I have made these before with a somewhat reliable success rate and I have found that extremely fine hardwood charcoal works well for longer sparks. Hope I help, cheers.
Check out the senko's I made by searching on this site for 'gemini senko hanabi'. I was able to make this standardized device work 5 times in a row! And with pine-soot sparks!
@Heliman96 No, I've forgotten about them. I put weeks of work into trying to make them consistent enough for a video and never figured it out. I may try again in the coming months.
I am failing at my sparklers. I followed the recipe on your website, and when i tried to burn it, it burned rather odd. It bubbled and then burst into sparks. So, i took a small strip of a napkin, and made a line of the composition. It burst into flames and just burned away. But when it finished burning, thats when the little ember ball formed.
So then, i tried many times to place an amount of composition on a piece of napkin, and then, left a little blank spot and then added more composition. This way, it would burst into flames, go out, form the slag ball, and then react with the remaining composition.i tried this many times, and failed. everytime i tried to modify it a bit, but it still wont work. any tips?
The ratio needs to be tinkered with over and over again to get it right for the exact chemicals you are using. For me, I had to often let the composition burn, then blow on the remaining red core for the ball to form. I plan on doing many more experiments and refining the ratio for an upcoming video.
I actually read that they are much more reliable when using realgar, but who wants to risk their health to make and burn a few sparklers?!? I mean, If it were an ariel shell, that's one thing... but I'd rather not risk my lungs to arsenic poisoning just to see a few sparks. Still, I read that when they DO work perfectly, They are reguarded as one of the most beautiful sparklers in the world...
I don't know what i am doing wrong. I take a small piece of normal facial tissue, insert the composition as described in the skylighter newsletter, and when i light it, it goes "whoooosh" and then its done. I tried changing the composition a bit and i also tried changing the amount of composition i use in each sparkler, but i still cant get it right! Could someone please help me?
Both the composition and the design are very hard to get right. I changed the composition shown in the Skylighter newsletter more than 100 times before it worked for me. I used MUCH more sulfur than the original. Nearly to the point where it wouldn't burn. If I remember correctly I also added a pinch of sodium bicarbonate to slow the burn. A tutorial for sparklers is on my to do list, I may throw in one about senko hanabi's as well.
Yes I quite like these. Though I never took the time to make them as reliable as I would like, I have had more spectacular results than any others I have seen.
nnuuuuurrrr,i tried it and came up with a pretty bad result,for one i put in way to much composition making the glob always fall off,for two,i made my own sort of design and replaced those pops and strems at the end with all charcoal composition
i meant the compoistion wasnt normal,it had sulfur in it,what i meant by "all charcoal"was that it was all charcoal sparks,if you see what i mean,i will place it up in a coupla minutes
I only vaguely remember the chemistry. Something to do with the charcoal reacting with what would be molten potassium sulfide? Thanks for your comment
I tried these (video to come soon) but I also failed. (although each failure is a step to success) It seems that I did get a ball to form right away, but too much comp (or not enough) often made it fall off. I ended up with about twice as much Potassium Nitrate KNO3, and about 25% more Sulfur than the published amounts in Skylighter #100. I think my tissue paper may contribute too much C12 to the mix. I did not use soot however and my sparks were few. Still working on it though.
Did yours form a ball and start sparking before burning all the way to the end? Mine always seem to burn all the way up and then the ball will form after all the fuel is spent.
I think you are using too much mix-I read somewhere that the optimum amount is about 90 milligrams of mix in a sparkler, more than that and it will slow down, less than that and it will burn in bursts. nice job anyway, good luck
i know its not like a fuse but im jsut sayin it would be cool if u could figure out a way to use one as a delay(was also wondering if u used any magnesium to make this, IM askin cuz someone told me that u ned a lot of magnesium to make but i cant get any right now)
Wtg !! those are a Bi@#& to make and you did a super job. Fact is most fireworks manafactures in China wont make them because they are so hard to make.
That bead is only achievable with my current composition when you blow on the thing for about 30 seconds to get it going. I've been working all night trying to perfect the formula to no success. A lot of hours down the drain. My current formula contains both its fair share of iron oxide and baking soda, both as an effort to slow the burn. I came close but still it's not near perfect. Tonight I have been attempting to attain the effect using only the original ingredients, but it seems hopeless.
That misses the point of these sparklers. The way these work is only compatible with high sulfur content BP type compositions. It is not just an everyday sparkler.
Ya. My formula is wayyy off from the one Skylighter advertised.... Though I still follow the rule of using more sulfur and coarse charcoal... Mine aren't the greatest either. Yours look pretty damn good though. Nice job!
Thanks. Yeah I have done the same thing with the ratios. You have to remember how many I held up at the beginning of the video, and how many I showed...just the one. I also tried 5 or 6 more that I do not show, though a couple did work pretty well but the camera wasn't focused right.
I find I need to blow on them from the bottom up until the ball is fully formed, then they have a better chance of working.
i was able to buy some commercially made ones. ive found you need a really steady hand for these to work right
41Zman 7 months ago
i just saw these in Yankee-Kun & Megane-Chan and thought.. what the hell is the bulb on the end... and now i know.
AkaiVash 10 months ago
I have made these before with a somewhat reliable success rate and I have found that extremely fine hardwood charcoal works well for longer sparks. Hope I help, cheers.
2Lazy2ThinkOfSomthin 10 months ago
Check out the senko's I made by searching on this site for 'gemini senko hanabi'. I was able to make this standardized device work 5 times in a row! And with pine-soot sparks!
Pyrotechnical Greets,
Frederick
joetjoebfred 1 year ago
i made some today!
busyhands94 1 year ago
wau :) thatˇs nice
Vr6godlike 2 years ago
u should put some smaller ones in a shell
nightcreep20 2 years ago
how do you make thoese
MrStein10 2 years ago
A guide is on my to do list for the somewhat near future..
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
@Nighthawkinlight
exactly how far in the future?
emitman85 1 year ago
@emitman85 Further than I intended. I have experimented many times with these and am yet to find a way to make them simple enough to make a tutorial.
Nighthawkinlight 1 year ago
@Nighthawkinlight 2years later.. Is there a tutorial yet? Please reply
Heliman96 3 weeks ago
@Heliman96 No, I've forgotten about them. I put weeks of work into trying to make them consistent enough for a video and never figured it out. I may try again in the coming months.
Nighthawkinlight 2 weeks ago
Ok....
I am failing at my sparklers. I followed the recipe on your website, and when i tried to burn it, it burned rather odd. It bubbled and then burst into sparks. So, i took a small strip of a napkin, and made a line of the composition. It burst into flames and just burned away. But when it finished burning, thats when the little ember ball formed.
ChemXu 2 years ago
So then, i tried many times to place an amount of composition on a piece of napkin, and then, left a little blank spot and then added more composition. This way, it would burst into flames, go out, form the slag ball, and then react with the remaining composition.i tried this many times, and failed. everytime i tried to modify it a bit, but it still wont work. any tips?
ChemXu 2 years ago
The ratio needs to be tinkered with over and over again to get it right for the exact chemicals you are using. For me, I had to often let the composition burn, then blow on the remaining red core for the ball to form. I plan on doing many more experiments and refining the ratio for an upcoming video.
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
Alright, thanks! I look foward to the video.
ChemXu 2 years ago
@Nighthawkinlight
I actually read that they are much more reliable when using realgar, but who wants to risk their health to make and burn a few sparklers?!? I mean, If it were an ariel shell, that's one thing... but I'd rather not risk my lungs to arsenic poisoning just to see a few sparks. Still, I read that when they DO work perfectly, They are reguarded as one of the most beautiful sparklers in the world...
japanesepoptart 1 year ago
I don't know what i am doing wrong. I take a small piece of normal facial tissue, insert the composition as described in the skylighter newsletter, and when i light it, it goes "whoooosh" and then its done. I tried changing the composition a bit and i also tried changing the amount of composition i use in each sparkler, but i still cant get it right! Could someone please help me?
marine12320backup 2 years ago
Both the composition and the design are very hard to get right. I changed the composition shown in the Skylighter newsletter more than 100 times before it worked for me. I used MUCH more sulfur than the original. Nearly to the point where it wouldn't burn. If I remember correctly I also added a pinch of sodium bicarbonate to slow the burn. A tutorial for sparklers is on my to do list, I may throw in one about senko hanabi's as well.
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
Ok, i'll try adding more sulfur and adding a tiny bit of NaHCO3. Thanks for all of your help!
marine12320backup 2 years ago
I read about these in Shimizu's book too--very interesting art form. Nice to finally see one in action (even if it isn't performing as you want.)
MadBassist1432 2 years ago
Yes I quite like these. Though I never took the time to make them as reliable as I would like, I have had more spectacular results than any others I have seen.
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
Very, very cool!
MadBassist1432 2 years ago
What ratios did you use for this? Is there a website that tells what i need to make them?
TheUnforgivn17 2 years ago
Look in the Skylighter newsletter archive.
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
nnuuuuurrrr,i tried it and came up with a pretty bad result,for one i put in way to much composition making the glob always fall off,for two,i made my own sort of design and replaced those pops and strems at the end with all charcoal composition
pyrogeniuses 2 years ago
Sulfur is a crucial part of the reaction.
Nighthawkinlight 2 years ago
i meant the compoistion wasnt normal,it had sulfur in it,what i meant by "all charcoal"was that it was all charcoal sparks,if you see what i mean,i will place it up in a coupla minutes
pyrogeniuses 2 years ago
Gotta admit, those are pretty neat there Nighthawk. I was reading shimizu's book on how those work, interesting chemistry going on there. good job
Swervedriver71 3 years ago
I only vaguely remember the chemistry. Something to do with the charcoal reacting with what would be molten potassium sulfide? Thanks for your comment
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
hi night ! did you used the thick tolet paper for the rolling ?
vess25 3 years ago
No I use the paper from a party streamer. It is nice because it is fire retardant and the flames will not continue up it to burn your fingers.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
how do you make it?
TTEREVE 3 years ago
What is the bigest shell or firework u ave ever made
skaterboyyo 3 years ago
My 5" sun and planets shells are about the largest I've made so far.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
can you make a tut on these?
TTEREVE 3 years ago
You an find a good tutorial about these in the Skylighter newsletter archives.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
I tried these (video to come soon) but I also failed. (although each failure is a step to success) It seems that I did get a ball to form right away, but too much comp (or not enough) often made it fall off. I ended up with about twice as much Potassium Nitrate KNO3, and about 25% more Sulfur than the published amounts in Skylighter #100. I think my tissue paper may contribute too much C12 to the mix. I did not use soot however and my sparks were few. Still working on it though.
Jwdrummer5 3 years ago
wats the comp for thes?
gobidee 3 years ago
The starting composition is found in skylighter newsletter 100 which can be found on their website.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
KNO3 54 S 28 Soot 12 Charcoal 6
joetjoebfred 3 years ago
great 5* always
pyrofun3 3 years ago
Did yours form a ball and start sparking before burning all the way to the end? Mine always seem to burn all the way up and then the ball will form after all the fuel is spent.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
ratios plz
KooKooCow 3 years ago
I think you are using too much mix-I read somewhere that the optimum amount is about 90 milligrams of mix in a sparkler, more than that and it will slow down, less than that and it will burn in bursts. nice job anyway, good luck
nirvanafan833 3 years ago
That could be, however I thought of that when testing and tried a great variety of amounts. This is the only amount I've had success with.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
ya know i could use sometin like that for a delay fuse how u make it?
heffyjustin1 3 years ago
It does not work anything like a fuse so you are out of luck there. Try black match.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
i know its not like a fuse but im jsut sayin it would be cool if u could figure out a way to use one as a delay(was also wondering if u used any magnesium to make this, IM askin cuz someone told me that u ned a lot of magnesium to make but i cant get any right now)
heffyjustin1 3 years ago
It is to fragile for a delay. No magnesium isn't used in these.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
ok thanks for the info anyway
heffyjustin1 3 years ago
did you use the sulfur based comp or the realgar based comp
theartilerysheller1 3 years ago
Sulfur. Realgar is far to toxic and hard to come by to warrant it's use in a hand held device.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
Wtg !! those are a Bi@#& to make and you did a super job. Fact is most fireworks manafactures in China wont make them because they are so hard to make.
Earl
sarahtvnm 3 years ago
Thank you
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
you should make one with diffirent colors that would be cool xD..
progamerxt 3 years ago
skylighter,cannonfuse,and pyrocreations are all good websites cept cannonfuse dosnt have instructions on things
pyrogeniuses 3 years ago
actually cannanfuse is one of my favourite informational sites. just click 'pyro info' near the top.
etshim0 3 years ago
your right thx
pyrogeniuses 3 years ago
That is the composition I began working with.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
what would you say would be the hardest firework ever to make?
pyrogeniuses 3 years ago
A large girandola.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
what?lol
pyrogeniuses 3 years ago
It is a large spinning assembly made of rockets. Look it up on youtube.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
k thx lol
pyrogeniuses 3 years ago
5/5 great video
noodle1289 3 years ago
lol they look like over sized joints ROFL/ but the sparklers are cool
danvidio 3 years ago
Looks like the slightest breeze might take away the Senko Hanabi effect but you did achieve that molten drop of slag Harry talks about.
Very nicely done.
poprocz 3 years ago
That bead is only achievable with my current composition when you blow on the thing for about 30 seconds to get it going. I've been working all night trying to perfect the formula to no success. A lot of hours down the drain. My current formula contains both its fair share of iron oxide and baking soda, both as an effort to slow the burn. I came close but still it's not near perfect. Tonight I have been attempting to attain the effect using only the original ingredients, but it seems hopeless.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
They're pretty good sparklers even though you're not that happy with them. These are the sort of fireworks that take a long time to get right.
MaTTdeluca14 3 years ago
calm down with the challenges:)no no, im kidding, they look cool even when you say your not that happy with the comp
kno3dude 3 years ago
I will be making a few more attempts tonight. We'll see how it goes. Consistency is the problem.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
Try this ratio:
22g BaNO3
3g aluminium powder, fine
9g Iron powder
2g Mg, powdered.
Then bind it with red gum.
I have had the same problem with the sparklers we made in school, I addded some more iron powder and Mg, to make the reaction more hot.*
The Result was a very very big sparkler, with very dense sparks
BackjardPyrotechnics 3 years ago
That misses the point of these sparklers. The way these work is only compatible with high sulfur content BP type compositions. It is not just an everyday sparkler.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
there supost to do that
pyroboytodumax 3 years ago
lol look nice
simonmic001 3 years ago
Nice one, I'll have to try those. 5*
kcnkickthecat 3 years ago
No disapointment to me.
5*
dezenogniet19842006 3 years ago
nice man
zink905 3 years ago
Ya. My formula is wayyy off from the one Skylighter advertised.... Though I still follow the rule of using more sulfur and coarse charcoal... Mine aren't the greatest either. Yours look pretty damn good though. Nice job!
frogy1752 3 years ago
Thanks. Yeah I have done the same thing with the ratios. You have to remember how many I held up at the beginning of the video, and how many I showed...just the one. I also tried 5 or 6 more that I do not show, though a couple did work pretty well but the camera wasn't focused right.
I find I need to blow on them from the bottom up until the ball is fully formed, then they have a better chance of working.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
stick those in a shell it would look so cool
MonkeyDog500 3 years ago
Yes it sure would, unfortunately they need to be perfectly still to work.
Nighthawkinlight 3 years ago
aww man that sux
MonkeyDog500 3 years ago