Why Physicists Need the Large Hadron Collider

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER, which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 nd they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.

[sandustanBrasov]

SandustanBrasov

Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.

[sandustanBrasov]

• Sand ustanBrasov

Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.

[sandustanBrasov]

• SandustanBrasov

But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.

[sandustanBrasov]

SandustanBrasov

A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.

[oIBBEo]

Thanx for the upload, this shines light on lot of my questions about the subject

[11111andi]

they have not found wat is in the qarks yet no teknolohy too see soo deep hiet.try thinking higgs gives waight too qarkcs higs ensighd qarks.

[pipus4444]

the LHC has a possibility of creating new parallel dimension !

[flowewritharoma]

Because The Physicists has a theory that They think of enough amount .

[161803]

haha -- "proton on proton" that's kinky

[gatapia1]

That was really enjoyable. The speaker made this very complex subject very clear in a way that only a true expert can.

[TeleporterM11]

DID THEY PAY HIM FOR THIS CLASS OR WAS IT DETENTION, SOME SORT OF MENTAL TORTURE.

[TeleporterM11]

THIS IDIOT OF A PROFESSOR JUST TOLD THE WHOLE CLASS THAT THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE DIMENSIONS AND THEY ARE PLANNING TO TAP INTO THEM FOR FUN

[TeleporterM11]

GUYS BASED ON MY MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HE AND OTHERS ARE SAYING .YOU ARE ALL DEAD.IT WILL CAUSE ELECTROMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES IN THE EARTHS CORE AND KILL ALL NON PLANT LIFE ON THE PLANET. MASSIVE EARTHQUAKES WILL OCCUR AND THE BIRDS WILL FALL FROM THE SKY AND THEN ALL OTHER FORM OF NON PLANT LIFE.

[telephas1c]

@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. I think you might have a problem with your mind. You're completely incoherent. Maybe you should go talk to someone or something.

[telephas1c]

@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. By the way, you're completely incoherent, maybe you should think about why it is you believe these things and if you really are being honest with yourself.

[TeleporterM11]

THE MYST-MONSTERS ARE ON THE WAY-101-11

[DiabSoulBooker]

man this talk is amazing, but it keeps freezing on me like 20 minutes in. I've refreshed the page so many times but it keeps freezing.

[HarshColby]

Excellent.

[gawdchats]

Don't be a moron. Gravity is not a theory. The explanations for how gravity works are theories.

[splicedenergy]

A theory is called a theory to have realization that we learn more and more and more. So most theories including Einstien's and Newtons theories will evolve the principle will still be relevent. Therefore, that in mind we really should not consider any law. The flat Earth was law too, then what happened? lol. Classic how non-scientists think they know things.

[NoSz4]

This guy sucks at explaining physics.  Read a book you'll retain more.

[snt0]

awesome talk

where's that accent from?

[InHouseTrainingLol]

Creating the big bang

[InHouseTrainingLol]

My reason for the big bang is hundreds of thousands of billions of particals floating around in the fast void of space slowly moved closer each milenium and when they got a couple coliding with each other they created a magnetic field..more meleniums later They come closer to those particles closer and closer faster and faster and faster untill they all come to form a little ball of particles so condence with Trillions and trillions of them And then when the force became so great they exploded

[ChronoMobius]

@InHouseTrainingLol If that is the case, then the real question should be : Where all those hundreds of thousands of billions of particals came from?

[socrstreets]

@ChronoMobius

It would be unintelligible to answer that question considering that nothing is known of what happened during the big bang or if there was a before, what happened then. Because at the sort of density and heat of the big bang, physical laws that we know of including time would break down and what is left is some sort of quantum fluctuations, aka weird shit. On the other hand your question presupposes that "coming from something" is even intelligible in a state such as the big bang.

[ChronoMobius]

How is it "unintelligible" to ask where all the particles that eventually collided together at high speeds originally came from if they were from before the big bang? Part of any research is to ask questions. I have accepted that we don't understand what happend back then or how, but if nothing can create something, then why not fire up the LHC with nothing in it to see what happens?

[socrstreets]

@ChronoMobius

I said that it's unintelligible to answer your question since little is known of what happened before the big bang, and therefore assuming something caused those particles to be while time didn't even exist is unintelligible. Also where did you get this "particles colliding at high speeds." When did this happen? Nothing in physics is not the nothing you're thinking about, Absolute nothing makes no sense because you can't describe it in a way that it won't end up meaning something

[socrstreets]

@socrstreets

In physics empty space-time (rid of all real particles, radiation, etc.) is responsible for producing virtual particles, how is still largely unknown. Virtual particles then, "pop into existence" from basically physics definition of nothing. So if there is even an infinitesimally small area of space-time mass and energy, (our something) would be produced from virtual particles which is from.... Nothing! Lhc doesn't have to fire up with nothing.

[MrMackxl65]

@socrstreets:ghost photons Indeed!

[TeleporterM11]

@MrMackxl65 GHOST PHOTONS MY ASS, HE IS TALKING ABOUT ANOTHER UNEXPLORED DIMENSION. WHERE ANYTHING COULD BE WAITING FOR US

[obaeyens]

@ChronoMobius

You are assuming that vacuum is empty while in reality vacuum contains about 10^90 kg mass per cubic cm! This can actually be measured. Vacuum "appears" to be empty. Also realize that the mass in this universe is estimated between 10^55 - 10^63 kg only.

Google virtual particles, casmir effect, quantum vacuum

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

make a new universe

[anotherelvis]

He is a good speaker.

[rbolo29]

Ignore gravity at the sub atomic level? What is the strong nuclear force and gravitation one in the same force?  This would explain why it's so weak.

[1337jsac]

dater analysis

[byScrooby]

Many struggle to answer with scientific credibility key questions about God, the Universe and the Bible. But Higgs Boson or not, God is most definitely real. If you doubt it, read 'the attempted murder of God' - A critical book at a critical time, it reveals the secrets of science that comprehensively demolish the theory of Evolution and provides scientific proof for God - a scientific certainty kept hidden from the world that in this critical time in history can now be revealed.

[GuitarXdude]

Here something you should think about. How come Common sense itself contradicts "the word of God." Also, Why does the BIBLE CONTRADICT ITS SELF. and finally, why don't you shut the fuck up and go read your fucking scriptures.

[thezandi]

scientific claims do not pertain to the supernatural. you have no idea what you are talking about, and are spamming.

[MadMadamJess]

good lecture. the original Super Collider was here in Tejas...in Austin..which was gonna be at 40 TeV..the LHC is a measly 14 TeV..lame. Favorited.

xoxoxo

luv,

jessie

[pacificguitarist]

@MadMadamJess

yup..... but then the idea was dropped.

Oh America.....

[MadMadamJess]

I know....pisses me off..I would have been so dern excited to have such an amazing machine in my state. lol!

xoxoxo

luv,

jessie

[KaOssis]

Fuckin Nazi's, yet another Freemason fake Holy Grail scam to make big black hole's in the World's econemy!

[unemployedfreak]

Can someone explain how we know the mass of the Top quark is 170GeV yet we can't tell if the Higgs boson mass is greater than 115GeV until we collide particles at energies that have not yet been achieved? In other words: by that logic, wouldn't we still be searching for the Top quark too?

[unemployedfreak]

OK, I asked too soon. He answers this question near the end of the lecture. Sorry!

[KatieSpecks]

steff666; This video is real science, real experiments, real results. It is the polar opposite to your whacko Nassim Haramein's clueless pseudoscience.

[apvansel]

This guy should do National geographic.

He is clear so those with little experience can understand and he doesn't misrepresent and abuse the science.

[mdma24]

I wish I could become a Nuclear or Quantum physicist but I'm not smart enough for that :(

[shoshanq]

Yes you are, maybe you might have to work a bit harder, but you can do it. Never sell yourself short.

[hd26R601]

@mdma24 How do you know you arent? And even you are correct, there are endless other things that you ARE smart enough for, something that requires a DIFFERENT kind of smart. Some ppl are math wiz but suck at physics and vice verca-neither is "smarter", just smarter in specific fields. ;)

[perydwyn]

@mdma24

Dont sell yourself short. A bit of time and effort and you can be as smart as the guy giving this lecture.

[666steff666]

you dont get reality by sticking 6 non existant planes together

nasim haramein....... the truth

[MoringAfterStar]

what are you going on about?

[AquANeoNDreaM]

Ha Ha!! Thats funny!

[666steff666]

the base level of quantom theory (dimentions)

[beginner193]

my butt is the fastest smell particle in the world :D

[RedOnChrome]

this is amazing, this makes wanna become a physicist, but it hurts my brain...

[verycleanteeth]

@ 16:00

Wonder what website they're browsing over on the bottom left.

[Nilguiri]

verycleanteeth

He's playing Frogger.

[mickch199]

thanks for posting

[F00dTube]

I meant to say classic physics rather than newtonian.

[zefvor]

attack of the anti-intellectuals ...

they lack the abilities to succeed in the intellectual field so they figure out that maybe going as far as possible in the opposite direction will bring them success

[paulma8]

antimatter is 100 times more powerful than the hydrogen bomb, the hydrogen bomb is 100 times more powerful than the uranium bomb, we all know what that bomb is capable of. Doesn't seem like the benefits of such experiment, overcome the risks.

[Leobons]

Your brain is melting. Stop trying to understand "quantum stuff"

[deusAtheismus]

Says stupid.

[museken]

I've gone 6 minutes into this video. The reason nothing these so called physicist works is because they lack experience with real life. They are statistical Analysis of numbers instead of reality. Granted they do have a procedure and a plan. The Large Hadron Collider failed and will fail because of lack of Chaos...Nothing ...Nothing can be controlled to a 100 percent certianty. There is always an outside factor . That factor is nature. Gravity does not exist check my posts for relevence.

[gillcorskey]

eh.?

[aznr4v3m4st3r]

Just because you can't understand them you assume their wrong? In case you haven't figured out yet, mathematics was created to explain the real world and so to work with numbers is to work with reality. Not only that, Many particle colliders have been created and used only before the LHC, which by the way exists in real life. Their doing experiments how do you call that not working with real life?

[soundbeans]

It's "they're" not "their".

[aznr4v3m4st3r]

thank you for the correction =)

[F00dTube]

museken: Physics is the science of nature, it can't get any more real life than that. Newtonian physics is the basis for all types of engineering, that would include civil engineering. Quantum physics is the basis for chemistry which is the basis for the petro-industry e.g. fuel, medicine; and bio-chemistry e.g. crop enhancement, insuline, the h1n1 vaccine that is currently being worked on. Also physicists will develop the power source of our future.

[canvas42]

Its not every day I bump into theoretial physicists and get to spend an hour plus listening to them describe Field Theory. But to hear the Director of MIT's Center for Theoretical Physics is truly what makes You tube great, and my life whole. Im not an MIT guy, but I feel like one.

Best wishes to everyone who follows people like Farhi. The real rockstars.

[Nwambe]

So you can repeat the Big Bang theory, can you? The Theory of Relativity? Heisenberg's Uncertainty Theory? You've got it flipped around - A law is an principle whose effects can be repeatedly proven through experiment. A theory is an idea that is borne out mathematically or through another method of proof, but for reasons of scale cannot be proven through experiment. How do you prove that observing an experiment changes its outcome, through experimentation?

[Bugstomper2]

Quantum Physics shows that just looking at an atom changes the electron shell's orbit, so obserrvation affects outcome in an experiment! Mind over matter! LOL

[keggerous]

thats because the interaction of the electron or photon or w/e u use, creates a quantum entangelment with the observation device. so the interaction of the electron with the matter that makes up the detector forces the wave funtion to collapse and the particle to have a position.

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

lol not

[keggerous]

u observe then not observe like in the double-slt experiment

[Nwambe]

Err... Gravity's a law because the experiment can be repeated - Law of gravity, not theory of gravity. You're thinking theory of relativity.

[rspawn]

"Err... Gravity's a law because the experiment can be repeated - Law of gravity, not theory of gravity. You're thinking theory of relativity."

Incorrect

In science a theory is only a theory if the experiment can be repeated.

The theory of relativity includes gravity; it is in a sense a theory of gravity. It has been proven over and over and there's no evidence against it.

GPS would not be as accurate as it is if it would not take the theory of relativity into account.

[johnnyboypdq]

You all must remember that this is JUST A THEROY!

In other words, they cannot prove it.

They have not written this to tape because they cannot arrive at a solid conculsion to explain what it represents and the proof of what it has provided!

If they said it farted they would have to show a STINK! In theroy it doesn't smell therefore it does not exist! So they MUST create a theroy from mathmatical double speak, to demonstrate a reaction (in theroy) of what does not exist!

Spend More Money!

[yaerav]

Yap. Gravity is also, just a theory (hence "theory of gravity".

Which must mean it has not been proven. Now, do us all a favour, and prove how wrong the "theroy" is by stepping out of a 15th floor window, will you?

[MrMackxl65]

@yaerav: I bet you're refering to the graviton! ;-)

[Samgurney88]

@yaerav Don't know the context of what you're saying is, but if you are going to be derisive, get your facts right. Gravity is not a theory, it is a phenomena explained by theories. So yes, General Relativity is 'just a theory'. But if you insist strictly upon direct sensory phenomena to falsify it, then there is already such 'proof' it is wrong, but most Physicists fudge it with 'Dark Matter'. 'Just a theory' IS what all science is- some theories require insanity to deny, others intelligence.

[rspawn]

"You all must remember that this is JUST A THEROY!

In other words, they cannot prove it."

That is a gross misunderstanding; in science a theory is only a theory if it has been proven.

[aznr4v3m4st3r]

I think your theory of theories being unable to be proved correct cannot be proved correct because its a theory =) lulz

[Relativisticism]

"please no machine is going to solve that question."

that's what they said about the hubble telescope and we learned tons with it and it is still useful. I hope you get a chance to eat your words after we learn a bunch of new stuff

[monkey670]

No money of mine is going to that excuse, let time decide our understanding, please no machine is going to solve that question.

[marlon1972]

let time, lols, rethink what u've written here. moron

[snickerkill89]

I have no idea what this man is talking about, but in a sense it amazes me to know about these things.

[flashydee123]

I love Physics <3

[dupreee27]

nice try sassy pants

[DICKSNEAZE1]

Im completly excited about what will come of the super haydron collider when it is put to use. However, I am also very concerned about the possible production of black holes when said experiment is conducted. Im 25 and I didn't go to MIT, in fact I only went to college for 1 semester. I do however have a knack for partical physics and quantum mechanics and the production of a black hole, or even several, is a very real senario.

[jamesarongray]

I wouldn't worry about a black hole dude

[DeuceGenius]

fuck physics lol wheres my bong?

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

are you dumb

[lxfarhitxl]

Whats A Physicists salary?

[thefullmonte03]

Between $50,000 and $600,000

[ThermalTeeth]

just give me food to eat, fundings for my research and forget about salary.

[kciNJNadon]

If we find the Higgs, what exactly will that provide mankind? What sort of technology do you imagine will come of this?

[TRUTHSEEKER009]

Maybe nothing. But if we prove the Higgs field is there and we learn how to distort the field, we might be about to reduce the weight of objects, making cheaper space launches, and faster space ships. I personaly have doubts that there is a Higgs field, sounds the newest "ether" theory.

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

you idiot why say nothing you always learn something

[jamesarongray]

Wot eva the imagination brings... Maybe a new gravity propellant

[cmfluteguy]

Possessing patents certainly does not qualify one to be a physicist. Edison was certainly not a physicist. Tesla did not have adequate schooling in the mathematics or the physics of the time to understand in depth what he was fooling with. He relied on intuition primarily. He was more of a tinker/inventor type. Nothing wrong with that, but he was no physicist. That is certain. There are no accepted theories in any branch of science that he was responsible for. He was a gadget guy.

[tvobssesed]

As far as "gadget guy" is concerned, I recommend reading some literature before dismissing one of the leading scientists of modern time.

You should read " The man who invented 20th century " by Robert Lomas to get greater insinght into "gadgets" that mr Tesla invented.

The " Fooling " you are talking about led to use of AC as standard way of powering electrical devices, invention of radio, wireless transfer of electrical energy, etc. etc.

Poor choce of words on your behalf.

[cmfluteguy]

I would suggest that you examine physics texts to see if you can find anywhere the name Tesla mentioned in regard to a valid physical theory.

Biographies are certainly no judge of any real science done by Tesla. I have always admired Tesla for what he did accomplish, nonetheless he did not use or understand the mathematical tools available at the time, and his work was on applications. Perhaps he was an early example of an engineer. To say that he is a "leading scientist" is absurd.

[tvobssesed]

You are right, he was not physicist, Pytagoras wasnt maths expert, Archimedes was not an engineer nor physicist nor mathematician. Just to mention a few.

But their discoveries matter to all mankind from the poorest person to the richest and smartest person on earth (if there is a such thing ).

Theory of relativity does matter to a scientist but it doesnt little for an average person.

Tesla's inventions matter to everybody.

E=Mc2 - nice.. aaand ?

Alternating current- where do I start ?

[tonyosvaldo]

E=Mc2 - nice.. aaand ?

Well E=Mc2 lead to the Atom Bomb and from there we went to nuclear power plants. Not much I guess.

[tvobssesed]

So why then according to you, a person that comes up with E=Mc2 is a scientist but a persont hat comes up with AC and radio etc. is a tinkerer ? What was Edison then ? A scientist or a tinkerer ? Where is that border ?

Do you have to use maths to explain something that works anyway ? So if you invent something and it just works but you dont explain it by lengthy theorizing, that invention is somehow less important ? Average citizen hardly cares how it works, as long as it does...

[uturniaphobic]

not sure, but I don't think the field of physics even existed back at the turn of the last century when Edison and Tesla were alive.

quote from this vid regarding particle-weight-decays into lighter particles.

"...count the number at it's always three" Tesla was obsessed with the number three.

[unhealthytruthseeker]

Uhh... The theories of electromagnetism were founded by the time Thomas and Nikola were doing their work.

[uturniaphobic]

sure, but what about atom and particle study the quantum side? People were eating/drinking radioactive uranium products and elixirs to heal their ills back then.

True physics as a field of science did not come around until the 1940s I believe. In fact it was special relativity that brought it on if I remember correctly.

[unhealthytruthseeker]

Define "true physics."

[uturniaphobic]

well I'm no Webster but physics is the study of matter and energy and their relationship to each other the, study of the very small parts of matter and how the effect and are effected by the environment they're in. Atoms were only found in the mid/early 1800s I think with the invention of the microscope.

Physics before the 20th century was defined as a study of natural laws or natural philosophy If remember my history correctly.

It was the theory of relativity that started quantum thinking.

[unhealthytruthseeker]

It was Plank's description of blackbody radiation in terms of the quantization of light that started quantum thinking. The concept of energy was well defined long before quantum mechanics. Both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism of classical physics deal with it, and they were originally derived directly from Newton's laws and calculus.

[uturniaphobic]

that's all great but was the field of physics defined back then? I think that's where this conversation started. I don't believe the field named "physics" was established until the early 1940s. Honestly I'm no expert in the history of sciences, but I remember hearing that in a classroom eons ago. Yes it was a physics class and yes the class was underway at the time I heard it. )

[boamuro]

3:56 the guy sitting in the front is already lost and spacing out. haha I wonder how many people are actually seriously listening to him there.

[boxa888]

THERE ARE OTHER FORCES.(11:00) everyone please look up nikola teslas work with his wireless energy towers,he was sending energy faster than light through the earth to give the world a industrial energy and internet 100 yrs ago.i put up information on this energy transfer.the tower was called the wardenclyffe tower,we should be building these instead of the LHC just because of the advancement of humanity scientifically and peacefully!please look it up,we can send info and energy faster than light

[cmfluteguy]

This assertion by you and or Mr. Tesla is absolutely wrong! The only "thing" that can travel faster than light are quantum entanglements like those shown in the now famous Aspect experiment. If energy could "travel" faster than light, then the Standard model would be absolutely incorrect. During the era before the big bang (called the inflationary era), spacetime did expand faster than light speed, but energy still not exceed light speed.

[boxa888]

but how do you or i know that this is true!, one way or the other,we just tell what we learn, we are not the discoverers of this. i just know tesla pulsed the earth with high voltage, and for the pulses to contain energy,the energy traveling to the other side of the earth and back to the transmitter had to be traveling 1.5 times faster than light to keep resonant energy in the waves and allow industrial power to be put around the planet!some scientist say his tower was a quantum tunneling device

[cmfluteguy]

I know what I said is correct because the Standard model discussed in this video is correct. The standard model is a theory based entirely upon the fact that the speed of light cannot be surpassed. It has been shown by observation and measurement by thousands of physicists that the speed of light is the maximum speed that mass and energy can travel.

Mr. Tesla was not a physicist and did not have the analytical tools to really understand that what he was claiming was wrong.

[tvobssesed]

Standard model appears to be correct.

But ! Earth appeared to fe flat to leading scientists of that time. Some were so sure in that teory that they even burned people who dared to disagree.

Then somebody burried that theory...

Dont you think that standard theory could be proven wrong in the future.

Speed of light can not be surpassed ? Maybe..

Science has a nasty habbit of totally falling apart after some new discovery. Maybe they are measuring it wrong.

One can never be sure

[cmfluteguy]

The standard model has been verified to better that 1 part in 1,000,000,000,000 in some cases. Thousands of experiments have been performed and they all agree to that accuracy. We know that the Standard model is incomplete in some regards. It can't be totally thrown out though. It can be improved upon, but not discarded. The standard model does not include general relativity which it must do when you consider what happens at extremely high energy conditions like at the big bang.

[Craggles17]

Mr. Tesla was not a physicist

Thats a sodding disgrace right there. Tesla never claimed to be sending energy faster than the speed of light, what he did claim however was he could send energy wirelessly, tap limitless energy, control people's minds and build death rays. He also has claims to 700 patents and a god damn physical unit is named after him.

If that doesn't make him a physicist what the hell does?

[qwerty7546]

great talk!

amazing shine to that head though, if you;ve noticed.

[baalChrist]

Great talk, but the man has the wunderlust.

[arkmagix]

I honestly can't understand a single sentence in this whole video 100% completely.

It's like I need to know the definitions of thousands of little words, to get his point.

[davidwizard2006]

that guy once talk in google for quantum computing, but such device can be used for even more powerful quantum gravity computing, the information can travel through time, directly forth and back from the future when reaching lowest level

[tiberux]

awesome video, thanks for posting

[davidwizard2006]

so great