It's not about gender, it's about her doing the soft stuff in the mornings and now she's in the evening. It's a different ball game. Had Deborah Norville (the gal she replaced on the today show) done the evening news, she'd probably have done better.
I think people were just used to katie on Today! From 1991-2006! thats a long ass time to become accustomed! and then BAM! she's over to a night time broadcast..darker and more serious. She isn't cut out for it in my opinion...but kudos to her for trying. Its sad that its too late for her to go back. I think people like Meredith too much now. Katie is a celebrity now...too much for anchoring. Her time in the profession is over.
Katie's trip to Iraq was a joke at best, perhaps the biggest fluke assignment in journalism history. She was totally out of her element and I don't think she actually has an element.
Katie Couric should not be on CBS News. It has nothing to do with gender! For example, replace Katie with Paula Zahn or Elizabeth Vargas, the ratings would go up. A lot of people were upset when Bob Schiefer left. Also, quite a few responded to CBS website at their displeasure when CBS hired her. People simply DO NOT LIKE Katie Couric. She is not serious news journalism material, more like "fashion news" like the silly stuff she did on The Today Show.
pretigiousb03, while it is true that CBS's previous low ratings and bad reputation does precede them, you can't have it both ways. NBC's high morning ratings have always been there, and they are still there. Ratings are elusive for many reasons, but Katie is not part of any solution. She should never have been hired by NBC, much less CBS. Even her experience with CNN was mired by failure.
I'll bet that you Libs are on pins and needles about Katie Couric's trip to Iraq, aren't you? She'll go there, hang around the Green Zone for a couple days, and then come back with all of her "insights". When I was serving in Iraq, we called people like Katie "hotel reporters." You wouldn't see them in the Red Zone. :)
Nah, we hate her just as much as you do... or at least I do. I'm very liberal and I think she's little more than a silly windbag. She has no insight to offer, and no real reporting will be done. Bill at least has the balls to say something substantial/relevant instead of saying "Hi, I'm Katie Couric. Today in Iraq: puppies. Cute, or really really cute?"
Right, and you should realize how unprofessional and unethical that kind of immature and irresponsible behavior plays out in the real world. That's something that even cub reporters generally overcome before they even show up for journalism class. It isn't rocket science, but for Couric to have not yet learned impartially is equivalent to an astronaut that hasn't heard of a countdown.
The only thing worse than hiring Couric in the first place is continuing in denial until she takes the ship down with her. There are countless men and women in top television markets and networks that are much more qualified and experienced, no to mention more appealing and likeable to both the audience and to fellow journalists.
There are plenty of both men and women with all the qualifications and quality factors that would make them appealing. It's easy for Katie to blame it on audience prejudice, but that's unproductive spin. She is putting the final nail in the coffin for CBS as they spin and debate the issue, instead of correcting it. Until now, television stations and networks have dropped people and shows when they didn't perform. It's accountability time.
When you watch the news you want to hear a serious low voice that reflects the situation. All the great anchors were males except olberwoman or rather blather.
when people watch the news, they want to feel like they are listening to someone who knows what the are talking about. whatever one may have thought of the politics of brokaw/jennings/rather, they were serious journalists with global scope and insight. the current crop just does not have it, and couric is by far the worst of the three. put christiane amanopour or lara logan in the CBS anchor chair and that would be worth watching.
Indeed there are many qualifies women. Katie isn't one of them. She was an underperformer on the Today Show. While her ratings were declining even there, NBC had a very strong history in the morning with great affiliates, a high budget across the board, very strong and expensive marketing and advertising, a great lead-in and a strong continuous program lineup in the morning. She also had help with a co-anchor and even a tri-anchor in most cases. Now she is having to stand on her own.
First, Katie isn't cute, if that has anything to do with it. She has had many years of grooming, pampering and being consulted and outfitted with the best clothing and makeup. She still isn't as pretty as any other woman would be with such attention. If it were about looks, then there are plenty of beautiful actresses in all ages. The fact is she is unappealing, unqualified and unprofessional, not to mention being an underperformer.
I just wish they stop trying to blame it on gender bias. Anyone trying to blame it on gender bias must be freaking out of their mind. All they need to do is go on You Tube and see all the news videos with women in them to realize that.
I really don't think it's about Katie. It's about CBS. They are awful at presenting the news and that reputation precedes them. Katie isn't killing the show, she's just not bringing in bigger numbers than they already had. They were #3 in the past and they still are.
It's too easy for Katie too have her circumstances blamed on all women. Any one of these ladies being interviewed would make fantastic anchors. They really aren't hard to find. Surely CBS's research team would've discovered she wasn't for the job. And surely CBS will put her out of her misery before she drowns the network beyond survival.
Katie isn't even perky. She's an uninformed and unqualified loser with diaherra of the mouth. She might be okay for a sweatshop, but not for interviewing or reporting. She might make a good food server or shampoo girl.
"Kiran Chetny"! O'reilly doesn't even know the names of the people he's talking with, a fellow Fox employee, and we're supposed to give a shit what he has to say about Couric?
I agree 100% Julie Bandaras's last statement. I watch katie couric on CBS every night and love her but some for some reason the presentation is a bit boring. I think someone would much rather sit there for half an hour and watch katie couric rather than the other two news anchors on the other two networks.
This just in: Couric loses more viewers, but the spin doctors say she still has as many viewers as the average housewife. These women are so sensational and I'd look at them forever, but Couric? I think I have acid-reflux when I think of her.
I think women would rather see women and men would rather see women. We'd just don't want Katie. How about a journalist? Everything Katie knows about journalism could be written in ten feet letters with a wide paint brush on the back of a postage stamp. Diane Sawyer, Paula Zahn, Elizabeth Vargas and anyone else among serious journalists in the top twenty markets and cable would work well. Or hire 400 females at six figures for her salary.
Couric's ratings are down for many reasons. Many of them have to do with her. She is not a good interviewer, storyteller, or writer and her concerns are so trivial. For example, she spent a countless number of weeks worrying about how to say goodbye at he end of her cast. It doesn't matter now. Her audience bet her to it.
it has soething to do with the gender... see what happened Clinton didn't win
lennonusman 3 years ago
Okay, why are they talking about this on the air? How exactly is this news?
ludachris475 3 years ago
Katie has her nose so far up the leftwing ass. I don't watch her because of her lack of objectivity
floatpool 3 years ago
what? are you serious? you don't watch her bcoz you don't owned a TV set
lennonusman 3 years ago 4
And you don't own a thesarus or dictionary!
christopherduke 3 years ago
It's not about gender, it's about her doing the soft stuff in the mornings and now she's in the evening. It's a different ball game. Had Deborah Norville (the gal she replaced on the today show) done the evening news, she'd probably have done better.
dave4248 3 years ago
I think people were just used to katie on Today! From 1991-2006! thats a long ass time to become accustomed! and then BAM! she's over to a night time broadcast..darker and more serious. She isn't cut out for it in my opinion...but kudos to her for trying. Its sad that its too late for her to go back. I think people like Meredith too much now. Katie is a celebrity now...too much for anchoring. Her time in the profession is over.
lefteyez54 4 years ago
Either one of these girls would blow Couric away.
dangerdiabolic 4 years ago
Katie's trip to Iraq was a joke at best, perhaps the biggest fluke assignment in journalism history. She was totally out of her element and I don't think she actually has an element.
dangerdiabolic 4 years ago
Katie Couric should not be on CBS News. It has nothing to do with gender! For example, replace Katie with Paula Zahn or Elizabeth Vargas, the ratings would go up. A lot of people were upset when Bob Schiefer left. Also, quite a few responded to CBS website at their displeasure when CBS hired her. People simply DO NOT LIKE Katie Couric. She is not serious news journalism material, more like "fashion news" like the silly stuff she did on The Today Show.
orangespicevanilla 4 years ago
Katie doesn't belong on the evening news. Doesn't matter that she's a woman!
DesertLynx83 4 years ago
It has nothing to do with gender. Katie is a horrible anchor and ratings are proving that.
catpaws55423 4 years ago
pretigiousb03, while it is true that CBS's previous low ratings and bad reputation does precede them, you can't have it both ways. NBC's high morning ratings have always been there, and they are still there. Ratings are elusive for many reasons, but Katie is not part of any solution. She should never have been hired by NBC, much less CBS. Even her experience with CNN was mired by failure.
thruwayservice 4 years ago
I like Bill O'Reilly, but he really should have pronounced Kiran CHETRY correctly!
jcm061503 4 years ago
Good catch. "Karen Chutney". Someone should have given her a big cartoon hammer with which to set him straight.
spectator1920 4 years ago 6
I'll bet that you Libs are on pins and needles about Katie Couric's trip to Iraq, aren't you? She'll go there, hang around the Green Zone for a couple days, and then come back with all of her "insights". When I was serving in Iraq, we called people like Katie "hotel reporters." You wouldn't see them in the Red Zone. :)
CastorT64 4 years ago
Nah, we hate her just as much as you do... or at least I do. I'm very liberal and I think she's little more than a silly windbag. She has no insight to offer, and no real reporting will be done. Bill at least has the balls to say something substantial/relevant instead of saying "Hi, I'm Katie Couric. Today in Iraq: puppies. Cute, or really really cute?"
radiofan6872 4 years ago
Right, and you should realize how unprofessional and unethical that kind of immature and irresponsible behavior plays out in the real world. That's something that even cub reporters generally overcome before they even show up for journalism class. It isn't rocket science, but for Couric to have not yet learned impartially is equivalent to an astronaut that hasn't heard of a countdown.
nmrose 4 years ago
The only thing worse than hiring Couric in the first place is continuing in denial until she takes the ship down with her. There are countless men and women in top television markets and networks that are much more qualified and experienced, no to mention more appealing and likeable to both the audience and to fellow journalists.
nmrose 4 years ago
katie couric is an extremely bad interviewer because she cannot conceal her personal views enough to remain impartial.
She once giggled in an interview with
relarerfhjk 4 years ago 3
There are plenty of both men and women with all the qualifications and quality factors that would make them appealing. It's easy for Katie to blame it on audience prejudice, but that's unproductive spin. She is putting the final nail in the coffin for CBS as they spin and debate the issue, instead of correcting it. Until now, television stations and networks have dropped people and shows when they didn't perform. It's accountability time.
viszeau 4 years ago
When you watch the news you want to hear a serious low voice that reflects the situation. All the great anchors were males except olberwoman or rather blather.
Northgrant 4 years ago
when people watch the news, they want to feel like they are listening to someone who knows what the are talking about. whatever one may have thought of the politics of brokaw/jennings/rather, they were serious journalists with global scope and insight. the current crop just does not have it, and couric is by far the worst of the three. put christiane amanopour or lara logan in the CBS anchor chair and that would be worth watching.
verylongdong 4 years ago
Indeed there are many qualifies women. Katie isn't one of them. She was an underperformer on the Today Show. While her ratings were declining even there, NBC had a very strong history in the morning with great affiliates, a high budget across the board, very strong and expensive marketing and advertising, a great lead-in and a strong continuous program lineup in the morning. She also had help with a co-anchor and even a tri-anchor in most cases. Now she is having to stand on her own.
nmrose 4 years ago
First, Katie isn't cute, if that has anything to do with it. She has had many years of grooming, pampering and being consulted and outfitted with the best clothing and makeup. She still isn't as pretty as any other woman would be with such attention. If it were about looks, then there are plenty of beautiful actresses in all ages. The fact is she is unappealing, unqualified and unprofessional, not to mention being an underperformer.
nmrose 4 years ago
Katie Couric is cute as hell, but she's no journalist. I'll be surprised if she survives the '08 election before they pull the plug on her as anchor.
dncott 4 years ago
I just wish they stop trying to blame it on gender bias. Anyone trying to blame it on gender bias must be freaking out of their mind. All they need to do is go on You Tube and see all the news videos with women in them to realize that.
lonnyt01 4 years ago
I really don't think it's about Katie. It's about CBS. They are awful at presenting the news and that reputation precedes them. Katie isn't killing the show, she's just not bringing in bigger numbers than they already had. They were #3 in the past and they still are.
prestigiousb03 4 years ago
Why all the Katie Couric haters?? She seems so nice. She's beautiful. She is good at her job!
smrgrl5 4 years ago
It's too easy for Katie too have her circumstances blamed on all women. Any one of these ladies being interviewed would make fantastic anchors. They really aren't hard to find. Surely CBS's research team would've discovered she wasn't for the job. And surely CBS will put her out of her misery before she drowns the network beyond survival.
seasonologist 4 years ago
Katie isn't even perky. She's an uninformed and unqualified loser with diaherra of the mouth. She might be okay for a sweatshop, but not for interviewing or reporting. She might make a good food server or shampoo girl.
seasonologist 4 years ago
Katie....please go away! She's so, well, PERKY! Yeah, that's the word!
Crackerscat1 4 years ago
All the "majors" are losing audience. They are dinosaurs.
It has nothing to do with "gender bias".
hellotimetogo 4 years ago
"Kiran Chetny"! O'reilly doesn't even know the names of the people he's talking with, a fellow Fox employee, and we're supposed to give a shit what he has to say about Couric?
deathbotv1 4 years ago
O'Liely is a real idiot ! He has Foot and Mouth Disease !
hankcampbell 4 years ago
Did O'Reilly just say "dough"?
lol
soleeah 4 years ago
I agree 100% Julie Bandaras's last statement. I watch katie couric on CBS every night and love her but some for some reason the presentation is a bit boring. I think someone would much rather sit there for half an hour and watch katie couric rather than the other two news anchors on the other two networks.
rewind16 4 years ago
he said kiran chutny
gorgonwhora 4 years ago 2
Kiran is now the new morning anchor on CNN's 'American Morning'
malone42 4 years ago
Kiran Chetry is hot..i cant believe she was born in nepal
401blackdeath 4 years ago
Whoa. How did I miss Kiran on O'reilly. What a hot honey.
aitraining 4 years ago
This just in: Couric loses more viewers, but the spin doctors say she still has as many viewers as the average housewife. These women are so sensational and I'd look at them forever, but Couric? I think I have acid-reflux when I think of her.
sirvonron 4 years ago
I think women would rather see women and men would rather see women. We'd just don't want Katie. How about a journalist? Everything Katie knows about journalism could be written in ten feet letters with a wide paint brush on the back of a postage stamp. Diane Sawyer, Paula Zahn, Elizabeth Vargas and anyone else among serious journalists in the top twenty markets and cable would work well. Or hire 400 females at six figures for her salary.
sirvonron 4 years ago
Any one of these women would soar in the ratings. They appear so smooth and savvy.
sirvonron 4 years ago
I've always heard that television is about ratings. If that is true, why is Couric still there?
sirvonron 4 years ago
Couric's ratings are down for many reasons. Many of them have to do with her. She is not a good interviewer, storyteller, or writer and her concerns are so trivial. For example, she spent a countless number of weeks worrying about how to say goodbye at he end of her cast. It doesn't matter now. Her audience bet her to it.
vonronshultz 4 years ago