Added: 3 years ago
From: BionicDance
Views: 3,557
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (121)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Awesome, this was a pleasure to watch. Good show, and keep it up! Keep spreading knowledge!

  • @lancejz Working on a new one; glad you dig the series. :)

  • @BionicDance Great news! I'm all caught up now.

  • you are brilliant

  • @BionicDance Was I supposed to tear up when you started on about a human team effort? I am glad I found your channel. I love it so far and your sci-fi style animations are awesome. They remind me of Reboot, a cartoon I was able to watch only rarely, when I played hookie from church on Sundays in the 80s or 90s. ^_^

  • @Smokatronic Tear up? Naw...I was hoping more for a "Fuck, yeah!" ;)

  • yea shes a lesbian no offense realy

  • You do a good job with emotion and expression, and , in particular, with eyes. They really tell the tale, with emphasis. Please keep it up. Also, all artists put themselves into the work they do; writers write from experience; you how it goes. So Sandra and Keight overlap a bit? What's wrong with that? Your detractors will use it against you. Ignore them. They do not have the ability to grasp art, or artists.

  • MARRY ME SANDRA

  • really fantastic. that zoom in for CU on "He isnt." was brilliant. YOu really have fiercely sharp developed intellect. I wish I had smart friends like you. A lot of people are dumb or just dont use their smarts. A+

  • if there was a god. what would it look like, or how would it be?

  • Comment removed

  • I completely agree. And I can see the appeal of wanting there to be a god, but even a deistic god doesn't make sense, since why would a disinterested god, or a god disinclined to guide its creation, create in the first place? I don't have an ant farm because I don't want or need one, and probably would ignore it or forget about it after a couple of days. What point is there in creating or having a world, only to ignore it? To the detriment of the beings that inhabit it? It's all nonsense.

  • I like the postive messge that you are trying to get out there. I agree in that for an atheist time is the most vauble thing a person has, and it shouldn't be cheapen by thinking you have an infinte amout of it, i.e. eternal life. Be glad and thankful when some spends this vauble comodity on you, and experiance the same joy as you spend yours on others.

  • I just can't get over how great an animator you are.

    I've been faving every one of these as I watch them, just because I have a massive soft spot for indie animators.

    But you're really, really good.

    I wonder if you'd consider making a feature-length film with this character, and a plot and story. But you're a great dialogue writer too. It's very hard to write monologues that can remain very engaging, and be funny and insightful. And animated!

    But you do.

  • *blush* Aww, shucks... :)

    I HAVE considered making a feature film, but...it's a LOT of work and I'm just one person. But I'm working on a new short series you might enjoy called "Java Centauri". It's about an alien coffeeshop. :)

  • @BionicDance I want to hug Howwie :3 <3

  • I have many stuffed animals and I too have wished they were alive...

  • Too right - we/re all in this together!

  • I love your videos, BionicDance. Keep the coming!

  • Well, I'll at least keep it breathing hard! :D

    Thanks for watching!

  • how long do most of these episodes take to animate?

  • Anywhere from four or five days to two weeks...depends on if there are complications.

  • @BionicDance: Exceptional animation in this episode; brilliant body movement as she gets out the stuffed toy.

  • Thanks! I appreciate you noticing! :)

  • @BionicDance: It really stood out; the kind of shot most people would just fudge. The whole animation is good, body language and facial expressions and so on, but that one difficult shot done so well really sells the character and the point she's making.

  • *grin* There IS an error in that shot, though...if you look, the lid of the box she opens intersects the console.

    But thanks! :)

  • Shh! You'll spoil the illusion. It's a tiny error and we're all massively jealous of your talent. In a fair universe, you'd be making buckets of money.

  • @BionicDance

    You are living in science fiction.

    Experience the thing you don't believe in then you will know. Your life is not the life of others. Your experiences are not the experiences of other. Wishes have nothing to do withit. Experiences have everything to do it. When you lose all in suffering maybe you too will find that you cry and whine for forgiveness to a deaf entity.

  • Very poetic. And completely meaningless.

  • BionicDance Very poetic. And complete <<

    does your description of evil mean that any form of crime, can be committed without punishment, when the perpetrator is never apprehended in their life?

  • There are Atheists in foxholes, sorry to tell you.

  • @Angelsdawn foxholes<<

    WOW how unique. must have stayed up all night to come up with that one

  • Not unique. But true.

  • While I disagree with your points, I have to confess that I liked the video. You presented them in a cool and non confontational way. Well done.

  • Did you ever hear a song called "the Puppy Song"

    By Harry Nilsen in the 1970s

    His chorus is

    "Dreams are nothing more than wishes

    and a wish is just a dream we wish to come true"

    Ahh... they don't write them like that anymore

    The song is about a boy wishing for a real dog

    I couldn't help but think of it when you brought out your Husky

    Hope is a close kin to a wish

    There is always hope

  • I don't waste my time talking to my ceiling.

  • Bionic,

    Great job on this video and the graphics and the ending, you made a CGI Howie, that's cool :)

    Looking forward to your next video.

    Best,

    Deconverts.

  • Great job on the computer graphics!

  • You're not believing hard enough. Believe harder!

  • @Noah2112

    but if i try to

    it makes my eyes bleed

  • It's kind of like, when people are faced with Althiemer's disease they just throw up their hands and say "Well, I'm sure this is all part of God's plan." Instead of doing that, people should be trying to find a cure for Althiemer's. (And I apologize if I'm misspelling that.)

  • oh so howie is real.

  • Oh, my, yes...indeed.

    I've had him since I was very small...and he's just now lying less than a foot from me as I type this. :)

  • Oh right thats cool.

    for interest sake lying a foot from me now is a D cell maglite touch but I don't have much of an emotional attachmet to that however. still its usful if the power goes out.

  • Your videos are cool but the space theme makes them feel kind of cheesy.

  • *blush* I...kinna LIKE cheesy. ;)

  • Ha, okay. I'll keep watching.

  • Bionic

    My first visit.

    I don't see anything cheesy of the video. I guess it too is in the eye of the beholder.

    I liked this video and I want to watch all of them.

  • Careful, someone might try to DMCA you for showing like 15 seconds of Toy Story. People are really that stupid -_-.

  • They can try.

    I know my Copyright Law, and this falls under Fair Use.

  • Deistic god? That's a opinionated conjecture on the concept of God. If God exists, you can't make a claim of what he could or could not be like.

  • And yet, those who believe god exists do exactly that. All the time.

  • for some yes, but most interpret God through the some religious text as opposed to their own thoughts for what God should be like.

  • With regards to the religious text, how is that anything BUT a claim of what god is like? Or, for that matter, one's own thoughts?

    It seems to me that religious people claim BOTH that god exists and that god is a certain way.

  • It's a claim yes, but the bible is substantiated enough through its prophecies and consistency in interpretation to not be merely a conjecture about God.

  • No, it's not. Most of the "evidence" regarding the bible myths are hearsay or eighth-hand, none of it verifiable like most historical accounts.

  • Really? Most historians, theistic or not, would disagree with you on that.

    Many of you atheists have a lot in common with creationists; you'll ignore evidence when it doesn't suit you and make claims without properly researching things for yourself.

  • No, we just have standards of evidence that actually MAKE SENSE.

    In other words, we don't accept evidence that isn't empirical. Which is only reasonable and logical.

  • We're discussing historical evidence here not scientific.

  • There'z no difference between the two, frankly.

    If something ACTUALLY happened versus being JUST a story, there will be empirical evidence, which makes this a scientific matter.

  • Historical events can't be repeated (which is part of the empirical method) the same way scientific experiments can, so we can only substantiate or discredit historical events by making use with what we have, or by uncovering older documents. I commend your ability to animate, I just wish you'd think more about your atheistic stance before promoting it.

  • Okay, you're eight flavors of wrong, here.

    First, it's called the SCIENTIFIC method, not the empirical method.

    Second, we're not talking about forming a hypothesis which we then prove using the scientific method, thus developing a theory.

    Third, we ARE talking about proving that something IS real or that something DID happen, as relying on subjective eyewitness accounts is NOT how history is written.

    Fourth, I've thought PLENTY about my stance; it seems that YOU need to think more.

  • "as relying on subjective eyewitness accounts is NOT how history is written."

    Primary sources include eyewitness accounts, you will find very few history books that don't rely on these types of primary sources.

  • And do you think that a SINGLE eyewitness account is enough for a history book or historian to confidently describe an event as having DEFINITELY happened? *raised eyebrow*

    Cuz if so, there'z this bridge in Brooklyn I could let go cheap...

  • You do realize that the bible's a library of eye witness accounts, not a single account, with most books/letters written independently of the other books within it don't you?

  • No, seriously...that bridge can be yours today; only twenty grand!

    *rolls eyes skyward*

    The bible is a library of after-the-fact and second-to-fifth-hand accounts with ZERO corroborative non-biblical accounts to back up any of its supernatural claims, and NOT a reliable source of historical information AT ALL.

    But thanks for playing!

  • Rubbish, accounts from Josephus, Tacitus (both Romans), Suetonius, the Jewish Talmud concurred events about Christ (and 1st century AD prophecies) despite the fact that the Jews hated him.

    Thanks for proving to me that you'd rather make claims about the bible than actually go and research these claims yourself.

  • Did you just...COMPLETELY miss the word 'supernatural' in there? Hmm? *raised eyebrow*

    Jeebus may well have been a real guy, but there are NO accounts of his miracles that come from reliable extra-biblical sources. None.

  • Nope I read it fine, Josephus recorded supernatural events around the destruction of Jerusalem (one of the main themes of revelation - which was written by some guy isolated and imprisoned from everyone else on an island).

  • Oooooookaaayyyy...and this, to you, constitutes a convincing account, does it?

    That bridge? Yeah, it comes with a GREAT view of Manhattan...y'interested? I can let it go cheap!

  • Well, yeah, most historians do.

  • I have NEVER read a history book which makes supernatural claims. EVER.

    ...unless it was written by some fundie fucktard, that is. Exactly what history books are you READING? *raised eyebrow*

  • Okay, you're just backtracking now - when I was referring to primary sources, it's probably best if we end this conversation.

  • No, I'm NOT actually backtracking; this is the relevant point and always has been.

    But I agree; it's best this ends. We're just talking past each other at this point. We simply do not hold the same standards for evidence and so we have no basis for actually reaching a consensus.

  • the5y...

    No they dont & if they R honest 1s they cant. No written accounts (especially from 2K yrs ago) could ever B accepted as true. Thats just normal historical narative. When the S. Claims start, then, the requirement 4 evidence skyrockets!

    if there were 50 agreeing eye-witnesses which we had no evidence 4, other than text, they'd have 2 B taken with a grain of salt, especially if those witnesses couldnt B identified & proven 2 have existed. Even then, theres no way to verify.

    Lame claim!

  • Bionic

    Just yesterday, I spent about 3 hours trying to argue this same exact issue witha Fubdie who didn't want to hear it! He was in deep denial & kept saying the resurrection was true simply by way of the biblical accounts! I even explain the problems with M,M,L,& J, in that there was conflicting accounts Y apparent plagiarism between at least 2 of the 4, so how can we take any of them seriously after that?

    It's sad that some want to believe so bad, they'll accept anything as evidence!!

  • the5y..

    Josephus is considered a fraud. But it makes no difference bcuz it's all hearsay!! Written historical accounts cannot be relied on unless there is additional evidence to support it. But once supernatural claims r presented, the playing firld changes. It's even harder to give "eny" ceredence to such claims. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!"

    prophecies?? All of that could have easily been manipulated by the fathers of the early church...the NT to match the OT.

  • Religion... Plainly put - is InSaNiTy. Perhaps, before science was being used, it had its place in the world. What other explanations could humans come to when they didn't have our minds, our tools, our technology, our experiences? But, now the idea of religion has become quaint, outdated, even obsolete if you may. I believe that soon, there could be an awakening of consciousness. With religion struck off the face of the planet; real world peace will finally be given an actual chance.

  • I want to see more videos like this. Keep up the work on animation.

  • I really loved the picture of your stuffed animal at the very end!

  • Well, I thought it'd be a nice touch, letting people know that Howie's real and that Sandra was basically telling MY story about him... :)

  • Count on me! Funny, theists expect their deity to "make things right" while they are as cruel, nasty and sick as they want "because God demands it!"

  • Well, it's not as if their god is the most rational, reasonable, kind, and peaceful role model.

    I mean, theirs is the god that tortured a guy on a dare from Satan, theirs is the god that sent meteorites to destroy Gay Vegas (aka, Sodom and Gomorrah), theirs is the god that drowned THE ENTIRE WORLD except Noah and his menagerie, theirs is the god who gives no indication that he exists yet allows people to be dumped into ETERNAL TORMENT for not believing in him

    God's an ASSHOLE.

  • Good points all! Wish I were a film maker, you gave me a great idea. Something about God, then natural disasters, floods and other crazy shit. Then that scene from Back to the Future III when Marty calls Mad Dog an asshole.

  • Great job on your vids, I hope you make more. And I agree, god is an asshole... christians take after him very well

  • Excellent! I look forward to an atheistic animated film, which would be well worth purchasing. I don't think such a thing has yet been made.

  • perfect.....kids would love this....and they really need to see it.

    O+

  • I found this one very engaging. You made a great connection in relating the movie to the concept. I've only spent one class of a semester learning how to model, but I'm hoping to get a career in game design (3-D or otherwis, as I love mixed media stuff, but my ultimate goal is to educate).

  • A most excellent video.

    A most rational point.

    You have another team member.

    FTW!

  • LOL Yeah, you're full of somethin' tonight! I have an irreverent sense of humor, too - we'll get along just great! :-)

  • I do believe so.

    Subbed back, BTW. On the merits of your vids, not just reciprocity. :)

  • "On the merits of your vids, not just reciprocity. :) "

    Ahhhh, and therein lies all the difference! Thanks!

  • This is Mind-Blowing animation - 2 thumbs way up! :-)

  • Thanks! :)

    Say, speaking of which, did you hear about the hooker with a degree in psychology?

    ...she'll blow your mind. ;)

  • LOL I must be getting old, since I didn't see that one coming!

  • Well, next time perhaps you'll see it BREATHING HARD! ;)

    ...I'm fulla these. *grin*

  • Awesome series!!! I hope to see more!

    Subscribed.

  • BionicDance have you ever thought about doing videos where u rationally examine other topics instead of religion?things like ideologies,philosophical ideas about human nature,society etc. i would really love to see you do something like that :)

  • Well, I COULD...but religion's the topic that bugs the CRAP out of me, so that's the one I tend to focus on.

    Besides, human nature and society aren't exactly rational topics; much of society comes down to preference, which isn't exactly a rational thing, and human nature has an annoying tendency to also be irrational. To critically examine them in order to try and MAKE them rational seems to me to be a denial of human nature.

    I prefer to rationally deal with existence claims, debunking faith.

  • well,i just thought it would be nice to hear your thoughts on other stuff.Stuff that influences our lives much more then religion,like political ideologies such as capitalism and communism....but maybe that's boring and as you said it all comes down to preferences...so yeah.But i feel that such things should be discussed and examined rationally because they are such a huge part of our lives....so i guess what i'm saying is that i'd like to hear u talk about things that i'm interested in...

  • Well, religion certainly affects our lives in rather far-reaching ways.

    As a lesbian, I find that religion has been used as an excuse to decide whether or not I can marry the person of my choice. Or the choices of my straight friends to seek abortion if they want it. And in the medical community, stem cell research--which could have very far-reaching benefits for everybody--is being blocked by the religious as well.

    I'm simply attacking these problems at the root: religion.

  • yeah.religion affects those areas ,i agree with u especially with the stem cell research....but political ideologies decide wether u live in a mansion with a pool,all of it being your private property or u get the same payment as everyone else and everything that u got is state owned and u have to call everyone "comrade"...so these other topics are as,or more important then religion and i think they deserve the same attention as the atheism-theism disputes

  • Well, I find it difficult to call politics a discussion for rationality; I can't think of a more irrational, preference-based social construct than that...except possibly matters of love.

  • Yeah,youre probably right,I guess I shouldnt be so uptight about stuff like that,but when I see how countries affected by communism are like,such as north korea it kinda sucks me into this whole ideological thinkingbut I guess I should just be happy that I dont live in such countries,I guess I should believe in the hope that humanity will get to a point where its so technologically evolved that there wont be any need for economy or monetary systems,u know?

  • Hey thanks to NonStampCollecter I've subscribed - serious question though....I'm slightly worried about my obsession with religious bullshit and my incapacity to understand "believers." In social situations somebody starts quoting the bible, mentioning Jesus, mentioning the pope I HAVE to react - my girlfriend keeps reminding me that I shouldn't comment - that makes me angrier 'cause I have the right to talk as well. No? What are your thoughts?

  • Not really my area of expertise, compulsions. Wish I could help you out, sorry.

    I admire your spirit, tho, since it's on the right side. :)

  • ...and i guess that's kinda selfish of me

  • I've been watching your videos. I like how you present your arguments. Your skills as an animator haven't gone unnoticed either.

    Definitely subscription worthy!

  • I must say, I agree with all your points, except that "Science points to there being no deity, or a deistic one". Science says nothing about the existence of God, it's just not included. Science doesnt say "Organisms evolve, so God has nothing to do with it" nor does it say "Organisms evolve, so God had something to do with it". It's simply "Organisms evolve". Other than that particular point, I'd say that I enjoyed watching it, and look foward to the forth one :) Keep up the good work

  • Perhaps I should clarify; what science DOES say is, "Given the evidence, here is how organisms appear to have involved; the intervention of a deity was not apparent in our investigations and the process seems to work perfectly fine through entirely natural and mundane agencies."

    Which is more or less what I meant when I said that science points to there being no god, or to a non-interventionist deity.

    Does that clear it up?

  • Perfectly

  • damn, this chick is stone cold.

  • How can you SAY that? Did you watch the whole video?

    What about that last line: "Come on! Help me make this world a better place!" That's cold to you?

  • lol, seemed like icing on the cake of the slap in the face...

    like how theists say "god bless" when theyre done...

    we mean well, but id probably be pissed if i were a theist...watching the video honestly made me chuckle though...its nice to see an animated character tell it like it is.

  • I'd intended it more as a good natured call to arms, actually; I meant it when I said that it is up to US to make this the best possible universe in which to live; even theists believe that..."God helps those who help themselves," right? I was going for a rallying cry to bring us all together.

  • yea, its all good, i understand and i do agree...just, it wouldnt surprise me that after hearing one unappealing statement after another, come time for the final point, their mind is most likely going to be utterly close minded.

    "wishing doesnt make it so"

    "he isnt, atleast evidence to show he is"

    "in the end, the truth is, all the evidence...points to there being no god..."

    i agree, but youre being quite blunt

  • Yeah, I'm being blunt, direct...can you think of a particularly compelling reason why I shouldn't? I mean, honestly...treating religious people like delicate snowflakes just because they're overly sensitive doesn't hold much appeal for me.

    What am I supposed to say? "Well, um, maybe it seems like it might, just a little bit, look like it's POSSIBLE that there just might not be a god"???

    Watch my video titled "Sticks and Stones"; I'm so done coddling religious sensitives.

  • personally, ive found that if you do sugar coat your material, you can usually get them to listen in a bit longer, and if you manipulate your words just right, you can play them into admitting what a certain situation is.

    but if youre blunt, they instantly will often inter brainwashed mode and they will just run away when they confront a specific question.

    but i dunno, thats just me...ill check out your video...good stuff

  • Your work seems to have greatly improved during the course of these videos. Well done.

  • Thanks! Let's hope you fell the same way about the fourth one.

    ...assuming I ever stop procrastinating and finish the bloody thing. Heh.

  • I am most eager to see it.

  • yay, if everyone thought like this the world would be a better place. impressive animation too

  • Thanks! :)

  • Twat

    oops :P

  • TOY STORY :)

    This vid was cute. How long does it take you to make somehting like this?

  • Anywhere from a week to a month, depending on various factors: how complicated the animation is, my personal life, etc.

  • These need WAY more views!!

  • No argument here! :)

    I'm working on a fourth episode, incidentally, then back to work on my webcomic.

  • I am looking forward to more!

    the webcomic sounds interesting too.

    Definitely subbing!

  • Awesome! Thank you! :)

  • Moar!

  • I have a few planned, but I'm also in the process of starting a webcomic, so...well, I have a lot on the spike, is all. :)

    Thanks for the enthusiasm, though! :)

  • Keep us informed on this webcomic, eh?

  • Will do; I have every intention of putting together a trailer for it to put on YouTube prior to release.

    It's, um...a little hard to explain what it's going to be. Let's just say that it's what Star Trek would have been if I were in charge...and even that's not an adequate description, really.

  • Just finished all 3 Rational Station vids. Great work! So true. I got tired of trying to explain these points - having them go in one ear and out the other. Since then, I found it personally more satisfying to do comedy about religion. So, I too, do animations. I've dabbled in Maya, but I'm impatient, so I went the 2D route. I must admit: I'm a bit jealous now. Keep up the good work! (new subscriber here)

  • Thanks! I'll check out your channel when it's not 2 in the bleedin' ayem over here, heh. :)

    Though I have no prejudice against Maya, I'm a 3DS MAXer, myself; it's what I started on.

  • Haven't they merged? Sorry if i'm wrong, i live in a hole. I personally use blender because i'm a noob and low on budget.

  • I actually don't know; I haven't really been keeping up. I don't think so, though I may be wrong.

    If you can believe it, I'm using 3DS MAX version 3.1; it's ancient but it's also LEGAL. :)

  • I love your message, it is so true.

  • Thanks; one does one's best.

    Unfortunately, the few theist types who've reacted to it don't seem to have quite understood it; clearly they and we do not speak the same language.

  • Nicely done! ★★★★★

    Katalyzt

  • I like it. :-)

  • Cool huskey stuffed animal. She does have a point about making the world better by stepping in and helping. Sure we can pray until we get gray hair or we can do something ourselves to end things like world hunger, discrimination, child prositution and human trafficing, and other stuff that hinders the progression of Mankind. I think that's the whole point or something.

  • Heck, even religion makes this point, doesn't it? "God helps those who help themselves."

    The Earth is ours and the responsibility is ours. You're absolutely right; that was a large part of the message.

  • He isn't

    :D

    Love it :)

  • One of my more blunt moments.

    Thanks. :)

  • the animation is really good, especially the lip syncing. and wishing doesn't make things true. I don't spend my days wishing there was a god, i just know that there is. certain things have shown that to me.

    good luck with the videos

  • You CAN'T "just know"; how can you be so certain that you haven't had a dream, a delusion, or are just plain mistaken? Standards of proof must be applied even in matters of faith.

  • certain things such as the unexplainability of the evolution of certain animals, the giraffe or the bombardier beetle for instance, and certain events that have taken place in my life, as well as other things.

    just don't assume that all believers wake up every day saying "i wish god is real" i don't think anyone does that. wouldn't that be something a non believer would say?

  • You've missed my point.

    The point is that even if you have faith, that doesn't make something real. Unless something can be demonstrated, one must treat all conclusions as tentative.

  • i understand your point, i just think that there is a big difference between the words 'believing' and 'wishing'.

  • In a religious context, there really ISN'T.

    For neither do you actually have objective evidence.

    For neither do you have a guarantee.

    For neither do you have anything but a feeling.

    Where exactly are you seeing a difference? Because it seems to me that religious types think their belief ought to somehow be special, in a category by itself...but there is absolutely not reason why it should be.

  • well i see a difference, because i'm not sitting here wishing for anything. hence the difference.

  • That's hardly relevant.

    The question is the TRUTH of whatever you wish for or believe in. Just because you wish for it or believe in it, that doesn't mean that it is real.

    And yet, religious types always claim that their beliefs are TRUE, that their claims are of real things...despite the fact that they provide no evidence, no proof.

    That is where wishes and faith intersect, and where they both fail.

  • This is really nifty stuff!

  • Thanks! :)

  • Excellent stuff Bionic, you're doing a great job with these. :)

  • Thanks!

    It's gonna be a while until the next one, tho; I have another project I'm gonna be working on. I actually let that one slide to do these, but it's time to get back to work on it.

  • Awesome. How many episodes are you planning?

  • This may actually be the last episode for a while; this last one took forever, I haven't decided on the next subject to tackle, and I have other projects to concentrate on. But we'll see.

  • Love it!

    Especially the way you zoomed in as she said the words "he isn't" (refering to god, not being real).Keep up the good work!

  • Thanks! :)

  • Howie look a lot less love worn in the video than in "real life"! Are you planning to do an episode a week? Keep up the good work....

  • Yes, well, fur simulation is hard, so making Howie look as he does in real life would be difficult. Heh.

    This may actually be the last episode for a while; this last one took forever, I haven't decided on the next subject to tackle, and I have other projects to concentrate on. But we'll see.

  • Why don't you have your vids in HD? It's animation, can't you scale it to whatever you want?

  • They're sized to exactly fit the YouTube window. *shrug*

  • Yeah but if you upscale it to 720p/i or 1080p/i ... I think the resolution is 1289x800 or something like that.

  • Well, maybe. But the point is really the context more than the resolution.

    And I have disk space to worry about; the raw data files that make up these vids are huge even at this size.

  • This is cool. Did you make this?

  • I did.

    I animate; it's this thing I do. ;)

  • That is very very cool. I just discovered your videos. I'm kicking myself for not having checked out your channel sooner.

  • Well, you're here now! :)

  • 1:34 DRAMATIC CAMERA ZOOM!

    Cool, as usual. And well put, and perfectly accurate. Nice to see a new environment done and modelled; I think it's even better than the last one.

    [smallvoice]... but I do so wish that toys did come to life[/smallvoice]

  • Well, c'mon...Sandra spends her entire time in this vid SITTING; if the camera didn't swirl around and zoom in like a moth on crank, people'd be going out for popcorn halfway through! :)

    An' yeah...it'd be nice if toys came to life. If you stayed after the fade-out, you noticed that Howie is real; more than a little of this vid is autobiographical. Heh.

    Thanks for the view! :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list