Just cause she likes fucking recording artist who puts her videos on blast does not make her a nigger lover. Thanks Young Dread for leaking that sexy video. I finally found it!
the phothos are property of Esteé Lauder to do with as they please. Any model that works for an employer signs a release. I had models sign releases for some videos I did back in the day, and this was for some really smalltime stuff. Her suit will most likely be dismissed.
@YoungBrave2006 ya but was she aware of their advertising intents. they may have a right over her image for that gig, but its going a bit far to age her like that...i DOUBT she was told the extent of what they planned. I doubt shed agree to an aand portraying her to appear so much older.
she has the right to sue. no model would sign on to this if they knew what they were up to. c'mon.what model poses to BE MADE older & agree? her contract likely mentions antiaging cream, not THIS
@killerkitty777 She doesn't have to agree. It's the company's intellectual property to do with as they please, they don't have to tell her what they are going to do with the image either. Who nows if they even had that in mind at the time and then decided later to use that test photo for this particular ad. The release gives them that right. Sure, she has the right to sue; but she's gonna lose.
@YoungBrave2006 if they distort her image in a way that risks her career and she was not aware, why shouldnt she be compensated? why not?, not only is it false advertising ('wow, look at these -fake!- results' .....
@killerkitty777 Because, although I haven't seen the ad, I'd be willing to bet you underneath the picture there is a caption that says "simulated results" or something to that effect, and because as I said before the pictures are intellectual property of the company. They can photoshop and distort them any way they choose, and the release the model signs gives them that right.
@YoungBrave2006 ah yes, now u mention it I recall seeing that in ads. i dont feed into mags so its been awhile. I know art, copyrightm marketing, modelling,-not so much lol. if they say results are simulated, they are pretty much scott-free...crappy for her :P
...alwsasys watch who u sell ur image to. my friend let a guy photograph him for a friggin PIZZA....his picture/AD is on every copy of the Metrio Ottawa paper and he doesnt get a red cent. idiot.
@Kooshkoff Oh I'm so glad we have you as the judge of what's work and what isn't. This is how she makes money, there are people out there who make far more money playing games all day (sports), and if they lost their way of making money, they would all be, and should be, really pissed.
Oh and what the fuck does this have to do with feminism you dumbshit? Is everything to do with women feminism you you? I'm guessing you've never gotten laid.
She's 35 and if she hasn't landed big contracts by THAT age, it is never gonna happen! Show me a 20 year old and I'm right there with you but most super models start in their teens, as early as 12 if they're already tall. Look at Bruce Jenner's daughter for case in point.
She should win under the circumstances that the picture was not copyrighted for commercial use then sold to them but 2 million? Get fucking real!
@Kooshkoff . She markets products, they ruin her career she is entitled to money. How is that feminist at all, if she makes millions and someone ruins her career she is therefore entitled to millions. It isn't right being photographed makes millions of dollars in the same way being an athlete does not deserve being paid millions.
I'll tell u what probably happened is that the model sign a release indicating the company could use the pics any way they wanted. She just thought they wouldn't use it this way! Too bad for her.
ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT! Anna's critical thinking skills are zero - as she has failed to recognize the fact that;
1) modelling never deserved more than minimum wage anyway- as its not a proper job
2) the model is paid by a company to use her image however they want - as they have done - they could publish photos of her with a cock and balls on her forehead if they wanted, after paying her an average person's annual wage for an hour's modelling "work".
@dookdawg214 I see your point- I was making a very introductory level argument- there are fine details of contract that that we dont have access to- nevertheless my point stands that she wants her cake (ie. massive overpayment- 10,ooo times the average wage) and to eat it too (total control over the use of the images)- she is being paid ridiculous amounts for use of her image- she cant have it both ways- if she wants control- she can release her own photos for free on facebook.
CHRISLAM: ONE WORLD RELIGION"ABOMINATION Of DESOLATION" Bible Prophecy!!VISION Of The ATTACK Of ISRAEL That Is Coming!Germany:E-COLI..Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011/Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Middle East and Israel conflict,WWIII?-Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
Well, if you sign a contract, where all taken material can be used for a company however they like, you have no right to copmlain if you signed a contract. But since we don't know any of the details to the story and have no idea who that woman i, who cares.
@Kooshkoff Modelling isn't hard. All you have to do is be pretty. That's why all pretty girls are models. Modelling can't be hard. Especially if someone with your intellectual prowess is too above it. I'm sure you are the only conscious thinker in a world full of sheep.
How many people have had their career ruined by the economy? You enter the job market at your own risk, especially if you live in an "at will" state, and in most cases don't have any control over the ebb and flow of the times. I could care less that she's a "supermodel"...BOO F***** HOO!....rather, it's another example of an entitled soul who wishes to be compensated for a potential career change. Try selling this story to most Americans and you'll how little they give a s*** about this woman!
I think they should be held accountable for falsely advertising their product, but screw this woman. She signed a contract to take the pics, pics that automatically become the property of the company and can be used as they wish, so she just has to deal.
I don't think anyone deserves 3 million dollars for having their photo manipulated. That's BS. But it's the world we live in, models get paid more than people who work a sweat sewing clothes, by just wearing it.
CHRIST Is COMING! The WAR Of GOG And MAGOG!VISION Of The ATTACK Of ISRAEL That Is Coming!Germany:E-COLI..Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011/Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Middle East and Israel conflict,WWIII?-Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
@Razorlust What they're saying is if the people shooting her picture lied about the purpose of that photo, then they should be held accountable. If Estee Lauder says the picture is for a "warm-up" or 'test" or whatever and then possible doctor that picture in order to sell their product and it actually impacts her career, then EL should definitely be held accountable.
@MinGophers Most of the time a model doesn't even know exactly what the shoot is for.
If your contract doesn't specify which shots can and can't be used, and for what, they are all fair game.
There's no way she's going to win a lawsuit, and she's stupid to even try. As much chance as me suing Anna because this story was a waste of my time.
Oh, and in future the model should never be permitted to be photoshopped or even given makeup ever again because it is misrepresenting who she really is.
She signed a contract saying they can use her photo's to sell their product. if she wanted to approve of the ad first, she should have had her lawyers amend the contract to include that. Of course, the company would never sign back, so she ends up with nothing, but thats besides the point.
Depends on the contract. She probably signed on to take pictures for them, and they put her in an unflattering(to her at least) ad, and she's over reacting.
I kinda see what ana's point is,, but if you sign a contract to a company and you give away your photo they can use it for whatever they want. I don't think she can win unless she said what they were allowed to do with the photo,She is getting older, maybe she is just shocked that ppl aren't using her to be sexy anymore
2million, are u kidding me? some engineers, scientists and researchers are working their ass off in helping/ improving the advancement of society and yet they only barely make 50k a year. Give me a fucking break.
Im a model myself, and shes just being a whiney bitch. She signed the contract allowing them to do whatever the hell they want with the shots.
And besides, no company is going to look at those photos and think thats her. All companies look at their fucking headshots, not ads! Companies know photos are photo shopped! They're not stupid lol
@yourjunk420 if you don't care, why did you click this video. Unless you're an idiot you had to know what the video is about because it's in the title...
@xxxglitterglamxxx You're absolutely correct. That was a utterance during my death throes of watching these types of vids. I really dig TYT when it comes to news. And, in my search to get another "fix", I take my chances on vids like this resulting in disappointment. But, it's been declining ever so steadily to oblivion. Tis the quest to find more to entertain me on my days off...
Im just gonna have to break it to you women as it seems you dont understand and keep throwing your money away, ITS SCIENTIFIC FACT THAT YOU CAN NOT ANTI-AGE OK ITS IMPOSSIBLE STOP WASTING YOUR MONEY.
@GJNCA You misunderstand me, If they photoshop the photos and call them before and after using the product they are lying about the results of the product to the consumer.
There product did not cause before to become after.
Silliest lawsuit ever. anyone whos ever modelled incl. caroline, knows it's crazy. when a model go for 'go sees', u bring a comp card and a portfolio wif Many Many of your ads or magazine pics, so the company can see how u look before it chooses which girl 2 hire. so One photo cant ruin your career.
Shes doing this cos at 35, ur modelling career is over already
Cenk would rule in favor of Estee Lauder claiming it's "company policy" to do what they want since they are a private company. Cenk would then go hat on to fire the models who combat anorexia with medicinal marijuana because it's company policy...not the use of marijuana, but that their anorexiic.
Hmmm, Ana thinking that making an average woman look a little different in a negative way is bad? How fucking shocking? Do it to a chick who isn't 99% hot, or a guy she wouldn't sleep with (VERY Small group), and Ana will defend the ad to her death.
No TYT is not right on this. I am a student studying economics. If I get hurt now and am unable to attain the employment as a CEO in the future. I can't demand ''potential'' future loses into the millions. If you didn't make it as a model when you were 35, you're not going to be a million dollar celebrity in the future. So stop your whining. Still if its a contract breach you should get reparations for that, but not under this false pretense of potential future model status. COME ON!
@595o base motive? destroy your career? There is no base motive besides cheap advertisement and her career is to show pics of herself. When have those not been fotoshopped? I can agree on the fact that they didn't take the foto they had agreed on is a contract breach, but to accuse them of trying to destroy her career or that it has destroyed her career is just plain silly. Perhaps if she was hit by a car or something and her face was smashed, yes, but are u shitting me? a crappy foto? 2 mille!?
@Joolazoo "the idea that the morality of having 2 million dollars has anything to do with economics is laughable" ...laughable AND ironic, especially considering YOU'RE the one who brought the concept of morality into this conversation, jackass. i didn't link "morality" with "economics", YOU did. but hey, you sure did get me good that time by introducing a completely unrelated topic just now... anyway, take a basic economics course when you get into high school. fucking seriously...
I completly disagree, she solded her face, its a bit late to start choosing what your pictures are going to be used for. Unless they advertise something illeglal(racist etc) then I dont get why she gets a say :s
If the contract states that all photos are property of the makeup company, then tough shit. Being a model is selling your image. You own yourself, sure... but you do not own the products derived from your image (unless contracts specify otherwise).
@spikesmth Well, you might own the products of derived from your image too as a personal right over your "personal image". This is also what gives you right to be protected against libel. But I am not sure how far it extends and if and to what extend you can sign it away.
modeled for a company that photoshoped me to look older also,but it wasnt for cream .wow shes gonna make a bundle.she could just take it as an acting gig..thats how I handled it.called commercial print.
If you do modelling for a company selling anti-aging cream, or any sort of product that claims aesthetic improvements, you should expect your image to be manipulated in an unflattering way for before pictures.
Doing it without informing her was pretty unethical, but she should have been prepared for this. It's part of the business.
@Sykotix1 If you are a test person for experimental new drug should you expect that the drug might harm you permanently and therefore you have no right to sue?
Certainly an interesting question. (BTW, there were were quite some real-world cases on my example)
Legally speaking, they both have a right to sue. But there's a very high chance of an anti-aging cream company making you look old in your before picture. Experimental drugs have usually been tested on animals before, and very rarely produce long-term harm.
The difference between the probabilities of these events are vast. That's the main difference here.
Although if we start using probabilities to determine moral rights, then where can we draw the line?
perhaps you have a point there, but they weren't discussing the implications of product marketing on women... they were just talking about a frivolous lawsuit; I still don't care. how is someone getting paid an extra 2mil when she already got paid for doing her job going to change the advertising industry?
who the hell decided to run this story? Please lawd mercy, don't cover models' careers anymore. Unless they shooped like a penis where her nose was, these lawsuits will never be interesting or relevant, especially to your audience.
personally, I hope she loses the lawsuit... but, I seriously don't care
Just so people know. This is actually reasonably important. If she wins then there might have to be some kind of truth in 'beauty' product advertising. As a guy I am a bit sick of having to try to undo some of the damage these adds cause to the women in my life.
Oh sheesh... Who the fuck came up with this story, and why are Ben and Ana on the models side? I think people in the modeling industry knows that this is just an advertisement and know that this model isn't really old.... For crying out loud, have some dignity about your stories... Plus All model photos are photo shopped to look different then they actually look... How can Ben and Ana not know this!?
What?!? That must mean that the product doesn't really work, if it's photoshopped. Sucks, because I really believed the ads in the magazines, specifically the anti-aging ones.
wow, ana and ben are real jackasses here. all models everywhere always understand that the photos of them can be used for just about anything, like stock or advertising or what the fuck ever. caroline forsling also knows that. the photo is estee lauder's intellectual property, period. if she doesn't like it then she should get her ugly ass out of modelling so ana and ben can discuss real news.
So she has nothing else to do than sue the company for money she really doesn't need? Really? It'snot going to ruin her career. Everyone who works in the modeling industry should know that no published photo has been spared major editing, so how exactly will this ruin her career? This is just another one of those frivolous lawsuits that is really only intended to make the rich person richer. I honestly didn't expect TYT to support this.
it could have been the photographers fault not the agency. If I was her I wouldn't have signed anything which I dont know if she did or didn't but I wouldn't sign anything for test shoots. - Photographer
I totally agree. She more likely than not signed off on the rights to use her image regardless of context. I suppose that she could argue that the use was damaging, but if she voluntarily allowed open-ended use of the picture, then she really has no case.
oh stfu 2 millions dollars isn't enough, i agree that she should be given complete compensation if her side of the story is true, and i would agree with anything between 2-4 million dollars, but honestly more than that, wtf is her talented looking hot?, and shes 35 so shes not THAT young anyway, besides with 2 million dollars shes set for the rest of her life
dam i want to fuck u like Young Dread did in that leaked sex webcam show!
Notafreakification 7 months ago
dam u deep throated that entire cock in that leaked porn video I found with you and Young Dread just now!
monroe6oneill 7 months ago
I saw you sucking the dick of Young Dread before you let him fuck you in that porn. To bad it cant be on youtube!
1000GramzRSN 7 months ago
HOTTT!!!!!
TheCrowsHome 7 months ago
how much did Young Dread pay you to be in that sex tape? Why did you take him to court?
MrFritzinderHitz 7 months ago
hot
MsTralalila 7 months ago
Just cause she likes fucking recording artist who puts her videos on blast does not make her a nigger lover. Thanks Young Dread for leaking that sexy video. I finally found it!
Pause4Porn6 7 months ago
u r beautiful!!
thoiduocroine 7 months ago
i want to have my kids with you
888thatguy 7 months ago
nigger lover! Everyone knows u fuck niggers after that triple X porn you released with Young Dread. You make me sick! Black dick nigger loving bitch!
JaconLandau3 7 months ago
are u single?!!!!!!
c0mboz 7 months ago
Dam. When r you going to make another sexy webcam video with that recording artist in Atlanta Young Dread?
BetaCodesFree4all 7 months ago
so hot
TheTrailerGuy11 7 months ago
Where can I find that sex tape with you and Young Dread? I search google and only found a sample video!
sanyosubs 7 months ago
can i get yo numba?
DeathOfLeapingJump 7 months ago
u good a dick rider! Saw you take that long ass black dick in that Young Dread sex webcam serious shit also!
NITROJAKE561 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i love u
tktprmoi 7 months ago
this guy is an idiot!
LilFaerl 8 months ago
Is ana's shirt see through? S:
tanekki 8 months ago
the phothos are property of Esteé Lauder to do with as they please. Any model that works for an employer signs a release. I had models sign releases for some videos I did back in the day, and this was for some really smalltime stuff. Her suit will most likely be dismissed.
YoungBrave2006 8 months ago
@YoungBrave2006 ya but was she aware of their advertising intents. they may have a right over her image for that gig, but its going a bit far to age her like that...i DOUBT she was told the extent of what they planned. I doubt shed agree to an aand portraying her to appear so much older.
she has the right to sue. no model would sign on to this if they knew what they were up to. c'mon.what model poses to BE MADE older & agree? her contract likely mentions antiaging cream, not THIS
killerkitty777 8 months ago
@killerkitty777 She doesn't have to agree. It's the company's intellectual property to do with as they please, they don't have to tell her what they are going to do with the image either. Who nows if they even had that in mind at the time and then decided later to use that test photo for this particular ad. The release gives them that right. Sure, she has the right to sue; but she's gonna lose.
YoungBrave2006 8 months ago
@YoungBrave2006 if they distort her image in a way that risks her career and she was not aware, why shouldnt she be compensated? why not?, not only is it false advertising ('wow, look at these -fake!- results' .....
killerkitty777 8 months ago
@killerkitty777 Because, although I haven't seen the ad, I'd be willing to bet you underneath the picture there is a caption that says "simulated results" or something to that effect, and because as I said before the pictures are intellectual property of the company. They can photoshop and distort them any way they choose, and the release the model signs gives them that right.
YoungBrave2006 8 months ago
@YoungBrave2006 ah yes, now u mention it I recall seeing that in ads. i dont feed into mags so its been awhile. I know art, copyrightm marketing, modelling,-not so much lol. if they say results are simulated, they are pretty much scott-free...crappy for her :P
...alwsasys watch who u sell ur image to. my friend let a guy photograph him for a friggin PIZZA....his picture/AD is on every copy of the Metrio Ottawa paper and he doesnt get a red cent. idiot.
killerkitty777 8 months ago
She must have signed on this, she lose, sorry. Next please.
soupjam 8 months ago 4
2 million dollars is enough to go to college and then get a real job.
ooMONKEYoo 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff And your testicles need to drop.
Erverino 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff Oh I'm so glad we have you as the judge of what's work and what isn't. This is how she makes money, there are people out there who make far more money playing games all day (sports), and if they lost their way of making money, they would all be, and should be, really pissed.
Oh and what the fuck does this have to do with feminism you dumbshit? Is everything to do with women feminism you you? I'm guessing you've never gotten laid.
Erverino 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff I'm completely agreeing with you. Modeling is easy and that's why everyone is doing it.
TopGunOriginal 8 months ago
holy shit, her jawline is ridiculous
Blindeyeseesfar 8 months ago
You're both way off base here.
She's 35 and if she hasn't landed big contracts by THAT age, it is never gonna happen! Show me a 20 year old and I'm right there with you but most super models start in their teens, as early as 12 if they're already tall. Look at Bruce Jenner's daughter for case in point.
She should win under the circumstances that the picture was not copyrighted for commercial use then sold to them but 2 million? Get fucking real!
JonDeth 8 months ago
they should get sued by the public for making women appear more beautiful than they are.
OmarThePug 8 months ago
I agree with Ana......time for Este Lauder to pay up.
daguzify 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff . She markets products, they ruin her career she is entitled to money. How is that feminist at all, if she makes millions and someone ruins her career she is therefore entitled to millions. It isn't right being photographed makes millions of dollars in the same way being an athlete does not deserve being paid millions.
CrackCityRocker1211 8 months ago
If they didn't notify her before-hand that they would use the shot for the ad then she might have a case.
CHAOSoriginal 8 months ago
Ana looks... greasy in this vid
penguinsoulja96 8 months ago
In the movie Se7en, one of John Doe's victims was a model.
*PRIDE*
MrPmj1979 8 months ago
I'll tell u what probably happened is that the model sign a release indicating the company could use the pics any way they wanted. She just thought they wouldn't use it this way! Too bad for her.
ViciousOneWon 8 months ago
Hmm, but Estee Lauder probably owns the photo, regardless of the original intent of the photograph
astrolabe1976 8 months ago
lifestyles of the rich and famous, who gives a pocket full of fucks? i sure don't - and my pockets are filled to the brim with lots of fucks.
aidenmccloskey 8 months ago
suing your employer could ruin your career
green0grass 8 months ago 14
Ana, look...
dookdawg214 8 months ago
ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT! Anna's critical thinking skills are zero - as she has failed to recognize the fact that;
1) modelling never deserved more than minimum wage anyway- as its not a proper job
2) the model is paid by a company to use her image however they want - as they have done - they could publish photos of her with a cock and balls on her forehead if they wanted, after paying her an average person's annual wage for an hour's modelling "work".
FUCK OFF WITH THIS ELITIST ENTITLEMENT MENTALITY!
BiggerThinking1 8 months ago
@BiggerThinking1
Your number two is wrong. That's not how it works. There are legal parameters to respect.
dookdawg214 8 months ago
@dookdawg214 I see your point- I was making a very introductory level argument- there are fine details of contract that that we dont have access to- nevertheless my point stands that she wants her cake (ie. massive overpayment- 10,ooo times the average wage) and to eat it too (total control over the use of the images)- she is being paid ridiculous amounts for use of her image- she cant have it both ways- if she wants control- she can release her own photos for free on facebook.
BiggerThinking1 8 months ago
lawsuit???!!! didn't she get paid for the ad? didn't she know what it was for? she deserves NOTHING!
MissNophi2U 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHRISLAM: ONE WORLD RELIGION"ABOMINATION Of DESOLATION" Bible Prophecy!!VISION Of The ATTACK Of ISRAEL That Is Coming!Germany:E-COLI..Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011/Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Middle East and Israel conflict,WWIII?-Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
TheENTERRAPTURE17 8 months ago
Well, if you sign a contract, where all taken material can be used for a company however they like, you have no right to copmlain if you signed a contract. But since we don't know any of the details to the story and have no idea who that woman i, who cares.
aandreya 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff YOU WANT SOCIALISM YOU EVIL MUSLIM COMMUNIST GAY HOBO
redryan20000 8 months ago
@redryan20000 lol at ur comment
trollingandhating 8 months ago
@Kooshkoff Modelling isn't hard. All you have to do is be pretty. That's why all pretty girls are models. Modelling can't be hard. Especially if someone with your intellectual prowess is too above it. I'm sure you are the only conscious thinker in a world full of sheep.
TopGunOriginal 8 months ago
It's slander, she probably has a contract where they can use her photo's, but they still shouldn't be able to make her look bad with them.
Nigomsa 8 months ago
fuck models ! get a real job
AndrewMacedonia 8 months ago
God forbid they show her for how flawed she is in real life.
Vr4z1el 8 months ago
How many people have had their career ruined by the economy? You enter the job market at your own risk, especially if you live in an "at will" state, and in most cases don't have any control over the ebb and flow of the times. I could care less that she's a "supermodel"...BOO F***** HOO!....rather, it's another example of an entitled soul who wishes to be compensated for a potential career change. Try selling this story to most Americans and you'll how little they give a s*** about this woman!
klewieblu 8 months ago
I think they should be held accountable for falsely advertising their product, but screw this woman. She signed a contract to take the pics, pics that automatically become the property of the company and can be used as they wish, so she just has to deal.
vardoegers 8 months ago
Does Ana ever get through a story without saying, "look"?
lowenbotten 8 months ago
@lowenbotten I've noticed that as well. I AM looking! ;)
strakha0 8 months ago
I don't think anyone deserves 3 million dollars for having their photo manipulated. That's BS. But it's the world we live in, models get paid more than people who work a sweat sewing clothes, by just wearing it.
Aurudin 8 months ago
AAWWW shit ANAS back .... here comes stories which ana GOGGLED from the internet
0ptimusbibIe 8 months ago
Wow how much money do they think she deserves 100 million? Idiots.
Maggie4213 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHRIST Is COMING! The WAR Of GOG And MAGOG!VISION Of The ATTACK Of ISRAEL That Is Coming!Germany:E-COLI..Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011/Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Middle East and Israel conflict,WWIII?-Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
TheENTERRAPTURE17 8 months ago
QQ moar
Pher0cious 8 months ago
Estee Lauder is for Jews.
latinluigi 8 months ago
what I've learned from this video is that, the people of youtube really hate models
rsty614 8 months ago
Who the fuck is Estee Lauder and why the fuck should I or anyone else care?
cpufightclub 8 months ago
If an actor plays a gay character they must be gay in real life, right??
This is retarded. She signed a contract to sell the shoot.
This is the definition of frivolous lawsuit, and a waste of time.
If you don't want advertisers to use your likeness, don't be a model.
Razorlust 8 months ago 2
@Razorlust What they're saying is if the people shooting her picture lied about the purpose of that photo, then they should be held accountable. If Estee Lauder says the picture is for a "warm-up" or 'test" or whatever and then possible doctor that picture in order to sell their product and it actually impacts her career, then EL should definitely be held accountable.
MinGophers 8 months ago
@MinGophers Most of the time a model doesn't even know exactly what the shoot is for.
If your contract doesn't specify which shots can and can't be used, and for what, they are all fair game.
There's no way she's going to win a lawsuit, and she's stupid to even try. As much chance as me suing Anna because this story was a waste of my time.
Oh, and in future the model should never be permitted to be photoshopped or even given makeup ever again because it is misrepresenting who she really is.
Razorlust 8 months ago
Everyone should mind their own business. What a model gets paid is between the model and the company paying her.
MinGophers 8 months ago
She signed a contract saying they can use her photo's to sell their product. if she wanted to approve of the ad first, she should have had her lawyers amend the contract to include that. Of course, the company would never sign back, so she ends up with nothing, but thats besides the point.
ShaTR2 8 months ago
Depends on the contract. She probably signed on to take pictures for them, and they put her in an unflattering(to her at least) ad, and she's over reacting.
pvtpain66k 8 months ago
she's well known? i never heard of her, and she's ugly anyway, dont give her the money
xLavenderBlossomx 8 months ago
2 million and she did not even have to expose her vaginas?
CognosSquare 8 months ago
2 million isn't enough for a super model who does nothing but poses for money? Fuck you Ana, just fuck you.
xTheDynastQueenx 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I kinda see what ana's point is,, but if you sign a contract to a company and you give away your photo they can use it for whatever they want. I don't think she can win unless she said what they were allowed to do with the photo,She is getting older, maybe she is just shocked that ppl aren't using her to be sexy anymore
jesskat 8 months ago
Breach of contract = Law suite I agree.
Photoshop job = 2 million dollars Fuckyou.
Comp3630 8 months ago
How about mentioning something about the legality of fraud on the part of Estee Lauder pretending their shitty cream does something about aging skin?
mweibleii 8 months ago
It's false advertising anyways.
Houshalter 8 months ago
This looks like an ad for the photoshop creme.
ssuuppeerrbbooyy 8 months ago
As long as you're a a woman, Ana is there to rescue you, even if you're a pampered model.
Huntingthespy 8 months ago 2
2million, are u kidding me? some engineers, scientists and researchers are working their ass off in helping/ improving the advancement of society and yet they only barely make 50k a year. Give me a fucking break.
NibbleHusky 8 months ago
nice and jiggly
toddlamp 8 months ago
Who should win depends on the words of the contract she signed.
However, she doesn't look bad in the Before or After. I doubt the ad hurt her career.
If the photographer said it was a "test shot," he may have intended it to be one, but later realized he could make us of it and had rights to it.
Even if he lied in saying it was a "test shot," a fair punishment is that she doesn't work with him, again. Not that she gets $2 million.
EricJaffa 8 months ago
She agreed to a job with estee lauder...im sure the use of her image this way was probably in the fine print!
plushtea 8 months ago
I don't consider Anna a journalist by any standards. All she does are these trashy, meaningless celebrity stories.
iLovePrincessDiana36 8 months ago 2
@iLovePrincessDiana36
A bit like Princess Diana in that respect.
versanil 8 months ago
@iLovePrincessDiana36 she works well with cenk and the others and isn't awkward or dumb on the show. so who cares. it works.
plxplxkthx 8 months ago
@iLovePrincessDiana36 Who?
gigirox18 8 months ago
anna's hour is more and more useless!
mrmostarr 8 months ago
Model needs to sue God for making her old...
audadvnc 8 months ago
you have to show real losses to have a case
ss11s 8 months ago
I've been to Sweden and ALL 35 year old women look 50.
skaredufngamen 8 months ago
i thumbed down.. this whole video was a waste of time.. next topic please!
IsyLomeli 8 months ago
dam TYT, you could have show us a hot pic of the model.. :::frown:::
AltairZielite 8 months ago
it happens all the time. What a stupid lawsuit
jeffxl12 8 months ago
typical cunt worrying about her looks,"my career is in trouble" my fucking ass.
OmieBearMegaHead001 8 months ago
She has absolutely no case.
Im a model myself, and shes just being a whiney bitch. She signed the contract allowing them to do whatever the hell they want with the shots.
And besides, no company is going to look at those photos and think thats her. All companies look at their fucking headshots, not ads! Companies know photos are photo shopped! They're not stupid lol
treysparker 8 months ago 2
I only clicked this because of the hot pic
xxSerpenttinexx 8 months ago
WHO...GIVES...A...FUCK!!!
yourjunk420 8 months ago 95
@yourjunk420 if you don't care, why did you click this video. Unless you're an idiot you had to know what the video is about because it's in the title...
xxxglitterglamxxx 8 months ago
@xxxglitterglamxxx You're absolutely correct. That was a utterance during my death throes of watching these types of vids. I really dig TYT when it comes to news. And, in my search to get another "fix", I take my chances on vids like this resulting in disappointment. But, it's been declining ever so steadily to oblivion. Tis the quest to find more to entertain me on my days off...
yourjunk420 8 months ago
females always complaining bout some dumb shit.
Tha214King 8 months ago
@GJNCA Interestingly enough you can't sign away certain personal rights, but I am not sure if right to control the "public image" is one of them.
595o 8 months ago
Is Gloria Allred her lawyer?
bobbytiger 8 months ago 2
Im just gonna have to break it to you women as it seems you dont understand and keep throwing your money away, ITS SCIENTIFIC FACT THAT YOU CAN NOT ANTI-AGE OK ITS IMPOSSIBLE STOP WASTING YOUR MONEY.
antifugazi 8 months ago
@GJNCA You misunderstand me, If they photoshop the photos and call them before and after using the product they are lying about the results of the product to the consumer.
There product did not cause before to become after.
rarrmonkey 8 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Silliest lawsuit ever. anyone whos ever modelled incl. caroline, knows it's crazy. when a model go for 'go sees', u bring a comp card and a portfolio wif Many Many of your ads or magazine pics, so the company can see how u look before it chooses which girl 2 hire. so One photo cant ruin your career.
Shes doing this cos at 35, ur modelling career is over already
killerchipmunkattack 8 months ago
Comment removed
killerchipmunkattack 8 months ago
@latinluigi get in line.
ksthebest 8 months ago
I want to fuck Anas tits hard!
latinluigi 8 months ago
Cenk would rule in favor of Estee Lauder claiming it's "company policy" to do what they want since they are a private company. Cenk would then go hat on to fire the models who combat anorexia with medicinal marijuana because it's company policy...not the use of marijuana, but that their anorexiic.
virginiachris80 8 months ago
I we just going to overlook the fraud angle she is uncovering?
rarrmonkey 8 months ago
Hmmm, Ana thinking that making an average woman look a little different in a negative way is bad? How fucking shocking? Do it to a chick who isn't 99% hot, or a guy she wouldn't sleep with (VERY Small group), and Ana will defend the ad to her death.
hevyAccel 8 months ago 3
Models get paid too fucking much to stand around looking pretty as it is.
weejockpoopongmcplop 8 months ago 58
@weejockpoopongmcplop especially when all there pictures are photo shopped anyways
cloudvszell 8 months ago
No TYT is not right on this. I am a student studying economics. If I get hurt now and am unable to attain the employment as a CEO in the future. I can't demand ''potential'' future loses into the millions. If you didn't make it as a model when you were 35, you're not going to be a million dollar celebrity in the future. So stop your whining. Still if its a contract breach you should get reparations for that, but not under this false pretense of potential future model status. COME ON!
BrutusAlbion 8 months ago
@BrutusAlbion If someone with a base motive hurts you knowingly that it will destroy your career then you surely can make demands on that.
595o 8 months ago
@595o base motive? destroy your career? There is no base motive besides cheap advertisement and her career is to show pics of herself. When have those not been fotoshopped? I can agree on the fact that they didn't take the foto they had agreed on is a contract breach, but to accuse them of trying to destroy her career or that it has destroyed her career is just plain silly. Perhaps if she was hit by a car or something and her face was smashed, yes, but are u shitting me? a crappy foto? 2 mille!?
BrutusAlbion 8 months ago
Let's see the contract...
TruthAndMoreTruth 8 months ago
1:42
doldolrdoo!
HawxKid 8 months ago
1:44
doldolrdoo!
HawxKid 8 months ago
@Joolazoo "the idea that the morality of having 2 million dollars has anything to do with economics is laughable" ...laughable AND ironic, especially considering YOU'RE the one who brought the concept of morality into this conversation, jackass. i didn't link "morality" with "economics", YOU did. but hey, you sure did get me good that time by introducing a completely unrelated topic just now... anyway, take a basic economics course when you get into high school. fucking seriously...
thirtyoneuniform 8 months ago
I completly disagree, she solded her face, its a bit late to start choosing what your pictures are going to be used for. Unless they advertise something illeglal(racist etc) then I dont get why she gets a say :s
LtKharn 8 months ago
Jiggling baby
timoback3000 8 months ago
If she's lyin', that's grounds for Estee Lauder to counter-sue for libel. If she's telling the truth, best of luck to her.
TheSecondEvolution 8 months ago
If the contract states that all photos are property of the makeup company, then tough shit. Being a model is selling your image. You own yourself, sure... but you do not own the products derived from your image (unless contracts specify otherwise).
And agreed... "White people problems."
spikesmth 8 months ago
@spikesmth Well, you might own the products of derived from your image too as a personal right over your "personal image". This is also what gives you right to be protected against libel. But I am not sure how far it extends and if and to what extend you can sign it away.
595o 8 months ago
35 is really old for modeling anyway. Her last shot is this lawsuit.
Georgiapeach770 8 months ago
another case of a corporation taking advantage of someone and getting away with it
dragonflychainsaw 8 months ago
Malin Ackerman is the thumbnail? So hot. Children's Hospital rules.
schmoab 8 months ago
modeled for a company that photoshoped me to look older also,but it wasnt for cream .wow shes gonna make a bundle.she could just take it as an acting gig..thats how I handled it.called commercial print.
Mariposakisses 8 months ago
Fuck Ana....I'd love to see Cenk on the Swimsuit Edition
fontastic55 8 months ago 6
If you do modelling for a company selling anti-aging cream, or any sort of product that claims aesthetic improvements, you should expect your image to be manipulated in an unflattering way for before pictures.
Doing it without informing her was pretty unethical, but she should have been prepared for this. It's part of the business.
Sykotix1 8 months ago
@Sykotix1 If you are a test person for experimental new drug should you expect that the drug might harm you permanently and therefore you have no right to sue?
Certainly an interesting question. (BTW, there were were quite some real-world cases on my example)
595o 8 months ago
@595o
Legally speaking, they both have a right to sue. But there's a very high chance of an anti-aging cream company making you look old in your before picture. Experimental drugs have usually been tested on animals before, and very rarely produce long-term harm.
The difference between the probabilities of these events are vast. That's the main difference here.
Although if we start using probabilities to determine moral rights, then where can we draw the line?
I think you're right on this one!
Sykotix1 8 months ago
ugh, i'm tired of defending tyt, stick to real news, this is frustrating, who really gives a fuck
CorrerPorVida 8 months ago
35. she's done
escobari 8 months ago
@nexius8
perhaps you have a point there, but they weren't discussing the implications of product marketing on women... they were just talking about a frivolous lawsuit; I still don't care. how is someone getting paid an extra 2mil when she already got paid for doing her job going to change the advertising industry?
jeois411 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who the hell decided to run this story? Please lawd mercy, don't cover models' careers anymore. Unless they shooped like a penis where her nose was, these lawsuits will never be interesting or relevant, especially to your audience.
personally, I hope she loses the lawsuit... but, I seriously don't care
jeois411 8 months ago
Just so people know. This is actually reasonably important. If she wins then there might have to be some kind of truth in 'beauty' product advertising. As a guy I am a bit sick of having to try to undo some of the damage these adds cause to the women in my life.
Nexius8 8 months ago 3
Oh sheesh... Who the fuck came up with this story, and why are Ben and Ana on the models side? I think people in the modeling industry knows that this is just an advertisement and know that this model isn't really old.... For crying out loud, have some dignity about your stories... Plus All model photos are photo shopped to look different then they actually look... How can Ben and Ana not know this!?
ChameleonLost88 8 months ago
If they have aged her then she does have a case because they are changing her face and portraying it as her!
28stads 8 months ago
Comment removed
jeois411 8 months ago
2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09 2:09
jinkerGM 8 months ago
What?!? That must mean that the product doesn't really work, if it's photoshopped. Sucks, because I really believed the ads in the magazines, specifically the anti-aging ones.
hattersuffa 8 months ago
@Joolazoo wow, you really need to take an economics class when you get to high school.
thirtyoneuniform 8 months ago
wow, ana and ben are real jackasses here. all models everywhere always understand that the photos of them can be used for just about anything, like stock or advertising or what the fuck ever. caroline forsling also knows that. the photo is estee lauder's intellectual property, period. if she doesn't like it then she should get her ugly ass out of modelling so ana and ben can discuss real news.
thirtyoneuniform 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i hope she loses.
thirtyoneuniform 8 months ago
35 years old? Her modeling career is uver. Are you fucking stupid? Don't bother answering.
GypsyMofakka 8 months ago
So she has nothing else to do than sue the company for money she really doesn't need? Really? It'snot going to ruin her career. Everyone who works in the modeling industry should know that no published photo has been spared major editing, so how exactly will this ruin her career? This is just another one of those frivolous lawsuits that is really only intended to make the rich person richer. I honestly didn't expect TYT to support this.
coda623 8 months ago
ana could use that cream....
gigobait 8 months ago
Is funny how anna molds to the host!
edtronic 8 months ago
blue steel merman black lung orange mocha frapuccino hansel so hot right now hansel read minds center for ants walk off
Pelonetillo 8 months ago
2 million dollars isn't enough?!?!?! You could live off of the interest of that if you put it in the bank.
xbreekate 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Seriously doubt this will ruin her career at 35.
cherrydog9 8 months ago
She's 35?? HOLY CRAP talk about OLD!! She's totally over the hill!
I like my women to be between 18-22. Anything older and its past their best before date.
JDubs878 8 months ago
When did they all become "super" models? If you don't know their names how super can they be. Kinda of like calling girls porn"stars" I guess.
doctender77 8 months ago
2:09 is the best part about this clip
darkknight302 8 months ago
who cares if shes ruined? she has millions of dollars, if she didn't make another penny starting today she'd be fine.
dunhilyn 8 months ago
it could have been the photographers fault not the agency. If I was her I wouldn't have signed anything which I dont know if she did or didn't but I wouldn't sign anything for test shoots. - Photographer
Snakekilla12 8 months ago
If they own the photo... and the rights to use it for ads.... shouldn't they be able to do whatever the heck they want with it?
Sounds like someone is looking for some "model retirement" money.
It only ruins your career if you look like crap in person.
oolong2 8 months ago
@oolong2
True that, good comment.
refuckulate420 8 months ago
@oolong2
I totally agree. She more likely than not signed off on the rights to use her image regardless of context. I suppose that she could argue that the use was damaging, but if she voluntarily allowed open-ended use of the picture, then she really has no case.
Villhelm478 8 months ago
Ana's tits are amazing
cssftw100 8 months ago
If this model is so "super" than a stupid single pic wont ruin her career
Gr4yW0rld 8 months ago
Have Ana's tits got bigger? oh yeah, Ben is a douche.
IauthenticI 8 months ago
oh stfu 2 millions dollars isn't enough, i agree that she should be given complete compensation if her side of the story is true, and i would agree with anything between 2-4 million dollars, but honestly more than that, wtf is her talented looking hot?, and shes 35 so shes not THAT young anyway, besides with 2 million dollars shes set for the rest of her life
kazekage321414 8 months ago
If she's well know and people know her name already then who cares?
I see actors playing older roles,and they don't complain about not getting work,because of that last movie where they looked older.
volumedealer1 8 months ago