What pisses me off about all of this is that algae is thousands of times more efficient then corn to make biofuel out of and 20-30 times more efficient then palm (not mention its not a food and can be grown anywhere). Yet the bush administration caved to pressure from farmer associations to make corn the crop of choice. Stupid stupid stupid...
if i just posted ten or twenty comments, i do apologize...they dont seem to be getting posted so I've tried repeatedly. apologies if this is the case.
Jean Ziegler, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, who has called on governments to temporarily stop the drive for biofuel production. The sociology professor at the University of Geneva and the University of Sorbonne branded the production of biofuels a "crime against humanity" at a time when land, produce and investments are being diverted from food production despite widespread hunger in some parts of the world.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released a scathing report Sept. 11 calling for a dramatic drawdown in the subsidies and preferential trade laws granted to biofuel producers in OECD countries. In Europe, Friends of the Earth hailed the report, saying it has focused attention on the negative issues surrounding biofuels, while libertarian groups applauded its call for a reduction in subsidies.
the ecology system is struggling... human is doing the damage. i'm not so sure how far the 'heart of borneo declaration' meant to protect one of the last pieces of nature will succeed... will this suggest they can do anything outside the protected area? curious.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I think people are more important than orang-utans. The alternative to new palm oil plantations for bio-fuel is bio-fuel from food crops currently being eaten by humans. Enough of your heartless neo-colonialism!
Isn't the EU going to impose ethical ratings on biofuels from beyond its shores? You can read more about the enviromental impacts of biofuels at the Big Biofuels Blog. (shameless self promotion)
If you read many of greflcn's comments on many biodiesel videos here, you'd understand. Also, his URLs are all being re-routed to another URL, so he can change the web pages that they bring up, at any time.
not even waste biomass, like old cooking oil? but then there's not enough to support our insatiable appetite for fuel, which is why we say biofuels are a part of an energy solution, but only a small one. once they become industrially-produced, then they become a problem.
For the US it would only meet about 0.7% of current demand.
gristmill. grist. org/ story/2007/8/9/161921/0550
Thats a rather faustian bargain to trade a less than 1% solution (Which is only a tiny percent of total emissions), for increasing deforestation, which is over 20% of the global problem.
What pisses me off about all of this is that algae is thousands of times more efficient then corn to make biofuel out of and 20-30 times more efficient then palm (not mention its not a food and can be grown anywhere). Yet the bush administration caved to pressure from farmer associations to make corn the crop of choice. Stupid stupid stupid...
cnove138 3 years ago 2
if i just posted ten or twenty comments, i do apologize...they dont seem to be getting posted so I've tried repeatedly. apologies if this is the case.
Theshield33 4 years ago
hey cutting down a rainforest to grow bio fuel is prevents global warming...according to dumbass bureaucrats
beastinblack 4 years ago
Jean Ziegler, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, who has called on governments to temporarily stop the drive for biofuel production. The sociology professor at the University of Geneva and the University of Sorbonne branded the production of biofuels a "crime against humanity" at a time when land, produce and investments are being diverted from food production despite widespread hunger in some parts of the world.
communitywork 4 years ago
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released a scathing report Sept. 11 calling for a dramatic drawdown in the subsidies and preferential trade laws granted to biofuel producers in OECD countries. In Europe, Friends of the Earth hailed the report, saying it has focused attention on the negative issues surrounding biofuels, while libertarian groups applauded its call for a reduction in subsidies.
communitywork 4 years ago
the ecology system is struggling... human is doing the damage. i'm not so sure how far the 'heart of borneo declaration' meant to protect one of the last pieces of nature will succeed... will this suggest they can do anything outside the protected area? curious.
nrnst 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think people are more important than orang-utans. The alternative to new palm oil plantations for bio-fuel is bio-fuel from food crops currently being eaten by humans. Enough of your heartless neo-colonialism!
utkonos313 4 years ago
Isn't the EU going to impose ethical ratings on biofuels from beyond its shores? You can read more about the enviromental impacts of biofuels at the Big Biofuels Blog. (shameless self promotion)
Biofuelsimon 4 years ago
I'm very glad to see GreenPeace taking a balanced view.
The Biofuel industry must be managed well if we are to avoid downsides like this - it's not as harmless as some label it.
roidroid 4 years ago
Oh, yes, they are going to mulch up rain forrests for our cars...
seriously...
disjuku 4 years ago
OMG! I have tears in my eyes!!
Dickens123 4 years ago
ignore the youtube poster greyflcn - he spams every biodiesel video with his cynical disinformation and spam.
SeattleGuy1968 4 years ago
The irony being,
This video is about Malaysian Palm Oil.
Seattle gets a large portion of it's biodiesel from Malaysian Palm Oil.
greyfalcon. net/ palmoil
Soy? That'd be tearing down the Amazon rainforrest. Plenty of biodiversity there.
greyfalcon. net/ soy
Hell even corn is causing more soy to be planted in the Amazon. (And the biodiverse cerrados)
greyfalcon. net/ soy2
And the enforcement against deforrestation in the Amazon is practically nill.
greyfalcon. net/ soy3
greyflcn 4 years ago
Speaking of GreenPeace
greenpeace. org/ international/ press/ reports/ eating-up-the-amazon
I guess they are spamming "cynical disinformation" too.
So sorry to crush your happy thoughts with stark reality.
greyflcn 4 years ago
greyflcn, you forgot to add one of your spam URLs to this post...
SeattleGuy1968 4 years ago
Spam URLs aside, I think we're all saying the same thing, aren't we? I don't know enough about algae so can't comment there though.
GreenpeaceUK 4 years ago
Greenpeace,
If you read many of greflcn's comments on many biodiesel videos here, you'd understand. Also, his URLs are all being re-routed to another URL, so he can change the web pages that they bring up, at any time.
SeattleGuy1968 4 years ago
YES to Biodiesel from ALGAE!
Keep up the great work, Greenpeace UK!
SeattleGuy1968 4 years ago
not even waste biomass, like old cooking oil? but then there's not enough to support our insatiable appetite for fuel, which is why we say biofuels are a part of an energy solution, but only a small one. once they become industrially-produced, then they become a problem.
GreenpeaceUK 4 years ago
==like old cooking oil but only a small one.==
Yeah, by small you mean "Much less than 1%"
For the US it would only meet about 0.7% of current demand.
gristmill. grist. org/ story/2007/8/9/161921/0550
Thats a rather faustian bargain to trade a less than 1% solution (Which is only a tiny percent of total emissions), for increasing deforestation, which is over 20% of the global problem.
More than all of China's emissions combined.
greyflcn 4 years ago