Added: 3 years ago
From: thehunterword
Views: 2,940
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Form a line to stop the horses xD That is one epic fail. When police horses push, you DON'T have the slightest chance of resisting that. If you try you're a dumb asshole and you deserve some pain.

  • real tough guy cops

  • Remember not to blame the horses!

  • i dig them boots!! i might get some for my horses!

  • acab - all criminals are bastards

  • when police say u cant go any further, they mean it u tards

  • A veteran though?

    Democrat or Republican that's just fucked up.

  • Um, we're already at war in Afghanistan. It's only republican presidents who have gone to war in the last 50 years, if I'm not mistaken. Having a democratic president will be a relief.

  • Yes, but sadly, the stance will be much more aggressive, I guess my point is that there is no anti-war candidate. Sure a democrat will be a "relief" but only that, a relief because it is merely the lesser of two evils.

  • Unfortunately, war has become incredibly lucrative over the past eight years. Our leaders remind me of two-year-olds with temper tantrums and no discipline. But the lesser of two evils in this election could mean the difference between invading Iran or not.

  • The last 100 Years: WWI - Wilson = Democrat WW2 - Roosevelt = Democrat Korea - Trueman = Democrat Vietnam - Kennedy/Johnson = Democrat Grenada - Reagan = Republican Panama - Bush = Republican Desert Storm - Bush = Republican Serbia - Clinton = Democrat Afghanistan - Bush2 = Republican Iraq - Bush2 = Republican Actually it is Democrats who have gotten us in the bloodiest of our wars. So a Democrat is no relief. Both parties are in bed with Military Industrial Complex. We loose with McBama
  • You're right about the MIB. In my opinion, of the military engagements you listed, I can only see two that were made in our "defense" or otherwise, absolutely necessary - WWI and WWII. All of the others were "discretionary."

    You're also right about McBama, but there aren't enough of us with the jewels to vote third party...tragic.

  • @Levitica Eisenhower (R) was responsible for Vietnam, not Kennedy/Johnson. And you left out the Spanish American war under William McKinley, a republican, not to mention the civil war under Lincoln. Lincoln's term also saw the greatest annual percentage increase in the national debt from 90 million in 1861 to 524 million in 1862.

  • @mrbhave yeah Lyndon Johnson didnt escalate Vietnam by the tens of thousand, last time I checked he was a Democrat...Hows that relief treating you with Obama our new sock puppet?

  • @spineadjuster13 Oh, quite right. And don't forget about Clinton's extrajudicial intervention in Kosovo. The two-party duality is a ruse; a distraction. These guys all work for the same banking cartels. That much is clear.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more