Every one is a "photographer" today! Equipment is not the most important factor. Great images come from any camera. I do mean ANY camera. In the old days cameras were primitive but photographers produced fantastic images. Today, we have incredible technology and a boatload of morons claiming to be "photographers" I know many old art directors (70 years old plus) who are 100 times more creative than todays young copy-cat gutless wonder insipid unoriginal equipment worshiping dolts. AMEN.
Best internet comment of the day I think. That is absolutely spot on, I've seen some people do great things with a simple P & S camera (like me for example, or at least I like to think so, hehe - have some sample photos in my own Youtube Channel, though!) but I've come across some pretty lousy shots taken on high-end DSLR's by people who has more money than sense.
Yeah it is a mix of 2 different formats and it was desaturated but it is an early TEST shoot (mostly natural light) with the 5d.. maybe READ the description before blindly being such a hater douche.. oh wait! you're probably a photographer and want to say that YOUR stuff looks so much better. RIIIIiiiight.
you're arguing about quality over a youtube video? even thou this wasn't deinterlaced and IS ON YOUTUBE, quality is fine (yes, fine, even on the hd version - we all know youtube compression fcks up the video).
@sarahmarshallkillahs Well I did, but it still lacks quality I see interlacing wich is not good and I'm not the only one who sees this. Sorry, but even the HD button ( wich I clicked in the first place did not improve a lot. I do think though that having seen some of your other stuff that you can do much better!
@glennwass I did and I also have a HD screen and a 5d MKII as well as a 1D MK IV, either the editing went wrong or something else, sorry I still think it lacks the quality of a MKII. Hazy and poor lighting and yes I'm an expert. i've been shooting movies and docu's with Arri's and digital XD's so I know what I'm talking about. Make a new edit and maybe, just maybe it'll improve. Sorry I don't wanna insult you, but this can be so much better. Good luck next time.
Okay, you are right. I was not watching in 720"HD". But, two other things I will share with you: If a video is natively intended to be displayed at HD then that is usually the way Youtube has been displaying them by DEFAULT. Other videos here that are of your same HD quality in my browser will first display at the intended resolution. Yours begins in 360p and shows no sign of HD as an option. You might want to take a look and edit that setting for this upload.
@sarahmarshallkillahs you seem to have shot this in INTERLACED video. But Youtube is generally shown in Progressive because that is the way a computer monitor sees things. So, a video shot with an interlaced scan will show jaggies when things are in motion. If the subject is standing still everything is fine, but the moment they move or the camera moves the motion jaggies show up. It would look better HERE if you ran a de-interlace first on the footage. Nice cam though!
she has cute sexy calves. I really like the contrast that video has on this camera, with the high quality lenses. If I wind up getting a mk 2 I may find myself using it instead of my SR11.
How's your video noise in shady areas? I get quite a bit..and I use the 2.0.4 firmware, shoot with ISO around 100, but doubt it stays there...no sharpening anymore...I stop down in av mode...but get a lot of video noise in those areas above black...looks tacky...
Czesc, Dominika. The footage in the red/pink dress: what made it so desaturated? Did you overexpose? It looks so washed out, compared to the stuff under the pier. Thanks for posting!
The footage shot in the red dress was shot with a mini 35 rig (and they didn't get a chance to color correct) but I liked it (the mood of it) so it's 2 diff cameras
are you anti campaigning against the canon 5d? everything about this video sucks.
12pieter34 1 month ago
the surfer in the back grough was a cool effect.
lifethroughmylens1 2 months ago
interlaced video mark II ???
waterley12 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Poor edition, bad photography and the most important thing horrible song.
xvid27 3 months ago
Bad song, bad footage no nip action. Give me the camera you suck.
MrMiket79 4 months ago
She looks sooo much prettier than any waves in this video!
ronaldl911 4 months ago
And surfing ?
AlexLemonnier 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At 0:46 she freaks out, cause she thinks the camera guy is about to touch her ass LOL
Montevail666 4 months ago
Comment removed
Montevail666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my channel?
TheCouchiBoys 4 months ago
I guess I'm not the only person that's seen several of these bids on youtube and not at all impressed with the camera.
TheTopBloke 5 months ago
where the fug is 480p?
VinnePS3Gaming 5 months ago
get a white balance or lightbox
d3ZoRGG 5 months ago
I think shot by a photograper not taking in mind the 1/3 laws of video. That is why the video feels amateur even though shot with a great camera
computerjantje 6 months ago
a 5d mark 2 doesnt make good pictures itself -.-
Kentiapalme 7 months ago
Every one is a "photographer" today! Equipment is not the most important factor. Great images come from any camera. I do mean ANY camera. In the old days cameras were primitive but photographers produced fantastic images. Today, we have incredible technology and a boatload of morons claiming to be "photographers" I know many old art directors (70 years old plus) who are 100 times more creative than todays young copy-cat gutless wonder insipid unoriginal equipment worshiping dolts. AMEN.
lachasse 7 months ago 6
@lachasse
Best internet comment of the day I think. That is absolutely spot on, I've seen some people do great things with a simple P & S camera (like me for example, or at least I like to think so, hehe - have some sample photos in my own Youtube Channel, though!) but I've come across some pretty lousy shots taken on high-end DSLR's by people who has more money than sense.
idj20 6 months ago
poor cinematography imho
songsmadeforyou 7 months ago 2
hermosa beach
1khalil9 7 months ago
two prostitutes !
these are definitely not models..
geishathor 7 months ago
Great video...
renebruunphoto 8 months ago
ни капли гламура ))
belynochka 9 months ago
Yeah it is a mix of 2 different formats and it was desaturated but it is an early TEST shoot (mostly natural light) with the 5d.. maybe READ the description before blindly being such a hater douche.. oh wait! you're probably a photographer and want to say that YOUR stuff looks so much better. RIIIIiiiight.
helenagirl 10 months ago
patetic!!!
artiehoyos 10 months ago
she wiping her boogers @ 0:34
fullwithlove 11 months ago
That is the most beautiful lady I have seen in along time.
She is From Another Planet
HeavyMagic01 1 year ago
The model had a great spirit. Good location. Checkout my tutorial on 5D filmmaking. Cheers.
DemiTheCameraMan 1 year ago
looks likes shes crapping at 0:25 :)
milkalbaras 1 year ago 12
No freak'n light on the model... Chit, it's all muddy.
pfiltz 1 year ago
very beautiful women nice outfits
narcovice 1 year ago
half of the shots are flat and the other half have too much contrast, they dont match at all
lovekyordie15 1 year ago
i should think about this girl more often
membland 1 year ago
you're arguing about quality over a youtube video? even thou this wasn't deinterlaced and IS ON YOUTUBE, quality is fine (yes, fine, even on the hd version - we all know youtube compression fcks up the video).
tchago 1 year ago
Comment removed
glennwass 1 year ago
Comment removed
glennwass 1 year ago
@glennwass and you're a resident expert becaus_______? That HD button, try clicking on it.
sarahmarshallkillahs 1 year ago
Comment removed
glennwass 1 year ago
@sarahmarshallkillahs Well I did, but it still lacks quality I see interlacing wich is not good and I'm not the only one who sees this. Sorry, but even the HD button ( wich I clicked in the first place did not improve a lot. I do think though that having seen some of your other stuff that you can do much better!
glennwass 1 year ago
Comment removed
glennwass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glennwass I did and I also have a HD screen and a 5d MKII as well as a 1D MK IV, either the editing went wrong or something else, sorry I still think it lacks the quality of a MKII. Hazy and poor lighting and yes I'm an expert. i've been shooting movies and docu's with Arri's and digital XD's so I know what I'm talking about. Make a new edit and maybe, just maybe it'll improve. Sorry I don't wanna insult you, but this can be so much better. Good luck next time.
glennwass 1 year ago
the quality sucks...this can't be the 5d mark ii
siliconsurf 1 year ago 49
@siliconsurf he didn't play too much with the depth of field..he probably had his f-stop closed up while using the kit lense...still looks decent...
BlackSupraC2 1 year ago
@siliconsurf The quality sucks??? Yeah ehh. hmmm... i don't know if you're able to find the HD Button to turn the quality from "360p" to "720p".
MrMovieTom 1 year ago
@MrMovieTom doesn't matter, this composition sucks...lousy lighting.
siliconsurf 1 year ago
@MrMovieTom nope. it still sucks cock at 720p
siliconsurf 10 months ago 2
@siliconsurf The video format sucks not the camera ...
termo16 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@siliconsurf The video format sucks not the camera ...
termo16 10 months ago
@siliconsurf no this is definitely the 5D, it's just bad photography
smileandwave1987 9 months ago 5
@siliconsurf maybe the PHOTOGRAPHER have a 5D mark II??!
Limezik 3 months ago
@siliconsurf Well, yes, it is. It's about 3000 backs and quality as you can see not the best.
SergSpace 1 month ago
Okay, you are right. I was not watching in 720"HD". But, two other things I will share with you: If a video is natively intended to be displayed at HD then that is usually the way Youtube has been displaying them by DEFAULT. Other videos here that are of your same HD quality in my browser will first display at the intended resolution. Yours begins in 360p and shows no sign of HD as an option. You might want to take a look and edit that setting for this upload.
ViennaForever 1 year ago
@ViennaForever @ViennaForever the HD version looks fine??? is your connection finnicky?
sarahmarshallkillahs 1 year ago
@sarahmarshallkillahs you seem to have shot this in INTERLACED video. But Youtube is generally shown in Progressive because that is the way a computer monitor sees things. So, a video shot with an interlaced scan will show jaggies when things are in motion. If the subject is standing still everything is fine, but the moment they move or the camera moves the motion jaggies show up. It would look better HERE if you ran a de-interlace first on the footage. Nice cam though!
ViennaForever 1 year ago
@ViennaForever the HD version looks fine???
sarahmarshallkillahs 1 year ago
she has cute sexy calves. I really like the contrast that video has on this camera, with the high quality lenses. If I wind up getting a mk 2 I may find myself using it instead of my SR11.
pulmonq2 1 year ago
How's your video noise in shady areas? I get quite a bit..and I use the 2.0.4 firmware, shoot with ISO around 100, but doubt it stays there...no sharpening anymore...I stop down in av mode...but get a lot of video noise in those areas above black...looks tacky...
sclogse1 1 year ago
This man, the singer, is very tall and very good locking, and, of corse, a remarkable good musician.
He is from Halmstad in Sweden,
I think he is owner of a portable computer.
cila65 1 year ago
Duhh, I just realised that the MODEL is Polish, not you, Sarah. Sorry. (Cough).
MrFrinkham 2 years ago
Czesc, Dominika. The footage in the red/pink dress: what made it so desaturated? Did you overexpose? It looks so washed out, compared to the stuff under the pier. Thanks for posting!
MrFrinkham 2 years ago
@MrFrinkham
hi ya MrFrinkham
The footage shot in the red dress was shot with a mini 35 rig (and they didn't get a chance to color correct) but I liked it (the mood of it) so it's 2 diff cameras
sarahmarshallkillahs 2 years ago
@sarahmarshallkillahs
Ah! Now I understand. Thanks for that. Yeah, with a colour grade it'd have that missing ingredient put back in. Gorgeous model too. Viva Polska!
MrFrinkham 2 years ago
she wants a winkie in her.
sodiumwinter 2 years ago 3
normalnaya blyad
xpenbambcem 2 years ago