Phillhellenes, another example of coward atheis, who can't handle truth!

[ilovladoo]

athirst kafirs

[Webbbear3]

@Probokator Yea that's cool.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 sorry for very late reply. my company block youtube and fb. I cannot use my company net to reply to youtubers anymore. And outside working time, I already promised it is for family. so if you like to have a discussion with me, please sent it to probokator AT yahoo DOT com. If not, that's okay, may peace be upon you.

[probokator]

@probokator now for m theory, wheter you means membrane theory or multi verse theory, it is a hypothesis based on mathematical model. it is not an established fact acknowledge in science community. Because it is not falsifiable, not observeable, and no experiment can prove it at the moment. It is supra natural because you point out something that work outside our natural world, our universe that bound by set of law. Not very different with say god did it.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 now for m theory, wheter you means membrane theory or multi verse theory, it is a hypothesis based on mathematical model. it is not an established fact acknowledge in science community. Because it is not falsifiable, not observeable, and no experiment can prove it at the moment. It is supra natural because you point out something that work outside our natural world, our universe that bound by set of law. Not very different with say god did it.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 also, what makes saying god did it became illogical? what it is illogical by saying some concious agent create this universe?

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 I really cannot reply you if you reply me in youtube. Please sent it to my yahoo mail, if it is not too bothersome.

[Webbbear3]

God is not even s hypothesis, for it is not testable. The multimeter theory is excepted because throughout it's life span, it has been tested with similar results from all scientists.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 oint, umm can I back to this next time? my little rascal bugging me and its kinda late in this time zone. I promise I would not run, I'll get back to you ASAP. 

[Webbbear3]

@ Probokator Singularity Are curves in our universe. Matter and antimatter collided, causing a reaction so heated, that the universe as we know it, was created. The universe may well have existed pre big bang, but not in the form that we know it. There is also the m theory. This theory I find extremely interesting. You should read about it. I know you grew up believing in god, but he just doesn't make any sense, break free of your illogicality.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 I will google about this m theory, thanks for the info. But I will critical in this way. Many theory incorporated that there are universe before big bang, some say multi verse, etc. none have proof. What it's different with saying god did it?

[Webbbear3]

Due to the components used to create our universe, I can tell you in theory as far as physics goes, that god does not have to exist for us to exist. I suggest you read The elegant Universe, it will explain everything about this, including dimensions, in a way that beginners can understand.:)

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 I believe that big bang is the official theory of the origin of universe. it said it all came from singularities. what does it means? singularities only means compacted matter in very high density. where does it came from?

[Webbbear3]

@Probokator because logically your god doesnt need to exist for our universe to exist

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 can you explain how universe came to exist that make you sure that it can be exist without God?

[Webbbear3]

What's the truth? For religious people like yourself are so hard headed in the sense that you refuse to realize that there is NO god.

[probokator]

@Webbbear3 how can you be sure that there is no God?

[jiggymonkey]

So... you never responded to my answer in our dialogue. It's been over a month. Did you forget to respond? Or did you decide to ignore my response?

It saddens me to see that you are guilty of generalizing. Not all atheists run away when they are proven wrong. I'll freely admit, up until now I always thought the black stone was inside the Ka'bah with just a viewing hole. But this is quite a trivial fact to be impugning someone's intellectual integrity over, wouldn't you say?

[probokator]

@jiggymonkey I do not say that atheist are fool only because they do not know such a detail on where is the black stone is. But this Phil say I'm wrong and pnewd when I said that he is wrong, the black stone is not inside the kabah. If he was truthful, he just need to say that he was wrong on that, but he rather delete my comment and block me. What kind of a attitude is that? Are we trying to look for the truth or just mocking each other. 

[probokator]

@jiggymonkey About your answer, I'm sorry. It need me to search every transitional fossils you mentioned, to see wheter they are showing gradual changes or leaping changes. At that time I was so busy with work. So I kinda, leave it for a while but then forgot, sorry. I do not think I can't answe you now too, because it is almost Ied holy days (Islam Holidays after fasting in ramadhan).