Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (162)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • everyone knows Hess was not treated justly. Now there are 2 options when you know that.

    1. say they all deserved abuse.

    2. feel that some wrong was done to him..

    This is why his treatment was unjust. He left when they started (before they started) to murder victims. He tried to bring peace on some level. He rebelled against Hitler in all likelihood.

    This man did not deserve what he got. But he never complaned.

    If you feel like this guy got what he deserved, please PM me.

  • Hess was a great man, and the TRUTH is that the real criminals are the people lying about the Third Reich and the great achievements they made.

    The truth, the FULL truth, will be revealed before all is over.

  • @Sinekyre14 I absolutley agree.

  • @celtic1969ireland : Jetzt haben sich Deutschlands Feinde nochmals an R.Heß gerächt.Sie haben ihn heimlich ausgeraben,verbrannt und ins Meer geworfen.= ,,Geschichtsbewältigung" in der BRD.

  • TheWhitehall Knows the score.

    Good on you.

    Got Mitt Uns.

  • @ecossembot Buddy, I don't mean to make you feel bad or look stupid, but I'm German and you made a typo, it is "Gott mit Uns" God with double-t, "with" only with one T =) Only for future reference, Heil!

  • Start of the biggest unjust kangaroo court in recorded history.

  • "These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen, and Dora, but it was demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in those camps. Attention was then moved on to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Mauthausen, Brezeznia, and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed." -- Columbia University professor Harry Elmer Barness

  • Great comments here Mcsuap1950 -- jorgeosar1990 -- DSetekh -- Great great great .....Goering said it right in his quote " The legality oph this court is in question and the hypocrisy is overwhelming!!!!"

  • Great comments -- DSetekh -- jorgeoscar1000

  • Why exactly is Hess innocent? I'm just wondering how in the world he lived until 1987.

  • Comment removed

  • @buck02111 you need to wake up sir.

  • One of the biggest lies in the history ! The "history" is written by the winners - in this case US/UK soldiers and most of Europe give their life for freedom and someone else won, someone that has made the whole war possible, someone that was a nation without a country.

    Have a nice sleep - slaves !

  • THE JUDGES IN THAT TRIAL WERE CONDUCTED STRICTLY BY THE SOVIETS.

    AND THE YANKEES WERE SOVIETS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Honestly, who the fuck is speaking in this video? I want the name of the stupid american faggot who is speaking the whole time.

  • Hess is clearly not the "Full Ticket" . A broken man. Why did he fly to Scotland in 1941? The "truth" will be hidden in archives for many more years to come.

  • @TheWhitehall Let I tell you why did he fly to scotland,because he did not want t o see line of mothers mourning over the coffins of their children and another line of children mourning over the coffins of their mothers.He was true German and tried to save Germany fighting at two fronts at same time,attacking Russia was the fatal mistake of Hitler and Hess was aware of it,his attempt was sinciere,his trial, captivity and finally murder by British secret service was worse crime against Humanity.

  • @shamidfdg "If" Herr Hess was murdered,and there is no evidence that he was, only speculation. You should be aware that the americans were on "Guard Duty" when Hess died and not the british. I agree that his life sentence was severe, for this you can point a finger at the russians who would not agree to his release. They [the russians]wanted to execute all Nuremberg defendants, including Hess.

  • @shamidfdg attacking russia was not a fatal mistake, if you were hitler, would you rather have waited for russia to attack you?!?

  • Hess was innocent , the Nuremberg judges no: the British oppressed peoples all over the world, the French above all in Algeria etc., the Americans had just completed a few decades before the genocide of the natives, the Soviets had committed more crimes than Hitler : I am really disgusted.

  • Hess had no authority from Hitler to make peace negotiations with Britain. Also any negotiations would have happened through Herman Goring or Ribbentrop the Foreign Minister not the Deputy Furher. Also cut the Conspiracy theory BS. If Hitler wanted Peace with Britain he would have ordered negotiations to begin. He certainly did not want to fight the British while fighting the russians that much is certain. However, when looking at the issue of Hess you must remember his greatly diminished powers

  • Hollywood at it's best!

    The jew Jackson strikes back, at an innocent man!

    Big show full of lies.

    No crime of the victors was to come up. Katyn was known, silence! Allied bombings of civillians and much more, horrible crimes against women and children.

    Makes me throw up.

    Next Hollywood show was in Bagdad, again, bib big show.

    Country leaders put to death.

    What an achievement, like playing god!

  • @wotansrevenge yea that is just how it is mate. if Wehrmacht had won the war we would not have heard about the war crimes from the Germans, but war crimes from the Alies, its the victors there is writing history. And they can do it the way they want to do it. there is made an American small serie called nürnberg, try to take a look at that. its werry interesting Göring is talking alot with his prison guard about this subjekt it is so interesting to listen to. its was a 2 Emmy winning show

  • What would Jesus do?

    Have a drive thru lunch at McDonalds in his Hummer, a coffee at Starbucks and

    then receive a star on Hollywood Blvd.

    Like a good american, after being born in a barn, he wanted a house, a bigger house , a much bigger house.

    Too bad, Goldman Sachs wasn't there yet., but guys with a cross and nails.

    They screwed him, big time!

  • @bobshenix

    Very true.

  • One must admire the dedication of Hess, whether you would consider him friend or foe. And taking it upon yourself to try for peace, without higher authorization, is a noble action.

  • hess flew with a document papers for peace and to end the war but was caught..... got into prison and ignore his papers and he was silence..why?? of course to continue the war.... British ignore it all coz they have their own interests also in pursuing the war.... Germans wants to end it early but British provoked it by KEEPING HESS, and after many years in prison.... he was assassinated so that SILENCE will continue

  • they ignored hess because hess had no authority to end the war. If the English had said "Hooray!" and took his arrival (in a dingy plane in the middle of scotland--kinda unofficial) as a true attempt at peacemaking by Hitler, it would have done nothing to stop the Germans from taking over the rest of europe, and indeed it would have only helped them

    not to mention it would have been enormously stupid

  • rudolf hess a nazi

  • Die Gefangenen wurden gefoltert.Diese Praxis betreiben die Amis bis heute.

  • Poo pusher nazi scum! burn in hell you motherfucker's have fun sucking satan cocks!! amen

  • @MDTC78 HEIL HITLER you shit head!!

  • Your hero hitler molested children,gave head for friendships of ww1,was caught in bed with himmlers pa,never had sex with a female over the age of 14 years old, was kicked out of art school,twice!! :) had one very empty testicle:) was not even german but was of austrian jewish heritage...fuck the list goes on and on you nazi cocksmoking stinking cunt!!! your hero shot himself like the true wimp he was! :) heil hitler all you want you fucking fool!! get a job you fucking gimp!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSER

  • @MDTC78

    you need to see a doctor. you are really sick.

  • haha you nazi scum bag :) tell your mother stop calling me!! :) eat shit :)

  • You realize that most of this trial was a "showcase". Alot of what happened was filmed with the intention that you would completely disgrace Germany by "trying" these leaders and make all of Germany accountable for what choices were made by the leadership. I would love to see Americans put on trial for many crimes they are commiting now. But then again, they would say ,"We are fighting terroism." Yeah sure boys in the south, your fighting terroism, and saying your a super power the next.

  • awesome comment

  • although I despise nazism, and it's thuggish adherents,

    you do have a point when you say many in the bush/cheney administration should be put on trial

  • Comment removed

  • the guy was in britan at this time. Did the ammericans give a fuck when they murderd 100s of thousands of japaneese civilans. 2 ATOMIC BOMBS THATS A FUCKING CRIME.What about the bombing in DRESDAN GERMANY humans are the destoryer of most human life. this is a fact we cannot deny. this is just reminder of how rethless humans can be.

  • Too bad not all responsible had their day of reckoning. Millions of Jews, Roma, homosexuals, women, and children did not have the luxury of a trial. Fair or not, at least he got one.

  • @oscarmartinez78

    But at least those most responsible did. You need to remember that genocides have occurred throughout history, even recent history... with even masterminds of these genocides getting off without serving a day in prison!!

    History is not just.

    Last century, Mao is responsible for the deaths of approx 35 million, and Stalin of 30 million total... each of THEIR OWN COUNTRYMEN! However, BECAUSE they did not lose a war, the average person today knows only of Hitler's 6 million.

  • Heil Rudolf Hess

    True hero of our race.

  • A True man of peace.

  • Comment removed

  • ha!!! und ihr glaubt die ganze theater-Vorstellung auch noch die euch die alliierten seit damals verkaufen =)

  • There's something extremely fishy about the whole Hess debacle. I would give my left eyeball to know what happened when he fled Germany for England.

  • Read 'Hess: The Missing Years' by David Irving. He was tortured with all sorts of drugs, even chemotherapy.

  • Aryan scott is lost. Hitler pretended to want peace but each and every time he offered peace he was secretly planning for war. Each time he faked an attack on German troops or properties in order to retaliate against the peoples he wanted to conquer. If you want a true reflection of what happened read: The Rise and fall of the Third Reich by William Shirrer.

  • The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich by William Shirer?!

    Of all the books composed of false history you mentioned the worst of all!

    Read David Irving's books, based on PRIMARY research, not wartime propanganda or rumour!

    There is absolutely NO proof for your ridiculous claims!

  • Comment removed

  • Again I say stop thinking with your hate and learn the real history!!! I am sorry that you can not see past your hate. I hope one day you can get past it.

  • I've learned REAL history. There has not been one ounce of 'hate' in my comments on this board, just solid refutation of your liberal & communist propaganda.

  • I suggest you read AJP Taylors Origins of The Second WW, David Hoggan's The Forced War or David Irving's Churchill's War.

    Stop peddaling your schoolastic political indoctrination.

  • lol 'schoolastic'

    neo nazi intelligence fail

  • One of the greatest injustices of the 20th century. Rudolf Hess was an ambassador for peace, and was imprisoned for it.

    He should have been set free. But then again, Churchill & Roosevelt should have accepted Hitler's very generous final peace treaty of 194O.

    Churchill & FDR plunged the world into the catastrophe that became WWII.  Had they accepted Hitler's peace, Poland (and Slovakia) would have been independant and Communism would have been destroyed before 1950.

  • I really think you need to learn more history!

  • And why is that then? None of what i stated in my previous message is historically incorrect.

  • Most of what you said was incorrect! Hitler broke many treatys. You need to think with you head and not your hate!

  • None of what i said was incorrect.

    Hitler was the one who presented the 1934 German-Polish 10 year peace treaty. Poland broke it with their aggressive stance and partial mobilization in early 1939.

    Britain broke the 1935 Naval Agreement.

    Germany were not part of the League of Nations. Germany, more than any other nation, adhered to the Geneva convention. Germany was unjustly punished by the Versailles Treaty

    YOUR pseudo-history is derived from anti-Germanic hate!

  • Ha! Ha! Ha! Poland broke the peace with Germany "with their aggressive stance"? Are you for real? Poland's army was NOTHING compared to Germany's and they knew it. During the German invasion of Poland (remember "lebensraum"?), the Poles were throwing cavalry equipped with machine guns at panzers.

    Read "The Ciano Diaries" by Count Galeazzo Ciano,. Mussolini's son-in-law and Foreign Minister. He documented German duplicity against the Poles and others (including Italians).

  • The size and strength of the armies is irrelevant. Most of the Wehrmacht was made up of cavalry at the time too!

    Poland were all for ceding Danzig to Germany until they got their assurance from England. Then Beck got too big for his boots and decided that with England he could defeat Germany.

    Had the great Marshal Pilsudski still have been Polish leader, there would have been no Polish-German war.

  • "The size and strength of the armies is irrelevant"? What pot are you smoking? What IS relevant? The Soviets defeated the Germans through nothing but sheer force of numbers.

    Poland "was all for ceding Danzig" not because they wanted to get rid of the place (they didn't), but because until the UK decided they had had enough of Hitler's naked land grabs, the Poles felt boxed in (remember they had their backs to the Russians, their former and (hopefully) future rulers?).

    (cont'd)

  • Poland was all for ceding Danzig because they acknowledged the animosity of the Versailles treaty and because they already had a sea port - Gdynnia (spelling could be wrong), AND they didn't have any allies.

  • Poland was only "all for ceding Danzig" in your neo-Nazi dreams.

  • Read Dr Hoggan's book The Forced War, an also seek out original diplomatic correspondence from the time.

  • Your last comment about Marshal Pilsudski is a fallacious argument (specifically an Historian's fallacy), since you have absolutely no way of knowing how he would have handled that situation and you know it.

  • Under Pilsudski the Poles and Germans secured an Anti-Aggression Treaty. Pilsudski's politics were very closely aligned with those of Hitler's (including evacuating the Jews from Poland).

    If you had read about pre-war Polish-German relations, you would know this. Had Dmowski been in power (who was pro-Soviet), you may have been correct.

  • Ahh, but I have read about pre-war Polish-German relations, in depth, in fact. You're either guilty of being ignorant or else disingenuous in presenting your "facts" about Pilsudski.

    For starters, wanting to expel Jews from Poland did NOT make Pilsudski's politics "closely aligned" with Hitler's. Pilsudski signed non-aggression pacts with BOTH the USSR & Germany because Poland was stuck between them and he desired to strengthen its position relative to them.

    (cont'd)

  • As have i. That may be the case, but it glosses over the fact that Pilsudski was pro-German and anti-USSR.

  • I'm curious as to how you came to the conclusion that Marshal Pilsudski was pro-German. Really. Have you ever heard of a man named Conrad Grieb? He was a German-American author (and unabashed Nazi sympathizer) who self-published a book called "American Manifest Destiny and the Holocausts." Like your David Hoggan, he took the position that Hitler was basically a "man of peace" and that WW2 was forced upon him by a sinister cabal composed of Churchill, Roosevelt, et al.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 2)

    Unlike you, however, he took the position that Marshal Pilsudski was NOT in any sense a friend of Hitler or Germany's and in fact conspired with the allied powers to destroy Hitler. I met Mr. Grieb (and obtained an autographed copy of his book) shortly before his death. Did you know he was personal friends with Charles LIndbergh?

    In my youth I was a member of "the movement" and met a number of personages on both sides of the fence including David Duke.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 3)

    I met Davey at Farchers Grove in Union, NJ in 1988 when he was "running" for president. I was also at one time a member of his NAAWP (before his arrest for embezzling their funds to support his gambling habit).

    I'm just telling you all this so you know I'm not some dope off the street who believes everything THEY throw my way. At one time I was an organizer for the now defunct Populist Party of America.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 4)

    OK, enough about me. As for your David Hoggan? A number of noted historians have problems with his later theses about Hitler and Nazi Germany. I won't mention Deborah Lipstadt because I have a funny feeling you won't be interested in anything a Jewish author has to say.

    Instead I'll mention noted West German historian Andreas Hillgruber, himself a Wehrmacht war veteran, who admitted that Hoggan was correct in his assertion that Hitler did not believe....

    (cont'd)

  • Lipstadt? LOL. Did you slip into alzheimers after  meeting Greip?

    Of all the historical falsifiers she has to be the queen! Hilgruber is also a falsifier.

  • I'm not going to comment on Lipstadt because as I guessed, you wouldn't be interested in ANYTHING a Jewish historian had to say (surprise! surprise!).

    What evidence do you have that Hillgruber is a "falsifier"?

    By the way, NUMEROUS historians accuse your boy Hoggan of being a "falsifier" due to his BLATANT ties with neo-Nazi groups and the FACT he conveniently glosses over facts that contradict his theses.

    You can't just dismiss someone out of hand without providing a valid reason.

  • It's nothing to do with the fact she's a Jew. She states to her 'students' she has seen "actual blueprints of Auschwitz that clearly highlight homicidal gas chambers", which is a complete lie - no such piece exists, nor ever has.

    I have spoken about Dr David L. Hoggan to others over the years and NEVER have i heard about the accusations you make.

    It is no coincidence that the same lies have been levelled at David irving for publishing the truth.

  • (part 5)

    that invading Poland would trigger a violent response from France and the UK (a fact confirmed, by the way, by Count Galeazzo Ciano, Mussolini's Foreign Minister & son-in-law, in his diaries).

    However, Hillgruber parted ways with Hoggan in stating Hitler CATEGORICALLY wished to invade Poland all along (a fact confirmed by the Hossbach Memorandum and again, by Galeazzo Ciano, who stated von Ribbentrop & Hitler both in private talks with him just before the invasion....

    (cont'd)

  • Due to it's nature, the Hossbach Memorandum is very unreliable.

    Hitler knew from the beginning that war would eventually be forced on Germany, due to his 'challenging' of their global economic superiority.

    The Molotov-Ribbentrop treaty was signed becuase he did not think England would be crazy enough to declare war on a Germany allied with the USSR.

    So, by signing the non-aggression pact, he was sure he had prevented a global war.

  • And the Hossbach Memorandum is very unreliable how?

    Of course, Hitler's desire for "lebensraum" in Eastern Europe would have had NOTHING to do with war being "forced" on Germany.

    Actually the Molotov-Ribbentrop treaty was signed because Hitler knew Russia (now the USSR) had a historical claim to Poland and did not want to risk a war with them (at that time).

  • The Hossbach Memorandum was a certified photocopy of a microfilm copy of a retyped certified true copy prepared by an American of a retyped certified true copy prepared by a German of unauthenticated hand-written notes by Hossbach, written 5 days after a discussion led by Hitler.

    'Lebenscruam was about reclaiming the Eastern lands ("Ostland" as stated in Mein Kampf) taken from Germany by the vicious Versailles Treaty.

    Your opinion on the R-M treaty is wrong. Why would he wait til 1939?!

  • One problem with your definition of "lebensraum": the doctrine actually predates Hitler's coming to power in Germany by a number of years. It was apparently first coined by Friedrich Ratzel at the end of the 19th century. It was actually a commonly held idea among German peoples during WW1 and after. Even A.J.P. Taylor admits this in the book "The Origins of the Second World War."

    Numerous historians have pointed this out. It was hardly a secret belief among Germans.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 2)

    One of the reasons why the validity of the Hossbach Memorandum is not seriously questioned is the actions of the Third Reich followed it closely (German invasions of Poland & the USSR). You could be right, but given Germany's conduct in those areas it's moot in any event.

    You think the Versailles Treaty was "vicious"? Ever wonder why? Ever read the Treaty of Frankfurt? Paybacks are a bitch, so they say.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 3)

    My "opinion" of the Ribbentrop-Molotov treaty is based on the writings of Count Galeazzo Ciano, who knew Ribbentrop personally and was an eyewitness to events.  It is widely known that Stalin viewed Eastern Europe as a Soviet (Russian) sphere of influence.

    Why would he wait until 1939? Many are asking why he didn't wait longer! Germany was not the economic powerhouse many thing it was in 1939. It was resource-poor. Ciano documents this in his diaries,

    (cont'd)

  • (part 4)

    Also read the book "The Wages of Destruction: the Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy" by Adam Tooze. Germany was not ready to wage real war until 1939 at the earliest, as records show. While Hitler didn't believe the UK or France would declare war when he invaded Poland he didn't trust the USSR. He wasn't THAT big a fool!

    One more thing: did you know at least two noted historians accused YOUR boy David Hoggan of forging his own documents?

    (cont'd)

  • Well, they would do, wouldn't they? He, after all, hasn't 'towed the line' so to speak.

  • One of the historians who accused Hoggan of forgery produced an exampe ot if. It seems Hoggan forged a statement by Neville Chamberlain that turned out to be untrue when compared to actual records. All this is documented.

  • Why would one forge a statement from a staesman, whom so many know so much about. ANYONE can access the statements of Mr Chamberlain.

  • Someone should have told that to your boy Hoggan. Here's the forged example Gerhard Weinberg used in his famous vitriolic diatribe with David Hoggan to discredit him.

    Der Erzwungene Krieg pages 104-105 from The American Historical Review, Volume 68, No. 1, October 1962 page 104

    Fact: David Hoggan wrote a statement he claimed Neville Chamberlain made which he never did. By the way, quotes erroneously ascribed to famous people are often made. You should know that.

  • I'm aware of the 'diatribe in Der Speigel. Hoggan had just as much to say about Weinberg. There may be very small errors in such books, but the facts that uphold the general statement of the books remain.

  • (part 5)

    Gerhard Weinberg showed how Hoggan deliberately changed a statment Neville Chamberlain made on Poland and Helmut Krausnick went even futher dismissing many of his allegations as unwarranted.

    Finally, were you aware that many have charged your boy David Irving based his bio. of Joseph Goebbels on records that have since been shown to be Soviet forgeries?

  • Incorrect. David Irving has confirmed that the diaries HE used were the real deal. And he should know, with 50 years experience in the archival field.

    They're going to use absolutely any methods whatsoever to discredit and ridicule the purveyors of the truth.

  • I'm curious. How exactly did Irving confirm the diaries he used were not forgeries? Isn't this the same David Irving who originally claimed the alleged Hitler diaries were forgeries, then reversed himself a week later (I remember when this happened), then reversed himself again after it was finally revealed they were in fact, forgeries? Face it: the man has zero credibility.

  • Absolute nonsense. The ink and paper can be dated and verified. These are the techniques used on behalf of Mr Irving. These same techniques have also dicredited the Anne Frank 'diaries'.

    Stop living in denial.

  • The only one living in denial is you. You never answered my question. Please leave a link on my profile that shows exactly how Irving confirmed the Goebbels diaries he used were genuine, or else leave me a bibliographic source if you have no link.

    You also never addressed the issue I raised about Irving, mainly his inability to decide whether or not the Hitler diaries were genuine (we both know now they were forgeries). It seems Irving's tactics mirror those you decry.

  • You are really splitting hairs now. Mr Irving has insisted those diaries - which Hugh Trevoe Roper claimed were genuine - were fakes. Again, Irving has made very small, trivial mistakes in his books from time to time, but again - the fundamental facts still remain and are not compromised. Have you even read Churchill's War or The Forced War? These books are +1000 pages, with EVERY source noted and transcribed.

  • (part 2)

    By the way, it has been my observation that pro-Nazi "historians" are just as likely to use "absolutely any methods whatsoever to discredit and ridicule" their opponents. Argumentum ad hominem is a tool used by everyone when it suits them. That's why I ignore personal attacks and only try to weigh the evidence. You should do this as well, if you're really interested in the truth, anyway.

  • I agree with the sentiments you make. However, these are not the tactics of such historians, these tactics are to be found in the works of Shirer, Evans, Rosenbaum, Lipstadt, Hillgruber, Fest etc. There careers are based on lies. Why? Becuase, if they want careers, they have to be. David Irving lost his entire personal fortune standing up for the truth. Others, such as Zundel and Rudolf have even been jailed for it.

  • You agree with the "sentiments" I make pro-Nazi historians being just as likely to distort history & engage in smear tactics, then you flatly deny your boys make them. So which is it?

    I'm going to be on vacation for about a week. I'd appreciate it if you could find that info. I requested. In the meantime, did you ever look into what I gave you about Pilsudski?

  • I agree that he tactics you speak of are disagreeable, however, these are not the tactics of what you carelessly call "pro-Nazi" historians. These are the tactics of 'historians' with an agenda, namely ensuring their bank accounts are kept fat and their 'reputations' are maintained.

    You should take a look at the work of Germar Rudolf too, if you can bear to open your eyes that wide.

    v

    h

    o

    .

    o

    r

    g

  • By the way, I don't mean to nitpick, but you never told me how you arrived at the conclusion Pilsudski was "pro-German" esp. after I told you I met a pro-Hitler historian (Conrad Grieb) who insisted in his book the man was ANTI-HITLER.

  • (part 6)

    of Poland made it quite clear they were uninterested in a diplomatic solution to the problem when one was still available.

    It is getting late. I promised you I would give you a list of sources, and I shall. Tomorrow I'll be on again and I promise I'll give you a list, but not here. I hate typing here. I'll post it on the comments section of your profile. I hate the limited amount of space here.

  • (part 2)

    This, by the way, is also why he signed an alliances with France & Romania. He vocalized his disappointment with France's & the UK's policy of appeasement with Hitler. He also knew the pacts he signed with Germany & the USSR were only as good as the paper they were signed on and wouldn't endure (I can send you bibliographic source material from reputable sources on this).

    Pilsudski was KNOWN to disdain Hitler and refused offers of a military alliance with Germany.

    (cont'd)

  • Yes, i would very much like to know of your source.

  • (part 3)

    Unlike Mussolini, who was a fool, Pilsudski was shrewd enough to know forming an alliance with Germany would immediately jeopardize Poland's independence. Even Ciano, Mussolini's Foreign Minister (and son-in-law) was outspokenly against the "Pact of Steel" because after 1938 he realized HItler could not be trusted.

    Pilsudski was also KNOWN to have actively sought a military alliance with the UK to offset Germany.

    (cont'd)

  • (part 4)

    A lot of people rip into Pilsudski for signing the pacts with Hitler and Stalin, but given the political reality of the time he really didn't have any choice. France & the UK were too busy trying to appease Hitler to offer any real guarantee of support, and Romania just wasn't strong enough.

    Ciano wrote how the leaders of BOTH Hungary & Romania privately confided in him their deep mistrust of Hitler. By 1938 it was pretty obvious what kind of man your boy was.

    (cont'd)

  • part 5

    Finally, you are both correct (and incorrect) that Poland didn't have any allies. On paper, they did (France & Romania). In fact, they didn't.

    Thus, Poland under Pilsudski had its back to the wall and was buying for time, hoping for an alliance with the UK.

    I'm still waiting for you to reply to what I wrote about the Wehrmacht. By the way, if you really believe the size & strenth of armies is "irrelevant," you know nothing about warfare.

  • *strength

  • (part 3)

    Finally, the Wehrmacht cavalry went into Poland supported by stukas and panzers. What did the Polish army have in comparison?

  • Why should Roosevelt accept a peace treaty? The US was not at war with Germany in 1940? What?

  • Read Charles C. Tansill's 'Back Door To War'. Rossevelt was central to the war before 1940.

  • Yes, I know, we had to support the U.K. Nothing new there.

  • The fires were started in the ovens in the presence of Senior Engineer Prufer, representative of the contractors of the firm of Topf and Sons, Erfurt, they are working most satisfactorily. The planks from the concrete cellar used as a mortuary could not yet be removed on account of the frost. This is, however, not very important, as the gassing cellar [Vergasungskeller] can be used for that purpose. (2)

  • Karl Bischoff, the Chief Architect of Auschwitz wrote in a letter dated 29 January 1943, about a gassing cellar in Crematorium II,

    The crematorium has been completed save for minor construction work by the use of all the forces available, in spite of unspeakable difficulties, the severe cold, and in 24 hour shifts.

  • From this day on,the jews came up with the scheme to collect money they need from Germany to built 3 years latter the racist zionist state of Israel,dumping the Palestinian to the corner!!!

  • deutschland ueber alles,lange lebe adolf hitler...fuck the usa

  • Fuck you .Canadien -American wannabe!

  • you can go to hell im not a wannabe,im acctually a born canadian and great grandfathers are all german.....

  • Comment removed

  • fuck off

  • what about presscot bush,this fucking judges know bush was invlvev too

  • Kangaroo court

  • your right everything was stolen from germany and got the usa on the moon,now the usa will give it to china free of charge

  • Its amazing you inbreads criticize the German's for everything, but the technology you use today are stolen from Germany after the war. everything you use can be traced back to Germany.

    Ask the CIA what tactics they use when spy on you and other countries. Ask the US airforce were they got their flying tactics from and still use today. Were did the US get the Technology to put man on the moon do I need to go on (well at least into low orbit). Get you facts right before you talk shit.

  • no one is criticizing germany!Hitler maybe!German soldiers for the most part just did there duty for country.Peace from america!

  • You are all bunch of fucked up American Morons, read your history, America and Germany where alias until 1942. America supplied and financed Germany. America did not want to enter the war nor it had any interest. America was more concerned with Japan. Pressure was from the UK which forced the US into the war.

    The Nuremberg trials where a farce all the evidence where false or beaten into confession.

  • Read YOUR history: The day after Pearl Harbor (Dec 8th) the United States declared war on Japan. On Dec. 11th, 1941, Germany and Italy declared war on the U.S.

  • We Are not all fucked up morons,Germany is our allie,If hitler had not declared war on us ,we would not have entered war.

  • Rofl.

  • "The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration."

    - Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, October 20, 1933.

    nuff said

  • Not entirely true. The US were supplying Britain with armament and supplies up until 1941, Roosevelt and Churchill were close before the war. Roosevelt desperately wanted to aid Britain in joining the war, but the American people were against the war and Joseph Kennedy US Ambassador to Britain advised Roosevelt to negotiate with Germany. It is true that a few major US corperations wanted to trade with the Nazis, and the US Nazi party was a small but growing party pre-war.

  • and let's just make it clear i hate those nazi fags hitler is burning in hell right now!

  • i don't think it fair that america got the biggest hand in this considering they came in 3 fucking years late when the war was already turning

  • Hang the mother!#¤#"#%

  • to all of those who put racist and nazi comments here.. i have one statement to make.. FUCK YOU ALL YOU NAZI LOVERS. YOU SHOULD BE ALL HANGED LIKE THESE GUYS.

  • Rudolf Hess is in Valhalla. Death to all commie scum

  • AND PS: he fooled them pretending be insane lol

    Hess:

    Jackson: 0

  • The scandal that resulted in his lifelong imprisonment and suspicious death should not be forgotten.

  • hess was a coward

  • He flew over the canal, performed his first parachute ever to offer the british peace. As a "thank you" they imprissoned him for 40 years never sseing his newborn son. I wouldnt call that "cowardice".

  • There is no point in an honest man recalling

    the past truthfully to a bunch of filthy liars!

  • they poisoned him with drugs..

  • hess got strangled, most propably by the british according to his son.

  • i mean before trial..

  • Why why should england and american be the judge ? doing the trial

  • How stupid would you feel if your country let war criminals go because you deferred prosecution to a random nation like Ecuador? There was no true fair way to have unbiased judgements handed out, but it worked out right none the less.

  • because was england and america who fought to the very end of the war and they were the only countries who had a normal democracy in that time... soviet union was in no condition to accuse anyone because they're country was governated by a facist to... that's my opinion. so what's your point when youre asking that question? you're trying to say that these nazi pigs wouldnt deserved this? you're sick man...

  • and you are a perfect stereotype of a dumbed down american. congratz =)

  • Rudolf Hess is hero of world war 2

  • and you are a fucking racist pig motherfucker nazi scumbag.. go fuck yourself you fucking nazi lover!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more