@econdemocracy ya who cares about the facts and evidence right? it's not like science is based on evidence, just a bunch of guys in white coats trying to trick you... jeez why don't people know this?!.....
The desperate attempts by the so called "climate sceptics" like sydneydoc and rice9300, to deny reality would be amusing if the consequences weren't so serious for current and future generations! The Arctic ice is declining very quickly at the moment, a fact which is put in perspective by Dr Barber.
I am just wondering if any of the commenters below have any scientific training?
FYI: Barber's results have actually already been published in peer reviewed literature. They have been accepted as correct by the scientific community because of multiple other observations of exactly the same thing.
I am looking at a computer image of early September 2009 and it was broken up ice at that time.
The computers were not incorrect. Also the computer shows the ice cap is elongated that year with the region north of Tukoyaktuk as being the narrowest amount of ice on the cap.
I have to point out no scientist would every make a conclusion like he did.
@OxAO Your comment was hilarious! I love how folks like you commenting on a video of hw experts are wrong. If you know so much get in school earn a PhD & produce your own ideas for peer review & see what happens. Good Luck!!
look at the satellite photos yourself you can see the ice was broken up or thin ice.north of Tukoyaktuk why was it such a shock for them if I can read it myself on the Satellite photos?
This guy is another scammer looking for free trips to the poles
What is happening is ; the particulates coming from auto exhaust and coal burning coat the snow pack and absorb more sunlight. This causes faster melting.
These scammers claim the Arctic will lose its "protective cover of ice for the first time in a million years" ... haven't they seen the photos of the US Skate surfacing at the North pole, mid winter with no ice, 1959 ?
This guy is a liar, he's getting paid $40 million canadian to "prove" the ice cap is melting. There are numerous studies that contradict his claims. This is his last ditch attempt to influence Copenhagen with his lies. Other extensive on the spot studies have shown the ice is between 2.5 (2 yr) to 4 meters (4 yrs old) thick. Secondly, his course was east to west in the South Beaufort Sea, at 75 deg latitude, far from the pole and along the periphery of the ice pack between Alaska and Siberia.
So, you found that some of the ice reported by satellite was "rotten". You provide no evidence that the amount of rotten ice is unusual compared to earlier years, or outside natural variability, yet you feel confident saying the ice is "continuing to disappear at a very alarming rate". Your study does not support this conclusion. You are being alarmist. "Scientists" have been getting away with this sort of thing for many years but it is time for that to end. NASA says ice loss was due to wind
So you want us to believe that this is the first year of rotten ice? Did you check out the rotten ice levels 10, 20 years ago? I suspect the only thing rotten is your scientific standards and morals.
yes genious you were there late year...after the summer? ahhh...how about you enviro whackos stop cruising around in there breaking up all the ice...hey look at it this way, your predicesors were all affraid of global cooling
there are a bunch of idiots replying this video. Ice thickness MATTERS. Read some papers written by GOOD SCIENTISTS
class1818 1 year ago
Do the facts matter? Ice thickness? The cliff? Second graphic from the top at
nicholas.duke.edu/thegreengrok/arcticreportcard2010
Enough said.
econdemocracy 1 year ago
@econdemocracy ya who cares about the facts and evidence right? it's not like science is based on evidence, just a bunch of guys in white coats trying to trick you... jeez why don't people know this?!.....
dontbeafoolok 4 months ago
The desperate attempts by the so called "climate sceptics" like sydneydoc and rice9300, to deny reality would be amusing if the consequences weren't so serious for current and future generations! The Arctic ice is declining very quickly at the moment, a fact which is put in perspective by Dr Barber.
stespe06 1 year ago
@stespe06 so i should stop spreading icemelt up there then?
dayradio65 9 months ago
I am just wondering if any of the commenters below have any scientific training?
FYI: Barber's results have actually already been published in peer reviewed literature. They have been accepted as correct by the scientific community because of multiple other observations of exactly the same thing.
danwhnt 1 year ago
Barber has been spewing this nonsense since his early days at U of Manitoba.
Just another example of someone making a career on verbal spin.
I wonder if he is realted to Grizzly Adams.
grandbank68 1 year ago
I am looking at a computer image of early September 2009 and it was broken up ice at that time.
The computers were not incorrect. Also the computer shows the ice cap is elongated that year with the region north of Tukoyaktuk as being the narrowest amount of ice on the cap.
I have to point out no scientist would every make a conclusion like he did.
OxAO 1 year ago
@OxAO Your comment was hilarious! I love how folks like you commenting on a video of hw experts are wrong. If you know so much get in school earn a PhD & produce your own ideas for peer review & see what happens. Good Luck!!
Viracocha711 1 day ago
@Viracocha711
look at the satellite photos yourself you can see the ice was broken up or thin ice.north of Tukoyaktuk why was it such a shock for them if I can read it myself on the Satellite photos?
This guy is another scammer looking for free trips to the poles
OxAO 2 minutes ago
jup gutes vid, und an die kerle geht mal auf FrauenMeister . com damit ihr mir nicht immer das gleiche schreibt
cornelljemisonuu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
t:
"It isn't a problem if the sea ice is melting it is a problem if the ice on greenland melts."
Not true... if the sea ice melts, far less of the suns warmth is reflected back to space.
All that extra energy goes into the Arctic Ocean and undoubtedly will change weather patterns for the entire Northern Hemisphere.
Try leaving the fridge door open and see how your food likes it. ;)
alberniweather 2 years ago
GLOBAL GOVERNMENT TAXATION FRAUD
legacy6684 2 years ago
if all the nice melts and sea level rises big deal. everyone in the future can wear capri pants. problem solved.
glennjridge 2 years ago
It isn't a problem if the sea ice is melting it is a problem if the ice on greenland melts.
turok4lyfe 2 years ago
hmzguys i really feel lonely today anyone wanna chat
Annieaksamia 2 years ago
What is happening is ; the particulates coming from auto exhaust and coal burning coat the snow pack and absorb more sunlight. This causes faster melting.
samdon815 2 years ago
David Barber is an AGW whore who takes money in exchange for junk science purporting to show evidence of global warming.
kentdreams 2 years ago
These scammers claim the Arctic will lose its "protective cover of ice for the first time in a million years" ... haven't they seen the photos of the US Skate surfacing at the North pole, mid winter with no ice, 1959 ?
sydneydoc 2 years ago
This guy is a liar, he's getting paid $40 million canadian to "prove" the ice cap is melting. There are numerous studies that contradict his claims. This is his last ditch attempt to influence Copenhagen with his lies. Other extensive on the spot studies have shown the ice is between 2.5 (2 yr) to 4 meters (4 yrs old) thick. Secondly, his course was east to west in the South Beaufort Sea, at 75 deg latitude, far from the pole and along the periphery of the ice pack between Alaska and Siberia.
mlorrey 2 years ago
Sounds scientific ... not ... one ship trip. Where's the comparison with previous ice ?
As soon as some turkey says "alarming", without any sort of rigorous study, warning bells ring.
sydneydoc 2 years ago
Might I suggest that you change the category for this video.
You might want to put it under Politics or Activism because it certainly isn't Education.
Can you tell me how much 'rotten' ice there was in September 2007?
Billiquiz 2 years ago
So, you found that some of the ice reported by satellite was "rotten". You provide no evidence that the amount of rotten ice is unusual compared to earlier years, or outside natural variability, yet you feel confident saying the ice is "continuing to disappear at a very alarming rate". Your study does not support this conclusion. You are being alarmist. "Scientists" have been getting away with this sort of thing for many years but it is time for that to end. NASA says ice loss was due to wind
rice9300 2 years ago 2
So you want us to believe that this is the first year of rotten ice? Did you check out the rotten ice levels 10, 20 years ago? I suspect the only thing rotten is your scientific standards and morals.
Cornfed812 2 years ago 2
Apparently ice amounts aren't allowed to fluctuate anymore &
the climate isn't allowed to change either. What was the ice cover during the Medieval warm period?...or is that question too inconvenient?
fatguy309 2 years ago
dot com
Megamediaplex 2 years ago
yes genious you were there late year...after the summer? ahhh...how about you enviro whackos stop cruising around in there breaking up all the ice...hey look at it this way, your predicesors were all affraid of global cooling
DonDahab 2 years ago
my goodness. hey world leaders, how about we do something about climate change.
normaniben 2 years ago