To the second top comment about "immobile objects". If you realized that 2 cars on a normal road going 96km/h or 60mp/h in opposite directions (a normal highway). There speeds are added together when they crash head on. So if 2 cars hit going opposite directions doing the speed limit above it would total 192km/h or 120mp/h (60mp/h or 96km/h x2). Which means this is what your gonna look like if you don't speed hitting head to head on a normal high way.
theres a little thing called a GOVERNOR. its been built into the engines of most ford cars since around 1995. the governor limmits a cars top speed to a programmed certain amout. that focus and most other family cars cannot reach that speed.
This looks that bad because the crash was against an immobile object such as a concrete wall. It would be better to crash the car against something mobile and deformable such as another car. And it has nothing to do with it being a "FORD". Every other car would probably look the same.
I saw the Lexus IS, which has hit the wall at 150-170 km / h near the entrance to the tunnel .... We could only identify the markings on the wheels! :-(
@atlneptun The outcome wouldn't be much better than this. Plus, this test can be seen as a simulated crash on a motorway, like when someone lost control and hit a bridge support or else...
most people don't crash in to a massive steel reinforced concrete block head on. if they do crash in it an object its something like a lamp pole. or the concrete barriers in the middle of the motorway which move a little when hit and people usually hit them at and angle deflecting the car of to the side. Lessening the force of the impact so I would like to see this crash with an angled concrete barrier
@Bizzare703 other cars while smash into that concrete and will look less than the metal-ball of shitey ass ford. Its a high speed crash yet not all the cars are as unsafe as the piece of shit called ford.
@mat967 could you please explain how kinetic energy is doubled in your case? Could you please compare the total k. energy of two cars travelling at 70 units vs one car at 100 units? Third law has nothing to do with this. We are discussing the results of the reactional forces. Collision of a car and a concrete wall is more elastic than two cars colliding each other. In the first case both bodies have a more tendancy to keep their initial kinetic energy than the other. Therefore the car keeps m
@oscarnovember its simply a fact that 2 cars at 70kph will have less damage than 1 at 100kph. hiting another car dont give more damage to your car than a wall...the total energy is doubled because there are 2 car in motion, so 2 time more kinetic energy, but its still the same because the impact is absorbed by the 2. the third law has everything to do with it. The other car simply act as a wall, in the end its the same deceleration
just go see the mythbusters video about 2 car crashing.
@mat967 It is not a fact moreover It is totally wrong.
2*(0,5*m*70,7 ^2)= 0,5*m*100^2
if you do not agree, this conversation is over. I am here to teach physics 101.
if you agree continue reading. Have you ever heard of elastic and inelastic collision?? If yes tell me which is more elastic, two cars colliding or a car crashing into a wall. Physics does not end with Newtonian laws. Have look into conservation of energy principle. Do not come to me with mythbusters.This is not myth but science.
@mat967 Moreover, it is not the same deceleration because of the elasticity difference. The reason of this is the difference between the energy dissipation rates between a wall and a car. A car is not a concrete wall when it is absorbing energy. No law says the energy is distributed equally when two objects collide. If that would be the case a rubber ball and a bowling ball would reach to the same height when bouncing from the ground. I hope you get it this time.
If those 2 cars crach into each other then you coud theoretically put a sheet of paper between the cars and the sheet of paper would not move. So 2 cars driving into each other would be comparable with 1 car driving into a concrete wall.
The second reason is that kinetic energy is kwadratic with speed and a car driving at 60mph would only have a quarter of the kinetic energy compared with the same car driven 120mph.
i beg to differ in the first paragraph. Two cars driving into each other would absorb much more energy than one car driving into a concrete wall regardless of the total kinetic energy. I mean, one car driving into a concrete wall at 100 kph would get much more damage than two cars driving into each other at 70 kph. Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete.
"regardless of the total kinetic energy" is a silly thing to say because that "total kinetic engergy" is the driving force of the crash. Kinetic energy in a car with a speed of 100[units] is more than double that than the kinetic energy in the same car driving 70[units].
If you compare 1 car driving into a wall with 2 cars driving into each other then the 2 cars have twice the amount of energy, and that energy has to be dissipated by twice as much metal.
@xchvcwryb "Regardless of total kinetic energy" is meant for whether it is low or high , it does not matter as long as the total energy is the same. Consider the example for god's sake before making comments. I quote once more >>>>> "I mean, one car driving into a concrete wall at 100 kph would get much more damage than two cars driving into each other at 70 kph. Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete " <<<<<<
Two cars at 70 kph have the same amount of energy of one car at 100 kph.
@oscarnovember I quote you: ¨Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete¨
false(for this example, not in physic). if 2 car crash into another, the total energy is doubled but that force also have to be divided between both cars. A car hitting a wall at a x speed would get (roughly) the same damage as 2 car hitting each other at that speed. All possible thanks to newton third law.
@xchvcwryb for you to understand, two cars at 70 kph have "roughly" the same amount of kinetic energy of one car at 100 kph. I'm not giving exact figures here. Just trying to make a point. So your energy content comparison (more than double assertion) isn't correct for the example i gave.
W sumie przy takiej prędkości to każdy samochód będzie tak wyglądał po uderzeniu... A to była prawie maksymalna jego prędkość. Macie rację, mogli chociaż felgi zdjąć, ale tam jest inny standard życia, więc mają to w dupie, kupi się drugie :D
Co ty piszesz! od kiedy prędkości sumują się ? jeśli jeden jedzie 90 i drugi np 100km/h to prędkość jest mniej więcej około 100km/h. I nie pisz takich rzeczy.
Oczywiście, że się sumują. Wiadomo, żeby uderzenie było porównywalne do uderzenia w ścianę przy 200km/h, musieliby się idealnie przodem płasko zderzyć, a i tak część energii od razu przejmą obydwa auta. Ale niezaprzeczalnie siła uderzenia będzie nieporównywalnie większa niż 100km/h. Właśnie dlatego tak wiele osób ginie na drogach, wystarczy 70 kontra 70 i już mamy gigantyczną siłę.
OCZYWIŚCIE, ŻE NIE. Polecam tobie byś Obejrzał pogromców mitów na Discovery :) był o tym program, sprawdzano uderzenia ze ścianą jak i dwoma samochodami jadącymi wprost na siebie z prędkością o ile pamiętam 70 km /h. WYNIK ? PRĘDKOŚCI NIE SUMUJĄ SIĘ.
Naprawdę nie wiedziałem, że murzyni potrafią być tacy szybcy... Przy prawie dwustu na godzinę w kilka milisekund ukradli zaje*iste felgi z przedniej osi, a włożyli jakieś rozje**ne :D nic tylko pozadrościć prędkości :D
Ku**a ale się sprasował.... ciekawe jak by wyglądał po takim wypadku samochód z silnikiem z tyłu? Tu wyraźnie widać że silnik oparł się aż o tylną oś O.o
если скорость в "форде" 90 км...и на встречу едущего камаза - 100км = это видео
KPAC0TA 12 hours ago
at 120mph, even if the car will not deform, the passenger will not withstand the force..
orika001 1 day ago
трансформер!
joon2015milenium 2 days ago
Thanks for the test,i'll drive that wall on some wheels,it will bump anything right away even if i go with 500 kilometers.
truebassB 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I could fix it no big deal....Ive had worse. As long as one of the rims is ok, its fixable.
MrTAGTONY 3 days ago
Comment removed
MrTAGTONY 3 days ago
You guys, I think it's totaled.
VWTDI92 3 days ago
@VWTDI92 really?
boberson33 11 hours ago
диски жалко
pochivlov 4 days ago
ебать всегда хотел что останется от машины при ударе на такой скорости...
pochivlov 4 days ago
aaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnndddddddddd your dead.
pumpkinpieguy77 4 days ago
i hope the people in the car are okay!
coley36595 5 days ago
whats the song at 0:48 ????
batmayn123 6 days ago
При 190 км в час, от любой новой машины останется консервная банка!
SuperPowerJet 6 days ago
szok...!!!!
LPA1981 1 week ago
อัดเป็นก้อนเลย....(OoO)
kingkongpound 1 week ago
Vaporaized ! : )
THEKINGOFSHOOTER 1 week ago
пиздец
ni83kolay 1 week ago
Focus.rar
max9bo 1 week ago 3
Да уж, развалило...
bagdan30 1 week ago
uwooo
liridontafa 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I WANNA SEE THE PASSENGERS
FCbarcelona11 1 week ago
He responds like a girl.
MobileSpies 1 week ago
best part.. it drove away :)
wrestlingfan65 1 week ago
guy acts like his grandmother was in the car
spewgilist 1 week ago
it doesnt matter how it held up anything above 40 mph to a sudden stop i do believe is not survivable.
NathansBackwoods 1 week ago
ЭТО НАЗЫВАТЬСЯ ПИЗДА РУЛЮ )))
Fil056OrbBottom 1 week ago
haha, the guy is all freakin out... uhh duh! If you hit any car at 120mph, it will crush lol, this actually did well considering...
erikhoeffner 2 weeks ago
Almost looked like it was going to transform into a smart car for a second.
ibainesy 2 weeks ago
1:05 The car was so scared it pissed itself!!
WhoWantsToKnow81 2 weeks ago 2
At 120 mph you will die even in a Leopard tank.
At this high speed the degree of deformation is irrelevant!
MirceaBv 2 weeks ago 2
120 miles per hour.
BABIAM 2 weeks ago
.
.
TheMrDrilon 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I think a toy car is better than ford....
thenenebello21 2 weeks ago
To the second top comment about "immobile objects". If you realized that 2 cars on a normal road going 96km/h or 60mp/h in opposite directions (a normal highway). There speeds are added together when they crash head on. So if 2 cars hit going opposite directions doing the speed limit above it would total 192km/h or 120mp/h (60mp/h or 96km/h x2). Which means this is what your gonna look like if you don't speed hitting head to head on a normal high way.
Toasti0 2 weeks ago
holy fuck
Adam19822000 2 weeks ago
Jesus christ.
LimitlessAeon619 2 weeks ago
i hate fifth gear everytime they destroy good cars
TheVansCBT 2 weeks ago
if two cars are colliding each other, the momentum would add up twice as big
luozk12345 2 weeks ago
@luozk12345
No, it won't. Take a physics class.
rubiks15 2 weeks ago
Ken and Barbie were fucked.
Brikkyz 2 weeks ago
i have gone that fast on the interstate in a chevy sonic this makes me glad i didnt crash i'd have to be peeled out of it
morderfoust 2 weeks ago
Compressed using winrar !!!!
luieq 2 weeks ago
If you crash like this..
1. get up
2. walk away
3. find your arm & leg
Simple :)
Swagg409 2 weeks ago
ta daaaaa u have a smart ;)
josefjoexerri 2 weeks ago
These guys in the UK should do that kind of testing on European cars instead. It creates a bad image for the US.
LouieGMDesign 3 weeks ago
0:00 Ford Focus
0:14 Ford Focus portable
tresktresk 3 weeks ago
Shave that hair in the back of your neck!
guachipiruli 3 weeks ago
That's why I always sit in the trunk... ;)
theroot1980 3 weeks ago 3
Do not pass go. Do not collect 200. Go straight to hell.
dasautomega 3 weeks ago
I want that camera.
EPR89 3 weeks ago
try volvo and lets see :)
vios131do 3 weeks ago
@vios131do poor wall
Chevdriver 3 weeks ago
theres a little thing called a GOVERNOR. its been built into the engines of most ford cars since around 1995. the governor limmits a cars top speed to a programmed certain amout. that focus and most other family cars cannot reach that speed.
xxXMusickXx 3 weeks ago
from Focus to Smart in .000068 milliseconds ;)
roberto16181 3 weeks ago 2
did he rip ass? 1:38
nuggetspl 3 weeks ago
Its all good.. No Worries.. A Focus will never see those speeds.. Even in a head-on. lol
Pct3ch 3 weeks ago
good wheels :)
MrLazynko 3 weeks ago
I wanna see the carfax
1Insanretard 3 weeks ago
not exist security for excess of speed. All cars the limit is maybe up 100km/h .
lampadasled 3 weeks ago
if this was hollywood the car would have exploded...
breaktobroken 3 weeks ago 2
OMG!!! que miedo.... conosco a gente muy irresponsable queconduce a esas velocidades porque es "divertido" y tiene esactamente el mismo auto ._.
94JavierAlejandro 3 weeks ago
Yes never drive into a wall at 120 mph.
mcleanartists 4 weeks ago 3
Focus.zip
Motozeby 4 weeks ago 127
@Motozeby LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!
hackfreak2k7 1 week ago
This would have actually been interesting had they used a proper car
scruffynerfherder90 4 weeks ago
This looks that bad because the crash was against an immobile object such as a concrete wall. It would be better to crash the car against something mobile and deformable such as another car. And it has nothing to do with it being a "FORD". Every other car would probably look the same.
atlneptun 4 weeks ago 39
@atlneptun but if the car was driving tward the ford it would have been a even harder impact
MegaRedneck74 2 weeks ago
@atlneptun it seems like u never went to school to know a about physics laws what an IDIOT....I feel sorry for u
thenenebello21 2 weeks ago
@atlneptun
My Brother Crashed his Bmw m5 and the car was not so much damaged....
tomekfor1 2 weeks ago
@atlneptun
I saw the Lexus IS, which has hit the wall at 150-170 km / h near the entrance to the tunnel .... We could only identify the markings on the wheels! :-(
grabcanovic 2 weeks ago
@atlneptun The outcome wouldn't be much better than this. Plus, this test can be seen as a simulated crash on a motorway, like when someone lost control and hit a bridge support or else...
SPTunnelMotor 1 week ago
@atlneptun plus it was going 120
iPood47 1 week ago
@atlneptun nah its a ford.
MIKECORTI 3 days ago
нихуя себе
Serj45673 1 month ago
ебать....
MsShabbit 1 month ago
My penis is titan
CSSPlayer777 1 month ago
Tutaj Polacy ! Przejmujemy ten film ! :D
YakovCopo 1 month ago 2
are the back wheel abailable i need those..
cvcalitos 1 month ago
I know why it the car got fucked so hard.. Look who was driving, a BLOND, WOMEN !
Bastib0o 1 month ago
Crash test expert.. Tony Pain... :o
Bastib0o 1 month ago
So this Is How They Make Smart Cars....
10newsrox 1 month ago
@10newsrox lmfao!!
bucketx 1 month ago
Did that car go into a different dimension in the dumpster?
f7snopro2o14 1 month ago
smart car is safer i think
Undetailed1 1 month ago
well, the wheel stil turns
vangelderresike 1 month ago
most people don't crash in to a massive steel reinforced concrete block head on. if they do crash in it an object its something like a lamp pole. or the concrete barriers in the middle of the motorway which move a little when hit and people usually hit them at and angle deflecting the car of to the side. Lessening the force of the impact so I would like to see this crash with an angled concrete barrier
RUMBALman4downunder 1 month ago
it so creepy O.e
Osagie014 1 month ago
@juanOG213 No, its why there are SPEED LIMITS.
KNGarver 1 month ago 2
its becuz its a ford, and ford sucks real bad
juanOG213 1 month ago
@juanOG213 no shit,take your "x" car an give them to make a test with the same speed in that concrete wall
Bizzare703 1 month ago
@Bizzare703 other cars while smash into that concrete and will look less than the metal-ball of shitey ass ford. Its a high speed crash yet not all the cars are as unsafe as the piece of shit called ford.
juanOG213 1 month ago
@juanOG213 At 190KM/hour, most, if not all vehicles will look like that. That is why speed limits are no where near that.
MaverickXeo 1 month ago
@MaverickXeo this is not why
aleksankazakov 4 weeks ago
nice shade! :P
king81604 1 month ago
3 euros for the back rims
poulinalexander 1 month ago
back wheel is ok
!!!xd
Myg6969 1 month ago
Продаю Ford Focus после небольшого дтп.
sergezao 1 month ago
i would buy the rear wheels :D
jokiiiiiiii 1 month ago
You think they wanna sell those wheels on the rear?
kwint 1 month ago
Juz z Malucha by wiecej zostalo ;)
BADKosior 1 month ago
This should be an advertisment for GoPro, survived the crash and kept recording!
Slitripper5000 1 month ago
physics baby!....there's no escape.
swedesam 1 month ago
now i know what to say to my mother in law to buy...thx
alzym1 1 month ago
@alzym1 that's horrible.
markhenderson123 1 month ago
@alzym1 haha
Peter24397 1 month ago
wyklepie się ;]
MrHayabusa92 1 month ago
400G
DecryptorV1 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
Je sais quel sera le premier investissement sur ma voiture : acheter d'excellents freins !!!
kevinbenoit92 1 month ago
@mat967 could you please explain how kinetic energy is doubled in your case? Could you please compare the total k. energy of two cars travelling at 70 units vs one car at 100 units? Third law has nothing to do with this. We are discussing the results of the reactional forces. Collision of a car and a concrete wall is more elastic than two cars colliding each other. In the first case both bodies have a more tendancy to keep their initial kinetic energy than the other. Therefore the car keeps m
oscarnovember 1 month ago
@oscarnovember its simply a fact that 2 cars at 70kph will have less damage than 1 at 100kph. hiting another car dont give more damage to your car than a wall...the total energy is doubled because there are 2 car in motion, so 2 time more kinetic energy, but its still the same because the impact is absorbed by the 2. the third law has everything to do with it. The other car simply act as a wall, in the end its the same deceleration
just go see the mythbusters video about 2 car crashing.
mat967 1 month ago
@mat967 It is not a fact moreover It is totally wrong.
2*(0,5*m*70,7 ^2)= 0,5*m*100^2
if you do not agree, this conversation is over. I am here to teach physics 101.
if you agree continue reading. Have you ever heard of elastic and inelastic collision?? If yes tell me which is more elastic, two cars colliding or a car crashing into a wall. Physics does not end with Newtonian laws. Have look into conservation of energy principle. Do not come to me with mythbusters.This is not myth but science.
oscarnovember 1 month ago
@oscarnovember ¨Do not come to me with mythbusters.This is not myth but science.¨
denying facts, im outta here.
mat967 1 month ago
@mat967 Moreover, it is not the same deceleration because of the elasticity difference. The reason of this is the difference between the energy dissipation rates between a wall and a car. A car is not a concrete wall when it is absorbing energy. No law says the energy is distributed equally when two objects collide. If that would be the case a rubber ball and a bowling ball would reach to the same height when bouncing from the ground. I hope you get it this time.
oscarnovember 1 month ago
can i have the rear rims ?
svenrs4 1 month ago
sądze że ibiza, corsa czy polo lepiej nie wyjdzie!!!
GALAXY090580 1 month ago
Purely beautiful!!
limp65 1 month ago
Remember that this is one car at 120, but on a road two cars can crash in about 60, and then the result can be similar to this, scary shit.
Jimpank90 1 month ago
@Jimpank90
No, this is not true for 2 reasons.
If those 2 cars crach into each other then you coud theoretically put a sheet of paper between the cars and the sheet of paper would not move. So 2 cars driving into each other would be comparable with 1 car driving into a concrete wall.
The second reason is that kinetic energy is kwadratic with speed and a car driving at 60mph would only have a quarter of the kinetic energy compared with the same car driven 120mph.
xchvcwryb 1 month ago
i beg to differ in the first paragraph. Two cars driving into each other would absorb much more energy than one car driving into a concrete wall regardless of the total kinetic energy. I mean, one car driving into a concrete wall at 100 kph would get much more damage than two cars driving into each other at 70 kph. Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete.
oscarnovember 1 month ago
@oscarnovember
"regardless of the total kinetic energy" is a silly thing to say because that "total kinetic engergy" is the driving force of the crash. Kinetic energy in a car with a speed of 100[units] is more than double that than the kinetic energy in the same car driving 70[units].
If you compare 1 car driving into a wall with 2 cars driving into each other then the 2 cars have twice the amount of energy, and that energy has to be dissipated by twice as much metal.
xchvcwryb 1 month ago
@xchvcwryb "Regardless of total kinetic energy" is meant for whether it is low or high , it does not matter as long as the total energy is the same. Consider the example for god's sake before making comments. I quote once more >>>>> "I mean, one car driving into a concrete wall at 100 kph would get much more damage than two cars driving into each other at 70 kph. Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete " <<<<<<
Two cars at 70 kph have the same amount of energy of one car at 100 kph.
oscarnovember 1 month ago
@oscarnovember I quote you: ¨Metal always dissipates energy better than concrete¨
false(for this example, not in physic). if 2 car crash into another, the total energy is doubled but that force also have to be divided between both cars. A car hitting a wall at a x speed would get (roughly) the same damage as 2 car hitting each other at that speed. All possible thanks to newton third law.
mat967 1 month ago
@xchvcwryb for you to understand, two cars at 70 kph have "roughly" the same amount of kinetic energy of one car at 100 kph. I'm not giving exact figures here. Just trying to make a point. So your energy content comparison (more than double assertion) isn't correct for the example i gave.
oscarnovember 1 month ago
Ford_Focus.rar
pikczu2288 1 month ago 4
Ok!.
Now if you want to kill yourself, you can participate in this crashtest.
santimartupaco 1 month ago
Gives new meaning to the phrase, "Honey, I've shrunk the kids."
ryn1010 1 month ago
@ryn1010
how?
If he would be dead too.
santimartupaco 1 month ago
Great comment
1:42
Reminds me of a piece of lyrics from a good Depeche Mode song (Tora Tora Tora).
Watcher3223 1 month ago
Transformer at 1:12
vdbvideo 1 month ago
merak edenler için süper test olmuş.
nitromurat 1 month ago
Now i wanna put more foot down.
thepricylon 2 months ago
W sumie przy takiej prędkości to każdy samochód będzie tak wyglądał po uderzeniu... A to była prawie maksymalna jego prędkość. Macie rację, mogli chociaż felgi zdjąć, ale tam jest inny standard życia, więc mają to w dupie, kupi się drugie :D
pacmanek100 2 months ago
пиздец котлета
nikonovne 2 months ago
ehh is just a scratch no biggie ,
ThatOneCoolGuy1 3 months ago
Szkoda fokusika ... a najbardziej Felg ;p xD Ale przypierdolił
thekolo1414 3 months ago
focus.zip
Hriclesoliver 3 months ago 25
@Hriclesoliver HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
focus.zip kkkkk
BlogDoYgor 3 months ago
Impressionante....
lundstedt 3 months ago
damn piss of art:((
ditobaut 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cosa asy !
TheIshitto 3 months ago
Coza asy !
TheIshitto 3 months ago
Mogli chociaż felgi ściągnąć...
Errapee 3 months ago 10
A w Polsce jako bez wypadkowy ;D
boczek0015 3 months ago 15
Ja jebie niezle
Out5id3rr 3 months ago
Ale pierdolnął
DoobryWariat 3 months ago
oh
JaRiotCZ 3 months ago
190 km/h é suicidio.....
michellamiranda 3 months ago
Comment removed
KOMaRKKo 3 months ago
@KOMaRKKo
Co ty piszesz! od kiedy prędkości sumują się ? jeśli jeden jedzie 90 i drugi np 100km/h to prędkość jest mniej więcej około 100km/h. I nie pisz takich rzeczy.
pankracy212 3 months ago
@pankracy212
Oczywiście, że się sumują. Wiadomo, żeby uderzenie było porównywalne do uderzenia w ścianę przy 200km/h, musieliby się idealnie przodem płasko zderzyć, a i tak część energii od razu przejmą obydwa auta. Ale niezaprzeczalnie siła uderzenia będzie nieporównywalnie większa niż 100km/h. Właśnie dlatego tak wiele osób ginie na drogach, wystarczy 70 kontra 70 i już mamy gigantyczną siłę.
mdolnicki 3 months ago
@mdolnicki
OCZYWIŚCIE, ŻE NIE. Polecam tobie byś Obejrzał pogromców mitów na Discovery :) był o tym program, sprawdzano uderzenia ze ścianą jak i dwoma samochodami jadącymi wprost na siebie z prędkością o ile pamiętam 70 km /h. WYNIK ? PRĘDKOŚCI NIE SUMUJĄ SIĘ.
pankracy212 3 months ago
dsfkou dfiudf lrstgsph; posrthlsg rt sdry6 dx rxdgng
420hih 3 months ago
Naprawdę nie wiedziałem, że murzyni potrafią być tacy szybcy... Przy prawie dwustu na godzinę w kilka milisekund ukradli zaje*iste felgi z przedniej osi, a włożyli jakieś rozje**ne :D nic tylko pozadrościć prędkości :D
kamikadze20063 3 months ago
Się wypuka i bedzie jak nowy. też mi wielkie halo
kchret87 4 months ago
Ku**a ale się sprasował.... ciekawe jak by wyglądał po takim wypadku samochód z silnikiem z tyłu? Tu wyraźnie widać że silnik oparł się aż o tylną oś O.o
mroziak9204 4 months ago
Osoba w bagażniku miała by szanse
Hitman4215 4 months ago
Kto z mistrzów??:)
Pamiętajcie ,,nie jeździjcie szybciej niż lata wasz anioł stróż"
dareczek106 4 months ago
Cytując:
Focus.zip
trzmaster 4 months ago
o kuRRwa
BigKostuha 4 months ago 3