Well, why would they admit this?"
They do it on a Friday, Fourth of July weekend when nobody's paying any attention.
footstomp1 3 months ago
ladies and gentlemen, the regime on Friday made a document dump. The Obama regime admitted that the stimulus didn't accomplish anything. They admitted that every job created by the stimulus cost about $278,000, and let's remember that every job created by the stimulus was a government job.
footstomp1 3 months ago
Ronald Reagan is an American hero, as evidenced by the enormous national outpouring of affection and respect that accompanied his death.
phoenixbornagain 3 months ago
Without the presence and dignity of these three widows at their husbands' funerals and beyond, I doubt that we would have seen such an immediate acceptance of their husbands in America's national pantheon of heroes.
phoenixbornagain 4 months ago
Comment removed
phoenixbornagain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
War solved nothing...except end slavery, fascism, Nazism, and Communism...but other than that war has never settled anything...well, except birth the freest nation on earth in the American Revolution from Britain...but besides that war is always bad...except Pope Urban in 1099 A.D. FINALLY decided that Europe needed to defend itself from the Global Islamic Jihad that was unleashed in 632 A.D., but besides that...war is always wrong...
John76Adams 4 months ago
@John76Adams Well said sir,..
blitzkreig052777 4 months ago
peace at all costs is slavery.. Auschwitz is the end result in compliance to tyranny. IT seamed peaceful all the time while the ovens burned. "Work will set you free" is what their sign said. No one was set free. There are times you have to stand against tyranny or die in oppression.
bfrance2002 4 months ago
@bfrance2002 So true friend. Live free or die is not just a statement it is a fact.
phoenixbornagain 4 months ago 12
Reagan did it
youtube.com/watch?v=ev18pwAI6Nw&feature=related
TheMidnightdrunk 4 months ago
War does not decide who is right, but who is left.
There is a religion that preaches that all those oppose it are to die, and those who take on this mission, to carry it out will get the greatest glory on the other side, no matter how many innocent lives are taken in the process. So how do you deal with someone who is ready and willing to die to kill you, even if they have to take out a building full of children to do it.
Maples01 4 months ago
I love this guy so much, view this link--> /watch?v=y3f9mlUQzJA
born912 4 months ago
Ronald Regan was the greatest president in USA history. Obama (the MARXIST was the worst)
djflargo 4 months ago 25
@djflargo Amen!
phoenixbornagain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djflargo Yeah, if only Obama would raise taxes the way Reagan did, he'd be so much better.
eirefrance 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djflargo Yeah, if only Obama would raise taxes the way Reagan did, he'd be so much better.
eirefrance 4 months ago
@djflargo You really don't have a clue what a marxist is do you?
The worst US president by the way was Warren G Harding who appointed the Ohio Gang to cabinet posts who embezzled from the government, had 4 mistresses while in office and was rumored to have been a member of the Klu Klux Klan & was involved in the Teapot Dome Affair.
James Buchanan is the second worst. Under his watch 7 states succeeded from the union, the economy tanked and the civil war started.
rrtodd95 3 months ago
@djflargo Your a moron.
skiingman97 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
... ideologically driven legend-manufacturing ... myth machine ...
***
... but this nation has arguably never seen the kind of bold, crudely calculated and ideologically driven legend-manufacturing as has taken place with Ronald Reagan.
... It is a myth machine ... – “for misguided policies .... lowering taxes in the time of war” ....
“Tear Down This Myth: How Reagan's Legacy Haunts Our Future”, - By Will Bunch
XEBKWTR 4 months ago
Egalitarianism, the idea that merit should be totally removed from our economics, or that productiveness as judged by your own customers is not the most important economic merit, is its own evil. I don't care if takes the form of "right" or "left" socialism, whatever the hell that distinction is supposed to refer to. I will take "every man for himself" over "every man for every man but himself" anyday.
eggory 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mental, Nah, not so. You have fallen for a big LIE. Read "The Twisted Cross" by Joe Carr. Hitler and the Nazis were National SOCIALISTS, a variant of SOCIALISM, which IS Left-Wing. The reason Liberals and Progressives LIE about Nazism and FALSELY say it is "Left-Wing" is to distance themselves from Hitler. For more ACTUAL FACTS/HISTORY see: "The Aquarian Conspiracy" by Marilyn Ferguson and "The Hidden dangers of The Rainbow" by Constance Cumby.
John76Adams 4 months ago
Reagan was an idiot. He supported the Taliban and now they are fighting us.
KhmerD0g 4 months ago
@KhmerD0g /watch?v=y3f9mlUQzJA
born912 4 months ago
@KhmerD0g Reagan was smart, he got the Taliban to fight the Soviet Union, so we didn't have too! No different than FDR getting the Soviets on our side during WW2 to help defeat Germany!
JENDALL714 4 months ago
@JENDALL714
Nonsense. The Taliban was fighting invaders and an occupation force--Soviet Union. American just gave the Taliban monies and weapons. Even if there were no American's helps, the Taliban still fight the Soviet on their own. Besides, the Taliban got help from Saudi Arabia, Iran (yes them too), Pakistan and many other Islamic countries who contribute monies, arms and other supplies.
KhmerD0g 4 months ago
@KhmerD0g For fucks sake, how many times do I have to post this?
The TALIBAN DID NOT EXIST BEFORE 1992! The MUJAHEDDIN AND THE TALIBAN ARE TWO DIFFERENT BODIES!
theredraven 4 months ago in playlist theredraven's Favorited Videos
@JENDALL714 learn the history of world war 2 will you , Winston Churchill reached out to josef dughashvilli and allied Britain with soviet russia to defeat hitler and nazi germany NOT fdr!
SocratesTheGadfly 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fascism/Nazism IS National SOCIALISM. ALL Socialism IS Leftist/Liberal.
This is not 1713...we use terms and definitions as used today. Nor should we use terms and definitions as set be Leftists. Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, FDR, LBJ, Clinton, ObaMarxist have their view and definition of Fascism, Left-Wing and Conservatism, Right-Wing...I refuse to let Socialist, Left-Wing TYRANTS set the terms and definitions I use, I refuse to let Liberals/Leftists set the ROE.
John76Adams 4 months ago
@John76Adams Except National Socialism isn't socialism, it's fascism a system diametrically opposed to socialism, & not all socialism is left nor liberal. There is a reason the terms left & right socialism exist, there is a reason the term authoritarian socialism exists. This is 2011 when the right feels the need to redefine terms for the sake of painting the rightwing in a good light, not caring that all they are doing is making communication more difficult.
Fuctmentality 4 months ago
@John76Adams Excellent post! Right on mark. I would like to help you clear the liberal hate speech from this board. Check back often
phoenixbornagain 4 months ago
lets go all the way it is time for us to win. Vice President Howard Taylor and the team will do it .228 369 9612.
MegaSuzisuzi 4 months ago
Comment removed
Queet4321 4 months ago
Comment removed
SociaInequity 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quit ostriching about Islam and fly with the eagles. See my profile for urls.
historyscoper 5 months ago
@the reddog223,
You are sooo WRONG. Nazism=National SOCIALISM!!! Nazism & Fascism are LEFTIST. Islam IS LEFTIST in that they too are a TYRANNY. And even The Marxist-Stalinist Soviet Union had its "gods"- all the pictures and statues of Lenin and Stalin. Commie China had/has it's adoration of Mao.
John76Adams 5 months ago
Comment removed
SociaInequity 5 months ago
14 points of fascism - Dr. Lawrence Britt
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
4. Supremacy of the Military
5. Rampant Sexism
6. Controlled Mass Media
.....
SociaInequity 5 months ago
.....
7. Obsession with National Security
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
9. Corporate Power is Protected
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
14. Fraudulent Elections
SociaInequity 5 months ago
SOURCE
Dr. Laurence Britt, a political scientist. Dr. Britt studied the fascist
regimes of: Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain),
Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile).
SociaInequity 4 months ago
fascism :
right-wing nationalist ideology or movement, often racist;
with an authoritarian and hierarchical structure,
forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism,
that is fundamentally opposed to democracy and liberalism.
= Corporate-Govt.
[bought right-wing politicians, gaining corporates (socialistic)
subsidies and taxation preferences for the ruling wealthy class].
SociaInequity 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TALIBAN –‘one religion’s fanaticism’- legislated against the majority -
... pro-death penalty, anti-drug, anti-gay, anti-abortion, etc. –
.
– who does that resemble ?? -USA Republicans. !
ellipsis4321 5 months ago
so enjoy the great things our savior" coke head, street activist" king obama has given you.
hey stupid what ya got
simple ass clown90 yes 90 rounds of golf 7 vacations.......oh yes dont forget his mantra i will not rest till more americans have jobs...............lol....blow here bootlips
stewart11590 5 months ago
Ronald Reagan my ass
S0METHING1986 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PT2 That's in the works. Christians and Jews 1st. Islam wants them both gone. Godless ubers and Socialist/Athiests want all those gods to go, but, they'll except these tyrannal religiods. they'll soon selfdistruct. WE WIN!
BarJabba 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PT1 Islam is liken to many tyannical idealogies. In fact, maybe they have come to some agreement with Comunist Russia during/after thier "war." Now the deal is in and Islamo is born & compete for power on the same Chessboard as the "those in power" of the world. I probably not so far afield on that one. It saddens me to see the use of endless wars to try & reduce the worlds population. Now, they'll have to come up with a much faster way to get a genesideal number to human population. CONT>>
BarJabba 5 months ago
Taliban legislated –‘one religion’s fanaticism’- against the majority:..
pro-death penalty, anti-drug, anti-gay, anti-abortion, etc.
= Repub./consrv. - politicians/media whores/relig-hypocrites
And claim they do not legislate morality
– do not, do ‘-social engineering’- !!!
=
American Taliban Engineering ....
DemoCrazy54321 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
YAY MISTER REAGAN! a lot of people dislike him but they can frankly go fuck themselves b/c he ended decades of possible nuclear conflict, and though he may have supplied alqueda but shit thats better than having a nuclear capable ussr bent on destroying capatilist nations, but on the other hand we were ready to do the same to them... pardon my language.
MarineMike97 5 months ago
Comment removed
duncanscott4 5 months ago
as much as you warmongers want to believe, war is NOT peace. Please get that through your Orwellian brains. Plus, Reagan was not even talking about terrorism which is a direct consequence of our foreign policy of interventionism of the past 60 years.
EdMan2012 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
“I liked Reagan’s speeches ... so let’s keep fuc___-up the country”
DemoCrazy54321 5 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
TALIBAN –‘one religion’s fanaticism’- legislated against the majority -
... pro-death penalty, anti-drug, anti-gay, anti-abortion, etc. –
– who does that resemble ??
-
USA Republicans. !
... as hypocritical, emotional wedge issues ... - spun by Repub. politicians/media whores/relig-hypocrites..
ellipsis4321 5 months ago
Comment removed
Trickle4321 5 months ago
...
Ironically, - the same hYpocrites are using -'anti-sharia fear-factoring'- [red herring] to rile up their low-IQ - sheeple... ? “ do not want their type of law here ” ...
– which - we already have ! ___ Under the guise of being –‘more moral’- [than the non-God-fearing] - spun by Repub. politicians/media whores/relig-hypocrites..
ellipsis4321 5 months ago
yeah, because Reagan did such a wonderful job with Iran, Iraq, and Bin Laden.
CommonSense8102 5 months ago 3
Ronald Reagan learned everything he knew about politics from a trained chimp named Bonzo.
Soulvigilante 5 months ago 3
@Soulvigilante guess we could say something nasty bout you too but we don't. islam isn't just a religion , it's also a political system,which makes it even more dangerous. leave the personal attacks off line.
wjkolka 4 months ago
@wjkolka I couldn't agree more that any religion that becomes also a political system is dangerous. I mean, imagine a country where zealotous religious doctrine dictates social policy; where the rights of, say, women and persons of alternative lifestyles are eschewed in favor of quasi-righteous politico-theological posturing...
Soulvigilante 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL S 4 S YA'LL
JUANO510 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Fastest way to peace, is to surrender."
12dollarsand78cents 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you for your visit. The existence of my blog depends of you. Please, click on advertisements. Blessings. *** ronaldreagan2012.blogspot.com***
emiaramburu 6 months ago
stop with the hate, look for the inspiration. or we're all doomed
ajlee35 6 months ago
>Islamic Fascism
>Islam is a form of Judaism, and an advanced form of Christianity
>Also, might i add that Ronald Reagan supported the far-right Muslim fundamentalists?
LeBaronDePropane 6 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Fascism is leftism
thereddog223 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thereddog223
LOL! Fascism is putting the needs of one specific group above the needs of the whole country! Maybe you should open up a dictionary for once in your life. Example: What Republicans do to Oil Companies; what the Nazis did to the Aryans. That's Fascism.
Absolute leftist society would include no religion whatsoever, which contradicts your claim that "islam is fascism, and fascism is leftism"
Obviously your IQ is below 90.
LeBaronDePropane 6 months ago 6
It had nothing to do with oil and oil is not upper cased in that context but your the genius
thereddog223 6 months ago
@thereddog223
Wait, nothing to do with oil?
We're in the Middle East, and it's not because of our need for oil?
Operation "Just 'Cause" NOTHING TO DO WITH OIL?
>Oil corporation becomes globalized
>world economy relies on oil exchange
>thousands of oil companies
>Republicans decide that oil is so necessary, they make the top 5 oil companies exempt from taxes and invade other countries for their benefit
>all other third-party oil companies must struggle to make a living
the needs of the few.
LeBaronDePropane 6 months ago
If it was about oil we have oil in the US we could drill here
thereddog223 6 months ago
@thereddog223 LOL! War profits ALL privatized corporations, not just oil companies, do you know what Blackwater Worldwide is? Private military group, owned by a buddy of Dubya's.
War is about increasing profits for the big companies, why don't you see that?
And there's oil in the US, but not as much as there is in other countries.
The Bush Administration probably found it easier to convince people to invade another country than it was to persuade them to drill here.
LeBaronDePropane 6 months ago
There is a lot more in the US then anywhere except Canada
thereddog223 6 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane If he's just a buddy of dubbya's why is it obama still uses blackwater? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
daPlumber702 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They are not exempt from taxes but keep making a fool of your self
thereddog223 6 months ago
@thereddog223 I'm sorry, not exempt, but they do get a huge tax break.
Btw, why do you keep focusing on only one single statement i make?
You'll pay attention to one thing that you know something (but very little about) and just pass over the keywords that make you uncomfortable.
Have you still not looked up fascism in the dictionary? You truly know how to debate! Yes point out that i'm making a fool of myself so i stop making you look like a retard, LOL!
LeBaronDePropane 6 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane Do you have any idea how many people in america pay no taxes at all? I can guarantee you that those NOT paying taxes certainly aren't rich.
Can you not fail at some point. I've read about 10 comments from you and each is more illogical than the last.
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@daPlumber702
So, 10,000 homeless people not paying taxes is more detrimental than 1 billionare not paying taxes? 10,000 homeless people can't pay taxes. It's not like they're taking advantage of the system...
Logic is relative my friend, see your logic consists of selfishness, greed, and material advantage.
My logic isn't.
Oh btw, point out how i'm "illogical" and i'll correct my "inferior mindset" of social responsibility.
Don't bother responding if you're not going to address all subjects.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
Comment removed
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane Yes 10,000 not working or having somewhere to live would be more detrimental than 1 200,000-aire (we're talking 200,000 here based on what the obama crew has said, not billion get something right please) paying HALF of what he/she made because of those not paying taxes. but not by much. And if you think that everyone not paying taxes is homeless your a twit. Go look up "US Government assistance programs". Then look up "State assistance Programs in america" Look into...
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane how many people in this country every year live better than most people in the freaking world because half of the country pays their damned taxes.
Logic is not relative you moron. Logic is fucking factual.
You can't get simple facts correct. look up the number of actual homeless in this country, then look up the number of people that pay $0 in taxes then look up the number of people making over 200,000 a year then we can start to talk about this shit. til then bmad
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@daPlumber702
If you ask me, i've noticed in my area (New Jersey) most homeless people, when asked to come into a homeless shelter, refuse, even in 10 degree weather. I think it's a pride thing, and they don't want to be around other homeless people. A large portion of them are homeless due to Reagan's closing of mental hospitals in the 80's.
Logic: Noun; Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. Principles is the key word.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago 2
@LeBaronDePropane you're a fucking idiot. That is all.
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@daPlumber702 You're clearly not mature. You either have no real world experience, haven't opened a dictionary, and you like to be fed your 'facts'. OR you're just arrogant.
But it's okay to have experience in politics or humanity if you're under the age of 12. I mean, children are innocent, right? You don't need to dirty yourself with the corruption and lies of American politics until you're at LEAST 14.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane I've had enough of complete tools like you that feel the only way to live life is to incorporate yourself into some type of borg structure and crush anyone that doesn't have the same numbers you do. You try to use false logic and brainless tactics to get a point across that is nothing but thievery. Fail elsewhere fuckwad.
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@daPlumber702 No, were you? Do you have an impediment that prevents you from helping those in need, or from even reading books? I don't necessarily care about the methods brought about by improving social equality, just the end goal. If Ronald Reagan was truly out to save the poor and those who are incapable of working, then i would've liked him more. But that's proven wrong, refer to his closing of mental hospitals and causing thousands of mentally challenged people to live on the street.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago 2
@LeBaronDePropane I don't necessarily care about the methods brought about by improving social equality, just the end goal - therein lies your major malfunction numb nuts.
You should look up all the facts on that mental hospital shtuff you keep throwing around like it proves your point. You know, like how he allowed Private mental hospitals to open by closing the government funded ones, private facilities that greatly improve the quality of life compared to their public counterparts.
daPlumber702 5 months ago
@daPlumber702
A vast majority of homeless people expelled from hospitals in the 80's are still homeless. Privatizing mental hospitals is making it a FOR PROFIT BUSINESS. How can you not see this? For example jails, they're owned by a group of people, and are given money by the state to feed the inmates. The jails then buy $2 for 12 pack ramen noddles, feed that to the inmates, and keep all of the real money for themselves! Private hospitals that can give lobotomies without regulation, cool!
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane Socialism will always lead to fascism.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo >Socialism will always lead to fascism
Okay, so the Iroquois League went from pre-dated (and successful) Communism, straight into Fascism? HAHAHA!
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane It worked because it wasn't communism, or even socialism. It was large group of loosely governed tribes. Plus they didn't have enough time to evolve. With the amount of information and corruption that can spread so rapidly in modern times, it is best to keep government small, before it gets too big to oppress the people.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo
Less evolved?
LOOSELY GOVERNED?!
The Iroquois League was an enormous Commonwealth that consisted of representatives from each tribe in the League. The Iroquois Nation had one specific language and currency, and no matter how much an individual worked in a day, they would still share in the bounty of their local community. That is the ideal government (pre-dated, non-industrial Communism). You are nothing more than a disrespectful pig spitting on the graves of the innocent and pure.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane Yes, less evolved to modern standards, obviously. I stated my point above. And exactly. Tribes. We don't have tribes consisting of a small group of the population. Get over it bro. Communism/hardline socialism is and will be dead. It doesn't work because of human greed and utter lack of incentive. In a perfect world, sure it could work...but it isn't. At least capitalism makes use of human greed and uses it towards advancement and competition.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo
Capitalist system: the minimum wage worker can't afford a new car, TV, or to move his home whenever he pleases.
Communist system: EXACTLY THE SAME
Communism doesn't take the property of the working man BECAUSE HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY TO BEGIN WITH.
The only difference is that with Capitalism, there's always that carrot in front of you saying "You could be a millionaire someday in the land of opportunity!" But it's nothing more than a lie. If you are born a peasant, you'll die a peasant.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane That isn't true at all. My mother for example was born in a not so wealthy family, and she has worked very hard and makes a very good living now. So i guess that throws your theory out of the window.
If you are good at something, you invest the hard work, and be genuine, it will pay off eventually.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo
Here's a scenario. I'm born to a family (today) of 6 children and my father abandoned me. We live in a 2 bedroom apartment, so we all have to share a bed. If it's hard to get a job in the modern economy, imagine competing against 5 siblings! Then i'll never go to college, because my mother can't pay for college for all of us. Result: minimum wage for the rest of me and my siblings lives.
Your mother did it 20+ years ago? The times, they are a changin'!
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane My mom has 3 siblings and her dad died after the last one was born. They had a small house. She studied and got a scholarship, went to college and is now a network engineer at a federally funded agency which supports law enforcement. Hard work will always pay off. Working hard so some lazy sap can mooch off you wont get the economy anywhere.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo Furthermore, "From each according to his ability," there is no way to guage ability. I have a POS uncle that cried and cried and got on disability for his legs and back, and he fought a 4 wheeler with the money and rides it around everyday. In a perfect world it will work, but as long as there are ways to abuse it, people will..in mass.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo
>scholarship
they're not going to give out a scholarship to everyone who works hard. "Money flows to us, not from us" That's the business motto of every american.
Your parents probably have paid/are going to pay for your college you hypocrite. You can't pay for college on a minimum wage job, no matter what.
Did your aunts/uncles get scholarships as well? The answer is probably no.
I work minimum wage 7 hours a day, don't you dare claim that i'm "mooching" you capitalist pig.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane No. I got student loans and used my credit card and paid/paying it off. That's why I have good credit now. It helps when you pay your bills on time and not an idiot with money. I think that's the reason why people like socialism and communism so much perhaps. People are so fucking stupid to take care of the things they need instead of BS that they want like ipods, xbox's and hdtv's...so the government has to step in and fucking feed them.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo I'm not exactly understanding what you're saying... are you being sarcasting when saying "maybe people like socialism and communism so much"?
I mean you must be.
Communist society means utter minimalism and simplicity - the lifestyle chosen by many medieval monks. You can have no more than a house, food, clothing, artwork, and other people. It's prevents the obtaining of 'property' because not everyone can have property. If everyone can't have it, why do 1% of the population deserve it?
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane And that's impossible for most of the population. It's a human trait to be greedy. We are selfish-based animal crawling across the Earth, but because we have brains, sometimes we can try real hard and aspire to something that is less than pure evil. That's why it will never work. The lazy will always abuse the hard working. That is why capitalism works for the most part (With it's own flaws ofcourse), it at least puts human greed to work for productivity.
nyctoo 5 months ago
@nyctoo Semen stains the mountain tops. You had better come to terms with the New World Order.
LeBaronDePropane 5 months ago
@LeBaronDePropane O.....k.............?
nyctoo 5 months ago
4 more years!
strongman17 6 months ago
He is needed now more then ever!
xbigxdummyx 6 months ago
Best way to deal with Islamic fascists is to make secret deals with them, if we follow Reagan's actions rather than empty rhetoric.
bgd1968 7 months ago
@bgd1968 The point of supplying the Mujahideen was that it was a defacto war against the Soviets, and when we supplied both the Iranians and Iraqis, it was to ensure instability in the region because if they were occupied fighting each other, they wouldn't worry about us or Israel.
The unfortunate result, however, is that these forces inevitably later turned our own weapons, training, and tactics against us because this approach works in the short term, but never in the long term.
moparmonster1965 6 months ago
@ ToddAldrich- To encapsulate your Depression comment,
"Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it".
Funkywhiteboy63 7 months ago
@Funkywhiteboy63 And unfortunately we ARE repeating those mistakes.
ToddAldrich 6 months ago
@ToddAldrich Sad but true, or so it would seem.
I'm with those who say that FDR's big-government New Deal programs aren't what lifted us
out of the Depression, WWII did. Cost a lot of lives, but wartime production was the key.
Funkywhiteboy63 6 months ago
@Funkywhiteboy63 The two are indellibly connected, though, so without WWII, there would've bene no need for that production. Keep in mind that we were approaching a wartime economy with our support of England before Pearl Harbor and our official declaration of war on the Axis Powers.
Germany was the first country to come out of the Depression via their pre-wartime production and preparation programs because everyone had a job to do, and everything was geared toward the coming conflict.
moparmonster1965 6 months ago
Fantastic video. GOD BLESS RONALD REAGAN, and GOD BLESS THIS GREAT NATION.
gartwilliams16 7 months ago 2
The countries best economic times were (I beleive) The 40's, 50's, and 80's. In the 40's it was because of WWII, but just coincidentally, the 50's and 80's both had conservative presidents, Eisenhower and Reagan respectivly. Coincidence? I think not.
SpadaccinoLuciano 7 months ago
@SpadaccinoLuciano I know you would like to think it was but the country was never prosperous under Conservative presidents. FDR and massive government spending (jobs created from the war), and Clinton ofcourse had the best economies.
1polymath 7 months ago
@1polymath That is simply not true. FDR presided over some of the worst economic times in this country's history - have you ever heard of the Great Depression? It was barely a recession - AND it was getting better before he started to "help" with his big government programs. Also, if you look at the "Clinton" jobs record, a VERY large % of them came from companies that got their start because of REAGAN's economic policies.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich You need to read your history! I'm going to pretend that you said the Great Depression wasn't that bad and that the economy got better by chance and osmosis and not by Democractic policies! Your presidents made America into a global Fascist state! When the government start putting ppl in camps your going to pray for a real democracy again!
1polymath 7 months ago
@1polymath I do not need to RE-Study history. I have not stopped studying it for over 30 years. After the 1929 crash, unemployment skyrocketed to 9% but by June of 1930, it had already come down to 6%. The recession was OVER. THEN Hoover undertook a massive tax increase and set up all sorts of government programs to "help" people. The architects of the "New Deal" admitted that they stole pretty much everything from Hoovers inititiatives. The result was a DECADE long Depression.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."
- Benito Mussolini
hansjalv 7 months ago 3
@hansjalv the moron quotes mussolini and wants a thumbs up?.lol..another failed idiot..
wogdoggy 7 months ago
@wogdoggy I'm sure you know better than Benito Mussolini what fascism is.
hansjalv 7 months ago
@hansjalv And guess what Obama and other liberals have been doing for decades? (RINO's included).
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich The Barack Obama-regime is clearly fascist, as any honest observer must conclude.
hansjalv 7 months ago
@hansjalv Yes he is - but not a purist - he would tend more toward straight marxism if he could.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich Accepting Mussolinis definition of fascism, Obama is very clearly a fascist.
hansjalv 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fed up with jerks ambushing videos they dont like, spewing hatred, and foul mouthed nonsense. People who have no respect for them selves or anyone else, demonstrate that they are fools......... But...... ...Ronald Reagan, was a class act, & man of character, principle, values, faith. He had respect for all men, even those who were insulting, & evil, but he wouldnt condone that behavior & stood up to it. God bless him for that. and, God forgive the rest of you for your foolishness. (=o)
Col316Sing 7 months ago 2
should be called Lessons on How to defeat the Federal Government and the Police State
beEasy2011 8 months ago
Part of the hagiography of St. Ronald Reagan. This is is taking his words out of context and using it to promote bigotry. The overdramatic choral music adds to the myth making. You sycophants are endlessly annoying.
pfrocchi 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He was the best president ever. We have him,but nobody want to head him even the republicans they have forgotten,what he means to be....................We are one and the same America is one It don't matters if is northjsouth or west and east,We are one and the same......
celadon27 8 months ago
... a foundation of cowardice: fear of people with colors, religions, cultures and sex lives that differ from your own; fear of reform in banking, health care, energy; fantasy fears of America being transformed into an Islamic nation, into social/commun/fasc-ism, into a disarmed populace put in internment camps; and more. ... “An open letter to conservatives” tpmcafe talkingpointsmemo
hackit12 8 months ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@hackit12 If the Japanese people resisted continued mass immigration of Christian "Fundamentalists" waving American flags, hating Japanese culture etc to their country out of purely economical reasons, if the Japanese people made that choice for their nation, culture and people, to not want that for their country (which would be their right, to make such a decision no?) would you call them names? call them racist, christiano phobic etc? Racist? Not America no but Europe is being lost to Islam
ToiToiToiHerrKaleun 8 months ago
@ToiToiToiHerrKaleun “..Japanese people made that choice for their nation, culture and people..”
-
Irrelevant deceptive comparison ... on cultural/religious tolerance, legality, etc.
-
Have imposed –‘contemporary’- Christian concepts in US law ... –‘pushed them’- beyond logic and science ! Guilt based –‘thru misrepresentations ...’-
You sheeple may live on a –‘premise of fear and authoritarianism’- ... that is your right !
...
Cont
NOBS4321 8 months ago 7
...
But, conning others – with –‘irresponsible and irrational fear’-;
promoting and celebrating prejudice and hatred
[cowardice: fear of people with colors, religions, cultures, fantasy fears, etc.].
Is beyond being rational, civil or legal ! Beck/O’Reilly/etc. inciting murder ... ?
-
If you’re going to regain stature as rational, responsible people, gonna have to start by draining the swamp of: hypocrisy, hyperbole, re-writing history and hate ...
Cont
NOBS4321 8 months ago 6
A calm, responsible, grownup agenda ... getting tired of the childish B.S.
-
The extremely wealthy are –‘funding/promoting this divisiveness’- [same as they did SINCE the 1950’s] with some of the –‘identical false rhetoric’-; and are still laughing all the way to the bank !
-
Kochs, Scaife, Coors, Forbes, ETC – Defending their inherited money
-'as hard working AmeriKans
...'- lobbying and BUYING [tax and corp. preference] and propaganda is not hard OR MORAL !
-
NOBS4321 8 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@NOBS4321 ah class warfare.getting pretty tired of the same old bullshit.if you can not become successful in america you will not be successful anywhere.
cassidy99ful 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NOBS4321 hows that comparison irrelevant and deceptive? you gotta give me more than that. elaborate. explain.
ToiToiToiHerrKaleun 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hackit12
Nope. I'm afraid not. America has become a nation of neocon fucks who worship a superhero that never was. Ronald Reagan never won a war in his life. And we have not won a war in this great United States since Desert Storm. And before that, World War 2.
Ronald Reagan transformed this country into a tepid nation of spendthrifts and fools. Ronald Reagan is one of the men responsible for the degradation of this country, and god damn it do I hate him. And you.
Redfingers 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Redfingers Ha ha ha sure... Ronald Reagan did better than not win a war. He didn't fight one. He used a strategy that showed superior fire power and broke the backs of our enemies economically. He saved millions of lives. AND on top of that, 30 years later is still loved. You and the pathetic snivelling cowards who think like you never would have dared face an entire country full of people that would supported him in the 80s.
lionel21000 7 months ago
@lionel21000
And in doing so broke the revenue streams of the United States government and contributed the largest increase in defense spending of any contemporary president? You do realize that the military budget of the United States exceeds the spending of the rest of the world combined? And we haven't been invaded by a foreign power since 1941.
The collapse, the rot of an empire is from within. Ronald Reagan showed that the Soviets overspent on defense and collapsed.
Redfingers 7 months ago 2
@Redfingers Did you ever think that there might be a connection between our military's power and the fact that we haven't been invaded?
Of course not, that would require logic, and liberal and "logic" are an oxymoron.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich
North Korea hasn't been invaded since the Korean War, which the North Koreans initiated by invading South Korea.
Today we wouldn't think of invading North Korea....or Pakistan.
Why? Nuclear missiles.
Not your stupid billion dollar tanks and footsoldiers shooting billions of rounds of 5.56 at sand dunes in the middle of the desert.
Conventional arms never stopped war. Napoleon invaded Germany, Bismarck invaded France, Hitler invaded Russia, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.
Redfingers 7 months ago
@Redfingers Guess what, we HAVE invaded Pakistan. How do you think we got Bin Laden. Guess WHY they didn't retaliate?
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@Redfingers And just to show you how stupid you are, most of Reagan's increased defense spending was ON those Nuclear missiles that you claim are the ONLY reason a country would not invade us. So I guess YOU DO credit Reagan for keeping us from being invaded.
The TRUTH however is both are part of the equation.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich
Overspending on conventional arms when a modest nuclear arsenal is a sufficient deterrent....sufficient for the Cold War....is not an effective strategy.
The only thing it is effective at is creating a gigantic budget deficit, which is more what Reagan was responsible for than any military strategy in his non-military career.
Standing armies for the most part in peacetime are an enormous burden. We spend half the world's budget on defense, which is nonsense.
Redfingers 7 months ago 2
@Redfingers The military is one of the FEW Constitutional roles of government. Reagan's build up led to the "peace dividend" that allowed Clinton to claim he balanced the budget. Standing armies are needed and necessary. ESPECIALLY to ward off an invasion. What are we going to do, nuke our own cities when the enemy lands in Los Angeles? You display an ASTOUNDING amount of ignorance.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@ToddAldrich
Did you know that we spend $20 billion on air conditioning the troops in Iraq? That's more than the entire budget for NASA.
I'm not saying we should liquidate the conventional arms defense budget, but I am saying that we are overspending on "defense" to the point of it becoming comically unsustainable. The Soviets were doing EXACTLY the same thing Reagan did, spending shit tons of money on conventional arms research and production, at the expense of the rest of the economy.
Redfingers 7 months ago 3
@lionel21000 unpopular speech often becomes popular speech.....keep this in mind once you receive a real education on the exploits of Reagan.....look at his policies and the consequences they have had on today's USA.....I am not even american and I know for a fact that Reagan was merely a puppet figure who pushed corporate interests
jmintube 7 months ago
@jmintube u certainly arent an american u anti capitalist euro trash pos...dumbass fuck
wogdoggy 7 months ago
@Redfingers LOL Fa sho! Conservatives live in a fucking bubble and hardworking Americans have to pay the price of their corporatization of government!
1polymath 7 months ago
@1polymath The corporatization of our government is due to the LIBERALS. Conservatives don't want government to have that power to begin with. Liberals favor regulations that keep small businesses from competing with big corporations. Liberals favor group "rights" over individual liberty.
You need to wake up.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago
@Redfingers dont tell me you think the empty suited chicago con man is your kinda guy? and no wonder our country is so fucked up..are you yet ANOTHER fine product of public schools? save it idiot
wogdoggy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Redfingers Ignorant people, such as yourself, usually DO hate those who are more intelligent or successful than they themselves are.
ToddAldrich 7 months ago