Mixed feelings here, firstly why do we blame the pilots, it's all to do with their lack of communication that gets our men killed. However despite us having a fair amount of support and excellent communication skills with our pilots we simply do not have enough of them so we should all be grateful for one another, we are brothers and accidents do happen. However carelessness
@Disaveli no it's not. I brought it up because there seems to be a few brits thinking the USA Friendly fires all the damn time. Pointing out that it was the British that started using the word Friendly fire back in the 1700's a example would be at Waterloo where they open fired on the Prussians mistaking them for French.
theres an old ww2 joke saying if the british fired, the german ducked. when the german fired, the british ducked. but when the americans fired everyone effin ducked!
@sawyerbobby When the explosions happen first - then you hear the sound of the rounds being fired (that roaring zipper-like sound) it means you're downrange in the target area. This is why you never hear the one that hits you. The A-10 had a really bad line of fire. He should have came over their location and fired in the other direction.
I agree that having US pilots in there air is more benificial, but so many coalition soldiers have been killed by US forces. It cant just be bad luck and circumstance, in my view Americans are a bit too "gun ho". I read somewhere that they are training US soldiers to recognise the Union Flag (British Flag).
@Driscoll890 The fact that 95% of air-cover was provided by USAF, chances are there's going to be a blue on blue rate from that. The US pilots always relied on Intel and British FAC for help. And Brits often killed 16 of their own forces, 2 danish, and 3 afghans, most of them ground to ground. US ground troops are hardly trigger happy because we're so good not hitting our allies a lot even our own. We're talking different types of incidents here. Even Iraq/Afghan has the lowest FF in history
the subject of this vid is wrong., watcht he whole vid please ppl the Brits are calling in Air Support and American pilot just brought it in a tad close but nobody was hurt,
What the hell was it shooting at? I mean even if it thought they were Taliban it still missed. Or it knew about the brits and just fuckn slipped on the trigger.
yeah and without British and other Allied Help where would The US be in this?? on they fucking own with their poorly trained soldiers, This is what yanks do kill Friendlies You have more chnce of getting killed by an American in Afghanistan than by the Taliban!
No disrespect love American's,But my father was in the 8th Army ,a Desert Rat during the 2nd World war and even he jokes about USAF pilots lack of fire Discipline,this is nothing new lol
although this air assault missed the Brits there have been many, too many incidents where the U.S. air-force has mistakenly targeted and killed British ground troops and convoys. Does any one know the exact figure of British troops killed by American air-power since 9/11. I would be interested to know the figures.??
elitepoosniff, that blue on blue in the first gulf war was two warrior apc,s full of troops from the scottish division, not only did they have nato markings they also had a nato transponder to prevent this happening in the vehicles, and the cunts still shot and killed them!! trigger happy badly trained rednecks that have watch too many war movies!! take alook at there you tube videos, glorifying war and killing, to them its just a computer game!!!!
The warrior armoured vehicles were infact from the 3rd Bn The Royal Fusiliers battle group . The two warriors were C Coy vehicles and 9 soldiers were killed 6 from the fusiliers and 3 from the Queens own highlanders. They never had transponders then although the vehilces were marked with orange panels. The incident took place on the re org after taking the objective. How do I know as one of teh guys there is standing next to me as I write this!
US fucking need to teach there armed forces how to do a simple job if your trained well to do Right ! you would never Ever see British Armed forces having blue on blue`s maby once ever cuple of years maby america just way to Much !
dropping bombs isn't a simple job. if you had 60,000 troops in afghanistan and 100,000 in iraq, you'd probably have a few blue on blues also. instead you have 9,500 total.
tere was a blue on blue in iraq with two A 10`s , they shot at two British trucks that where marked the the NATO orange marker that tells air units that its friendly even from the cockpit video you can see them and they still fired at them and killed some of Our Troops im slowly tearning anti American
Yeah except... we don't actually kill americans in afghanistan, your pilots do the business most of the time, but most blue on blue incidents would be avoided with simple communication
but we have the raf and the harrier strike force to help out the ground troops,
us airforce are just all in shoot and take out bunkers and afgan ,taliban hideouts to flush them out, us dont support much but themselfs thease days lol, mabey get the few that do but its rare it wud be to help some one out lol
@ricksimmonds I'm not sure who you're referring to, but... there are alot of people in the states that get up on their boxes and start shouting out how great the US are, and how much the UK has benefited from the US. I agree with both sides here, I think that the US are responsible for more friendly fire incidents than all other nations linked, though if you ask any british squaddie (except for the blue on blue dead ones of course), they will all say they are glad to have you up in the skies.
I think youve hit it on the nail mate,if you watch Ross Kemp in Aghanistan ,even after the notorious friendly fire incident of 2007 where 3 members of the Royal Anglian Regt was killed by US Friendly Fire, the troops interviewed where very proffesional and blamed no one- US Pilots have saved more lives than they have taken
@ricksimmonds My canadian and british boys wouldnt have been in afganistan if it wasnt for your redneck bush mate,I know 4 soldiers and their families who were killed by the so "Called" Taliban you americans created,Lol you guys are doing what happened with the Cossacks,Cept you need to pay alot of nations to back your pretty american asses up,Lol
@ricksimmonds Royal Marine here pal........without BRITISH ....air support we'd be losing a lot more..not just American..yours in speaking..a Royal Marine who's been opened up on by US forces twice now.
@Hperman09 Believe me given the choice i would but i dont make the rules or ROE's while on ops. Given teh choice i'd have preferred the RAF, FAA of Britain or the Dutch Air Force by miles. Trustowrthy accurate CAS by a country mile.
RIP Tony. Stabilis
HerrickViking 6 days ago
Parr
FISRTGOAT 1 month ago
Mixed feelings here, firstly why do we blame the pilots, it's all to do with their lack of communication that gets our men killed. However despite us having a fair amount of support and excellent communication skills with our pilots we simply do not have enough of them so we should all be grateful for one another, we are brothers and accidents do happen. However carelessness
FISRTGOAT 1 month ago
Miscommunication kills my friends.
Alextillom 1 month ago
@Disaveli I know, didn't want to say it. I was trying to tell the guy the FF happens in wars. but he was just trolling
Dogmeat1950 8 months ago
@Disaveli no it's not. I brought it up because there seems to be a few brits thinking the USA Friendly fires all the damn time. Pointing out that it was the British that started using the word Friendly fire back in the 1700's a example would be at Waterloo where they open fired on the Prussians mistaking them for French.
Dogmeat1950 8 months ago
trust a yank to shoot at friendly's
starzscream614 9 months ago
I love the way they call it "Friendly Fire"......Can't get more "Unfriendly" :o)
cyborgigy 9 months ago
theres an old ww2 joke saying if the british fired, the german ducked. when the german fired, the british ducked. but when the americans fired everyone effin ducked!
13elsyd13 10 months ago 2
It's a nice depleted uranium shower they took! An Afghanistan War Syndrome in the making!!
er1cav 1 year ago
Comment removed
er1cav 1 year ago
Man, too close for comfort. I really hope you guys all made it back to your families safely.
MattHeaven 1 year ago
the plane is so far away it takes a while for the sound of the weapon to reach the soldiers
Alex555666555 1 year ago
so what sound comes first again,the bullets exploding then gun firing itself? or is there like a sonicboom first
sawyerbobby 1 year ago
@sawyerbobby When the explosions happen first - then you hear the sound of the rounds being fired (that roaring zipper-like sound) it means you're downrange in the target area. This is why you never hear the one that hits you. The A-10 had a really bad line of fire. He should have came over their location and fired in the other direction.
1Thrufire 1 year ago
The pilot was probably just messing you the brits. lol There are accurate.
PhippyPoo 1 year ago
@PhippyPoo
I bet these boys didnt see the funny side he he
skinnymason 1 year ago 5
@PhippyPoo if they're as accurate as your grammar we're all in big trouble :s
bloodforfeathers 6 months ago
@bloodforfeathers My apologies to the English teacher....... Fag.
PhippyPoo 6 months ago
@PhippyPoo no worries, just remember whose language you're speaking next time ... hahaha
bloodforfeathers 3 months ago
Fook me that was close!!
lordofbore 1 year ago
Known and knew*
TrentEdwardSlippery 1 year ago
Well at least we know what it's like to be on the other side. :P
EXAir113 1 year ago
This is why communication is vital.
EXAir113 1 year ago
I agree that having US pilots in there air is more benificial, but so many coalition soldiers have been killed by US forces. It cant just be bad luck and circumstance, in my view Americans are a bit too "gun ho". I read somewhere that they are training US soldiers to recognise the Union Flag (British Flag).
Driscoll890 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 1 year ago
@Driscoll890 The fact that 95% of air-cover was provided by USAF, chances are there's going to be a blue on blue rate from that. The US pilots always relied on Intel and British FAC for help. And Brits often killed 16 of their own forces, 2 danish, and 3 afghans, most of them ground to ground. US ground troops are hardly trigger happy because we're so good not hitting our allies a lot even our own. We're talking different types of incidents here. Even Iraq/Afghan has the lowest FF in history
publicmario17 1 year ago
the subject of this vid is wrong., watcht he whole vid please ppl the Brits are calling in Air Support and American pilot just brought it in a tad close but nobody was hurt,
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
What the hell was it shooting at? I mean even if it thought they were Taliban it still missed. Or it knew about the brits and just fuckn slipped on the trigger.
SonicSidewinder 1 year ago
yeah and without British and other Allied Help where would The US be in this?? on they fucking own with their poorly trained soldiers, This is what yanks do kill Friendlies You have more chnce of getting killed by an American in Afghanistan than by the Taliban!
Fuckthemutherfuckers 1 year ago
@Fuckthemutherfuckers . true history fact. British have killed more allies then anyone else in the last 200 years.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950 PFT!
Fuckthemutherfuckers 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950
No disrespect love American's,But my father was in the 8th Army ,a Desert Rat during the 2nd World war and even he jokes about USAF pilots lack of fire Discipline,this is nothing new lol
funkyfenman 1 year ago
@funkyfenman um..there was no USAF during ww2
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950
ok American pilots ,smart arse
funkyfenman 1 year ago
LOL, yes there was!
blueb0g 1 year ago
@blueb0g um no dummy there was no USAF in WW2
USAF was created in 1948.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
The USAF became a seperate entity in 1947 but it existed before as a part of the army.
blueb0g 1 year ago
@blueb0g that was the USAAC was the U.S Army. whole different animal.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@blueb0g im not too sure on that one where did you get your info from im not starting a fight i would just like to know cheers
dean11081988 1 year ago
@funkyfenman they jsuted to make sure all the nazi's and what not are all dead. :)
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
although this air assault missed the Brits there have been many, too many incidents where the U.S. air-force has mistakenly targeted and killed British ground troops and convoys. Does any one know the exact figure of British troops killed by American air-power since 9/11. I would be interested to know the figures.??
Patrick5009 2 years ago
Something in the region of 20-50 with many more injured. USAF Pilots think they're playing CoD
1888Jackson 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 1 year ago
elitepoosniff, that blue on blue in the first gulf war was two warrior apc,s full of troops from the scottish division, not only did they have nato markings they also had a nato transponder to prevent this happening in the vehicles, and the cunts still shot and killed them!! trigger happy badly trained rednecks that have watch too many war movies!! take alook at there you tube videos, glorifying war and killing, to them its just a computer game!!!!
dirkwang1 2 years ago
The warrior armoured vehicles were infact from the 3rd Bn The Royal Fusiliers battle group . The two warriors were C Coy vehicles and 9 soldiers were killed 6 from the fusiliers and 3 from the Queens own highlanders. They never had transponders then although the vehilces were marked with orange panels. The incident took place on the re org after taking the objective. How do I know as one of teh guys there is standing next to me as I write this!
allthefours44 2 years ago
US fucking need to teach there armed forces how to do a simple job if your trained well to do Right ! you would never Ever see British Armed forces having blue on blue`s maby once ever cuple of years maby america just way to Much !
Elitepoosniff 2 years ago
dropping bombs isn't a simple job. if you had 60,000 troops in afghanistan and 100,000 in iraq, you'd probably have a few blue on blues also. instead you have 9,500 total.
merks91 2 years ago
tere was a blue on blue in iraq with two A 10`s , they shot at two British trucks that where marked the the NATO orange marker that tells air units that its friendly even from the cockpit video you can see them and they still fired at them and killed some of Our Troops im slowly tearning anti American
Elitepoosniff 2 years ago
@merks91
Yeah except... we don't actually kill americans in afghanistan, your pilots do the business most of the time, but most blue on blue incidents would be avoided with simple communication
1888Jackson 2 years ago
either very lucky or very good CAS
cnknguyen 2 years ago
fuck they are lucky not many people get shot at by an a-10 and live im just glad they survived
rainhamendgill 2 years ago
whats the sound after the impact.like a weird animal kinda sound! lol
adambc5 2 years ago
it was the sound of the gun fireing
Elitepoosniff 2 years ago
but we have the raf and the harrier strike force to help out the ground troops,
us airforce are just all in shoot and take out bunkers and afgan ,taliban hideouts to flush them out, us dont support much but themselfs thease days lol, mabey get the few that do but its rare it wud be to help some one out lol
666antares1 2 years ago
Mmmm a fine mist of reactor fuel waste used to make the damn bullets. Bet those poor bastards will get cancer like many others.
N4CR5 2 years ago
Yanks are fucking idiots. No wonder everyone has deserted them. They're moronic cunts.
MarshallKutuzov 2 years ago
you know nothing you worthless prick
without american air support in afghanistan bristish fatalities would be ALOT higher
next time you go to say something fucking stupid like that again mate, do me a favour, and jump of a fucking cliff first
ricksimmonds 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck you, you idiot warmongering wanker.
MarshallKutuzov 2 years ago
acsidents happen these guys are under stress to find identify and fight its not as easy as you think at 5000 feet
dean11081988 2 years ago
the guy has a point u know with out dem more troops will be dying
ninja886 2 years ago 10
@ricksimmonds I'm not sure who you're referring to, but... there are alot of people in the states that get up on their boxes and start shouting out how great the US are, and how much the UK has benefited from the US. I agree with both sides here, I think that the US are responsible for more friendly fire incidents than all other nations linked, though if you ask any british squaddie (except for the blue on blue dead ones of course), they will all say they are glad to have you up in the skies.
jessie11982 1 year ago
@jessie11982
I think youve hit it on the nail mate,if you watch Ross Kemp in Aghanistan ,even after the notorious friendly fire incident of 2007 where 3 members of the Royal Anglian Regt was killed by US Friendly Fire, the troops interviewed where very proffesional and blamed no one- US Pilots have saved more lives than they have taken
funkyfenman 1 year ago
@ricksimmonds My canadian and british boys wouldnt have been in afganistan if it wasnt for your redneck bush mate,I know 4 soldiers and their families who were killed by the so "Called" Taliban you americans created,Lol you guys are doing what happened with the Cossacks,Cept you need to pay alot of nations to back your pretty american asses up,Lol
TrentEdwardSlippery 1 year ago
@ricksimmonds Royal Marine here pal........without BRITISH ....air support we'd be losing a lot more..not just American..yours in speaking..a Royal Marine who's been opened up on by US forces twice now.
LCStreetPhotographer 1 year ago
@LCStreetPhotographer then get your own air-support and quit asking us to do it.
Hperman09 1 year ago
@Hperman09 Believe me given the choice i would but i dont make the rules or ROE's while on ops. Given teh choice i'd have preferred the RAF, FAA of Britain or the Dutch Air Force by miles. Trustowrthy accurate CAS by a country mile.
LCStreetPhotographer 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 1 year ago
@LCStreetPhotographer well ok then if you want then write to your queen to stop relying our air-support.
Hperman09 1 year ago
@Hperman09 A country that thinks Britain is ruled and governed by the queen shouldn't be allowed weapons. You're dangerously retarded.
LordLolinghamThe3rd 11 months ago
@ricksimmonds 3 royal anglians died from a 500lb US fighter bomb :( RIP
MattTrezzi13 3 months ago