Added: 2 years ago
From: YouManitoba
Views: 5,690
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • there are a bunch of idiots replying this video. Ice thickness MATTERS. Read some papers written by GOOD SCIENTISTS

  • Do the facts matter? Ice thickness? The cliff? Second graphic from the top at

    nicholas.duke.edu/thegreengrok­/arcticreportcard2010

    Enough said.

  • @econdemocracy ya who cares about the facts and evidence right? it's not like science is based on evidence, just a bunch of guys in white coats trying to trick you... jeez why don't people know this?!.....

  • The desperate attempts by the so called "climate sceptics" like sydneydoc and rice9300, to deny reality would be amusing if the consequences weren't so serious for current and future generations! The Arctic ice is declining very quickly at the moment, a fact which is put in perspective by Dr Barber.

  • @stespe06 so i should stop spreading icemelt up there then?

  • I am just wondering if any of the commenters below have any scientific training?

    FYI: Barber's results have actually already been published in peer reviewed literature. They have been accepted as correct by the scientific community because of multiple other observations of exactly the same thing.

  • Barber has been spewing this nonsense since his early days at U of Manitoba.

    Just another example of someone making a career on verbal spin.

    I wonder if he is realted to Grizzly Adams.

  • I am looking at a computer image of early September 2009 and it was broken up ice at that time.

    The computers were not incorrect. Also the computer shows the ice cap is elongated that year with the region north of Tukoyaktuk as being the narrowest amount of ice on the cap.

    I have to point out no scientist would every make a conclusion like he did.

  • @OxAO Your comment was hilarious! I love how folks like you commenting on a video of hw experts are wrong. If you know so much get in school earn a PhD & produce your own ideas for peer review & see what happens. Good Luck!!

  • @Viracocha711

    look at the satellite photos yourself you can see the ice was broken up or thin ice.north of Tukoyaktuk why was it such a shock for them if I can read it myself on the Satellite photos?

    This guy is another scammer looking for free trips to the poles

  • jup gutes vid, und an die kerle geht mal auf FrauenMeister . com damit ihr mir nicht immer das gleiche schreibt

  • GLOBAL GOVERNMENT TAXATION FRAUD

  • if all the nice melts and sea level rises big deal. everyone in the future can wear capri pants. problem solved.

  • It isn't a problem if the sea ice is melting it is a problem if the ice on greenland melts.

  • hmzguys i really feel lonely today anyone wanna chat

  • What is happening is ; the particulates coming from auto exhaust and coal burning coat the snow pack and absorb more sunlight. This causes faster melting.

  • David Barber is an AGW whore who takes money in exchange for junk science purporting to show evidence of global warming.

  • These scammers claim the Arctic will lose its "protective cover of ice for the first time in a million years" ... haven't they seen the photos of the US Skate surfacing at the North pole, mid winter with no ice, 1959 ?

  • This guy is a liar, he's getting paid $40 million canadian to "prove" the ice cap is melting. There are numerous studies that contradict his claims. This is his last ditch attempt to influence Copenhagen with his lies. Other extensive on the spot studies have shown the ice is between 2.5 (2 yr) to 4 meters (4 yrs old) thick. Secondly, his course was east to west in the South Beaufort Sea, at 75 deg latitude, far from the pole and along the periphery of the ice pack between Alaska and Siberia.

  • Sounds scientific ... not ... one ship trip. Where's the comparison with previous ice ?

    As soon as some turkey says "alarming", without any sort of rigorous study, warning bells ring.

  • Might I suggest that you change the category for this video.

    You might want to put it under Politics or Activism because it certainly isn't Education.

    Can you tell me how much 'rotten' ice there was in September 2007?

  • So, you found that some of the ice reported by satellite was "rotten". You provide no evidence that the amount of rotten ice is unusual compared to earlier years, or outside natural variability, yet you feel confident saying the ice is "continuing to disappear at a very alarming rate". Your study does not support this conclusion. You are being alarmist. "Scientists" have been getting away with this sort of thing for many years but it is time for that to end. NASA says ice loss was due to wind

  • So you want us to believe that this is the first year of rotten ice? Did you check out the rotten ice levels 10, 20 years ago? I suspect the only thing rotten is your scientific standards and morals.

  • Apparently ice amounts aren't allowed to fluctuate anymore &

    the climate isn't allowed to change either. What was the ice cover during the Medieval warm period?...or is that question too inconvenient?

  • dot com

  • yes genious you were there late year...after the summer? ahhh...how about you enviro whackos stop cruising around in there breaking up all the ice...hey look at it this way, your predicesors were all affraid of global cooling

  • my goodness. hey world leaders, how about we do something about climate change.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more