While researching a documentary, Shane O'Sullivan discovered a news film of the Ambassador Hotel on the day Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated. Bradley E. Ayers and other people who knew them, identified CIA agents David Sanchez Morales, Gordon Campbell and George Joannides as being three men in the hotel that day. An article about this story appeared in The Guardian and on BBC Newsnight on 20th November, 2006.
RFK would have opened a real investigation of JFK's murder if he had been elected.Someone wasnt about to allow that.The murder of RFK cleared the way for Nixon who was the puppet of Prescott Bush.
security guard behind rfk pulled his gun out and also started shooting, i wonder if he shot RFK by accident or on purpose, remember sirhans gun capacity was 8 bullets, about 13 shots were heard
In this video, you can see how Sirhan actually got behind Kennedy. The man being interviewed is facing the camera, then at 4:29 he turns.Supposedly that is exactly what Kennedy did just before the shots where fired. When questioned as to why he did'nt shoot RFK between the eyes, Sirhan responded" At the last second the SOB turned his head". Kennedy then leaned backbackwards to protect himself, explaining the angle of the shots. Still; how was it that Sirhan happened to be in the kitchen??
Sirhan never got behind Kennedy according to the witnesses present during the shooting. And the quote you attribute to Sirhan never took place. Writer Dan Moldea claimed Sirhan said that (supposedly delivered to him thirdhand, from Robert Kaiser who got it from Mike McCowan). Sirhan & his brother Adel who was present during McCowan's interviews with Sirhan deny that Sirhan ever said that. "I flatly deny making the statement Moldea ascribes to me in his book" More: tinyurlDOTcom/5v967m
@StevenM818 Your right, I've always understood Sirhan never got behind RFK. What I meant was; that is how it APPEARED ( @ 4:29)...... Sirhan got behind RFK. My mistake in the wording. Kennedy's movements made it seem like he got shot from behind even though the bullets where fired from the front. If Sirhans comments are not true " At the last moment the SOB turned". Then only God knows what happened that night. I'm arguiing from the point of view as to how it was Sirhan. Thank you.
You're very welcome. That quote pops up from time to time but hasn't been proven (by a signed affidavit from a witness who heard Sirhan say it, which Moldea apparently said he can provide, but hasn't last I checked), or a recording of Sirhan making the claim. What I do know is Sirhan says he never made the claim, & witnesses have confirmed that. @ 4:29 that's Karl Uecker talking. Either way, the coroner said the gun was about an inch away from RFKs head. Sirhan's gun was several feet.
Yeah the powder burns are a definite point of conflict. The thing I just can't understand is; if the powder burns are present, then someone put gun barrel behind RFK's head. Sirhan was'nt that someone as he never go that close. Should'nt THAT be the focal point of the investigation....now you know there was a second gunman.
This guy Cesar sold the revolver in question long after the assassination and investigation. Why hang on to the murder weapon that long?
I realize that there are facets of this murder that are not clear cut, but, as with the JFK assassination, if you look at the facts and actually do some research into this, you'll find that the named killer (in this case Sirhan) did it, and that there likely was no conspiracy.
The autopsy report showed that the bullets that killed RFK came from BEHIND him from a low angle & shot upward. Sirhan was facing RFK, who also had gunpowder burns behind his ear, indicating the shot was fired from a short distance behind him. Furthermore, subsequent investigation proved there were 13 shots fired; Sirhan's pistol had an 8-shot limit, plus it was incapable of the rapidity of the shots fired. There's overwhelming evidence that Sirhan's bullets were not the ones that killed RFK.
Did you hear that the real killer may of worked with the CIA? When I did, I thought to myself, 'Could it have been E. Howard Hunt?' Considering that not only was behind Watergate, but he was in Dallas when Robert Kennedy's brother was killed. And it doesn't stop there: I believe that Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the at-the-time California governor Ronald Reagan (three Presidents in other words) were in the plot to kill Robert Kennedy so that he wouldn't get to the White House.
Cesar was a guy who deserved a much closer look, to put it mildly. Naturally, no one ever did. He's the exact type of guy who would have been shooting at JFK in Dallas.
Divine intervention means God too has sent and will send those responsible for this cold blooded murder of a man of many children whom was ALSO the father of many children, straight to the fiery depths of hell for all time.....period.
Wow. For the JFK assassination, a policeman accidentally left his motorcycle radio on and recorded four gunshots, whose locations were analyzed and coincidentally, three came from the book depository, and one from the grassy knoll. It really is NOT difficult to trace the source of rifle shots. Now, some guy, again, accidentally, left his tape recorder on and recorded RFK's assassination, and what did the evidence turn up? Yup. Personally, I'm thinking divine intervention. ;)
Check out all the other YouTube videos also dealing with the subject of Stanislaw Pruszynski's audio recording of the RFK assassination.
All these other videos can be found by entering three key search words into the YouTube search window. These three search words are: Pruszynski Van Praag
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
IT'S REAL!
Sept11Discovery 1 month ago
While researching a documentary, Shane O'Sullivan discovered a news film of the Ambassador Hotel on the day Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated. Bradley E. Ayers and other people who knew them, identified CIA agents David Sanchez Morales, Gordon Campbell and George Joannides as being three men in the hotel that day. An article about this story appeared in The Guardian and on BBC Newsnight on 20th November, 2006.
themeaningoflife38 2 months ago
RFK would have opened a real investigation of JFK's murder if he had been elected.Someone wasnt about to allow that.The murder of RFK cleared the way for Nixon who was the puppet of Prescott Bush.
themeaningoflife38 2 months ago
behind the right ear and in the body. robbert grabbed his tie prolly to try to defend himself from his murderer
DewkChronic 9 months ago
behind the right ear and in the body
DewkChronic 9 months ago
security guard behind rfk pulled his gun out and also started shooting, i wonder if he shot RFK by accident or on purpose, remember sirhans gun capacity was 8 bullets, about 13 shots were heard
skaterride2 10 months ago
In this video, you can see how Sirhan actually got behind Kennedy. The man being interviewed is facing the camera, then at 4:29 he turns.Supposedly that is exactly what Kennedy did just before the shots where fired. When questioned as to why he did'nt shoot RFK between the eyes, Sirhan responded" At the last second the SOB turned his head". Kennedy then leaned backbackwards to protect himself, explaining the angle of the shots. Still; how was it that Sirhan happened to be in the kitchen??
6400az 10 months ago
@6400az
Sirhan never got behind Kennedy according to the witnesses present during the shooting. And the quote you attribute to Sirhan never took place. Writer Dan Moldea claimed Sirhan said that (supposedly delivered to him thirdhand, from Robert Kaiser who got it from Mike McCowan). Sirhan & his brother Adel who was present during McCowan's interviews with Sirhan deny that Sirhan ever said that. "I flatly deny making the statement Moldea ascribes to me in his book" More: tinyurlDOTcom/5v967m
StevenM818 10 months ago 2
@StevenM818 Your right, I've always understood Sirhan never got behind RFK. What I meant was; that is how it APPEARED ( @ 4:29)...... Sirhan got behind RFK. My mistake in the wording. Kennedy's movements made it seem like he got shot from behind even though the bullets where fired from the front. If Sirhans comments are not true " At the last moment the SOB turned". Then only God knows what happened that night. I'm arguiing from the point of view as to how it was Sirhan. Thank you.
6400az 10 months ago
@6400az
You're very welcome. That quote pops up from time to time but hasn't been proven (by a signed affidavit from a witness who heard Sirhan say it, which Moldea apparently said he can provide, but hasn't last I checked), or a recording of Sirhan making the claim. What I do know is Sirhan says he never made the claim, & witnesses have confirmed that. @ 4:29 that's Karl Uecker talking. Either way, the coroner said the gun was about an inch away from RFKs head. Sirhan's gun was several feet.
StevenM818 10 months ago
@StevenM818
Yeah the powder burns are a definite point of conflict. The thing I just can't understand is; if the powder burns are present, then someone put gun barrel behind RFK's head. Sirhan was'nt that someone as he never go that close. Should'nt THAT be the focal point of the investigation....now you know there was a second gunman.
6400az 10 months ago
This guy Cesar sold the revolver in question long after the assassination and investigation. Why hang on to the murder weapon that long?
I realize that there are facets of this murder that are not clear cut, but, as with the JFK assassination, if you look at the facts and actually do some research into this, you'll find that the named killer (in this case Sirhan) did it, and that there likely was no conspiracy.
sudaev 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The autopsy report showed that the bullets that killed RFK came from BEHIND him from a low angle & shot upward. Sirhan was facing RFK, who also had gunpowder burns behind his ear, indicating the shot was fired from a short distance behind him. Furthermore, subsequent investigation proved there were 13 shots fired; Sirhan's pistol had an 8-shot limit, plus it was incapable of the rapidity of the shots fired. There's overwhelming evidence that Sirhan's bullets were not the ones that killed RFK.
noonav 1 year ago
Did you hear that the real killer may of worked with the CIA? When I did, I thought to myself, 'Could it have been E. Howard Hunt?' Considering that not only was behind Watergate, but he was in Dallas when Robert Kennedy's brother was killed. And it doesn't stop there: I believe that Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the at-the-time California governor Ronald Reagan (three Presidents in other words) were in the plot to kill Robert Kennedy so that he wouldn't get to the White House.
EricandDish 1 year ago
Cesar was a guy who deserved a much closer look, to put it mildly. Naturally, no one ever did. He's the exact type of guy who would have been shooting at JFK in Dallas.
mcmchugh99 1 year ago 2
da fuck you mean complicated?2+2 is 4 bitch
2uentindward 1 year ago
Bush killed JFK.
See the video
Youtube: paul8kangas
paul8kangas 1 year ago
Divine intervention means God too has sent and will send those responsible for this cold blooded murder of a man of many children whom was ALSO the father of many children, straight to the fiery depths of hell for all time.....period.
Thejbirdy 2 years ago
Wow. For the JFK assassination, a policeman accidentally left his motorcycle radio on and recorded four gunshots, whose locations were analyzed and coincidentally, three came from the book depository, and one from the grassy knoll. It really is NOT difficult to trace the source of rifle shots. Now, some guy, again, accidentally, left his tape recorder on and recorded RFK's assassination, and what did the evidence turn up? Yup. Personally, I'm thinking divine intervention. ;)
grumpytosnowwhite 3 years ago
Check out all the other YouTube videos also dealing with the subject of Stanislaw Pruszynski's audio recording of the RFK assassination.
All these other videos can be found by entering three key search words into the YouTube search window. These three search words are: Pruszynski Van Praag
PruszynskiRecording 3 years ago