That puck clearly crosses the line. Look how high it hits on Rask's glove before it bounces down and back across the line. But if the refs didn't have this particular look, I can understand them not reversing the no-goal call on the ice. Why wouldn't they have this particular look though? Flyers still won: greatest comeback in NHL history. Boston: greatest choke job.
it was flat on his pad! and his pad was clearly. CLEARLY, behind the goal line! that was the true winning goal! there was another replay at the time, and the puck was on his pads like a pizza on a table and he was completely in the net at the time!
who wonn
monrealrulz 1 month ago
That puck clearly crosses the line. Look how high it hits on Rask's glove before it bounces down and back across the line. But if the refs didn't have this particular look, I can understand them not reversing the no-goal call on the ice. Why wouldn't they have this particular look though? Flyers still won: greatest comeback in NHL history. Boston: greatest choke job.
braininahat 2 months ago
Don't forget this is at an angle, so the puck seems to be further behind the line then it actually is.
navymmw 1 year ago
it was flat on his pad! and his pad was clearly. CLEARLY, behind the goal line! that was the true winning goal! there was another replay at the time, and the puck was on his pads like a pizza on a table and he was completely in the net at the time!
tslabjr7 1 year ago
that's a good goal the refs a dumb these days
ghrbman96 1 year ago