I'm really impressed with this entire series in general; by providing a strong foundation about the basics (symbols, units, and detailed descriptions of relationships/distinctions between similar concepts), and then continuing to apply this basic knowledge to a variety of scenarios in a precise and methodological way, you've created a concise, logical and systematic approach to understanding the material and solving problems. Mad respect bro
@wretcherwretch then why do a lot of scientist ignore the fact that energy is transfered/transformed and eternal, from a source, when talking about "the big bang theory"... they say "it came from nothing and became something" know what i mean? Even Richard Dawkins says "no one really knows how the big bang theory happened".
You just contradicted yourself. "Nothing became something" or "No one knows".
HUGE difference. Scientists say the latter, creationists and other ignoramuses say the former. Scientists don't "ignore the fact" of anything, they simply understand the logic behind all of those facts better than you do, and you're not bothering to think about it.
@wretcherwretch I like science, i like to know how things work and why. But there still is know logical explanation or proof of "the big bang" theory happening because the 1st law of thermodynamics goes against it...
@wretcherwretch Kinda weird how humans have to make everything facts and need an explenation, when u take a step back and think about it. Things just are. Im the same and im not talking against u, just a thought. Its pretty strange...
@wretcherwretch Exactly. I do love sience but its funny when u look at it how we break down every single thing that excists and make it figures and math.
Well, the figures and math are a language we superimpose upon our surroundings. Remember that they don't exist a priori, or in and of themselves. We created the languages of math and logic as standards by which to evaluate what would otherwise be completely incomprehensible surroundings. That's why scientists are empiricists; depart from these standards, and you can state anything, but your claims will all be baseless.
If you make the video using the resource of the school or institution....then it is ultimately problematic. Competition creates innovation that is constantly surpassing us. That is the problem.
@TutorSAT what a hater you are tutorSAT ! BTW I saw your videos and they suck so bad no wonder you get no views! And you are using illegal resources so your videos will be pulled u ugly fatso. Tutor SAT (or should I say self proclaimed loser king of physics) get a life. Freelanceteach RULES !!!
If we use the internal energy of the heat supplied will be transformed to work, but not 100% clear by the 2nd law of thermodynamics does not allow it, such that the Carnot thermal efficiency is 50%
Now
ΔU = ΔQ - ΔW
The total heat supplied is equal to what lies within less than is spent at work, osea internal heat is being turned into work.
Heat = Energy
Energy is not created or destroyed only transformed.
The difference between the way you teach and the way my Physics professor teaches is that you actually EXPLAIN things....novel approach! I wish he'd try that. Thank you so much for sharing this. I can actually understand everything. It is helping me so much this semester! Wish I'd known about this site last semester.
very nice vids, keep up the good work
Muscarian66 1 month ago
AMAZING VIDEOS SAW EVERY SINGLE ONE!
rocker247chick 1 month ago in playlist Physics: First Law of Thermodynamics
Francesco Di Cosmo sent me here :P
dexismynickname 3 months ago 2
@dexismynickname me too!
stugill92 3 months ago
@dexismynickname SAME XD
calumwright12345 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he keeps repeating
Shockszzbyyous 6 months ago
I'm really impressed with this entire series in general; by providing a strong foundation about the basics (symbols, units, and detailed descriptions of relationships/distinctions between similar concepts), and then continuing to apply this basic knowledge to a variety of scenarios in a precise and methodological way, you've created a concise, logical and systematic approach to understanding the material and solving problems. Mad respect bro
chupacabra 7 months ago in playlist Physics: First Law of Thermodynamics 2
you are going to make me ace my final.. which is hard at the u of illinois
jdharde2 10 months ago 2
Nice vid:) When do you lean this in USA? I'm from Poland and i learned that in 8th class.
adamigoswpl 10 months ago 2
Comment removed
Slainiae 3 months ago in playlist Physics: First Law of Thermodynamics
Comment removed
adamigoswpl 3 months ago
Comment removed
Slainiae 3 months ago in playlist Physics: First Law of Thermodynamics
very bad.... VERY BAD. not even close.. this way you present the 1st law is like 6 years old
aijivl 11 months ago
have used at least 5 of your playlists this quarter to study for physics, really appreciate your time and will donate when i get the chance. thanks!
thai5102 1 year ago 14
he repeats himself like 50 times
whatitduz23 1 year ago
love it!!:)
psakshayacomes 1 year ago
nerD convo ... love it :D
Gowtham0008 1 year ago
Comment removed
Gowtham0008 1 year ago
Do all scientists belive in this law??? Eternal energy never created or destroyed. only transfered...
jesterman0488 1 year ago
@jesterman0488
Laws aren't "believed", they're facts.
wretcherwretch 1 year ago
@wretcherwretch then why do a lot of scientist ignore the fact that energy is transfered/transformed and eternal, from a source, when talking about "the big bang theory"... they say "it came from nothing and became something" know what i mean? Even Richard Dawkins says "no one really knows how the big bang theory happened".
jesterman0488 1 year ago
@jesterman0488
You just contradicted yourself. "Nothing became something" or "No one knows".
HUGE difference. Scientists say the latter, creationists and other ignoramuses say the former. Scientists don't "ignore the fact" of anything, they simply understand the logic behind all of those facts better than you do, and you're not bothering to think about it.
wretcherwretch 1 year ago
@wretcherwretch I like science, i like to know how things work and why. But there still is know logical explanation or proof of "the big bang" theory happening because the 1st law of thermodynamics goes against it...
jesterman0488 1 year ago
@jesterman0488
No, that's wrong, again. I already told you that the big bang does not claim to produce something from nothing. Read what I said again.
wretcherwretch 1 year ago
@wretcherwretch Kinda weird how humans have to make everything facts and need an explenation, when u take a step back and think about it. Things just are. Im the same and im not talking against u, just a thought. Its pretty strange...
MurdocLC 1 year ago
@MurdocLC
Indeed, we do have an internal drive to explain things. It's why we invented things like Zeus to explain lightning. : )
wretcherwretch 1 year ago
@wretcherwretch Exactly. I do love sience but its funny when u look at it how we break down every single thing that excists and make it figures and math.
MurdocLC 1 year ago
@MurdocLC
Well, the figures and math are a language we superimpose upon our surroundings. Remember that they don't exist a priori, or in and of themselves. We created the languages of math and logic as standards by which to evaluate what would otherwise be completely incomprehensible surroundings. That's why scientists are empiricists; depart from these standards, and you can state anything, but your claims will all be baseless.
wretcherwretch 1 year ago
what a cunt lol
KeyaBrown 1 year ago
If you make the video using the resource of the school or institution....then it is ultimately problematic. Competition creates innovation that is constantly surpassing us. That is the problem.
TutorSAT 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These videos are made with illegal resources....and will be pulled.
TutorSAT 1 year ago
@TutorSAT what a hater you are tutorSAT ! BTW I saw your videos and they suck so bad no wonder you get no views! And you are using illegal resources so your videos will be pulled u ugly fatso. Tutor SAT (or should I say self proclaimed loser king of physics) get a life. Freelanceteach RULES !!!
SunnyPhillyRuleZ 1 year ago
If we use the internal energy of the heat supplied will be transformed to work, but not 100% clear by the 2nd law of thermodynamics does not allow it, such that the Carnot thermal efficiency is 50%
Now
ΔU = ΔQ - ΔW
The total heat supplied is equal to what lies within less than is spent at work, osea internal heat is being turned into work.
Heat = Energy
Energy is not created or destroyed only transformed.
UnFisicoMatematico 2 years ago
master
ΔU = ΔQ - ΔW ----> correctly in the first law of thermodynamics.
Since some heat abosorve system and the total storage would be
ΔU = ΔQ -> With no work.
UnFisicoMatematico 2 years ago
@UnFisicoMatematico
the correct formula for the first law is ΔU=q+w! ΔQ is not the correct way to write heat.just heat=q and work=w.
there was an explanation for that in Atkins' physical chemistry...
raketapjotr 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WIth respect to the presenter.
How can you "teach" a subject you are reading from a book while you instruct? What level of qualification does that imply to the student?
Why did you leave the very distracting (and visually obstructive) pull-cord blocking your board?
Even at a High School Level, our instruction should strive for a higher level of quality.
JC
Associate Professor of Engineering
Past Course Director for Thermodynamics
aviator1978mj 2 years ago
i think he is relating the material in a way that the student he is tutoring was taught by their physics teacher, so as not to confuse them.
choppamx 2 years ago
the vedio was really very helpful...........very clear n understandable!!!
25zoyakhan 2 years ago
The difference between the way you teach and the way my Physics professor teaches is that you actually EXPLAIN things....novel approach! I wish he'd try that. Thank you so much for sharing this. I can actually understand everything. It is helping me so much this semester! Wish I'd known about this site last semester.
MarinaCoa 2 years ago
wow, very clear and concise, and exactly what i was looking for
Stonedbrownguy 2 years ago
i wish u were my teacher
HappyNapolean 2 years ago 9
good. the textbook i use refers to delta U as delta H.
fLowKnows 2 years ago
Awesome video! REALLY cleared some things up for me in Chemistry. Thank you!
Liendeni 2 years ago