Added: 4 years ago
From: duPontREGISTRY
Views: 571,222
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,164)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the Veyron is over $1,000,000. Viper isn't even close.

  • 16.4 means 16cyl 4 turbos

  • The 16.4 means 16cyl 4 turbos

  • Is it mph?

  • Comment removed

  • Show the view from inside the Bugatti, where the guy is sipping a cup of coffee listening to the news during that same race.

  • HOLD IT HOLD IT

  • there is a point where adding more power and speed doesn't continue adding value to the car in my mind. I would rather have the veyron even though it's slow in this stupid test.

  • 8L vs 8.4L  (nothing impressive here)

    16cl vs 10cl

    4 turbos vs 2 turbos

    10 radiators vs 1 -2core radiator

    I love both cars but something about the viper that i just love...

  • @xXCHICAGO71Xx i thought the veyron is 16.4? or its just me

  • @meleniify i searched it it was an 8L i also thought it was a 16.4 im guessing its a virtual displacement.

  • Comment removed

  • @jetpoweredgriffin totally agree with ya. Would love to own a Daytona! Those cars are sick. My neighbor use to own one and it was bad ass, it was the hemi orange.

  • @KY241HELLYEA I am VERY partial to the Wingcars. They are the forgotten Supercar. Had there been further development, I believe that they would have become an entirely new form of high performance car. Supercars tend to be hard to tell apart from well-built kit cars if you drive by a parking lot full of them. The 2012 Veyron has a drag coefficient of.34 . The 1969 Dodge Daytona had a drag coefficient of .28 . They were the Ultimate Factory Hot Rod of their time... and perhaps STILL are
  • Considering the tires on the Veyron are $70,000 installed and can be done only at the factory, I'll take the Venom. I'd take a '69 Hemi Daytona before either one. The tires themselves are $25,000 on a pallet. The Veyron is much more complicated and can be considered tuned. 1,000HP? You think just because it's "stock" it's not "tuned"? What'd you think all those million$ are for? Floormats? The Veyron transmission is $120,000. Think about what you'd rather get and still have cash left over!
  • @jetpoweredgriffin All cars are tuned before they are produced otherwise they would not know whats going to happen when driven.

  • @klink I was referring to "tuned" in the contemporary sense- modified to increase power. The Veyron is considered "stock" but is Quad-Turbocharged and pushing 1,000HP The Venom is no longer a "stock" Viper-it's Twin-Turbocharged and also about 1,000HP They are both running at similar trim. One is "stock".... one is not. The cheaper one is faster and MUCH less trouble to run the other one. Viper service,stock or modified, is generally available worldwide. Veyron service is definitely not.
  • in the take off the venom will eat the veyron but in the long run the veyron will eventually catch up and smoke the venom

  • they show a picture of a viper and call it a venom...??????

  • With so many dumbasses driving out there I'd rather buy the Venom and have it bump into at a parking lot that have the same thing happen to the Veyron.

  • The Veyron may have a fast as fuck top speed, but it's not all that great considering it is a W16 quad turbocharged car... a V10 that weighs right around 3000 lbs just rocked it.

  • and id still take the veyron

  • to bad u need to say your priers to drive the dodge to 200 that quickly...

  • Dextland........ Lol I hope your talking about the car with the w16 with 4 turbos that goes through extensive tuning at the factory before it even gets to the owner?

  • fully loaded luxury supercar vs a car that is going to need a part replased every two days. Quick Bias question if u had to own one of them for a week what will u pick?

  • @nsang exactly everyone says the venom gt is a lot faster and yes it is but for the luxury and the reliablitiy and the lifestyle you have to take the veyron

  • @nsang Exactly my thinking, this is apples vs oranges, the Veyron is a production car, albeit a very special one, and the Viper Venom is a modified car, only based on the production car. Also, as you quite rightly pointed out, the Veyron is likely to be way more reliable and has a much nicer interior. I'd take the Veyron any day, as long as someone else was paying to insure it!

  • @wendighoul Except when you need a new set of tires they are $40,000 USD for the veyron or any other replacement part. I would say the viper is more reliable.

  • @roberto125919 A stock viper maybe, this is a heavily modified Venom by Henessey, a very small tuning house. If any of their custom parts breaks... it may not even be possible to get a replacement.

  • @wendighoul lol a veyron costs a fortune to keep matinece on its not even worth it 1 bolt is $100 screw that

  • @TransAmFTW And what, you think a Hennesey is gonna be any better?  Bugatti, supported by VolkswagenAG are a huge multi-billion dollar car manufacturer, Henessey is like 3 guys in a shack in Arkansas. At least you'll be able to GET the parts for your Bugatti. For Chirssakes, your handle glorifies a freakin' PONTIAC, what happened to them again?

  • @wendighoul lol uh bugatti matience costs over 100k a year to keep up a vemon viper lol it just has aftermarket parts on a viper you think there unique lol you need to learn some about performance packages kid they use aftermarket parts and make there own package put a badge on it and sell it and they shut down pontiac simply for the fact of sales... they sell alot but not as much as chevy why... cuz there purly a sports car brand chevy sells wider variety so naturally theyd make more

  • @wendighoul and ontop of that pontiac was one of the best for performance look at there engine any pointiac built straight up smokes most others so stop bein a moron stupid prick

  • @TransAmFTW Yeah, 'casue I'm the moron! The world world bought Pontiacs, everybody loved them! They didn't have to steal their only succesful cars of the last 20 years from Holden or anything! They were loved SO MUCH that , not only do they still exist, they are the best-selling car complany in the world. Oh wait... That's all exactly backwards. They were shit, and now they're gone, no one outside of the hick-states cares...

  • @wendighoul hmm there evn now ranked one of the highest selling cars of all time due and seriously whats your propblem i merely stated buggattis were expesive then you attack me get a life you prick youre clearly a blind fool you know nothing about cars thats evident and grow up i did nohing to you an youre bein a ass insulting me

  • @TransAmFTW your memory isn't very good, you need to stop huffing gasoline. I never once isulted you(before this), I insulted PONTIACS, and only after YOU jumped in to a conversation that you were not invited into, and which had nothing to do with you. You can be a Pontiac fanboy all you want, they were shit, no one outisde North America bought any, and they went belly-up FOR A REASON. OH BTW of the 50 best-selling cars of all time exactly NONE were pontiacs, I'll send you the link.

  • @wendighoul are you mentally challeneged or cant read? lmao the grand am is on that list buddy and you were insulting my name so thus insulting me for what i chose as a name and since i was merly saying bugatti is expensive to keep up with then you got an attitude are you that much in denial?

  • @TransAmFTW Ooops, you're right, Grand Am was on that list, in the 40s, but no Firebird or Trans Am. The fact remains, you stuck your nose in where it wasn't wanted, if as a result it gets out of joint, then maybe you should be more careful where you stick it. Yes Bugattis are expensive to maintain, because they are a quality product! When they need a new part it is expensive, yes, but that's because they are quality parts, and you need them WAY LESS OFTEN.

  • @TransAmFTW Ever heard the expression "you get what you pay for?". Well, this is a perfect example. You can pick a cheap car that is cheap to fix and will need frequent repairs, OR you can pick an expensive car that is expensive to maintain but needs little maintenance. I do agree that all in all a Pontiac is cheaper to own and maintain that a Bugatti, but (if I had the money) I would consider it to be worthwhile. Can we agree to disagree?

  • @wendighoul okay, you take the Veyron and i'll smoke you in my Venom ;)

  • @wendighoul If I could get ANY car made by Hennessey, I would take it over the Veyron. Who gives a shit about interior? I like that raw, shit your pants kind of power.

  • To me sounds like the venom spun a shit load

  • Everyone is butthurt the venom beat the bugatti, its hilarious. Let me get you guys some Midol

  • tuned vs. untuned

  • @dexyland The difference is you CAN actually legitimately tune a venom (viper) what can you do to the veyron ? Exhaust, nitrous, ECU maybe ?

  • @CMI1986X64 prob the veyron is so good the only thing better they could do is make the ss veyron

  • @dexyland 225k vs over 1 mil.....

  • @randomradicalstuff cool i know lots of cars for wayy less than 1 mil that can go over 200mph u dont put a built car against a stock car. now if this was against a 427 with a t77 turbo well see who wins then

  • @dexyland the supra would get its ass kicked. as for the bugatti being stock??? lmaoo its got 2 engines and 4 turbos....

  • @TJDeadkid SMH i dont know where to begin so im just gonna say where does a supra come into play??? and stock= dialed down. That is all, i dont wanna waste my time on you tube kids.

  • @dexyland oh my bad. fail on my part. you meant vette right?? :P all i say was t77 and assumed supra. my bad

  • @TJDeadkid Dont assume it would be a vette but the car (out of many) was a completely overhauled camaro just one of many modified cars that shouldnt be paired with a stock car.

  • @TJDeadkid Stock means from the factory. Not aftermarket tuning.

  • @dexyland yea but compare their prices!!!!!!! Hennessey way cheaper

  • @dexyland That veyron is tuned for 1 million dollars it better be.The new Veyron is faster has more horsepower as well both the new and older veyron have the same times just the top end of the newer veyron goes 258mph.If i was the riches person in the world i still wouldn't buy a veyron.It's a awesome car just doesn't do it for me.

  • @dexyland And which one is not tuned?

  • Thumb Up Thiss !!! Veyron 0-100-0mph in 9.8sec >>Hennessey Viper and GT1000 0-100-0mph in 13.5 Sec !!! What NoW ?

  • @CanijAsa can you afford either>

  • why do i have the feeling that the viper has been all emptied out and the veyron remained as standard. if you get rid of all the luxury on the veyron the viper has no chance. and its after 200 mph when the veyron shows its purpose. stupid "test"

  • Update: its 434 KM/H SS ultimate

  • everytime he changes gear, it sounds like sumthin blew up

  • you got venom in your brain

  • The Koenigsegg agera R just shaved 3 seconds off this time.

  • or viper venom vs bugatti venom

    or veyron vs venom (bugatti)

    or both vs R1K GTR lol

  • I wanna get a copy of that magazine!

  • Yawn.......

    

  • i just clicked this video so i can say : i dont care

  • New top speed of Bugatti is 260MPH beat that viper!!!!!!

  • @skodia koenigsegg agera 442kph {276mph}

  • @OHNGAI you serious??? i didnt know, thats somethin new, is there a video that it shows its top speed run?

  • @skodia top gear mag reported it,as of yet i have not been able to track any 'offical' vid it was the agera r ...the fastest buggati is the super sport 438 kph--273mph that is here on you-tube with captain slow [ james may ] driving it....the shelby aero tt 267 mph...

  • @OHNGAI its only 3 miles diff...lol

  • @skodia thats true , take a look at the veyron and the nissan r35 gtr around top gear test track,1200hp vs 520hp...only 1sec dif in favour of the veyron,the gtr has a boot and can fit 4 people in it. lol....check the nurburging nordschleife lap records they show the cars true speed with corners and handling not just straight line....

  • @OHNGAI

    the most recent pagani zonda is the actual number one of the cars buyable, cause the ferrari fx doesn't really count.

  • @mazdaplz if dreams were free ,it would be a zonda-r...but as far as value for money the GTR wins hands down,only wish is it would sound like the zonda-r...lol

  • @OHNGAI Well yeah true that...but if you are filthy rich and you like speed Veyron is the car....but if someone will give me 1.5mil to buy a bughatti ill rather pick a GTR and a Huge House you kno.

  • @skodia too true there aint no way i would waste 1.5 mil on a veyron.....ha ha i would on a zonda-r ....dam dreams are exspensive thesedays ha ha

  • @OHNGAI The GTR was built for the track, the Veyron was built to be a GT car with the highest top speed in the world, nothing else.

  • @iPROFITDON the GTR was not built for the track rather it was built for the 'ultimate' driving experience!...the veyron well overpriced ,overweight...dam fast but in reality useless!

  • @OHNGAI ...on the rack. It's noticeable in the transmissions as it gets confused while putting around town. It was designed , tuned, and developed at the track. The Veyron is not overpriced when you look at what you're getting. Ultimate luxury, speed, power, reliability. There isn't another car like it. Though it is useless as hell, just like all hyper cars.

  • @iPROFITDON its noticable in the transmision as it gets confused while putting around town?...do you own one? i dont think so!...ive been a fan of GTR's since before you were born,presuming 20yrs is your true age.

  • @OHNGAI I'm glad you've been a fan of GTRs way back. I only dig the R33 to current though. Of course I don't own one, I don't have that kind of money. But I have gotten lucky enough to drive one around town. 

  • The veyron is the fastest car alive.It could go 0-100 in 6.4 second's, so just double that and it's 12.8 second's.They tested this in top gear where the veyron raced against a jet.It was a awsome race

  • @Prototype6477 no it isn't....hate to break it to you.....theres plenty of better and faster/quicker cars

  • @Prototype6477 ".It could go 0-100 in 6.4 second's, so just double that and it's 12.8 second's." Thanks for making me laugh! Let me guess, you didn't pass your physics class or maybe you haven't tken one yet?

  • @Prototype6477 lol i guess your right :P

  • 220 and still going strong haha

  • the comparison is completely screwd up against the veyron coz they did not use topspeed mode. In topspeed mode, 0-200mph comes in 19.7s, obliterating the venom.

  • This test can't be accurate. The Bugatti would beat a Venom, even with similar HP/Torque. Like the other guys said, leave the testing to the professionals.

  • @THEeveryLASTinitial only thing slowing the venom is the transmission, put in the 7 speed and watch it run

  • @MrTrollus I'm still skeptical. It goes way beyond just raw power. Things from weight to aerodynamics. Plus, we can't forget human error in timing or gear switch accuracy. Like i said, leave it to the pros in a controlled enviroment.

  • @THEeveryLASTinitial Veyron weighs 500 kg more than the Viper, .39 coefficient vs .36 for veyron, AWD is the only reason the veyron would have a chance

  • srry man, leave it to the pros to do the tests cuz the veyron is officially better in speed and 0-200 test

  • The Bugatti is so refined and massage seats, completely loaded, finest leather and interiors. It's a corporate jet for the highway

  • Comment removed

  • So with that done,the vipers far more sexier too.

  • Bugatti's have 16 cylinders twin V-8 4 Turbo's and 10 Radiators to keep them Running COOL 1,000 hp in the Veyron's and it will kick a ford g-t's ass on the top end But there's the Gumphert and the Zonder and the Koenigsegg but the veyron handles like a dream at 260mph the others don't watch the two shows on hulu the fastest cars with paul tracy n tanner faust they test then all

  • why not measure 0-260m/h and let the Veyron kick the Venoms butt ?

  • since venom is tuned and veyron isnt

    it should be tuned venom and veyron ss

  • lets see the new venom against the old, or the venom against the Veyron SS

  • amazing

  • ya, but yall have to remember, one cost over 1.2 mil, and the other cost under 200k.

  • beat that no VENOM for the road lol but we have the Veyron Supersport, the veyron NO IS NOT ugly, the plan was 400kmh, over 1000bhp, NOT in a fan car

  • realistically who the fuck would take the venom?

  • @kyriswat911 me...

  • haha but i bet the bugatti driver wasnt bouncin around or havin to correct the steering the whole way down haha. i normally hate the veyron but compared to a rediculously modded viper. sorry ill take the veyron, however if u swap that veyron for a koeniggseg its another story anything from a ccx to agera r

  • G's <3 

  • Geil Geil Geil. Und man beachte das der Tacho Meilen anzeigt

  • The Viper takes off at 10 seconds and gets to 220 mph at 36 seconds, that's 26 seconds total. How do they say 20 seconds????

  • @myself...haha im an idiot thought you meant the Bughatti Venom that is suppost to come out, not the Venom Dodge Viper.. my bad

  • ugh thats a Viper bro.. lol

    

  • I wonder which is easier to control

  • Cool video but not sure how this is a comparison. The Bugatti is a daily driver. The viper clearly is not in this case.

    Impressive though.

  • Remember how awesome the F50 was when that came out?? Providing this fuel problem is sorted...imagine the crazy shit in 30 years!! 30k saloon cars doing 0-60 in 2 seconds :)

  • TRY STEER A CORNER WITH THAT VIPER AND U LL SEE THE VEYRON DRIVER SAYING GOODBYE TO U AND THE FIELD U ARE IN...

  • @000danis000 or not...remember that the veyron only has speed...

  • @deadfull17

    no man..veyron is the most perfectly mechanic-electronic combination ever used in a car...it has the best differentials the best 4wd system the best aerodynamic characteristics and all that...thats why it is the king of cars...there are faster cars or more brutal cars or even cars that beat it in 1/4 mile drag but nothing to mix speed luxury casual 4wd and horsepower...its just so simple...a car that has the overall best of all cars...

  • now get the supersports and let;s have another run !

  • americuh hell yeah

  • I will stick to my muscle, sports and Ferrari cars thank you very .

  • Its faster but it will also kill you faster :D.

  • I love how the Venom did 0-200 in 20.3 seconds, and about 15.8 seconds of that was spent launching/shifting gears, it's only the other 4.5 seconds that it was actually accelerating.

    But really, given the slow launch and lengthy shifts, that just makes its time all the more impressive

  • if i had 2 million dollars i would buy a damn brewery and turn this planet into alcoholics....

  • @MrManuvarela - Will there be hookers?

  • @xIntoThePitx of course!!!! paris hilton will be there and kim kardashan and going to be there!!!lol

  • @MrManuvarela - Sweet, hope there's beer!

  • This guy takes forever to shift

  • @HamNJelly He has to make sure he doesn't lose traction.

  • Yeah, 2mil is obscene. I would have to be Scrooge McDuck filthy to spend that kind of green on a car. And even then...is it really worth two McLaren F1?

  • @hectiky Scrooge McDuck filthy...lol. But a well looked after Mac F1 would easily set you back 2 mil...at least in the UK it would.

  • If you insist on calling the Veyron stock, then why don't you buy one and try to upgrade it! There will probably never be a non stock version of the veyron because it is already so expensive that it might as well be non stock already

  • Aren't Fiat500's, Honda Civic's and Ford Escorts for welfare folks? Funny how poor people always cry and hate on the successful guy. Funny how a poor retard made a video so full of lies. Funny how no other production car in the world can beat a 268 MPH Veyron. corvetteS and venomS that go over 170 mph are not production cars. Corvettes are junk. Fiats have more class.

  • @rawfoodgiveslife someone seems upset because theyre poor

  • nice fake video asshole

  • Comment removed

  • Hahaha look at all the butthurt people! $2,000,000 hahahaha what a joke! Who put more money in their car???

  • i am happy with my FIAT500

  • I'd take the veyron, sell it and buy 10 venoms.

  • I can't understand the point in this comparison is a stock road car vs a tuned non production car.

  • @iiredeye well you can't really tune a veyron... and the venom is tuned by a company. You can get much more horsepower out of the engine, but this is much more reasonable. The Veyron is just an attempt to prove that if you throw enough money into something it will go fast...

  • @iiredeye it is a production car cause you can buy it? oh wait you cant afford it, too bad, so sad. >=)-

  • @iiredeye production car my ass, I bet there are more venoms on the planet than veyrons by a large margin. They cost less and they are faster (practically) oh yeah and they dont scream pompus douche with way too much bloody money for his own good.

  • @CMI1986X64 Quite clearly you do not understand the definition of "production car" I can't really be bothered to explain it to you, other than to say it has nothing to do whatsoever with numbers.

  • @iiredeye So we will just start calling saleen S7's and Koenigsegg CCR-X production cars too than, oh and don't forget about the McLaren F1 back in its day. Just because you crank out 5 or 10 1.3 million dollar cars a year (for specific customer orders, not dealer stock) does not make it a production car.

  • @CMI1986X64 Ok I did'nt really want to get into all this but i've been provoked so here goes. The main dofference between a stock (production) car and a tuned car is, the manufacturer of the production car has to endure the massive costs associated with putting a production car on the road, i.e the development of the vehicle...chassis,engine,drive­train etc etc. As a ball park figure for a company to launch a new model into the showroom it would have invested at least $1 billion in development.

  • @iiredeye And look how much more they make per car. This conversation has nothing to do with money. This conversation has to do with the manufacturing of the Venom and Veyron and the level of performance yield as a result. They are both follow a hand built vehicle specific parts and tuning process that in the end yields a one off car.

    Encarta (Production Car) definition

    car manufactured on production line: a car of a type manufactured in large numbers on a production line for general use.

  • @CMI1986X64 In comparison a tuner has none of these associated costs, they take a stock car, tune it to what ever level they think they can market it too, and that is basically that. Please don't get me wrong i'm not hating anyones cars, but trust me on this there is a world of difference between the veyron and the Viper because it is a non standard tuned car.

  • @iiredeye I feel ya. I didn't think you were hating. My only argument is I don't really feel the Bugatti isn't a one off pre-tuned to the max machine. They are 100% hand-built with parts specific to that individual car. The reason you never really see a performance aftermarket for Bugatti's for the simple fact they have already gone through and tuned that specific car to make as much power as possible. Only difference is Bugatti did this in house, Venom did the same just somewhere else.

  • @iiredeye

    how much is the viper?

    how much is the bugatti?

    thats the point of the comparison

  • @wow1022 Take the Viper for a long trip around the states or europe or anywhere and see how long it takes for your bum to fall off and your ears to bleed. The Veyron isn't a Sports car, or a Supercar, it's a GT car (Grand Tourer) designed to be everything a car can be and more. Sure there are faster cars, cheaper cars, more luxurious, but none have it all. All these videos vs Veyron are stupid, it's a concorde car, there's nothing that you can compare it to

  • @iiredeye

    but they have very similar horsepower thats the reason

  • @LeFatalpotato thats the worst reason lmfao? If this car had all the safety features and could pass all requirements to qualify for street legalism, the veyron would beat it

  • @stanglmeier

    it has already passed the requirements its a road legal car

  • @iiredeye The point is why spend 1 million on a Veyron when you can smoke it with a Ford GT TT for 1/4 the cost.

  • @greendayrules11 Your comment only goes to prove you have never actually been anywhere near a Bugatti.

  • @iiredeye Bugatti has 4 turbos on a w-16, this is a v-10 with two turbos. Give credit where its due.

  • @SoldierOfTheSea This owner tuned, non production, one off Viper is fast, however I have been to race meets and seen much faster owner tuned, non production, one offs (other cars)...so it's difficult for me to join in with the hero worship. I have, however never in my life before seen a PRODUCTION CAR go as quickly as a Bugatti Veyron...so this car does excite me...a bit.

  • @SoldierOfTheSea And 1001hp

  • @iiredeye obviously the fact whether if either car is stock, tuned or non production is irrelevant. Its simply a test of which is faster.

  • @rashmi3415 Oh ok in which case why don't they just include the thrust SSC.

  • @iiredeye if they had access to it, i dont see why they can't. 

  • @rashmi3415 because it's like comparing apples with oranges...why would you?

  • @iiredeye LOL so are you suggesting i should compare an apple with an...apple? You could compare a veryron with the venom, nissan micra, a mc laren f1 or the SSC thrust. Each comparison will give a different set of data but none if it will be the same since you used different cars, and thus for each comparison you will gain a unique insight, no matter how obvious or pointless the result was. In the end it is more useful to compare the apple with the orange, instead of another apple.

  • @rashmi3415 For goodness sake is it only me that can actually see this for what it is?

    Ok fine compare a Veyron to a Nissan Micra if you want...as long as they are both production, standard, untuned cars, that are built and sold by the manufacturers, not one off tuned specials.

    If you want to test said one off tuned special, test it against another tuned one off special.

    Like I said apples vs apples...oranges vs oranges.

  • @iiredeye i completely understood what you meant. but the point I am trying to make there MANY DIFFERENT types of comparisons and in each you would be measuring and restricting different variables. This is a comparison of ONLY PERFORMANCE between 2 1000hp cars. Just because one is tuned and the other is stock doesnt mean this comparison is invalid. If i were working for either hennessey or bugatti i would find this comparison more useful, simply because a micra doesnt reach 200mph.

  • @rashmi3415 I understand that you think the comparison between a highly tuned non standard car, and a stock Veyron may be in someway relevant, I however completely disagree. The test conducted by road and track (titled 0-200MPH shootout) is in some way insinuating that this car can in some way be held in the same regard as the Veyron. It cannot, the Veyron is the ultimate performance car ever built,(although it's a long way from being my favourite) I think we will just have to agree to disagree.

  • @iiredeye a title can insinuate a lot of things, buts thats all subjective to the reader. I am looking at this at the most scientific and objective perspective possible; a comparison between 1000hp two cars. The comparison's validity is in no way affected by what the video may insinuate or imply. Of course this video could be made to promote hennessey, but if an objective stance is taken this anyone's view on the veyron should remain the same.

  • @iiredeye I might be a tad pedantic here, but we could come to at least one agreement i believe, that is only if you change claim to the veyron being the ultimate SUPERCAR ever built. I have never been in one, but i have a feeling that the veyron is a tad too comfortable to be a performance car :P.

  • sweet

  • Did anybody else see a chevy or a ford on the cover of the magazine in the begining. Wonder why???

  • @619426 ya the vette

    

  • @danf411990 my bad, didn't see or read that it said corvette.

  • @619426 It was the battle of the supercars. The chevy zr1 was the chevy... I don't remember what the ford was, I havent read the issue in a few years...

  • Ya want a cookie?I mean cmon the viper is way lighter duh

  • The front is orginal fender weres that sick front bumper it makes it look like it's scooping up the road