it's a dozer blade for digging positions. and it can pwn an abrams. it can fire a laser-guided krasnopol shell. but it has a hull of a T-80, so armour ise is good but close combat, an abrams can pwn it.
well... concidering that the MSTA-S isnt a tank, and is not designed to fight against enemy army as it is indeed an artillery system... i wouldnt expect it to be able to take on an Abrams or ANY tank for that matter... but a T-80U and T-90 can whip and Abrams ass easy
that's US english. i speak UK english. Well, any conventional artillery weapon should be capable of defeating enemy tanks from afar, for their shells come from above, meaning they're capable of engaging tanks at where they're weakest, top armour. however, if an abrams does manage to get in range of the MSTA, the MSTA will either lose, or if the MSTA fires directly at it, it'll emerge victorious
I was wrong, not the UAE, Kuwait. In the 1997 international competition to provide Kuwaiti Army with a battalion of self-propelled artillery systems, the PLZ-45 surprisingly beat the US and European competitors to win the contract.
The Chinese GHN45 has comparable range, and it's only 45 calibers. 39 kilometers with ERFB-HB-BB. GHN45 is Austrian in design. Chinese designation of the canon is PLL01 (W88/89) gun-howitzer, and they have a SP version of the canon called PLZ45 155mm SP GH. It's a lighter canon, and has comparable range to the much larger 52 caliber this Russian system has. UAE became a customer of the Chinese canon artillery as they liked the overall performance and properties of the howitzerm
umm... do you really think the Abrams would get within fireing range of this beast with out getting hammered by an A2G missile or tank? HAHA anyway the MSTA-S can fire a laser guided NLOS round and kill and Abrams from over 35mi. away XD moron
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Lol, your dumb as hell. Its an artillery piece, the Abrams is a tank. It can out run, and out maneuver that piece of crap without even breaking a sweat. That has to stay in one place to LOB its round, the Abrams can move as 40MPH and still fire its 120MM cannon without missing. IT would be a simple win for the Abrams.
you fucking retard, your arguing over an Abrams vs. an Artillery piece... WTF is your malfunction? LOL anyway... in its defence the MSTA-S can fire a laser guided NLOS round and kill an Abrams from over 30mi. away dumbass XD you dont really think the Abrams would get within fireing range of this beast anyway before it gets taken out by an A2G missile or tank do you? HAHA if so your sadly mistaken
"WTF LOL" fucking nerd -.- and you stupid fuck think that other countrys doesnt have SPA systems? and remember that russian technology sucks when compared to countrys like usa, japan, german and so on
But more importantly. You assume the US would blindly send tanks into an area with gunships, or even planes. You can't send in tanks by themselves. It is something that requires a co-op effort. I don't even really know what this argument is about. But I appreciate how you came at me like your the all knowing genius, along with that insulting me for no apparent reason. But if the whole discussion is one artillery piece, vs ANY tank. The tank would win every single time. Artillery fires INDIRECT
...rounds. While a tank moving a fuck ton faster, with a lot more agility than a falling piece of metal, could easily take out a stationary artillery unit. But of course this situation would never happen. So, since they wont. Bo point in stressing any further discussion. So drop it. Its YouTube Comments. Not Mcblind fuck be stupid happy go go time.
creepy shot of it rising out of the water
dingfriesaredone666 3 years ago
it's a dozer blade for digging positions. and it can pwn an abrams. it can fire a laser-guided krasnopol shell. but it has a hull of a T-80, so armour ise is good but close combat, an abrams can pwn it.
russiantanksrule 3 years ago
well... concidering that the MSTA-S isnt a tank, and is not designed to fight against enemy army as it is indeed an artillery system... i wouldnt expect it to be able to take on an Abrams or ANY tank for that matter... but a T-80U and T-90 can whip and Abrams ass easy
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
enemy armor**
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
that's US english. i speak UK english. Well, any conventional artillery weapon should be capable of defeating enemy tanks from afar, for their shells come from above, meaning they're capable of engaging tanks at where they're weakest, top armour. however, if an abrams does manage to get in range of the MSTA, the MSTA will either lose, or if the MSTA fires directly at it, it'll emerge victorious
russiantanksrule 2 years ago
Only thing I don"t like is the gunner's moustache !
pipotherium 4 years ago 3
LOL
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
I was wrong, not the UAE, Kuwait. In the 1997 international competition to provide Kuwaiti Army with a battalion of self-propelled artillery systems, the PLZ-45 surprisingly beat the US and European competitors to win the contract.
nutcas 4 years ago
The Chinese GHN45 has comparable range, and it's only 45 calibers. 39 kilometers with ERFB-HB-BB. GHN45 is Austrian in design. Chinese designation of the canon is PLL01 (W88/89) gun-howitzer, and they have a SP version of the canon called PLZ45 155mm SP GH. It's a lighter canon, and has comparable range to the much larger 52 caliber this Russian system has. UAE became a customer of the Chinese canon artillery as they liked the overall performance and properties of the howitzerm
nutcas 4 years ago
no it wouldent this spg can hit or dissable the abrams from 8000 meters
Longliveputin122 4 years ago 3
yeas and abrams can put this shit down if it hits
asease1234 3 years ago
umm... do you really think the Abrams would get within fireing range of this beast with out getting hammered by an A2G missile or tank? HAHA anyway the MSTA-S can fire a laser guided NLOS round and kill and Abrams from over 35mi. away XD moron
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
ummm youre stupid... looks like you dont know about warfare, and you didnt even understand what i mean haha, typical russian...
asease1234 2 years ago
this thing can pwn a abrams
Longliveputin122 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lol, your dumb as hell. Its an artillery piece, the Abrams is a tank. It can out run, and out maneuver that piece of crap without even breaking a sweat. That has to stay in one place to LOB its round, the Abrams can move as 40MPH and still fire its 120MM cannon without missing. IT would be a simple win for the Abrams.
SpaceAgeDiaper 4 years ago
you fucking retard, your arguing over an Abrams vs. an Artillery piece... WTF is your malfunction? LOL anyway... in its defence the MSTA-S can fire a laser guided NLOS round and kill an Abrams from over 30mi. away dumbass XD you dont really think the Abrams would get within fireing range of this beast anyway before it gets taken out by an A2G missile or tank do you? HAHA if so your sadly mistaken
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
"WTF LOL" fucking nerd -.- and you stupid fuck think that other countrys doesnt have SPA systems? and remember that russian technology sucks when compared to countrys like usa, japan, german and so on
asease1234 2 years ago
I don't think you realize I posted this over a year ago. I don't even have a clue what I said. But looks like you use Google a lot. Go you.
SpaceAgeDiaper 2 years ago
But more importantly. You assume the US would blindly send tanks into an area with gunships, or even planes. You can't send in tanks by themselves. It is something that requires a co-op effort. I don't even really know what this argument is about. But I appreciate how you came at me like your the all knowing genius, along with that insulting me for no apparent reason. But if the whole discussion is one artillery piece, vs ANY tank. The tank would win every single time. Artillery fires INDIRECT
SpaceAgeDiaper 2 years ago
...rounds. While a tank moving a fuck ton faster, with a lot more agility than a falling piece of metal, could easily take out a stationary artillery unit. But of course this situation would never happen. So, since they wont. Bo point in stressing any further discussion. So drop it. Its YouTube Comments. Not Mcblind fuck be stupid happy go go time.
SpaceAgeDiaper 2 years ago
um did it just turn into a plow at 00:48? haha
sandinsx 4 years ago
cool
blacksoilder10 4 years ago