AMD Shows High Performance at Low Power

[JimmyCovers]

Although it does sort of compromise your viewing experince if someones checking there e-mails over your film :P

[JimmyCovers]

AMD IS WIN :D

[tatzi007]

Oh...you can play WOW! I can play that on my grandma's Toaster!...

[guru4games]

does that mean i can play crysis! with 16AA no warcraft is not demanding

[conyo985]

No you can't. Because integrated graphics can't handle high resolutions with medium to high settings. Every year games system requirements gets higher so get a discrete video card to get a good gaming experience.

[Foxynews]

you can get a discrete GPU, without a fan which can play those games (not with 16aa, but enough for a tv 4aa).

there is no way you need more than 4x anti-aliasing on a tv, because your over 3 meters removed from it and it runs @720/1080P, and the quality of a tv isn't as high as a pc monitor.

[jcng5]

Amd processor does not have HT function rite?

[kidowner]

HT means hyper threading right? if yes, than no, they have the HT function

[F00lishchild]

@jcng5 ht means hyper threading which means more than one thread amd athlon x2 has two threads and that's why it's dual core

[stoneofrefuge]

I am glad I am jumping in on the bandwagon on AMD. I am currently fixing to sell my Athlon single core tower at a low price with everything in it. I am currently in a market to getting the latest AMD chipset with a new processor.

[feffe85]

How cool aint that? That idiot thats talking in the video says that the AMD comp can do the same things as the Xbox360.. What a moron..

[qwertymac93]

it can, if you stick a 3850 in it...

[bezvezeceda]

Kill A watt. Hahhhaa.

[AMDphenom9600]

... i gather they have given up on the Phenoms then... bit dissapointing considering i have gone out and bought one, and even named my youtube name after it, come on AMD where as all of the good performance at low prices gone.

[XxMofasaxX]

they just didn't feel like using it i guess.You don't really need it here. They probably wanted a good but cheap processor that could get the job done. You should be happy with your processor if it is a quad core because that is a true quad core unlike Intel which isn't but yet way over priced $250-$1500. The $250 one isn't nearly as good as the Phenom though.

[MrBustyTheBest]

With Quiet'n'Cool AMD brought the power consumption efficiency to the desktop PC - Intel just follows AMD foot prints! ;)

[MooriaFTW]

like that tv dont use any power

[TCBinCHI]

like you dont know proper denglish ... anyway, they clearly show the power the tv is drawing. do you need a slo-mo version to catch it?

[shubhamranjan]

i can do better with intel

[Feircejaguar]

haha, you mean the crappy G35, even the Intels that CAN do this draw WAY TOO MUCH power. so, now what do you say?

[shubhamranjan]

now does intel make graphic cards

and you can use nvidia anyway and intel and AMD use same power for cpu trust me i it is Bullcrap

[Feircejaguar]

lool no, were talking about intergrated graphics...

[shubhamranjan]

lol but stil

[Feircejaguar]

still what? seriously think about it, the i cheaper, performs way better at very low power consumption, its like the best media motherboard EVER...

[shubhamranjan]

nah amd makes video cards so its an advantage unlike intel they should compare nvidia to amd then it makes sense

[Feircejaguar]

they are comparing intels similar platform "G35" to its direct rival "780G" and AMD pwned it!

[shubhamranjan]

they should compare it to the 780i then we will see who pwn who

i heard somethings about G37 from a couple friends who work at intel

[Feircejaguar]

the 780i is an nvidia board, not at Intel board that i was refering to that u originally said was better than this AMD chipset...and still, nvidia's boards have a crappy price/performance ratio not to mention the power consumption at full load

[shubhamranjan]

um yah they are a powerful though right now amd does rule in inetgarted graphics's only because of atis help however the g37s are suppose to be faster than amdss

[Feircejaguar]

well, we shall see, and dont forget amd's upcoming 4000 series graphics that are also going to be intergrated later...

[shubhamranjan]

lol i do plan to buy the 4000 series

addme has freind

[Feircejaguar]

i did...

[qwertymac93]

ati didn't "help", amd baut them, and paid big bucks for their expertise.

[staticxmako]

no idoit ther comparing without a gpu

intel just sucks ass

they dont have a quad core they stoll amds 45nm they dont make gpu's and ther gaming porformance sucks!

i compaired my old amd 1.5ghz antholon to the intel p4 1.5ghz

and the test was on counter strike

the intel was using 95 to 98% of its processing capabilite and the amd was using 59 to 68

[qwertymac93]

netburst sucked bawls, we all know so bring your rantings about last gen architectures elswere, core2 architecture is THE BEST FOR GAMES, look at some current benchmarks instead of dwelling in the past cause my 1.8ghz g5 DESTROYS both those chips, but that doesn't mean they suck or my chip is hella fast. oh and my g5 is 5 years old so haha.

[powerkiller1994]

you noobed