ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL LAWS CAN EXPLAIN how an airplane works or how a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. What about natural selection? Natural selection doesn't produce anything. It only "selects" from what is produced and it only operates once there is life, not before. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, then that species survives (is "selected"). That's all it is! Don't worship it!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
17th attempt, man you waste your entire life making these, and you will die one day and nothing will happen, get outta ur basement dude the world is a big place
@apericubes "An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates. What he is doing is precisely this; examining and rationalizing the world around him through critical thinking and logic. This is a fundamental part of the advancement of a society and one of the driving forces that brought us to where we are now.
Personally I have no problem with anyone being skeptical of anything.
But when it comes to creationists, it is exactly as you say, tooltime. Their arguments have been addressed untold times yet they refuse to find, and listen to, the answers, which is the opposite of a skeptic.
And then they refuse to hold their own beliefs under a microscope, again, the opposite of a skeptical approach.
Dude did you check you "A Biblical Model of Earth History"? what a fucking joke! "In conclusion to this section, the Bible gives a model of earth history that is testable. In our opinion, it fits the actual observations of science better than the evolution model."
why the fuck is everyone talking like there from the victorian age of europe "Ohh! even with rambling you sir make your point valid and clear!" I support grammar but thats alittle over the top, dont you think?
I have the same problem. It's hard to start a video and it's doubly hard to end a video. Unscripted and uncut is an art form that very few can master. I try to just jump in to the topic without any announcements, adendums, preambles, introductions, or set ups. Just start talking about the subject.
Thanks for making 17(+?) attempts at getting this video completed; the end-product was quite clear, and this was a very solid counterpoint to the pseudo-skeptical (and downright irritatingly condescending!) approach that creationists seem to be taking more often these days. The point about the legal system was perfect too (i.e. the notion of "precedent", being foundational in law) - I hadn't considered that before, but it's a very tangible refutation to that "historical science" bullshit.
Serious, I would eliminate laws that would, how shall I put this, impede evolutionary progress. Helmet/seat belt laws for example. I toyed with testing people before allowing them to breed, but that runs into all kinds of problems.
I'm aware that my ideas are impractical. Maybe we should put all "stupid" people in a room with just one, unlocked, door. Those that get out are fine and those who can't even find to one door can't get out anyway.lol
I simply said that crooks around here are stupid, all the crimes I related are allegedly true, I heard two from a retired cop who investigated them and one from a convience store clerk. Depends, I think all stupid people should be locked up regardless if they have committed a crime!
Crooks around here are stupid anyway. One left his ball cap at the scene where he murdered a guy. Another tried to rob a store with a shotgun, got impatient, put the gun on the counter and started putting money in the bag himself. The clerk took his gun. A young thief tried to steal beer, the clerk told him he was too young, so the thief showed him his ID! Cops were waiting for him when he got home!
christiods have a biiig biig problem with their arguments and bigotrys, they ALL cut both ways, ALWAYS, wich is hilarious.
prayer in school? bibles in school? yep, but as soon as you point out that this means QURAN and Muslimic prayer in school, it suddenly goes* * Oh NO, nonono, noo ,no ,noo , because..well noo*
When you tell someone who genuinely sucks that they suck, it is no surprise when reply, "No, YOU suck". It's a sucky response.
Creationists know instinctively our arguments kill theirs to death (and beyond), so they copy our arguments at the "No, you suck" level, without realising that simply opens a lower level of suckage into which they have just descended.
nice good job actually going to one of these things and talking to these people. I doubt I could sit through one of those lectures and I probably wouldn't want to ask the tough questions either.
yea. i've always wanted Tf00t to do a debunk of that "six proofs of God's existence" ad since i like his style best... but any of the big names of youtube could do it and i'd be happy.
not because i can't answer (debunk) the 6 proofs myself... i just can't do it with such elegance as these guys can.
yeah same here. I could but as the usual creationist argument goes, I dont have the knowledge to do so. I'm too lazy to do any semblance of research other than what one creationist challenged me to. I answered that challenge but he has not answered me.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
So would you be completely opposed to allowing schools to teach the possibility for God? I mean, If evolution is as true as you say it is, shouldn't have any problem holding up against creationism.
There's just one problem with your theory here. Evolution may well stand up against creationism when evaluated by adults and experts (i.e. those with the tools to think logically), but presenting it to children and young kids and expecting them to see it with the same level of reasoning is, frankly, absurd.
Biblical Creationism isn't science, it's mythology, so if you're going to teach it, teach it in its proper subject. We don't give any other form of creationism attention, so why focus so much on one story that's complete rubbish? When you think about it, evolution and creationism deal with two different things. Evolution is how life evolved on earth and why it is the way it is today. Creationism is the belief that a deity created everything, not just life on earth.
It doesn't. Any contention is dreamed up by theists. May I ask; which god should be taught? I already mentioned the Norse creation story, are we gonna give ALL faiths equal time? The kids'll love that, theyll be in school until they're 40!
How do you figure? Other gods didn't create those things in the various creation stories? Where do you get the idea that Yahweh created time, matter and space?
I love how the ID debate, by its very nature, sends many of its proponents running into the arms of post modernism. Bankruptcy for bankruptcy, anyone?
I've met these sort of creationists before... it's kinda pointless to even try to reason with them. Some people just seem to have some kind of genetic aversion to logic and facts and all that cool stuff.
Theists do not want their children exposed to the contradictory evidence in case it starts them thinking that faith in sky daddy and their holy book of fairytales could be a crock. They are seriously worried about their youth 'thinking' and being damned for it. Sad shit for sure. As a bio teacher, I am confonted on a daily basis by indoctrinated Baptist youth who cannot keep their little biblical mouths from outbursts about their fairy god being responsible for their existence. Child abuse.
Every time I have one of these discussions, the notion that all interpretations are equal comes up. Simply put, it is bullshit. Imagine your car is stolen, and you have video tape footage of the man who stole it driving away. You recover your car and the police prosecute the man. At the trial, the man argues against their interpretation, and then offers that the person seen on the video was a doppelganger. Would anyone think that as valid as the prosecution's case?
exatly!, without mention that if every intrepretation is equal then he could say that he didmt stole a car, that according to his point of view that things is a candy and you cant put a man in jail for take away your candy...in fact he could go even further and say that from his point of view that car is his so he didnt commit any crime at all... reality is not a democracy things are real or not, something happened or didnt happen.
I've seen this a lot. Every time an antireligious argument or term pops up that works well, the religious steal it, twist it, and try to use it against the antireligious. Never seems to work quite as well for the religious, though.
One of the more blatant examples is when the religious started claiming atheists were all indoctrinated.
I couldn't agree more about the smug smarminess of Kent Hovind. He always comes across as such a prick. I guess it's what happens when you're openly an idiot and arrogant about it too.
A lecture on the evidence for intelligent design and creationism should consist of, a person walking up to the podium, perhaps clearing their throat, and saying "Welcome to are presentation on the evidence for intelligent design and creationism. There is none. Thank you ladies and gentlemen for your time this evening, and drive safe on your trip home."
Even better: set up an 'Intelligent Design' lecture, and when the religious crowd is ready for a Hovind-like spiel, shout "God did it, evolution's a lie, evolutionists are going to hell!", and watch the hilarity ensue. :D
Yes. Charles Darwin did. Gregor Mendel added to it. Plenty of YouTubers have taken up the job and posted detailed explanations of evolution, among them such YouTubers as AronRa, Thunderf00t, and DonExodus2. Explanations are offered CONSTANTLY. Nobody is trying to keep evolution a secret from anyone. The problem is that nobody seems to be LISTENING, and when we redirect people to proper explanations, they don't seem to actually GO THERE.
Some people STILL don't understand it despite that. Just look at what this dumbass user said
TheMorbidAtheist:
"we arent part of evolution anymore, we invented condoms...for the last time, condoms eliminated the survival of the fittest game you dumbfuck. the game is different now, we dont live in nature where we have to compete with other animals for food and we can actually CONTROL our reproduction now"
Natural selection essentially boils down to "What makes me a good Demoman? If I were a BAD Demoman, I wouldn't be sittin' here discussin' it with ya, now would I?!" Condoms didn't eliminate natural selection by any means; they just added a few new rules.
I didn't remember him mentioning Hannity but I'm tired and the topic was creationism, intelligent design, religion, skepticism, semantic arguments about skepticism, being disingenuous and a shit website. You were already certain about your position.
very well put 5 stars. your are very smart. And no worries I do at least 5 takes of all my videos every time.. and they still dont come out how I want.
I think this goes to show how hard it is to view ourselves as irrational. I don't think anyone would reject the title of "skeptic" or "critical thinker". That's a problem with skeptical world view, everyone thinks they have it.
Holy shit! I just saw the Nuttings a week or two ago give a lecture on dinosaurs. Fucking crazy assholes. I asked if the guy believed in the Loch Ness Monster and he was going on and on about it.
yes, it does. A "joke" is meant to be funny, whether that be to me or you. Honestly, do you have a sense of humour?
Type O Negative have a song which says: "for the crime of burning me, I give to thee jackhammerape". It's a joke. Jokes don't always have to have an immediate reaction. Jokes are just fun.
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 months ago
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LAWS CAN EXPLAIN how an airplane works or how a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. What about natural selection? Natural selection doesn't produce anything. It only "selects" from what is produced and it only operates once there is life, not before. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, then that species survives (is "selected"). That's all it is! Don't worship it!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of both transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
Wow you tube is so easy a caveman can do it!!!
Go back to your job at Gieco!!
MyFishyWishy 1 year ago
gotta give it to the guy 17th attempt, poor dude lmao :P
Bulby93 2 years ago
Evilution
borrofburi 2 years ago
Evilution is just a theory HURR DURR!
borrofburi 2 years ago
Was testing something...
borrofburi 2 years ago
i think you are jesus and you are testing our faith
FluffyFeralMarmot 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
17th attempt, man you waste your entire life making these, and you will die one day and nothing will happen, get outta ur basement dude the world is a big place
apericubes 2 years ago
I suppose when you die people around the world are going to riot?
SolidSnakeRules 2 years ago
@apericubes yea... and you should get off your computer and start living your own advice :-)
I enjoy these vids and so do many others
deanjdk 2 years ago
@apericubes "An unexamined life is not worth living." - Socrates. What he is doing is precisely this; examining and rationalizing the world around him through critical thinking and logic. This is a fundamental part of the advancement of a society and one of the driving forces that brought us to where we are now.
LilDrummerBoy74 6 months ago
Tooltime, can I ask you a question? Did you really expect anything else from creationists?
Mequellios 2 years ago
Personally I have no problem with anyone being skeptical of anything.
But when it comes to creationists, it is exactly as you say, tooltime. Their arguments have been addressed untold times yet they refuse to find, and listen to, the answers, which is the opposite of a skeptic.
And then they refuse to hold their own beliefs under a microscope, again, the opposite of a skeptical approach.
threewiseman1 2 years ago
is it just me... or do all atheists have long hair? :P
thunderf00t, tooltime9901, amazing atheist and offcourse me :P
it must be the noodly appentage of the flying spaghetti monster, that gives atheists the will to grow long hair :P
jk :P
HemsefromdesreveR 2 years ago 4
My hair is just above shoulder-length
odenskrigare 2 years ago
Not me, but maybe I'm different because I'm a conspiracy theorist... who knows?
saruan 2 years ago
Break it up in soundbites. Then people might actually start to listen...
ProjectEnquirer 2 years ago
Perhaps, people could make a 'SIMPLE' video, demonstrating evolution and the evidence.
ProjectEnquirer 2 years ago
a tip for an easy life? embrace the editing software
technosnob303 2 years ago
wow man get some ritilan, something....
320iguy 2 years ago
Alpha Omega ministries? Sounds like the same place that DrOakley1689 fellow on here is from. He talks a load of cod shit too. :-)
taids 2 years ago
BestofScience aired a video that proves evolution! Primates, including humans, cannot make their own Vitamin C.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
This is from their website regarding evolution.
"Though often called a theory, in reality, evolution is usually presented as fact"
They've had over a century to learn and understand the definition of a scientific theory however they're STILL completely clueless.
Yet these people want to be taken seriously? We'll take them seriously when they actually learn about science instead of spouting stupidity.
themanwhoknew 2 years ago 4
Dude did you check you "A Biblical Model of Earth History"? what a fucking joke! "In conclusion to this section, the Bible gives a model of earth history that is testable. In our opinion, it fits the actual observations of science better than the evolution model."
Watch out evolution!
BlueNote4003 2 years ago
the dude's name is Nutting?
blasphemite 2 years ago 3
Nice work. Any chance that you could take a video camera along when you confront these guys? It would be great to see.
Cheers
NonStampCollector 2 years ago
Consistency is not a hobgoblin of fundamentalist minds. And remember floody fingerprints are a fliohazard, so be careful around them.
kevinanity 2 years ago
why the fuck is everyone talking like there from the victorian age of europe "Ohh! even with rambling you sir make your point valid and clear!" I support grammar but thats alittle over the top, dont you think?
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Indubitably!.... D'oh
underpantssquirrel 2 years ago
ha XD
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
What's wrong with his brain! Ha And what is behind that tarp!
Paulwhoisvegan 2 years ago
What the fuck are you talking about?!
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
good points, tooltime
zebruh 2 years ago
Mhmm I enjoy the rambling too.
Pink7777Returns 2 years ago 2
even when rambling sir, your points are noted, and valid.
TAXEXEMPTION 2 years ago
I have the same problem. It's hard to start a video and it's doubly hard to end a video. Unscripted and uncut is an art form that very few can master. I try to just jump in to the topic without any announcements, adendums, preambles, introductions, or set ups. Just start talking about the subject.
DeimosSaturn 2 years ago
Sokay.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
rambling shmambling- you rock either way!
EvilFluff85 2 years ago
Okay, you have taken a joke I made waaay too serious.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
That would infer that it is intelligent or the result of an intelligent agency. Hmm?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
TJ made a recent video in which he encountered an idiot. Speaks for itself.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Thanks for making 17(+?) attempts at getting this video completed; the end-product was quite clear, and this was a very solid counterpoint to the pseudo-skeptical (and downright irritatingly condescending!) approach that creationists seem to be taking more often these days. The point about the legal system was perfect too (i.e. the notion of "precedent", being foundational in law) - I hadn't considered that before, but it's a very tangible refutation to that "historical science" bullshit.
TheBlackwaterDemon 2 years ago
What I find funny is how anyone who believes in a thousands-year-old deity can call himself a "skeptic."
TheInsaneBastard 2 years ago
True, the "creationist skeptic" is definitely a walking contradiction, haha.
TheBlackwaterDemon 2 years ago 7
I think what you consider "rambling" is what most people consider "cohesive speech". You're too hard on yourself man.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
Serious, I would eliminate laws that would, how shall I put this, impede evolutionary progress. Helmet/seat belt laws for example. I toyed with testing people before allowing them to breed, but that runs into all kinds of problems.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Interesting idea. I have worked hard to purge myself of prejudice, but I can't seem to stop myself from being frustrated by imbeciles.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
I'm aware that my ideas are impractical. Maybe we should put all "stupid" people in a room with just one, unlocked, door. Those that get out are fine and those who can't even find to one door can't get out anyway.lol
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
I want to punch you in the face for Jesus!
notbill9465 2 years ago
I simply said that crooks around here are stupid, all the crimes I related are allegedly true, I heard two from a retired cop who investigated them and one from a convience store clerk. Depends, I think all stupid people should be locked up regardless if they have committed a crime!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Crooks around here are stupid anyway. One left his ball cap at the scene where he murdered a guy. Another tried to rob a store with a shotgun, got impatient, put the gun on the counter and started putting money in the bag himself. The clerk took his gun. A young thief tried to steal beer, the clerk told him he was too young, so the thief showed him his ID! Cops were waiting for him when he got home!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Let the thief get blown up! Why yes, mine is an American car, why do you ask?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Outstanding work ToolTime. I would have loved to see some video documentation.
Sometimes I wish you could lend your diciplined approach to others - ie. InMendam/DoNotGod. I appreciate your efforts.
UnhappyTestTubeBaby 2 years ago
I don't know. If someone stole, they'd be doing me a favor!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
you pronounced aronra wrong.
farmingisforme 2 years ago
How DARE YOU forget my name!?
SAY MY NAME, BITCH! SAY IT!
; )
KingHeathen 2 years ago 13
lol
Timmay123456789 2 years ago
christiods have a biiig biig problem with their arguments and bigotrys, they ALL cut both ways, ALWAYS, wich is hilarious.
prayer in school? bibles in school? yep, but as soon as you point out that this means QURAN and Muslimic prayer in school, it suddenly goes* * Oh NO, nonono, noo ,no ,noo , because..well noo*
nekftw 2 years ago
When you tell someone who genuinely sucks that they suck, it is no surprise when reply, "No, YOU suck". It's a sucky response.
Creationists know instinctively our arguments kill theirs to death (and beyond), so they copy our arguments at the "No, you suck" level, without realising that simply opens a lower level of suckage into which they have just descended.
philhellenes 2 years ago
In my bouts with creationists I always show them that they go against nearly every from of science, and not just evolutionary biology.
crazycrazycaleb 2 years ago
funny how the process used for criminal justice they agree with...
then they disagree with that SAME process when applied to science.
kukulza 2 years ago
you're rambling is like TJ's but less entertaining
WKaliberr 2 years ago
nice good job actually going to one of these things and talking to these people. I doubt I could sit through one of those lectures and I probably wouldn't want to ask the tough questions either.
ubergossen 2 years ago
Most people make me feel like purchasing a deluxe face-rearranging baseball bat.
ghostofdayinperson 2 years ago
Y'know, it sucks they don't make wooden baseball bats anymore. A skull crack just doesn't sound the same on aluminum!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
". . .it sucks they don't make wooden baseball bats anymore."
Protip: Axe handles.
IsaacBickerstaffEsq 2 years ago
You ever play stick ball my son? Not the same.lol
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Yes my child, I have played stick ball, but not with an axe handle. Those were reserved for Sharks.
IsaacBickerstaffEsq 2 years ago
Ramble on! Its interesting.
THEoldy 2 years ago
I notice the ads on your vid. lol you should look at them dude, and debunk them.
SCRulerShinoda 2 years ago
yea. i've always wanted Tf00t to do a debunk of that "six proofs of God's existence" ad since i like his style best... but any of the big names of youtube could do it and i'd be happy.
not because i can't answer (debunk) the 6 proofs myself... i just can't do it with such elegance as these guys can.
kukulza 2 years ago
yeah same here. I could but as the usual creationist argument goes, I dont have the knowledge to do so. I'm too lazy to do any semblance of research other than what one creationist challenged me to. I answered that challenge but he has not answered me.
SCRulerShinoda 2 years ago
Floody Bingerprints are NOT admissible in a court of law as evidence!!
Take for instance Wagner VS The State of Main 2002: It was WELL established!!
No more Floody Bingerprints, Mister Man!!!
raistlin072 2 years ago
lol
Evulmeh 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So would you be completely opposed to allowing schools to teach the possibility for God? I mean, If evolution is as true as you say it is, shouldn't have any problem holding up against creationism.
siekertr21 2 years ago
There's just one problem with your theory here. Evolution may well stand up against creationism when evaluated by adults and experts (i.e. those with the tools to think logically), but presenting it to children and young kids and expecting them to see it with the same level of reasoning is, frankly, absurd.
samOFblorx 2 years ago 6
Biblical Creationism isn't science, it's mythology, so if you're going to teach it, teach it in its proper subject. We don't give any other form of creationism attention, so why focus so much on one story that's complete rubbish? When you think about it, evolution and creationism deal with two different things. Evolution is how life evolved on earth and why it is the way it is today. Creationism is the belief that a deity created everything, not just life on earth.
texaschiick09 2 years ago
It doesn't. Any contention is dreamed up by theists. May I ask; which god should be taught? I already mentioned the Norse creation story, are we gonna give ALL faiths equal time? The kids'll love that, theyll be in school until they're 40!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
The Hebrew God is the only God that takes into account the creation of time, matter and space.
siekertr21 2 years ago
How do you figure? Other gods didn't create those things in the various creation stories? Where do you get the idea that Yahweh created time, matter and space?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Thats considerate of her.
Fangtorn 2 years ago
oh my godless!
every creation story deals with a deity creating the universe. the hebrew god isn't special. they are CREATION stories, siekertr21
So like RadarKat73080 said. Do we give every creation story equal time?
DudeSpectre 2 years ago
What is behind that Tarp! What?
Paulwhoisvegan 2 years ago
ok lets go ahead and throw in astrology with astronomy.
TheBlackSheep2134 2 years ago
Intelligent falling, the stork theory.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Comment removed
happyjesus123 2 years ago
Comment removed
happyjesus123 2 years ago
sounds like a fun lecture series.
truevoiceofsanity 2 years ago
I love how the ID debate, by its very nature, sends many of its proponents running into the arms of post modernism. Bankruptcy for bankruptcy, anyone?
-"Mo"
TheAwedCouple 2 years ago
retrojection? retrospect?
benjippoi 2 years ago
I've met these sort of creationists before... it's kinda pointless to even try to reason with them. Some people just seem to have some kind of genetic aversion to logic and facts and all that cool stuff.
ChaosIncarnate7 2 years ago 2
nonfail. :-)
ReverendAtomSmasher 2 years ago
I always wanted to ask if IDs taught aliens or the Norse Odin creationism?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
I'd support alien creationism, but Norse creationism? Hell, I got nothing against Odin and Freyr etc but you still gotta draw the line somewhere
SCRulerShinoda 2 years ago
Who created the aliens? Super aliens? What? You don't wanna drink the blood of your enemy outta his own skull in Valhalla?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
lol now now Radar
and I do, I just dont like Yggdrasil very much
SCRulerShinoda 2 years ago
Bah! By Ymir's frosty beard!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
Theists do not want their children exposed to the contradictory evidence in case it starts them thinking that faith in sky daddy and their holy book of fairytales could be a crock. They are seriously worried about their youth 'thinking' and being damned for it. Sad shit for sure. As a bio teacher, I am confonted on a daily basis by indoctrinated Baptist youth who cannot keep their little biblical mouths from outbursts about their fairy god being responsible for their existence. Child abuse.
saxmanchiro 2 years ago 6
You have my respect for possessing both the patience and attention span necessary to sit through those farces. Well done that man!
QuadError 2 years ago
I like your style... keep up the good work :P
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago
you've actually gone to these lectures?
NegativeNick 2 years ago
After I watch tooltime videos; I like to strip down naked, crack open a beer, and watch weekend at bernies on fast forward
MoreSciFiThanScience 2 years ago 5
I base my next kill upon the release of tooltimes videos. We all have our rituals
fatkat444 2 years ago 4
win
fffjjjnnn 2 years ago
Every time I have one of these discussions, the notion that all interpretations are equal comes up. Simply put, it is bullshit. Imagine your car is stolen, and you have video tape footage of the man who stole it driving away. You recover your car and the police prosecute the man. At the trial, the man argues against their interpretation, and then offers that the person seen on the video was a doppelganger. Would anyone think that as valid as the prosecution's case?
ThePunkReturns 2 years ago 2
maybe in a Texas court
Sav3TheWorld 2 years ago
exatly!, without mention that if every intrepretation is equal then he could say that he didmt stole a car, that according to his point of view that things is a candy and you cant put a man in jail for take away your candy...in fact he could go even further and say that from his point of view that car is his so he didnt commit any crime at all... reality is not a democracy things are real or not, something happened or didnt happen.
Kortosis 2 years ago
But shouldn't both be looked at and given equal scrutiny?
siekertr21 2 years ago
Not if one is full of shit!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
17? HAHAHAH, fagget! jk
NegativeNick 2 years ago
Excellent. Use atheistic mainstream terms to get their foot in the door, in a cool way... Great points.
ReligionThink 2 years ago
I've seen this a lot. Every time an antireligious argument or term pops up that works well, the religious steal it, twist it, and try to use it against the antireligious. Never seems to work quite as well for the religious, though.
One of the more blatant examples is when the religious started claiming atheists were all indoctrinated.
Anon11674 2 years ago
Great video.
I couldn't agree more about the smug smarminess of Kent Hovind. He always comes across as such a prick. I guess it's what happens when you're openly an idiot and arrogant about it too.
Deathinmusic 2 years ago
Good video man, but watch out for those floody pinger pants :D
chessdawgz 2 years ago
A lecture on the evidence for intelligent design and creationism should consist of, a person walking up to the podium, perhaps clearing their throat, and saying "Welcome to are presentation on the evidence for intelligent design and creationism. There is none. Thank you ladies and gentlemen for your time this evening, and drive safe on your trip home."
MyPisceanNature 2 years ago 3
Hey, some Poes should do that.
Even better: set up an 'Intelligent Design' lecture, and when the religious crowd is ready for a Hovind-like spiel, shout "God did it, evolution's a lie, evolutionists are going to hell!", and watch the hilarity ensue. :D
Anon11674 2 years ago 2
It's perfectly fine; I find your ramblings quite interesting, actually.
KriimIanga 2 years ago 2
"Finger Plints" :P
svaught32 2 years ago
Creationism stems from ignorance. Instead of ridiculing creationists, does anyone even bother to explain Evolution?
ProjectEnquirer 2 years ago
Yes. Charles Darwin did. Gregor Mendel added to it. Plenty of YouTubers have taken up the job and posted detailed explanations of evolution, among them such YouTubers as AronRa, Thunderf00t, and DonExodus2. Explanations are offered CONSTANTLY. Nobody is trying to keep evolution a secret from anyone. The problem is that nobody seems to be LISTENING, and when we redirect people to proper explanations, they don't seem to actually GO THERE.
KriimIanga 2 years ago 10
Some people STILL don't understand it despite that. Just look at what this dumbass user said
TheMorbidAtheist:
"we arent part of evolution anymore, we invented condoms...for the last time, condoms eliminated the survival of the fittest game you dumbfuck. the game is different now, we dont live in nature where we have to compete with other animals for food and we can actually CONTROL our reproduction now"
Fuck sakes who taught this guy evolution?
Bigbossjin 2 years ago 4
Someone obviously didn't teach him very well.
Natural selection essentially boils down to "What makes me a good Demoman? If I were a BAD Demoman, I wouldn't be sittin' here discussin' it with ya, now would I?!" Condoms didn't eliminate natural selection by any means; they just added a few new rules.
KriimIanga 2 years ago
great analogy - really made me laugh :D
symelian 2 years ago
Nutting? Really ... that's their name? LOL!
ProfMTH 2 years ago
I didn't remember him mentioning Hannity but I'm tired and the topic was creationism, intelligent design, religion, skepticism, semantic arguments about skepticism, being disingenuous and a shit website. You were already certain about your position.
Mephistophilus 2 years ago
Why would you do that or even want to be that and when did he say anything about Hannity?
Mephistophilus 2 years ago
Interesting.
Chuloloc 2 years ago
very well put 5 stars. your are very smart. And no worries I do at least 5 takes of all my videos every time.. and they still dont come out how I want.
katiefershadybaby 2 years ago
Web site.Fail. Flash from 19996. Fail. Music. Fail. Click > creation vacation.
Genisis....Best spelling fail ever.
"Finally! A program I can understand that teaches kids about creation and the problems with evolution!"
How to fail for only $125.
Mephistophilus 2 years ago
I watched the video you were talking about before I watched this one, I was kinda thinking the same thing...
Daclunator 2 years ago
I think this goes to show how hard it is to view ourselves as irrational. I don't think anyone would reject the title of "skeptic" or "critical thinker". That's a problem with skeptical world view, everyone thinks they have it.
TheScrewOnHead 2 years ago 3
dude make it whilst eating peanut butter
jaxlpose 2 years ago
"half-measured"
Generous of you.
BornInAsphodelMeadow 2 years ago
Holy shit! I just saw the Nuttings a week or two ago give a lecture on dinosaurs. Fucking crazy assholes. I asked if the guy believed in the Loch Ness Monster and he was going on and on about it.
antybu86 2 years ago 3
note to anyone who clicks on the link in the sidebar- I hope you like super annoying music
superextremelaser 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
third!
abaddon5 2 years ago
Why do people hate on the ones who say "First!", or "Second!" etc. IT'S A JOKE! A lame one, yes, but a JOKE!
abaddon5 2 years ago
uhh
a joke means that they dont mean it...
when they say that.. they mean it ...
it's not about the joke
it's about wasting space
Gooshnads 2 years ago
Oh, come on! Wasting space?! It's just a lame old joke! Are you really concerned with how much space a comment has on a youtube video?
abaddon5 2 years ago
the word "joke" obviously has a very loose meaning to you doesn't it?
Gooshnads 2 years ago
yes, it does. A "joke" is meant to be funny, whether that be to me or you. Honestly, do you have a sense of humour?
Type O Negative have a song which says: "for the crime of burning me, I give to thee jackhammerape". It's a joke. Jokes don't always have to have an immediate reaction. Jokes are just fun.
abaddon5 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3rd, FUCK U CAVEMAN
zgbrotherhood 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
second
blahben342 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
First!
japanezeboi 2 years ago
lol get down voted for being first.
zgbrotherhood 2 years ago 8