Viera NeoPDP - Leave motion blur behind with 600Hz NeoPDP

[miasmablk]

goodbye motion blur hello phosphor lag

[johneymute]

600hz my ass it,s just fake,what they actualy dit is overclocking,the pdp and possibly future the lcd,plasma proccesor to increase response time,it also copies existing frames to match 600hz,but simpy does NOT make all sources look smoother,i remember connecting my nes to my 100hz tv ,i sew alot of motion flickering unlike with tv programmes.

[PerceptEye]

When watching a blueray movie via HDMI input, a very irritating phosphor lag is visible on NeoPDP 42" set. Especially when viewing a fast moving bright object in front of a dark background.

[4ourTimber]

LOL 200hz is enough already...

[speedaddict2008]

Now they gotta film movies at 600+ fps, and make games run at 600+ fps in order to look just fine on that TV.

[jbred00]

lol i love how everyone is destroying sony first microsoft with that xbox thing now panasonic sony spent loads of money making that 200hz advert because it was finally there time to show they are still it then 3 seconds later a panasonic add 600hz poor sony

[jaychristie909]

Yes but all over-37" Panasonic TVs are plasma. I, personally, would never buy a plasma and therefore makes it incredibly hard to purchase a large Panasonic TV, let alone a 600hz TV.

They probably cost a flip load more than Sony's Motionflow TVs.

[mennie123]

What da hell u talking about 200hz is already invisible for a human so why the hell there is 600hz people are not able to see difference over 200hz, its just 600hz to let people like u buy it, sorry for bad english but whatever

[MsFlyingBeast]

@jbred00 Well, that's not completly true. Sony's 200hz lcd is recalculating new frames, while 600hz is breaking frames apart and showing tham 3 times faster, but seperated (for better colors), because led have good colors without any aditional only color improvement. After all they are even more power efficient than plasma is. Now this all depend on what costumers will decide. But keep in mind that this are two totally different technologies, that can't be compared that easy.

[jbred00]

@MsFlyingBeast hmm, ok i see but its still irelevant as anything past 200hz is invisable to the naked eye (motion wise)

[RedCaughtHanded]

@jbred00 Yes, I guess, but our eyes can only pick up 300hz / 300fps (which is basically what it means). Better buy a Sony afterall!

Even though more people will have a PlayStation.

[jbred00]

@RedCaughtHanded well science says "the human eye cannot differentiat on frame rates above 23fps. however most people will see a difference between video of 120fps and even 24fps. its variable depending on the given person. 300fps is not the same as 300hz lol