Added: 3 years ago
From: merovinq911
Views: 157,572
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (886)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • C4

    THATS THE ANSWER

  • That prick on the street, shown at 3:13, was the most ludicrously obvious plant, to the point of being laughable.

  • - It was impossible to the tours to fall that way, unless there were detonators inside putted in technical places to make that happen. So don't come in with bullshit. RIP all 9/11 victims.

  • Of course the fire is going to cause something on the tower!!! why so much talk?

  • i really dont think the government was in on it, but i do think that they know more then what they are telling us though ...

  • Do not fear your enemy, the worst they can do is kill you. Do not fear friend's,at worst,they may betray you. Fear those who do not care. They neither kill nor betray,but betrayel and murder exist's because of their silent consent.

  • @hanna23able I can think of worse things than death.

  • People who think about these questions are nuts... people who believe a banking elite are conspiring for world dominance are nuts... people who question the major assassinations are nuts... Everyone knows, physics doesn't apply to terrorists, bankers don't qualify as conspirators, and it only takes one nut to kill a Kennedy. If these nutjobs weren't so nuts, they wouldn't assassinate their own leaders!

  • @zakquack Truth.

  • And your government used 9/11 as an excuse to murder ppl. thousand's of miles away.If you ridicule other's who have sincere doubt's&who know factual info.that directly contradict's the official version&who want an explanation from those who hold the key's to our government,&have motives,means,&opportunity to pull off a 9/11 but you r too lazy or fearful or to check into the fact's yourself what does that make you?

  • Culturebully..if you can beleive a 757 boeing flown by a guy whose flight instructor dispaired his student would ever learn even the flight control's&remarked that he was at best a very shoddy pilot. And you beleive this guy could fly into the pentagon then you will beleive whatever your told without discernment or common sense.By the way this isn't about party,it's not about bush bashing.it's about our country,our constitution,&our future.Your countryman have been murdered by our government.

  • @hanna23able He didn't have to take off or land, simply guide the plane into one of the largest buildings in the world.

  • culturebully..have you read the 9/11 commission report's?

  • When did our society progress to 'don't ask question's. and if you do your classified as 'nut's'. One thing we do know is the commssion 9/11 report was balony.

  • @hanna23able no one is telling you not to ask questions. its just conspiracy theorists have already made up their minds before they ask them. the answers you seek are all there, there are rational explanations for everything, you just choose to find your answers in paranoid, biased literature and youtube videos. take a look under the conspiracy theory tab at itwastyped. com, it may just help you make it back to the real world!

  • So you developed a comprehensive theory of 9/11 while watching a bunch of DVD's in a state of extreme sleep deprivation?

  • The problem is was it photoshopped? There is NO way our governement wouldn't 'catch' this so the entire world can see their handiwork so it was probably photoshopped. Can you image the special effect's that can be done these day's? And did anyone notice on 9/11 two news stations while covering the 9/11 event went 'blank' while filming the 2nd.plane hitting the wtc?

  • I learned that 2 of the boeing planes on 9/11 can be taken over by remote control.If a pilot is incapable for whatever reason in landing or flying his plane those on the ground can take control of the controls and land it without the pilot. Also there is no way a huge 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There is a recent video put on youtube showing a small object crashing into the Pentagon. It was so fast the eye almost didn't catch it. It was small..superfast and flying about 20 ft. above ground.

  • fuck this i just wanna see evil faces in the smoke

  • FUCKIN' ILLUMINATI & BILDERBERG GRP., WE NEED TO STOP THEM !!!

  • @lusmanRally we will we will! Focus on solutions not frustration we'll get there!

  • @Strange0ne i hope....

  • WAIT!!! Did she say "never before in the history of the world has a steel building collapsed due to fire"? That is a flat out lie..5 off the top of my head

  • Left, Right, Left, Right. Yea, I believe everything that Chickenhawk, Antidraft. Gullible, Unconstitutional Republicans have to say. The Aussie is correct. Republicans cannot handle the truth. Respectfully, USN SPECOMM 1970-1993

  • and dont call obama a n***er. he is a rat . not becuase he is black but becuase he kisses jewish ass - and binladen has been dead since 2007 but they held it back to continue the war on terror and to use it when the people would lose faith in obama.Benazir Bhutto exposed the fact that osama was dead in 2007 and got killed by ''suicide bombers'' - the hi-jackers were saudi's - so afghanistan was not involved at all - and they were payed big money by c.i.a to do it and to go crazy in vegas b4hand

  • /watch?v=ZgzRnrOP-44 =fake binladen on al jazeera

    /watch?v=KiKyWJRRjnU&feature=r­elated =real bin laden on al jazeera

    the subtitles were ''problematic'' according to arabic expert and he had told several journalists he had nothing to do with it- also how can journalist find him but special intellegence was searching for almost 10 years .and even in the subtitles he doesnt claim the attacks he just explains why the were attacked.they have been killing innocent palastinians for 50 years now.

  • RIP man at 7:00. He apparently went down with the towers.

  • Inside what? My pants

  • Comment removed

  • @TheObamaMorons If a commercial airliner like a 767 or 757 were indeed capable of 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet then I would believe that a 767 or 757 hit the world trade centers. Pythagorus was right. Numbers don't lie, people do. Boeing has a VMO/MMO fact sheet. It details exactly how fast a 767 can go and at what altitude. Until someone proves that to be invalid, I'm going with the science.

  • @TheObamaMorons I have always maintained that a 767 or 757 cannot do 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet without structural failure. Whatever hit the twin towers, it was not a commercial airliner.

  • @TheObamaMorons My working theory is that intelligence services used guided missiles to hit the targets, then fed the manipulated video to the news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, FOX, CBS and all the other corporate media. There is no long shot of any commercial airliner hitting the twin towers. Video manipulation was old school in 2001. When that story comes out, no one will believe anything anymore. 

  • May those in the intelligence services who participated in this ritual realize what they have done. They have chosen to betray their brethren, the ones they swore an oath to protect. What do you do now? Anyone with logical reasoning skill can see that something is wrong with the government's explanation of what hapened on 911. There is only one truth. 911 was an inside job.

  • If an AGM-129 ACM cruise missile passed above you in the street, travelling at 800km/h, would you see it clearly? Apparently some people did see something. On September 11th 2001, many eyewitness reports of seeing what appeared to be a jet liner flying upside down over Shanksville PA Could this be what they actually saw?

    /watch?v=RxXCIntpts4

  • Just don't know what to believe anymore. Was it a conspiracy or not? Will be watching full documentary. Looks good.

  • @traceycrosss We will never know the truth.Despite all the evidence leading to govt involvement they will NEVER be held accountable,I think there is enuff to prove something shady went on,but no one will ever prosecute them.This was a crime scene yet it was not investigated as such.People will still post their theories on youtube till the end of time,but it will never be solved.

  • Wow...that's pretty damning footage!

  • @zelenko2 it debunks the governments story -.- so not made by government .best point in this vid is about how the windsor tower had a 20 hr inferno and no structural damage what so ever.and wtc fell after 90 min and there wasnt even alot of fire .

  • this documentary sucks.. made by goverment

  • Comment removed

  • Well, matrix sucks a lot, and has a lot of satanic subliminal messages... but this documentary is awesome!

  • Welcome to the Jewnited States of Israel !!! Zionist Jews enslaved us all.

    Rothschild Zionists own EVERYTHING !!! Calling people "sheep" would be an insult to the sheep... it's more like an ant-farm run by Zionist Jews.

    I'm not here to convince anyone of anything.. I only tell you what I know... all the facts are at everyone's fingertips... and always remember, with words anyone can argue for or against any cause and find their own justification... it's easy to make someone believe in lies.

  • @ZeroBoostBuick its sad that this comment is one of the top 2. You really believe its the jews huh? seriously? ahhhh...thats right, the prince, the pope, the vatican, the yeti, the rothschild...they own everything in the world, including the newspaper, and they all meet in a secret location known as "the middle"

    Please tell me you are making this stuff up or just trying to be ironical...please please

  • @Joeysnamehere if you had most of the money in the world you would also wanna control the whole world... so happens that Zionist Jews have most of the money, especially Rothschild family... I see you know nothing about forbidden history,... you should start with the book "Under the sign of the Scorpion" by Juri Lina... this one book has thousands upon thousands of historical facts no one can deny.

    USS LIBERY, King David hotel Bombing, Lavon Affair, 911 and so much more = Israel false flags.

  • the us goverment just made my shitlist

  • @turkyish The US Government just now made your shit list?? Where have you been?

  • @MrJeggus i went by the official story,,,,,,,HAD NO IDEA of all these facts

  • @turkyish clearly you like so many others have no brain and after watching this you think well they are telling m something so i will believe them ugh go get a brain and think for your self and stop letting the TV, Computer do it for you

  • @Drummer1Bodhran1 lol clearly your a moron. it simply states facts and compair them to the events of 9/11.

    windsor tower burned for 20 hrs on almost every floor and its still standing.WTC burned very little for 90 mins and cempletely collapsed.

    Ofc people can think for themselves these vids only gives us something to think about . .your brain didnt teach you how to talk people around you did .neither did it teach you how to write and be a smartass, school did.

  • All these Thruther vids rehash the same crap. Steel buildings dont fall from fire, yayaya. fuel was gone on impact ayaya. Get some real evidence or shut your collective pie-holes...

  • @Camangela777

    There is real evidence you gronk

  • @Ravenous11yt. Dude I'm Christian and I don't believe what your saying it clearly states saying man will not know the time and date of the end of the world or anything about what you are saying. Stuff your saying gives Christians a bad name and ppl think we are crazy bc of the stuff like this. I'm sorry to say but wherever you heard of this from is a false prophet and if that person said it was from God or Jesus, no I'm sorry that's not true. Bc that would be saying he is like John smith make b

  • The bible gives you numerical clues in its passage numbers

    Satan is thrown down to earth on Dec. 21 2012 (Revelation 12:9) 2012.9 converted to a date evaluates to 12/21/12

    2013 is Mark of the Beast year, (Revelation 13) (13!)

    It is the Hexagram - six pointed star of 13 dots

    Name of a man = Solomon

    Number of its name = 666 talents of gold collected by Solomon in one year (2 Chronicles 9:13 (13!)

    Solomon was the apostate king of Israel that led Judah into idolatry

    Check my channel!

  • Your a moron on u tube, this video proves facts !! AE911TRUTH Experts disagree with the uneducated child below me. A+ vid

  • This video is one of the biggest jokes out there. 911 was not an inside job.

  • Chavez is wrong !! If the world is waking up, why Venezuelans ARE NOT ? If they were, he would be hanging from a tree long time ago..

  • @EutuveX i see we learn our news from fox.com

  • @andytsa

    not me, dear... when a topic is important..I do more research..try to..lol

  • @EutuveX i live every year 3 months in venezuela cause my mom is from there.her family is oppossed to chavez and yet they admitt many good things.obviously for u- from behind a screen far away- things are either black or white and in this case u c only blackk.chavez feeds hundreds of thousands.ever seen the country's money?where do they go?do u know that every venezuelan citizen knows about every cent and where it goes?and chavez would never ever kill his own kind like bush.its u who needs inf

  • @andytsa

    Como te atreves ? Como te atreves ? Si vas a Venezuela cada tres meses de turista ( evidentemente tu familia es de emigrantes que han acumulado riqueza con su trabajo ) deberías de saber lo que pasa en ese malogrado país . "every Venezuelan knows where every cent from the $ 1.200 B the country has received for its oil in the last 12 years " ?? How dare you ? Bye the way , I am a Venezuelan citizen, bitch ! Chavez would never kill his own kind ? Ask your family, bitch..ask them !

  • end do not come with govermenthal research from nist that even didnt test for explosives then it isnt evedence that is wright...

    and if the trojan is the rulingclass and they do that by a deceptional way it is sow hilarious that some say fact by asking the same goverment om telling the truth

    in history the only thing you hear it was war and takiing over end now it seems to be a pethatic to asked on a healthy way questions in a democraty

  • the only pathetic idiot is the one is a sane man by saying no evidenseresearch end the rescue workers and all other specialist are pethatic too , if you search nanothermite is found on the steal beams by experts that is i think no where they talking about and you look i think just at the endlescorrected facts of th nistreport

    i think if you say that firefighters and all other men that are in a normal day also try to save your ass idiots and who is pethatic than

  • We the people still have our rights fight the NEW WORLD ORDER FIGHT IT AND TELL EVERYONE ABOUT IT GET THE MESSAGE OUT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT CEO's FED'S ETC. are already in act of it is our only hope to get people to realize befroe its to late RON PAUL 2012 PEOPLE HE IS OUR LAST HOPE

  • Personally I can see how an airliner could easily have done what they say it did even without the fire...you gotta remember things are generally built by the lowest bidder and just because someone says they designed something to withstand a certain event doesn't actually mean that they A) did...or B) were successful...all it really would have needed was one design flaw or some substandard material here and there...of course some of the conspiracy theories are just as likely so who knows...

  • @possumverde

    Ok, still doesn't explain WTC building 7.

  • when the next one comes it will be even bigger. will you believe then?

  • that's jesus power you know it's showing us to come to him

  • The idiocy of the US government has been exposed.

    They thought that they would get away with anything and dismiss it by blaming Muslims... just like Muslims are blamed for every terrorist attack.

  • i never realized that was recorded on jan. 25,2001. that is bizarr

  • Yesterday I spoke to an aussie trooper who just got back from Afghanistan. He said the reason they were over there was not to kill "terrorists" but to secure the drug trade/trafficking in the middle east . He is absolutely disgusted with the whole 911 false flag operation/invade iraq/ invade Afghanistan bullshit . Fucking evil

  • @drewsiboberinski Im a Firefighter in one of the big 3 cities. People can believe different things thats our right but what is 100% is TRUE is many of us working Americans have died for political reasons. The USA is changing so fast its hard to comprehend, these political / wealthy elite have to be eliminated. China has shown the WORLD that communism can be successful for the wealthy and the World elite have been taking notes. GOD BLESS

  • @CPDCFD cool. here's some cold hard stats: Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.

  • Respond to this video... Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News) Last known holder of the $6.6 billion lost: the U.S. government.

  • @drewsiboberinski If I lost $20 I would notice that. This money was probably split by Obama, Bush, Clinton and so on for the great work they did for out country.

  • Respond to this video...  Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)

  • @drewsiboberinski OR maybe someone could not account for it after they payed for it. Sounds like suspicious accounting practice by our military so why not just say its missing or imply that is was stolen. Wonder who got the 1 billion in there coffers?

  • Respond to this video... Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings

    Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion

    Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion

  • Respond to this video... Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questionable or supportable" - $3.2 billion

    U.S. Annual Air-Conditioning Cost in Iraq and Afghanistan - $20.2 billion (Source - NPR, June 25, 2011)

    U.S. 2009 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $7.3 billion as of Oct 2009

    U.S. 2008 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion

    U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)

  • @drewsiboberinski And there are people who are retired, in need of constant medical care who have worked for 50 years in the US. The nursing home will take all your earned property/savings before Medicare will pay for your long term care. We are fucking sheep, we need to be aware and take care of our families and SCREW the system like they have been screwing us and our families for years. There are Americans living in motel rooms while the FAT CATS are happily living in castles on our backs.

  • The People will wake up when they try to pull this crap again!

  • @Hotters7060ben The buildings DID survive the impacts. WTC 2 stood for 56 minutes after impact, and WTC 1 stood for 102 minutes.

    The builders did not take the fuel load into consideration when they estimated the damage from the 707, and never considered the kind of stress it would endure resulting from the huge fire plus the initial impact damage.

  • its not a mystery its fact hidden from us and blamed on osama bin laden(part of C.I.A)

  • No explosives or thermite would have been needed at all. The twin towers were severely damaged by the planes and the steel was weakened, not melted, by the fires. Those two factors were more than enough to collapse the buildings. No other steel building has ever collapsed from fire, but none of those buildings had been severely damaged buy huge airplanes, and none of them had to support as much weight above the damaged areas as the twin tower had to.

  • @TimothyRaymond1 More than enough? Sure, the impacts would have knocked out several central columns and support columns. And the fire would have weakened the steel to a degree. But not weakened enough to give way. And a computer simulation showed that the twin towers could have had even more columns knocked out and would still not have collapsed. I will try to find you the video.

  • @TimothyRaymond1..dude, do some research!.early reports by nyc fire fighters state that there was "rivers of molten steel" flowing through ground zero. Molten steel aside, how the f$%k do u explain the fact that the buildings didnt fall left, right, back, or front, but straight down on the spot, with miraculously minimal damage to surrounding buildings. World renowned architects openly say it is unbelievable that a internal steel structure would totally collapse straight down to the ground

  • @Elephtheria1 "Early reports" are the least credible. There were also early reports that the first plane was a Cessna, that there was a plane crash at the national mall, and the PLO took responsibility. When people are under stress they get confused, they relay bad information, they exaggerate, and their minds play tricks on them. For example, the people who supposedly hear explosions in the WTC could have just been hearing loud noises.

  • @KayBeeEee1983 explain to us then why many firefighters heard explosions yet these people do this every day and many give their lives,but they was hearing things that sounded way differant than any other fire...EXPLOSIONS.

  • @jstevens69n1 How many is many?

  • @jstevens69n1 Firefighters don't fight fires every day, jackass, especially not in skyscrapers. Any explosions heard could not have been from bombs because they wouldn't have been detonated 1 by 1. They would've been detonated all at once so any witnesses would die in the collapse. No one who survived the collapses heard bomb explosions.

  • @KayBeeEee1983 lol kaybee..i intended on having a intellectual conversation but after seeing you calling me a "jackass" i can see you have the mentality of a 2nd grader with down syndrome!!Its called a controlled demolishion and they set the explosives off in a pattern that weakens the structure so it falls straight down.Also you might want to research a little moe to see that many people said they heard several explosions,including FIREFIGHTERS.why did tower 7 fall straight down?

  • @jstevens69n1 Controlled demolitions don't involve detonating bombs one by one for over an hour. Hearing "explosions" means nothing. It was chaos inside the WTC. Those "explosions" could be anything. Tower 7 appeared to fall straight down because that's the way buildings collapse. Would you expect the buildings to fall like a tree would?

  • @KayBeeEee1983 in regards to tower 7,one side had damage to the lower part of it so yes i would expect that if you take a huge chunk out of a lower portion of a building it would fall like a tree would since that damaged part cant hold the weight of the building on that side.they let the towers burn before detonating them to fall.you can see that when they fell.do me a favor and search demolition fail (best failures) and then tell me building will fall straight down cause thats what they do..

  • @Elephtheria1 "how the f$%k do u explain the fact that the buildings didnt fall left, right, back, or front, but straight down on the spot, with miraculously minimal damage to surrounding buildings."

    WTC 2 didn't fall straight down, and they didn't do minimal damage. They did major damage to all the buildings around them. WTC 7 completely collapsed due to the damage caused by the collapse of WTC 1. WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 and several other buildings were all seriously damaged.

  • There’s a reason why most people believe in the official story. It’s the only logical one. It’s the only one that doesn’t rely on remote-controlled planes, cruise missiles, secretly placed explosives and elaborate government conspiracies. The buildings were destroyed by Al-Qaeda terrorists; they admitted to doing it. The government was not involved. I’m not a government agent. I’m not a sheep. I’m just using common sense.

  • @TimothyRaymond1

    Then use your common sense and answer "How did Steve Jackson Illuminati Card Game" know about a twin tower attack prior to 9/11, that was one of the cards a burning twin towers, it was yanked from him by Bush Senior himself, and Mr. Jackson was held for this, producing a card game? That gets you into trouble? How could he have know? research freemasons/illuminati/ the black pope/ and check out on here "Homeland Security Plans to Kill USA Citizens" and just listen to it, ^_-

  • Not very convincing, a fire compared with jet crashing into a building like a wrenching ball. Where do they get this crap.

  • @goonie79 You are someone with an attention span of 0.01 seconds correct? The entire point is that the inner core of both of the towers would still be standing, but they were not, and they also fell at free fall speed which can only be accomplished by controlled demolition, and that it is physically, scientifically and mathematically impossible for either of the towers to have fallen by jet fuel or the plane because of the way they were designed....I suggest receiving an education of some sorts.

  • @MuffedMuffins The Twin Towers did NOT fall at free fall. I'm a Truther and your making it hard to convince people to look deeper into building 7 which did fall at free fall because it was obviously a controlled demolition.

    The twin Towers did not fall at free fall, Watch the debris in the twin towers collapse the debris is falling faster than the building is collapsing therefore no free fall. watch?v=XGCyu1-qCG8

    Building 7 Was a controlled demolition

  • JFK was the best president in the USA. USA was the engine of the world in the past.. And now is the killer of the world.. USA gov + European corrupt politician elite + tiranic military industrial complex are bulding a worldwide dictatorship.. :-( We, all people around the world must wake up, take our hands and stops the NEW WORLD ORDER masterplan or the 90% of world population will be anihilated. Embraces from Spain, my good american brothas

  • So far loose change is better

  • how can someone be so naive. 9/11 was obviously an inside job

  • When somebody is gonna take a action!? fuck bush!

  • that witness at 3:15 sounds like a bad actor.

  • @rasputinsdayoff 9/11 Fake Witness (Actor, Mark Humphrey)

  • On a completely different note, the narrator of this has a relaxing voice.

    She should make relaxation CD's.

  • 911 was an inside job there were bombs in the building i think

  • and american people still voted for Bush second time what a shame

    brainwashed people you just think how you are going to eat junk food

  • I strongly recommend watching: money as debt, freedom to fascism, ring of power, 911 mysteries, viberation creates form, behold a pale horse, 2012 enigma, Jim Marrs the 4th reich, the polarity matrix field, Graham Hancock - Quest for the Lost Civilization ,Red Ice TV - Episode 4 - Symbolism in Logos, Indigenous Native American Prophecy, Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 1 of 43, Consuming Kids:The Comercialisation of Children, Fluoride Deception Part 1, Are You a Sovereign Yet...

  • The female narrator of this has quite a pleasant voice.

  • Truthers are the most pitiful people I have ever had the misfortune to meet. Christians, UFO & Big Foot enthusiasts, Scientologists, and every other whack job out there aren't as bad as 911 Truthers!!! Down with Truth!

  • @punctualbird

    And you're a prime example of someone who doesn't have an idea of what he's talking about!

    Engineering professors from around the world are spreading the word that the "official" story behind the collapse of the three buildings is full of holes and scientifically impossible.

  • @adamrosemead1 I have researched 911 for about five years now. I even gave the "Truth" Movement a fair hearing but was able to rule out so many of their assertions that their core argument of an inside job was found to be incorrect. I am not an agent of the CIA, I am an independent citizen. And yes, some engineers do believe it was an inside job - they are simply wrong. Their arguments are all academic and not based in practical application.

  • @punctualbird

    Opinion has little to do with being part of the Truther movement.

    I don't know what Truther assertions you're referring to but the assertions that the (official mouthpiece) NIST has made are scientifically wrong &, at times, intentionally fraudulent.

    i.e. Since they couldn't explain how WTC7 could have a partial collapse of 2.5 sec @ FF acceleration (w/o explosives) they had to label their final Nov '08 final report "unscientific," a rare instance of honesty for them.

  • speechless!

  • FUCK !! IT'S ALL I'VE TO SAY FUCK !! EVERTHING WAS PLANNED !!

  • Comment removed

  • Why do so many Americans still believe the official story? We show them the facts, we point out the logic, and yet they still don't get it. It is because logic and facts will not convince people who refuse to believe what is simply too horrible to be true. If they accepted the fact that the three WTC buildings came down in controlled demolition, they would have to face up to the fact they their whole lives are based on lies. Easier to just bury their heads in the sand and deny the truth.

  • @SeymourLauren

    agreed

  • @SeymourLauren

    this is true, most americans just dont have the courage to admit the truth of the 9/11 events. As this would then mean they are also responisble for the aftermath of the events, for continuing to support and pay taxes to their government. Americans wont just openly revolt against their disgusting government, they are not truly honorable people. If somethings not affecting them directly theyd rather turn their heads and believe what they are told, whilst the whole world h8s them

  • @reuu1 that is pretty true to most human societies, I am yet to find a revolution or similar movement in any nation in history that wasn't either headed and mostly carried out by interested parts with most of the population just waiting and watching the outcome, or happened because things were so bad that people had little option but force change.

  • @SeymourLauren Because your "facts" don't actually add up to anything substantial. It is not unbelievable that a fire brought down the buildings after getting hit with massive jetliners. It is unbelievable to think that not one person who was involved in the "inside job" you are touting hasn't come forward with an official document or contract that would link the government to the act (ie. a contract to plant bombs, etc.) The fact that wikileaks had nothing to say about an inside job is telling

  • @172drvr

    The Twin Towers were constructed with 98 million kilos of high grade steel which equals 105,600 tons, EACH!

    What fires brought them down?

    If you look at "North Tower Collapse World Trade Center" you can see multi ton pieces of the building being flung away from the building.

    Very heavy steel beams were jettisoned into neighboring buildings more than a hundred yards away.

    Fires don't do that, massive explosions do.

    What airliner hit WTC7 & caused freefall acceleration?

  • @adamrosemead1 Take a playing card and squeeze it between your fingers. It shoots out because of the pressure on both sides. This is what happened here, just on a massive scale. This DOES NOT happen during real controlled demolitions because the explosives cut the steel at exactly the right moment and allow it collapse onto itself. The explosions you're talking about would have been defining and yet there are non in the video of the collapse. Why has no one come forward with gov contracts yet?

  • @172drvr

    "Why has no one come forward with govt contracts yet?"

    You're kidding, right?

    On 09-TEN-01, Sec of Defense,Donald Rumsfeld admitted that the Dept of Defense couldn't account for 2.3 TRILLION dollars. Where's the govt contract that would explain who took the money?

  • @adamrosemead1 Was that before or after 9/11? That had more to do with the Iraq war which I agree was a fuckup. What I'm saying is that with all you truthers (read: bullshitters) out there someone would come forward with a pay check or contract for work they did planting explosives in the wtc, but no one has. Regardless of the unfeasibility of having thousands of people planting bombs in the wtc without one person alerting someone they know. Nothing has come out, not even from wikileaks.

  • @172drvr

    Gee, that's a real hard question to answer "172."

    I wonder why no has come forward to admit to murdering THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE!!

    Now, I have a question for you:

    Why did the NIST label its own final Nov '08 report on the WTC7 collapse "unscientific?"

    Was it because it could not explain the partial 2.5 second collapse of WTC7 @ freefall acceleration w/o admitting to the use of explosives?

  • @adamrosemead1 Thousands of engineers? Bring me a dozen engineers that back you're theory and I'd pay more attention to you. They have to be engineers with actual degrees from four year institutions though, not YouTube scholars like yourselves.

  • @172drvr

    You must not be familiar with the Patriots Question 9/11 website. In the two sections devoted to "Engineers & Architects" & "Professors" there are many highly qualified experts who openly question the WTC collapses.

    How about:

    -Hugh Bachmann, PhD, Prof Emeritus & former Chairman of the Dept of Structural Dynamics @ the Swiss Fed Inst of Technology?

    -Jorg Schneider, PhD, Prof Emeritus, also @ the Dept of Structural Dynamics @the Swiss Fed Inst of Technology

  • @172drvr

    More qualified experts who question 9/11? How about:

    -David L. Griscom, PhD, research physicist, 33 yrs @ the Naval Research Lab Washington, DC

    -Joel S Hirschhorn, PhD Materials Engineering, Prof of Metallurgical Engineering, Univ of Wisc

    -Henry W. Tieleman, Prof Emeritus, Engineering Science & Mechanics, VA Polytechnic Inst & State Univ

    -John Edward Anderson, PhD Astronautics, Prof Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering & former Prof of Aerospace & Mechanical Engrrring, Univ of Minn

  • @172drvr

    More qualified doubters of govt version of 9/11 collapses? How about:

    -Osman Kemal Kadiroglu, PhD Nuclear Engineering, Prof Emeritus, Hacettepe Univ, Ankara, Turkey

    -Arkadiusz Jadczyk, Prof & Director of the Dept of Nonlinear Dynamics & Complex Systems, Inst of Theoretical Physics, Univ of Wroclaw

    -Dennis Bricker, PhD Industrial Engineering, Prof Emeritus, Univ of Iowa

    -Jay Kapraff, PhD Applied Mathematics, former Aerospace Engineer & Chemical Engineer

  • @adamrosemead1 it was not the fire that was sending the steel beams in neighboring buildings, it was the collapse that did it. You are not making any sense. I am amaze that people can look at the fall of the twin towers and say this look like a controlled demolision,,, not it don't.

  • @PierreNolet

    you're telling me that you believe that the collapse was induced by the jet fuel & airliner impact?

    1) the NIST admitted that both Towers maintained structural integrity after both impacts

    2) get a conversion calculator:

    10,000 gallons of jet fuel (kerosene)=1336.8 cubic ft

    area of 1 WTC floor=1 acre=43,560 sq ft

    If you were to spill the 10,000 gallons on one WTC floor it would reach a depth of approx 1/3 inch!!!

    ON ONE FLOOR!

    You must also believe in Santa!!

  • @adamrosemead1 Could you please stick to your initial claim about the fire sending Beams in neighboring buildings and not shift the go post to something else. Defend yourself on that. Where in the Official story do they claim that? This is not an admission that i cannot answers your 2 new claims i can! i simply don't want to enter an endless debate about every single points that truthers says about 9/11.

  • @PierreNolet watch?v=hSApOavkHg8 <-- Right there sir.

  • @PierreNolet

    As you can see in the video that "Jaffsickle" recommended that you view ("North Tower Exploding") huge sections of the building are being flung away from the it showing you both how monstrous beams can be shot out in the direction of other buildings. There are photos of these beams entering the sides of a neighboring building HORIZONTALLY not VERTICALLY as would occur if the beams were falling down.

    By admitting that beams fell away from the Towers you also disprove PANCAKING!!

  • @adamrosemead1 Wow this is worst than i thought so the puffs of smoke are not the result of the mass of the building compressing the air as it collapse. The energy release by the collapse could not explain the flying beams. Instead i have to believe that they have put explosive nearly everywhere in buildings where as many as 10 thousands people were working without anyone noticing it. All of that just to make it look like it is not a normal controlled demolition. i am sorry but this is madness.

  • @PierreNolet

    What has been verified is that a few weeks before 9/11, a technical "work crew" roped off areas of the Towers & prohibited public entrance. After they left bomb sniffing dogs were not allowed in either building.

    Do you think that his merits an investigation?

    Madness is believing the unscientific explanations given by the govt explanation.

    Science is science & their (NIST) side has been caught committing FRAUD in their explanations.

     Bad science at its worst.

  • @adamrosemead1 btw NIST do not support the pancake theory go read it.

  • @PierreNolet

    So far this conversation is following a familiar script:

    I refute your beliefs/accusations & you continue to ignore mine. Nothing new.

    Example: why didn't the NIST have an explanation for the 2.5 second partial collapse of WTC7 @ freefall acceleration?

    What does "dprjones" say about WTC7's partial collapse @ FF acceleration? or does he say anything?

    Why would the NIST prefer to label their report "unscientific" than admit the obvious use of explosives?

    N'est pas?

  • @adamrosemead1 that is because i am a stupid french and cannot win again your almighty and so powerful arguments that i will return suck the dick of my government master. adieu le cave.

  • @PierreNolet

    No "Pierre," I consider the French to be wonderful, INTELLIGENT people.

    It's the debunkers that are stupid

  • @a/damrosemead1 ok now that i have finish working i have some time for your weird theory. You have refute nothing. To claim that the puff of smoke in this video can only be explain by explosions is a joke, same for the beams in buildings horizontally. I defy you to go see any expert that have never study 9/11 and ask him what he think. He could say that maybe explosions could explain it but he will never be ready to go in a court of law to claim it is the only explanation possible.

  • @PierreNolet

    Members of the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine Eleven (SPINE) are ready to go to court today.

    All they are asking is the power to subpoena members of govt & examine the WTC evidence being held by the govt to check for traces of nanothermite.

    If I were to meet an "expert" (scientist or engineer) I would ask them if they knew that the NIST refuses to speculate on what caused the 2.5 sec partial collapse @ FREEFALL ACCELERATION of WTC7.

    How should they react?

  • @adamrosemead1 i am confuse, what exactly is stopping them from doing that? don't they need to go to court first then the judge can subpoena them? Also wtf would they keep evidence of there mischief? i mean you think they are powerful enough to make a really huge conspiracy work but somehow they are powerless to destroy those evidence.

    Please stop trying to move on to WTC7 i have already told you that i am not going to talk about everything truthers says about 9/11, focus on the twins towers.

  • @PierreNolet

    Members of WeAreChange have given EVERY member of Congress (both houses) the scientific paper on nanothermite found @ all the WTC sites.

    All 535 members of Congress. This is to get them to convene a federal court which will be powerful enough to issue subpoenas to govt officials.

    We still have to find a judge that is willing to hear our pleas for a true investigation (with peer review) into the destruction of the Twin Towers & WTC7.

    Your friends @ NIST do not!

    Why?

  • @PierreNolet I have a question, since the hi-jacking of airplanes is not a new thing and the US air force has a policy to escort any civil airliner that either refuses to reply to hails, turns off it's transponder, or deviates from it's flight plan with in 15 mins anywhere in the country why did this not occur??? Those planes did not..... disappear from radar, that is for damn sure!!!

  • @PierreNolet

    Do you seriously believe that the airliners had enough fuel to bring down these monsterously huge buildings?

    Even if all the fuel in both airliners hadn't exploded over the streets of NY (which can be seen in many videos) there wouldn't be enough fuel to more than WARM the steel in the buildings.

    10,000 gallons spread out over 105,600 tons of steel = ONE GAL OF FUEL PER 10.5 TONS OF STEEL!!

    What's left? Computers? Books? Furniture?

    What's left is a government fairytale!

  • @adamrosemead1 Take a playing card, put it between two fingers and bend it. What happens? It shoots out. If you think 105,600 tons of stuff compacting on itself is just going to fall straight down on itself, you're not even worth talking to. You don't think the 50,000 office workers would have noticed people lacing their building with explosives for the months it would have taken to rig that building for a free fall? Where were all the flashes?

  • @172drvr

    If you think that you can bend a 50 ton steel beam & it's going to react like a playing card then you've been taking some serious drugs.

    Why is it that you "debunkers" have been trying to convince people of something that DIDN'T HAPPEN. ie a "collapse" never happened. Just look at the videos of both Towers being demolished.

    They're NOT falling down, they're been blown outwards by powerful explosions.

    So, who are you going to believe, these debunkers or your lying eyes?

  • @172drvr -- Have you bothered to even check out the facts? Three skyscrapers were brought down by jet planes crashing into two of them? Even though the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of jetliners, and thousands of architects and engineers say it is impossible for the three buildings to have come down the way they did due to fire? I suggest you examine the facts for yourself rather than taking the MSM's word for it.

  • @172drvr

    Actually a few people HAVE come forward. But that is beside the point. You call unsubstantial the "fact" (which NIST admits) that Building No. 7 fell for over two seconds at free-fall acceleration? Have you ever heard of the law of conservation of energy, or law of conservation of momentum? These are not man-made laws, but laws of physics. The upper portion of the building could not possibly fall at free-fall acceleration unless the resistance below it were zero. How dat be?

  • @SeymourLauren I have to agree to an extent, sure, innocent people were killed, but that's the price that they have to pay, mental warfare.

  • @SeymourLauren . because they are the dumbest bunch of people by far...... AMERICANS .. either wake up or go shoot yourself before you support any more of this government crime...

  • @SeymourLauren Alexandre Dumas pere wrote over 400 historical novels exposing world tyranny(Roman Catholic Empire). Alexandre Dumas pere was born near paris in 1802 and 'coincidentally' in 1902 The Society of Gesu(Jesuits) were expelled from France for the 3rd and last time. Alexandre Dumas pere wrote The Man in The Iron Mask in 1848 and 'coincidentally' in the same year The Society of Jesus(Jesuits) were expelled from France for the 2nd time. Jesuits have been expelled from 83 countries.