eEpecially since the flight data showed that the airgraft behaved like military craft. Lots of pilots said the jets couldnt have performed as they did had they been standard civilian aircraft. Whats wrong? The fight data? Or dozens of civilian and military pilots?
All I know is a govt wouldnt destroy their own bldgs for a couple billion or for some short term failed wars to be justified. Beyond that, what happened is not how the goct said it happened. Somebody did something to those bldgs and it wasnt some half trained terrorists who were found alive anyways days later.
Maybe there was sumthing else eerie to it but to be quite honest i dont think a government agreed to kill 3000 ppl just so they could invade afghanistan. Afghanistan doesnt even have that much oil. Everyone seems to get mixed up between afghanistan and iraq.
you are a complete tool my freind !! jet fuel will not burn for weeks on after , to cuase molten steel . and most of it was consumed in the explosion . why were no forensics allowed on the site to examine anything? and all the steel was then shipped away , without ever beeig examined.
Thermite was not used. Quit the conspiracy talk, plane filled with jet fuel, conbustible material throughout the building, possibly natural gas ect. It was a tragedy, please let it go. Also, it is not uncommon for large fires to be hot several weeks later, due to the heat being insulated
NIST has not let it go. They still have not ruled out controlled demolition for building 7. Look on their website for yourself. Please just don't except the governments word. There was a reason the administration fought hard against an investigation. Please think.
Demolition crews worked at ground zero in the clean up for months. Not one crew member found any shred of evidence linked to a controlled demo. I'd say it's ruled out. BYW there WAS an investigation. Nobody stopped an investigation.
It's a tragedy yea, and the people truly responsible for it should be brought to justice. This shouldn't be just another action in controlling the population.
I have a BBC vid that this is taken from.This same man confirms a series of explosions as the towers collapsed.He was suprised at that funnily enough.Perhaps that should have been a clue to you that you should surprised too?
Notice how the firefighter, an expert on fire and burning stuff, isn't surprised by this revelation? Perhaps that should have been a clue to you that you shouldn't be surprised either.
Nothing should have gotten that hot and if you watch other videos you would see how strongly people denied that there was not anything redhot or molten steel. This is because jet fuel can never melt steel, so it means there was something else.
eEpecially since the flight data showed that the airgraft behaved like military craft. Lots of pilots said the jets couldnt have performed as they did had they been standard civilian aircraft. Whats wrong? The fight data? Or dozens of civilian and military pilots?
shkotay 4 years ago
lies
Zickefoose 4 years ago
two words, remote control
tube2a 2 years ago
All I know is a govt wouldnt destroy their own bldgs for a couple billion or for some short term failed wars to be justified. Beyond that, what happened is not how the goct said it happened. Somebody did something to those bldgs and it wasnt some half trained terrorists who were found alive anyways days later.
shkotay 4 years ago
Maybe there was sumthing else eerie to it but to be quite honest i dont think a government agreed to kill 3000 ppl just so they could invade afghanistan. Afghanistan doesnt even have that much oil. Everyone seems to get mixed up between afghanistan and iraq.
culabula92 4 years ago
you are a complete tool my freind !! jet fuel will not burn for weeks on after , to cuase molten steel . and most of it was consumed in the explosion . why were no forensics allowed on the site to examine anything? and all the steel was then shipped away , without ever beeig examined.
grkgod36 4 years ago
Thermite was not used. Quit the conspiracy talk, plane filled with jet fuel, conbustible material throughout the building, possibly natural gas ect. It was a tragedy, please let it go. Also, it is not uncommon for large fires to be hot several weeks later, due to the heat being insulated
Cooper2112 5 years ago
NIST has not let it go. They still have not ruled out controlled demolition for building 7. Look on their website for yourself. Please just don't except the governments word. There was a reason the administration fought hard against an investigation. Please think.
itchyandscratchy 5 years ago 2
Demolition crews worked at ground zero in the clean up for months. Not one crew member found any shred of evidence linked to a controlled demo. I'd say it's ruled out. BYW there WAS an investigation. Nobody stopped an investigation.
Kyles45Angel 4 years ago
It's a tragedy yea, and the people truly responsible for it should be brought to justice. This shouldn't be just another action in controlling the population.
timg455 4 years ago
HOW IT COULD HAPPEND a steel is melted in jet oil and be hot one week after?
coorvahmuch 5 years ago
I have a BBC vid that this is taken from.This same man confirms a series of explosions as the towers collapsed.He was suprised at that funnily enough.Perhaps that should have been a clue to you that you should surprised too?
stratocaster539 5 years ago
no.i think he is desensitised by experience.Unlike through fear and ignorance.
stratocaster539 5 years ago
Notice how the firefighter, an expert on fire and burning stuff, isn't surprised by this revelation? Perhaps that should have been a clue to you that you shouldn't be surprised either.
FWPB 5 years ago
Nothing should have gotten that hot and if you watch other videos you would see how strongly people denied that there was not anything redhot or molten steel. This is because jet fuel can never melt steel, so it means there was something else.
timg455 4 years ago
I think he sounds surprised.
23456D 4 years ago