@rigel48. That's my view and just that, a simple view. O supposed everyone is endorsed to have one. I didn't know that yo be able to talk about musicality I needed your approval. And, in spite of your dogmatic view, I sustain my point: Argerich gives priority to velocity over musicality. Sincerely, a 15 year experience piano teacher
@martin201199 Velocity and musicality are not antinomic. Some can play fast, like Argerich, with as much expression than others with a slower tempo.
In this rhapsody Liszt begin with Tempo giusto (strict time). This does not prejudge for a fast or slow tempo. One can supposed that he asks for a rather brisk tempo as he indicates Poco rallent some bars later. Anyway I do not share your view concerning Argerich's interpretation, but I admit you have the rigth to express it.
Che is brilliant. But even in this kind of music musicality is of more importance than virtuosism. And Argerich sacrifices musicality at the beginning with mistakes as a toll for playing so carelessly. I prefer Cziffras version then Land Lang's and only then Argerich's.
@martin201199 I am not sure you are able to talk about "musicality". Surely Cziffra has this music in his blood, but LangLang rendition has more to do with circus than with music. It is not the little slip at 0:56 (mistake and not "mistakes") which robs Argerich's interpretation of its natural musical quality. Her virtuosity is always made up for musical expression.
How does she do it - the final movement without missing a beat or a wrong note ! A magnificnet pianist if ever there was one.The last 12 seconds were simply breathtaking.
yeah....that guy just said lang lang>argerich. I'm in disbelief. Yeah people are entitled to their opinion... but that is one of the few opinions that we can say is actually a WRONG opinion.
@poymanjoe I did not know that this rhapsody was supposed to be humourous. In this case you should have a look to Lang Lang version. It is utterly comical !
@rigel48 Well, basically a rhapsody often borrows its theme from folk music, so it can be very joyfull. François-René Duchâble seems to have a lot of fun playing it, especially in the last third. Maybe he doesn't play it this way every time. I wish I could be as relaxed as he is...
I like these 3 different interpretations of the rhapsody. Each one has a special spirit.
Nothing to say a bout Lang Lang ... that says a lot !
the fist CD i ever bought was Martha Argerich playing Rachmaninoff piano concerto no. 3 and Tchaikovsky piano concerto no.1 when I was 9 and I've loved her ever since! she's the one who inspired me to be a pianist myself and after 10 years I'm finally seeing her play live in two weeks time!
Musicianship should NOT be based on the amount of right notes one plays....Just listen to the music and stop focusing on minute "flaws". I hate when people do that. Until you can play that as well as her, don't talk.
@ngpiano72 You are perfectly right ! Liszt, Cortot, Horowitz, Richter, ..., did some wrong notes. Nevertheless, they remain as the greatest pianists ever.
I think it is a fairly good performance, she was still young and I believe still had to mature a bit more in order to play Liszt. Doesn't feel epic but still is a just but a drop of water in a gigantic career.
...she sounds like a young girl playing Liszt, which is not a natural thing, because for Liszt you need a pair of balls as the standard issue equipment on you at the outset...but, well, being Martha, not just anybody, she makes it...shows certain "school-conservatory" feel in this, i.e. sounds "touchingly naive", not machine-jaded like a lot of those people nowadays...
Amazing!!! Now, I have to say, my favorite version is Horowitz's on his Homage to Liszt album, acknowledging that, in the spirit of Liszt playfulness and improvisation, Horowitz took some liberties with the music-as-written. But this is an amazing fantastic version. I loved it. Thank you so much for posting this video, mmoynen!! Also, Martha was extremely lovely back in the mid 60's. Yowsa!
@TheDardanius Her bass isn't soft. It's just right. Cziffra, Lang Lang and the others thunder out the bass in this piece too much and muddle everything up.
@OriginalBasaliskos Please, never name that brat and the great hero Cziffra in one sentence again. I know you did not mean any harm, but still. Please.
She must have set an all-time world record with the speed at which she plays these octaves. She outdoes herself here compared to her performance of this rhapsody for Deutch Grammophon in 1966.
When i first heard the DG record of her HR6 it chonge my life....there was the incarnation of natural forces, animal magnetism and mysterious simplicity....everyone else sounded...pedestrian afterwards. To see this and experience again Martha's astonishing qualities, which she herself doesn't even understand, is marvellous. Whatever faults anyone likes to look for, this is unequalled anywhere; like an earthquake, there is no disputing the matter. A Force of Nature.Don't try to understand!
I did not say that Horowitz has slow octaves. I am not so stupid! I just said that in THIS rhapsody he takes the octaves quite slowly at the beginning in order to have a great speed contrast in the final presto.
Of course he has a formidable octave technique (Tchaikovsky 1st PC !) and I am a great fan of him.
Concerning the Rach3, his version with Barbirolli is probably the fastest of all. But Argerich's is my favourite and to say that she plays at most mezzo forte is ludicrous !
In 1966 Martha Argerich perfomed the best version of Hungarian Rhapsody No. 6 of all times, so since then I don't even bother looking for other version. It's perfect.
well, that's better :) but as soon as i get responds so quickly i wanna ask: what the hell u, so many people, r doing here? go listen 2 the great ones: Richter (i just wachted today his 119th opus, unbelievable), Rachmaninoff, Gilels. stop wasting yr time on empty, fingering players, also good, but without any intention, idea or imagination. those guys were immortal artists, who were burning themselves on stage, making history. what do yr favorites do? finger job, 'n not a good one, i must tell
@rigel48 If your ears can't hear her problems in the ending, please, play Horowitz again and compare HIS devastating power in both hands to her mosquito-like sound. And do me a favor do not tell anybody anymore that the King of octaves has slow octaves, that was really funny.
By the way, her Rachmaninoff 3rd is also fastest, but, at the same time, the softest, has been played at most on mezzo forte.
@pupulique Ha you only can't believe your ears. Horowitz is playing very well and Richter too, but Argerich has this unbelievable power and her interpretations are very modern, maybe to modern for your old fashioned ears? Listen to her Gaspard or her Ravel concierto, even her Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff are better then these of the big romanciers like Horowitz and Richter were. Maybe you have a problem with accepting a woman under the best pianists in the world.
To call Richter a romantic explains a lot to me. Beethoven, probably, is also an old fashioned for you. It doesn't surprise me that there are mostly arrogants posting on channels like this one. People who listen to the names I mentioned don't have problems. Because they know what is music about, and they understand what they hear. Martha is fine for our time, no doubt, but isn't an interpreter at all in a meaning to use for the greatest pianists of the century.
@pupulique What a pretentious man you are ! YOU know what is real greatness, and people who like Argerich are only tasteless ! Maybe you do not know that Horowitz, Rubinstein, Arrau, Kempff, Gilels, to name just 5 great names, praised highly Martha Argerich. I suppose that they knew what they were taking about !
@bdjmbl17 and it's CONCERTO, every child knows it. Before to recommend what I should listen, learn elementary music words, don't embarrass yourself, and Martha, who might have such backwoodsmen for her support. However, I'm not surprised that people like you can't realize a real greatness. It's not for you.
@pupulique Actually, that's just the Italian version of the word. Concierto is, in fact, the spanish version of the word. There are various related words: conserto, consent, concert, etc. from different languages which mean the same thing: In agreement. A simple internet search might lead you to the Britannica Academic Online encyclopedia, from which you may read an entire history of the origin of the term. Please take the time to educate yourself and avoid further embarassment. Good day
@bdjmbl17 Guitar? Oh, c'mon, you gotta be kidding. I wonder why it's not funny to you to tell me this instead of being so angry in your post? Why did you get me so busy with you then? I studied in very good places but I don't think you are aware of them. Sorry, but I'm really tired of you, can you leave me alone? I too much respect German music to discuss bullshit with you. I know about it more than you can even imagine. I wish you all the best with your guitar.
I sometimes think there is something very dynamic and... urm, modern sounding about Liszt. Like at 5:14 when the bass suddenly starts to grow and cut through the mix, speeding up and driving the piece onwards. He was like the master of the bass hook in romantic piano music. It's all a bit rock and roll really lol
What a liveliness in this rhapsody. Her playing is so natural as if she was improvising (in the gipsy style). Not to mention the beauty of her sound (as always).
And what about her octaves ! her acceleration at the end is fantastic. Alexei Grynyuk does not play faster ! And she is so musical ! This video is a treasure.
@mmoynan It is really odd... always one of a small handfull of people. And always a copy/paste comment spammed on every Argerich video. So, Lisztismylove (or whoever) when you do come back to this video (which I know you will, unless you have some sort of checkLiszt) and read this comment why not address your follow up to me directly. Tell me what goes on in your head, I would love to know...
truly one of my favorites by her, love ya martha, always will (even if you lose ur hands)
Centario13 3 days ago
I dislike this pianist.
chiidaramushini 1 week ago
@rigel48. That's my view and just that, a simple view. O supposed everyone is endorsed to have one. I didn't know that yo be able to talk about musicality I needed your approval. And, in spite of your dogmatic view, I sustain my point: Argerich gives priority to velocity over musicality. Sincerely, a 15 year experience piano teacher
martin201199 1 week ago
@martin201199 Velocity and musicality are not antinomic. Some can play fast, like Argerich, with as much expression than others with a slower tempo.
In this rhapsody Liszt begin with Tempo giusto (strict time). This does not prejudge for a fast or slow tempo. One can supposed that he asks for a rather brisk tempo as he indicates Poco rallent some bars later. Anyway I do not share your view concerning Argerich's interpretation, but I admit you have the rigth to express it.
rigel48 1 week ago
Che is brilliant. But even in this kind of music musicality is of more importance than virtuosism. And Argerich sacrifices musicality at the beginning with mistakes as a toll for playing so carelessly. I prefer Cziffras version then Land Lang's and only then Argerich's.
martin201199 1 week ago
@martin201199 I am not sure you are able to talk about "musicality". Surely Cziffra has this music in his blood, but LangLang rendition has more to do with circus than with music. It is not the little slip at 0:56 (mistake and not "mistakes") which robs Argerich's interpretation of its natural musical quality. Her virtuosity is always made up for musical expression.
rigel48 1 week ago
How does she do it - the final movement without missing a beat or a wrong note ! A magnificnet pianist if ever there was one.The last 12 seconds were simply breathtaking.
steinwaygrande1 1 week ago
I love matha's way to play piano, especially in Chopin, but for this one, i think i prefer Czyffra's version.
GidgiPianiste 1 week ago
I wish I was the piano
richml64 2 weeks ago 2
yeah....that guy just said lang lang>argerich. I'm in disbelief. Yeah people are entitled to their opinion... but that is one of the few opinions that we can say is actually a WRONG opinion.
randomprimate 3 weeks ago
I adore her passion, plain and simple.
montclef 3 weeks ago
More humourous (but sound recording is awful)
watch?v=QTMP9EnZVdQ
poymanjoe 3 weeks ago
@poymanjoe I did not know that this rhapsody was supposed to be humourous. In this case you should have a look to Lang Lang version. It is utterly comical !
rigel48 3 weeks ago
@rigel48 Well, basically a rhapsody often borrows its theme from folk music, so it can be very joyfull. François-René Duchâble seems to have a lot of fun playing it, especially in the last third. Maybe he doesn't play it this way every time. I wish I could be as relaxed as he is...
I like these 3 different interpretations of the rhapsody. Each one has a special spirit.
Nothing to say a bout Lang Lang ... that says a lot !
poymanjoe 3 weeks ago
More sensitive and intelligible
watch?v=Ep0tWVn3Yjw
poymanjoe 3 weeks ago
I would really like to know how liszt just could do this!!!! it's a hard piece but beautiful! i wish liszt was alive!:) LOL
marisolurrutia 1 month ago
I really would like to see franz liszt's technical abilities.
oterdverg 1 month ago
Her playing forced me to take an arrow to the knee
Laprevraven 1 month ago
the fist CD i ever bought was Martha Argerich playing Rachmaninoff piano concerto no. 3 and Tchaikovsky piano concerto no.1 when I was 9 and I've loved her ever since! she's the one who inspired me to be a pianist myself and after 10 years I'm finally seeing her play live in two weeks time!
Shanefee1770 1 month ago
extremely beautiful!!!!!!!!!!! no one must ever know that i commented this.
oterdverg 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought I could play this till 3:50. And then my eyes bugged out till pretty much the end.
Holy Helen of Troy I've never heard anyone SHRED octaves like that before. 0_o
Stolphos 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought I could play this till 3:50...and then my eyes bugged out till pretty much the end.
Holy Helen of Troy I've never seen anyone unleash octaves like that. o_0
Stolphos 1 month ago
Comment removed
Stolphos 1 month ago
Comment removed
Stolphos 1 month ago
I am totally speechless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
pianist1951 1 month ago
Yes, indeed, ladies 'n gentlemen.... she's 90 lbs. drippin' wet, but can she make that piano ROAR!
cowboytim98 1 month ago
fascinating
batchava 1 month ago
classical music ROCKS!!
fedelera95 1 month ago 5
its AMAZING THIS VIDEO AND AUDIO!! ITS PERFECTLY!! IN 1966!!!!
liberaTV 1 month ago
Musicianship should NOT be based on the amount of right notes one plays....Just listen to the music and stop focusing on minute "flaws". I hate when people do that. Until you can play that as well as her, don't talk.
ngpiano72 2 months ago
@ngpiano72 You are perfectly right ! Liszt, Cortot, Horowitz, Richter, ..., did some wrong notes. Nevertheless, they remain as the greatest pianists ever.
rigel48 2 months ago
She plays with a lot of gusto, I like her approach. But somehow that doesn't make up for her -- numerous -- mistakes.
ivelosthewilltolive 2 months ago
@ivelosthewilltolive Apart the slip at 0:56, where are the "numerous" mistakes ?
It is distressing to see how dishonest some people are with this artist !
rigel48 2 months ago
it is so fantastic to see how it seems easy with her ;:) I am enchanted ...and wish I could play like her !!!
lili031176 2 months ago
This is one of the "yardsticks" against which ALL renditions of this piece are measured. And rightly so.
cowboytim98 2 months ago
Das hat die Martha aber feiiin gemacht.
Und es hat überhaupt nicht wehgetan! Eiiiiiiiiiiii..........
The1976spirit 2 months ago
omg.....im gay and i think martha argerich just got me turned on with this video. just saying. she beasted it
slopedude3 2 months ago 25
@slopedude3 i just clapped for you man
2pacAmazesSuperman 2 months ago
@slopedude3 You know you've made it when your playing turns gay men on. Well done Martha, well done.
mmoynan 2 months ago 25
She's been doing it for decades... trust me : )
misterbrucie 1 month ago
@slopedude3 I'm gay too, but that doesn't stop me from saying Martha is probably one of the most gorgeous women out there, even in her age today.
OriginalBasaliskos 3 weeks ago
@slopedude3 Yeah, no one is THAT gay.
FDanisPianoPlayer 1 week ago
@FDanisPianoPlayer idk im pretty damn gay lol hahahahahaha
slopedude3 1 week ago
@slopedude3 No, no and no! To be gay is a gift from God/Supreme Spirit/Life. Dear Martha, don't change the sexual orientations of people.
IntelRyMSACorporatio 4 days ago
its fuckin insanee!
FlavourEd88 2 months ago
martha is waaaaaaaaaay better than lang lang ever will be at this rate
2pacAmazesSuperman 2 months ago 3
Bad playing. Argerich just doesn't get dynamics...
Dan474834 2 months ago
@Dan474834 What a stupid and gratuitous comment !
Argerich is notably famous for her wide range of dynamics and beautiful sound.
Buy a better Hi-Fi system, or wash your ears.
rigel48 2 months ago 6
Stupid..........Argerich is the best....
jorgeandresossa 2 months ago
Shit pants
DeadHappyFilm 3 months ago
I think it is a fairly good performance, she was still young and I believe still had to mature a bit more in order to play Liszt. Doesn't feel epic but still is a just but a drop of water in a gigantic career.
larodmusic 3 months ago
...she sounds like a young girl playing Liszt, which is not a natural thing, because for Liszt you need a pair of balls as the standard issue equipment on you at the outset...but, well, being Martha, not just anybody, she makes it...shows certain "school-conservatory" feel in this, i.e. sounds "touchingly naive", not machine-jaded like a lot of those people nowadays...
fredericfranc 3 months ago
@fredericfranc
you're totally right about that "toughingly naive". i sensed something about her playing, and now i realised it was that.
XxRKZRBJxX 2 months ago
She's perfect!!
jorgeoscar1000 3 months ago
UPDATE: SCHUMANN CONCERTO CANCELLED DUE TO INDISPOSITION OF ARGERICH. NIKOLAI LUGANSKY WILL REPLACE HER WITH BEETHOVEN 4TH PIANO CONCERTO
he isnt a sub for argerich he is actually better =)
mrmonkeybuns 3 months ago
oh my golly holly doll !
sparklnkitty 3 months ago
Amazing!!! Now, I have to say, my favorite version is Horowitz's on his Homage to Liszt album, acknowledging that, in the spirit of Liszt playfulness and improvisation, Horowitz took some liberties with the music-as-written. But this is an amazing fantastic version. I loved it. Thank you so much for posting this video, mmoynen!! Also, Martha was extremely lovely back in the mid 60's. Yowsa!
leopoldmozart 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the bass is too soft and not...bursting out like lang lang always play....
i just listened to lang lang's verison, and this one is kinda...boring...
TheDardanius 3 months ago
@TheDardanius Everything tastes plain after you've had a glass of sour milk. :)
mmoynan 3 months ago 125
@mmoynan Well said!
odmoa 1 month ago
@mmoynan yeah seriously who actually likes Lang Lang
haidisemirychan 1 week ago
@TheDardanius never ever thought I'd hear Argerich described as "boring"...
vocalpianist 3 months ago
@TheDardanius
Keep in mind this could be a side effect of the sound quality or even an effect of attempting to remaster the sound.
Jaydoggy531 3 months ago
@TheDardanius are you serious?
chipncharge94 2 months ago
@chipncharge94 well a bit
i do not say this is bad
TheDardanius 2 months ago
@TheDardanius but boring? wierd taste...
chipncharge94 2 months ago
@TheDardanius Her bass isn't soft. It's just right. Cziffra, Lang Lang and the others thunder out the bass in this piece too much and muddle everything up.
OriginalBasaliskos 3 weeks ago
@OriginalBasaliskos Please, never name that brat and the great hero Cziffra in one sentence again. I know you did not mean any harm, but still. Please.
Tu16 3 weeks ago
@TheDardanius youve gotta be kidding me
deano2340 3 weeks ago
Great video and perfect performance
JohnRift 3 months ago
WOOOOOOOOOOW
kenjiiiable 3 months ago
Watch Cziffra !
lego10123 3 months ago 4
@lego10123 omg yes!
TallJanisMalicious 3 months ago
She must have set an all-time world record with the speed at which she plays these octaves. She outdoes herself here compared to her performance of this rhapsody for Deutch Grammophon in 1966.
advir1021 3 months ago
When i first heard the DG record of her HR6 it chonge my life....there was the incarnation of natural forces, animal magnetism and mysterious simplicity....everyone else sounded...pedestrian afterwards. To see this and experience again Martha's astonishing qualities, which she herself doesn't even understand, is marvellous. Whatever faults anyone likes to look for, this is unequalled anywhere; like an earthquake, there is no disputing the matter. A Force of Nature.Don't try to understand!
NOSEhow2LIV 4 months ago
WOOOOOW un niveau vraiment impressionant et qui demande normement de concentration et de techniques bravo!!
bardia07 4 months ago
pirotecnico
ppaolo2000 4 months ago
wonderful...and she was so pretty...
davdav0105 4 months ago
@davdav0105 Still is. :D
therealnikachu 4 months ago
Quel incroyable génie! J'étais tellement impatient de l écouter, merci pour ce bijou!! (une des plus grand pianiste du 20ème siècle.
zsofija1970 4 months ago
she was pretty
filigold 4 months ago
Superbe
ForsakenRainMan527 4 months ago
Why doesn't she come to Mexico sometime. I was born in the wrong country :(
KegPatcha 5 months ago
@pupulique Mezzo Forte is different to every pianist. There is no 'one' Mezzo Forte.
JairCrawford 5 months ago
superwoman
LeakyWicks 5 months ago
wow!
jubulalau 5 months ago
@pupulique
I did not say that Horowitz has slow octaves. I am not so stupid! I just said that in THIS rhapsody he takes the octaves quite slowly at the beginning in order to have a great speed contrast in the final presto.
Of course he has a formidable octave technique (Tchaikovsky 1st PC !) and I am a great fan of him.
Concerning the Rach3, his version with Barbirolli is probably the fastest of all. But Argerich's is my favourite and to say that she plays at most mezzo forte is ludicrous !
rigel48 5 months ago
She's amazing! Her playing was glorious!
ThePianoguy89 5 months ago
In 1966 Martha Argerich perfomed the best version of Hungarian Rhapsody No. 6 of all times, so since then I don't even bother looking for other version. It's perfect.
brunopiccinin 5 months ago
@passeddy Sorry to tell you but you are wrong. In a scale of the planet Horowitz she doesn't even exist.
pupulique 5 months ago
@pupulique I wouldn't go as far to say that, but in this piece and others, I do feel he is ahead of our dearest Martha. :)
mmoynan 5 months ago
well, that's better :) but as soon as i get responds so quickly i wanna ask: what the hell u, so many people, r doing here? go listen 2 the great ones: Richter (i just wachted today his 119th opus, unbelievable), Rachmaninoff, Gilels. stop wasting yr time on empty, fingering players, also good, but without any intention, idea or imagination. those guys were immortal artists, who were burning themselves on stage, making history. what do yr favorites do? finger job, 'n not a good one, i must tell
pupulique 5 months ago
@pupulique or maybe stop wasting your time telling people what to like. :)
RH98 5 months ago
Greatest pianist of 20th century, no doubt.
magnuscroify 6 months ago
fantastico suono e fantastica interpretazione martha argerich rules
stebarbieri 6 months ago
wtffffff that last 3 min was insane...
meagamon490 6 months ago
Such incomparable virtuosity!
Harry E W Smth, E.D., A.D.M.
hsmith1932 6 months ago
she forced the tempo so much so she couldn't play the ending. her octaves died already in the left hand.
hooroowiiiiitz!!! that's the real rhapsody.
pupulique 6 months ago
@pupulique I think her octaves were quite strong, actually. The thing that really makes this shine to me is her beautiful style and technique.
cloudbreath9 6 months ago
@pupulique You say anything. Her octaves are perfect from the beginning to the end.
Concerning Horowitz he pounds along the octaves so slowly in this rhapsody that he has no difficulty to accelerate at the end.
rigel48 5 months ago
@rigel48 If your ears can't hear her problems in the ending, please, play Horowitz again and compare HIS devastating power in both hands to her mosquito-like sound. And do me a favor do not tell anybody anymore that the King of octaves has slow octaves, that was really funny.
By the way, her Rachmaninoff 3rd is also fastest, but, at the same time, the softest, has been played at most on mezzo forte.
pupulique 5 months ago
@pupulique Ha you only can't believe your ears. Horowitz is playing very well and Richter too, but Argerich has this unbelievable power and her interpretations are very modern, maybe to modern for your old fashioned ears? Listen to her Gaspard or her Ravel concierto, even her Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff are better then these of the big romanciers like Horowitz and Richter were. Maybe you have a problem with accepting a woman under the best pianists in the world.
bdjmbl17 4 months ago
To call Richter a romantic explains a lot to me. Beethoven, probably, is also an old fashioned for you. It doesn't surprise me that there are mostly arrogants posting on channels like this one. People who listen to the names I mentioned don't have problems. Because they know what is music about, and they understand what they hear. Martha is fine for our time, no doubt, but isn't an interpreter at all in a meaning to use for the greatest pianists of the century.
pupulique 4 months ago
@pupulique What a pretentious man you are ! YOU know what is real greatness, and people who like Argerich are only tasteless ! Maybe you do not know that Horowitz, Rubinstein, Arrau, Kempff, Gilels, to name just 5 great names, praised highly Martha Argerich. I suppose that they knew what they were taking about !
rigel48 4 months ago 2
@bdjmbl17 and it's CONCERTO, every child knows it. Before to recommend what I should listen, learn elementary music words, don't embarrass yourself, and Martha, who might have such backwoodsmen for her support. However, I'm not surprised that people like you can't realize a real greatness. It's not for you.
pupulique 4 months ago
@pupulique Concierto is Spanish. Concerto is Italian. Please respect others.
mmoynan 4 months ago
@mmoynan Concerto is an international term. You didn't write in Spanish.
pupulique 4 months ago
@pupulique Actually, that's just the Italian version of the word. Concierto is, in fact, the spanish version of the word. There are various related words: conserto, consent, concert, etc. from different languages which mean the same thing: In agreement. A simple internet search might lead you to the Britannica Academic Online encyclopedia, from which you may read an entire history of the origin of the term. Please take the time to educate yourself and avoid further embarassment. Good day
masterexploder83 4 months ago
Comment removed
bdjmbl17 3 months ago
@bdjmbl17 Guitar? Oh, c'mon, you gotta be kidding. I wonder why it's not funny to you to tell me this instead of being so angry in your post? Why did you get me so busy with you then? I studied in very good places but I don't think you are aware of them. Sorry, but I'm really tired of you, can you leave me alone? I too much respect German music to discuss bullshit with you. I know about it more than you can even imagine. I wish you all the best with your guitar.
pupulique 3 months ago
@bdjmbl17 whatever you said, I agree with.
Canttakeit1111 1 month ago
The best version ever.
thank you Ms. Argerich!!!!
......and Liszt of course :)
bosendorferandVL290 6 months ago
Thank you mmoynan for uploading this piece and many more...!
arielgonnet 6 months ago
5 sordos miraron el video y pusieron "No me gusta".
Angie3869 6 months ago
Magistral Martha y es nuestra!!!!!!!
Angie3869 6 months ago
Thank you so much ! how come i didn't notice this video before ?
GillesFoufou 6 months ago
sick octave
xavierhe 6 months ago 27
Elle est tellement belle quand elle joue!
Chateaubriand26 6 months ago
I sometimes think there is something very dynamic and... urm, modern sounding about Liszt. Like at 5:14 when the bass suddenly starts to grow and cut through the mix, speeding up and driving the piece onwards. He was like the master of the bass hook in romantic piano music. It's all a bit rock and roll really lol
RH98 7 months ago
thank you for this gem :)
tomargerich66 7 months ago 5
@tomargerich66 You are most welcome! :) I suppose I have HappySweet70 to thank :)
mmoynan 7 months ago
Fantastic!
mongelful 7 months ago
What staggering genius! I was so looking forward to seeing her at the proms but she cancelled :( the greatest pianist of the 20th century.
Shanefee1770 8 months ago 3
This rare video is really a treasure~ Thank you so much for posting this!
chl91039 8 months ago
This is a wonderful video of the young Martha. She has formidable talents, both musically and technically!
msmusicmarg 8 months ago
Her hands are beautiful to watch with a technique to rival Horowitz and Rachmaninov. Argerich is a treasure.
elgar34 8 months ago
What a liveliness in this rhapsody. Her playing is so natural as if she was improvising (in the gipsy style). Not to mention the beauty of her sound (as always).
And what about her octaves ! her acceleration at the end is fantastic. Alexei Grynyuk does not play faster ! And she is so musical ! This video is a treasure.
rigel48 8 months ago
Oh no, there is a new Argerich hater!!! How boring.....
nestorar 8 months ago
@nestorar :O Where?!
RH98 8 months ago
@RH98 I deleted the comments. I don't want to have any trolling/bullsh*t comments left on my videos, because I don't wanna encourage fights. :P
mmoynan 8 months ago
@mmoynan It is really odd... always one of a small handfull of people. And always a copy/paste comment spammed on every Argerich video. So, Lisztismylove (or whoever) when you do come back to this video (which I know you will, unless you have some sort of checkLiszt) and read this comment why not address your follow up to me directly. Tell me what goes on in your head, I would love to know...
RH98 8 months ago
@RH98 LOL CheckLiszt. Good one. :P But yeah I know, they're always the SAME people who write the SAME thing. How unoriginal. :P
mmoynan 8 months ago