REALLY I DON´T UNDERSTAND THIS VIDEO, FIRST THAT ALL SKIN SHOULDN´T BE A THEME OF TALK BECAUSE WE ARE THE SAME NOT MATTER SKIN, RELIGION OR SEX. SO U CAN BE WHITE O BLACK AND FALL IN LOVE AND NOBODY HAS TO CRITIZE U
SECOND I THINK CRISTHIAN PEOPLE . PEOPLE WHO BELIEVES AND READ THE BYBLE, THEY SHOULD KNOW THAT IN THE BIBLE SAYS LOVE ANOTHER PEOPLOE AS U WOULD LIKE THEY DO WITH U , SO CRITIZING GAY PEOPLE ONLY SHOW U ARE NOT RIGHT AND U HAVE TO FOLLOW UR STEPS WITHOUT SEE ANOTHER´S
It is my belief- that should someone disagrees with something implied, written or verbal-- it should not be met with overtures of LIES, intended to discredit. But rather a truthful banter of ones position on the subject matter. While remaining a good character.
Just to say one more thing: Black people can never change their colour. Civil Rights- was just that, claiming a Black Person had just as much civil rights to food, shelter & safety, education as a White person.
Civil Rights activist attempted to unveil the lies of racism. All men are created equal.
An homosexual may never appear to be homosexual. It is something that can be missed/ hidden. BLACKS can not hide!
Black people can never change their color - though they can bleach their skin or reshape their noses if prejudice deludes them into doing so. Gay people cannot change their orientation - though they can disguise it if similarly oppressed. None of us should have to hide who we are. Black, white, gay, straight, left handed, right handed - we are all created equal (whatever the biblical 'Curse of Ham' or biblical condemnation of the left hand implies). All these people deserve Civil Rights.
Black people- even if they dye/bleach their skin, change their noses/hair- will never ever be WHITE!
A homosexual can be bi-sexual or even decide to be heterosexual/ or even straight acting.
In fact a block at work had girls chasing him down, he never responded to their advances. He was a mystery until the day he Left & explained himself! There was bunches that were openly gay & were treated like 'crème de la crème' so it was a mystery why he wasnt open.
1. Being an inter-racial married couple is obvious - and so is being a gay married couple. Both have faced unjust discrimination.
2. True. Black people can look white but not BE white. Gay people can pretend to be straight but not BE straight. Gay is our inner sexual orientation not our outward behavior or form of body language - so it may not be obvious. Both black and gay people have a right to respect for who they are.
3. These rights are obvious - whether confirmed or denied by the Bible.
Legally, marriage is a contract that is recognized by the Government for administrative and tax purposes. The legality of the marriage has nothing to do with whether the partners are Christian, Jewish, Moslem or atheist. The Bible permits marrying 13 year old girls and having many wives, beating your wife and preventing her from speaking in public. The Government rightly ignores these principles. The Bible opposes inter-racial marriage - again the Government rightly ignores this.
maitriparamita- Your tripping serriously. Please give scripts from the Bible backing up your own opinion of the Bible... which I do not believe you have one.
Marriage has never been for 'administrative or tax purposes.'
What are you on?
The Bible never, ever- opposed 'inter-racial marriage'- If that was so.. MOSES couldn't have married Mirrian. David could not marry Beth-sheba, etc.. In fact what the Bible is against is marriage outside of the 'faith.'
The verses WIDELY use by many American churches to oppose inter-racial marriage (or 'miscegenation' as they called it) in the 1950s and 60s were: Genesis 24:3 Genesis 28:1 Exodus 34:12-16 Deuteronomy 7:3,4 Deuteronomy 7:3,4 Exodus 34:16 Deuteronomy 7:4 Joshua 23:12,13 Judges 3:6,7 From a GOVERNMENT perspective (not a Church perspective) marriage is a legal and financial contract that entitles married people to various legal and tax benefits - andhas nothing to do with their sex lives etc.
From a governmental perspective-- 2007-2009, your definition of a Civil Marriage is right.
However, before the amendments: Marriage is a social, religious, spiritual or legal union of individuals that creates kinship.
'Civil marriage' is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction. 'If recognized by the state'.
There will always be a difference, because 'samesex marriage' is an abomination that may be tollerated.
As long as the *Government* recognizes peoples rights I don't care what a few bigots or bigoted church groups think privately. The KKK and some other Christian groups still oppose inter-racial marriage - but who cares? They can no longer prevent the President's parents or anyone else from living in a happy loving relationship.
Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives. Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Abraham married his half-sister Sarah when she was about 12/13. In Genesis 16:2 Sarah asks Abraham to have sex with her servant Hagar in order to have a child. This was the model for Jewish and Christian marriage for centuries. The Church banned polygamy in about 300AD but many sects have since used the Bible to support it - most recently the Mormons.
The importance of marriage is emphasised by Jesus:
'But from the beginning of creation, God made them male & female. For this reason a man shall leave his father & mother & be joined to his wife & the two shall become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate. (Mark 10:6-9)
Marriage is suppose to encourage faithfulness. One partner for life.
The many wives cause the breakdown in the spiritual lives of these men! True.
The Bible on preventing women/wives from speaking in public:
1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence"
The Bible on the duty of a man to buy a virgin if he rapes her:
Deut 22:28-29 "If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife...."
End of discussion. You think a suitable punishment for a man who rapes a woman is for him to have to buy her from her father. I'm confident that 99% of people reading that will realize that you are sadistic, sexist and insane.
''IF'' this world was not so corupt, then just like the threat of Prison/ Death Row is to deter such behaviour, (I'm saying) it would possilbly cause rapist & adulters to think differently!
Contrary to your idea that 'I'm' sanctioning a religious mandate/ law on such a secular nation!
A religious person with conviction & who believes in the Bible could see the correlation I was making.
BUT basically, what you are insinuating is YOU, believe youre more wise on human nature, than God!
I can make better moral judgements than a bunch of half-civilized bedouin nomads living in the deserts of Iraq 4,000 years ago. THEY wrote the bible - and I am wiser than them. Since then we have abandoned their practice of slavery, oppression of women, sale of children and public stonings. I know that that is progress - even though the Bible doesn't say so.
If a wife committed adultery (or was raped) her family was required to stone her to death on their doorstep.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 "Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die"
Beating your wife: I think you're off on this one!
If a wife willfully commits adultery- 22:20+ But if the accusation is true & the young woman was not a virgin, the men of her city must bring the young woman to the door of her fathers house & stone her to death, for she has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by behaving like a prostitute while living in her fathers house. In this way you will purge evil from among you.
So you're basically happy with that biblical law about stoning women, are you? [The US Government is apparently a bit unhappy with the idea of implementing this law]. My point is that the government is right to ignore biblical laws against inter-racial marriage and any biblical laws against homosexuality or gay marriage - and the government is right to ignore biblical laws on child brides, polygamy, selling your wife or silencing her. Marriage law should not discriminate racially or sexually.
It is my belief- that should someone disagrees with something implied, written or verbal-- it should not be met with overtures of LIES, intended to discredit. But rather a truthful banter of ones position on the subject matter. While remaining a good character.
REALLY I DON´T UNDERSTAND THIS VIDEO, FIRST THAT ALL SKIN SHOULDN´T BE A THEME OF TALK BECAUSE WE ARE THE SAME NOT MATTER SKIN, RELIGION OR SEX. SO U CAN BE WHITE O BLACK AND FALL IN LOVE AND NOBODY HAS TO CRITIZE U
SECOND I THINK CRISTHIAN PEOPLE . PEOPLE WHO BELIEVES AND READ THE BYBLE, THEY SHOULD KNOW THAT IN THE BIBLE SAYS LOVE ANOTHER PEOPLOE AS U WOULD LIKE THEY DO WITH U , SO CRITIZING GAY PEOPLE ONLY SHOW U ARE NOT RIGHT AND U HAVE TO FOLLOW UR STEPS WITHOUT SEE ANOTHER´S
Davichooriginal22 5 days ago
The day will come.....
GaGatheSaint 1 year ago
Well lets see
being in an interracial marriage is a choice
but you cant help being gay
so I guess people have a point when they say its not the same
l7ary 2 years ago
Are we talking same definitions or the same fight?
PrinceOfBabylon 2 years ago
marriage is nothing more than legally binding dating
Kingtunice 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is my belief- that should someone disagrees with something implied, written or verbal-- it should not be met with overtures of LIES, intended to discredit. But rather a truthful banter of ones position on the subject matter. While remaining a good character.
Seywah 2 years ago
Just to say one more thing: Black people can never change their colour. Civil Rights- was just that, claiming a Black Person had just as much civil rights to food, shelter & safety, education as a White person.
Civil Rights activist attempted to unveil the lies of racism. All men are created equal.
An homosexual may never appear to be homosexual. It is something that can be missed/ hidden. BLACKS can not hide!
Your rolling upon the wrong ticket.
You come under 'Human Rights Act'.
Seywah 2 years ago
Black people can never change their color - though they can bleach their skin or reshape their noses if prejudice deludes them into doing so. Gay people cannot change their orientation - though they can disguise it if similarly oppressed. None of us should have to hide who we are. Black, white, gay, straight, left handed, right handed - we are all created equal (whatever the biblical 'Curse of Ham' or biblical condemnation of the left hand implies). All these people deserve Civil Rights.
maitriparamita 2 years ago 9
Black people- even if they dye/bleach their skin, change their noses/hair- will never ever be WHITE!
A homosexual can be bi-sexual or even decide to be heterosexual/ or even straight acting.
In fact a block at work had girls chasing him down, he never responded to their advances. He was a mystery until the day he Left & explained himself! There was bunches that were openly gay & were treated like 'crème de la crème' so it was a mystery why he wasnt open.
Being BLACK is obvious!
Seywah 2 years ago
1. Being an inter-racial married couple is obvious - and so is being a gay married couple. Both have faced unjust discrimination.
2. True. Black people can look white but not BE white. Gay people can pretend to be straight but not BE straight. Gay is our inner sexual orientation not our outward behavior or form of body language - so it may not be obvious. Both black and gay people have a right to respect for who they are.
3. These rights are obvious - whether confirmed or denied by the Bible.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
You're cute :)
YouStoleMyTube 1 year ago
Legally, marriage is a contract that is recognized by the Government for administrative and tax purposes. The legality of the marriage has nothing to do with whether the partners are Christian, Jewish, Moslem or atheist. The Bible permits marrying 13 year old girls and having many wives, beating your wife and preventing her from speaking in public. The Government rightly ignores these principles. The Bible opposes inter-racial marriage - again the Government rightly ignores this.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
maitriparamita- Your tripping serriously. Please give scripts from the Bible backing up your own opinion of the Bible... which I do not believe you have one.
Marriage has never been for 'administrative or tax purposes.'
What are you on?
The Bible never, ever- opposed 'inter-racial marriage'- If that was so.. MOSES couldn't have married Mirrian. David could not marry Beth-sheba, etc.. In fact what the Bible is against is marriage outside of the 'faith.'
Read your Bible & quote properly.
Seywah 2 years ago
maitriparamita 2 years ago
From a governmental perspective-- 2007-2009, your definition of a Civil Marriage is right.
However, before the amendments: Marriage is a social, religious, spiritual or legal union of individuals that creates kinship.
'Civil marriage' is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction. 'If recognized by the state'.
There will always be a difference, because 'samesex marriage' is an abomination that may be tollerated.
Seywah 2 years ago
As long as the *Government* recognizes peoples rights I don't care what a few bigots or bigoted church groups think privately. The KKK and some other Christian groups still oppose inter-racial marriage - but who cares? They can no longer prevent the President's parents or anyone else from living in a happy loving relationship.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
The Bible on Marriage:
Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives. Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Abraham married his half-sister Sarah when she was about 12/13. In Genesis 16:2 Sarah asks Abraham to have sex with her servant Hagar in order to have a child. This was the model for Jewish and Christian marriage for centuries. The Church banned polygamy in about 300AD but many sects have since used the Bible to support it - most recently the Mormons.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
The importance of marriage is emphasised by Jesus:
'But from the beginning of creation, God made them male & female. For this reason a man shall leave his father & mother & be joined to his wife & the two shall become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate. (Mark 10:6-9)
Marriage is suppose to encourage faithfulness. One partner for life.
The many wives cause the breakdown in the spiritual lives of these men! True.
Seywah 2 years ago
The Bible on preventing women/wives from speaking in public:
1 Timothy 2:12 "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence"
The Bible on the duty of a man to buy a virgin if he rapes her:
Deut 22:28-29 "If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife...."
maitriparamita 2 years ago
The woman is not head of the Man! God created Man to rule & for women to support their decisions. Due to the Fall of Man!
Unfortunately 'Eve' was seduced by the evil one, & the daughters of Eve can never lived it down..
H/E, Husbands ought to Love their wives, & be willing to lay down their lives for their wives as Christ did for the church.
I think rapist & adulters may think different IF these laws were actively in effect. Less promiscuity!
Ud want faithfulness in ur relationship!
Seywah 2 years ago
End of discussion. You think a suitable punishment for a man who rapes a woman is for him to have to buy her from her father. I'm confident that 99% of people reading that will realize that you are sadistic, sexist and insane.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
''IF'' this world was not so corupt, then just like the threat of Prison/ Death Row is to deter such behaviour, (I'm saying) it would possilbly cause rapist & adulters to think differently!
Contrary to your idea that 'I'm' sanctioning a religious mandate/ law on such a secular nation!
A religious person with conviction & who believes in the Bible could see the correlation I was making.
BUT basically, what you are insinuating is YOU, believe youre more wise on human nature, than God!
Seywah 2 years ago
I can make better moral judgements than a bunch of half-civilized bedouin nomads living in the deserts of Iraq 4,000 years ago. THEY wrote the bible - and I am wiser than them. Since then we have abandoned their practice of slavery, oppression of women, sale of children and public stonings. I know that that is progress - even though the Bible doesn't say so.
maitriparamita 2 years ago 5
Beating your wife.
If a wife committed adultery (or was raped) her family was required to stone her to death on their doorstep.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 "Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die"
maitriparamita 2 years ago
Beating your wife: I think you're off on this one!
If a wife willfully commits adultery- 22:20+ But if the accusation is true & the young woman was not a virgin, the men of her city must bring the young woman to the door of her fathers house & stone her to death, for she has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by behaving like a prostitute while living in her fathers house. In this way you will purge evil from among you.
JUST WATCH MAURY TO UNDERSTAND THIS ONE.
A husband BUT, NOT Dad!
Seywah 2 years ago
So you're basically happy with that biblical law about stoning women, are you? [The US Government is apparently a bit unhappy with the idea of implementing this law]. My point is that the government is right to ignore biblical laws against inter-racial marriage and any biblical laws against homosexuality or gay marriage - and the government is right to ignore biblical laws on child brides, polygamy, selling your wife or silencing her. Marriage law should not discriminate racially or sexually.
maitriparamita 2 years ago
It is my belief- that should someone disagrees with something implied, written or verbal-- it should not be met with overtures of LIES, intended to discredit. But rather a truthful banter of ones position on the subject matter. While remaining a good character.
Seywah 2 years ago
you're doing a great job, cuz.
:)
flute7777 2 years ago