Added: 5 years ago
From: lynxland
Views: 47,481
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @chadley6916

    8===) 0-:

  • It's safe to assume that when something blows up, some type of explosive was used.

  • @CBR11X

    nothing blew up ya tool...it's called a collapse...

  • @chadley6916 Since when do skycrapers collapse? You moron.

  • @Xendrius

    Are you serious?! Since when do they collapse? They collapse when jet aircraft run into them. Have you been in a closet for the last 10 years or what? Oh yeah, that would make you the "moron"

  • @chadley6916 If demolition companies could make skycrapers collapse in onthemselves smoothly at freefall speed they would save alot of explosives and just blow up the upper floors to let the upper weight crush the rest, you idiot.

  • @Xendrius

    Wow, I guess u really are a special brand of stupid. You are not accounting for the impact of the JET! Nobody said you could just blow up the upper floors to create collapse. This is obviously above you, and I'm sure you haze ZERO engineering knowledge in your background. I can't debate with someone who is ignorant about the subject.

  • @chadley6916 Honetsly you really are stupid but it isnt a suprise for anyone who believes something impossible such as buildings collapsing to dust from fire, do you have any idea what I was trying to say there? What is more devestating and more likely causing "collapse", a plane hitting it and then somehow floors slowly buckeling and causing the upper weight to crush the rest or simply "wishing 2-3" floors away with explosives letting it fall down as if you removed all the impact floors?

  • @Xendrius Consider that an underground nuclear device planted below these high-rise buildings would be capable of performing just such a demolition. It would also be virtually silent and it would pulverize the entire structure (up to about 1000 feet) almost instantaneously and turn it into a fine dust allowing for the in-tact top floors to fall down onto itself at almost free fall speed. Hmmm, sound familiar?

  • @sorcerykid Doubt nuclear tech was used, it was simply a top down demolition, a scripted detonation with milliseconds apart between each floor detonation. The contents were forcefully blown outwards, some pieces flying faster than freefall, and pyroclastic dust being formed, thermite incendiaries together with RDX is what probably took it down.

  • @Xendrius Please explain how and why they would go through the enormous effort required to demolish a building using "top down demolition" when even back in the 1970s standard demolition was known not to be economically feasible for 1300ft+ skyscrapers and hence why the towers were fitted with thermonuclear charges purpose-built for their demolition as is on-record per the USA-USSR peacible underground nuclear testing treaty. That sounds even more complicated that the "no planes theory".

  • @Xendrius Also for the record consider that "ground zero" in every dictionary prior to 2001 meant only one thing: "place at which an atomic or hydrogen bomb explodes". Feel free to look it up at your local library archives :) It is absolutely no coincidence the term was officially chosen for the disaster site of the WTC.

  • @CBR11X Look up the definition of "ground zero" in any dictionary dated pre-2001 for a clue about how the buildings actually collapsed ;)

  • @sorcerykid That's a definite possibility mate. What type of explosive can pulverise 200 000 tonnes of concrete and steel into dust within a few seconds?

  • bin laden is just a hoax

  • You see a building can not pancake from a down ward force from the top at free fall speed so the next question is who blew it and how?!

  • Hay hay this should sort things out!

    Q:- which should hit the ground first a golf ball or a ping pong ball ?

  • a plane hitting the top of a building can totally make explosions happen at the lower supports. it's totally doable. darn terrorists, getting past our NORAD system by catching us while we're busy in training exercises. let's bomb their villages and take their oil. but let the media portray them as murderous muslim...heathens...and us as the good guy christians in this..crusade..or we're all screwed.

  • guess when there is serious evidence to be shown the CIA get their geeks on to it fast... most of us are waking up to the fact that the US government has been bought long ago and that the CIA has been controlled by international organizations for years intent on world domination... but if you geeks feel ok using your intelligence to support the Eugenics campaign.. i guess your hoping they have a spot for you in their bunkers..

  • People in the truth movement believe that Dr. Griffin and Dr. Jones believe what they are spewing. They dont, they are making their living off of the Truthers, you buy there books, DVD's, go to the lectures, donate. They wont ever stop with their theories untill the last penny dries up, mark my words. There is a reason there is not National outrage over the Sept 11 attacks. Because we know a plane hit the Pentagon. And you guys saying it didnt happen just makes you look crazy and stupid.

  • Wow! You must be the only person who saw the plane in the pentagon.

    Can you show me how a boeing made a 9 foot hole in the pentagon and DISSAPEARED?

  • @79Sarwar I guess you forgot about the 136 Witnesses who saw the plane smash into the Pentagon...Remember, it was right next to the highway.....But you dont want to have your liitle theory destroyed by something like Eyewitnesses or Physical Evidence.....go to Debunking 9/11 136 witnesses to the pentagon...also do a search for Pentagon Plane parts...but it has been my experience that anyone STUPID enough to buy into a NO PLANE THEORY is too stuipid to critically evaluate evidence.

  • @JPPolachek

    My friend, you have NO idea of Geo-Politics whatsoever.

  • @79Sarwar the 9 foot hole you speak of was on the C-ring (3 rings inwards one of which was blast resistant to modern standards - more than enough to shatter plane components - except the landing gear which is one of the heaviest and well built sections of the planes - which is what caused that hole.

    Read Debunking 911 Myths by Popular Science (you know - the experts with over 100 years of journalistic science-based experience who also interviewed other field specific experts).

  • @79Sarwar

    Except that would not help your sensationalist viewpoint so I doubt you will. That's if you are even literate enough to understand it instead of being spoonfed your info from biased douchebag college kids like Dylan Avery and his special ed friend Jason Bermas.

    And if all you believe to be true is real - WTF are you still doing in this country? shouldn't you be hiding in your tinfoil hat and bubblewrap spacesuit waiting for the New Order to strike?

    Fcuking loosers make me ROFLMFAO

  • @negativeindustrial

    Nice try but i think im with the scientist and physicists on this one.

    Talk your nonsense to someone that will buy your garbage.

    I would highly recommend you watch the the short film Slavery by consent.

    It would give you a bigger picture.

    Unless you happen to be an fbi agent whos paid to come on youtube and debunk facts.

  • @79Sarwar

    Dumbass - didn"t you read what I just wrote? The VAST majority of scientists and end engineers [WHich I myself happen to be] completely disagree with you and your frat-punk boyfriend's "theories". You are being spoon-fed nonsense by people who make money off perpetuating a blatantly false conspiracy.

    why do you think they need so many revisions to that POS "documentary" Loose Change? Because they are consistantly proven wrong.

    STFU until you get a real education.

    Douchebag

  • @negativeindustrial

    So according to you, the "vast majority" of scientists and end engineers believe that jet fuel can collapse a building? Even when thermite was found in large quantities of samples, and let's not forget about those pools of molten steel. Newsflash: Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, much less keep it molten for weeks. Guess what does? Yep, thermite. Guess what thermite can be used as? Yep, an explosive.

    You aren't an engineer or a scientist, you're a joke.

  • @AirForceStar

    Actually I AM an Engineer and I happen to be at work right now reading your dumbass uneducated comment and getting paid good money while replying back to you. I work in the Oil/Gas Industry so the next time you are at the gas pumps wondering why your gas prices are so high - please remember that I was here contributing to your high gas prices by replying to you and watching youtube videos and not producing ATM. :)

    Newsflash(s) for you:

    -Structural steel does not have to melt to

  • @negativeindustrial

    (Cont.)

    loose it's ability to hold up the enourmous weight of the floors above. If you had a real education this concept would not be lost on you.

    -Thermite was NOT found on steel samples. Sulfer and other chemicals were which COULD be from theremite reactions. However, it's alot more likely it was from the enormous amounts of pulverized drywall found within the towers construction - Another concept which is probably lost on you since you have made your conclusions and

  • @negativeindustrial

    (Cont.)

    are now looking for selective evidence to back up your crackpot theory while ignoring the other facts before you (A classic example of CT reverse scientific method research).

    No my disillusioned friend - it is quite obvious that it is YOU who are the joke.

    Have a nice day

  • @negativeindustrial your a engineer? what company do you work for? name the buildings you helped build and the head architech that helped build it

  • MrBoredatwork than tell me this please why did the pentagon only release a short blurry video of the pentagon strike when it has more surveillance cameras than any other building around? and why did they confinscate all other videos from surrounding businesses like the Citgo gas station? things that make you go hmmmm??

  • Inside job. May every kike who financially benefitted from these deaths and that of the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan burn forever in hell..

  • "Nothing has done more damage to America's place in the world than the revelation that this nation stretched the law and the bounds of executive power to authorize torture and cruel treatment," said Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

  • So don't be so naive as to instantly dismiss things just because of a populated picturesqe view of the government. There's a lot going on behind the scenes that for noble and not so noble reasons they simply can't allow the public to know.

    Kind of like a parent protecting their child. Except in some instances that influence and power is misguided, misused and abused with bad intent.

  • Why did the 1st building not collapse like a the 2nd. A plane crash alone couldn't cause the collapse of a supremely powerfully constructed steel building.

    People INSIDE the building said they FELT explosions beneath them.

    Eye witnesses said they saw explosions happening.

    Also, on the close-up video you can see a white hot substance dripping down the building. This is molten material created from thermite. An explosive elemant.

  • Look, I know you not a truther. But please do more reading before you throw out random non true statements. Your kinda hurting those of us that do read whats going on.

  • sry my bad i meant 500 mph, and the sway part i should have specified as swayed a little, and i shouldve put tht it was a plane and fire, thanks for pointing tht out, kinda made me look like a dumbass lol

  • lol all buildings are designed to go back and forth about 6-12 feet in the wind if u knew simple construction work.

  • 900mph??? THE AIRLINER WENT 900MPH? rofl dude thats almost 2 times the speed of sound dont be such a fuckin idiot it was only going about 400mph

  • hey dumbass read the other comment. and im rotfl with your nwo bullshit

  • Idiot! EVERY skyscraper in the world is made to sway. Fuck some of you are stupid. And the planes were going 550-600km'h tops!

  • but they arent made to just shake off being hit by a fucking plane! man youre fucking stupid, 550 MPH not KM

  • LoL Yes, because I travel in both Canada(KMH) and U.S.A.(MPH) and mixed up my K and M, I must be a complete fraudulent idiot LMAO They obviously can take a plane hit, they did on 9/11 and IT didn't knock them over! They fell because the columns/core gave way due to heat. And that heat DID NOT come from a kerosene fire, or burning office furniture, it just doesn't burn hot. Small explosives combined with Nano Thermite, which when exploded, literally eats through metal as it moltenizes it, did it!

  • you are a dumbass. look up the patent for nanothermite, there isnt one so it technically doesnt exist. you dont need it to weaken steel, u need jet fuel some fire and a plane going 500 mph

  • Nano Thermite contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Dumb ass!

  • Why did WTC#7 fall to the ground in 6.5 seconds....

  • learn to count, watch a live video and notice that a piece of the building caves in (which happened to be a main support column)... go ahead start counting it should be anywhere from 12-18 seconds depending on how fast u count

  • I noticed that WTC#7 fell completely to the ground in less than 6.5 seconds. Do you work for the Gov. If not you can have a job.

  • Excuse me, it took around 14 seconds, You just refuse to count the corner penthouse which collapsed 5 seconds before the rest of the structure collapsed. So why dont you count the penthouse huh, it obviously involved and part of the process that causes the entire building to come down...And you silly TRUTHERS wonder how NIST has the Nerve to say the collapse took around 16 secounds or something like that..... check out on youtube WTC 7 collapse,, or is it WTC #7 collapse,,,check em out...

  • 6.5 seconds came from your side... And why don't they show us the film footage of the Pentagon? Not just the one that they released. You are silly for believing the false story, just like I was until I seen and heard a ton footage. I didn't want to think they let something like this happen. But you must really investigate everything. Like the guy that denied 14 of the highjackers Visa's and they came back with Visa's approved by the CIA.

  • #1- They both collapsed in a pancake collapse due to steel trusses failing due to exposure to heat. Both the same.

    #2. When 1 acre each floors fall on top of each other I bet it sure as hell would feel LIKE an explosion.

    3#. There were numerous transformers in the building. Search youtube for what a transformer looks like exploding. Looks alot like some flashes and an explosion.

    #4-Noone from EITHER side can prove what the substance was. However it is believed to be Aluminum. Read up.

  • @EnemaBaseMyBumPlz

    Do the genepool a favor and don't breed please - we don't need anymore like you.

    Or at the very least - move to the Middle East where they will welcome you as you deserve - with your eventual torture and beheading on live TV. If the left on your tinfoil hat for the video I and many others would finally find a reason to applaude your efforts and theirs.

    Have a fcuked dayasshole easily led bastard :)

  • First building was a plane crash.

    Second building was a plane crash + a demolition.

    A lot of people dismiss such notions because they believe the media to be the source of real truth. THAT is actually the CRAZY perspective on this situation.

    If you learn nothing else about the media, learn that they misconscrew everything for controversy, reaction, financial gain or any other plus in their favour.

  • is that george noory idk how to spell his last name, from coast to coast am talking to him? or art bell?

  • at :18 , he say "it should be ... " controled demolition? : )

  • Interrupted?

    FIrst of all, learn to spell "interrupted."

    Second of all, that wasn't an interruption. It's called a conversation.

    Get a life, loser!

  • -2 and falling. maybe it's you who should get a life :)

  • 9/11 was an outside job.

  • osama

  • he is just using demolition as an example, he isnt saying it happened fuck tards.

  • Why has all of the reporters who have referred to the towers collapse as controlled demolition, no longer with their news affiliate?

    Bye bye Dan Rather. Rest in peace Peter Jennings and Tim Russert.

    Fuck Time Warner, Disney, GE, and Ruppert Murdock!!

    NWO facist SOBs!

  • Dan Rather got ousted over the GW Bush Air National Guard thing, not 9/11.

    Peter Jennings was, like, 100 years old and a heavy smoker, and Tim Russert died seven years after the attack of a heart condition--which should not come as a surprise, as he was sort of doughy.

  • He didn't CALL it a demolition, he COMPARED it to one.

    Which is not an unreasonable thing to do, I think, as, to a layperson, at least, that's SORT OF what it looked like.

  • What if the reporter used a different simile for the collapse? If he said "like a youngster smashing a sand castle" would you then blame a giant child?

  • Right!! I start to believe that some of them would really go there if that simile was used!!

  • Our government isnt smart enough to have orchestrated 9/11.

    If you believe that someone as fucking stupid as george bush could pull this off, you are a window licker.

  • Do you honestly believe Bush runs the country? Come on, really...

  • @boerinbeton

    Obama does you fool.

  • the realv0x...but some afganis that live in caves are?

  • Whoa, look at all the paid shills coming to wreak havoc on the comments section on this vid.

    Go back to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, you bloody-hand psyops!

  • conspiracy theories are created by the gullible for the gullible

  • "conspiracy theories are created by the gullible for the gullible"

    So, who created the 19 hijacker conspiracy theory? Do you actually believe it?

  • Engineer Gordon Ross analyses in detail how the towers were destroyed. Independant foreign analysis not some US Government Agency flogging the same old propoganda...

    video . google . com . au / videoplay?docid=48015660252927­53615&q=gordon+ross&total=225&­start=0&num=10&so=0&type=searc­h&plindex=0

  • no your just stubborn. cause their is plenty going on just think about it. real hard. i hated conspiracy theorist but their is to much going on that cant be explained.

  • read, read, read, read,readreadread

  • It's not a conspiracy anymore. It's fact. You're just living in your sad bubble of blissful ignorance.

  • OOOOkay. Whatever.

  • Holy Shit this video is hard evidence that the building was brought down with explosives. thanks for wasting my time with these damn conspiracies

  • Darn! We forgot to tell Peter Jennings about the demolition conspiracy! ...Oh brother. The irony is that the conspiracy theorists are always telling everyone else to "wake up."

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more