4:30 ........ how did CNN know so fast that it was terrorist? When they did not find proof until weeks later after the debree clean up.... and then oh there's a passport
considering the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition, this doesn't surprise me. There's zero evidence that the other 2 planes (pentagon and flight 93) crashed at all
The scene with the black plane is ALL CGI, but its just a graphic illustrating how it happened, not meant to fool anyone. This kind of shit it setting truthers back
@YooTubeCritc Being as how I left that comment months ago and youtube sucks for being able to find your comment again, I have no way to defend myself and tell you that YOU"RE the dumb fuck, like the internet trained me to do.
But seriously, this video is wicked weak. I believe in a conspiracy, but this was dookie
okay how is minute 9:15 consider similar angles? the one to the left is facing towards two sides of the building coming to a point the angle of the building and the second one is almost dead on to one side?
You people are so retarded this September Clue documentary is so inaccurate it's sicking.
If planes really crashed into WTC, I want numbers of those flights, lists of people who were in those planes and logs how control towers lost contact with those planes. Now I got you brainwashed goverment supporters, huh?
@Indy7272 Just look up these flight numbers you will find thousands of sites with the names of people and whether they died on the plane (has the specific flight) or in the buildings. Good start is project 2996.
The control towers lost contact because the terrorists were experienced pilots. These guys disabled the Mode -C transponder( the locator). They had been schooled and some received their multi engine license.
You want flight logs once again you can find this in thousands of sources
Dude.. the photo you showed us of the plane was of a plane flying at average speed... the one the hit the building was going maybe 3 times faster and it looks like the news cast was catching the footage in 280p maybe... Where the fuck did this theory of NO PLANES even come from???? I mean EVERYONE caught it on tape. By saying no planes hit the tower would be the same as saying certain animals don't exist. But they do BECAUSE WE CAUGHT IT ON CAMERA.
2:44 OMG both of these shots were filmed from 2 WAYYYY different distances! You can barely see the white on the close up shot so why would you be able to see the color from so far?
There is footage of that, but The question was brought up in footage of the 2nd plane hitting the tower, it did NOT look like a boeing 747... It looked like a Military drone.
@nathenism There was no plane. It's much easier to pretend the existence of something than to prove the non-existence. Everybody just thinks that in the moments before impact they were just not looking... :(
yes when you actually have amateur footage on this clip? The first point you made on this film was ridiculous - about the angles - the cameras are on different sides of the buildings at very different ranges from the buildings...try backing up your argument with some serious science then people might give your arguments a second look.
@This is an older version of Sept clues. Pls look at 911 amateur by the author of this Simon Shack which cuts apart that part of this giant hoax. Back to the TV stations. 100,000 dollar video cameras. Now pls explain the different colours on a clear day, the backgrounds missing etc.
You might also explain how an aircraft can enter one side of a building and come out the other side intact.
this video proves nothing. There are many different types of cameras, all with differing sound capture qualities - think about a digital camcorder, often it's necessary to use an external mic to pick up sounds less than ten feet away. As for the 'colour' issues - it's where the cameras are positioned in relation to the sunlight...and how many of the images were correctly 'white balanced' ? No way to verify that. Lastly...fast moving objects will always blur and jump around.
For those people who actually are qualified in Media/Film/Video analysis - take a drink every time you see the flaws in the analysis in this series. See if you can last at least two videos before passing out drunk.
@skyarcher No background missing - it's being shot from too low an angle to see the water, as opposed to the other shot which is shot from above and thus the water can be seen.
Only the media people were interviewed early as they had direct lines and thus could be contact/call in the quickest and go around the switchboard. Common sense rules.
None of these videos are faked. You are simply seeing what you want to see as opposed to what is actually there.
@skyarcher None of the videos shot on September 11 are fake, although I have seen the audio manipulated by a few of the deniers such as in "9/11 Mysteries".
The media only mentioned stories of the planes because that's what happened!
As for your "nose in/nose out" bs, you realise that other footage clearly shows the debris being ejected from the building before the fireball? Not the nose of the plane, just debris.
I really suggest people watch watch?v=d1V7TovxzBc and September Clues Busted!
are you serious 7:15 you can totally see the wings, I can see the engines too you guys are making insane acusations. I do believe this is an inside job but my sister has seen the planes with her own two eyes and people did die, a lot of people died. why would they spend so much time on a fake plane when they could just ram one into the building anyways.
People get way to hung up on particular groups, it just discredits all the work I'm doing. I don't think anyone has done more for humanity than myself. I am the only way we are going to win. Anyone who claims to be for humanity and doesn't mention my name is a fraud. Crused are they that keep money, Blessed are they who give on to me.
There are so many stupid things you've mentioned in this video, I don't even want to get into it.. but one thing, there is a difference in camera quality from 10 miles away and from 1 block away.. "these are not the same planes" good god you are stupid.
Black is not white? But surely it's just a matter of lighting, the way the light happens to hit planes from a certain angle? Come, you must do better than that...
@weikko79 The maker of the film could have argued it better but it's still true. The plane in the wide angle video at 1:10 is totally black. No reflections of light whatsoever.
@faysalaaa1 Definitely. I agree. Oh, by the way, I came to find that part 6 (I think) of this seriez somewhat explainz what may have happened to the planes and passengerz. It getz mentioned a couple more times in the later vidz too, though it still wasn't made clear. :)
Location, location, location explains why the sounds are differnent, why the plane looks different and if there are "no wings" explain the clearly visable jet engines when you pause the video. arnoldskit is right!!!! The wings ARE visable at 7:14!!!! skyarcher you are the one trying to be the brainwasher!!!!
@skyarcher Actually, the right wing looks blocked out by the light, and the left wing, although convincing I must add, could just be blurred. I see the blurry outline of a wing there. Once again, some of these comparisons you have are convincing, but most of them could simply be a misinterpretation. Example: the chopper in the left shot was too far away and white to see in that shine.
@skyarcher Since you mention eyesight, what's your take on the eyewitness accounts of those who were there in person on the streets watching all these ... errr .... "computer graphics" take place live?
@skyarcher I was expecting you to tell me they were all holograms implanted into the global psyche which I think would have been a more cost effective alternative. Please at least try to be serious.
If you look carefully through the window of floor 23 you see a scumbag long island dago getting his dick sucked by his brooklyn filthy whore secretary !!
who ever made this is an idiot...maybe alot of these clips were recorded using mobile phoen camera..therefore teh image quality isnt that good...and so its blurry!!...and also not very good on frames!!!!!! it was 2 planes that hit the towers...different engine sounds due to different engine models...RR, PW, GE...now listen to some of them sound sthen listen to an american 767 and compare...then tell me what engines you think the AA 767 uses!! cause i know!!!! RETARD!!!!!!!1
@skyarcher - Some is and some isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about. I just read on your page that you don't believe nuclear weapons exist, and you think there were no victims killed on 911. Your denial level is off the charts.
at 2.50 look at the video it almost looks like a cartoon when he says unbelievable i agree what is this video of ????come on .For some good info on the pentagon watch.... security alert sensitive information.
Speed of sound is not taken into concideration (it takes sound more time to reach further distances) nor is the relfection of sound to hard surfaces (multiple impact sounds and interference which makes the sound volume lower depending on where you stand), the fact that sound volume drops off with the second power of distance.
Look from 8:54 to 9:06, which is a real boeing plane, as yoy stated. When the plane is coming towards the camera man, the plane looks white. After it passes him, it looks black. It has to do with shadows. It has to do with the position of the sun. It has to do with the angle and position of the camera man. The reason the plane looks black sometimes and white other times has to do with angles and shadows. How is that not obvious to you?
This video attempts to use logic, but fails. The first part, with the different plane colors.. first of all, they were taken with different cameras. Secondly, different angles. And third, different distances. The camera the plane is shot with and the angle and distance matter a great deal. And as far as your "steel slicing aluminum wings" comment.. you think a plane travelling at 500+ mph would just bounce off?
Also, when the vid is paused, you can see the damn left engine. And you can see the left wing when the plane flys by the sky, NOT THE BUILDING. this occurs before the video pauses.
Yes you can see it, but it is a tad hard to see. It's right when the home vid freezes, if you follow the place from the right wing, which is already clear as day, to the body, then follow the same path to the left, you can absolutely see the wig. Also, if it was in fact a missile, then how can a missle make a hole that looks almost like a sword cut through. any hole i saw in the building was always like a slice, if a missle did it, then it would be one big ass hole in the middle of the building
those sounds are BS, too. they like an engine still powering up.. again. aand, for that departing shot you took, look where the impact is on the plane, and where the fireball shows up in the right video, the right shot wouldn't have caught, and that arrow you put on there is way too high. the right shot was closer, meaning the plane would seem lower than in the left shot, but the arrows are in the same spot, move that right shot lower, and you'll see the plane go by. there is no doubt in my mind
ok, when you pause it the home video 7:15, idk what everyone else is seeing, but i see two engines to either side of the main body, along with one wings. i'll admit, it is only one, however, once the video restarts, i can clearly see the left wing right before it goes into the building. now, i don't have the best vision, i do wear glasses, but if i can see, then it's obvious
YES THERE IS SOUND OF THAT IMPACT!!! start at approx. 4:57 or 4:58, you hear a plane revving up it's engines until 5:01, when you hear 2 thuds, which could be the initial hit and then the tail of the plane hitting, then at 5:02, the fire and smoke start billowing out of the tower. spoiled that one, sorry
Not only that, but :30 to 1:00 show you don't understand how telephoto lenses compress a scene.
This video is a perfect example of photographic analysis being done by someone who has zero understanding of photographic concepts. This is why you shouldn't get your information from YouTube.
Call me 'clueless' 'sad' whatever you like. Playground stuff.
You still have not explained how
1. how a supposed silver shiny object in clear visibility and drenched in sun is completely black ??
would you like to explain this?
2. How an object pictured in one tv shot is flying level into the tower and in another shot is divebombing into the tower. how in the last 5 secs b4 impact the same plane descends 500 feet AND doesnt descend 500 feet??
Also, September clues is over 90 minutes long. So far you disagree with 2 of those minutes.
As for your disagreement covering these 2 mins you seem to be claiming that a plane can be simultaneously coloured black and white and that a plane can fly level and descend rapidly at the same time??
You claim these anomalies lie in the lens of a camera? Is this correct?
Do I take it you agree with the rest of presentation because you have not brought up any other issues with it??
You "do" photography, eh? Great! I'm a professional photographer, so we'll discuss this on a level playing field. Please discuss how a video camera using standard evaluative metering would meter 1:12 differently from 1:40. Then tell me how many stops of latitude your video camera has. Go.
"but appears on tv as a black horse."
If the surrounding environment were sufficiently bright, it would. Someone who does photography should know this.
1. how a supposed silver shiny object in clear visibility and drenched in sun is completely black ??would you like to explain this? "
Yes I have, you just don't want to be educated on the matter. It is dark because the overall scene around it is brighter than it, and video cameras have narrow exposure latitude. You don't understand this, because you don't wish to become educated about camera exposure.
I dont wish to listen to a shill going on about nonsense actually)
'the video camera have narrow exposure latitude' !
really ?
All of the other elements of the picture seem ok. The plane itself is silver and should reflect light the way shiny objects do. It is completely black however.
Actually the sun is behind the 'photographer' here, early enough in the morning low down in the sky on a perfectly visible day. You cannot get better photographic conditions. The 'photographer' in not shooting INTO the sun!!
Exactly where did I say the vids were shooting into the sun? Now you can't even comprehend what I write. I said "Look at the buildings lit by the sun". You do know what that means, don't you? Now quit ducking the question and explain the difference between the buildings at 1:12 and 1:40.
The building at 1:40 has no features are all. This is fake footage. The plane enters the building without slowing down. This is faked. It defies the laws physics.
The 'scene' with the buildings at 1:14 is highly suspect, which is the point of Sept clues, Tv fakery, but even still, in this 'shot' the buildings behind the plane have features, albeit cartoonish ones. The sunlight falling on the plane should make it glitter and it does not. Again, this is fake footage )
STOP spamming on this channel with your multiple profiles. take it elsewhere. People can read the comments you left under your first profile and make their own mind up thanks you.
"How an object pictured in one tv shot is flying level into the tower and in another shot is divebombing into the tower."
I've explained this as well (telephoto lenses compress scenes) but you don't want to become educated about that either. You laugh and scoff at common, basic photographic principles as though I'm making them up, which just makes you look stupid.
Again, i will let other people decide(7,000 people have watched this) who is coming over as stupid.
You did not answer me this. September clues is over 90 mins long. You have a problem with 2 of those mins. Do you agree with the rest of the presentation then?
"You did not answer me this. September clues is over 90 mins long. You have a problem with 2 of those mins. Do you agree with the rest of the presentation then?"
Oh no, I'm sure I could destroy the whole thing, but we can only take this one point at a time and you still haven't gotten why the first two minutes are wrong.
On my video camera I always lock the exposure as I dont want the iris to open if the scene suddenly darkens. All modern cameras have features which automatically adjust to different light settings. The fake pan shot here would be ample time for a camera to set itself up.
Your inability to answer the questions i have put to you in a reasonable way has become tiring. best of luck.
I like the effort you've put in and the detail of your analysis but it's all wrong. You're being passionately rediculous. Idon't know whether to praise you or pity you. Both I suppose. Don't lve your version of the uth so much that it blinds yo to reality.
Pls dont send me a personal message thank you. Now again... yes explain which parts of this video you disagree with and why you disagree or else get lost.
Sorry, I thought you were commenting on one of my videos - something completely different. I was "incomprehensible" because my keyboard was playing up. It was good of you, and right, to ask me what parts I disagree with. I cannot do it in this small space. You have simply misinterpreted the information in the 911 footage. You are not giving proper regard to 'perspective' and your conclusions are absurd. If you were patient I would undertake a dialogue with you. Cheers anyway.
I have a lot of time. Now you can start. What part of the video presentation here by mr. simonshack regarding 'perspective' is wrong or is misinformation.
Give me a time and pls describe the way it should look. You come here claiming some sort of expertise in this field so lets hear your learned opinion.
In that video, the same woman holding a gray card is rendered both black and white, something this video says can't possibly happen, thus proving the maker of this video doesn't understand the basics of camera exposure.
Pls point to the time in the video you are addressing. There are many issues raised here including the the fact that different cameras have the 'plane' approaching the building at totally contradictory angles. What exactly are you referring to?? You mention 'exposure' pls point to the part in this video where this applies?? Back up your claims or else get lost.
You STILL have not said what it is you have a problem with?? Is it the plane in one shot which is a black and in another shot white?? The black plane shot.. the nearside of the WTC is illuminated in sunlight .. yet the plane nearside is totally black .. terrible computer fakery. I obviously would have a different opinion about who the word 'sad' refers to.
A clear day. perfect visibility. embarrassingly bad graphic inserts . Take your fuzzy logic elsewhere.
"You STILL have not said what it is you have a problem with?"
The fact that you don't understand how a video camera pointed at the bright sky can render the plane dark, while a video camera with lots of dark shadowy buildings in the frame can render the plane white. It all has to do with camera exposure, something you have proven you don't understand.
Now you're trying to block me to avoid further embarrassment. Not something a person interested in the truth would do.
this is the internet , we can say anything on the internet)For example, I saw a herd of elephants cartwheeling into the WTC )
yu say plane was sliver? yet here at 2.30 in this video the plane is a black blob. Very crude fake.
Tell us more ? which direction did your 'plane' come from? you claim to be a witness to the biggest mass murder in US recent history..where can i read your witness statement? please direct me )
OMG This video is fucking absurdly stupid!! For example, I can see with my own eyes how the angle of "magical disappearing" helicopter and buildings at the end of the video wouldn't allow you to see to helicopter at all. There's about 30 degrees of difference in that angle, they weren't similar in any respect. Turn the camera to the right 30 degrees and there's the Heli! You conspiracy nuts need to get a new hobby sheesh!
A plane going 300 hundred miles an hour wouldn't show wings, or would only show them distorted, in a camera with a slow frame rate Duh! Man you fuckers are fucking insanely stupid! You're are right though, there is brainwashing going on, it's on YouTube! These videos are VERY disrespectful to the people who died on that day, asshole! You need to grow a heart and a conscience!
So your saying that the 50 something video's all by TV, people, family's, that look the same relativity were ALL fake... If your saying that the TV ones were fake, what about home videos? They were fake? no? then how the HELL do you get the footage without a plane, and put fake ones in, more importantly, WHY!?
okay a missle would have demolished the entire building not jus hit that one part. n cause some smoke but actually BLOWN up the building. and out of the millions of ppl in nyc. someone wudda been like it was a missle. this shit is so stupid.
che este video es una mierda.. aparte vs qien sos para decir q no fue un avion!! vs estuviste ahi??!! mira si fuiste vs el q truco todas las fotos!!?? mejor dedicate a otra cosa.. y dejale esto a los q realmente saben q paso.
one of the easiest for me to say is the comparison of missile whistles. distance and physical barriers (i.e. the walls of a recording studio) will roll off the higher harmonics of any sound (hitting a trashcan lid in front of your face as opposed to 20 away feet on the other side of a wall). the pitch discrepancy is natural, and may even provide evidence contrary to the point you're trying to make, BECAUSE they had the same decay.
Also note that "Mrs Theresa Renaud is the voice of "Bri" in the FAKE audio in "What We Saw" which is another SCAM video.
Check it out for yourselves.
The networks (all of them) were not bribed it is their job to lie. They are the mouth piece for the "official story" LIE. When have the media ever told us any truth? They are 100 percent involved. Every time some one or group challenges anything; they mock and insult.They are "public opinion" they rig every poll.
I could hear the SOUND of the plane BEFORE it hits and the FIRST time I saw this vid and can clearly hear it every time afterward. How do explain that? The fact that the handheld didn't pick up the actual explosion can be due to many factors. But one things for sure. A 767 is LOUD directly overhead.
the black plane was real, the rest was faked. actual eyewitness acounts said that they saw a plane, just that "that wasn't an american airlines" quoted one woman.
actually my previous comment was made before i finished your whole series so i may have been mistaken. one thing is for sure, it wasn't american airlines.
i was there, 2 blocks away when it happened. i heard the whine of the 'planes', which didnt sound like ne planes ive ever heard, which was proceeded by the sound of rolling explosions. It definitely didn't seem like a plane had struck the building because there were too many seperate, rolling explosions that could be clearly heard from street level
you also seem amazed that the lady has some kind of super vision to see a plane crash into the builinds from her long distance perspective. Take your ass on over to Sandy Hook, New Jersey and take a look at the city...You can see it perfectly on a clear day or night and that is at least 30 miles away by water! Get off this kick 9/11 is a conspiracy because it wasn't you fucking Skitzo's
why do you seem to be amazed that aluminum can cut through steel? Brass is softer than steel too and it can cut through steel too. Have you not ever fired a high powered rifle. Try a chinese version of the ak-47 7.62x39..that is a .30cal bullet and it cuts through steel too! Fucking dumbasses
okay, well i stopped it at 2:38, so plz dont b mad if it explains it more later. but i dont get it, i've only watched pt. 1 of ur vids so far (great job, btw), but i dont get it. i beleive all this from the news stations and stuff, but wut about ppl's REAL videos? they got real planes. didnt they? well so i tihnk...but i just dont get it. well, now i get the whole "black plane" thing and it chainging colours and stuff. but...ugh, im so confused now. the first vid was great tho!
4:30 ........ how did CNN know so fast that it was terrorist? When they did not find proof until weeks later after the debree clean up.... and then oh there's a passport
goldenknight777 3 weeks ago
All the plane paths match up watch?v=-K-WjsHa_2k
jawsflounderace 4 weeks ago
Just tell me it's natural that at 1:46 both plane and tower showed no reaction at all.
80sMeavyHetal 1 month ago
considering the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition, this doesn't surprise me. There's zero evidence that the other 2 planes (pentagon and flight 93) crashed at all
khunopie 1 month ago
fucking morons man.
sandman130 1 month ago
I don't know if I can buy this...CGI Planes...really?
Joeysnamehere 3 months ago
The scene with the black plane is ALL CGI, but its just a graphic illustrating how it happened, not meant to fool anyone. This kind of shit it setting truthers back
intrnlprym84evr 4 months ago
@intrnlprym84evr why use cgi if there really wasa plane you dumb fuck
YooTubeCritc 2 weeks ago
@YooTubeCritc Being as how I left that comment months ago and youtube sucks for being able to find your comment again, I have no way to defend myself and tell you that YOU"RE the dumb fuck, like the internet trained me to do.
But seriously, this video is wicked weak. I believe in a conspiracy, but this was dookie
intrnlprym84evr 2 weeks ago
OK... I had to stop less than 2 minutes into this. "black plane - white plane"... WAIT ! I thought you said there were NO planes ???
Which is it !!!???
Either there WERE (as documented by HUNDREDS of cameras) or there WEREN'T ! (as you had said earlier).
Can't have both you narcissictic schizophrenic bipolar freak who just wants comments on here.
And I fell right into your trap.
TacomaPaul 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This must be the stupidest theory ever.. wake up! Everyone saw a plane, except from you.. lol
KenBekir 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This must be the stupidest theory ever.. wake up! Everyone saw a plane, except from you.. lol
KenBekir 4 months ago
This must be the stupidest theory ever.. wake up! Everyone saw a plane, except from you.. lol
KenBekir 4 months ago
This must be the stupidest theory ever.. wake up! Everyone saw a plane, except from you.. lol
KenBekir 4 months ago
1:28 uhhmm i think it is a snake ..
AKidWithADream 4 months ago
okay how is minute 9:15 consider similar angles? the one to the left is facing towards two sides of the building coming to a point the angle of the building and the second one is almost dead on to one side?
You people are so retarded this September Clue documentary is so inaccurate it's sicking.
TheRns1016 4 months ago
Get of the pipe, this is sooooooooo bogus lmao
foureleven86 6 months ago
maybe one angle is from the side, and the other angle is from the bottom up...so yes it can happen both ways
mistafreshprince 8 months ago
there is witnesses out there i suppose but where are they? why not after 10 yrs hasnt somebody came out to say hey yea i saw two planes hit
neknek63 8 months ago
The Plane was tilted toward the camera, so the angle makes it look like there are no missiles
1997coolguy 9 months ago
This is total bullshit
1997coolguy 9 months ago
wtf! 7:17 looks nothing at all like an aeroplane..
mischkabunny 9 months ago
Well what happended to all the people on the flights of the original planes if the original planes didnt hit the towers?
wakeytillidie 10 months ago
@wakeytillidie Good question. What if the people were just made up? nothing happened them. Pls visit septemberclues dot info
all your questions are answered.
skyarcher 9 months ago
@skyarcher but there were some pretty well known semi-public figures on the planes.
jaandebruer 4 months ago
@wakeytillidie assasination order or the people have been given new identys fk noise
shane9131 4 months ago
@wakeytillidie watch loose change..
YooTubeCritc 2 weeks ago
um, i saw wings on the "loud" plane
Abr022575 10 months ago
If planes really crashed into WTC, I want numbers of those flights, lists of people who were in those planes and logs how control towers lost contact with those planes. Now I got you brainwashed goverment supporters, huh?
Indy7272 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Indy7272 You fucking serious...where the hell have you been.
United Airlines Flight 11: Departure Boston: Destination LA: Crashed WTC at 8:46am
United Airlines Flight 175: Departure Boston: destination LA: Crashed WTC at 9:03am
American Airlines Flight 77: Departure Dulles: Destination LA: Crashed Pentagon 9:37am
tmdffn 11 months ago
@Indy7272 Just look up these flight numbers you will find thousands of sites with the names of people and whether they died on the plane (has the specific flight) or in the buildings. Good start is project 2996.
The control towers lost contact because the terrorists were experienced pilots. These guys disabled the Mode -C transponder( the locator). They had been schooled and some received their multi engine license.
You want flight logs once again you can find this in thousands of sources
tmdffn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Indy7272You fucking serious...where the hell have you been.
United Airlines Flight 11: Departure Boston: Destination LA: Crashed WTC at 8:46am
United Airlines Flight 175: Departure Boston: destination LA: Crashed WTC at 9:03am
American Airlines Flight 77: Departure Dulles: Destination LA: Crashed Pentagon 9:37am
tmdffn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Indy7272 You fucking serious...where the hell have you been.
United Airlines Flight 11: Departure Boston: Destination LA: Crashed WTC at 8:46am
United Airlines Flight 175: Departure Boston: destination LA: Crashed WTC at 9:03am
American Airlines Flight 77: Departure Dulles: Destination LA: Crashed Pentagon 9:37am
tmdffn 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Indy7272 You fucking serious...where the hell have you been.
United Airlines Flight 11: Departure Boston: Destination LA: Crashed WTC at 8:46am
United Airlines Flight 175: Departure Boston: destination LA: Crashed WTC at 9:03am
American Airlines Flight 77: Departure Dulles: Destination LA: Crashed Pentagon 9:37am
tmdffn 11 months ago
@Indy7272 Fucking Serious?
UA Flight 11
UA Flight 175
AA Flight 77
UA Flight 93
Even hardcore truthers will say this september clues bullshit is just that. BULLSHIT.
tmdffn 11 months ago
What about this vid?
watch?v=2iGYVh7HZo8
I firmly believe 9/11 was an inside job, but how would you explain the plain on that video??
juanjillocr 1 year ago
are their no ground zero witnesses who saw the planes hit the towers?
nathenism 1 year ago
@nathenism visit septemberclues dot info ... all the answers there
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher you cant even answer our questions ur full of it...
MrGeassR2 6 months ago
Dude.. the photo you showed us of the plane was of a plane flying at average speed... the one the hit the building was going maybe 3 times faster and it looks like the news cast was catching the footage in 280p maybe... Where the fuck did this theory of NO PLANES even come from???? I mean EVERYONE caught it on tape. By saying no planes hit the tower would be the same as saying certain animals don't exist. But they do BECAUSE WE CAUGHT IT ON CAMERA.
MrGeassR2 6 months ago
2:44 OMG both of these shots were filmed from 2 WAYYYY different distances! You can barely see the white on the close up shot so why would you be able to see the color from so far?
MrGeassR2 6 months ago
@nathenism majority of them are dead....
later on. either "comitted suicide" or "accident" or murdered.
spartaremix299 8 months ago
Comment removed
CarnEvil716 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is footage of that, but The question was brought up in footage of the 2nd plane hitting the tower, it did NOT look like a boeing 747... It looked like a Military drone.
CarnEvil716 4 months ago
@nathenism There was no plane. It's much easier to pretend the existence of something than to prove the non-existence. Everybody just thinks that in the moments before impact they were just not looking... :(
80sMeavyHetal 1 month ago
Wow this video is amazingly stupid and it just keeps getting dumber and dumber only a brain dead sheep would believe this crap
Notasheep187 1 year ago
skyarcher i think you may be wasting your time. lots of sheeple are in denial.
they will soon learn it was an inside job.
YungDGTM 1 year ago 2
yes when you actually have amateur footage on this clip? The first point you made on this film was ridiculous - about the angles - the cameras are on different sides of the buildings at very different ranges from the buildings...try backing up your argument with some serious science then people might give your arguments a second look.
klinepatsy 1 year ago
@This is an older version of Sept clues. Pls look at 911 amateur by the author of this Simon Shack which cuts apart that part of this giant hoax. Back to the TV stations. 100,000 dollar video cameras. Now pls explain the different colours on a clear day, the backgrounds missing etc.
You might also explain how an aircraft can enter one side of a building and come out the other side intact.
Lets hear you.
skyarcher 1 year ago 2
this video proves nothing. There are many different types of cameras, all with differing sound capture qualities - think about a digital camcorder, often it's necessary to use an external mic to pick up sounds less than ten feet away. As for the 'colour' issues - it's where the cameras are positioned in relation to the sunlight...and how many of the images were correctly 'white balanced' ? No way to verify that. Lastly...fast moving objects will always blur and jump around.
klinepatsy 1 year ago
@klinepatsy . I love your logic. The TV stations use camcorders to report the news?
Brilliant . thanks.
skyarcher 1 year ago
For those people who actually are qualified in Media/Film/Video analysis - take a drink every time you see the flaws in the analysis in this series. See if you can last at least two videos before passing out drunk.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani We are back to your 'expert eye' lol
Claiming that only 'experts' can see if something is faked or not is ridiculous.
Common sense rules.
A plane cannot pass through one side of a building and come out the other intact.
Pls explain that one.
The ludicrous TV footage is missing the NY background. Explain that one.
Explain mostly only media people seeing 'planes'.
Why did no one turn up in LAX airport where 3 of the 'planes' were heading?
Come on expert.
skyarcher 1 year ago 2
@skyarcher No background missing - it's being shot from too low an angle to see the water, as opposed to the other shot which is shot from above and thus the water can be seen.
Only the media people were interviewed early as they had direct lines and thus could be contact/call in the quickest and go around the switchboard. Common sense rules.
None of these videos are faked. You are simply seeing what you want to see as opposed to what is actually there.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani There is only one shot where the background is visible . Would you like me to point you to it? The other videos are ridiculous fakes.
Only media mention planes because they are selling the story of planes.
I asked you explain how a plane can enter one side of a building and come out the side intact. Please explain how this can happen before we move on.
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher None of the videos shot on September 11 are fake, although I have seen the audio manipulated by a few of the deniers such as in "9/11 Mysteries".
The media only mentioned stories of the planes because that's what happened!
As for your "nose in/nose out" bs, you realise that other footage clearly shows the debris being ejected from the building before the fireball? Not the nose of the plane, just debris.
I really suggest people watch watch?v=d1V7TovxzBc and September Clues Busted!
Clarrisani 1 year ago
are you serious 7:15 you can totally see the wings, I can see the engines too you guys are making insane acusations. I do believe this is an inside job but my sister has seen the planes with her own two eyes and people did die, a lot of people died. why would they spend so much time on a fake plane when they could just ram one into the building anyways.
Seanisa 1 year ago
as you can see at 9:09 the color of the sky is very different, one is lighter blue and another darker... WTF?
ElHeavyMachine 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElHeavyMachine 1 year ago
4:35 Was that real in London? I'm not sure if I ever heard of that happening or not. Someone please enlighten me. Thanx.
1ballz08 1 year ago
911 was a hoax. Ask any smart, inquisitive 15 year old. Or just watch the video deconstruction.
inova11901 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People get way to hung up on particular groups, it just discredits all the work I'm doing. I don't think anyone has done more for humanity than myself. I am the only way we are going to win. Anyone who claims to be for humanity and doesn't mention my name is a fraud. Crused are they that keep money, Blessed are they who give on to me.
Oskadella69 1 year ago
There are so many stupid things you've mentioned in this video, I don't even want to get into it.. but one thing, there is a difference in camera quality from 10 miles away and from 1 block away.. "these are not the same planes" good god you are stupid.
akispines 1 year ago
in out field.......
Dragonstud 1 year ago
Black is not white? But surely it's just a matter of lighting, the way the light happens to hit planes from a certain angle? Come, you must do better than that...
weikko79 1 year ago 2
@weikko79 The maker of the film could have argued it better but it's still true. The plane in the wide angle video at 1:10 is totally black. No reflections of light whatsoever.
bobokk 1 year ago
Even if you disagree with the conclusion,
the facts remain.
Quite disturbing !
I see no unpertinences here.
If your not ready to agree, at lease, present convicing explainations for the facts.
(difficult to pretend this is forged; most of it was all on national TV)
"When you eliminate the impossible,what s left, however improbable,must be the truth" (Conan Doyle)
MrPierrePhilippe 1 year ago
Then where did the people who were in the plain (the real one) are?
faysalaaa1 1 year ago 2
@faysalaaa1 THE EVENT
drnigoa 1 year ago
@faysalaaa1 Good question. I often ask that myself. Where did the real plane and passengerz go?
1ballz08 1 year ago
@1ballz08 Yeah I really want an answer even though im 100% sure its an inside job
faysalaaa1 1 year ago
@faysalaaa1 Definitely. I agree. Oh, by the way, I came to find that part 6 (I think) of this seriez somewhat explainz what may have happened to the planes and passengerz. It getz mentioned a couple more times in the later vidz too, though it still wasn't made clear. :)
1ballz08 1 year ago
@1ballz08 yeah I sow.. thanx
faysalaaa1 1 year ago
@faysalaaa1 No problem. :)
1ballz08 1 year ago
Comment removed
faysalaaa1 1 year ago
I was late to the 911 conspiracy Demolition, but I always found it od the towers swallowed the planes whole.
sillymonkey8888 1 year ago
whats that string music? i like it
iy8686 1 year ago
Location, location, location explains why the sounds are differnent, why the plane looks different and if there are "no wings" explain the clearly visable jet engines when you pause the video. arnoldskit is right!!!! The wings ARE visable at 7:14!!!! skyarcher you are the one trying to be the brainwasher!!!!
sierrafouroneseven 1 year ago 2
whats with the computer graphics @ 2;29 or so,good CGI tho.
arnoldskit 1 year ago
good post. keep it up. pass it on!
rawkgawdez 1 year ago
stop vid at7;14 and you can see wings
arnoldskit 1 year ago
@arnoldskit sorry still no wings! god bless your eye sight
skyarcher 1 year ago 3
@skyarcher 100% no wings.
Sept11IsALie 1 year ago
@skyarcher Actually, the right wing looks blocked out by the light, and the left wing, although convincing I must add, could just be blurred. I see the blurry outline of a wing there. Once again, some of these comparisons you have are convincing, but most of them could simply be a misinterpretation. Example: the chopper in the left shot was too far away and white to see in that shine.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@skyarcher Since you mention eyesight, what's your take on the eyewitness accounts of those who were there in person on the streets watching all these ... errr .... "computer graphics" take place live?
Msunbird02 1 year ago
@Msunbird02 .... simulations... film them... get pathetic actors... watch this ... believe the crap if you want
skyarcher 1 year ago
@skyarcher I was expecting you to tell me they were all holograms implanted into the global psyche which I think would have been a more cost effective alternative. Please at least try to be serious.
Msunbird02 1 year ago
@arnoldskit i saw 2 little smudges on both sides
halopivotgta 1 year ago
wtf @ 4:38
littlebritan 1 year ago
If you look carefully through the window of floor 23 you see a scumbag long island dago getting his dick sucked by his brooklyn filthy whore secretary !!
jimmi0082001 1 year ago
nobraintheory = brokenstyx
eyecintel 1 year ago
Ha ok. Jesuit mind controller nuff respect as no.1 subscription.
skyarcher 1 year ago
Ever notice how the reaction of the people seem fake? lol
KissJustMimi 2 years ago 3
who ever made this is an idiot...maybe alot of these clips were recorded using mobile phoen camera..therefore teh image quality isnt that good...and so its blurry!!...and also not very good on frames!!!!!! it was 2 planes that hit the towers...different engine sounds due to different engine models...RR, PW, GE...now listen to some of them sound sthen listen to an american 767 and compare...then tell me what engines you think the AA 767 uses!! cause i know!!!! RETARD!!!!!!!1
FSHighDefinition 2 years ago
The footage is from the news media you eejit.
skyarcher 2 years ago 10
@skyarcher - Some is and some isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about. I just read on your page that you don't believe nuclear weapons exist, and you think there were no victims killed on 911. Your denial level is off the charts.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
@skyarcher there where vids from on the ground
gomermarbob 8 months ago
@FSHighDefinition <-----sheep. get out of our way! while we destroy NWO!!!!!!!!!!
rawkgawdez 1 year ago
at 2.50 look at the video it almost looks like a cartoon when he says unbelievable i agree what is this video of ????come on .For some good info on the pentagon watch.... security alert sensitive information.
toddholladay 2 years ago
Speed of sound is not taken into concideration (it takes sound more time to reach further distances) nor is the relfection of sound to hard surfaces (multiple impact sounds and interference which makes the sound volume lower depending on where you stand), the fact that sound volume drops off with the second power of distance.
Good video review, bad sound review.
btypirate 2 years ago
Look from 8:54 to 9:06, which is a real boeing plane, as yoy stated. When the plane is coming towards the camera man, the plane looks white. After it passes him, it looks black. It has to do with shadows. It has to do with the position of the sun. It has to do with the angle and position of the camera man. The reason the plane looks black sometimes and white other times has to do with angles and shadows. How is that not obvious to you?
Gamezero05 2 years ago
This video attempts to use logic, but fails. The first part, with the different plane colors.. first of all, they were taken with different cameras. Secondly, different angles. And third, different distances. The camera the plane is shot with and the angle and distance matter a great deal. And as far as your "steel slicing aluminum wings" comment.. you think a plane travelling at 500+ mph would just bounce off?
Gamezero05 2 years ago
Also, when the vid is paused, you can see the damn left engine. And you can see the left wing when the plane flys by the sky, NOT THE BUILDING. this occurs before the video pauses.
ihavasthma91 2 years ago
Yes you can see it, but it is a tad hard to see. It's right when the home vid freezes, if you follow the place from the right wing, which is already clear as day, to the body, then follow the same path to the left, you can absolutely see the wig. Also, if it was in fact a missile, then how can a missle make a hole that looks almost like a sword cut through. any hole i saw in the building was always like a slice, if a missle did it, then it would be one big ass hole in the middle of the building
ihavasthma91 2 years ago
those sounds are BS, too. they like an engine still powering up.. again. aand, for that departing shot you took, look where the impact is on the plane, and where the fireball shows up in the right video, the right shot wouldn't have caught, and that arrow you put on there is way too high. the right shot was closer, meaning the plane would seem lower than in the left shot, but the arrows are in the same spot, move that right shot lower, and you'll see the plane go by. there is no doubt in my mind
ihavasthma91 2 years ago
ok, when you pause it the home video 7:15, idk what everyone else is seeing, but i see two engines to either side of the main body, along with one wings. i'll admit, it is only one, however, once the video restarts, i can clearly see the left wing right before it goes into the building. now, i don't have the best vision, i do wear glasses, but if i can see, then it's obvious
ihavasthma91 2 years ago
you cant see the left wing at all. its a hologram.
patrickakapapoo 2 years ago
YES THERE IS SOUND OF THAT IMPACT!!! start at approx. 4:57 or 4:58, you hear a plane revving up it's engines until 5:01, when you hear 2 thuds, which could be the initial hit and then the tail of the plane hitting, then at 5:02, the fire and smoke start billowing out of the tower. spoiled that one, sorry
ihavasthma91 2 years ago
u do have a point about the sudden change of colour of the plane though
wrestlemania2237 2 years ago
people saw this with there own eyes??
wrestlemania2237 2 years ago
Not only that, but :30 to 1:00 show you don't understand how telephoto lenses compress a scene.
This video is a perfect example of photographic analysis being done by someone who has zero understanding of photographic concepts. This is why you shouldn't get your information from YouTube.
thedman1113 2 years ago
'telephoto lenses compress a scene' .. i like it )
nice try.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"'telephoto lenses compress a scene' .. i like it )
nice try. "
Thank you again for illustrating you are clueless when it comes to photography.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Google "telephoto lenses compress scene" and let me know if you learn anything.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Call me 'clueless' 'sad' whatever you like. Playground stuff.
You still have not explained how
1. how a supposed silver shiny object in clear visibility and drenched in sun is completely black ??
would you like to explain this?
2. How an object pictured in one tv shot is flying level into the tower and in another shot is divebombing into the tower. how in the last 5 secs b4 impact the same plane descends 500 feet AND doesnt descend 500 feet??
No diversions pls just a clear explanation.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Also, September clues is over 90 minutes long. So far you disagree with 2 of those minutes.
As for your disagreement covering these 2 mins you seem to be claiming that a plane can be simultaneously coloured black and white and that a plane can fly level and descend rapidly at the same time??
You claim these anomalies lie in the lens of a camera? Is this correct?
Do I take it you agree with the rest of presentation because you have not brought up any other issues with it??
skyarcher 2 years ago
"you seem to be claiming that a plane can be simultaneously coloured black and white"
Thanks for proving for the 12th time that you don't understand exposure.
thedman1113 2 years ago
"You claim these anomalies lie in the lens of a camera? Is this correct?"
I claim these are some of the most basic principles of photography, and you don't understand any of them.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Maybe i dont. A horse race. the winning horse crosses the line and its a white horse... but appears on tv as a black horse.
I have a video camera and do photography and can smell your rat miles away.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"I have a video camera and do photography"
You "do" photography, eh? Great! I'm a professional photographer, so we'll discuss this on a level playing field. Please discuss how a video camera using standard evaluative metering would meter 1:12 differently from 1:40. Then tell me how many stops of latitude your video camera has. Go.
"but appears on tv as a black horse."
If the surrounding environment were sufficiently bright, it would. Someone who does photography should know this.
thedman1113 2 years ago
"You still have not explained how
1. how a supposed silver shiny object in clear visibility and drenched in sun is completely black ??would you like to explain this? "
Yes I have, you just don't want to be educated on the matter. It is dark because the overall scene around it is brighter than it, and video cameras have narrow exposure latitude. You don't understand this, because you don't wish to become educated about camera exposure.
thedman1113 2 years ago
I dont wish to listen to a shill going on about nonsense actually)
'the video camera have narrow exposure latitude' !
really ?
All of the other elements of the picture seem ok. The plane itself is silver and should reflect light the way shiny objects do. It is completely black however.
Try and come up with something more convincing.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"All of the other elements of the picture seem ok."
Look at the buildings lit by the sun at 1:12 and 1:40 and tell me the difference. Then explain why, mr. photographer.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Actually the sun is behind the 'photographer' here, early enough in the morning low down in the sky on a perfectly visible day. You cannot get better photographic conditions. The 'photographer' in not shooting INTO the sun!!
and you claim to be an expert on cameras!
come on really.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Exactly where did I say the vids were shooting into the sun? Now you can't even comprehend what I write. I said "Look at the buildings lit by the sun". You do know what that means, don't you? Now quit ducking the question and explain the difference between the buildings at 1:12 and 1:40.
thedman1113 2 years ago
The building at 1:40 has no features are all. This is fake footage. The plane enters the building without slowing down. This is faked. It defies the laws physics.
The 'scene' with the buildings at 1:14 is highly suspect, which is the point of Sept clues, Tv fakery, but even still, in this 'shot' the buildings behind the plane have features, albeit cartoonish ones. The sunlight falling on the plane should make it glitter and it does not. Again, this is fake footage )
skyarcher 2 years ago
STOP spamming on this channel with your multiple profiles. take it elsewhere. People can read the comments you left under your first profile and make their own mind up thanks you.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"How an object pictured in one tv shot is flying level into the tower and in another shot is divebombing into the tower."
I've explained this as well (telephoto lenses compress scenes) but you don't want to become educated about that either. You laugh and scoff at common, basic photographic principles as though I'm making them up, which just makes you look stupid.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Again, i will let other people decide(7,000 people have watched this) who is coming over as stupid.
You did not answer me this. September clues is over 90 mins long. You have a problem with 2 of those mins. Do you agree with the rest of the presentation then?
lets hear you )
skyarcher 2 years ago
"You did not answer me this. September clues is over 90 mins long. You have a problem with 2 of those mins. Do you agree with the rest of the presentation then?"
Oh no, I'm sure I could destroy the whole thing, but we can only take this one point at a time and you still haven't gotten why the first two minutes are wrong.
thedman1113 2 years ago
I am sure you could 'destroy' the rest of it !lol
You are not doing a great job on these 2 mins though!
I like your spirit mind you.
skyarcher 2 years ago
I notice you didn't even try to answer the question about your video camera's metering. I suspect you're not the photographer you claim to be.
thedman1113 2 years ago
On my video camera I always lock the exposure as I dont want the iris to open if the scene suddenly darkens. All modern cameras have features which automatically adjust to different light settings. The fake pan shot here would be ample time for a camera to set itself up.
Your inability to answer the questions i have put to you in a reasonable way has become tiring. best of luck.
Turn off your TV. This thing can rot ones brain.
skyarcher 2 years ago
I like the effort you've put in and the detail of your analysis but it's all wrong. You're being passionately rediculous. Idon't know whether to praise you or pity you. Both I suppose. Don't lve your version of the uth so much that it blinds yo to reality.
MarkLucasTube 2 years ago
Can you explain which parts you disagree with. If you cannot don't leave incomprehensible comments on this channel.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Pls dont send me a personal message thank you. Now again... yes explain which parts of this video you disagree with and why you disagree or else get lost.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Sorry, I thought you were commenting on one of my videos - something completely different. I was "incomprehensible" because my keyboard was playing up. It was good of you, and right, to ask me what parts I disagree with. I cannot do it in this small space. You have simply misinterpreted the information in the 911 footage. You are not giving proper regard to 'perspective' and your conclusions are absurd. If you were patient I would undertake a dialogue with you. Cheers anyway.
MarkLucasTube 2 years ago
I have a lot of time. Now you can start. What part of the video presentation here by mr. simonshack regarding 'perspective' is wrong or is misinformation.
Give me a time and pls describe the way it should look. You come here claiming some sort of expertise in this field so lets hear your learned opinion.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Way to prove you skipped photography class and don't know dick about exposure.
Stupid, but that's what we've come to expect from twoofers.
thedman113 2 years ago
Good man, ignore the evidence and attack someone. Look up ad hominem and youve got it)
skyarcher 2 years ago
"Good man, ignore the evidence and attack someone."
No, I didn't ignore the 'evidence', I said the 'evidence' is a product of someone who doesn't understand photographic exposure. Try to keep up.
thedman113 2 years ago
Would you like to point out which part of this video you are talking about. Please point to the time and explain exactly what you mean.
lets hear you.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Here's a whole video on the subject:
watch?v=xg7_meg77Qw
In that video, the same woman holding a gray card is rendered both black and white, something this video says can't possibly happen, thus proving the maker of this video doesn't understand the basics of camera exposure.
thedman113 2 years ago
Pls point to the time in the video you are addressing. There are many issues raised here including the the fact that different cameras have the 'plane' approaching the building at totally contradictory angles. What exactly are you referring to?? You mention 'exposure' pls point to the part in this video where this applies?? Back up your claims or else get lost.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"Pls point to the time in the video you are addressing."
How about 1:05 to 1:55? You made the video, yet I have to remind you what you put in it. Sad.
thedman113 2 years ago
You STILL have not said what it is you have a problem with?? Is it the plane in one shot which is a black and in another shot white?? The black plane shot.. the nearside of the WTC is illuminated in sunlight .. yet the plane nearside is totally black .. terrible computer fakery. I obviously would have a different opinion about who the word 'sad' refers to.
A clear day. perfect visibility. embarrassingly bad graphic inserts . Take your fuzzy logic elsewhere.
skyarcher 2 years ago
"You STILL have not said what it is you have a problem with?"
The fact that you don't understand how a video camera pointed at the bright sky can render the plane dark, while a video camera with lots of dark shadowy buildings in the frame can render the plane white. It all has to do with camera exposure, something you have proven you don't understand.
Now you're trying to block me to avoid further embarrassment. Not something a person interested in the truth would do.
thedman1113 2 years ago
I was on Fulton Street when the second plane hit the WTC. The second plane was a silver commericial airplane. Period.
xdonzipx 3 years ago
this is the internet , we can say anything on the internet)For example, I saw a herd of elephants cartwheeling into the WTC )
yu say plane was sliver? yet here at 2.30 in this video the plane is a black blob. Very crude fake.
Tell us more ? which direction did your 'plane' come from? you claim to be a witness to the biggest mass murder in US recent history..where can i read your witness statement? please direct me )
If you cannot you are a liar.
skyarcher 3 years ago
I hadn't heard of that one!... interesting.
WodeBolder 3 years ago
OMG This video is fucking absurdly stupid!! For example, I can see with my own eyes how the angle of "magical disappearing" helicopter and buildings at the end of the video wouldn't allow you to see to helicopter at all. There's about 30 degrees of difference in that angle, they weren't similar in any respect. Turn the camera to the right 30 degrees and there's the Heli! You conspiracy nuts need to get a new hobby sheesh!
sweetbilly 3 years ago
A plane going 300 hundred miles an hour wouldn't show wings, or would only show them distorted, in a camera with a slow frame rate Duh! Man you fuckers are fucking insanely stupid! You're are right though, there is brainwashing going on, it's on YouTube! These videos are VERY disrespectful to the people who died on that day, asshole! You need to grow a heart and a conscience!
sweetbilly 3 years ago
So your saying that the 50 something video's all by TV, people, family's, that look the same relativity were ALL fake... If your saying that the TV ones were fake, what about home videos? They were fake? no? then how the HELL do you get the footage without a plane, and put fake ones in, more importantly, WHY!?
Trixfire 3 years ago
okay a missle would have demolished the entire building not jus hit that one part. n cause some smoke but actually BLOWN up the building. and out of the millions of ppl in nyc. someone wudda been like it was a missle. this shit is so stupid.
strightupjagged08 3 years ago
at 7:17 the plane does have wings.. its going too fast to see them clarly.. however if you look carefully u can see the two engines.
overall very good video.. i agree tv is a lie. u cant get anything truthfull out of it
wmmt3igor 3 years ago
che este video es una mierda.. aparte vs qien sos para decir q no fue un avion!! vs estuviste ahi??!! mira si fuiste vs el q truco todas las fotos!!?? mejor dedicate a otra cosa.. y dejale esto a los q realmente saben q paso.
xXMicky007Xx 3 years ago
there's some shaky stuff here.
one of the easiest for me to say is the comparison of missile whistles. distance and physical barriers (i.e. the walls of a recording studio) will roll off the higher harmonics of any sound (hitting a trashcan lid in front of your face as opposed to 20 away feet on the other side of a wall). the pitch discrepancy is natural, and may even provide evidence contrary to the point you're trying to make, BECAUSE they had the same decay.
dimmucoltrane890 3 years ago
Also note that "Mrs Theresa Renaud is the voice of "Bri" in the FAKE audio in "What We Saw" which is another SCAM video.
Check it out for yourselves.
The networks (all of them) were not bribed it is their job to lie. They are the mouth piece for the "official story" LIE. When have the media ever told us any truth? They are 100 percent involved. Every time some one or group challenges anything; they mock and insult.They are "public opinion" they rig every poll.
THIS IS THEIR JOB!
Rcoxx4u 3 years ago 2
Thanks Rcoxx4u for that I didnt realise they were one and the same.
Pls anyone watching this beware. TURN OFF YOUR TV. It is that simple. It is brainwashing tool number one.
skyarcher 3 years ago
I could hear the SOUND of the plane BEFORE it hits and the FIRST time I saw this vid and can clearly hear it every time afterward. How do explain that? The fact that the handheld didn't pick up the actual explosion can be due to many factors. But one things for sure. A 767 is LOUD directly overhead.
JohnnySkillish 3 years ago
the black plane was real, the rest was faked. actual eyewitness acounts said that they saw a plane, just that "that wasn't an american airlines" quoted one woman.
H8rzBware 3 years ago
Why is the black plane real?? pls explain
skyarcher 3 years ago
actually my previous comment was made before i finished your whole series so i may have been mistaken. one thing is for sure, it wasn't american airlines.
H8rzBware 3 years ago 2
Great post skyarcher....it was an inside job and the Illuminati / NWO need to be brought to justice for crimes against the American people.
CairoGang 3 years ago
i was there, 2 blocks away when it happened. i heard the whine of the 'planes', which didnt sound like ne planes ive ever heard, which was proceeded by the sound of rolling explosions. It definitely didn't seem like a plane had struck the building because there were too many seperate, rolling explosions that could be clearly heard from street level
raynofstarz 3 years ago
you also seem amazed that the lady has some kind of super vision to see a plane crash into the builinds from her long distance perspective. Take your ass on over to Sandy Hook, New Jersey and take a look at the city...You can see it perfectly on a clear day or night and that is at least 30 miles away by water! Get off this kick 9/11 is a conspiracy because it wasn't you fucking Skitzo's
gote7730 3 years ago
Gote7730 ...Joined 18 MAY VIDEOS WATCHED 17!!!...LOL..
THIS IS A CLASSIC SHILL/BITTER PERSON PROFILE.
I WILL LEAVE YOUR BITTER HATE FILLED COMMENTS UP FOR ANOTHER LITTLE WHILE -STEWING AWAY FOR ALL TO SEE IN THEIR OWN TWISTED LOGIC -BUT BLOCK U.
skyarcher 3 years ago
Can you please explain why the 2 shots of the 2nd hit in the first minute contradict each other????
getoffutube 3 years ago
why do you seem to be amazed that aluminum can cut through steel? Brass is softer than steel too and it can cut through steel too. Have you not ever fired a high powered rifle. Try a chinese version of the ak-47 7.62x39..that is a .30cal bullet and it cuts through steel too! Fucking dumbasses
gote7730 3 years ago
/watch?v=s_FPyom4gP4
skyarcher 3 years ago
WTF
gote7730 3 years ago
okay, well i stopped it at 2:38, so plz dont b mad if it explains it more later. but i dont get it, i've only watched pt. 1 of ur vids so far (great job, btw), but i dont get it. i beleive all this from the news stations and stuff, but wut about ppl's REAL videos? they got real planes. didnt they? well so i tihnk...but i just dont get it. well, now i get the whole "black plane" thing and it chainging colours and stuff. but...ugh, im so confused now. the first vid was great tho!
Ichmachtspass 3 years ago
ichmachtspass :Please watch the 911AMATEUR series (parts 1-3)on my channel. This may discard some of your confusion. Thanks.
simonshack 3 years ago