Added: 4 years ago
From: kakammpi
Views: 5,374
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (374)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Narcissistic personality disorder=is a personality disorder described as being excessively preoccupied with issues of personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity.

    characterized by someone who has a grandiose sense of self-importance,believes that he or she is "special" and unique,has a sense of entitlement,lacks empathy,shows arrogant haughty behaviors or attitudes,is interpersonally exploitative,requires consistent attention.

    Woah,perfect match to someone I know here.

  • Anticipate ko nalang sa sunod na comment ni FRAUD123.

    "Fundamentalist Boomerang boom boom"

    Narcissistic statement

    "Boomerang boom boom"

    Hedonistic statement

    "Boomerang boom boom"

    Boomerang tactics suits you well because how you argue is like a boomerang,all non-stop spinning and going back and forth,(PAIKOT-IKOT), of facts and reality

  • @bostonredsox2188 Anticipate ko nalang sa sunod na comment ni FRAUD123.

    "Fundamentalist Boomerang boom boom"

    Narcissistic statement

    "Boomerang boom boom"....

    ===pikon ka na yata girl....ahahaha...ganun b ang mga satanist?

  • @friech123

    Pikon ka mo fraud123?

    Again,making claims w/o backing it up.

    Anticipation lang yan Fraud123,obviously predictable ka na kasi ehhh.

    Or maybe you're just pissed because huling-huli ko na ang stilo mo,or maybe everyday you're pissed because no one loves you,you have no friends,and you have no one who gives a damn about you.

    Yang EGO mo kasi ang best-friend mo ehhh,did I mention you're Narcissistic?

    Same tactic ulit next comment right fraud123????

  • Ther r basic differences of WORD DEFINITIONS & RELIGIOUS DOCTRINES FriechDOUCHE!!

    WORD DEFINITIONS r supposed to be taken literally,coz otherwise,DEFINING WORDS would b pointless.

    RELIGIOUS DOCTRINES on d other hand arent supposed to b taken literally,nor used to advance ones agenda,nor used to degrade & disrespect othr people,othrwise RELIGIOUS DOCTRINES wud b pointless.

    That's y RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM s & always wil b pointless,ur Hedonism crap s pointless,so everything u r is pointless!!!!

  • NARCISSISTIC: someone w/ the personality trait of egotism, vanity, conceit, or simple selfishness.

    FASCISTIC: someone who practices anti-individualistic, anti-democratic principles, considers ones view as being absolute.

    CLASSLESS: Boorish, implies rudeness of manner due to insensitiveness to others' feelings and personal worth.

    Hey Friechdouche!sounds like you aint it?

    Yeah I know,you'll turn this into some boomerang BS.

    THAT'S WHY ME,& THE WORLD SEES YOU & PEOPLE LIKE YOU,AS PEOPLE WHO SUCKS!

  • @bostonredsox2188 Hey Friechdouche!sounds like you aint it?

    Yeah I know,you'll turn this into some boomerang BS.

    THAT'S WHY ME,& THE WORLD SEES YOU & PEOPLE LIKE YOU,AS PEOPLE WHO SUCKS!

    ---again, i dnt care with you people who are satanists...anyways, that's ur choice...

  • @friech123

    So if you continue being a crazy delusional, egotistical, Narcissist then that's your choice.

    Welcome to the club Adolf Hitler and Osama Bin Ladin and their minions belong.

    Just get your self psychologically evaluated before you start killing people in the masses will you.

  • Let's enumerate some of the personal traits of this DOUCHE friech123,and lets add their definition.

    FUNDAMENTALIST : someone who strictly or rigidly adhere to specific theological doctrines.

    EXTREMIST: practices extremism,extremism is any ideology outside the perceived political center of a society.

    EGOTISTICAL: someone characterized as having an exaggerated estimate of one's intellect, ability, importance, appearance, wit, or other valued personal characteristics.

  • Comment removed

  • “It doesn’t matter whether we call them reproductive health programs, family planning programs, or population control programs. They all have the same effect: they force down the birth rate in countries that are already dying. Such programs are only making a bad problem worse.”

    ‘Europe is dying’ U.S. population expert tells Senate hearing....

  • . because there are no ignorant teenagers who don't know the consequences of having sex... because there are not enough people in this country who live by our natural rivers defecating on them day in and day out... because every family can feed their 6-12 children... So yeah listen to them EVERYTHING'S FINE!!!

  • The point sticks... those against the bill try to tell everyone else that we are fine... that we don't need this bill... because there are no women suffering... because the parents of the hungry children sniffing glue in the streets know how to manage their families..

  • @romancatholicgirl14 Teaching teens about values and morality is insufficient when it comes to love and sex. If they are not taught to avoid pregnancy by learning reproductive health in school instead of by themselves, teen pregnancies can't be avoided especially in poor areas due to their ignorance.

    Young boys exploring their sexuality who are not taught to use condoms are likely to get their girlfriends pregnant, putting their aspirations or ambitions at risk if they become young parents.

  • Boooooo...RH bill Boooo

  • Let's just summarize this all...

    So Friech called me liar bcoz of my "Condoms s 95% effective" statement,using The THAILAND AIDS STATS and that CONTRACEPTIVE MENTALITY THINGY to back it up.

    1st of all...That Thailand Aids stats didnt include how many of thm used condoms or didn't use condoms properly.

    2nd...CONTRACEPTIVE MENTALITY...is just some whack-job theory concocted by d ANTI-RH religious ideologues.

    So really,Am I really a liar for saying condoms r 95% effective,wen thats scientific fact?

  • @bostonredsox2188 "1st of all...That Thailand Aids stats didnt include how many of thm used condoms or didn't use condoms properly."

    IF majority of MEN are uneducated, the more it will happen to our country...another, majority of pinoys ARE STUBBORN not to USE condom, WHY, sabi nila "hindi nila nalalasap ang sarap"...so, will it be MORE Effective TOOL to combat AIDS..absolutely NOT...the more there will be AIDS victim, now, according to report, climbed up at 11%..how's that?

  • @friech123

    Prevalence in AIDS cases in Africa has significantly gone down since the UN starts aggressively gave out condoms despite objection from the Vatican.Hows that.

    If majority of men are uneducated,the more it will happen to our country.EXACTLY.That is why we have to educate them.

    ABCs in safe sex.A is for Abstinence,B is for Be Faithful,C is for Condom usage.Notice Condoms are in #3 not because its starts with C but because Abstinence & being faithful are SAFER.THAT IS WHAT THE RH TEACHES

  • @bostonredsox2188 2nd...CONTRACEPTIVE MENTALITY...is just some whack-job theory concocted by d ANTI-RH religious ideologues.

    where do u live? european and the americas have this kind of mentality already...you better ask them if you are ignorant...

    and 95% is 95%...you cannot call it as SAFE SEX!!!DO NOT GIVE FALSE HOPES TO PEOPLE!!!

  • Yeah,and I know what CONTRACEPTIVE MENTALITY is...

    and I and most people know that IT IS WAY WAY OVER-RATED.

    Condoms or no condoms,people are just simply getting more and more promiscuous,including Filipinos.

    Condoms are not supposed to be blamed for FILIPINO PROMISCUITY,I rather blame the CHURCH,their high influence in this country capable enough as far as INDOCTRINATION,didn't do shit to influence the behavior and the psyche of the Filipino people

  • @bostonredsox2188 Condoms are not supposed to be blamed for FILIPINO PROMISCUITY,I rather blame the CHURCH,their high influence in this country capable enough as far as INDOCTRINATION,didn't do shit to influence the behavior and the psyche of the Filipino people

    a scapegoat again...haha..kawawa naman sa mga katoliko, sila ang lagi sinisisi...

  • @friech123

    Scapegoat?more like telling the truth the way most people see it.

    We've done it the church's way for the past decades,and where are we now?

    I know you blame corruption for all this poverty problems.where's the church in that fight against corruption?where's the church in the fight against Poverty?

    When disaster strikes in this country?where?

    I'm not blaming the church here,ITS THAT I EXPECT MORE FROM THEM,especially that they call themselves SERVANTS OF GOD.

  • @bostonredsox2188

    correction on my church criticism I posted,I do blame the church...though not totally...C'mon lets get real...I just wont sugar-coat things.

    They don't pay taxes,although the tax code exempts them.they have been profiteering from the people with billions worth of business transactions tax free.Catholic schools don't pay taxes yet rates are expensive and not attainable to the masses.yet they contribute virtually nothing in society.tsk,tsk,tsk

  • BTW...Another lie about the RH bill is that sex-ed discourages ABSTINENCE.Not only is it not a lie,but also silly.

    Everyone knows the safest kind of safe sex is ABSTINENCE,duh...

    Abstinence is included in Sex-education,contrary to the ANTI-RH's belief.

    Freich...I would tell my 10 yr old daughter,its not wise to have sex at your age.

    Problem is,not many parents won't say anything about it to their kids,hence the results.INCREASING NUMBER OF CASES OF STDs AND UNWANTED PREGNANCY.

  • Another misconception and lie about the RH bill is that it encourages teens to have sex.

    First of all,Filipino teens are already having sex as early as 14,mostly having 4-5 different sex partners.keep in mind the bill doesn't exist yet,and despite the fact that THE PHIL CATHOLIC CHURCH IS HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL.

    The bill doesn't encourage sex,it encourages safe sex.Not even the INFLUENTIAL CATHOLIC CHURCH FAILED to stop this behavior.

  • @bostonredsox2188 and there is no such thing as safe sex.

  • @bostonredsox2188 i cant wait to see you telling your 10 year old daughter, "hey, if you go to party, be sure you have condoms, have safe sex!!!"

    haha

  • @friech123

    Right back at you...YOU LIAR.

    And you completely misunderstood that data.

    You're basically saying that condoms emit some kind of substance that drive people sexually insane.

    That data didn't go against condoms,that just shows the fact people are just getting more and more becoming sexually active,and reckless when doing so.

    If those Thailanders didn't use condoms,those cases would have doubled,same here in this country if that were the case.Wise up and analyze.Jeez

  • @bostonredsox2188 You're basically saying that condoms emit some kind of substance that drive people sexually insane."...

    tanga mo naman pala....it is the psyche of man that changes...walang alam ka yata sa psychology...

    btw, do u know what is contraceptive metality??

  • @bostonredsox2188 You're basically saying that condoms emit some kind of substance that drive people sexually insane....

    yah right....less people but a million AIDS cases....stupid!!!

  • @bostonredsox2188 You're basically saying that condoms emit some kind of substance that drive people sexually insane.

    That data didn't go against condoms,that just shows the fact people are just getting more and more becoming sexually active,and reckless when doing so.

    ----- who is deluded here..your 2 statements are cotradictig....so u admits that using it makes more people promiscuous.hence,,frequent contact means hi risk of AIDS...haha....

  • @friech123

    I really hate it when people put words on my mouth,I never said using condoms makes people promiscuous bcoz that is STUPID.w/ or w/o condoms,people are just simply getting more and more promiscuous,condom usage does not have anything to do w/ that,its just human behavior.

    BTW..did your study of those THAILAND AIDS CASES.did you include which of them used condoms and which did not?bcoz logic and science tell us that THEY PROBABLY ARE HAVING SEX W/ BARE UNPROTECTED ORGANS

  • @bostonredsox2188 "...usage does not have anything to do w/ that,its just human behavior."

    with this, you need psychology class..ANALOGY, if people drive crazy because of money, how can you say that there is no real connection b/n man's behaviour and condom?

    "THEY PROBABLY ARE HAVING SEX W/ BARE UNPROTECTED ORGANS"

    u use "PROBABLY", so, u'r guessing..that is a study made by doctors and sociologists...and it is logic and scientifically proven..

    another, Dr. Rowland said that..

  • @bostonredsox2188 another, Dr. Rowland said that..

    the PORES of condom is 50 times larger than that HIV particle...how then you REFUTE this FACT?

    denial again?

  • @friech123

    Point here you arrogant turd...is that condoms are 95% effective,that's scientific fact,despite of the pores,despite of its tendency to break or slip,I'm not denying its imperfection,95% effectiveness is SCIENTIFIC FACT and THEREFOR I AM NOT LYING.

    And to point out to you THE FACTS,condom usage isn't the only family planning method this bill informs and educate about.

    You keep missing the point,THAT IT'S ABOUT THE RIGHT OF EVERYONE TO BE GIVEN INFORMED UNCOERCED DECISION.

  • @romancatholicgirl14 correct...

    why they need sex ed?..it is all about MONEY...the early they enter into sex life, the more money they earn by buying condoms...that's why lagman is very eager to this kasi meron rin siyang porsiyento galing sa drug companies...

    another, only in this 20th centruy we are so eager to have sex ed..animals dont need that but they know how to do it...BAKIT KAYA itong mga pro RH are too eager na magkaroon ng sex ed, kailangan pa bang ituro na ang hayop nga alam?

  • By the way friech123,if you noticed I wasn't talking to you when I made that metaphor.

    I was talking to raffy222011.

    I agree with you that it would be wrong to compare condom usage,pregnancy to appendectomy,appendicitis and post-op infection,but I was comparing to how stupid it is to block a bill just for the reason it could be a new avenue for corruption.

    Befor making comments on my comments,make sure who I am referring it to.OKAY.

  • You Anti RH people are missing the point of wat d bill s about,its about the right of an individual to b nformed and educatd,all info including natural family planning methods,and reserve d ryt of an individual to choose and make a decision for themselves.

    That is wat the RH bill is about,INFORMATION DISSEMINATION, AND CHOICES MADE AVAILABLE.THAT'S A FACT

  • @bostonredsox2188 That is wat the RH bill is about,INFORMATION DISSEMINATION, AND CHOICES MADE AVAILABLE.THAT'S A FACT

    what information you disseminate???for sure it is all about FALSE information...that pills are not abortifacient and cannot cause cancer...IUDs and condoms are 100 percent safe...

    REMEMBER!!if you give choices to people...IT MUST be an INFORMED CHOICE!!! it means, your audience must now not just the positive side BUT also the NEGATIVE side effects like it can cause CANCER.

  • @bostonredsox2188

    REMEMBER!!if you give choices to people...IT MUST be an INFORMED CHOICE!!! it means, your audience must now not just the positive side BUT also the NEGATIVE side effects like it can cause CANCER.

    AND what is a FACT in the RH BILL?

    people will be PROHIBITED to talk about the NEGATIVE EFFECTS of CONTRACEPTIVES....THAT's a FACT!!!...SO, how it will be an informed choice when an ordinary poor couple have no access to NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECTS...is it what you call PRO-CHOICE?

  • @friech123

    OK...most of all,and most important of all.

    YOU ARE LYING!!!

    NEGATIVE SIDE EFFECTS OF PILLS AND CONTRACEPTIVES ARE NOT EXCLUDED IN THE INFORMATION DISSEMINATION THIS BILL ADVOCATES.

    Your statement that "people will be prohibited to talk about the NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF CONTRACEPTIVES".IS A TOTAL OUTRAGEOUS BASELESS LIE.

    and by the way using condoms is safe sex,95% success rate and 5% failure rate is different than 100% failure rate and 0% success rate.

  • @bostonredsox2188 and you forgot about the SEX EDUCATION. my point is, nahihirapan na nga ang mga batang pinoy na makapagsalit ng fluent english bec. of the poor educational system dito sa pinas, dadagdagan pa ng SEX ED?? we're not in the US. the phils. may have forgotten that we are not a 1st world country.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    Let me tell you about the current situation in this country.

    The number of teenage pregnancy is increasing and increasing each year,large number of them as young as 14 or 15.

    A large percentage of those pregnant teenagers either get their pregnancy aborted illegally, aborted spontaneously or worst,die due to pregnancy or childbirth related causes.

    so what would you choose?your religious ideology?or the welfare of your fellow Filipinas?

  • @bostonredsox2188 i dont think the RH bill would solve that. don't you think these teenagers already know about condoms,etc? plus, it's not like they're 6 years old who do not know the consequences of their actions.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    I gave you the numbers,and those numbers tell us that it contradicts your latest statement.

    Most teenagers get their information about condoms and safe sex from their peers and other dirty unreliable sources, few get that information from their parents.In general,Filipino teens are IGNORANT IN THIS MATTER.

    And that results to the increasing number of teenage pregnancy,leading to abortion and death.

    Again,choose,your ideology or the welfare of your fellow filipinas?

  • @bostonredsox2188 i DO NOT have to choose between the two.

    ignorant about this matter? where did you get that belief? these teenagers know about sex. they know that it could end up in pregnancy. they know what condoms are for. they know the consequences, but they still do it.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    ignorant about this matter?where did I get that belief?

    Increasing number of teenage pregnancies,decreasing age of teenage pregnancies,increasing number illegal abortion due to unplanned pregnancy,increasing number of teenage pregnancies leading to death.

    That's reality,that's pure fact,that's not belief.

    And FYI,using condoms is safe sex.95% success rate is better than 0%.

    Again,choose,your ideology or the welfare of your fellow filipinas???

  • @bostonredsox2188 And FYI,using condoms is safe sex.95% success rate is better than 0%.

    this is mis-information..and you LIAR!!!

    EXAMPLE

    1980s, the AIDS cases b/n phil and thailand are almost the same.

    Philippines were not aggressive then in using condom...thailand bcame aggresv coz of that policy (like RH)

    NOW, Philippines have less than 50,000 cases includes the unreported cases

    and with THAILAND, more than 1 million infections

    NOW, HOW YOU CALL IT SAFE?who is a liar here?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @bostonredsox2188 as i said, i am NOT choosing between the two. aight?

    those teenagers should be taught about DISCIPLINE. they should be taught about MORALS. and yes, they should be introduced to contraceptves (w/c is already being done on Health class in high school). as long as u have sex, there will always be a chance of u getting pregnant.

    and where did u get the 0% when abstinence gives a success rate of 100%?

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    and when did I ever say that 0% when abstinence gives a success rate of 100%,and what the hell does that mean.

    I agree,teens should be taught about DISCIPLINE,& they should also be taught about CAUTION.

    U know y Filipino teens have sex w/o care & caution?because they are not aware that getting teenage pregnancy s risky both 2 their lives & 2 ther unborn,dey dont know about STDs,misconceptions and myths about sex.THAT IS WHY THEY DON'T CARE,coz no one bothers to educate them.

  • @bostonredsox2188 ,giving people more access to condoms is tolerating them to sexual immorality and marital infidelity.Many people will be infected by AIDS,I hope you'll not be one of them contacted.Anyway,condoms cannot solve overpopulation or poverty.Poverty is the most alarming problem of the two but condoms is not the solution.You cannot eat condom.Food production is the solution.Give them food not condom.They cannot think well,they cannot plan their family well if they are hungry.

  • @bostonredsox2188

    this is what you said: And FYI,using condoms is safe sex.95% success rate is better than 0%.

    - - > what then were you referring to about the 0%?

    a lot filipino teenagers engage in sex because it seems to be ''what everyone is doing'' and they fall into the trap of peer pressure. parents should teach their teenage sons and daughters about sex and its consequences. it's a part of their job as parents.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    I think its that obvious,I referred that condom usage is 95% effective,so what is the opposite of using condoms?NOT USING CONDOMS w/o considering factors of menstrual cycle is 0% effective.GET THAT NOW?

    and just take a second to recognize reality,PARENTS ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOB,and proof to that is teenagers are having sex and getting pregnant early.Sorry I won't sugarcoat anything.

    u'r right,kids are having sex coz of peer pressure,and that NO ONE IS INFORMING THEM

  • @bostonredsox2188 yeah, i understand your point.

    so what are these parents waiting for? isn't it about time they talk about the birds and the bees?

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    I don't know what the parents are waiting for?

    So what now?you'll wait for parents to start talking to their children about this stuff which is probably never,or you'll let the government step in and do their job educating?

  • @bostonredsox2188 let them do their jobs or if not, let the teenagers use their common sense.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    But teenagers are not going using their common sense well because NO ONE IS TEACHING THEM!!!!THAT'S THE POINT.

  • @bostonredsox2188 are you tryna tell me that they do not know what the consequence of sex is?

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    You really have no idea do you?

    Do you know the different stupid myths that teens believe about sex?Do you know that they don't know how dangerous it is to themselves and their unborn be pregnant at an early age?Do you know that they don't know what STDs are?Do you know that they think condoms are useless?

    You have absolutely no Idea do you?maybe you should get sex education...I think you need it

  • @bostonredsox2188

    i DO have an idea. teenagers are to be taught about the values, morals and most especially DISCIPLINE. these things wouldn't happen if they  stick to the good ol' values. they wouldn't need a condom if they put the morals they know into actions.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    Oh OK...you do have an idea but you just don't seem to care...

    You are right...if they would stick to the "good ol' values" they would be fine.problem is...NO ONE IS TEACHING THEM ANYTHING!!!NO ONE IS BOTHERING,NOT THE PARENTS, AND NEITHER IS THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.

    YOU JUST DON'T GET IT....

  • @bostonredsox2188 ohh. long time no see! i missed you. lol

    i DO care. teeangers are being taught about morals. there are subjects for that.

    and we all know about the values, morals, character, dignity, etc.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    No sorry,I disagree,no offense but I DON'T THINK YOU CARE.

    Teenagers are being taught morals,values,character?You were taught obviously,BUT CAN YOU NOT FIGURE OUT THAT MOST ARE NOT?

    Teenage pregnancy,Abortions everywhere,fetuses thrown anywhere like garbage.YOUR WAY IS NOT WORKING.

    I think you just don't care because you keep on sticking to your ideology,yet you turn a blind eye on the REALITY AND TRUTH of what is happening to thousands of teenagers JUST LIKE YOU.

  • @bostonredsox2188 you only THINK i don't care and it doesn't mean that if you don't think i do, i really don't.. so no worries, there's no offense taken.

    what do you think does the RH Bill do to these? do you think it would encourage the teenagers to stick to their morals?

  • My God...Its either you are too naive and ignorant or you just simply don't care.

    You simply think that everything is fine,that there are no teenage pregnancies,abortions and STD infections amongst teens?

    The RH bill is more than about MORALS,Its about EDUCATION,DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION THAT CAN DETERMINE THE HEALTH,SAFETY AND WELFARE OF TEENAGERS LIKE YOU.

    If you continue to be an ideologue who thinks you live in a magical world where all people follow morals and values,then ur hopeless

  • @bostonredsox2188 think what you wanna think about whether or not i care, it doesn't matter.

    RH bill does educate but with it comes the DISADVANTAGES. a bill need NOT be passed to educate.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    "The RH bill does not educate"

    That is the most absurd BULLSHIT I have ever heard?

    What is EDUCATION for you?Is spreading and disseminating INFORMATION ,NOT EDUCATING?What the hell is wrong with you.Pls look at education in the dictionary.

    Just face it...YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FACTUAL AND LOGICAL TO DEFEND YOUR POINT OF VIEW.NONE...Just like all ANTI-RHs

    You noticed?when you respond to my comments,you're not really responding to my statements STRAIGHT FORWARD?

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    Ok then so you say the RH bill does aim to educate...

    You said "a bill need NOT be passed to educate"...so in this country where teenage pregnancy happens, illegal abortion happens, STDs happens, Large Maternal mortality rates happen, poor Families with more children than they can financially afford happens...

    So my apologies, I now realize we need not to pass the RH bill because every Filipino seems to be fine and well taught of the values...SORRY MADAM.

  • @bostonredsox2188 so does that mean that it's the end of our little debate in here?

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    I guess that seems so.

    Look,I respect your opinion,even though its not reality-based and largely based on ideology.

    So you think our country is in fine shape,OK.

    Teenage pregnancy,maternal mortality rates,neglected unprovided children,low standards of living seems to be OK for you.OK.

    For you,our country's policies have been going your way for decades,and changes would be unnecessary because things are fine.OK.

    You see a bright future in this country.OK.

    EVERYTHINGS OK!!

  • @bostonredsox2188 i respect your opinion too. and i'm sorry if i may have said hurtful things and such. peace be with you!

  • Comment removed

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    No you haven't said any hurtful things...

    which is such a shame since some people on your side of this debate don't have the same amount of CLASS as you.

    DI KAGAYA NG IBA DYAN...CLASSLESS na HYPOCRITE pa!!!

  • @bostonredsox2188 thank you and i hope it goes well between you and the other anti RH people. after all, we're all children of God.

  • @romancatholicgirl14

    I hope it goes well for you too.

    And you're right, we're all children of God...

    Ohh wait,according to a certain self-proclaimed "THE GREAT ONE" over here may think otherwise.Such a shame some people give you ANTI-RH people a bad name.

  • @bostonredsox2188 thank you! i hope you guys make peace soon. nothing's wrong with a little debate as long as there are no harsh words being said against each other. :/

  • @bostonredsox2188 Ohh wait,according to a certain self-proclaimed "THE GREAT ONE" over here may think otherwise.Such a shame some people give you ANTI-RH people a bad name.

    what about ur hero "CELDRAN"?n

  • @friech123Thing about Celdran and most ANTI-RH,is that they care about people.They rebel against the Catholic church to fight for something in w/c they believe will help.No matter how much u disagree w/ everything they stand,their intentions are noble, self-less and pure.

    So how about u?u don't care about other people besides yourself.All u care about is your pride and ego,w/ your "I'm always right and never wrong attitude".

    Makes you wonder,WHO REALLY IS SATAN'S LITTLE BITCH?

  • @bostonredsox2188 No matter how much u disagree w/ everything they stand,their intentions are noble, self-less and pure.

    r u sure???what about the lobby money in congress ranging from 1 million to 5 million?dare to ask your tongressman....

    and, BTW, majority of the women on your side are FEMINISTS...hence, its also a kind of fundamentalism...one, i know, being interviewed in ANC? a self confessed EXTREME FEMINIST..so, who is fundamentalist?everything boomerangs to you and what you stand...

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    So did those EXTREME FEMINIST said anything about "THOSE WHO ANTAGONIZES ME ARE DAMNED".

    Feminist care about women's rights,all you care about is YOU,YOUR EGO,YOUR PRIDE AND NO ONE ELSE BUT YOU.

    Thats what EXTREME FUNDAMENTALISM is all about.This ideal that causes people to throw away their values of RESPECT AND HUMILITY,and makes people ARROGANT NARCISSISTIC TOTALITARIAN NUTS.

    To answer ur question,who is fundamentalist?YOU STILL ARE,boomerangs straight up ur ass.

  • Comment removed

  • @bostonredsox2188 btw, are you Catholic? :)

  • Comment removed

  • @bostonredsox2188 okay, since you are Catholic, I just wanted to share with you this info in case you didn't know yet: we should confess first our mortal sins before taking Holy Communion and if we ever took communion in the state of mortal sin, this too should be confessed to the priest. :) God bless!

  • Comment removed

  • @bostonredsox2188 i'm glad you already know about that since not a lot of Catholics know about that. :/

  • @bostonredsox2188 Just face it...YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FACTUAL AND LOGICAL TO DEFEND YOUR POINT OF VIEW.NONE...Just like all ANTI-RHs"""

    same old statement...kung hindi na kaya ng mga pro RH ang argumento, they will resort to AD HOMINEM fallacy..pity, pathetic you IMBECILE!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    AD HOMINEM FALLACY?Before you use terms against other people,make sure that term doesn't apply to who you are.

    Everything u posted in every video u leave your shit behind,everything,I mean everything is AD HOMINEM FALLACY.

    Youre a biased,narrow,one-sided mind Ideologue.U r arrogant & classless.U use scare tactics,over-inflated issues,accusations,speculation­s,allegations,inconclusive stats & studies, & fundamentalist ideology to defend ur arguments.

    pity, pathetic u HYPOCRITE!

  • @bostonredsox2188 ganito lang ka simple ang sagot diyan...

    tuwing natatamaan ang isang tao sa katotohanan..ganyan ang mga sinasabi...

    HENCE, you are a satanist....ang mga salita mo parang nasa apoy ka na na hindi mapakali...

  • @friech123

    sure?natamaan?tama ka...natamaan ako ng HANGIN MO.

    I could just feel the breeze of the wind coming out of your head from here.

    Satanist?salita nasa apoy?and this coming from a guy who blurted out AD HOMINEM FALLACY.

    See what I mean about you being a hypocrite?you may think you're typing words but all it is for me is random incoherent blah blah blah mambo jambo crap that I just don't give a shit.

  • @friech123

    You wanna know the truth?you're a biased,narrow minded fundamentalist extremist w/ a fascist mentality.A hypocrite who don't even take a second to look at himself in the mirror.Hitler,Osama,Mao belong in the same category like you.

    Unlike you, I know for a fact that I'm in no place to judge you, that task is exclusive only to the big man upstairs. But I'm pretty darn sure there's a parking spot reserved for you downstairs, say hello to Mao,Osama and Adolf for me.

  • @bostonredsox2188 ang galing ninyo talaga mag twist ng truth....that's how cunning and sly the disciples of satan are...pity on you

    again..those PRO RH are simply following the favor of satan...

  • @friech123

    twisting the truth....

    So what is the truth then?That you were born here on Earth and given the task by the Good Lord himself as the STANDARD BEARER OF ALL THAT IS TRUTHFUL AND GOOD?and everyone is obliged to follow your standards?is that it?You think you're that special.

    You're just an arrogant delusional narcissist, and part of being delusional is not being aware of being delusional,and you're not that special as you think you are.

    That's the whole untwisted truth.

  • @bostonredsox2188 haha...now, ur true color unveils..."That you were born here on Earth and given the task by the Good Lord himself as the STANDARD BEARER OF ALL THAT IS TRUTHFUL AND GOOD?and everyone is obliged to follow your standards?is that it?You think you're that special."

    a secularist, existentialist idiot that denies the absolute truth and rather, everything are relative...what the world...what the fruit of satan...

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    OK, I didn't realize that we all live in a non-secular world where existentialism doesn't exist.

    So that means being A RADICAL,FUNDAMENTALIST TOTALITARIAN NUT is the way to get to heaven.

    Hey,do you know where you can find RADICAL,FUNDAMENTALIST TOTALITARIAN NUTS like you?In maximum security prisons,in Guantanamo bay,or hiding somewhere because they're on the most wanted list, and I know one that got shot in the head and is in the bottom of the ocean right now.

    Care to join them?

  • @bostonredsox2188 you dnt know what fundamentalist mean and what is right and wronng...yah right, u cant distinguish what is right from wrong coz of your existentialist, secularist stupidity...i cant wait to hear from you that a color black can also be white...stupid!!!

  • @friech123

    Fundamentalism is STRICT adherence to specific theological doctrines,take note of the word STRICT.

    Someone who refers theological doctrines as "absolute truth".The same principle that drives the worst WARLORDS and TERRORISTS all over history.

    Its better to be called a stupid existentialist secularist, than a "smart" fundamentalist.

    Because one,fundamentalist aren't smart to begin with,coz they are narrow,one-side minded indoctrinated douches.

    and two,you suck!like Osama and Hitler.

  • @bostonredsox2188 Someone who refers theological doctrines as "absolute truth".The same principle that drives the worst WARLORDS and TERRORISTS all over history.

    bingo..this how you are being deluded by satan..where the truth is being compromised, agreed, etc as long as it gives pleasure, etc...NOW you can say that a black can be white also...haha...

    osama?im not a muslim..hitler? not even a xtian...ah, you dnt beliv in my personal info, its useless to reiterate...LOL

  • @friech123

    You are neither a Muslim or a christian,but you,Hitler and Osama are driven by RADICAL FUNDAMENTALISM.All of you.

    Like it or not,you're a FUNDAMENTALIST.

    Face it, you're a non-muslim, non-christian version of Osama and Hitler.

    And save your Hedonism crap to someone who gives a damn.When you pull some Hedonist BS,I know that you think it means something,but its just random nut blabber.

    I know for a fact that black can't be white, same thing as you are not special as you think you are.

  • @bostonredsox2188 you condemn me being fundamentalist and you are not and, yet you say "I know for a fact that black can't be white"....haha...madami ka pang kakainin bigas bago ka maging magaling sa debate....alam mo ba ang tawaga diyan???DILEMMA..kawawa ka naman...na corner ka na naman....

  • @friech123

    Black can't be white,that's not fundamentalism that's just being factual.

    Black can't be white,even if you cover or paint something black w/ something white,its still black.

    Same thing as you,if you call think of pose yourself as the bearer of all truth,fact is you're not the bearer of truth.

    I'm Cornered,Damned,Stupid, NO MATTER how many DECLARATIONS YOU CAN MAKE,I DON'T GIVE A DAMN.

    because it comes from an arrogant,self-absorbed narcissistic delusional little bitch.

  • @bostonredsox2188 Black can't be white,that's not fundamentalism that's just being factual.

    what are the synonyms of fundamental?===principle, basis, norm, factual...FACTUAL!!!

    tangengot mo pala

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    Look at the word FUNDAMENTALISM in every dictionary you can find,most of them refers to FUNDAMENTALISM as RIGID adherence to religious principles.THAT IS YOU.The root word FUNDAMENTALS in the word FUNDAMENTALISM doesn't refer its general meaning,it refers specifically to religious fundamentals,principles,basis,­norm.So this has nothing to do w/ colors or whatever.

    Or are you that NARCISSISTIC you can make definitions of your own.

    Bet you'll call me a FUNDAMENTALIST for this statement.

  • @bostonredsox2188 u take a look at this comment of yours "...he root word FUNDAMENTALS in the word FUNDAMENTALISM doesn't refer its general meaning,it refers specifically to religious fundamentals,principles,basis,­norm.So this has nothing to do w/ colors or whatever...."

    isnt it you explained literally????and lteral interpretations are fundamentalism...haha..you again contradicts ur self...bro, better have a crash course in argumentation...lahat pointless sinasabi mo....

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    Correction, literal interpretations OF RELIGIOUS DOCTRINES is fundamentalism.

    I'm not the one literally interpreting RELIGIOUS DOCTINES,you are.

    I'm not contradicting myself,I am just simply being right, and you being simply wrong.So this bullshit technicality crap that you're blabbing about is pointless because simply IT IS SIMPLY DEAD WRONG!!!

    Better get a crash course in READING AND COMPREHENDING correct definition of terms.

    SO YOU'RE STILL THE FUNDAMENTALIST NUT,WHILE I AM NOT!!

  • @bostonredsox2188 ",I am just simply being right, and you being simply...

    SO YOU'RE STILL THE FUNDAMENTALIST NUT,WHILE I AM NOT!!.."

    Narcissist?...parehas na tau tsong...hahah...boomerang....b­oom boom boom...uyah...u have all the privilege to deny all u can that u r hedonist and satanist...but that's u already...u cant deny a nothing..so, it must first exist in u!!!haha

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    Oh c'mon,stop your stupid ass childish games,stop whining and move on.

    Perhaps you should read the entire comment that I made instead of conveniently use choice cut words and phrases to suit you.

    I didnt just said I was right and you were wrong,I gave an accurate explanation why I was right and you were wrong.

    Ano ulit and definition ng FUNDAMENTALISM?not according to u,according to its actual dictionary definition.

    Ironic of how u bitch bout twisting truth wen you're the one doin it.

  • @bostonredsox2188 Oh c'mon,stop your stupid ass childish games,stop whining and move on...

    ==tingnan mo kung gaano ka nagkakandarapa sa kaka explain...so who is childish.??boomerang again...boom boom.

    I didnt just said I was right and you were wrong,I gave an accurate explanation why I was right and you were wrong.

    ==isnt it a narcissistic attitude???boomerang.boom boom

    please satan.you will always be wrong..you'll never be right...a wrong will never be right (sound fundamentalism?)

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    Di mo ba alam kung ano ang Narcissistic?

    Hambog,mayabang,mahangin,arrog­ante,egocentric,self-absorbed.­Ikaw yan ehh.

    Di aq ngmamayabng tol,sinasabi ko lang ang totoo at pinatunayan ko sayo.

    Ikaw naman,pina-iral ang paniniwalang ikaw ang palaging tama at di mali at di mo na dapat na patunayan dahil NARCISSIST ka!di mo matanggap na mali ka dahil NARCISSIST ka!nalalait mo ang kapwa mo dahil NARCISSIST ka!

    "al hu contradicts me are satanist",sinabi mo yun dahil NARCISSIST KA.

    KUHA MO!

  • @friech123

    Narcissism s d prsonality trait of egotism simple selfishness,characterized by an exaggerated estimate of one's intellect,ability,mportance,wi­t,or other valued personal characteristics

    Analyze ka muna tol bago gumamit ng mga salitang di mo naman alam ang tunay na dfinition.

    Using Hedonistic crap to those who disagrees w/ you=Narcissist

    Denyng mstakes & errors=Narcissist

    Saying "u will always b wrong.u'll never be right"=Narcissist

    Saying "those hu contradicts me r Satanist"=Narcissist

  • @bostonredsox2188 Using Hedonistic crap to those who disagrees w/ you=Narcissist

    Denyng mstakes & errors=Narcissist

    Saying "u will always b wrong.u'll never be right"=Narcissist

    Saying "those hu contradicts me r Satanist"=Narcissist

    sariling meaning mo to girl???

    yah, u can accuse me of many things....but the truth still remains...YOU ARE SATANIST!!!deny all u can....but its an indelible mark u have done to urself....hell is waiting for you...satan is smiling at you...

  • Comment removed

  • @friech123

    Sorry FRAUD123,di ako takot at bale wala sa aking ang mga scare tactics ng isang NARCISSIST who thinks he is hand-picked by God himself to decide what should and what should not be the belief of every single one person in this world,who believes frankly that everyone who contradicts him are damned,and who believes he is the sole bearer of the standards of ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

    so better yet you should save your Hedonistic mambo jambo to those who worships you,which is most probably NONE!!!

  • @friech123

    Oh now Im A Narcissist now huh Narcissist?\

    So who said "anyone who antagonize me are demons" again?

    That response I made to your advices,that's not being Narcissistic,that's me saying I could care less about what you say because YOU SUCK,not the people on your side of the debate,JUST YOU,SINGLING YOU OUT,YOU SUCK!

    Your hedonist mambo jambo,your advices,your declarations,all simply means nothing to me.

    So you can take your imaginary boomerang and stick it up your Narcissistic ass.

  • @bostonredsox2188 look at you now...cool men...you are no longer rational..watch your words...you are losing ur sanity...

    and...again...another antic strategy of satan and of you....twisting the truth....pity....

  • Comment removed

  • @bostonredsox2188 a friendly advice...mag aral ka muna ng logic...at argumentation....okie?

    kasi you say something and yet you contradict what you said...haha...

  • @friech123

    first of all.friendly advice...Learn some HUMILITY AND RESPECT.

    second of all,if you think I should learn logic and argumentation, it means I don't need to learn logic and argumentation.

    third of all,if you think what I say contradicts what I said, it means what I say didn't contradict what I said.

    and fourth, you can take your friendly advice and your declarations and shove it straight up your ass.

  • Comment removed

  • Planned Parenthood, the largest Abortion and birth control provider in the US is being sued for their overpriced birth control pills. Imagine if the RH Bill is passed, what would happen to the 2Billion that is going to this sick project? this is now a new cash cow for corrupt politicians at the expenses of poor people!!

  • @Blavat666 BIGYAN KAYA KITA NG MAG ANAK NA SUNTOK SIPA AT TADYAK! di porke mahina ang utak mo pati kausap mo dito bobo at maniac na tulad mo! LAPASTANGAN!

  • @Blavat666 MAS GUNGONG KA! KASALANAN SA DIOS ANG ISINUSULONG NYONG MGA PRO! NATAKOT KAYO SA PAGDAMI NG TAO PERO OKEY LANG NA MAGKASALA! yUNG MGA BANSANG SUMUPORTA SA BILL NA YAN AY NASA LALONG LUBOS NA KAHIRAPAN NGAYON DAHIL SA PARUSA NG DIOS SA KANILA! KAYO NA LANG ANG BUMUKOD SA AMIN PARA DI KAYO MAHIRAPAN! WLA KAMING HINIHINGI SA INYO KAYA WAG NIN YONG IKATWIRAN NA NAHIHIRAPAN ANG BAYAN DAHIL SA POPULATION! MGA UTO-UTO NG MGA GANID NA PULITIKO! KADEMONYUHAN ANG NASA ILALIM NG BILL NA YAN!

  • The Catholic Church is not against family planning per se. She is against the immoral means or methods by which it is being implemented. And the end does not justify the means. Any family planning scheme that is premised on materialism and relativism is anti-God and anti-life. The prevention of conception through human intervention is a sin because it frustrates the will of God to create human life. God knows a person even before conception (cf. Jeremiah 1:5).

  • sa mga PRO RH

    ang tangang kasama ninyong si ESPERANZA CABRAL, dating DOH at pro RH, mismong nag admit sa HARAPAN ng ABS that "PILLS causes BREAST CANCER"

    sige, mga pro rh, uminom lang kayo ng pills para lahat kayo mag cacancer, para mabawasan naman dito sa pinas ng mga satanista..and that is the BEST population management...

  • @friech123

    Yeah,pills do put you at risk for breast cancer,we know that,we admit that and we are honest about it and we advocate to disseminate that information before handing out the pill to people.Unlike you,we don't lie,hide anything or throw bullshit at people who disagree with us.

    No one is forcing anyone to take pills,if an individual doesn't want to risk it,then don't take it.YOU DON'T GET THAT THIS BILL IS ABOUT NO LIE,NOTHING TO HIDE,NO BULLSHIT INFORMATION DISSEMINATION.THAT'S THAT

  • @bostonredsox2188 are you sure that all of you here dont hide this???

    browse some of the comments and you instantly see that PRO RH deny these...

    what about condoms that have pores 50X larger than the HIV particle...would you affirm or deny???

    would you call it as safe sex???

  • @bostonredsox2188 Unlike you,we don't lie,hide anything or throw bullshit at people who disagree with us.

    and wgho hides here??? who lied??? even your boss CELDRAN denied that these doesnt cause cancer...

    illogical reasonings..haha

  • @friech123

    and is your response of logical reasoning?

    what celdran denied is that your risk of getting cancer with pills is that big like DAMASOist lie over and over again.The pill causes cancer,we know that.This issue of "pills causing cancer" is way way exaggerated.You are more likely to be hit by lightning than getting cancer when taking pills.

    You are reasoning with half truths and whole lies.

  • FUCK THIS ROMAN CATHOLIC GUYs IN THIS COUNTRY

    FUCKIN Lier's.

    I FUCKIN HOPE THEY GET THEIR ASSes QUICSCOPED BY A BARRET .50 CAL

  • @Nev4rForgotten FUCK YOU TOO!!!

    you better get ur 50 cal and shoot yourself u hopeless...

  • @friech123 FUCK YOU.

    get a life nub

  • @Nev4rForgotten u better commit suicide u dumb asshole

  • Being knowledgeable about sex doesn't imply that you will engage in that act. Many engage in sex because they actually don't have enough knowledge about that matter. This results to PMS, STD, HIV, etc. In terms of abortion is concern, abortion will never occur if there is no baby that was formed. There is abortion because people wants to escape in that situation. If that situation was foretell by a person, he or she will surely not engage in sex in the first place.

  • @natarts892000 Being knowledgeable about sex doesn't imply that you will engage in that act.

    do you know the country USA? what happened to their youth when they indulged in sex ed? THE MORE THEY BECOME PROMISCUOUS...many researches are saying that sex ed promotes more teen age pregnancy in US alone...

    ang TATANGA NINYO...

  • @friech123 we are not americans. Our culture is more conservative compared to them so compariing to them is nonsense.