Was there ever a better player than Arthur Blake.............. nah stupid question... Hey mate that's really well done. When I try do play it I usually have all the parts in a different spot and then I find I've missed 2 OR 3 sections and put bits of other songs in,,,,,,, Man it's real tough on the thumb too,.... takes the skin right off,,,, but I think Blake was just skin on string so I'll have to put up with it. 15 years ago I never heard him done, NOW there's dozens of good Blakers, Great eh
Thanks to you and ddking for the comments.. I like to think my version is pretty faithful - until I go back and listen to Blake, and have to pick my jaw up off the floor again!
Was there ever a better player than Arthur Blake.............. nah stupid question... Hey mate that's really well done. When I try do play it I usually have all the parts in a different spot and then I find I've missed 2 OR 3 sections and put bits of other songs in,,,,,,, Man it's real tough on the thumb too,.... takes the skin right off,,,, but I think Blake was just skin on string so I'll have to put up with it. 15 years ago I never heard him done, NOW there's dozens of good Blakers, Great eh
gregluland 5 months ago
WOW...excellent pickin! you do Blind Blake justice for sure!
Blueinvt 1 year ago
hey rick, was listening to your cd today and thought to to look you up on the tube, great to hear you and great picking*****
songmansinatra120 2 years ago
A very nice guitar rag! Your lack of comments suggests that you're seriously underrated, 5 stars , well done!
caulfield111 3 years ago 2
Excellant :-))
houndheadhenry 4 years ago
About as good an approximation of Blake in terms of technical virtuosity and feel for the music as anything here- maybe anywhere.
fontanalis 4 years ago
Thanks to you and ddking for the comments.. I like to think my version is pretty faithful - until I go back and listen to Blake, and have to pick my jaw up off the floor again!
rilowite 4 years ago
great !!
ddking66 4 years ago