Added: 5 years ago
From: Queenisgod
Views: 1,130,049
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (177)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That sucked I hated it well I liked it but not enough torture u need more torture

  • THAT WAS TORTURE ? I WOULD HAVE CUT HER NUTS OFF !

  • its a trailer of a BDSM movie ? :)

  • 12-13 dildo!!

  • Germany systematically uses torture and murder to silence any opposition. Some of the murders known to the public: Uwe Barschel, Jürgen Möllemann, Heiner Gehring, Martina Pflock, Tron, Karl Koch, Bernd Seiffert, Kirsten Heisig, Fritz Bauer.

    My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage.

    German snitchers are following me on youtube and immediately flag my postings

  • Damn Gipsy girl

  • I heard Dildo

  • Damn, they should torture her more.

  • @gurujee666999 No Esmeralda was not bad...

  • elle me donne la chair de poule

  • wow, she was a tough nut to crack...

  • lol the guy singing looks like darth sidous XD

  • C'est deguelase ce qu'il fait tout ca parce que il en est tomber amoureux !!!

  • " Si elle endure, c'est qu'elle est dure d'opinion."

    En fait, avec lui, elle est forcément coupable, elle ne peut pas être innocente et ne pas faire de faux témoignage...

  • Well, as terrible as this is. I'll admit to being relieved. So far the play isn't nearly as dark of graphically violent as the original.

    By the way,

    @AuburnSnow I wouldn't say that Frollo sits well with me in the book. Maybe he does care in a twisted way, but he allows her to be tortured & goes out of his way to have her killed. He really is a monster from this point on. I suppose the play leaves out the psychology that makes this part interesting.

  • @Amy3422 Oddly enough, I disagree. I sympathized greatly with Frollo throughout the entire book. Aside from Paquette, I think his part in the story was the most devastatingly tragic. He is introduced as a serious priest who thirsts for knowledge, but has an almost warm and nurturing aspect to his personality too. His desire for Esmeralda is what completely uproots his good nature. I do believe that aside from the obvious passionate lust, Frollo did feel actual love for Esmeralda in his own way.

  • @AuburnSnow Haha. I also sympathized with him initially, but I put that down to Hugo's portrayal of the character, which shows so many different sides of him. Really, at the beginning, he's pretty admirable! Still, I'm not sure what his definition of 'love' is, because it seems incredibly twisted. He's a good character. Even so, the fact that he's tragic doesn't mean he isn't a sadist and a murderer.

  • @Amy3422 Too true, Hugo spent a lot of time with character detail! I got the impression that Frollo felt actual love for Esmeralda because some of what he does and says regarding her go way beyond lust or jealousy in my mind; I'm tempted to write an in-depth analysis of his character to better explain my stance. I think that his moments of sadism weren't performed out of ill will, but as a by-product of him not understanding how to cope with feeling desire for a woman, which led to his madness.

  • @AuburnSnow Now, I'm curious. What do you think makes his 'love' genuine? My own view is that he felt a combination of extreme attraction and fascination, superstition and xenophobia. It isn't surprising that he his feelings became so confused, after his cold upbringing. Some of what he says is certainly very moving, but can sadism ever come out of a good will?

  • @Amy3422 I think that he feels all of that which you just described and also love, but the love is choked by all of the other negative aspects of the combination, which allowed for him to torment Esmeralda as long as it wasn't by his own hand. It's hard to explain the parts that I felt were him speaking/acting out of love within the constraints of a youtube comment, though. This is why I feel like I need to write an essay about this, lol.

  • I love the way Daniel Lavoie sings this song, but this scene doesn't sit well with me. In the book, Frollo had no idea that Esmeralda would be tortured, and he was agonized when they put her foot in the vice- so much so that he stabbed himself amidst the torment of seeing Esmeralda in pain. And yet here in this play, he not only calmly watches Esmeralda being tortured, he's the one who is ORDERING it to be done. I wish it was different, because in the book, it showed that Frollo really did care.

  • @Jaysonaar haha ikr

  • tutti frutti

  • She's hot.

  • The old priest looks retarded

  • je pense qu'il a oublié les paroles à 0.29 ,mais il reste le meilleur

  • @sninapausini Non, il n'a rien oublié le spectacle est ainsi...

  • ok Daniel Lavoie has the most beautiful ,sexy voice ever and at the end (from around minute 1:00 and especially the last thing he says around 1:06 to the end) he sounds even sexier . Thank God he became a musician . I also think he was a great Frollo,full of clear yet also pent up,repressed emotion,his features are very expressive

    Haha Esmeralda's best parts in this musical are when she's in a scene with Frollo and in one of Quasimodo's songs otherwise her character is pretty boring on stage.

  • @wwwtotalitaerde Nobody really cares. This is a Notre-Dame de Paris video commenting space, not a confession board.

  • molto bello grazie

  • most torturous torture ever.

  • Why is it that she is taken barefoot to the Place de Greve? Why barefoot?

  • @SirLaertes I think it was meant to be humiliating.

  • @PlusSizeAngel what would be humiliating about it? thanls for your response.

  • @SirLaertes Remember, she is being led there to die. She has a noose around her neck and will be dressed in ragged clothing. Being barefoot just adds to the emotion of her death, it makes her seem more in the moment

  • @SirLaertes No problem! Well, thinking that she is gypsy and probably walked barefoot before, it´s nothing, but I think the whole "only chemise and not even shoes" thing was meant to be humiliating.

  • you could tell this is as show they have the microphones on their mouthes

  • MAGNIFIQUE !! 

  • Ahahahahah oh my God!!!!! go and see the Italian version that was beautiful! search LA TORTURA NOTRE DAME DE PARIS..

  • Boy, that was an easy confession. Frodo's job is pretty easy. I like it when he sings Hellfire better.

  • @TheFaustianMan :3 puuuurrrrr

  • @TheFaustianMan It wasn't really a confession. It was a false confession under pain of torture. In the original story, they were crushing her foot in a device called "the Iron Boot". Sometimes if the victim didn't confess they would crush the foot till it was nothing but shattered bone, rendering the foot permanately useless.

  • @EmilyGreene1984 Hi, thanks for the info. I guess that's what made the "confession" so easy. Kinda of like how water-boarding works today. Thanks for clearing that up.

  • @TheFaustianMan Well not exactly - given the fact we know Esmeralda was truly innocent. As for the waterboarding, sometimes it IS effective from rendering a true confession from someone, who otherwise refuses to confess to a crime.

  • @EmilyGreene1984

    assuming anyone is innocent.

  • @EmilyGreene1984 You're fully right. Well, besides the fact that if she's going to die anyway, she won't need very much her foot XD (I'm kidding, torture is obviously horrible)

  • @TheFaustianMan The Disney version and this one as well both have their merits. Hellfire is, in my opinion, the best Disney song ever, but the Disney version doesn't convey just how tough Clopin and the gypsies are and it makes Frollo a one-dimensional character. Of course, it is for kids, so the watering down may be somewhat debatable, but I still felt that Clopin's character was not done justice in the Disney version.

  • @Ryoukawaii Very true. I agree with you.

  • @Ryoukawaii hellfire is possibly the best song ive heard for a disney villain

    it wasnt the best movie for kids, but they might've been counting on kids being too young to understand the concept of the dialogue

  • that was fucked up o_o

  • Son crime est d'aimer Phoebus ?

  • @ChampSpinoza oui

  • FUCK!!! Sa fait un sacrée bout de temps!!!!!! O.O Faudrait que je m'y remette vite!! xDD

  • C'est vraiment superbe que cette comédie musicale soit autant appréciée (et pas uniquement qu'en France) =)

  • Confession after one turn of the vice?

  • Questi attori hanno una bella voce ma non sanno cosa significa recitare..lei dovrebbe simulare almeno un pò di dolore!

  • verissimo, nella versione italiana fa venire la pelle d'oca :)

  • Also, many leaders in the Catholic Church as well as the government, were corrupt at that time. Therefore Frollo could stand as a symbol of that corruption, to help the reader (or listener) understand in a more personal way, the terrors and depravity of that period.

  • It's a story from the 19th century!

  • Notre Dame de Paris takes place during the late 15th century....if that is what story you're talking about...

  • It is a story set in the early 16th century, I think, though it could be the 15th. But the point is: it is a story invented in the 19th century. Not factual reality.

  • It takes place in 1482, the end of the 15th century. The story, of course, was written in the 1800's, but Hugo, an adamant lover of history, wrote the story quite eloquently to demonstrate the issues of the times--even to parody them. Obviously, it is not a factual reality--the historical background of the story however is very accurate.

  • @Indulgeindark394

    Unfourtunatley that's true. Hugo goes into a very detalied depth of Paris at the time. From the buildings to the very cracks of the walls and streets of Paris. Some of it was really boring and unnecessary, but it turned out helpful throughout the book (:

  • At that time, only ? O_O ? This still happens today !

  • Sure there's definitely random priests going around condemning people to death... yes, all the time...

  • Il a la meme voix que Michel Sardou ! choquant ! Mais just pour ca j'aime beaucoup

  • BUT at the same time, she denies quasimodo who truely loves her, &nearly givesherself to that two-faced womanizer, pheobus. Frollo we also can show sympathy for, because at the beginning he was a wholely good man. He loved his brother & Quasimodo and stayed far fromwomen. Even as he turns to evil we still sypathize w/ him bcause we see hispain, his troubles,stuggles & pity his lack of love. Its ultimately his obsession w/ fate that is his downfall. Hedenies his own free will & allows his demise

  • None of the characters in that story were purely evil. Hugo gives us a reason to sypathize for each one, evil the ones with the harshest of deeds. And, I personally never hated any of them. At the same time, however, none of them are puely innocent or genuinely 'good' either. Just as real humans, they all have their faults. For ex.- we feel bad for Esmeralda because she is chased by a diabolical priest, cheated on by her supposed 'true love' whom sh'd do anything for, and dies for no good reason

  • Comment removed

  • As well as to that, being a Roman Catholic priest doesn't make him holy. In fact, in many cultures nowadays (even Victor Hugo noted) there is corruption rampant in that religion and numerous priests, of their own choice, sin.

  • Bottom line, Claude Frollo chose to try to kill Phoebus - Esmeralda didn't ask nor tempt him to do that. Claude Frollo chose to have Esmeralda arrested on the lie that she practiced witchcraft (when she clearly did not) and personally oversaw her having her feet crushed; he chose to almost rape her (when all she was doing was resting), and ultimately, he chose to have her killed, when she refused him. If she was a daughter of Hell, she would have done all that he asked or did - but she didn't.

  • In the book, he didn't order her torture; as a matter of fact, every time she screamed, he stabbed himself for the agony he felt that she was being hurt by his hand.

  • By not confessing to his own crime, he did effectively have her blamed for the crime.

  • and the fact that frollo framed her so he could be like be with me and you live or else you die

  • esmeralda!!! OPEN UP ur eyes!!!! why do u need phoebus when u r surrounded by men like frollo and gringoire?!!!!!

    silly,silly girl...

  • you forgot that Quasimodo also am loving esmeralda, but she loves only Phoebus...

  • i didn't forget that, i'm just trying to say that if i were esmeralda i would choose frollo or gringoire.

    phoebus is a loser!! quasimodo, i don't think that Esme could fell in love with him... she could only treat him as a friend.. a very close friend..

    but it's just my personal opinion..

  • Uh, MEbabyface? What would your reaction be if a random, old priest nearly raped you, constantly harassed you, followed you around and forced you to hide away in a cathedral to avoid being hanged if you chose not to comply with his wishes? I don't many would fall in love with that behavior very easily.

    I agree with you regarding Gringoire, though. Ya gotta love the guy. XD

  • uh

    Except Frollo tried to rape her twice? What?

  • twice?

  • From what I remember.

    I haven't re-read the book in a little while, but I believe it was twice in the book...

  • I thought it was only once, when she was in the cathedral and then she blew the whistle for Quasimodo...but I could be wrong.

  • Comment removed

  • i agree with u that she was not very smart(even aristocratic women could hardly read that days), but i can't say she was a daughter of hell.. why'd u think so? i think she was the purest girl in the book. if we compare Esme and Fleur then Fleur-de-lys is a fake doll to me..

    PS i think the only man who deserved death in the novel was phoebus.

  • Perhaps your right...Maybe she isnt so bad as Fleur.

    And I DEFINETLY agree that Pheobus is the one that deserves death. He is the one who caused this trouble!

  • She was not a daughter of Hell and she didn't deserve to die. She was shallow and stupid, but she was not heartless and evil like Claude Frollo, who truly was a servant of Hell. His death at the end of the novel was bringing him to justice.

  • Claude Frollo attempted murder on Phoebus and let Esmeralda take the fall for his actions, just as Phoebus did. Not only that, but he lied to the courts saying that she was guilty and had committed sorcery, when she had done no such thing. She was essentially an innocent woman wrongly accused of murder.

  • Um...Frollo was not evil...

  • He tried to kill Phoebus, he denied Esmeralda's innocence, he tortured her, threatened to rape her.. that's not the sign of a good or tortured man. He even laughed as she hung. Quasimodo gave him exactly what he deserved.

  • That is because Esmeralda's sexuality ruined him. Turned him from a normal priest, into a cruel monster.

  • That's a ridiculious reason. Esmeralda could not help the fact she was kidnapped and raised to think and behave like a gypsy - in fact, she was relieved when she found her birth mother Gudule. The way she was dressed had nothing to do with Frollo's actions and he could have easily practiced better judgement like everyone else, but instead, he chose to give into his passions and went overboard and not only that - but delving into alchemy amoung other things messed him up in the mind further.

  • Well Frollo was not evil at the begining! He could have remind fine if Esmeralda did not come to Paris!

  • @longman718 - He becomes evil though through his fanatical repression, trying to pretend that he is justified in doing all those horrible things.

  • I agree that she did not deserve her punishment; she was as you said, shallow & perhaps a bit stupid though. -shortsighted maybe, blinded by love. But at the same time, frollo was in a similar situation. blinded by his passions. and he hindered himself from salvation bcause he felt that it was his fate and he could do nothing.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Was it gringoire? :S

  • she's hot don't kill her,give her to me.

  • I'll take him,he'll forget her and then you can take her with no problems.

    Deal?:)

  • Its because she was a gypsy - which in of itself is not her own fault. (SPOILER) Esmeralda was not born a gypsy, but she was raised with them and that, in of itself, marked her in many of the clergies eyes as "evil" and "corrupt". It also did not help her case that she was, essentially, caught about to make love to Phoebus at a whore house.

  • Alright, I just don't understand who stabbed Phoebus?

  • frollo in a jealous rage

  • mammamia helene nemmeno grida alla tortura

  • Is this how Cheney did it?

  • no,no. i'm not being offensive,but she did admit to being one. just kinda carrying on CarnisianLady's comment.

  • 0:13 dildo

  • Oh wow, she is arrested for prositution. I'm trying not to laugh. But, I love all the characters and this play!

  • Why does the fact of Esme being accused of prostitution make you laugh? Not sarcastic, I just can't get why.

  • "Do you confess?"

    "I am a stupid slut... I confess".

    Um, is it so clear I can't stand Esmeralda?

  • She doesn't seem tortured, as I've said yet, but I love the wasy she says "Je l'aime! Je l'avoue!!!" it's great.

  • omg @ lyrics.

    this shouldnt be funny, but it really is.

  • Nella versione italiana Esmeralda urla, la si sente chiaramente mentre Frollo dice "Stringete..."... Lola è molto + espressiva, fa vedere e sentire la sofferenza... Helene che sta facendo? Un massaggio rassodante al piede? Ma x favore! W l'Italia, e w Riccardo, non "Richard" Cocciante!

  • Sì, ma attenzione a non essere ottusi come i cugini d'oltralpe che non ci ascoltano proprio.. La Sedara ha una voce pazzesca. Diciamo che lei e la ponce si compensano su diversi piani.

  • I don't feel sorry for Esmeralda while I watch this version, because she just doesn't seem tortured... she seems everything but not tortured. maybe just a weird dame.

  • This whole stage version was done from an abstract point of view, obviously they could not replicate the entire scenes of the story. It would be too costly.

  • Also, if they had used a replica of the actual Iron boot - the audience couldn't see her.

  • I don't think 61monica was referring to the actual stage tool. I think she (Monica?) was referring to the fact that Esmeralda's expression did not look tortured. With a lack of equipment, the job of an actor/actress is to portray the reaction to the object as if it were there. Unfortunately, she did not look tortured at all. She looked like she stubbed her toe.

  • Well the problem with a show like this - you don't want to overact - like the Italian Esmeralda did. This show isn't really a musical as such, its more like a rock opera/concert.

  • Yeah canneddice, I meant exactly that she didn't seem tortured because of her expression. Because they had the tools and the music to create the right atmosphere of the torture, but (God knows why) she didn't make a terrified face. I mean, Helene is a woman, but her character is a lil' girl who makes her very first meeting with pain.

  • Were they torturing her? she seemed a noble dame during a cure in beauty farm... better the italian version, for sure.

  • squallidissimo :S

    completamente inespressivi tutti e due !

    quello italiano è un opera a dir poco senza paragoni ! stupenda e semplicemente inimitabile:D !

  • Sono abituata a vedere l'Esmeralda di Lola che soffre durante la tortura, non so se Hèléne volesse rappresentare un personaggio più coraggioso o con meno sensibilità al dolore... però proprio non riesco a farmela piacere. Peccato...

    Invece devo dire che in questa scena Daniel mi convince parecchio...

  • hai ragione....lui è mlt piu simile al libro...k quasi nn si fa vedere....mentre lei pare k sta in una beauty farm...nel libro lei urla cm una pazza...cm farebbe una di 16 anni appunto....lei nn mi cnvince x nnt..mah...

  • Décidemment, les performances de Daniel Lavoie dans le procès et la torture sont grandioses. On n'arrive pas du tout à reconnaître Daniel Lavoie avec cette voix sinistre et froide! Et cette façon de cacher son visage c'est génial aussi, très funèbre.

    Vraiment trop réussi!

  • It's incredibly how his voice,so tender and soft,can sound so sinister.Like voice from hell!La proces and La torture give me the creeps!

    Daniel=genius

  • I think that's part of the character of Frollo. He is meant to be seen (by the people of Paris) as a figure of integrity and good moral and compassion.

  • ma la stavano torturando??sembrava che si stesse facendo una pedicure.

  • oddioooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooooo.. raga ma dite vero? vi piace sta cosa?? è una negliaaaaaaa... la ponce è molto meglio.. qst sta ferma è come se fosse scontato di essere torturata.. w notre dame in italiano! sta helene non sa recitare!

  • Frollo lo vedo un pò congestionato...

    Oh l'Esmeralda francese non ha fatto una piega mentre la torturavano! Ha solo aspettato che Frollo finisse la sua parte!!

  • sei grande helene... complimenti a daniel... nn so il xk ma so solo che a me questa lola nn piace...

  • We live in igloos?!

  • helene sei unica... una volta mi piacevi... ora mi piaci tantissimo... sembra ke anke se ti torturano tu nn ti inkini alla volontà di frollo...

  • ahaha my god she cant act!!! look the italian version...lola is better than her

  • Weird

  • oups j'avais pas compris la question dans ce sens la dsl

  • ellxandra c un "brodequin" une machine qui va du pied jusqu'au genoux et qui broie la jambes. Je sais c'est pas glorieux mais c'est ce qui est marqué dans le livre de Victor Hugo. En espérant avoir répondu à ta question...

  • enfet je me moquais ...Je voulais dire, elle n'a pas vraiment l'air d'avoir mal

  • kel style de torture?

  • I don't like this version.. Helene Segara is very boring..

  • ma che è 'sta roba?! da come recita questa helene piuttosto che una tortura sembra che le stiano facendo la pedicure...!

  • nice babe

  • That was lame. Couldn't they have worked in at least a little yelp or two?

  • you sadist! Why would you

    want to here Esméralda "yellp"

    in pain i mean i know she is a genuine bitch in this musial and in the novel but

    it's horrible the fact that she get's tourtued in the first place no matter how minor a torture it is

  • Because as it now, it doesn't look like she was tortured at all. Yes, I know he says that they're going to torture her and the other guys move the boot into position, but then nothing happens. She looks aboout as distressed as someone who can't get the type of salad dressing she wanted.

    I realize that it's an opera, not a realistic re-enactment, but she doesn't even ask for mercy. It looks more like they just threaten her and she instantly gives in.

  • Well, a lot of people did that. Sometimes they confessed after just being shown the instruments of torture.

  • Did you read the book? That's pretty much what happened. The only thing they left out is how much it hurt Frollo to see them do that.

  • In the original novel, she at first does not confess but with the Iron boot (which was the device that they put her foot in), they slowly crushed her foot till she confessed out of agony. It was a form of torture used to get people to confess to crimes, regardless if they were innocent or not. Those that, miraculously, would hold out until the end would end up being unable to use their foot ever again - in some cases the foot would have been literally flattened.

  • And worse, sometimes, if they still didn't confess they would have tried another form of torture. :(

  • torture my ass

  • I would listen to Frollo sing me the dictionary.

  • I actually agree with you on this -

    Helene never really struck me as a true Esmeralda. Good, but not great.

  • frollo's voice is so dark and spooky in this!

  • what are they doing to her foot? I can't tell

  • They are crushing it in a vice until she confesses. Poor thing.

  • ouch. thanks.

  • they put her foot in an iron boot and tight it until she confesses.

  • But this scene in the book is a little diferent....When he heard her cries, he cry too and cuts himself...

  • frollo is unexpectedly alluring!

  • You people are all sick, sex depraved people. This was was a kind of torture back then, that crushed your foot. And still, all you think about are your fetishes. Good luck understanding anything else.

  • thats gotta fait mal! XD

  • Im srry, hes like 'i love you' and then 'put her foot in the vice!' sadistic mofo! lol

  • xD Your comment made me laugh. It's soo true though! Frollo probably has a few fetishes xD

  • xDD

    That had me going for awhile xD

    lol

  • Songs 6 and 7 of act two are sooooooo AWESOME!!! Weird, they did use the sexiest music for the most gruesome scenes. o_O

  • il est idiot ce pretre toz 3ale

  • ahha bondage heh

  • hahahahaha you rule

    and so does this. wow. ultraaaa sexy, yet i can't seem to say why... :o)