This technology should be pursued and supported. Hope the oil companies don't use their money and clout to derail these efforts like they did with the improved batteries and the electric car.
ok, well its time for folks to look up the geopolitics of water... And the shortages that are already affecting the world... the problem with water is its also needed to sustain life.
Lol, and what happens when we run out of water? Are we gonna by cases of bottled gas to drink? This is amazing however, the point is we use too much in excess. There needs to be moderation which means we need to get our big butts up off the couch and start walking to the store that's down the street instead of driving short distances.
If they can't give us a clue about how it runs then they are an investor scam. A lot of them over the centures. Probably expensive chemicals and electrodes in the box.
This video was posted in 2009. To my knowledge these are not being mass produced. But this still may be possible, considering that the water in Japan is radio active! : )
If this works they have to be using a catalyst water resonates at 3.145 THZ so good luck reaching a wave form of just 970nm... Without a catalyst or something like a special wave forum or glitch or something added I dunno how it could be possible but I really do support there efforts and hope they get the funding. I wonder if you divided the wave down to something that was reasonable like lets say cutting it in 30 they do it with antenna all the time so I suppose it may be possible IDK...
Sadly this, and the ambitious plans to put solar panels in the Sahara, won't factor at all in the elections. And if it is, it'll be quickly drowned out and overruled by the ignoramuses who think drilling in Alaska is still a might fine idea.
250 000 american motorists are currently breaking the laws of physics to operate their free energy from water vehicles with an overunity process that has been around since 1890
@se7ensnakes Sad, tragic really. The truth will set you free, after it entirely pisses you off when you realize that since Tesla anyone or anything that threatens the profits of the corporations who are threatening life on earth will be denied, murdered, and suppressed. They have turned Earth into Hell on Earth and will not stop unless people WAKE UP and Stop It. Occupy Earth - It Past time. What is good for everyone and everything is good for everyone and anything.
@MakesMeAngry I cannot imagine how this could work, however, time and time again establish scientist have been dumbfounded when they make claims of impossibility and then proving possible. If you know anything about history you look and see. One of the most notable were the wright brothers who were called a fraud by Scientific American. Months earlier a recipient of the french academy of sciences award wrote a paper how with present technology flying was impossible.
An old, recurring fake story... Science-minded folks should be able to see through this. Look up "water fuelled car" on wikipedia and you will see a good summary of its history. Of course, conspiracy theorists can always claim that oil companies and governments are suppressing the truth, blah blah. They do do that, but not on this particular front.
@WHEPro Really?I just saw this for the first time and got excited.Then I saw the vid was from 09,that burst my bubble a bit and now I'm back and you're saying it's old and fake.Damn,this'd be great if it worked,we could everything with it.Bummer
So that's about 40 - 60 mpg right? How much horsepower can one of these have? Does it have any real practical use beyond a grocery getter for citiots?
Isnt that a Reva? That's a Indian Manufactured Reva. It's built here in the city where I live...Bangalore. The Japs have just added that generator stuff..
Burning hydrogen = oxidization producing water....but not as much as the H2 was derived from. All energy transfers entail some inefficiencies. 100% efficiency = only the same amount of energy required to break the H-O bonds.This would be the electro-chemical equivalent of the perpetual motion machine, completely unsustainable.
Another case of the "disinformation" phenomenon: only part of the truth is shown. Basically, this runs on batteries - wall-outlet power fed into a battery. The battery's energy is then, instead of being used to power the electric motor, is being used to mess with water and pull out almost exactly the same amount of electricity "from" the water. "Ooh! That's great! No problem, I'll plug in my battery!" - it still dies when the battery dies. I'll take pure electric plug-in cars, thanks!
Good idea. Just one question: Isn't water a more precious resource than oil ? If, for instance,this becomes commonplace then it is it not logical to think that water supplies would be diminished. Or even sea levels falling? It would seem more logical to find a fuel alternative that is renewable. No offence intended; just curious. Perhaps I'm missing a crucial point here.
@donsaiditwoud Yes.. it's a law taught in chemistry 101. Matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Water is at the resting state energy level after oxygen and hydrogen combine. This reaction is occuring all the time in nature and we will never run out of water. Even in our gasoline fueled internal combustion engines, a small amount of water and co2 are produced.
This may seem like a stupid question but how is water formed? If we are splitting H2O molecules faster than they can form, will we be losing water on the earth?
@flowy420 as much as you have a very good point , shouldn't use "losing" water be a good problem on the aftermath of global warming ? instead of flooding , using water to power cars , at a global scale , it would be a good idea
@flowy420 Good question. I've heard all the water that is on earth now has all ways been here, and it got here viva comets and such. So nature does not produce and destroy it. it changes forms but never on a molecular level. If we ran on this technology for a LONG time I could see it being a bad thing. But its a good stepping stone.
@Maddoxx343 I've heard it many times while watching documentaries about the formation of earth. Most of the water that is here now, has been here since the birth of our planet. When comets get inside of our atmosphere, there moisture gets trapped, and joins our recycling process.
@flowy420 you realize that the Earth is 75% covered in water?? we will not run out especially since we have far less oil than water and there seems to be enough of that to go around, except when the big Oil companies need more money ,.. then there seems to be a shortage and prices go up.
@flowy420 When you burn hydrogen as fuel.. you are recombining it with oxygen... and you get water out of the exhaust. You won't be losing water.. you might be losing oxygen and that's were reclaiming land for reforestation is important.
At first, I was quite excited because I hate the fact that it's 2011 and we're still draining our natural resources to power our vehicles, but I don't believe that water is the best alternative. Water is the most important natural resource, and if you thought we needed oil to get by, you've never gone without water, have you? :/
Water is more precious than gas. It's genius on a small scale, but water is the most precious resource in the world. Shall we drain the oceans? Sounds like Easter Island. Who drank the last glass of water on earth?
All these people saying this is bullshit makes me QQ and lol. Guess what there is smarter people in the world then you and me. So maybe just maybe they found a way. We should be dancing in the streets. Tho now they will prob make a massive tax on water, QQ.
This is total bulls#*+. It is true that you can produce electricity in a fuel cell by recombining hydrogen and oxygen, but separating the two through electrolysis requires far more energy than you will get back so the net result is energy-negative. Entropy, a fundamental law of physics, says this will never work the way they are claiming, there needs to be an external energy source.
If so, the energy released from that process could be greater than the energy used to obtain the hydrogen from the water. The external energy being the form of the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in the water? . I'd love if this was real.
@PresidentBust no it was a an electrochemical reaction similar to metal hydride reaction but instead of burning hydrogen.. it was used to create a battery. I believe that the metal in the generator would eventually be consumed and probably costly to manufacture.
@furtadjp catalysts can lower the energy needed to crack water... even then, this car doesn't burn hydrogen but uses the hydrogen's electrons for energy transfer.
@julyraeofsunshine So where does the energy come from? Water is the product of an energetic reaction (hydrogen burns in the presence of oxygen), not a precursor. It takes energy to split water back into hydrogen and oxygen, so you must have an external source of energy. Unless they've somehow found a way around everything we know about chemistry and physics, this is bollocks.
Looks cool, however, it will not pass our strict american crash tests. If it does make it into the market, it will only be driven in cities because it is too slow to drive on a highway.
@gaproman123 Actually, a boat runs on water. Just as a car runs on pavement. A play on words obviously, but you were too dull to get it, unless you are just trolling.
oh geez ... just check the Wikipedia entry on "water-fueled cars". There is no energy to be had in water unless you split off the hydrogen. To do so requires energy.
Next, be sure you also invest in the Hojo motor. That's a good one too.
The fact that the reporter said it runs on "Hydrogen Dioxide", which is HO2, not H2O (correct me if im wrong), and also that this is fucking madness leads me to conclude this is fake. I'll be the first to applaud if im wrong.
@chrisvarns You are correct. That jumped right out at me when she said it. I don't know if it affects the validity of anything, but it does prove the reporter is an idiot who wanted to sound smart by saying the chemical name instead of the familiar name. Dihydrogen Monoxide, lady.
Second law of thermodynamics: Energy out is always less than energy in. Translation: If it takes 100 joules of energy to break down the H2O into elemental H, you will only get a fraction of that back in the electrical generation. Simply put, you lose energy every time you run this contraption. I would guess that if you too the sample and ran it for more than a few hours, even keeping the water tank full, it would stop fairly soon. This is, in a word, a scam.
@yassensei The company went out of business.. apparently it was costly to produce the generator. It probably used some kind of reaction similar to barium peroxide and water to produce hydrogen peroxide and then the h2o2 is used to fuel the electron transport. Not necesarily a scam.. but I don't see any backyard inventors recreating this technology.
@yassensei So you are saying that naturally occurring liquids cannot possibly have more energy stored inside then it takes to initiate a chemical reaction to release? Explain then the energy stored in petroleum that is released by fire? The laws of thermodynamics still apply the universe used energy to make the petrol and the water it is absolutely possible to release stored energy through a chemical reaction.
@rathtain You obviously failed your high school chemistry class. Water is the product of the reaction, 2(H2) + O2 ---> 2(H2O). Energy is released during this reaction. To go the opposite direction, 2(H2O) ---> 2(H2) + O2, you must put energy IN. To make the free hydrogen gas, you must ADD energy. If you do, the amount that you put in will be greater than you had originally gotten out, simply because there will be losses of energy due to heat, friction, electrical inefficiencies, etc.
@rathtain OTOH, a combustion reaction such as (CH4) + 2(O2) --> (CO2) + 2(H2O) [burning methane] releases energy. While, indeed, the amount of energy released comes from the chemical bonds, if you wanted to reverse the process, it would take more energy than you get out. Simply, if you store 100 joules of energy, you would waste 20 or 30 joules (or more) simply running the machine which makes this reaction go. If this were not true, why haven't companies already done it?
Even with all the environmentalist stuff going round these days this still wont make it to mass market worldwide. Now why would that be.? Oh that's it, oil money is more important than saving the planet. Not that i believe it needs saving from us anyway.
This technology has been around for some time now, however, the politics of the USA will not allow it here. There are even mopeds/mini bikes from Japan that are fuel injected but are not allowed to be in the USA. They get out standing gas millage!!
There's always some idiot making negative comments about these technologies that are here to help humanity. They are either brainwashed, cool aid drinking fools, or they are actually working for the elitist.
@pk525 I don't drink cool aid, and I'm not sure whether I work for the elitists or not. I work fir the government in a country that's pretty rich in oil so probably yes.Is believing in the commonly accepted laws of physics being brainwashed? BTW, would I know if I were brainwashed? Probably not. Put me down for one and a half, or even two out of three. I'm pretty sure about the cool aid though.
@disturbed1777 Your assuming that the water molecule is "cracked" by conventional hydrolysis. It's not. It's cracked by a radio wave designed to precisely hit the exact harmonic of the molecule. The electronic box that produces the radio wave takes only a small amount of power.
@originalcause So you can get more energy out of H2 and O merging into water than you originally used for splitting them? That means we can get infinite amounts of energy from absolutely nowhere! And with infinite amounts of energy comes infinite amounts of matter as well. We can build an entire new planet from nothing and live there when there's not enough room left on Earth. WOWEE! Rewriting the first law of thermodynamics will have to be considered a minor problem.
Umm... Anyone else going to call BS on this? Producing hydrogen from water requires more energy than you can extract from the resulting hydrogen. Even if the process was 100% efficient, you would only be able to extract as much power as you put in, and just have a cycle that produced 0 net power.
@beerandbanjo Minor problem - unless they've found a new miracle method of splitting off the Hydrogen, it takes more power to split water into Oxygen and Hydrogen than you get out of converting it back.
Fuel cells have been around for a long time. In general, yes, you can break water into H2 and O2. You can then recombine the H2 and O2 in a fuel cell to generate electricity. But it takes more to split than you get out so can't be done in a closed-circuit car.
Its nothing new though is it? this info has been around for decades only to be suppressed by the big finance houses that have culminated in the death of the inventors. It would be awesome for Japan if instead of applying for a patent they made the knowledge freely available to everybody. Just think how the world would view Japan then :D #luvnpeace guys
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
@74pbg Hey, maybe you dont realize where you are. Youre on utube, a kind of twilight zone where logic, rationality, truth, common sense, honesty, sanity, personal resposibility, and many of the higher traits and virtues of mankind cease to operate.
The US will never allow this car in the country. Toyota makes a small truck that is a diesel that gets 70 MPG and the US will not allow it in the country.
French tecnology, sold to TATA (India), but is not to be developed so soon as petrol lobby is very strong. , besides how will the various governments make their money .
French tecnology, sold to TATA (India), but is not to be developed so soon as petrol lobby is very strong. , besides how will the various goerments make their money .
they'll totally sink japan into the ocean before the production of this vehicle... dick cheney and the bush criminals cannot have their empire and cash flow threatened... that's the truth
Technology Long Forbidden From Us by the elite as To Have It Would Give Us Freedom. Down With Satanism. Down With the Corrupted 'elites' and minorities who support this evil thrust upon the West. All within our militaries and and security industries who are not irredemably corrupted and have retained some diginity, nobility and integrity (against MK conditioning) must unite with the people and retake the land.
Why do conspiracy theorists all over the world tend to capitalize their sentences more than the rest of us? Do you think Words Are Given More Impact because of this weird habit? They may i suggest CAPS LOCK FOR FULL EMPHASIS! IT BEATS THE WORDS INTO OUR BRAINS more effectively and makes us take you more seriously. Really.
@Slameye because it's hard to get washed brains drenched in aspartame to smarten up and listen in the first place, hence the need for beating CAPS... just sayin'...
This isn't fake. If you do a bit of research you can read all about it. Also, when claims of this type have been fraudulent they are always asking for money from someone. Genepax is not asking for investors, simply a company willing to bring it into production. A man in his garage invented a blow torch that runs on water and he made a conversion for his car as well.
There are many alternatives to oil but our retarded society cant put profits on the back burner and do something productive.
@adiostraitorobama yeah especially when we are sitting on top of more than 2 billion barrels right now. its supposed to be under the rockies. dosent even include whats in out war reserve. sad really...those dune coons would rather see us all dead but they like our money too much.
No need to water.. we will fight for it in the future.. So keep water out of it ok? Let's use magnets all over the world.. (it ends?) :)
Luckzzz 1 day ago
This technology should be pursued and supported. Hope the oil companies don't use their money and clout to derail these efforts like they did with the improved batteries and the electric car.
RedHues 1 week ago
Isn't water already more expensive than gas
eaglechiro 1 week ago
ok, well its time for folks to look up the geopolitics of water... And the shortages that are already affecting the world... the problem with water is its also needed to sustain life.
IndiaTravelFilms 1 week ago
Doh! I meant "buy"
444yeahright 2 weeks ago
Lol, and what happens when we run out of water? Are we gonna by cases of bottled gas to drink? This is amazing however, the point is we use too much in excess. There needs to be moderation which means we need to get our big butts up off the couch and start walking to the store that's down the street instead of driving short distances.
444yeahright 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lets see if America sends some one to Japan to kill this inventer NWO oil leaders wont like this.
ahernandez4110 2 weeks ago
this technology has been around forever. its about time someone is mass producing it!!!
gman2677 3 weeks ago 3
If they can't give us a clue about how it runs then they are an investor scam. A lot of them over the centures. Probably expensive chemicals and electrodes in the box.
gewraldruzkalukaniuk 3 weeks ago
This video was posted in 2009. To my knowledge these are not being mass produced. But this still may be possible, considering that the water in Japan is radio active! : )
TheFlownetwork 3 weeks ago
If this works they have to be using a catalyst water resonates at 3.145 THZ so good luck reaching a wave form of just 970nm... Without a catalyst or something like a special wave forum or glitch or something added I dunno how it could be possible but I really do support there efforts and hope they get the funding. I wonder if you divided the wave down to something that was reasonable like lets say cutting it in 30 they do it with antenna all the time so I suppose it may be possible IDK...
mopowah 3 weeks ago
Sadly this, and the ambitious plans to put solar panels in the Sahara, won't factor at all in the elections. And if it is, it'll be quickly drowned out and overruled by the ignoramuses who think drilling in Alaska is still a might fine idea.
superleviathan 3 weeks ago
did you know the guy who invented this was murdered...
DVAFP 3 weeks ago
u watch the NWO condemn this, after all theres no money in water -_-
crayzeesteve 3 weeks ago
250 000 american motorists are currently breaking the laws of physics to operate their free energy from water vehicles with an overunity process that has been around since 1890
outshore 3 weeks ago
You will never see it in the US.
mistermassive1 3 weeks ago
What happens to the water once the elements have been extracted? It sounds great but what are the rest of the facts?
rjones150 3 weeks ago
2years later and we still paying even more crazy fuel prices.. good post
MakaveliSoulja2010 3 weeks ago
Nothing new here. Stan Ovshinsky created these fuel cells twenty uears ago. Theu are used in the Bus systems in Italy
chrisbright23 3 weeks ago
ha if you think that the oil companies are going t allow this you must be dreaming. They will buy and bury the technology.
se7ensnakes 3 weeks ago
@se7ensnakes Sad, tragic really. The truth will set you free, after it entirely pisses you off when you realize that since Tesla anyone or anything that threatens the profits of the corporations who are threatening life on earth will be denied, murdered, and suppressed. They have turned Earth into Hell on Earth and will not stop unless people WAKE UP and Stop It. Occupy Earth - It Past time. What is good for everyone and everything is good for everyone and anything.
abracadabrais 3 weeks ago 3
@se7ensnakes ~ Sad but true.
pleased9 3 weeks ago
lol do you think the cocksucking oil company's will let you sell this?
2pac057 3 weeks ago
What bullshit fraud. Shitting insane conspiracy fucking loons who don't know basic science.
MakesMeAngry 3 weeks ago
@MakesMeAngry I cannot imagine how this could work, however, time and time again establish scientist have been dumbfounded when they make claims of impossibility and then proving possible. If you know anything about history you look and see. One of the most notable were the wright brothers who were called a fraud by Scientific American. Months earlier a recipient of the french academy of sciences award wrote a paper how with present technology flying was impossible.
se7ensnakes 3 weeks ago
@MakesMeAngry Rather than make claims i take a wait and see attitude. No I would not invest money in this.
se7ensnakes 3 weeks ago
In This House, We Obey The Laws Of Thermodynamics!
MrRicounet 3 weeks ago 18
An old, recurring fake story... Science-minded folks should be able to see through this. Look up "water fuelled car" on wikipedia and you will see a good summary of its history. Of course, conspiracy theorists can always claim that oil companies and governments are suppressing the truth, blah blah. They do do that, but not on this particular front.
WHEPro 3 weeks ago
@WHEPro Really?I just saw this for the first time and got excited.Then I saw the vid was from 09,that burst my bubble a bit and now I'm back and you're saying it's old and fake.Damn,this'd be great if it worked,we could everything with it.Bummer
TerryTresner 3 weeks ago
Leave it to the Japanese.
TerryTresner 3 weeks ago
How the fuck they split the water? You need energy for that..
mieggiel2 3 weeks ago 4
@mieggiel2 It's called a battery.
NotQuiteLucid 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
mieggiel2 3 weeks ago
So that's about 40 - 60 mpg right? How much horsepower can one of these have? Does it have any real practical use beyond a grocery getter for citiots?
waypasthadenough 3 weeks ago
en.wikipedia. o r g/wiki/REVA & w w w.nextconceptcars .c o m/worldwide-news/reva-the-car-that-runs-with-water/
punnyabrata 1 month ago
Isnt that a Reva? That's a Indian Manufactured Reva. It's built here in the city where I live...Bangalore. The Japs have just added that generator stuff..
punnyabrata 1 month ago
most people in the world dont even water to drink and they wanna us it as fuel? i dont know if its a good idea or a bad 1
crzykd 1 month ago
@crzykd
Most? I doubt that. Many places yes but not most. Certainly not where I live nor in most heavily populated areas...
waypasthadenough 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Soon when japan said they was going to mass produce this car they got HARRP
Superstarent 1 month ago
Soon when japan said they was going to mass produce this car they got HARRP
Superstarent 1 month ago
Fuck... At 6 foot 6 inches I don't fit in that small Japanese vehicle! Lets hope they make American models with this technology.
StarcraftAlphaBeta 1 month ago
This seems totally legit..
oggmonster89 1 month ago
SCAM
danwat1234 1 month ago
Water is what you get when you burn hydrogen in the presence of oxygen.
It is ash if you like. You can take ash and with the addition of lots of energy burn it again but why bother?
alanrlow 1 month ago
Burning hydrogen = oxidization producing water....but not as much as the H2 was derived from. All energy transfers entail some inefficiencies. 100% efficiency = only the same amount of energy required to break the H-O bonds.This would be the electro-chemical equivalent of the perpetual motion machine, completely unsustainable.
1willyvon 1 month ago
Not to fret, Big Oil will buy 'em out
Rest assured, you'll still be dumping a large portion of your paycheck into your gas tank. ; )
HHenkelmann 1 month ago
Another case of the "disinformation" phenomenon: only part of the truth is shown. Basically, this runs on batteries - wall-outlet power fed into a battery. The battery's energy is then, instead of being used to power the electric motor, is being used to mess with water and pull out almost exactly the same amount of electricity "from" the water. "Ooh! That's great! No problem, I'll plug in my battery!" - it still dies when the battery dies. I'll take pure electric plug-in cars, thanks!
Volatus 1 month ago
Not exactly the best choice for a desert trip =/
Zatiels 1 month ago
still need energy to charge the batteries to do the electrolysis on the h2o. wheres the energy to charge the batteries coming from
hecojoe 1 month ago
@hecojoe An initial precharge (just the once) could do that. Then the car would charge the batteries as normal.
PresidentBust 1 month ago
Good idea. Just one question: Isn't water a more precious resource than oil ? If, for instance,this becomes commonplace then it is it not logical to think that water supplies would be diminished. Or even sea levels falling? It would seem more logical to find a fuel alternative that is renewable. No offence intended; just curious. Perhaps I'm missing a crucial point here.
donsaiditwoud 1 month ago
@donsaiditwoud how about urine?
vikula1 1 month ago
@donsaiditwoud Yes.. it's a law taught in chemistry 101. Matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Water is at the resting state energy level after oxygen and hydrogen combine. This reaction is occuring all the time in nature and we will never run out of water. Even in our gasoline fueled internal combustion engines, a small amount of water and co2 are produced.
roninmd 1 month ago
is this going to be available in the US sometime down the road? i wonder what the prices will be
MrGiggity890 1 month ago
This may seem like a stupid question but how is water formed? If we are splitting H2O molecules faster than they can form, will we be losing water on the earth?
flowy420 1 month ago
@flowy420 as much as you have a very good point , shouldn't use "losing" water be a good problem on the aftermath of global warming ? instead of flooding , using water to power cars , at a global scale , it would be a good idea
perfectpredator11 1 month ago
@flowy420 Good question. I've heard all the water that is on earth now has all ways been here, and it got here viva comets and such. So nature does not produce and destroy it. it changes forms but never on a molecular level. If we ran on this technology for a LONG time I could see it being a bad thing. But its a good stepping stone.
NothingIsNew88 1 month ago
@NothingIsNew88 where do u get this info about h2o coming in comets? this is mindblowing
Maddoxx343 1 month ago
@Maddoxx343 I've heard it many times while watching documentaries about the formation of earth. Most of the water that is here now, has been here since the birth of our planet. When comets get inside of our atmosphere, there moisture gets trapped, and joins our recycling process.
NothingIsNew88 1 month ago
@flowy420 you realize that the Earth is 75% covered in water?? we will not run out especially since we have far less oil than water and there seems to be enough of that to go around, except when the big Oil companies need more money ,.. then there seems to be a shortage and prices go up.
DRUMSKAPE 1 month ago
@DRUMSKAPE exactly, and the water doesn't get destroyed, lol
MrGiggity890 1 month ago
@flowy420 When you burn hydrogen as fuel.. you are recombining it with oxygen... and you get water out of the exhaust. You won't be losing water.. you might be losing oxygen and that's were reclaiming land for reforestation is important.
roninmd 1 month ago
HHO technology is very real.
I do not care if it is not feasible to make it for free. As long as it ain't 40.00 a barrel.. who cares?
The only existing safe alternatives to HHO are hemp seed oil derived bio-diesels.
RooFx 1 month ago
bogus
fosterch11 1 month ago
I think it cleans the water as it makes the car run.
inquisitivelogic 1 month ago
@inquisitivelogic
Hint: You can google 'HHO' and do some research instead of guessing.
RooFx 1 month ago
At first, I was quite excited because I hate the fact that it's 2011 and we're still draining our natural resources to power our vehicles, but I don't believe that water is the best alternative. Water is the most important natural resource, and if you thought we needed oil to get by, you've never gone without water, have you? :/
xTheEmilyx 1 month ago
@xTheEmilyx
You are mixing apples with oranges.
That car is not destroying the water. It is converting it to Hydrogen. Pure water vapor comes out of the exhaust system.
RooFx 1 month ago
@RooFx Actually it does destroy the water, but the waste gas is totally safe as it is pure oxygen.
MrGSmith129 1 month ago
This is great. Hope to see it out for the public soon
TheTigerLilly8 1 month ago
Water is more precious than gas. It's genius on a small scale, but water is the most precious resource in the world. Shall we drain the oceans? Sounds like Easter Island. Who drank the last glass of water on earth?
TheStaxxbrothers 1 month ago
@TheStaxxbrothers
sigh: see above..
RooFx 1 month ago
It's very interesting, but I'm going to remain skeptical until I see this for myself.
JamesFrizell 1 month ago
So what happened to the Car?
geekat02 1 month ago 2
This is a few years old -if it's real then GOD everyone would want one! Water is way cheaper than gas -duh....
I bet the other car companies don't want this to come out.
jetreschau 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great !!! I wonder when they are going to make this available for my Huge Fat A55 in my Huge SUV. :)
Nickkontalonis 1 month ago
Comment removed
Nickkontalonis 1 month ago
All these people saying this is bullshit makes me QQ and lol. Guess what there is smarter people in the world then you and me. So maybe just maybe they found a way. We should be dancing in the streets. Tho now they will prob make a massive tax on water, QQ.
dannyboy19811 1 month ago
This is total bulls#*+. It is true that you can produce electricity in a fuel cell by recombining hydrogen and oxygen, but separating the two through electrolysis requires far more energy than you will get back so the net result is energy-negative. Entropy, a fundamental law of physics, says this will never work the way they are claiming, there needs to be an external energy source.
furtadjp 1 month ago
@furtadjp Could they be burning the hydrogen?
If so, the energy released from that process could be greater than the energy used to obtain the hydrogen from the water. The external energy being the form of the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in the water? . I'd love if this was real.
PresidentBust 1 month ago
@PresidentBust no it was a an electrochemical reaction similar to metal hydride reaction but instead of burning hydrogen.. it was used to create a battery. I believe that the metal in the generator would eventually be consumed and probably costly to manufacture.
roninmd 1 month ago
@furtadjp catalysts can lower the energy needed to crack water... even then, this car doesn't burn hydrogen but uses the hydrogen's electrons for energy transfer.
roninmd 1 month ago
Sounds too good to be true. And it probably is.
Swamifred 1 month ago
@Swamifred nonsense. Don't underestimate technology- even better is possible.
julyraeofsunshine 1 month ago
@julyraeofsunshine So where does the energy come from? Water is the product of an energetic reaction (hydrogen burns in the presence of oxygen), not a precursor. It takes energy to split water back into hydrogen and oxygen, so you must have an external source of energy. Unless they've somehow found a way around everything we know about chemistry and physics, this is bollocks.
Swamifred 1 month ago
Looks cool, however, it will not pass our strict american crash tests. If it does make it into the market, it will only be driven in cities because it is too slow to drive on a highway.
myrcavich 1 month ago
I need one. NOW.
Anyone who is against this achievement is an outright idiot.
Kemonokami 1 month ago
I want one now!!! lol but its so small :(
roo2rio 1 month ago
Japanese <3
Starvoid7 1 month ago
I have a car that runs on water. We call it a boat.
megaforcemedia 1 month ago 15
@megaforcemedia Actually.. Boats run on fuel... And a boat isn't a car...
gaproman123 1 month ago
@gaproman123 Actually, a boat runs on water. Just as a car runs on pavement. A play on words obviously, but you were too dull to get it, unless you are just trolling.
myrcavich 1 month ago
@megaforcemedia No your boat runs IN water not on water!!
bigcoolviking 1 month ago
@megaforcemedia so youre either sailing or burning fossil fuels to propel yourself
Maddoxx343 1 month ago
@megaforcemedia
You boat still needs gasoline ; )
HHenkelmann 1 month ago 17
@megaforcemedia um....dont boats use gasoline....*facepalm*
KayKupcake777 1 month ago
@KayKupcake777 I'm... assuming you're not serious.
syndrome2009 1 month ago
oh geez ... just check the Wikipedia entry on "water-fueled cars". There is no energy to be had in water unless you split off the hydrogen. To do so requires energy.
Next, be sure you also invest in the Hojo motor. That's a good one too.
MarcinNA2 1 month ago
Every one drives it would dry out the earth in 3 years
TheBlackmamba002 1 month ago
Too bad this company went under before this video was posted.
PlushifiedNaruto 1 month ago 2
take it to Russia, they like the best tech available.
crimsoncoin 1 month ago
this could improve our air, cheapen the cost of travel and give alot more access to amenities
crimsoncoin 1 month ago
The fact that the reporter said it runs on "Hydrogen Dioxide", which is HO2, not H2O (correct me if im wrong), and also that this is fucking madness leads me to conclude this is fake. I'll be the first to applaud if im wrong.
chrisvarns 1 month ago 2
@chrisvarns i would love to believe this, but yes you are right it should be essentially DiHydrogen Monoxide = H2O
lz4broc 1 month ago
@chrisvarns You are correct. That jumped right out at me when she said it. I don't know if it affects the validity of anything, but it does prove the reporter is an idiot who wanted to sound smart by saying the chemical name instead of the familiar name. Dihydrogen Monoxide, lady.
TheBigCray 1 month ago
there still needs to be an energy source...energy cannot just be created...what is driving the reaction and from where is that energy derived?
nicksophile 1 month ago
@nicksophile Electrons from hydrogen dioxide, derived from water.
robrec0rd 1 month ago
Second law of thermodynamics: Energy out is always less than energy in. Translation: If it takes 100 joules of energy to break down the H2O into elemental H, you will only get a fraction of that back in the electrical generation. Simply put, you lose energy every time you run this contraption. I would guess that if you too the sample and ran it for more than a few hours, even keeping the water tank full, it would stop fairly soon. This is, in a word, a scam.
yassensei 1 month ago 9
@yassensei The company went out of business.. apparently it was costly to produce the generator. It probably used some kind of reaction similar to barium peroxide and water to produce hydrogen peroxide and then the h2o2 is used to fuel the electron transport. Not necesarily a scam.. but I don't see any backyard inventors recreating this technology.
roninmd 1 month ago
@yassensei So you are saying that naturally occurring liquids cannot possibly have more energy stored inside then it takes to initiate a chemical reaction to release? Explain then the energy stored in petroleum that is released by fire? The laws of thermodynamics still apply the universe used energy to make the petrol and the water it is absolutely possible to release stored energy through a chemical reaction.
rathtain 1 month ago
@rathtain You obviously failed your high school chemistry class. Water is the product of the reaction, 2(H2) + O2 ---> 2(H2O). Energy is released during this reaction. To go the opposite direction, 2(H2O) ---> 2(H2) + O2, you must put energy IN. To make the free hydrogen gas, you must ADD energy. If you do, the amount that you put in will be greater than you had originally gotten out, simply because there will be losses of energy due to heat, friction, electrical inefficiencies, etc.
yassensei 1 month ago 3
@rathtain OTOH, a combustion reaction such as (CH4) + 2(O2) --> (CO2) + 2(H2O) [burning methane] releases energy. While, indeed, the amount of energy released comes from the chemical bonds, if you wanted to reverse the process, it would take more energy than you get out. Simply, if you store 100 joules of energy, you would waste 20 or 30 joules (or more) simply running the machine which makes this reaction go. If this were not true, why haven't companies already done it?
yassensei 1 month ago
to there's this car that runs on water...it runs on water, man!
Hyde was right all along!
ictmeoy1988 1 month ago 2
Even with all the environmentalist stuff going round these days this still wont make it to mass market worldwide. Now why would that be.? Oh that's it, oil money is more important than saving the planet. Not that i believe it needs saving from us anyway.
InvisibleSovereign 1 month ago
This technology has been around for some time now, however, the politics of the USA will not allow it here. There are even mopeds/mini bikes from Japan that are fuel injected but are not allowed to be in the USA. They get out standing gas millage!!
grafixxs 1 month ago
haha fuel duty on water in the uk coming then
2010butchd 1 month ago 2
Completely bogus, don't be a fool.
IronmanPizza2008 1 month ago
@IronmanPizza2008 how is that bogus?
DeamonD 1 month ago
I would imagine the oil companies are working to nip this one in the bud, hard, if they haven't already.
urborg74 1 month ago 3
Is this project still running?
Matu1 1 month ago
There's always some idiot making negative comments about these technologies that are here to help humanity. They are either brainwashed, cool aid drinking fools, or they are actually working for the elitist.
pk525 1 month ago
@pk525 I don't drink cool aid, and I'm not sure whether I work for the elitists or not. I work fir the government in a country that's pretty rich in oil so probably yes.Is believing in the commonly accepted laws of physics being brainwashed? BTW, would I know if I were brainwashed? Probably not. Put me down for one and a half, or even two out of three. I'm pretty sure about the cool aid though.
Slameye 1 month ago
wait wait wait, didnt an american already discover this? im pretty sure i have a video on my laptop of when he did it!
dave872717 1 month ago
@disturbed1777 Your assuming that the water molecule is "cracked" by conventional hydrolysis. It's not. It's cracked by a radio wave designed to precisely hit the exact harmonic of the molecule. The electronic box that produces the radio wave takes only a small amount of power.
originalcause 1 month ago 2
@originalcause So you can get more energy out of H2 and O merging into water than you originally used for splitting them? That means we can get infinite amounts of energy from absolutely nowhere! And with infinite amounts of energy comes infinite amounts of matter as well. We can build an entire new planet from nothing and live there when there's not enough room left on Earth. WOWEE! Rewriting the first law of thermodynamics will have to be considered a minor problem.
Slameye 1 month ago
Umm... Anyone else going to call BS on this? Producing hydrogen from water requires more energy than you can extract from the resulting hydrogen. Even if the process was 100% efficient, you would only be able to extract as much power as you put in, and just have a cycle that produced 0 net power.
disturbed1777 1 month ago
This is not new! I wanted to develop this years ago but could get no support. :(
greensolarwind 1 month ago
So can you pee in it and make energy?
DavidMcbadbad 1 month ago 18
@DavidMcbadbad I don't see why not. They should add a pee-collection system to the seats and then you can drive forever! :D
ieahXIII 1 month ago
@ieahXIII Better keep some beer onboard then, so you don't run out of pee.
CorsairJock 1 month ago
@DavidMcbadbad
Possibly, but the more impure the water is that you use for fuel, the faster the system will need repair work.
RooFx 1 month ago
Also:
I'd prefer to drink the water then sacrifice it to my fucking car, thanks...
learrus 1 month ago
IT'S PRONOUCED "EE-KO" NOT FUCKING ECHO!!!
learrus 1 month ago
Oil companies will crush them.
peretis01 1 month ago
Hydrogen...Dioxide? HO2? Hydrodioxic Acid? -_-
smitty01209 1 month ago
Total bullshit, you should be ashamed of yourself.
condar419 1 month ago
Water contains hydrogen. Hydrogen can fuel an engine. Split off hydrogen and you have fuel to run a car. Oil co trolls, bugger off.
beerandbanjo 1 month ago
@beerandbanjo Minor problem - unless they've found a new miracle method of splitting off the Hydrogen, it takes more power to split water into Oxygen and Hydrogen than you get out of converting it back.
Fuel cells have been around for a long time. In general, yes, you can break water into H2 and O2. You can then recombine the H2 and O2 in a fuel cell to generate electricity. But it takes more to split than you get out so can't be done in a closed-circuit car.
See Wikipedia "Water splitting"
ehurtley 1 month ago
@ehurtley Would you prefer to pay for Gasoline? lol.. always one complainer in the crowd
WeSeeYouNWO 1 month ago
@WeSeeYouNWO Would I *PREFER* to pay for gasoline? Of course not. That's why I own a hybrid, and have a deposit in for an electric car.
But this isn't the answer. This is, at best, a massive misrepresentation of the technology, and at worst an outright fraud.
ehurtley 1 month ago
@ehurtley Wikipedia :D :D :D LOL
toyourdoors 1 month ago
Its nothing new though is it? this info has been around for decades only to be suppressed by the big finance houses that have culminated in the death of the inventors. It would be awesome for Japan if instead of applying for a patent they made the knowledge freely available to everybody. Just think how the world would view Japan then :D #luvnpeace guys
tink1888 1 month ago 2
What was it Barnum said? "theres another sucker born every minute" and they tend to meet on utube. (notice the moronic comments below)
Seems to be a lot of people concerned about free power, a the while completely unconcerned about there own lack of brainpower.
tampicokeed 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INVENTORS!!! You MUST go underground, do your own marketing, not to tie up with government. Don't patent your inventions. At least look for an investors and make your simple proven prototype and spread it. This is already proven scientifically by some scientist around the Globe. You MUST UNDERSTAND, this is a BIG THREAT for National Security for OIL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY. Can't get any supportt from them even you have a good intention doin this.
MrManilahomes 2 months ago
10 people who view this vid are from the Oil Company
171 people who view this vid are people like you and me
hotpapayasalad 2 months ago
two years later .. and nada so the title needs to be rewritten:
"Japanese to mass produce cars that run off water .. not any time soon!"
gr8vibes2 2 months ago
Yes, they save our planet!!! Oh sorry, they can't, it's a hoax! Please people learn physics!!!
74pbg 4 months ago
@74pbg Hey, maybe you dont realize where you are. Youre on utube, a kind of twilight zone where logic, rationality, truth, common sense, honesty, sanity, personal resposibility, and many of the higher traits and virtues of mankind cease to operate.
tampicokeed 2 months ago
Amazing that there are still people around who fall for these hoaxes.
henkvanderlaak 4 months ago
NICE CAR
masterdelrap 6 months ago
check the wikipedia entry on water powered cars
turgore 6 months ago
slim
MAZLOTV 7 months ago
Uhmmm 0:38 she says "Hydrogen Dioxide" I think she meant Dihydrogen Monoxide
LPNeptune 8 months ago
@LPNeptune Yeah, or Oxygen Dihydride...
ccdesan 5 months ago
good work. i will by one.
hrflikk 8 months ago
How come no one thinks of the more logical reason these things never get to market?. Like, they don't work.
LiamXaoh 9 months ago
i hope they build the car inspite of the u.s haarp system. this would be a severe blow to the globalist agenda and the so called elites.
truword64 9 months ago
The US will never allow this car in the country. Toyota makes a small truck that is a diesel that gets 70 MPG and the US will not allow it in the country.
frannbro 9 months ago
French tecnology, sold to TATA (India), but is not to be developed so soon as petrol lobby is very strong. , besides how will the various governments make their money .
Petrol and cars are real "" vaches à laits "
fmsad 9 months ago
French tecnology, sold to TATA (India), but is not to be developed so soon as petrol lobby is very strong. , besides how will the various goerments make their money .
petrol and cars are real "" vaches à laits "
fmsad 9 months ago
Is it any surprise that the powers that be tried to wipe the whole island off the map?
leptirgirl 9 months ago
it's 2011. Where is this car now?
vutEwa 9 months ago
THEY ALREADY MADE THEM CLOSE THEIR WEBSITE!!!! DAMN!!!
genepax.co.jp
Fuck you zionist imperialists!
easyrhinotuber 9 months ago
I want one. Or better yet, I would like the plans for the water conversion process.
roblh31 9 months ago
IN ADVANCE...
R I P
sim0b 9 months ago
they'll totally sink japan into the ocean before the production of this vehicle... dick cheney and the bush criminals cannot have their empire and cash flow threatened... that's the truth
MrBuckwilliam 10 months ago 30
@MrBuckwilliam Ain't that the truth.
vinbuddha22 1 month ago
Brown's Gas Machine ........
Technology Long Forbidden From Us by the elite as To Have It Would Give Us Freedom. Down With Satanism. Down With the Corrupted 'elites' and minorities who support this evil thrust upon the West. All within our militaries and and security industries who are not irredemably corrupted and have retained some diginity, nobility and integrity (against MK conditioning) must unite with the people and retake the land.
vortigern5 10 months ago 3
@vortigern5
Why do conspiracy theorists all over the world tend to capitalize their sentences more than the rest of us? Do you think Words Are Given More Impact because of this weird habit? They may i suggest CAPS LOCK FOR FULL EMPHASIS! IT BEATS THE WORDS INTO OUR BRAINS more effectively and makes us take you more seriously. Really.
Slameye 9 months ago
@Slameye because it's hard to get washed brains drenched in aspartame to smarten up and listen in the first place, hence the need for beating CAPS... just sayin'...
Pandabearkt 9 months ago
@Slameye Save your high brow judging for a future family guy script. Beatnick.
WeSeeYouNWO 1 month ago
1L for 80Km? That Hydrogen Dioxide has more energy per liter than TNT! Didn't they mean DiHydrogen Oxide (H2O)?
If you believe this I have a great bridge to sell ya.
vcepesh 10 months ago
yup this one will dissapear too they will kill him
hottboy19891 10 months ago
This isn't fake. If you do a bit of research you can read all about it. Also, when claims of this type have been fraudulent they are always asking for money from someone. Genepax is not asking for investors, simply a company willing to bring it into production. A man in his garage invented a blow torch that runs on water and he made a conversion for his car as well.
There are many alternatives to oil but our retarded society cant put profits on the back burner and do something productive.
The4LA2Baker0 10 months ago
Water = dihydrogen monoxide
The video said: hydrogen dioxide or commonly known as hydrogen peroxide, which is bleach.
This video is either fake or the writer of the news segment fucked up big time.
ChicaQueenOfWarGames 10 months ago
@adiostraitorobama OOH RAH!
kepplerh 10 months ago
@adiostraitorobama yeah especially when we are sitting on top of more than 2 billion barrels right now. its supposed to be under the rockies. dosent even include whats in out war reserve. sad really...those dune coons would rather see us all dead but they like our money too much.
GMCman82 11 months ago