Added: 1 year ago
From: guitjimi65
Views: 10,316
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wait that was a race? lol the little jap car got its headlights sucked out

  • man that Mach-1 is one bad bitch. Sounds good man. My only dispute with ford regarding the mach-1 is that they didnt really give it a definitive more agressive look from the rest, none the less still one bad bitch you got there. Take good care of her.

  • &DJSlurp1200 Well Said...i also prefer ford btw.

  • @chughes44 Im sure it is...truck vs car. Im talking motors only, put the 383 in the 240 lol

  • @turbofb24 In the real world hp/liter doesnt mean shit. Sure its an impressive engineering feat, but who cares? At the end of the day u have less hp and much less torque. An LS1 is the same price as a rotary motor, it weighs 60 pounds more, 100+hp advantage, double the torque of a rotary, and STILL gets better gas mileage. You can win the hp/liter arguement and we (v8 owners) can win everything else.

  • @shoppy16 s2000 makes the most hp per liter in the world 2.0l@240hp.... still slow

  • @shoppy16 i have a 91 c1500 with a 383 stroker and a 240sx......and the 240 is funner =)

  • @shoppy16 I'm a Ford guy but I have to give it to you on a true statement. Plus lets not forget that american muscle (whether ford or GM/Dodge) you have much more reliable horsepower whereas many of these imports require much more maintinence as you start adding mod for mod.

  • @DJSlurp1200 Well it depend on how much horsepower you run depending on the maintinence part of things with any motor not just imports but your a ford guy so you have ohc to my sbc with solid lifters that have to be adjusted every two weeks

  • @shoppy16 Well said Sir

  • @turbofb24 Thats cool and all...still not as good as v8s. Still over a second and over 120mph slower in the qusrter lol

  • @RScar311 It's the the number one rated comment...meaning it's at the very top.

  • @RScar311 God damn it dude. Please read my original post after coming to your latest revelation.

  • @RScar311 And yet, for almost everyone, it means the box that the air filter is contained in.

  • @RScar311 No. I mean airbox. Look it up, enlighten yourself.

  • I would roast that stang with my rx7. What a bullshit race. Rx7 all day

  • imports : losing and lieing about mods since day 1.  =) Its cool though...cause ill bet he has about 100 extra HP in excuses for why he lost.

  • That Mach should have started in 2nd and would have left his ass farther back in the dust.

  • WORLD'S FASTEST ROTARY NEW GENERATION RX8 6:51@217mph

    look it up lol lmao

  • at all v8 n ls1, 2, ,3 ,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 n all hear.......lol when ya can do these #s wit the same displacement, then maybe yall can talk

    WORLD'S FASTEST ROTARY NEW GENERATION RX8 6:51@217mph

  • I'm sorry, but you don't mess with Mach 1s

  • Calling an Rx-7 is a ricer is blasphemy. In case most of you know, real racing is not going in a straight line for a 1/4 mile and waiting for a number to pop up on a screen, it's on a circuit. It is truly an embarrassment to be an American after reading most of these comments. The only decent American made V8 are the Ls1-Ls7 motors from Chevy.. Everything else is American made failure and I'm an American and I can admit that.

  • @iRx8 dont forget ls9, an LS motor is a very nice motor, i love mine

  • My uncle has a '37 Chevrolet with a 327 small-block V8 in it (not the stock motor, obviously). One time quite a while ago, he tied into it with an '80s RX-7 going westbound over Mt. Hood on Highway 26. The RX was revving its guts out and banging gears, but on every straight the '37 Chev would rocket by at something like 90-110, depending on how long the straight was. Obviously, the RX had superior cornering to the stock 1937 chassis and suspension, and would gain big in the bends. Fun story.

  • well in my book the rx7 still did a good job (the motor, not the driver) if it can keep up with a V8. which is still sad to see that "big boy toys" have a hard time beating a little 1.3L motor lol but for the muscle heads i hope you guys know that the rx7 is a track car, not a drag car.

  • wow the rx driver cant drive for sh!+ i had a 88 rx na n would stay rite next to them no problem so the 93 should be murdering the v8 piece of sh!t........ just saying

  • @turbofb24 i think you saying to much 93 rx7 tt os 225 ponies or somewhere around there 2003 mach is 305 and 320 tq qtr mile in 13.2 you rice import owners dont know shit about muscle cars , freaking ricecauteer

  • @SuperSnake330CID 255hp, but true, stock to stock, mach wins but who knows if these are stock, either way, i am sure it was fun

  • @rotaryturbo88 maybe thats the best model of the RX7 and if thats the deal why dont we bring out the best model of the mustang 03/04 cobra 390hp underrated and 390tq underrated 0-60 4.4 qtr mile in 12.6 good driver of course. and if your gonna say look at the years. ok the 1994 cobra is 240hp and 285tq underrated still gets to 0-60 in like 5.4 5.6 and qtr mile in 13.5 good drive that is , so now you know and if your gonna bring up a supra then ill take a 1969 shelby eleanor 0-60 4.8 qtrmile 13.4

  • @SuperSnake330CID why are you trying to argue, or even compare cars, i own an rx7 and i also own a trans am ws6 so i appreciate both and i am not trying to compare any cars here, i was simply saying that the rx7 came with 255 cause you said 225, and no thats not the best cause the best one came with 280 but not once did i try to say the rx7 was faster nor am i gonna bring up some other cars that have nothing to do with this video, like shelby or supra or cobra. grow up...

  • @rotaryturbo88 im not trying to argue , lol im just stating some ,facts but thats just it , for a secon there i thought you might be one of those hard headed prick rice owners , judging by your name that is and like i said i am grown up, so thats just it bRUH hehe, and yea i just searched google up for 93 rx7 and 225 is what i found also i own a 97 mustang gt so i know 225 is not that much atleast i got some tq , so that will do for now

  • @SuperSnake330CID yeah google is wrong, the FD in U.S. came with 255 and in Japan they had 280, but they are decently light so it moves ok. and doesnt a 97 mustang GT have 260? cause the old 5.0 had 225 and in 96 they increased power by 35hp and decreasing engine size down to the 4.6 at the same time.

    but anyways, nobody is arguing, stock to stock i think the mach 1 is faster but both are nice cars and who knows if these are even stock. at least they gave us a video to watch right?

  • @rotaryturbo88 yea i guess. btw the 97 gt has around 215-225 hp, depending on exhaust system and they increased the hp in 99 gt , but yea, it still pulls good , though , i mean up to 100mph its pretty fast after its like a horse , heavy and weak and ponies , whats all done to your TA?

  • @rotaryturbo88 yea Mach 1 is faster stock to stock i own an RX7 and my roommate owns a Mach 1 i beat him from the line but he catches up but then again my shit isnt turbo anylonger since i removed them cuz of the high gas prices

  • @kzoney you have an FD and "removed" the turbos cause of gas prices?

    who the F*%$ does that and how is it running without engine management, i dont know if that sounds legit to me

  • @rotaryturbo88 of course there was engine management I have 2 rotary engines 1 have my twin turbos the other is naturally aspirated hahaha I meant to say I replaced my entire engine I an friends with a rotary guru so shit like this is easy to him so I have 2 rotary engines that are rebuilt with racing beat parts next thing is the 20b

  • @turbofb24 you wish an 88 rx7 n/a would stay next to a Mach 1

  • Muscle was here first, Import toys have to get on steriods just to beat Muscle...All Natural

  • Comment removed

  • american muscle all the way. fuck imports!

  • @bountyhunter4691 Same to you ... ?

  • Man that RX-7 must be stock down to the airbox! Mach sounds damn nice.

  • @XR4turbo Aaaaaah.....American Muscle.

  • Stock the 7 runs what I mentioned above.

  • This rx-7 may have a low compression problem because both of these cars are supposed to have virtualy the same 1/4 mile time in factory stock specs. Either that or the Mustang has some minor mods like a cpu flash tune, intake, and maybe an exhaust. I had a driend with a Mach 1 and with just those mods he ran a 13.2, the 7 runs between 13.7-13.9 depending on the year.

  • @Chrisnuzzo76 13 for a bolt on mach? Needs a driver mod.

  • @A4Eaton What's wrong with a 13.2 on radials with only exhaust and a flash tune? The car is only rated at 13.8 at 102 in full stock form.

  • @A4Eaton <----- This guy. Dickbag... Bolt on could mean 1 or a couple or a bunch of bolt ons. He could also be racing at high altitude....

  • @DaBluedude100 So you automaticly assume that i'm a dick?

  • @A4Eaton all ive got is what you put on the internet. Was not a very charitable statement you made.

  • anyone can drive a faster car in a straight line, just because you have a mustang beating a 7 in a straight line doesnt make it a faster car, take that to something realistic, with say corners...some call it a racetrack, and youd see a full different story, see what cars "faster" and then when you really want to test your own as well as the cars capabilities, The best motorsport invented "Drifting" would be your next option...and again the 7 would undoubtedly conquer again

  • @TheJonSlesser Funny thing is racing in a straight line is more realistic then racing on corners... Im sorry but if your street race corners your a moron.... So maybe you should think about something like that next time More people street race straight lines then anything.

  • @TheJonSlesser Drifting isn't even determined by a marker.... are you freaking stupid? Do you know how to drift and what is entailed in drifting? Come back to reality and then learn how a race works

  • @TheJonSlesser I bet if the RX7 won the race you'd be gloating like there was no tomorrow. Get the fuck out of here with your ricer excuses.

  • @TheJonSlesser but yet you were watching this video? don't bring up track racing on a drag video go watch track racing if you're gonna talk about corners kid

  • @TheJonSlesser

    Stock Rx7s suck at drifting, if you really try to drift a rx7 around a track without setting up the suspension you're just going to spin out

    Alot

  • @TheJonSlesser straight line racing shows who is faster, drifting and track racing is driving skill so yea the mach 1 is faster than the "7"

  • @TheJonSlesser Ill put money i can run you down on a racetrack in my mach1 you sound like a forza video game bitch. The rx7 is not a very good drift car and nor is it a great track car stock. Sure you can do great things with them but a mazdaspeed mx5 is a better track car... You want to go drifting go ahead. Youl get 2 mins of spinning out and then your tires will be all gone... But thats OK! youl still have forza!

  • Run what you brung guys. The Mach1 is clearly the faster car in this race. Good kill.

    This is coming from an RX-7 owner btw.

  • The fd rx7 came twin turbo. You actually make more power with a big single. I'd bet the fagstang has some significant modifications. Considering my 7mgte supra can take a stang from a roll all day and the rx has more power and significantly less weight than my fat old supra it should take a standard v8 stang wouldn't ya say. Let's throw a t88, fuel system, standalone, and some bpu's on the rx and go again.

  • @1uzttsoarer well if you werent a fucking ricer and knew anything about real cars youd know the mach isnt your run of the mill mustang.

  • @svbummin I'm just going to toss this out there... so you can rip it apart if you want too

    Rx7 276hp on stock turbos at 2830pounds = 9.75hp per 100 pounds

    Mach1 305hp stock at 3380 pounds = 9.02hp per 100 pounds

    If both cars are stock the Rx7 should win assuming the driver knows how to shift/drive/stay in powerband...

    Just saying and before someone makes a zomgzorz v8 haz tourque yo

    Keep in mind F1 cars have less than 250ft-lbs of tourqe and have no problems going fast ;)

  • @Grappler130 that might be but stock mach1s spin 330hp. so thats around 9.76 - ford under-rated them after the recall on 01 cobras, and stopping production in 02. the 03 mach and terminator cobras were with a revised 32 valve--so to be safe they kept hp #s down, but they pull hard right past 6000rpm

    it always comes down to the driver

  • @Grappler130 the rx7 may have 276hp for the Japan spec model... but we got the p.o.s. twin turbo setup. 255 at the "crank" and about 215-225 to the wheels.

  • @Grappler130 They actually make a little more, but come on dude... F1 cars make RX7s look heavy.. Btw Just to turn that same thing against you..... Top fuel cars are the fastest in straight line speed... In any case, the mach 1 actually has 320hp so regardless the rx7 should eventually be passed in a close battle such as that.

  • i would be disappointed if i were the rx7 driving knowing that you slapped on tt and lost and machs have their speed from a dig too

  • @Soulscarz yo just to chime in late in the game soulscarz is retarded for saying the dude slapped on a twin turbo...thats stock on the almighty 3rd gen rx7! oh and thats 1.3 liters by the way...look up rx7s on wiki and read about them...alot of firsts and pretty rare on all accounts from engine and passive rear steering on fcs to front mid engine designe and convertible is first in the world to have a pre fab vert dropped into chassy..rx7s are the best and not a typical car you see unlike fords

  • @Soulscarz RX-7's come with twin turbos from the factory. They don't make that much power on the stock rotary. I would be dissapointed if I lost to the Mustang in the vid with a stock LS1 RX-7 though. 

  • man i love both cars

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more