Great video, even to somebody who knows nothing about digital imagery. Congrats!
It's sickening to think that leading sociopaths lie to the people, after having probably murdered them. I have heard that the 9/11 attacks were a sacrifice to placate the gods, who would have attended to absorb the fear and horror amidst the carnage.
At 02:37, the nose-out shot seems to indicate a vertical line in mid-air that flattens the nose. Pointed at 02:36, as demonstrated for frames 5 and 38!
Guys like him dont exist anymore these days. All the intellectuals in the West have been successfully feminazicised!
To the extent women gain power in a culture or a society they are doomed to failure. The shift of wealth and influence from West to East corresponds perfectly with this observation
BTW: Which is the wealthiest country in Europe? Switzerland - They were the last to grant women voting rights (1972).
But what about this nagging point. What about the people that actually saw it? And I am not smashing you here. I am just from NY, and know plenty of friends that saw it as it happened. Some of them from quite close.
@mlomenzo yes GeorgeWBush saw flight11 impact the north tower before his appointment with 'my pet goat' and has NEVER retracted this claim. People who believe this is "debris" exiting have to come up with an exit hole 20ft in diameter on the "F175" exit side of WTC2. Dust in the form of a 3 dimensional moving object? YET another 9/11 first and last!
The day I watched the clips on TV, I had a nagging thought that it all looked 'fake' somehow. I chalked it up to being conditioned to seeing special effects on TV my whole life; something like this in real life wasn't going to look "Hollywood-perfect." Friends watching with me noticed the same, not-quite-right quality about the footage also. Now I'm a full-time video compositor and I can't help but question this footage with more critical eyes. This is some pretty damning evidence, right here.
I have a theory based on a missing ingredient to help us determine fact from fantasy..that missing thing is common sense..When the Government we support with tax dollars refuses to offer pictures of the "plane"that hit the pentagon..when Barry obama refuses to prove he is an American citizen..WE are being lied to..when we refuse to hold them accountable..they win..how to make them listen.?.STOP PAYING THEM OUR TAXES UNTIL THEY TELL THE TRUTH..iS HOW TO DO IT
In this dream I and everyone around me were running (in terror) through the streets of a very large city and we were being pursued by a giant black mass. A man ran out of a nearby building and was pulling people out of the path of the cloud and into his building. Finally I remember him grabbing my arm and as he led me to the "Shelter" I looked back at the cloud and watched it shoot 2 fireballs into some very tall skyscrapers.
Your brain sees a nose cone go in and expects a nose cone to come out; that's how it fools you into seeing what you want to believe. But if you look at frame 36 and 37 you can clearly see that it is debris being projected outward. It's only in frame 38 that the projection of debris actually resembles the front of a plane. This video would make more sense if, in the years since 9/11/01, we haven't had ninety-nine-thousand more angles from personal camcorders showing the second impact.
@alexrivera03 Since you implicitly ask people to use their brains (and eyes) properly, you should be able to see that the initial frames of the nose out are covered by what I call 'blast pixels'( at 2:44 ). Those 'blast pixels' are clearly but the first stage of the 'fireball' which eventually fully engulfs the nosecone.
As for the "99.000- more angles" (actually less than 50), please know that all 'amateur videos' have been thoroughly analyzed, compared and exposed as digital frauds.
@alexrivera03 if you had a brain you would know that the wtc is a steel frame building the plane coudnt pierce the first wall of double steel as thick as a tanks front armor but debris pierced a same wall of steel as thick as the tanks armor?
How can the nose come out of the tower looking the same as it did going in? The.core.column would.have shredded them. Please get.a.clue and with all do respect, a life while you're at it!
man this is ridiculous... if anything, this is proof that a plane DID hit the towers. let's say that this IS the nose coming out - that actually makes sense. the engines are on the wings, and would easily have ripped off in the collision, causing the explosion to eject forcefully out of both sides of the building. the nose, being aerodynamic and sturdy, could have made it through the building almost in-tact, then fallen. you're spending too much time staring at grainy pixels...
@dbagglestein noses of planes aren't sturdy. Flying into a large non-steel bird at speed can cause the bird to rip right through it. Google it. Also, look at the picture of the tower at the end of this clip. Let's say that was the intact nose; which hole did it go through?
plus, aviation experts agree that it's impossible for passenger jets to carry out such a maneuver. that speed at sea level would shred the wings off. and the accuracy, just not possible. so pretty much every claim the guvment and big media made about the events that day were not true.
The perpetrators probably had 'highly payed EXPERTS' working on their TV fakery and they still messed it up!! I bet they used TV Fakery for the collapses also, that's probably why the towers "fell" so strangely.
Thank you for all of your hard work on the 9/11 project.
even know videos like this show visible evidence of cgi during "live" tv coverage, i dont support the "no plane theory" because i remember seen a video recorded by a friend that showed a non commercial plane crashing into one of the towers. since youtube was 3+ years away and my friend died in a car crash in 2004, the video probably dissapeared in history. 9/11 was and inside job!!!
the building was designed essentially as a cheese grater, so that if a plane did crash into it, it would get shredded to pieces, it's nose would be the FIRST and most obvious thing to get destroyed
My personal opinion is that the planes never existed and the people on the plane were contrived as well OR real people but later assassinated...And anybody that promotes the "remote control plane theory" like ALEX JONES, a jesuit coadjutor puppet for the POPE, is plainly a D.E.C.E.I.V.E.R. Those buildings disintegrated into dust from an extremely high tech atomic bomb that only attacks certain elements...It was NOT thermate...And the initial hit was likely caused by a missile...
The BBC nose out video is even clearer yet. Its is real close and shows the nose come out then blow up, But how can a cockpit blow up when no fuel exist in the cockpit? All fuel are contained in the wings. And how would a aluminum can pierce into a building come out perfect on the other side then blow up.
@JISINSANE3 not only that , but the nose cones of these planes are made of a composite material that's NOT METAL, so how in the hell could it have made it all the way through the building and come out intact on the other side???
@chh5555 ... Just happens to resemble the profile of the nose? hahahaha. And then disappears and loses resemblance? A blatant munipulation of imagery pixels!!!! and you grew up watching the road runner cartoons... you must be a physics major.... or should we reason... psychological warfare major? your irrelevant and dismissed... go play with your leggos and GI Joe kid.( or barbie)
@mrmoonshadow Damn, how did you know??? My cover is blown... yes I DO work for the government and part of my job is hanging out here at youtube spreading disinformation and creating doubt and confusion among you free thinkers. Well I guess it's back to the Secret Black Op Think Tank and try to come up with a better idea, jeeeez you guys are just toooo cunning!
why does everyone call wtc7 "the smoking gun",surely the fact that all crash footage has been proven fake is the biggest clue to the govs/medias involvement.the original "live" footage was almost amateurish,footage that followed years later was better made but still had it's flaws.would the gov demolish the wtc with people inside...read "divided we stand" by eric darton and learn how the wtc was emptied of its tennant in the mid 90's and only virtual space later leased.
There is a theory that this "plane" was in reality a missile with hologram projectors attatched to it. now, i think thats a theory created by someone from the funny farm, but id like to hear everyones thoughts on this.
The 'nose out' video is very interesting for a number of reasons.
1. If the nose did come out the other side of the building it would have fallen to the ground.
2. The fade to black would have had to have been done by the station's vision switcher person. But why - there is no reason for it in live broadcast news.
3. The footage does not feature in any archives, yet it is the clearest shot of the second plane hitting the tower.
The real people responsible for 9/11 will be confronted, tried and convicted for their crimes against humanity. I was in 7th grade when this happened. I'll never forget watcing this in math class. And I was young and ignorant, but now older and after seeing all the evidence and proof of the lies spat by mainstream media, im without a doubt convinced this was not the work of terrorists. "A PLANE hitting" the side of a building cant make it collaspe from the bottom.
Chefelvis : Several false clues have been inserted into the forged videos simply to introduce false leads : in French, it's called 'dépistage' and is a classic feature of any major psy-op. (The 'pods', btw, are not visible on all shots from beneath ).
It has also been proved that the 'flashes' were inserted on SOME VERSIONS OF THE SAME shots and not on others. The Naudet 1st hit, for instance, comes in versions with/and without a flash . So does the Hezarkhani 2nd hit.
The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe conclusively shows the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples.
The new version of September Clues features mostly high grade, first-generation mpeg2 material from the HD footage once downloadable from the official TV archive org website. Regarding this FOX nose-out clip, no better versions are available as it never made it to the archives . In order to understand this matter fully, it is essential to watch my related research :
Also, if the nose of the airplane made it through the building, wouldn't it have been found somewhere among the rubble? Once exiting, it would have continued away from the tower on a downward parabolic path and while it would have been covered/flattened by the eventual falling debris, it generally should have been recovered.
simon, i have always wondered why you do not consider the jason100 analysis of this entire fox5 shot to be the most blatant video evidence of tv fakery and/or no planes. can you comment on this?
i mean, your nose out theory is reasonable, but jason100's analysis is indisputable. you cannot argue that the plane existed when it didnt, and then it just SHOWED UP for the nose out shot. please, comment on why you push ANY theory harder than the jason100 clip.
Please watch September Clues A... I respect very much jason100's analysis which certainly is not in contradiction with mine. Let there be a million videos to support and reinforce this subject - and maybe people will catch on. Don't you agree ?
So if there was jet airliner crashing into this tower then the damage had to be caused by explosions inside the building. To cause the damage as wide as it did at an angle would have required at least three or four floors to work from in lining up the explosives to form a plane like image from the damage. The occupants of thos offices would have had to know about it. Does an yone know who occupied the offices where the "entry" damage was done?
One theory has it that the plane approaching is some sort of graphic overlay, or like a video mix with another shot of the towers. But when the time came to line them up there was a problem and the "plane" overshot the tower. Thats why it quickly went to black screen for a second or so. I have to admit that the plane approach does look fake. On the other hand, the damage to the building in all shots and stills does look like plane damage.
1 : The noise of the 'aircraft engines' is vastly different on all available 9/11 soundtracks.
2 : The FAA, BTS and NTSB paperwork linked to these airliners is replete of inconsistencies. No members of passenger families have come forward saying : "Hey ! My Dad died on one of these airplanes! Stop it!"
3. The cellphone calls were impossible to do from those airliners. They are just part of the official 9/11 propaganda.
Thanks again for all the information. I`m very interested on some things I found on Youtube that could explain things.
I found one video with witnesses stating there were big grey aircraft with objects strapped to them: ?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related
Also there`s good evidence of passengers/crew being fed lines to say into phones on the promise of seeing their families before being murdered by the CIA: ?v=eqRYf6X2Cb0
Funny how everyone says ''people say'' and ''there must have been'' about witnesses to the planes. I'm personally yet to find any witnesses that actually saw planes that day nor can any of my friends supply people they know who saw planes.
Ok so if there were no planes...than why do all the people say that there were planes.Further more there are other conspiracy documentaries that say it was an inside job but still stick with the planes:-??
An in-depth analysis of the eyewitness testimonies establishes that most people (who saw something at all) reported "small planes" of various sorts. Whatever hit the WTC was not a large object.
I will soon post a comprehensive review of this particular aspect of 9/11 on my thesocialserviceDOTit website.
Who is to blame for the worlds tragedies? = Human beings & their greed for absolute power. There isn't only one culprit infact there's probably millions. So you people go on about seeking the truth and preaching the word but whats the point. You all know in your heart of hearts who's to blame.
Yes, we the people are partly to blame for our ignorance and perhaps apathy toward these issues. That is why we MUST act now. People must be shaken out of their damnable reverie of propaganda and WAKE UP to the cold hard truth. ONLY THEN can America be saved. Never has it been more urgent. Keep true to the TRUE America and fight for it! Only WE can stop this NWO...only WE can fight the good fight. We MUST fight, if not for outselves, then those who are unable to fight for liberty and freedom!
Im sure with or without the "dodgy videos" people actually saw a plane go into the buildings. Must have otherwise you would of heard about it by now. Good theory though I hope one day we get to the bottom of this enigmatic riddle of a puzzle.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this doesn't prove anything. the problem is that the bbc and others showed early footage. this may well be delibertly done to add even more confusion to the matter.
only 3 things.
1. why are there numerous vids of private people showing planes.
2. that nose coming out might just be a dustcloud. ok, maybe it is even the nose, deformed on its way out.
3. wreckage of plane on the streets below.
allthough i respect the work of this person, it is not good for the truther movement.
1. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES partF on my channel to find out just who these 'private people' were.
2.Have you watched this video at all ?
3. Please meet the wreckage here : SEPTEMBER CLUES EPILOGUE on my channel. If you believe the wreckage is legit, do you also believe in the various terrorists' passports found at all crash sites?
GWBush flat out, refused to meet with the 9/11 commission by himself.
He refused to be interviewed under oath or have any transcripts or recordings made.
What was he hiding? What was he afraid of?
The truth is out there, but the official 9/11 story lacks credability. WE must research and be open to the possability that we have been lied to. More on you tube search,
Zeitgeist - The Movie: World Trade Center (Part 1 of 4)
Some of your claims in "september clues" or this video seem valid to me.
But remember, this is New York City.
What if only *one person* made a video showing no plane? Do you think they wouldn't find a way to publish it, send it to Alex or some of the other "911 truth" guys.
I know you say that this is due to police officers that confiscated every video camera on ground zero, but do you honestly believe the wouldn't be a single tape to escape that?
Anyone who even NEEDS to see this frame by frame as proof that 9/11 was a total fake is an idiot who MUST INSULTINGLY believe that American engineers + architects built the Towers out of SAND!
Well looks like bull$&!% to me - and I don't mean this video. How can these anomaly's be passed over and ignored? Yet I listen to Alex and he refers to this issue as dis-info. Its like the forbidden subject of truthers or something. Lets not f$£% about all this footage stinks as does the 7/7 London CCTV 'evidence'. I fail to see why this is so invalid or taboo to talk about. Our news showed about 10 sec's of footage for like 24 hours, that in itself smells like a rat to me.
How can empirical factfinding be disinfo ? To discredit and attack this research is the work of gatekeepers - and there seems to be a whole bunch of them...Think for yourself, always.
Well that's what I'm starting to realize man does this mean Alex is trying to start a manageable and controllable revolt? His stance on the tv fakery seems completely irrational. RIP William Copper
Hi Simon, I just thought of this. The white dashes remind me of the white dashes that flicker along the edge of the WTC in the NBC "chopper" shot of the explosion, no matter how the view tilts (one line flashes where the explosion ends up happening, and I've never seen artifacts like that). Hmm....
Also, we need to abolish all US support for the racist, fascist Jewish State of Israel; totally redefine the role of the US military, removing US troops from all overseas missions that do not defend against an immediate threat to US soil; and redefine US foreign policy to become essentially noninterventionist.
"Things must change." True. But things will not change without a real Revolution in the USA that gets rid of the CIA, gets rid of the Pentagon as we know it, and completely restructures the US government. All of the US government perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks must hang, even if that means executing thousands of people. Anything less would be "pissing into the wind."
You're quite right. The "plane" banks as if it's making a very sharp left turn. This is another point which destroys the credibilty of this shot :
A plane banking that sharply (profile shows one wing sharply up and the other sharply down) would be changing direction at an extremely fast rate. For a real aircraft to do such a steep turn - ultimately hitting the tower almost dead center - is frankly in the realm of science fiction.
thank you for this video. i used to think people were crazy for thinking the government would be behind the deaths of thousands of american people, but in reality i was the crazy one.
The US government does not control media video feeds across networks, especially in foreign media (Fox is News Corp, Murdoch, major shareholder, Saudi Arabia). Theyre waving the American flag while we attack the enemies of the international petroleum cartel. And we borrow the money from them to do it. :) ps. the cartel is primarily anglo-dutch controlled , bp-shell.
I think you're on the money here, where is the delay on this shot for the "explosion" that comes out. There is some delay on other shots I think. Also, can you verify, that the plane is moving at the same rate for the timming when it should exit?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I see a plane traveling at high speed go straight through a building. Oh, it must be a missle, right. Tell that to the passengers of the jets that crashed into the towers. Oh, thats right there PLANE hit a BUILDING.
a carbon-fibered nose-cone CANNOT pass through two sets of steel-framed walls and a steel core and come out the other side INTACT but if you believe that I have a business partner named santa who will broker a deal for a bridge spanning the east river-the passengers(many of whom were probably made up) are another story entirely-and it's "their" plane, not "there" plane
problem is, there is no exit hole. i thought there was . google "wtc exit hole". i feel dum. ozzybinoswald said i was close to heresy. so i took a long, 3 week look. I am not seeing things clearly. no one can figure it out. no one can see clearly and flight 175 was not what hit the wtc.
Yeah it's very true, that why they cruse at 35ooo ft where the air is thin, less resistance on the airframe, drag on the engines etc. The max velocity of a 767 in level flight at 700 to 800 ft is approx 250 - 300 mph, if it was nearly accomplishing its max cruse at 800 ft the plane would be being ripped apart and the resistance on the control surfaces would make the plane uncontrollable.
And remember these planes were allegedly being flown by "pilots" with no experience in a commercial airliner and very little flight experience at all.
TV Fakery, I know... but some videos are real, like the NBC4 chopper live video (September Clues part 3) So I say (MAYBE) the planes are fake, the "nose out" is real and this is why many videos are cut just after the impact. please, watch this video(8 sec) watch?v=cpw4FZcfiqM and the UAV Predator image on my channel Maybe I'm wrong, I know...
I will visit this video often and rate it five stars. A work of art. Please continue to expose the biggest lie in human history. Keep of the fight, keep posting videos for justice!
Talk about wagging the dog!! Where's the bag of Doritos disquised as a baby? Isn't there another piece of footage showing the nose out? Isn't it the shot with a streaking F-111 or rod zooming downwards?
Excellent work. It is proven fact that all of the "plane" footage of 9/11 is fake. Turning the video weapon around and using it on the perps will undoubtedly help to make that fact become more widely accepted.
Great video, even to somebody who knows nothing about digital imagery. Congrats!
It's sickening to think that leading sociopaths lie to the people, after having probably murdered them. I have heard that the 9/11 attacks were a sacrifice to placate the gods, who would have attended to absorb the fear and horror amidst the carnage.
At 02:37, the nose-out shot seems to indicate a vertical line in mid-air that flattens the nose. Pointed at 02:36, as demonstrated for frames 5 and 38!
OldMrMegaDrive 3 weeks ago in playlist 9/11 SEPTEMBER CLUES
This has been flagged as spam show
Alan was THE dude! Smart, wise, womanizer!
Guys like him dont exist anymore these days. All the intellectuals in the West have been successfully feminazicised!
To the extent women gain power in a culture or a society they are doomed to failure. The shift of wealth and influence from West to East corresponds perfectly with this observation
BTW: Which is the wealthiest country in Europe? Switzerland - They were the last to grant women voting rights (1972).
Draw your own conclusions.
MrSlapmeister 1 month ago
But what about this nagging point. What about the people that actually saw it? And I am not smashing you here. I am just from NY, and know plenty of friends that saw it as it happened. Some of them from quite close.
mlomenzo 1 month ago
@mlomenzo yes GeorgeWBush saw flight11 impact the north tower before his appointment with 'my pet goat' and has NEVER retracted this claim. People who believe this is "debris" exiting have to come up with an exit hole 20ft in diameter on the "F175" exit side of WTC2. Dust in the form of a 3 dimensional moving object? YET another 9/11 first and last!
TODB0AMER 1 month ago
The day I watched the clips on TV, I had a nagging thought that it all looked 'fake' somehow. I chalked it up to being conditioned to seeing special effects on TV my whole life; something like this in real life wasn't going to look "Hollywood-perfect." Friends watching with me noticed the same, not-quite-right quality about the footage also. Now I'm a full-time video compositor and I can't help but question this footage with more critical eyes. This is some pretty damning evidence, right here.
chrisherself 2 months ago in playlist My ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH 4
Excellent video Simon. The only explanation: a glitch in the Matrix. Who ever got it, got it...
PsychotronicWar 2 months ago
I have a theory based on a missing ingredient to help us determine fact from fantasy..that missing thing is common sense..When the Government we support with tax dollars refuses to offer pictures of the "plane"that hit the pentagon..when Barry obama refuses to prove he is an American citizen..WE are being lied to..when we refuse to hold them accountable..they win..how to make them listen.?.STOP PAYING THEM OUR TAXES UNTIL THEY TELL THE TRUTH..iS HOW TO DO IT
evetsgolb 2 months ago
A month before 9/11 happened I had a nightmare:
In this dream I and everyone around me were running (in terror) through the streets of a very large city and we were being pursued by a giant black mass. A man ran out of a nearby building and was pulling people out of the path of the cloud and into his building. Finally I remember him grabbing my arm and as he led me to the "Shelter" I looked back at the cloud and watched it shoot 2 fireballs into some very tall skyscrapers.
Weird right?
101Swiftflick 2 months ago
The color tone of the nose out and nose in are completely the same It is the nose of the cgi plane. It is as plane as the "nose" on your face. :)
911Equinox 4 months ago
Your brain sees a nose cone go in and expects a nose cone to come out; that's how it fools you into seeing what you want to believe. But if you look at frame 36 and 37 you can clearly see that it is debris being projected outward. It's only in frame 38 that the projection of debris actually resembles the front of a plane. This video would make more sense if, in the years since 9/11/01, we haven't had ninety-nine-thousand more angles from personal camcorders showing the second impact.
alexrivera03 4 months ago
@alexrivera03 Since you implicitly ask people to use their brains (and eyes) properly, you should be able to see that the initial frames of the nose out are covered by what I call 'blast pixels'( at 2:44 ). Those 'blast pixels' are clearly but the first stage of the 'fireball' which eventually fully engulfs the nosecone.
As for the "99.000- more angles" (actually less than 50), please know that all 'amateur videos' have been thoroughly analyzed, compared and exposed as digital frauds.
simonshack 4 months ago 2
@alexrivera03 if you had a brain you would know that the wtc is a steel frame building the plane coudnt pierce the first wall of double steel as thick as a tanks front armor but debris pierced a same wall of steel as thick as the tanks armor?
poznanski666 3 months ago
How can the nose come out of the tower looking the same as it did going in? The.core.column would.have shredded them. Please get.a.clue and with all do respect, a life while you're at it!
andymorejon 5 months ago
man this is ridiculous... if anything, this is proof that a plane DID hit the towers. let's say that this IS the nose coming out - that actually makes sense. the engines are on the wings, and would easily have ripped off in the collision, causing the explosion to eject forcefully out of both sides of the building. the nose, being aerodynamic and sturdy, could have made it through the building almost in-tact, then fallen. you're spending too much time staring at grainy pixels...
dbagglestein 5 months ago
@dbagglestein noses of planes aren't sturdy. Flying into a large non-steel bird at speed can cause the bird to rip right through it. Google it. Also, look at the picture of the tower at the end of this clip. Let's say that was the intact nose; which hole did it go through?
GeorgeMuffinMan23 4 months ago
Such a tiny but important point, that the screen blacks out at that one moment...
firesong888 5 months ago
9/11 September Clues - TV Fakery & PSYOP
I watched this in full last night. Fantastic and time consuming research! Well done.
I believe if it looks and smells like shit, then it probably is.
This research is a shit poking stick for those still not convinced and the stench is overwhelming..
On a side note please tell me the name of the track that plays at 1:08.
istanbul884 5 months ago
I always thought that 911 was an terrorist attack but after this video I'm really starting to re thing
Balien260 5 months ago
to see some calculations and additional support, watch this video: watch?v=vEoievoxces
anthonyc31 5 months ago
plus, aviation experts agree that it's impossible for passenger jets to carry out such a maneuver. that speed at sea level would shred the wings off. and the accuracy, just not possible. so pretty much every claim the guvment and big media made about the events that day were not true.
tonoklein 6 months ago
The perpetrators probably had 'highly payed EXPERTS' working on their TV fakery and they still messed it up!! I bet they used TV Fakery for the collapses also, that's probably why the towers "fell" so strangely.
Thank you for all of your hard work on the 9/11 project.
lucymo1000 6 months ago
airplane-noses do NOT explode
sir4ki 7 months ago
It's debris you paranoid fools! Look at any video that shows the north face of the building during impact and you will see this cloud of debris!
jawsflounderace 7 months ago
Cool
SulaimanWar 8 months ago
whoa
SulaimanWar 8 months ago
even know videos like this show visible evidence of cgi during "live" tv coverage, i dont support the "no plane theory" because i remember seen a video recorded by a friend that showed a non commercial plane crashing into one of the towers. since youtube was 3+ years away and my friend died in a car crash in 2004, the video probably dissapeared in history. 9/11 was and inside job!!!
CarimboHanky 9 months ago
the building was designed essentially as a cheese grater, so that if a plane did crash into it, it would get shredded to pieces, it's nose would be the FIRST and most obvious thing to get destroyed
seanredford 9 months ago in playlist Was 9/11 News Footage Faked? 2
great video and info!!
koolfingaz 9 months ago 2
I made calculations that support "NO PLANES" explanation. See my Flikr site "anthonyc31" under "911 - WTC No Planes Evidence"
anthonyc31 9 months ago
shows slow freeze frame of the nose in nose out and up close
watch?v=0GhBeVm1eRY still looks crazy
danp5648 11 months ago
My personal opinion is that the planes never existed and the people on the plane were contrived as well OR real people but later assassinated...And anybody that promotes the "remote control plane theory" like ALEX JONES, a jesuit coadjutor puppet for the POPE, is plainly a D.E.C.E.I.V.E.R. Those buildings disintegrated into dust from an extremely high tech atomic bomb that only attacks certain elements...It was NOT thermate...And the initial hit was likely caused by a missile...
thelamb777 1 year ago
The BBC nose out video is even clearer yet. Its is real close and shows the nose come out then blow up, But how can a cockpit blow up when no fuel exist in the cockpit? All fuel are contained in the wings. And how would a aluminum can pierce into a building come out perfect on the other side then blow up.
JISINSANE3 1 year ago
@JISINSANE3 not only that , but the nose cones of these planes are made of a composite material that's NOT METAL, so how in the hell could it have made it all the way through the building and come out intact on the other side???
hauleywood 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JISINSANE3 all is possibile in the
d i g i t a l d o m a i n...
wsee 9 months ago
scam must stop, PROOF NEEDS TO BE REVEALED
sworteu 1 year ago
@chh5555 ... Just happens to resemble the profile of the nose? hahahaha. And then disappears and loses resemblance? A blatant munipulation of imagery pixels!!!! and you grew up watching the road runner cartoons... you must be a physics major.... or should we reason... psychological warfare major? your irrelevant and dismissed... go play with your leggos and GI Joe kid.( or barbie)
mrmoonshadow 1 year ago
@mrmoonshadow Damn, how did you know??? My cover is blown... yes I DO work for the government and part of my job is hanging out here at youtube spreading disinformation and creating doubt and confusion among you free thinkers. Well I guess it's back to the Secret Black Op Think Tank and try to come up with a better idea, jeeeez you guys are just toooo cunning!
chh5555 1 year ago
@chh5555 ... key words... free thinkers... yes and I love the REPUBLIC.. not the corporation... ie (corps) I am alive and well thank you....
mrmoonshadow 1 year ago
why does everyone call wtc7 "the smoking gun",surely the fact that all crash footage has been proven fake is the biggest clue to the govs/medias involvement.the original "live" footage was almost amateurish,footage that followed years later was better made but still had it's flaws.would the gov demolish the wtc with people inside...read "divided we stand" by eric darton and learn how the wtc was emptied of its tennant in the mid 90's and only virtual space later leased.
kansasinnovember 1 year ago
@simonshack
Maybe everyones passports flew up to the front protecting the shape of the plane for a few more moments???
ATSucks1 1 year ago 5
@ATSucks1
LOL ... :O) the indestructible passports, yeh...
simonshack 1 year ago 3
Simon this is damned good man. Thanks for making this "international view" presentation clear & concise. This is laser perfect.
losdodgers420 1 year ago 7
At 3:57, the flames should be on the right side of building (impact point).
A wing filled with kerosene is like a balloon filled with water;
it doesnt penetrate steel (square tubes of thick steel, about 1ft apart, in this case).
Howcome no wrekedge of a plane found at the bottom, on the street ?
MrPierrePhilippe 1 year ago
At 2:21 minutes in this video,you clearly see the image of the plane,
to BLEND in the building.
To me, it seem s , TOTAL PROOF this was forged.
DO I make sense, or is there another explanation ?
MrPierrePhilippe 1 year ago
We searching for THE truth,without passion and prejudice.
And whatever it might be in the end.
Humanity desserves it .
It s outrageous how much people are being "hypnotised" by mass medias.
MrPierrePhilippe 1 year ago
Comment removed
maxmook 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it looks like the pixel cloud after the nose comes out is just debris...
jasonC9595 1 year ago
@jasonC9595
It looks like you need to take another look.
simonshack 1 year ago 35
@simonshack I have you know, this is one of the absolute best vids made on this subject. Very nice work, thank you!
redcivicsi16 8 months ago 2
@jasonC9595
"Debris" which just so happens to be identical in shape and contrast to the cockpit of the "plane"
SteveFusionX 7 months ago
There is a theory that this "plane" was in reality a missile with hologram projectors attatched to it. now, i think thats a theory created by someone from the funny farm, but id like to hear everyones thoughts on this.
icesurf7 1 year ago
@icesurf7 NOT a theory...
the 'planes' were PROVEN 100% fake 5 years ago...see,
911 amateur pt 2 and september clues..
NOW the inevitable FAKE VICTIMS are being exposed...
911 memorial scam clones
911 honor the vicsims
911 actors
911 propaganda...
very compelling stuff!!!
wsee 1 year ago 8
good work
OriginalScratch 1 year ago
I used to be a plane hugger too.
rockstarofredondo 1 year ago
The 'nose out' video is very interesting for a number of reasons.
1. If the nose did come out the other side of the building it would have fallen to the ground.
2. The fade to black would have had to have been done by the station's vision switcher person. But why - there is no reason for it in live broadcast news.
3. The footage does not feature in any archives, yet it is the clearest shot of the second plane hitting the tower.
justUwatchme 1 year ago
On eye level perspective "FRAME 38" IS few degrees lower than "FRAME 15". you can compare the level of degreee @ 4.28 !
Realism911 1 year ago
Its sad a video lik dis has 23k views but a video with a dancing baby has 10 million+
GREAT VID THOUGH U HAVE SOME GREAT POINTS
DizzyDee863 1 year ago 7
you're good man thanks a million
nudracr 2 years ago 4
you've gone deeper down the rabit hole thank you
ninjashaun1337 2 years ago 2
There was huge explosion from below that made the earth shake like a earthquake s wave .
The street cracjed open and fire spewed out . Thsis was before the first building fell .
Google Captain Karin Deshore EMT why would she lie ?
SAYYOURROSARY 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SAYYOURROSARY
"There was huge explosion from below that made the earth shake like a earthquake s wave ."
This might explain that .. The US government is capable of anything.
Planet Earth the Latest Weapon of War
bariumblues*com/bertell_reveals_many_new_weapons*htm
straydog02 1 year ago
This was the mistake that will bing them down one day .
Dan Rather was not in the know
he would not have said those things .He was scum for other reasons ....no pass for him .
SAYYOURROSARY 2 years ago 3
Google "The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
LOOK UP : How to edit video.
NWOisAwesome 2 years ago
Someday......real soon,
The real people responsible for 9/11 will be confronted, tried and convicted for their crimes against humanity. I was in 7th grade when this happened. I'll never forget watcing this in math class. And I was young and ignorant, but now older and after seeing all the evidence and proof of the lies spat by mainstream media, im without a doubt convinced this was not the work of terrorists. "A PLANE hitting" the side of a building cant make it collaspe from the bottom.
onpointsalad 2 years ago 4
dont those buildings look like theyve been controlled demolitioned?
Peterpufferbelly 2 years ago
@onpointsalad -
"cant make it collaspe from the bottom. "
The towers collapsed from the top down. Have you ever seen the collapse?
nobraintheory 2 years ago
watch?v=nH8HY4vANIE
watch?v=PshUQPvCUF8
Knock out punch for debunkers on the Bridge fake footage!
Its quite simple!
seymourbutts3 2 years ago
فيظهر الكلب
(arabic for wag the dog)
piwacket33 2 years ago 4
i watched movie wag the dog! and its the same like 9/11 .. TV makes it!
F*ck this World...
sir4ki 2 years ago
Chefelvis : Several false clues have been inserted into the forged videos simply to introduce false leads : in French, it's called 'dépistage' and is a classic feature of any major psy-op. (The 'pods', btw, are not visible on all shots from beneath ).
It has also been proved that the 'flashes' were inserted on SOME VERSIONS OF THE SAME shots and not on others. The Naudet 1st hit, for instance, comes in versions with/and without a flash . So does the Hezarkhani 2nd hit.
simonshack 2 years ago
whatever hit the one side looks as if it was made to dump gas across the floor as a F/X
TheMeknow 2 years ago
The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe conclusively shows the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples.
mfriedlin 2 years ago
The new version of September Clues features mostly high grade, first-generation mpeg2 material from the HD footage once downloadable from the official TV archive org website. Regarding this FOX nose-out clip, no better versions are available as it never made it to the archives . In order to understand this matter fully, it is essential to watch my related research :
FOXED OUT part1
watch?v=vzCW197AqpM&fmt=18
FOXED OUT part2
watch?v=b9LURV-joLI&fmt=18
simonshack 2 years ago 10
Sent this to a new friend who wants to learn more about this. :-)
nameofthepen 2 years ago
At first I thought the no plane thing was loony. Your research definitely has me thinking...
I've also recently learned about Hyper Sonic Sound and the ability to place sonance wherever it is desired.
If audio effects can be placed anywhere, perhaps visual effects can, too.
Thanks muchly, simon.
barrywilliamsmb 2 years ago 47
If 6:35 is where the 'nose-out' should have taken place..........then WHERE IS THE HOLE where it supposedly came through??
tigerlamb007 2 years ago 4
Also, if the nose of the airplane made it through the building, wouldn't it have been found somewhere among the rubble? Once exiting, it would have continued away from the tower on a downward parabolic path and while it would have been covered/flattened by the eventual falling debris, it generally should have been recovered.
rocket881 2 years ago 3
Knowledge triumphs over all.
Thanks for sharing, friend, it's a great thing to think about.
RavenSword2014 2 years ago 7
Great job! The nose comes out the other side in perfect form, then disappears, just too far fetched, great analysis!
BamaKattt 3 years ago 4
by the way the music in sept clues and this video is beautiful there will be hell to pay 9/11/09 NYC and DC
tonydayna 3 years ago 3
brilliant thank you<3
tonydayna 3 years ago
Great work! Finally, something interesting to watch on youtube..
sdhy123 3 years ago 2
Where can be found the jason100 analysis of this?
LaBotSircle 3 years ago
simon, i have always wondered why you do not consider the jason100 analysis of this entire fox5 shot to be the most blatant video evidence of tv fakery and/or no planes. can you comment on this?
spiggitybap 3 years ago
i mean, your nose out theory is reasonable, but jason100's analysis is indisputable. you cannot argue that the plane existed when it didnt, and then it just SHOWED UP for the nose out shot. please, comment on why you push ANY theory harder than the jason100 clip.
spiggitybap 3 years ago
Please watch September Clues A... I respect very much jason100's analysis which certainly is not in contradiction with mine. Let there be a million videos to support and reinforce this subject - and maybe people will catch on. Don't you agree ?
simonshack 3 years ago
Simon where i find jason100's analysis ???
Thank you !!!
Still 15.000 views ?? Clearlly Youtube mess with our inteligence !
secretarul 3 years ago 2
So if there was jet airliner crashing into this tower then the damage had to be caused by explosions inside the building. To cause the damage as wide as it did at an angle would have required at least three or four floors to work from in lining up the explosives to form a plane like image from the damage. The occupants of thos offices would have had to know about it. Does an yone know who occupied the offices where the "entry" damage was done?
NewDirection4us 3 years ago
One theory has it that the plane approaching is some sort of graphic overlay, or like a video mix with another shot of the towers. But when the time came to line them up there was a problem and the "plane" overshot the tower. Thats why it quickly went to black screen for a second or so. I have to admit that the plane approach does look fake. On the other hand, the damage to the building in all shots and stills does look like plane damage.
NewDirection4us 3 years ago
Hi, thanks for the video. This is very interesting and clearly something is amiss. But I wondered if you could answer a few queries I have.
How can you explain the noise of the aircraft engines spooling up moments before impact?
Also what happened to the aircraft, passengers and crew who are now missing either way?
And how can we explain the cell phone calls they made if no-one was aboard any aircraft?
I`m open to suggestions as this is all very suspicious. Thanks.
Martin958 3 years ago
Martin958, sorry for late reply.
1 : The noise of the 'aircraft engines' is vastly different on all available 9/11 soundtracks.
2 : The FAA, BTS and NTSB paperwork linked to these airliners is replete of inconsistencies. No members of passenger families have come forward saying : "Hey ! My Dad died on one of these airplanes! Stop it!"
3. The cellphone calls were impossible to do from those airliners. They are just part of the official 9/11 propaganda.
simonshack 3 years ago
Hi Simon,
Thanks again for all the information. I`m very interested on some things I found on Youtube that could explain things.
I found one video with witnesses stating there were big grey aircraft with objects strapped to them: ?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related
Also there`s good evidence of passengers/crew being fed lines to say into phones on the promise of seeing their families before being murdered by the CIA: ?v=eqRYf6X2Cb0
Can you explain these for me? Thanks again.
Martin958 3 years ago
MR. Shack you are a god, i have DLed your videos and distribuded them threw out my city...we love you....thank you..
tonydayna 3 years ago 4
Funny how everyone says ''people say'' and ''there must have been'' about witnesses to the planes. I'm personally yet to find any witnesses that actually saw planes that day nor can any of my friends supply people they know who saw planes.
breando1 3 years ago 5
Ok so if there were no planes...than why do all the people say that there were planes.Further more there are other conspiracy documentaries that say it was an inside job but still stick with the planes:-??
Valandil00 3 years ago
An in-depth analysis of the eyewitness testimonies establishes that most people (who saw something at all) reported "small planes" of various sorts. Whatever hit the WTC was not a large object.
I will soon post a comprehensive review of this particular aspect of 9/11 on my thesocialserviceDOTit website.
simonshack 3 years ago
Ok thank you..your videos are very interesting!
Valandil00 3 years ago 2
haha the helicopter pilot is probably on the red list
Sature1985 3 years ago
Yes. please watch and listen to this ;
watch?v=P5PZxGsYNnY
simonshack 3 years ago
Who is to blame for the worlds tragedies? = Human beings & their greed for absolute power. There isn't only one culprit infact there's probably millions. So you people go on about seeking the truth and preaching the word but whats the point. You all know in your heart of hearts who's to blame.
KTtunstall89 3 years ago
Yes, we the people are partly to blame for our ignorance and perhaps apathy toward these issues. That is why we MUST act now. People must be shaken out of their damnable reverie of propaganda and WAKE UP to the cold hard truth. ONLY THEN can America be saved. Never has it been more urgent. Keep true to the TRUE America and fight for it! Only WE can stop this NWO...only WE can fight the good fight. We MUST fight, if not for outselves, then those who are unable to fight for liberty and freedom!
theopolis69 3 years ago
Im sure with or without the "dodgy videos" people actually saw a plane go into the buildings. Must have otherwise you would of heard about it by now. Good theory though I hope one day we get to the bottom of this enigmatic riddle of a puzzle.
KTtunstall89 3 years ago
It's unbelievable that this great work is still at ~ 12,884 !
VioGalante 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this doesn't prove anything. the problem is that the bbc and others showed early footage. this may well be delibertly done to add even more confusion to the matter.
only 3 things.
1. why are there numerous vids of private people showing planes.
2. that nose coming out might just be a dustcloud. ok, maybe it is even the nose, deformed on its way out.
3. wreckage of plane on the streets below.
allthough i respect the work of this person, it is not good for the truther movement.
sucktubez 3 years ago
sucktubez:
1. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES partF on my channel to find out just who these 'private people' were.
2.Have you watched this video at all ?
3. Please meet the wreckage here : SEPTEMBER CLUES EPILOGUE on my channel. If you believe the wreckage is legit, do you also believe in the various terrorists' passports found at all crash sites?
simonshack 3 years ago
watch his whole series before you say that dude
multiple plane flight paths for second hit is key
nokilt1 3 years ago 5
Very interesting video here. Good work.
Thank you very much.
mskydolphin
mskydolphin 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
GWBush flat out, refused to meet with the 9/11 commission by himself.
He refused to be interviewed under oath or have any transcripts or recordings made.
What was he hiding? What was he afraid of?
The truth is out there, but the official 9/11 story lacks credability. WE must research and be open to the possability that we have been lied to. More on you tube search,
Zeitgeist - The Movie: World Trade Center (Part 1 of 4)
GOOGLE>
ww w. 911rippleeffect. com
ww w. AE911Truth. org
mskydolphin 3 years ago
You know, Simon, my problem is the following:
Some of your claims in "september clues" or this video seem valid to me.
But remember, this is New York City.
What if only *one person* made a video showing no plane? Do you think they wouldn't find a way to publish it, send it to Alex or some of the other "911 truth" guys.
I know you say that this is due to police officers that confiscated every video camera on ground zero, but do you honestly believe the wouldn't be a single tape to escape that?
derPaterick 3 years ago
derPaterick
your question is addressed in the new version of September Clues soon to be released. Stay tuned.
simonshack 3 years ago
there is video of no plane I saw it.
dieyoubastards 3 years ago 3
look up "CBS and NBC both miss 'plane' hitting".
dieyoubastards 3 years ago 3
Anyone who even NEEDS to see this frame by frame as proof that 9/11 was a total fake is an idiot who MUST INSULTINGLY believe that American engineers + architects built the Towers out of SAND!
Stop being in denial that MONSTERS rule USA
idasputem 3 years ago 2
i think fritzzay should be in gitmo for helping the terrorists cover up.:)
horror11 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think simonshack is a terrorist....
fritzzay 3 years ago
Well, I once stole a candybar in a mini-market at age 12. If that makes me a terrorist, I hope I at least qualify for the right to lawyer assistance.
simonshack 3 years ago
Well looks like bull$&!% to me - and I don't mean this video. How can these anomaly's be passed over and ignored? Yet I listen to Alex and he refers to this issue as dis-info. Its like the forbidden subject of truthers or something. Lets not f$£% about all this footage stinks as does the 7/7 London CCTV 'evidence'. I fail to see why this is so invalid or taboo to talk about. Our news showed about 10 sec's of footage for like 24 hours, that in itself smells like a rat to me.
StealthModeLondon 3 years ago 4
How can empirical factfinding be disinfo ? To discredit and attack this research is the work of gatekeepers - and there seems to be a whole bunch of them...Think for yourself, always.
simonshack 3 years ago
Well that's what I'm starting to realize man does this mean Alex is trying to start a manageable and controllable revolt? His stance on the tv fakery seems completely irrational. RIP William Copper
StealthModeLondon 3 years ago 2
jones is a disinfo agent, he never tries to debunk tv fakery instead he diffame any1 who asks questions.
thats not a helpful behaviour if some1 wants to find the truth,dont you think?
let alone all this bshitters who just comment to tell us how retarded we are to not believe the fairy tail with the 19 nailcutter terrorists lol.
horror11 3 years ago 2
Way to go, expose these Luciferian Jesuit/SMOM NWO Monsters.
Make no mistake about this, all roads lead to Rome and The Jesuit General!
leonvoltaire 3 years ago 2
Hi Simon, I just thought of this. The white dashes remind me of the white dashes that flicker along the edge of the WTC in the NBC "chopper" shot of the explosion, no matter how the view tilts (one line flashes where the explosion ends up happening, and I've never seen artifacts like that). Hmm....
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like how you point out source quality artifacts as evidence for "fakery" instead of getting a better quality rip.
Good job mr. 9/11 Debunker.
kkirT 3 years ago
Also, we need to abolish all US support for the racist, fascist Jewish State of Israel; totally redefine the role of the US military, removing US troops from all overseas missions that do not defend against an immediate threat to US soil; and redefine US foreign policy to become essentially noninterventionist.
GregoryFFegel 3 years ago 23
"Things must change." True. But things will not change without a real Revolution in the USA that gets rid of the CIA, gets rid of the Pentagon as we know it, and completely restructures the US government. All of the US government perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks must hang, even if that means executing thousands of people. Anything less would be "pissing into the wind."
GregoryFFegel 3 years ago 6
good vid 5*. I second the part about watching september clues. It is a worthy watch.
ve240 3 years ago 4
What is the dotted line with two offset markers? And why is it there?
SKYfox911 3 years ago 2
I thought the plane banked really hard. Maybe not.
rustyglock212 3 years ago
You're quite right. The "plane" banks as if it's making a very sharp left turn. This is another point which destroys the credibilty of this shot :
A plane banking that sharply (profile shows one wing sharply up and the other sharply down) would be changing direction at an extremely fast rate. For a real aircraft to do such a steep turn - ultimately hitting the tower almost dead center - is frankly in the realm of science fiction.
simonshack 3 years ago
thank you for this video. i used to think people were crazy for thinking the government would be behind the deaths of thousands of american people, but in reality i was the crazy one.
RoyalMessup 3 years ago 6
The US government does not control media video feeds across networks, especially in foreign media (Fox is News Corp, Murdoch, major shareholder, Saudi Arabia). Theyre waving the American flag while we attack the enemies of the international petroleum cartel. And we borrow the money from them to do it. :) ps. the cartel is primarily anglo-dutch controlled , bp-shell.
Ecothearcy 3 years ago
either it came out the other side or it didnt, both cannot be correct or real. no matter which is the fake, the media lies either way.
may "live" vids of that day contradict each other... so dont be silly-
giantshadows 3 years ago 4
What has FOX got to hide?
Isnt the mantra of the WAR on TERROR invasion of privacy supporters "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about"!!
Well then, FOX you better start worrying...
getoffutube 4 years ago 7
Super great work!!!! Continue to find fake things!!!! your videos are amazing!! bye
Morrison2373 4 years ago 7
amazing good work.
too bad that this wasnt correct in september clues and allowed the shills to question the whole footage.
but now its clear for everyone .
horror11 4 years ago 4
what delay?
Ackdacka 4 years ago
I think you're on the money here, where is the delay on this shot for the "explosion" that comes out. There is some delay on other shots I think. Also, can you verify, that the plane is moving at the same rate for the timming when it should exit?
fasdl 4 years ago 2
if no plane went inside how could one exit?
Ackdacka 4 years ago
inside job!!!!ganz klar!!
nimao100 4 years ago 2
what about the nose out from the other side?
radharc24 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I see a plane traveling at high speed go straight through a building. Oh, it must be a missle, right. Tell that to the passengers of the jets that crashed into the towers. Oh, thats right there PLANE hit a BUILDING.
lbisurfer812 4 years ago
a carbon-fibered nose-cone CANNOT pass through two sets of steel-framed walls and a steel core and come out the other side INTACT but if you believe that I have a business partner named santa who will broker a deal for a bridge spanning the east river-the passengers(many of whom were probably made up) are another story entirely-and it's "their" plane, not "there" plane
whoiswhoiskilltown 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The plane was going 490 mph
lbisurfer812 4 years ago
problem is, there is no exit hole. i thought there was . google "wtc exit hole". i feel dum. ozzybinoswald said i was close to heresy. so i took a long, 3 week look. I am not seeing things clearly. no one can figure it out. no one can see clearly and flight 175 was not what hit the wtc.
hypnotstcollector 4 years ago 3
"The plane was going 490 mph"
Really, Ibisurfer812?
Search for Jeffs (of pumpitout) call at Boeings.
A plane (the alleged one) can´t go that fast at this altitude, and Boeing says so!
Bartholomew111111 4 years ago 3
Yeah it's very true, that why they cruse at 35ooo ft where the air is thin, less resistance on the airframe, drag on the engines etc. The max velocity of a 767 in level flight at 700 to 800 ft is approx 250 - 300 mph, if it was nearly accomplishing its max cruse at 800 ft the plane would be being ripped apart and the resistance on the control surfaces would make the plane uncontrollable.
FormalScience 4 years ago 6
And remember these planes were allegedly being flown by "pilots" with no experience in a commercial airliner and very little flight experience at all.
FormalScience 4 years ago 6
WAG THE DOG??
chickpea0007 4 years ago 3
JoeCraine
in the video's info (the same) there is a link to a picture that convince me...
definitely there isn't an "exit hole",
the nose out is unreal
thanks for the great tip (StillDiggin blog)
youzurk 4 years ago
youzurk 4 years ago
the "nose out" maybe the MISSILE
watch?v=gG1aaMSjcRk&NR=1
in the last minute of this video
there is a very good zoom,
please, watch it
thanks
youzurk 4 years ago
at 02:45
youzurk 4 years ago
The problem is youzurk, there isn't an 'exit hole' for that missile.
sidlittle 4 years ago 4
good observation
youzurk 4 years ago 2
All the supposed 911 planes were ditched into the Atlantic. I hear a gun butt knock at my door--MOSSAD agents!
geo1671 4 years ago
I will visit this video often and rate it five stars. A work of art. Please continue to expose the biggest lie in human history. Keep of the fight, keep posting videos for justice!
japanesexxxxxxxxx 4 years ago
Exellent work. Thank you, you are a true genius.
Awaken2Truth 4 years ago 2
Talk about wagging the dog!! Where's the bag of Doritos disquised as a baby? Isn't there another piece of footage showing the nose out? Isn't it the shot with a streaking F-111 or rod zooming downwards?
piasillo 4 years ago
Holy shit.
This is incredible.
Excellent work, my friend! i must admit that i feel as if i've been raped by my country...
ooagentmm 4 years ago 4
awsome analysis . thx for all your work
horror11 4 years ago
Excellent work. It is proven fact that all of the "plane" footage of 9/11 is fake. Turning the video weapon around and using it on the perps will undoubtedly help to make that fact become more widely accepted.
911Logic 4 years ago 3
Things seem back to YT normal
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
alawson911
(tried to post this on your video, but, of course, you block facts!)
SimonShack correctly characterized you.
You are the attacker (see the reason SS blocked you here). You are the one who moves the goal posts (see the responses you made to my challenge).
No guts!
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago 3