the Holland idiots actually have the nerve to say they can disprove the any shooter with this film. laughable. The video does not even include the time when the fatal head shot occurred. I guess I could go to Dallas today and if there isn't anyone in the grassy knoll, then that proves it!
Why is the Stemmons Freeway sign browned out in this film? Look at the Willis and Betzner photos and then watch this video again. WHY IS THERE NO STEMMONS FREEWAY SIGN???!!!!
Because it has a bullet hole in it and that would make things difficult to explain given the "3 shots" lie. In fact, there were 10 shots - all of which can be accounted for by physical evidence and seen in various YouTube videos.
@Aetius76 Something looks off there. I think I can make out something where the sign should be at 0:11. but why can't I see it as clearly as I do in the other photos from the pretty much same distance. why is there a skip before that. Dal Tex shot angle ?
I remember seeing a documentary on here and they clearly show most of these films that these people shot as being doctored. You can clearly see at 0:06 of this film that they're some frames missing right when the limo comes in front of TSBD. Watch Jackie's head as it skips forward from this time slot which most people put this as the first shot which missed the limo altogether. If you watch the film in frames, you can see JFK's right arm jerk back a little like he heard a sound.
I think pajasa62 (above) actually has a better explanation than the one I proposed.
Why, when film was expensive and most home movie cameras could only carry about two minutes' worth, would you keep filming the back of someone's head?
It seems likely that she stopped filming because the car had passed, and then started again when she realized something had happened.
Don't any of you know ANYTHING about the topic?...That Nix and Muchmore were filming on Houston Street as the car made it's turn from Main St? That the only reason they turned their cameras back on was IN REACTION to hearing shots? That Towner (a young girl), or any of them, had NO REASON to keep filming JFK once he left their field of vision?
And please, Zapruder, his secretary, his partner, any of the 15 Kodak lab techs (who initally saw the showing) never said his film was doctored!
Ditto. The only reason zapruders film shows the shots (albeit doctored in my opinion ) is because he sold it to TimeLife who publicised th contents before the secret service could get their hands on it . Clearly all the other films of dealey plaza show very little in order to corroborate the 'lone assassin' story ...
The Zapruder frames are 8mm. That's tiny, and it means the President's image, on the physical film, is about the size of the head of a pin. It would be VERY hard to doctor this.
But a better question is why, if doctored, they would have left in the "back and to the left" motion that pretty much sparked the conspiracy movement in the first place?
I haven't been able to find much information on it.
I think that operating those old film cameras required holding down a button. It's possible she just reflexively let go of it when she heard the first bang.
It also looks like the frames at the end were taken some time after the assassination.
the Holland idiots actually have the nerve to say they can disprove the any shooter with this film. laughable. The video does not even include the time when the fatal head shot occurred. I guess I could go to Dallas today and if there isn't anyone in the grassy knoll, then that proves it!
DCUPtoejuice 3 months ago
she just missed the shooting by a few seconds
hownos 3 months ago
Why is the Stemmons Freeway sign browned out in this film? Look at the Willis and Betzner photos and then watch this video again. WHY IS THERE NO STEMMONS FREEWAY SIGN???!!!!
Aetius76 10 months ago
@Aetius76
Because it has a bullet hole in it and that would make things difficult to explain given the "3 shots" lie. In fact, there were 10 shots - all of which can be accounted for by physical evidence and seen in various YouTube videos.
LiquorWreckedEmGood 5 months ago
@Aetius76 Something looks off there. I think I can make out something where the sign should be at 0:11. but why can't I see it as clearly as I do in the other photos from the pretty much same distance. why is there a skip before that. Dal Tex shot angle ?
MickeyMorandini1 3 months ago
@Aetius76 I think freeway sign is still far off frame even at 0:13
DCUPtoejuice 3 months ago
Creepy to think Oswald/the assassin is staring down at JFK-probably already through the telescopic sight- as we look at him here.
MALCBAGGIE 1 year ago
Looks like a few frames a missing where it jerks.
GravityBoy72 1 year ago
I remember seeing a documentary on here and they clearly show most of these films that these people shot as being doctored. You can clearly see at 0:06 of this film that they're some frames missing right when the limo comes in front of TSBD. Watch Jackie's head as it skips forward from this time slot which most people put this as the first shot which missed the limo altogether. If you watch the film in frames, you can see JFK's right arm jerk back a little like he heard a sound.
6021diesel 2 years ago
Ok, I saw nothing...What did I miss?
maxwellthedog 2 years ago
INVASTIGATION SOLVED!!! ..WATCH THIS CLIP !!!!!
watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo&feature=re lated
SPREAD THE WORD !!!!!!!
BeAGentlaman 2 years ago
I think pajasa62 (above) actually has a better explanation than the one I proposed.
Why, when film was expensive and most home movie cameras could only carry about two minutes' worth, would you keep filming the back of someone's head?
It seems likely that she stopped filming because the car had passed, and then started again when she realized something had happened.
UdallIn72 2 years ago
Don't any of you know ANYTHING about the topic?...That Nix and Muchmore were filming on Houston Street as the car made it's turn from Main St? That the only reason they turned their cameras back on was IN REACTION to hearing shots? That Towner (a young girl), or any of them, had NO REASON to keep filming JFK once he left their field of vision?
And please, Zapruder, his secretary, his partner, any of the 15 Kodak lab techs (who initally saw the showing) never said his film was doctored!
pajasa62 3 years ago
every film of the assassination.....at some point during the 6 seconds....is missing frames, or they skip ahead. everyone one of them.
sidellr 3 years ago
Ditto. The only reason zapruders film shows the shots (albeit doctored in my opinion ) is because he sold it to TimeLife who publicised th contents before the secret service could get their hands on it . Clearly all the other films of dealey plaza show very little in order to corroborate the 'lone assassin' story ...
mrtripsterlfc 3 years ago
The Zapruder frames are 8mm. That's tiny, and it means the President's image, on the physical film, is about the size of the head of a pin. It would be VERY hard to doctor this.
But a better question is why, if doctored, they would have left in the "back and to the left" motion that pretty much sparked the conspiracy movement in the first place?
UdallIn72 2 years ago
yeh quite
mrtripsterlfc 3 years ago
Where are the missing frames?
Am I missing something, here?
Mobilecheese 3 years ago
Suspicious much?
bendtx 3 years ago
Why are the actual shots cut from this film?!?!
mrtripsterlfc 3 years ago
I haven't been able to find much information on it.
I think that operating those old film cameras required holding down a button. It's possible she just reflexively let go of it when she heard the first bang.
It also looks like the frames at the end were taken some time after the assassination.
UdallIn72 3 years ago
I think this film does have the first missed shot footage, then as you say she stopped filming maybe being startled.
baseballeddie1177 2 years ago