Added: 4 years ago
From: truebluestar
Views: 14,810
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it should of took those towers at least 20 seconds to fall not 10 secs.

  • And that's not freefall speed.

  • The wtc fell faster than that though.

  • PBS refuses to air the original broadcast of the videos in which the video taker follow a catholic preist who was with some fire crew members and I remember they tried to reair the video but it was so highly edited that none of the emotion or tension of that day was in the video but clearly edit almost as if to remove any possible sounds that could be used in a future court of law.

  • How much did one of those floor assemblies weigh? There were 84 of them in each tower.

    So how is it that after almost NINE YEARS we never see the total weight of a floor assembly? How have the people who claim to know physics not demanded that information by now? We are supposed to do physics without data?

    .

  • one question regarding demolition, as i understand planned demolitions arnt like inthe movis, the ake a fair bit of work in pre weakening structures prior to that

  • it was obvious to me when originally watching this on broadcast that finite element analysis was not an element of the finite analysis of the anal v.o. -- additionally, the v.o. seems to have been in part trained by the hypno-trance of which the compleat takeover of free-world-order by oblivion-world-order has been ordered by the Citrine Mountain ddnp crew.

  • Google Arron Russo. Enough said.

  • Make no mistake. This calls for a revolution. These bastards are not going to step aside. Trouble is, most Americans are against each other, rather than the government. In France, 10 million people shut the government down in '68. Americans will end up in concentration camps before they get the idea.

  • the central supports are visible still standing, (but wobbling back and forth) in some videos of the tower collapse

  • google: Quadri-Track ZCT

  • did no one here take physics? A mass of steel and concrete accelerating is not going to slow down when it hits steel with a low shearing tension

  • Why would you say the WTCs had a low shearing tension? Where did you get that information? So by your logic, We should have started with a slow collapse and then just continued to gain momentum at what? 9.8 m/s ^ 2? Why? If the collapse was so slow to begin with, which it would have been if it was natural, why was there no increase in speed? Why does every bolt on every floor, at every connection to each core column shear at the same time, all the way down. No resistance at all? That's physics?

  • Bush made millions off from Persian gulf Oil.

    Bush is working for Sauda Arabia not for Americans.

    Bush Administration (Bull Shitt Rapeministration) Liars, manipulators, helped in economic oppression of the American middle and low class. How hard is it to get a loan, give a real reasonable open reason why?, and not one with mirrors, an shadows.

  • towers fell at free fall speed buddy,, pankake theory doesnt explain that ..u r the tool, ur a tool to the government cuz u work ur whole life giving 1/4 of ur money to them sick bastards, they spent 10 trillion dollars on fuckin pointless war....now wut do u think were doing in iraq?... um ..helping citizens??? NO.....u.s is building permanent military bases in other countries so they get free oil, nd control the population u faggot, ignoramous

  • I agree with most of your comment, except for the part that this is about oil. Obtaining oil can be done through different means. And if we want to follow the typical capitalist approach to things: Once they become to expensive it becomes less efficient, so we will move onto another energy source. I think this is more about culture. It is the one culture that truly stands in the way of a world government and the only one, currently, that poses a true threat to a one world economy. In my opinion.

  • those damn scientists and their calculations always messing up those commonsense conspiracy theories about the tower collapse! Of course it couldnt freefall, the WTC had spirit of strong dragon and resist standard 9.8m/s^2 accleration of gravity. you fucking tools. millions of tons falling is not going to pause to shear steel bolts, its just shear them like butter and keep on falling. where do you suggest it wouldve slowed down and taken a coffee break?

  • vblogrsRLZrs, its actually not normal behaviour for an object to be crushed to dust in just over free fall speed if a quarter of its weight is dropped on it. from your logic if a car fell on a bus suspended vertically from a few meteres above it would crush it to the ground at free fall speed?

    why you would expect this outcome with modern skyscrapers constructed by top engineers and architects is beyond me

  • You seem to think that the collapse started at the outside and that the core columns were in tact and holding their loads against the downward force of everything else. In that case, shear physics would be necessary. But the collapse started in the core, thus negating anything you just said. The collapse did not happen like Nova shows above. You can observe it in 1WTC, 2WTC and 7WTC. The cores went first, removing the load resistance to gravity. There was no reason for it to slow.

  • bweazel, right.some vids shows the core shortly.but why does such a massive core turns suddenly into dust and pieces that where just as big to load them on a truck ? thats what happen on a controlled demolition.if it was a pancake collaps the pieces of the core would be bigger than that what we saw.

  • i love propaganda,wars, buildings blown up, dropping bombs, making people shit scared of WMD's - its so cool!! make bush king the fucking hitler bastard!!

  • Why are you trying to sound like the Nova announcer? Trying to fool people into thinking your stupid conjectures were part of the Nova broadcast! I have never seen anything from the Truthers that explains how the so called insiders set up / wired the towers with explosives (with no one seeing it). How does their theory make it fall faster, what are detonation location and sequence etc.

  • Note that they don't speak of the WTC hit by the very small plane on a small corner. This building fell right after the first one. It sustained minimal damage.

  • Nova isnt "in on it" - couldnt it be similar to "square earth" philosophy or "Piltdown Man"?

    Think, then react, not react, then think.

  • You dummies need to realize that no one wants to believe our government was involved in a mass murder. This resistance is the motivation to cover up the facts and mislead the public. Nova is not "in on it". Howver, it is much easier to support the official story rather than question it. It's easier to turn a blind eye to the truth like many of you are doing, but does not do justice.

  • Simple Science folks. Strength of materials, heat temp induced, time of exposer. All scenarios. 911 WTC buildings could not have failed from aluminum air strikes alone. Nor would a plane create a perfect impact hole, like the flight 93 lie we've been fed. Wings & Veftical stabilizors don't phisically follow the fusalage. Wings,Virtical Stab,GC In Decovorring

  • drop a bowling ball 1700 feet and time it. Let me know what you come up with.

  • who cares if it was a bomb?what does it matter?the people are dead and proving that they were killed by a bomb will not bring them back

  • If we use that reasoning, the we should fire all the homicide detectives everywhere... after all, investigating homicides and bringing murderers to justice, doesn't bring the vitims back, does it?

  • We are at war with people that had not one thing to do with 9/11 that's way it matters!3,000 people died for a lie that is way it matters ass hole!!

  • Well Nova's credabilty is shot. Who'll be next to sacrafice themselves for Lord Bush.

  • The reason that they are a "respected" TV show is because you (truebluestar) dont work there, thank god, because if you did, then they wouldnt be 'respected'. The Nova broadcast was correct in its original form without his retarded voiceover claiming things in science which are really not at all scientific.

  • his voice annoyed the shit out fo me. o.o

  • Energy travels faster in steel than in air. Therefore a reinforcement acts like energy bridge, sending the overload faster to the level below. In the video the reinforcements are removed to make the collapse faster. It's really the other way around. Energy travels faster in hard material.

  • Reminds me of when I was talking to one my friends about what the speed of sound was. He didn't believe me when said that sound travels faster through a solid than the air.

  • The floor plans of the WTC were not even released until 2004 after a law suite. What is the government hiding.

  • you should be more concerned with what they are doing now than what they did then... they are attempting to start a cascade war with islam. This is what you should be questioning.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more