Added: 11 months ago
From: aodscarecrow
Views: 18,932
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We are many independent identities who depend on each other. The Earth is dying because its' cells are dying. "People" are the Earth's "cells".

    LIVE NOW! BECOME ALIVE NOW!

    THERE IS STILL TIME FOR EARTH'S PEOPLE TO TAKE BACK OUR PLANET!

    (DRIVE YOUR CARS ONLY WHEN NECESSARY, INSTEAD CHOOSE TO TAKE THE BUS, CAR POOL, RIDE A BIKE, WALK. IF WE DON'T FEED THE GAS MACHINE IT WILL DIE.)

    You can give it up now, or have it taken from you later.

    Yes, it is as easy as that.

  • @ERICWAGNERSLUCID That's why we should switch to nuclear power it is safe and efficient.

  • @re121089 there is nothing safe and nothing efficient about nuclear power ...at all... nothing, zero... refined uranium is in fact the most moronic invention ever created by mankind.

  • @aodscarecrow nuclear power is very cheap and outputs lots of power thus it is efficient, sure their are a few accidents in nuclear power plants but the number of people who die in these accidents are far less then the number of people that die of mining for coal or other forms of energy. the only even slightly valid argument against nuclear power plants is the environment. so don't say their is nothing god about nuclear energy.

  • @re121089 Dont kid yourself. There is absolutely nothing even remotely safe about nuclear energy as there is absolutely no way to deal with nuclear waste. The mere invention of refined uranium was the act of a deranged mind. The power plants are anything but efficient as they are merely old style steam turbines that create a huge amount of the most toxic substance on earth by default. As Einstein said "its a hell of a way to boil water" There are far, far better ways to produce energy.

  • @aodscarecrow the problem is you define efficient as environmental safety I don't. I define efficient as low cost high output of power and nuclear power is just that. if the yucca mountain project is undertaken we have a way to get rid of the waste.

  • @re121089 no, I define efficiency as that which is efficient. The fact that the nuclear industry produces such an incredible amount of the most toxic substance ever known by default renders it anything but efficient. If you want to see what an efficient energy system looks like go to my website and click the link entitled "The future of free energy and why carbon is a threat to the establishment" THAT is an efficient system, available right now and held back only by govt corruption.

  • @aodscarecrow no, I define efficiency as efficient, not including environmental cost. you are repeating your self I presented a way to get rid of the waste, and worst of all you did not give a link

  • @re121089 thecrowhouse(dot)com/freecarbo­nenergy(dot)html

  • @aodscarecrow I found a video completely destroying your shit free carbon energy is such bullshit and you are an idiot for believing it I will give you a link to a youtube video completely debunking free carbon

    /watch?v=RadnGqPjdBY

  • @re121089 I thank you for demonstrating your intellect...

  • @aodscarecrow your welome

  • Nuclear physicists are morons- Radioactive materials need to be separated, not lumped together.One day the State will pay famliles to bury small amounts of radioactive material on their property, its the only logical solution to undo the accrual of all this waste.

  • @cTcSpirit The best way to deal with nuclear waste is to bury it 100 miles below ground in the desert where its toxicity can't reach anything. Oil is very toxic but it is so deep under ground it harms no one. putting small amounts of radio active material in some ones back yard is the most retarded idea I have ever heard of do you know how toxic that material is? You would have to bury it very deep for it to be "safe".Not only is that plan not safe but expensive and impractical.

  • @re121089 Np, you lack the means to understand- Problem solved, PLUS the Government would have to pay a fee to everyone for "keeping" a small amount on their property. Small amounts of radiation, like your small amount of intelligence- is easily containable, and it doesn't have to be buried 100 miles deep. lol.

  • @cTcSpirit oops my bad I meant to say 200 ft the idea is still stupid though

  • @cTcSpirit I don't think a lot of people would volunteer to have nuclear waste buried in to their back yard look at all of the environmentalists on this page for example now I got one question for you how deep do you think you have to bury the waste before it is safe? oops I messed up again I meant 2000ft

  • @cTcSpirit When a Family is paid a yearly fee -for the safe containment of a small amount of radioactive waste- Don't worry, the sheep will bumrush to follow their neighbour once they know about it. 10 ft is sufficiently deep to contain a small amount. The key is SEPARATING it. EVerything contains a small amount of radiation, in small amounts, it's not deadly. As i said, Nuclear "experts" are clueless gimps.

  • I keep complaining to BBC about their lack of reporting and broadcasting the truth. BBC is paid for by the people of Britain yet they continue to act as a propaganda machine for the government of the day by only allowing interviews with so-called government spokespersons..

  • Hi Max, i'm a big fan! Have been researching meditation, law of attraction, spirituality, etc., for a while now. I find your work fascinating and full of truth. I was just curious what your thoughts were on Tsarion's reptilian beliefs? Do you have any interviews or videos where you discuss this subject? To be quite honest, I am also a fan of Tsarion, but I find this idea of reptilians to be very disturbing. Any thoughts or directions would be greatly appreciated! Thank you very much for all yo

  • @TheFlashlance I don't agree with you abour Chris being more informative.. I prefer Max anyday of the week ;)

  • @TheFlashlance I don't get involved in petty arguments.. it's a waste of energy.. I have better things to occupy my mind with :D

  • @TheFlashlance Who are they?.. no I don't know them..

  • Looking forward to 11 parts being on the tip of the Jet stream in Alberta . My heart goes out to Japan. I have been doing a little research on Thorium as well . Would love a little reactor on the acreage . Recall reading years ago $40,000 for 100 people. at todays inflation ?

    While im on my soap box

    Bring back Hemp ...Corn for gas in what is deemed a near food crisis? . Bayer's Pronto pesticide killing the Bees (read the leaked EPA Doc) Monsanto...Sad days people. Lets take it all back.

  • Koji Morimoto served as a chief assistant animator for Akira, but the guy does have a great resume under his belt for all the projects he's done. It's good to hear he's alright along with the fact Chris is friends with him.

  • Has anyone done any research on the Liquid Flouride-Thorium Reactor if so what are the pros and cons you know of , I have always been against nuclear energy even when it comes to thorium but the Liquid Flouride-Thorium Reactor seems on the surface immune to melt down and recycles its own waste . Just thought I would pick a few brains on there safety , any takers on the subject please?

  • @TheFlashlance  hahahahahahaha - you are absolutely right!

  • Could you create infinite energy using extremly powerfull magnets?.

  • @AwakenFromTheSlumber niklola tesla figured out a way to make infinite free energy for the whole world look him up if your intrested

  • @sk8pn read the work of walter russel or watch the videos on youtube

  • @twohseven ok

  • @sk8pn lots of people have found that out mate. Problem is that the people that own the power industry wont let it happen and even resort to buying patents to free energy technology and then destroying them. Oil companies do this also. (same people own both)

  • @sk8pn He signed over 51% of his inventions and patents to have his wireless machine financed.... now they are all locked up thanks to J.P. Morgan.

    Google 1974 Cancer Cure.

    Cannabis Cures Cancer. Truth. Investigate it for yourself.

  • Thanks Max.

  • I'm sorry, but one cannot take seriously somebody who displays his ignorance so openly (in this case, Chris confused talk about Japan's geography, and about the "blossoming of the population" in the last 20 years since his last visit:  Japan's population was 123 million in 1990. Today, it's 127 million - call that blossoming?) This character has no idea of what he is talking about.

  • I love Max a true face of humanity and what we can do... Thank you!

  • I prefer listening to you Max.. not too keen on Chris..

  • EMP weapon just shot out of Maine into Canada. Amazing catch by Dutchsince. This is a good catch, too. /watch?v=oGG6YZ1REVU

  • Thank you Max!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more