Science doesn't work with consensus. Hitler once published a book named called a "Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein". When Einstein was confronted with this, he simply stated: "It doesn’t take 100 scientists to prove me wrong, it takes a single fact". You can't line up a bunch of scientists to say one thing and expect it to be a scientific fact. It takes just one scientist, writing one scientific paper. It's one thing to recognize fear-mongering, it's another to say it doesn't happen at all.
Theoretical vaccines never harm anyone, only contaminated ones do harm, and once done can never be undone. Contaminants include: SV40, hCG, MSG, Pestivirus, Viral fragments, Thimerosal (mercury), and there is no way of knowing what other contaminants can and will be introduced.
PS. This video has a Darwinist refuting a Homeopath. Darwin was educated in Geology NOT Biology and he failed at both. Darwin is mostly popular with Eugenicists. See: Expelled no intelligence allowed
Don't forget that Scheibner is a simple liar, too. She claims that after Japan postponed childhood vaccinations there were no more cases of SIDS in Japan when the truth is that SIDS peaked in Japan after that point, onlx there were no more compensations paid out of the vaccine compensation fund (they have very gererous rules in Japan) for SIDS after that point.
I don't see DR. in front of your name! Go ahead and load yourself up with toxins and if you feel ok , you may have some time left to really EDUCATE yourself!!
@1jtbt1 lol is this a joke? I hope you realize the sheer hypocrisy in that statement. Because I'm not a Dr, I'm less credible... yet the vast majority of Doctors approve of vaccination, and they aren't credible?
Either being a Dr. matters to you or it doesn't. Clearly you just pick and choose when you care.
Last year the Cochraine Collaboration, a very big medical database group in the UK, did a 96 season study on the flu vaccination and concluded that it was basically ineffective. The latest EBM for flu jab efficacy is virtually non existent. People who believe the story of Jenner and the Milkmaids/cowpox small pox may be surprised to know that genetics shows no relationship whatsoever between these diseases.
Vaccination is an archaic medieval voodoo procedure, but that’s religion!
While Presley's main physician, Dr. Nichopoulos, was exonerated of criminal liability for the singer's death, the facts were startling: "In the first eight months of 1977 alone, he had [prescribed] more than 10,000 doses of sedatives, amphetamines and narcotics: all in Elvis's name." His license was suspended for three months. It was permanently revoked in the 1990s after the Tennessee Medical Board brought new charges of over-prescription.
A surgeon who admitted killing a patient during an operation walked free from the Old Bailey yesterday after a judge gave him a suspended prison sentence.
Steven Walker, 47, admitted the manslaughter of Dorothy McPhee. The 71-year-old patient bled to death during a liver operation at Blackpool Victoria Hospital in 1995.
@deRoyLight Be fair, it is 'medical scientists' who are so good at corporate lying and being on commitees that tell us we are all going to die whilst their mates take public money to inject us with crap.
Lucky he admitted it. Medicine is the number one recorded cause of death in the USA and there the infant mortality is worse than Costa Rica and Jamaica due to the overmedicalisation, especially the compulsory vaccine programme. If vaccine compliance in the USA is compulsory and they claim almost 100% coverage how come the kids are so damn sick?
Type 'GP strike and death' into the web and you will see when doctors go on strike the death rate falls by up to 35%
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Fine guys, do not eat apples or any kind of food for all I care. It is all bad for you. Keep drinking the cool aid of drugs from big Rx. It is all 100% truth as you say and it will keep you strong & healthy.
I will try to not overdose on my apples or the lethal vitamin C.
That was a really poor analogy I'm sorry to say, and your last statement is really just an evasion to provide any sort of evidential support to your claim.
I want you to research anecdotes, and why they aren't reliable.
Do not believe all the stuff you read in the so called "academic journals" they speak half truth or no truth at all. They are all sponsored by Big Rx. I used to believe all that stuff.
I did see with my own eyes the son of a friend of mine become autistic after vaccination. Big Rx will always claim that there is no link between vaccines & autism.
Whatever your belief or opinion is in this matter, I will always respect it.
People make money off of things that work all the time. That's the entire basis to a capitalistic society. So that someone is making a profit is of no consequence.
I'm sorry to hear about your friend's son, but you're speaking irrationally. That event B happens after event A doesn't mean B is caused by A. This is basic logic.
A few minor tweaks, and yes a "better" mic (they didn't have what I wanted, and I caved in and got something super cheap). Still not very good, but sounds a lot better than the last one.
how dare you critique good people who only want to provide alternatives to modern medicine lol, just kidding. great video man, i love when these quacks get busted for their sketchy agendas built on b.s. and fantasy.
do you read the science based medicine blog? it's awesome.
Can one of you show me just ''one'' empirical long term study that show me that it's perfectly safe to allow this vaccine to be injected into my child's body?
Can you prove to me that all these mommies who lost their little babies only hours and days after being vaccinated did not loose them because of the vaccination?
Which "valid'' empirical studies says that injecting Squalene, Thimerosal, and Mercury into a human body is safe?
How would you feel if it were your baby that you lost?
First, you're asking to prove that something doesn't do something. That's like asking me to prove I can't fly. No amount of not flying is going to convince you, or prove to you that I can't fly.
The correct question to ask is: Is there any empirical data to suggest X is the result of Y? This onus of proof is then on you to support your assertions.
Mercury, squalene and the likes fit into something called threshold of toxicity. It's the basic principle behind toxicology. Toxicity is entirely relative. Everything is toxic once it passes the threshold of toxicity for the host. However, just like water can lead to water intoxication, what is dangerous in excess can actually be neutral, or even beneficial at certain proportions.
Things like thimerosol are actually beneficial, in that they kill bacteria to prevent infection.... continued.
With this knowledge at hand, what you need to do is quite simple: Demonstrate that the dose of mercury found in thimerosol is enough to cause harm. Because as it stands, every scientific study has continued to publish results finding that the amount of mercury present in thimerosol is not enough to be harmful. So it would be your job now to find out why every credible study in the last decade has continued to conclude that the dose is not dangerous.
Think about what you're saying for a second. If the cure for cancer is known, then there must have been scientific studies done to support this. If there are no scientific studies, then you can't make a statement like "the cure for cancer is known." Saying that studies are hidden is just a negative argument. Produce these scientific studies that provide a cure for cancer. If you can't do this, then you have no grounds to say this in the first place.
When you are explaining something to people who don't know much about the subject matter, you have to explain what a pig is as though you were explaining it to an alien.
and if you are in the scientific community, you should know that pharmaceutical companies often are the ones paying for these studies and anything natural is a aggressively disapproved and or hidden.
I can't speak for your personal experience. There are certainly people without ulterior motives that reject vaccines (hence why there are numerous reasons for objection listed at the beginning of the video).
I'd also need you to recommend to me what video it is that you are talking about, so that I can know where you're coming from.
Spartan9688m, it is pretty much the contrary. Vaccination studies show the dangers, it is no secret, except for those who have not done their research.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
um . .. the most important people speaking about vaccines are not here? and they are not natural medicine people though I do wonder why one would be against natural ways to heal ones self. I think that we can trust them more then those who love to stick chemicals in our bodies.
That is a logical fallacy called appeal to nature. Natural substances can be harmful, and aren't necessarily better at healing or curing disease than medicine that is made artificially. What you need is empirical evidence, which is what the anti-vaxxers don't have. All they have are anecdotes and assertions.
Science doesn't work with consensus. Hitler once published a book named called a "Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein". When Einstein was confronted with this, he simply stated: "It doesn’t take 100 scientists to prove me wrong, it takes a single fact". You can't line up a bunch of scientists to say one thing and expect it to be a scientific fact. It takes just one scientist, writing one scientific paper. It's one thing to recognize fear-mongering, it's another to say it doesn't happen at all.
NeonGen2000 1 month ago
Theoretical vaccines never harm anyone, only contaminated ones do harm, and once done can never be undone. Contaminants include: SV40, hCG, MSG, Pestivirus, Viral fragments, Thimerosal (mercury), and there is no way of knowing what other contaminants can and will be introduced.
PS. This video has a Darwinist refuting a Homeopath. Darwin was educated in Geology NOT Biology and he failed at both. Darwin is mostly popular with Eugenicists. See: Expelled no intelligence allowed
fsoiberg 11 months ago
@fsoiberg
> See: Expelled no intelligence allowed
You just lost the game. Not even Ben Stein would believe anything you said now.
rkyeun 3 months ago
Did you not die of Small Pox?
Thank a vaccine!
soulinite 1 year ago
Don't forget that Scheibner is a simple liar, too. She claims that after Japan postponed childhood vaccinations there were no more cases of SIDS in Japan when the truth is that SIDS peaked in Japan after that point, onlx there were no more compensations paid out of the vaccine compensation fund (they have very gererous rules in Japan) for SIDS after that point.
giliellthesecond 1 year ago
Gary Nulls death by Medicine will be in theaters 12/10, as in 750,000 deaths a year
he will be there to answer Q&A, not like this blabber zero
fmogiba 1 year ago 2
Quick, someone remind the anti-vax groups that Oxygen is toxic.
Vynjira 1 year ago 2
I don't see DR. in front of your name! Go ahead and load yourself up with toxins and if you feel ok , you may have some time left to really EDUCATE yourself!!
1jtbt1 1 year ago
@1jtbt1 lol is this a joke? I hope you realize the sheer hypocrisy in that statement. Because I'm not a Dr, I'm less credible... yet the vast majority of Doctors approve of vaccination, and they aren't credible?
Either being a Dr. matters to you or it doesn't. Clearly you just pick and choose when you care.
deRoyLight 1 year ago 10
@deRoyLight
Last year the Cochraine Collaboration, a very big medical database group in the UK, did a 96 season study on the flu vaccination and concluded that it was basically ineffective. The latest EBM for flu jab efficacy is virtually non existent. People who believe the story of Jenner and the Milkmaids/cowpox small pox may be surprised to know that genetics shows no relationship whatsoever between these diseases.
Vaccination is an archaic medieval voodoo procedure, but that’s religion!
swingvalse 1 year ago
While Presley's main physician, Dr. Nichopoulos, was exonerated of criminal liability for the singer's death, the facts were startling: "In the first eight months of 1977 alone, he had [prescribed] more than 10,000 doses of sedatives, amphetamines and narcotics: all in Elvis's name." His license was suspended for three months. It was permanently revoked in the 1990s after the Tennessee Medical Board brought new charges of over-prescription.
rawisin 1 year ago
A surgeon who admitted killing a patient during an operation walked free from the Old Bailey yesterday after a judge gave him a suspended prison sentence.
Steven Walker, 47, admitted the manslaughter of Dorothy McPhee. The 71-year-old patient bled to death during a liver operation at Blackpool Victoria Hospital in 1995.
dannymans888 1 year ago
@dannymans888 uh oh... cherry-picked anecdotal stories.
Watch out. We have a future scientist on our hands.
deRoyLight 1 year ago 2
@deRoyLight Be fair, it is 'medical scientists' who are so good at corporate lying and being on commitees that tell us we are all going to die whilst their mates take public money to inject us with crap.
swingvalse 1 year ago
@dannymans888
Lucky he admitted it. Medicine is the number one recorded cause of death in the USA and there the infant mortality is worse than Costa Rica and Jamaica due to the overmedicalisation, especially the compulsory vaccine programme. If vaccine compliance in the USA is compulsory and they claim almost 100% coverage how come the kids are so damn sick?
Type 'GP strike and death' into the web and you will see when doctors go on strike the death rate falls by up to 35%
swingvalse 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fine guys, do not eat apples or any kind of food for all I care. It is all bad for you. Keep drinking the cool aid of drugs from big Rx. It is all 100% truth as you say and it will keep you strong & healthy.
I will try to not overdose on my apples or the lethal vitamin C.
metalflyer11 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You said it my friend "out of things that work", but I do have a problem when someone tries to scam me out for profit.
You are saying that if I see a person kill someone with my own eyes, but I can not prove it, that person is innocent. WOW!!!!
Who is being irrational?
What I see here is that we both can be running in circles about this all day and never agree.
Good luck to you....
metalflyer11 2 years ago
That was a really poor analogy I'm sorry to say, and your last statement is really just an evasion to provide any sort of evidential support to your claim.
I want you to research anecdotes, and why they aren't reliable.
deRoyLight 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Vaccines are a scam for profit period.
They are dangerous.
All this so called scientific studies claimed from drug companies are a bunch of crap to satisfy their needs.
MONEY,MONEY,MONEY
metalflyer11 2 years ago
wooo
deRoyLight 2 years ago
Comment removed
2DGorillaz192000 2 years ago
That's OK I will keep eating my apples.
Do not believe all the stuff you read in the so called "academic journals" they speak half truth or no truth at all. They are all sponsored by Big Rx. I used to believe all that stuff.
I did see with my own eyes the son of a friend of mine become autistic after vaccination. Big Rx will always claim that there is no link between vaccines & autism.
Whatever your belief or opinion is in this matter, I will always respect it.
Best of Luck!!!
metalflyer11 2 years ago
People make money off of things that work all the time. That's the entire basis to a capitalistic society. So that someone is making a profit is of no consequence.
I'm sorry to hear about your friend's son, but you're speaking irrationally. That event B happens after event A doesn't mean B is caused by A. This is basic logic.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
Comment removed
2DGorillaz192000 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
2DGorillaz192000 2 years ago 5
lmao, nice one.
mecher3k 2 years ago
Wow, this is crap...!
DarioGuti 2 years ago
Excellent. Subbed.
shameoncanada 2 years ago 5
subscribed. Good stuff.
C0nc0rdance 2 years ago 4
im so embarrassed that so many of those homeopathy idiots are Australian
queenboxi 2 years ago 17
lololol 'nailed it'!
Roy, I love your style, man. Is the 'update' a better microphone?
itry2brational 2 years ago 5
A few minor tweaks, and yes a "better" mic (they didn't have what I wanted, and I caved in and got something super cheap). Still not very good, but sounds a lot better than the last one.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
deRoy,
how dare you critique good people who only want to provide alternatives to modern medicine lol, just kidding. great video man, i love when these quacks get busted for their sketchy agendas built on b.s. and fantasy.
do you read the science based medicine blog? it's awesome.
great videos, keep it up!
& lol @ i think i just saw jesus.
TheEarthAbides 2 years ago 4
a plead to the scientific community .. do not forget about your ''social responsibility''
soleilangela 2 years ago
Can one of you show me just ''one'' empirical long term study that show me that it's perfectly safe to allow this vaccine to be injected into my child's body?
Can you prove to me that all these mommies who lost their little babies only hours and days after being vaccinated did not loose them because of the vaccination?
Which "valid'' empirical studies says that injecting Squalene, Thimerosal, and Mercury into a human body is safe?
How would you feel if it were your baby that you lost?
soleilangela 2 years ago
Right. A couple of things wrong here.
First, you're asking to prove that something doesn't do something. That's like asking me to prove I can't fly. No amount of not flying is going to convince you, or prove to you that I can't fly.
The correct question to ask is: Is there any empirical data to suggest X is the result of Y? This onus of proof is then on you to support your assertions.
continued...
deRoyLight 2 years ago
Mercury, squalene and the likes fit into something called threshold of toxicity. It's the basic principle behind toxicology. Toxicity is entirely relative. Everything is toxic once it passes the threshold of toxicity for the host. However, just like water can lead to water intoxication, what is dangerous in excess can actually be neutral, or even beneficial at certain proportions.
Things like thimerosol are actually beneficial, in that they kill bacteria to prevent infection.... continued.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
With this knowledge at hand, what you need to do is quite simple: Demonstrate that the dose of mercury found in thimerosol is enough to cause harm. Because as it stands, every scientific study has continued to publish results finding that the amount of mercury present in thimerosol is not enough to be harmful. So it would be your job now to find out why every credible study in the last decade has continued to conclude that the dose is not dangerous.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
The cure for cancer is know and those who do their own research instead of listening to government controlled studies and specialists, do know this.
So why doesn't ''most'' of our so called scientific community know about it?
They shall soon be humbled.
One who does research should know better then to blindly believe anything and to not consider all variables.
Hope this convinces you to do more research.
soleilangela 2 years ago
The cure for cancer is known?
Think about what you're saying for a second. If the cure for cancer is known, then there must have been scientific studies done to support this. If there are no scientific studies, then you can't make a statement like "the cure for cancer is known." Saying that studies are hidden is just a negative argument. Produce these scientific studies that provide a cure for cancer. If you can't do this, then you have no grounds to say this in the first place.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
When you are explaining something to people who don't know much about the subject matter, you have to explain what a pig is as though you were explaining it to an alien.
and if you are in the scientific community, you should know that pharmaceutical companies often are the ones paying for these studies and anything natural is a aggressively disapproved and or hidden.
soleilangela 2 years ago
deRoy, okay, well where are F Kennedy Jr. and Joseph Moshe?
What I am saying is that you are showing me people that I haven't even seen speaking up against vaccines.
What do you have to say about those who are? What are their motives? Are they all for natural remedies?
The video I saw where specialists were speaking up, had none of these people in it.
I'm just saying that this doesn't prove a point to me or I just do not get what you are trying to say with those video. No bad feelings.
soleilangela 2 years ago
I can't speak for your personal experience. There are certainly people without ulterior motives that reject vaccines (hence why there are numerous reasons for objection listed at the beginning of the video).
I'd also need you to recommend to me what video it is that you are talking about, so that I can know where you're coming from.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
5 stars!
felipooooo5 2 years ago
Spartan9688m, it is pretty much the contrary. Vaccination studies show the dangers, it is no secret, except for those who have not done their research.
soleilangela 2 years ago
You really have to be disconnected from the scientific community to make that kind of statement.
deRoyLight 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
um . .. the most important people speaking about vaccines are not here? and they are not natural medicine people though I do wonder why one would be against natural ways to heal ones self. I think that we can trust them more then those who love to stick chemicals in our bodies.
soleilangela 2 years ago
That is a logical fallacy called appeal to nature. Natural substances can be harmful, and aren't necessarily better at healing or curing disease than medicine that is made artificially. What you need is empirical evidence, which is what the anti-vaxxers don't have. All they have are anecdotes and assertions.
Spartan9688 2 years ago 6
03:19 "You sir are amazing!" ahahahaha I wet myself at that!
bettySwollox 2 years ago 3
gave you 5.
Albukhshi 2 years ago 2
There you go, 5 stars. Good work knocking down the woo!
TheBenEEeee 2 years ago 12