National Geographic -/ Inside Outlaw Bikers - Hell's Angels Documentary Part 2 of 5 [HQ]

[singlewing44]

those guys are so full of shit! The Dozen was Angel support for years! Hell they were in an Angels movie in the 70s- bunch of lying faggots!

[Anonyminia]

This undercover "cop" wanted to be an HA so bad it gave him wet dreams.....and messed up the entire case.

[lftugagamer]

yep the government fabricated this shit... first the guy shooting clearly appears looking at a hiding camera at 6h40... just coincidence? dont believe in coincidences... this seams 2 fabricated... and btw why they dont talk about the mongols? they killed 2 hells angels...

[fendermanjazz1960]

all bike clubs are stupid. a very childish attitude to life. and most people who join them, join because they have no other friends, or for protection.

[cb7pwn]

these undercover men are some of the bravest mothers around .. imagine what would happen to one of them if they got caught

[misterCLASSACT]

The guy with the troat cancer looks like the white gary coleman LOL

[turner593]

the 1% ers are looking a heck of alot better these days in the stark reality of how fn corrupt our government is .

[jenoo75]

@keir193 LOLOL -Awesome.

[HGPL11]

As Shaffer looks at the hidden cam @6:39....

[Roof]

fucking rats!

[thedivekid78]

is this henry rollins voice!

[BillyBaddAzz1]

FUCK J DOBYNS HE'S A WEAK ASS SNITCH THAT CANT EVEN GET THE JOB OF BEING A RAT COMPLETED THIS PUSSY SHOULD HAVE BEEN HANDED OVER TO 81 FOR THE BULLSHIT HE DID..SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL 1%ERS

[MrBroekschijter]

ATF RULES !

[keir193]

what angles are you retards talking about? acute? obtuse? how you gonna pretend to be a 81 supporter if youc an't even spell angels lolol

[iHacksorzz]

Waka was shittin himself infront of a real gang member. All this fake gangsta bullshit disappeared.

[12onlyusernameleft34]

How do you get a job working for the cops and your job description is to do drugs as the "dirty man". I wonder what that resume looks like haha.

[davejones8]

the police are more corrupt then the HA. you should see what they do,,,,think if the HA was that bad tate and all his family would be dead...thats how bad gangstas get down

[stone8675309]

dobbins is all ego



[69stringibanez]

they should put undercover cops in police precencts

[rockinallday25]

Hell yeah sonny is awesome!his great in sons of anarchy

[jcyte7]

SO fucking sick how they got Sonny to be in Sons of Anarchy.

[Redsage1122]

@JuggaloCirqueDuFreak Outlaw

[TembaSaggicorn]

@silver760: Intentionally mispronouncing someone's name is a sure-fire way to show disrespect.

[thehotshirtguy2008]

Jay Dobbins dresses like a total tool. I wouldn't trust anything he says.

[A1Cvenom]

i'd trust a 1%er over anyone in congress...



[MrCrazyh81]

they all should be shot dead or put in a cell with no bed window or light and just leave em there 2 rot

[essexfreak]

I read the Jay Dobyns book - pile of crap, totally unprofessional and he'd be slotted if it were all true



[oldredun]

he should be binned anyway for being such cock . . . he was living the life, should've quit the pigs, quit the Big Red Machine and quit life . . . . there's something super slimy and morally bankrupt about him and that style of "law enforcement", what a joke, like fucking Sons of Anarchy, a fabrication

[vikingsbeard]

5:56 pink floyd poster, fuck aye

[MasKistershi]

Funny how the last ex undercover guy is showen clearly and then when he speaks it's in a darkened room as if they won't to protect his identity- bit late

[MrGoldfish1984]

that cop with the hat is a fucking tool

[Redsage1122]

OFFO 1%er

[JakeLWright]

@marcjf

Actually, you're the keyboard commando.

"I'd prefer to sit on my computer and rant than actually do anything."

I personally love America and think a rebellion is a silly idea, but if you actually feel strongly about it-ranting online gets you nowhere. Also, using his insults out of context just makes you look like a jackass who doesn't know what he's talking about.

How about you submit a bill or start a protest?

[antidiz]

Cool Man..

[westcoastfrisco]

notice agent Dobins is wearin a red and white bandanna

[iParatrooper]

I think it is so cool that you can get a patch for catching a STD!!!! Awesome!!! 

[MichaelHansenFUN]

1:06 must be sonnys oakland house with a gate.

[pdgb101548]

so thats how gta got A.O.D

[cockmaster7000]

@Friday13thTaurus say that to are face

[submissive2Master]

@Friday13thTaurus they aren't.

[SOULECKZ]

dont believe the hype -FEDERAL FABRICATED CRIMES!!! ............SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL 1%ERS....

[singlewing44]

@SOULECKZ right on Brother!

[a90zx]

I personally think that the Hells Angels are a true statement of whats left of democracy in america,sure some of the things they do aren't nessicarly wonderful or anything but they are living the way they want to without the interferance of the government and now they want to take them away. Interesting how everything that threatens the governments power must be shut down.

[ILoveyssup]

RIDE HARD LONG LIVE HELL'S ANGLES 81's for life

[12valvepower1]

@Friday13thTaurus just bring down the american soldiers who die so these guys can rob the country.

it is sad we die so they can do this.

[12valvepower1]

these are scary guys man .

[oto24680]

@Friday13thTaurus

edzackly

some just fun riders who chill but others get dirty

i guess if they are a gang they get a bit carried away and cause crimes.

[dranterbg]

i dont give a fig about mohammed mossadegh im here to watch hells angels so please fuck off

[Marcfj]

@dranterbg That would be Hells Angels with a capital “H” and a capital “A” you silly ignoramus.

[BirdstoneDillon]

one thing i'm wondering is how these undercovers arent dead.

[darkwolfdv]

@BirdstoneDillon

because criminals tend to be pussies who don't have the guts to face the people who hate them.

[ausloverxo]

@BirdstoneDillon those wouldnt be their real names on this vid

[JohnACorp782]

@BirdstoneDillon Protective custody?

[bursa128]

stupid people

[SuperLosman]

there nice to people that don't fuck with them that's why you don't fuck with them, like for example they bought a coke for one of my friends and then you got the people who fuck with them like the mongalos and they get shot at. simple as that

[aybruzzyb]

Angels Forever, Forever Angels.

-South Australia AFFA

[Deguinn555]

Support your local HELLS ANGELS 81

[PepsiPope]

Where can I sign up?

[Froward69]

@Friday13thTaurus I do... Featherheads like to paint a picture of respectability... when the respect is born out of fear. respect must be earned, not forced. as the HA HA's insist upon you respecting them as they steal everything you have. 

[Marcfj]

“They will commit any crime that they need to commit”? Give me a fucking break! That’s a perfect description of the United States government. After all, it was the C.I.A. that overthrew the democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and replaced it with a criminal dictatorship that tortured, terrorized, and murdered the Iranian people so American and British oil companies could steal Iran’s oil. We know who the real gangsters are.

[TheDaleDenton]

@Marcfj exactly man. these guys are almost like the good guys. and yet they call them menaces to society because they don't wanna be fuckin sheeps and lay down for this fucked up, highly judge mental society like 99% of the world.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj that may be so, but that doesn't mean that it isn't true.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds Get real! It wasn’t the Hells Angels who surrounded the Branch Davidians compound in Waco Texas and killed more than twenty innocent children. And it wasn’t the Hells Angels who hid in the bushes up on Ruby Ridge and gunned down an innocent woman as she stood in the doorway of her own home while holding her small baby.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj buddy, I'm not arguing the fact that the CIA and other government branches are evil adn commit crimes, bad ones. But that doesn't change the fact that biker gangs are ruthless. What are you trying to say...? That biker gang members aren't dangerous people? Or only CIA government agents are evil. I'm confused.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds Apparently you did not read my first comment. Please note what I wrote in between the quotation marks. Now, that having been said, what I am saying is that unlike the F.B.I. and the B.A.T.F., and the C.I.A. the Hells Angels will not commit any crime.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj ok, but they still murder innocent people, killing prison guards, blowing up cars when children are present. yes, CIA= one huge gang but the bikers will still do most anything. Now mind you, I'm just going by what I learn from our governments so who knows what is true and false. but violence is the norm, hgardcore violence. What wouldn't a biker do? you seem to be know, or have an idea rather about what their limits are.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds Seriously, do you know of one case where the Hells Angels deliberately killed an innocent child? The Feds did it up on Ruby Ridge and it wasn’t an accident. After they murdered Randy Weaver’s innocent wife they ambushed his fourteen year old son and shot him in the back and murdered him too.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj Daniel Desrochers, 11 years old. Playing by a truck when it was blown up.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds That does NOT answer the question! The loss of a child is a tragedy but as far as I know there was no deliberate attempt made by anyone to kill Daniel Desrochers. The target appears to have been a drug dealer by the name of Marc Dube.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj yeah but why not wait? Also, it's just your opinion they didn't intentionally kill him, they very well might of.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds You’re missing the point! I did not say they did not kill him, I said there was NO deliberate attempt made by anyone to kill him. Now, by contrast, the FEDS deliberately killed Randy Weaver’s 14 year old son and the boy’s mother was well. Therefore, the FEDS showed intent, whereas, those who killed the Desrochers boy did not.

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj yeah, I understand. My opinion is it was intentional, yours is it wasn't. I never said you dispute that they killed him. But why do you think that it was just an accident? I know they didn't target Daniel, so yes they didn't seek him out to kill him, but they didn't have to. They could just shot the biker, no shrapnel involved. Some may argue that they didn't intentionally kill him and some would argue the did, I believe the latter. I'm not trying to anger you.

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds Okay, the Bottom-line is you do NOT know of a single case where the Hells Angels deliberately killed an innocent child. Your opinion that they did does not make it a fact. Therefore, you have thus far failed to prove your case. Keep Trying! 

[ontariobuds]

@Marcfj No, I don't know of a case where you can say that they targeted a child.  The same goes for your argument, you're just saying they didn't. can you prove it? neither of us can. I didn't prove my point...that's not the end of the world for me. Is that how you talk when debating with somebody in person? "you failed to prove your case, keep trying". you sound very self centered, like 'I'm the smartest and you're not"

I could be wrong though, but if that is how you debate? no thanks!

[Marcfj]

@ontariobuds Sorry, but it doesn’t work that way. Here in the United States of America the burden of proof is upon the accuser. Therefore, I need not prove they didn’t, whereas, you need to prove they did. Regarding your getting personal with me; I can only respond by telling you that such tactics are most often employed by females and effeminate males when they find themselves on the losing end of a debate.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

So there is no case where they "deliberately" killed a child? How about accidentally? That in and of itself would be worthy of condemnation. So you're saying they didn't DELIBERATELY kill a child, but they have killed children accidentally? Also, weren't there cases of Hells Angels selling drugs to minors (i.e. children)? So your position would be "Hells Angels don't kill children deliberately. But they do accidentally. And they do sell drugs to children." ?

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv Are you being deliberately stupid or are you just missing a chromosome? Whatever the case may be, you are at the very least intellectually dishonest. Tell me, how does it automatically equate that if I said, “They didn’t deliberately kill a child that they “killed children accidentally”? That having been said, you’re obviously trying to twist things around like a frustrated female because you lack the intellectual faculties for rational debate.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

A) If the "government" stole the oil, why would they give it to the oil companies? Why wouldn't the government keep the oil and sell it itself? B) If we "stole" the oil, how come we're paying $4/gallon for it? So you're saying that if we DIDN'T steal it, the price of gas would be LOWER? All I'm interested in is paying less for gas when I fill up my tank in the morning. So your position is that if we DIDN'T steal it, it would be CHEAPER? That seems counter-intuitive.

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv If you had taken just a few moments of your time to do a little research on the subject of Mohammed Mossadegh, and his democratically elected government, you wouldn’t be asking me such stupid questions. That having been said; if you’re too fucking lazy to educate yourself then don’t expect me to do it for you. After all, it’s really your responsibility, not mine.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

A) If the "government" stole the oil, why would they give it to the oil companies? Why wouldn't the government keep the oil and sell it itself? B) If we "stole" the oil, how come we're paying $4/gallon for it? So you're saying that if we DIDN'T steal it, the price of gas would be LOWER? All I'm interested in is paying less for gas when I fill up my tank in the morning. So your position is that if we DIDN'T steal it, it would be CHEAPER? That seems counter-intuitive.

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv Answer: Because the United States government acts on behalf of the oil companies just as it does on behalf of the pharmaceutical companies. As for my position; it is simply this…had we not overthrown the democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and installed a brutal dictatorship we would not be having the problems today that we are currently having with Iran. Now, do your own homework and stop asking stupid questions.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj That's absurd, your alleging that the U.S government gets its hands dirty for a private corporation? LOL! That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Now to say it would get it hands dirty for it's own personal gain that would be believable although you'd still have to prove it. What your saying isn't even remotely believable.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites You’re either being deliberately stupid or you’re just missing a chromosome…which is it?

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Is Elvis alive as well? I bet you think the holocaust didn't happen and the twin towers were brought down by some Illuminati conspiracy?

Lol you crack me up. Insulting me for lack of answer is pathetic.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites I see you’re attempting to twist things around to suit your own ends just like a frustrated school girl. Therefore, for the record, I’m insulting you for being intellectually dishonest and willfully ignorant. After all, it’s no secret that the C.I.A. was instrumental in the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh and his democratically elected government and replacing him with a thug who allowed British and American oil companies to steal Iran’s oil. Do your homework then get back to me!

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Again, insults for lack of content. That sounds like, like something a school girl might resort to, lol.

In relation to your comment I didn't claim anything to the contrary, notice you have clearly changed what you said. I laughed at your conspiracy theory that the U.S government was doing the dirty work for private corporations. I don't care about mohammed mossedegh or iran in general, maybe you've had your head up your own ass for so long you can't smell your own bullshit.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites “Lack of content”???? Are you actually implying that your previous comment about Elvis being alive, the holocaust being a hoax, and the Twin Towers being brought down by an Illuminati conspiracy contained subject matter worthy of my attention? GOOD GRIEF! What a dumbass. LOL

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj I'm not the one making the extraordinary claim therefore I don't need to have a mass of content.

My mention of those things was to point out how similar they are in their nature, being ridiculous conspiracy theories.

Notice again you have avoided the main bulk of my last comment,, by bringing up a comment you've already replied to.

Here's a bit of advice, this is a video about Hells Angels drop your dumbass conspiracy claims somewhere else, where people give a shit.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites “I'm not the one making the extraordinary claim”??? Of course you are! You’re “extraordinary” claim is that the United States government did not overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh’s democratically elected government for the intended purpose of allowing British and American oil companies to steal Iran’s oil. Now, here’s a bit of advice for you; don’t become involved in a debate unless you’ve done your homework on the subject. In that way you won't look like the ignoramus that you are.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Oh wow I didn't claim they didn't overthrow anyone, I just said they wouldn't work for the gain of private corporations. There is no debate because you have no proof. Just assertions.

You keep talking about homework yet you have cited 0 evidence, pull your head out your ass. Your insults don't make up for your lack of evidence.

:) Your actually quite funny I wonder how many more comments it'll take before I actually hear a case for what your claiming, not just the claim.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites you really and truly just don’t get it, do you? I’m NOT the guy who is disputing history, YOU ARE! Therefore, the burden of proof is upon you to prove your contention that the United States government did not work for the private gain of American oil interests in Iran back in 1953 when the CIA overthrew Iran’s democratically elected government.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Lol you don't believe that do you?

I'm not making a positive claim therefore the burden of proof is on you. That's like me saying that unicorns exist until you PROVE they don't. You have to establish that it is history, asserting that it is so doesn't make it fact.

You are an imbecile if you believe that the burden of proof doesn't fall on the person making the positive claim. :)

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Are you being deliberately stupid again or are you just missing a chromosome? AN HISTORICAL FACT IS NOT A CLAIM and need not be established as history because it already is. If I state that the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 for the intended purpose of crippling the U.S. Navy’s Pacific fleet then I am making a statement of fact and not a claim. If you assert that the Japanese didn’t bomb Pearl Harbor then you are making a claim. Do you get it now?

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj A historical fact is something that has been established as true, therefore citing evidence should be easy. Taking the pearl harbor example you could easily direct me to a source on the Internet which verifies it as true. But you seem unable or just too retarded to realize what I'm asking to cite ANY evidence that what your claiming is true, or established historical fact.

Are you genuinely this stupid?

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites “Are you genuinely this stupid?” That’s a strange comment given the fact that it is coming from a guy who has Google at his fingertips and still can’t find any information on the C.I.A.’s involvement in the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh. LOL

Seriously, if you’re having a problem finding the information that you want then get an older sister, brother, parent, friend (if you have any) or guardian to help you.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj So no you can't cite any evidence then? Lol if it is so easy why haven't you cited ANYTHING?

I never contested that the C.I.A didn't overthrow mohanned mossadegh. I pointed out that it is illogical to assert that the U.S government would launch an operation like that for the gain of a private corporation.

Your a bit slow on this aren't you I've repeated myself several times.

Your lack of ability to produce even 1 source to back up your claims is testament to it's invalidity.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites GOOD GRIEF! YOU'RE DUMBER THAN A SACK OF POTATOES! Once again, I am NOT the one making any claims, YOU ARE. Your assertion, that the United States government did not overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh for the financial benefit of the oil industry, is in complete conflict with established historical fact. Therefore, you have made a claim and for that very reason the burden of proof is upon you.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Lol. Unestablished historical fact? Self contradicting don't you think? Your an imbecile. Unless your citing sources that establish your claims then don't bother replying. Reply with the same idiocy you've repeated the last 10 comments and I'll just ignore you..

You said it is easy to prove right? Link me a couple of sources then. Because you keep evading my request for evidence and just asserting that it is a historical fact. It's kinda funny actually

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites I think it might be a good idea for you to learn the difference between 'Your" and "You're" before you call somebody an "imbecile". LOL 

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Pointing out a minor grammatical error because you cannot cite a single source? Your weak mate.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Oh come now! Are you so mentally incompetent that you can’t even go to Google and type in "Mohammed Mossadegh" and hit the “Enter” key? Speaking of “weak”, it would seem that you’re a little more than weak-minded.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj So no you can't cite evidence?

Or even more humorous your only evidence is a google search? LOL funny guy.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites I hope you don't mind my asking; but, are you by any chance a female? I only ask because it seems to me that you would rather personalize, which is feminine, than engage in serious and objective debate, which is masculine. I say this because it has become more than obvious that you would rather direct yourself at me than you would my argument.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj My username starts with "mr"?

I have been asking repeatedly for you to cite evidence I am being objective.

On the other hand you are implying I am female knowing full well I am not, as an indirect somewhat underhand insult. Pretty much being exactly what your comment accuses me of being.

If you have replied to me this many times without realizing the "mr" in my username you are either exceptionally un observant, or semi blind.

Again you evade citing any evidence.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Where’s YOUR evidence to back up YOUR CLAIM that the United States government did NOT overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh and the democratic government of Iran to benefit British and American oil interests? Remember, I merely mentioned what is an established historical fact, whereas, you made a CLAIM that challenges the authenticity of such historical fact. Therefore, it is your responsibility to prove your claim is the truth.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Where’s YOUR evidence to back up YOUR CLAIM that the United States government did NOT overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh and the democratic government of Iran to benefit British and American oil interests? Remember, I merely mentioned what is an established historical fact, whereas, you made a CLAIM that challenges the authenticity of such historical fact. Therefore, it is your responsibility to prove your claim is the truth.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Where’s YOUR evidence to back up YOUR CLAIM that the United States government did NOT overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh and the democratic government of Iran to benefit British and American oil interests? Remember, I merely mentioned what is an established historical fact, whereas, you made a CLAIM that challenges the authenticity of such historical fact. Therefore, it is your responsibility to prove your claim is the truth.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj My evidence is your lack thereof. There is no other evidence possible to prove a negative, excluding contrary evidence which I never claimed I had.

You've still not cited any sources to show it is historical fact.

Therefore you are still not citing any evidence.

Your so slow it's ridiculous. I never said that they didn't overthrow mohamed mossadegh. I said it would be stupid to believe that the U.S would launch an operation like that for the gain of a private corporation.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites Apparently you have a serious problem with reading comprehension. Therefore, carefully reread what I wrote and stop wasting my time. I have no patients for those who are willfully ignorant and refuse to educate themselves. After all, any halfwit, including you, is capable of using Google. In fact, you could have even typed in “Mohammed Mossadegh” on your YouTube search bar and gotten loads of information on the oil companies and their involvement in the overthrow of Mossadegh.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Again you haven't cited any evidence.

You sound like you are personalizing? Feminine?

More to the point if it is so easy why have you not listed a single site? or link? Most normal people would take joy in proving someone wrong yet you seem content to spend more time insulting my intelligence than actually staying on topic. If you channeled that time you use to belittle me into citing evidence you might make a better case.

Still no evidence, so you have no argument.

[Marcfj]

@mrgejwaites LOL… once again; I am not the one who is disputing established historical fact, you are. Therefore, it is your responsibility to present evidence that would prove your ridiculous claim.

[mrgejwaites]

@Marcfj Historical fact you cannot provide evidence for? Even while proclaiming how easy it is to find the evidence.

No evidence, no debate my proof in relation to this debate is your inability to provide positive evidence. Have a nice day.

[Sithemp11]

@mrgejwaites I fallowed this conversation, im not from the U.S.A, but i well know the history of M. Mossadegh that is learned everywhere around the world, and i can defenitivly conclude after everything you said that you are incredibly stupid; sorry for my bad english.

[mrgejwaites]

@Sithemp11 Ok, all I'm asking for is one link to show that the U.S government overthrew mohammed mossadegh FOR THE BENEFIT OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION.

I put the last bit in capitals because that is the part that I really contested. If it is such world knowledge why waste your time writing an insulting comment when you could simply post a link to prove me wrong and I'd happily admit I was mistaken?

[12valvepower1]

hells angels or terrorists. you decide.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

It sounds to me that what you're saying is that the US government is the brutal dictatorship. So why aren't you working toward the overthrow of the US government? If you really had the balls to back up your beliefs, you would be actively working to bring the US government down, and fight against it. Anything else is just a lot of blather on your part. "The US govt does this, it does that, blah blah". Well quit talking and get rid of it! Or are you too busy fucking your sister?

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv I can’t help but wonder, given your intellectual ineptitude and fascination with sister brother sexual relationships, if you aren’t the product of such an incestuous affair. Seriously, you need to learn how to debate properly because your mindless ranting will serve to impress no one other than your own simpleminded self. Regarding the U.S. government; I’ll continue to battle it within the confines of the law. Thank you very much!

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

Hey shithead-- A) I don't come online to debate, especially not on Youtube. Only an idiot would expect a "debate" on Youtube. I came here to ridicule idiots like yourself. That I have done, in spades. B) You came on youtube to "impress" people?? Ypu are pathetic!  C) "battle it within the confines of the law" a translation of that is "I'm a pussy and I don't have the courage of my convictions". Imagine a member of the French resistance saying "I'll battle the Nazis under the

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

confines of Nazi law" or the founders of the US saying "we'll only fight the British under their laws" pathetic! If you actually believed the US government was evil, criminal, and overthrowing countries, you would without hesitation take up arms and fight against it, in a real sense. But, you don't. That means you are a pathetic ARMCHAIR fighter, otherwise known as a chickenhawk, you aren't willing to put your life on the line. The only "fighting" you will be doing is jacking off.

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv GOOD GRIEF! You make reference to me as being pathetic, when, in fact, you’re the very same individual who fantasized about me having sex with my own sister and jacking off. Seriously, real men don’t talk that way …not if they have any honor.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

A) You ARE pathetic B) Your sexual habits have nothing to do with me, don't blame me for that! C) You're still a pussy. D) You wouldn't know the meaning of the word honor, because if you did, you would know that honor has nothing to do with sexual activities. So go fuck yourself.

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv That is absolutely correct; my sexual practices have nothing to do with you. Therefore, for the life of me, I can’t understand why you felt the need to post your perverted sexual fantasies about me here on YouTube. Perhaps it would be in your own best interest to seek psychiatric help. Good luck!

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

You're still a pussy.

[Marcfj]

@darkwolfdv Well, we can’t all be keyboard commandos like you.

[roberth214]

@Marcfj yes, the other guy is a fucking prick, I will give you that. But keep in mind, that it is within the confines of the supreme law, the constitution, to dissolve the executive branch under some circumstances.

[darkwolfdv]

@Marcfj

1) You failed to answer my questions, so I shall repost them below. 2) I frankly don't give a damn who the CIA, or any other organization, overthrows.

[Lostfaith1980]

@Marcfj Your forgetting the modern politicians who are taking bribes from big business in the form of party donations in order for favours from the corrupt politicians. This is the modern US government and it's only getting worse. Their not representing the people anymore if they ever did, they represent their own and their clients bottom line. Thats it.