All the women in the WWE training grounds right now are all ex-models. The WWE is not interested in a female indie wrestler unless they are the daughter of an ex-wrestler.
And I wonder if more people know Maryse or Talia Madison, now days. Just wondering.
it's not the same thing never was, to be able to wrestle is to be able to go hold for hold, move for move, then to be able to entertain is showmanship. I hate how people are starting to mix the two, I used to wrestle for school and I'm an actor. I know how to wrestle and entertain I can make my wrestling entertaining but they are no way the same thing. If that's the case shit wrestling deserves to die.
It IS the same thing, since when have the number of moves a wrestler does have any factor in making them good or not? Wrestling isn't a real sport, it's entertainment. Companies such as TNA, ROH, and WWE are all for profit companies, that mean's they all need money to survive. And good wrestlers do not make their company money by going hold for hold, move for move. That's not only boring but also incredibly stupid. If I wanted to watch that, I'd watch the Olympics.
since when? since the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's and so on, depends on who you ask that question. ROH isn't all about entertainment most of their main stars do go hold for hold, move for move to make a good match. Same with Japan, Mexico in which they use a lot of their moves and matches to tell a story, the british wrestling, yea TNA and WWE tend to focus more on entertainment there's a number of other companies that focus on the physical/sport of it all to entertain the audiences.
A good match is comprised of more than just pointless moves. Workrate, selling, psychology are more important than technique (in any style of pro wrestling). Professional Wrestlers (in the US at least) are trying to put on a show and not trying to mimic the NCAA's or Olympics or UFC. Two guys just beating on each other does nothing, the match has to have emotion, an even flow, and most importantly (still talking about US wrestling, not Japanese) the look of realism.
dude, technique goes into just about every match workrate, psychology, selling, all go hand in hand ok. That's what makes a wrestling in the business, guy's who had good workrate, psychology, and selling goes to guys like The Rock, Stone Cold, Jake Roberts who's psychology helped pave the way for people like Austin. Greats like Angle, Benoit, Malenko, Storm, Lynn, Danielson, Regal,and even Guerrero (RIP) great wrestlers who have/had technique, workrate, selling, and psychology.
Pointless moves in my opinion goes to shit like the fuckin samoan spike, kozlov's headbutt, five knuckle shuffle, khali's chop, Hogan's Legdrop, though I do love it The People's Elbow, shit like that is pointless and or stupid man. Great to watch but seriously after a while it gets dry. Main reason I appreciate technique that helps bring moves together man. Two guys beating the crap out of eachother can be good to watch to see who has more in them.
and still you don't understand. What is technique without psychology, workrate, or selling? Nothing. My point was that a wrestler doesn't need to do a bunch of fancy moves in order to put on a good match. And on that note, not only technical wrestlers are classified as good wrestlers. A wrestler like Hulk Hogan can be just as good as a wrestler like Bret Hart
And no, seeing two guys go at it for 20 minutes chopping the shit out of a willing partner is stupid.
moves like the spike, the headbutt, and the chop are realistic moves. A 300 lb man headbutting an opponent into oblivion call look just as effective as some ridiculous looking piledriver
bullshit, a headbutt to the head is believable a fucking pushing headbutt to the chest or some shit depending on you take it can be effective, but at the same time it's not. I'd believe a drop on the head before I believe a thumb to the throat. I'm willing to let this shit roll because when it all boils no one is going to give a shit about what we're arguing about not you nor me, it's opinionated and missing the fact this vid is about Lane... Ashley Lane
you're right you don't need it to put on a good match, you just need it to be put on a great match. Hogan was good, but Hart was great big difference in those two. This whole argument is on opinion neither one arguments have any crucial fact and the sad thing is this has nothing to do with Ashley Lane.
even though she'd get more popular with WWE shes better off with TNA. WWE isn't interested in women that can wrestle as good as her. But she could do wonders for TNA's women division.
awww Ashley before her boob job looked so cute
operations1000 10 months ago
im so proud of Madison/Ashley a real womens wrestler yay
jillfan1 1 year ago
It's a shame that once woman get into a major company, they get major boobs too. Woman are much more attractive with natural breasts.
awkwaRdcaRRot 1 year ago
Nice Tribute :)
Warrior29200 1 year ago
ashley is sexy
njchampion 2 years ago
at 42 ashely looks like kelly kelly
ADHRG3592 2 years ago
i didnt think madison could do all this i hope she isnt back with velvet for long cos i want her to be face i hate her as heel she cant pull it off
jakatak13 2 years ago
I hope after being beat down by The Beautiful People, they finally turn Madison face and give her a shot to do some stuff.
Quatah85 2 years ago
tna make her look like shit compared to this and the shimmers.
paramorefreak18 2 years ago 5
@paramorefreak18 hey at least she is knockout champ now
kasimir08079 1 year ago
I know the name of the song. I wanna see the actual video from MTV. I can't find it.
jons44 2 years ago
Sigh...will someone just please post the music video of this song?
jons44 2 years ago
Love this song. Just hearing it is like a trip down memory lane. Had never heard of Ashley Lane, but am an instant fan now.
Thank you for putting this up, very enjoyable. Good editing and choices of clips.
graeypoet 2 years ago 2
she looks like WWE's Mickie James
RKOyou 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
told ya she sucks
amaliz2d 2 years ago
ashley lane is sexy and can wrestle that is very rare to find in a women wrestler in my opinon
bradleybravo 3 years ago 8
she's a decent wrestler and hot! hope she joins tna or wwe soon
gossuk 3 years ago
YEAH, she wrestling Kong tonight on Impact,gr8 vid
NeroShade 3 years ago
Who sings this song?
abwiz74 3 years ago
Letters To Cleo- Here and Now
GREGLOVESJENNA 3 years ago
Nice!!!
AllanSederap7 3 years ago
cool
JeffHardyfangirl22 3 years ago
she rocks!!!
cool vid!
00AshleyFanNation00 3 years ago
All the women in the WWE training grounds right now are all ex-models. The WWE is not interested in a female indie wrestler unless they are the daughter of an ex-wrestler.
And I wonder if more people know Maryse or Talia Madison, now days. Just wondering.
toodarkmark 3 years ago
Talia Madison aka Velvet Sky sucks.Bad example
TAUREAN1 3 years ago
yeah ... she sucks so badly she's one of the most successful heels in TNA, male or female
your an idiot
kfowlkes 3 years ago
She is a very successful heel. As for her wrestling skills, no way!
blazer79 3 years ago 2
wrestling skill and the ability to entertain are the same thing. Talia is a successful heel because she is a good wrestler/ entertainer.
kfowlkes 3 years ago
it's not the same thing never was, to be able to wrestle is to be able to go hold for hold, move for move, then to be able to entertain is showmanship. I hate how people are starting to mix the two, I used to wrestle for school and I'm an actor. I know how to wrestle and entertain I can make my wrestling entertaining but they are no way the same thing. If that's the case shit wrestling deserves to die.
AMF4 3 years ago
It IS the same thing, since when have the number of moves a wrestler does have any factor in making them good or not? Wrestling isn't a real sport, it's entertainment. Companies such as TNA, ROH, and WWE are all for profit companies, that mean's they all need money to survive. And good wrestlers do not make their company money by going hold for hold, move for move. That's not only boring but also incredibly stupid. If I wanted to watch that, I'd watch the Olympics.
kfowlkes 3 years ago
since when? since the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's and so on, depends on who you ask that question. ROH isn't all about entertainment most of their main stars do go hold for hold, move for move to make a good match. Same with Japan, Mexico in which they use a lot of their moves and matches to tell a story, the british wrestling, yea TNA and WWE tend to focus more on entertainment there's a number of other companies that focus on the physical/sport of it all to entertain the audiences.
AMF4 3 years ago
A good match is comprised of more than just pointless moves. Workrate, selling, psychology are more important than technique (in any style of pro wrestling). Professional Wrestlers (in the US at least) are trying to put on a show and not trying to mimic the NCAA's or Olympics or UFC. Two guys just beating on each other does nothing, the match has to have emotion, an even flow, and most importantly (still talking about US wrestling, not Japanese) the look of realism.
kfowlkes 3 years ago
dude, technique goes into just about every match workrate, psychology, selling, all go hand in hand ok. That's what makes a wrestling in the business, guy's who had good workrate, psychology, and selling goes to guys like The Rock, Stone Cold, Jake Roberts who's psychology helped pave the way for people like Austin. Greats like Angle, Benoit, Malenko, Storm, Lynn, Danielson, Regal,and even Guerrero (RIP) great wrestlers who have/had technique, workrate, selling, and psychology.
AMF4 3 years ago
Pointless moves in my opinion goes to shit like the fuckin samoan spike, kozlov's headbutt, five knuckle shuffle, khali's chop, Hogan's Legdrop, though I do love it The People's Elbow, shit like that is pointless and or stupid man. Great to watch but seriously after a while it gets dry. Main reason I appreciate technique that helps bring moves together man. Two guys beating the crap out of eachother can be good to watch to see who has more in them.
AMF4 3 years ago
and still you don't understand. What is technique without psychology, workrate, or selling? Nothing. My point was that a wrestler doesn't need to do a bunch of fancy moves in order to put on a good match. And on that note, not only technical wrestlers are classified as good wrestlers. A wrestler like Hulk Hogan can be just as good as a wrestler like Bret Hart
And no, seeing two guys go at it for 20 minutes chopping the shit out of a willing partner is stupid.
kfowlkes 3 years ago
moves like the spike, the headbutt, and the chop are realistic moves. A 300 lb man headbutting an opponent into oblivion call look just as effective as some ridiculous looking piledriver
kfowlkes 3 years ago
bullshit, a headbutt to the head is believable a fucking pushing headbutt to the chest or some shit depending on you take it can be effective, but at the same time it's not. I'd believe a drop on the head before I believe a thumb to the throat. I'm willing to let this shit roll because when it all boils no one is going to give a shit about what we're arguing about not you nor me, it's opinionated and missing the fact this vid is about Lane... Ashley Lane
AMF4 3 years ago 2
hey, you originally responded to me, I merely responded back
kfowlkes 3 years ago
you're right you don't need it to put on a good match, you just need it to be put on a great match. Hogan was good, but Hart was great big difference in those two. This whole argument is on opinion neither one arguments have any crucial fact and the sad thing is this has nothing to do with Ashley Lane.
AMF4 3 years ago
WWE does not just hire women models
Chyna
Layla
Gail Kim
Beth Phoenix
Mickie James
Milena Rouka
GREGLOVESJENNA 3 years ago
WOW she is really good. I hope WWE or TNA sign her up. I'd prefer WWE to as then she'd be more popular but if not then TNA will do.
YTsTopWWEDiva 3 years ago
even though she'd get more popular with WWE shes better off with TNA. WWE isn't interested in women that can wrestle as good as her. But she could do wonders for TNA's women division.
hailxsabin413 3 years ago
Great video and good use of the Letters to Cleo. :)
bubbleboyuk 3 years ago