This was a very great musician. Sincere, technically polished and so expressively musical. What a pity these old recordings were not better balanced. Often the orchestra cannot be heard, making it hard to hear the harmony behind the soloist.
He moves in the same way with great effect throughout the outer movements too. For example, in the 3rd movement where in his preparation, beginning 6:40, for his entry at 6:51 for the conclusion.
Vengerov, Bell and Hahn should stop and learn from Oistrakh here: the first two about how not to contort histrionically and unmusically; the third about the need to be moved at least somewhat by the music before putting bow to string. Perhaps to sing it a little first, to unfreeze oneself a bit.
Oistrakh is totally moved by the music here including, in a perfectly non-histrionic way, physically. A great example of this is his body movement and foot-work at 3:33 in preparation for the entry at 3:38. He really was at his prime in 1966. A few years before, I heard him play the Beethoven and Tchaikowsky concertos with same marvellous physicality and colossal authority as here. His encores were the Mozart Rondo and, finally, the slow movement from Bach's minor Concerto. I was in tears.
@cleopatra11: Please stop comparing with the word "better" cant you hear, that Oistrakh and Ferras are two different Worlds? I get as much from this as I get from Ferras, because both are into the music!
please stop arguing about Ferras and Oistrakh, enjoy their talent and soul, and praise God, Fate or Mankind for creating such geniuses. Then, enjoy also being able to appreciate this beautifulness while others are gaga-ing.
Sick of hearing about Ferras. Ferras has NOTHING of the intensity achieved here.
And critics claiming there is 'too much' vibrato should bear in mind that Oistrakh is throwing a precious bone of human contact to a crowd of 'starving dogs'. Performer and audience are communally stuck in the paranoia and fear of Soviet control and Oistrakh is not afraid of emotionally breaking through that.
Oistrakhs time is alot more laid back than Ferras but i feel like there is more emotion with Ferras, he makes it very romantic. i suggest that you guys listen to the recording that Josh Bell made, he has a very very good recording of this peice.
As good as Oistrakh is, Ferras's rendition is way closer to God, has the pathos required for such divine music. I would go as far as saying Ferras adds more to what even Sibelius himself intended.
David Oistrakh is like a "violin-God" for me. Still Ferras version of this moves me more...
Christian Ferras puts 100% of his soul into his play in the version with conductor Zubin Mehta-An all time classic performance of Sibelius Violin Concerto!
Still I bow for "Maestro Oistrakh", also splendid rendition!
Oistrakh is every bit as moving; The difference is that he is aggressive, and the tone and vibrato he pulls out of these simple sections is staggering.
Oistrakh played this better than anybody. I received the LP in 1959 via the Columbia Record Club with Ormandy conducting. It wasn't the LP I ordered. But when I heard it, I kept it. His performance is legendary. The second movement with the double stops is amazing.
Funny thing is, maybe someone can play this good, but they wouldn't have the time to say so on youtube. Lol, that person would be practicing right now.
This is about the most beautiful violin playing I've ever heard. And I'm an avid violin fan. I'm rendered speechless by its emotional, musical and technical perfection. My favorite violinist ever.
Does anyone know what exactly is going on at 3:40 - 4:07?? It sounds absolutely amazing, like nothing I've really heard before. It's like he's playing a bunch of chords at once. I love it, but I'm not a violinist so I'm not sure what he's actually doing or what it's called.
yeah, it's just chords (double-stops) but instead of changing from note to note together as is usual, the top note changes first, then the bottom note, etc. The way it's written is just two melodic lines that happen to be played together. Hope that makes sense, lol.
I stopped everything and I just listened to this whole performance. May your soul rest in peace David Oistrakh and Thank you for your God given talent to speak so eloquently to those who had/have the ear to listen.
This is one of the greatest pieces of violin music I have ever heard! The feature of Sibelius's melody, so-called "Broarding and depressing" is fully expressed. This kind of depressing is not like one in a small "chamber room"; it is on a great landscape field, in the Northern Europe, with special features of the land, the ice, the forest, and the sunshine... David Oistrakh obviously uses his brain to play this piece for every note. Particularly, at 5:03 and 5:48, the sound makes me crying!
I find your analysis apt and truly human.Thank you for putting transcendence into words! Do you think it sounds abit like the mendelssohn first mvmnt?
A powerful violin with a powerful player. A very hard thing to do on the violin is play forte with slow vibrato. When he was up on the upper chord around 2:30, he started to squeal as well as not needing to accent octaves around minute 4; this isn't a race, keeping a nice pace for such a slow and wonderful song is essential. Apart from that, this is a wonderful performance, especially performed well for such a difficult piece.
cfeAncient - you are mistaken. The violin has no chord at 2:30; from the beginning to 3:02 it's purely a melody played on the G string. Apart from that, there is absolutely no "squealing" at or around 2:30 (or anywhere else, for that matter). The accents between 4:00 and 4:10 are marked by the composer.
I don't quite understand your critique. Forte with slow vibrato?! Did you mean playing forte for longer rhythmic note value in one bow stroke? And where is the 'squealing'? Did you mean his very small error of shifting not entirely cleanly? Accenting octaves around 4 minutes...Did you mean his use of dynamics? (because I don't hear anything accented) Also, the notes are continuously changing on both the e and a strings in that passage, it's not just octaves.
He plays like no other. However, the virbato can be cut back a bit. I too have the same problem when playing slower and romantic parts and tend to whine at me. Think of it as small and thin compared to big and fat. :P Fat sound is better for more romantic and slower parts like the begining. At 3:40 is where he accents it and just smacks it out into the audience. Everyone has their down sides, and I can't begin to imagine the difficulty of this piece.
of cource he was the gratest!!it is said that he is the best sibelius performer!!! I have many video with him ,Sibelius 1rst mvt,bruhms violin concerto 1rst 2nd 3rd mvt(not the same recording which is uploaded)prokofiev and bruch also all mvt.I also have Menuhin's mendelsohn and kogan's beethoven and many other videos but there are all in DVD and I don't know how to separate( their are all one)and upload could anyone give a little help with this PLEASE????
GOD BLESS YOU FOR THIS VIDEO, GOD BLESS YOU truly, i've been looking for this vid. for ever, thank you, thx for the 3rd also, peace bro. thx again this recording is the only sibelius that makes me truly cry under oistrakh's fingers.
This was a very great musician. Sincere, technically polished and so expressively musical. What a pity these old recordings were not better balanced. Often the orchestra cannot be heard, making it hard to hear the harmony behind the soloist.
cynic150 4 months ago in playlist More videos from cleopatra11
He moves in the same way with great effect throughout the outer movements too. For example, in the 3rd movement where in his preparation, beginning 6:40, for his entry at 6:51 for the conclusion.
Vengerov, Bell and Hahn should stop and learn from Oistrakh here: the first two about how not to contort histrionically and unmusically; the third about the need to be moved at least somewhat by the music before putting bow to string. Perhaps to sing it a little first, to unfreeze oneself a bit.
michael2010now 7 months ago
Oistrakh is totally moved by the music here including, in a perfectly non-histrionic way, physically. A great example of this is his body movement and foot-work at 3:33 in preparation for the entry at 3:38. He really was at his prime in 1966. A few years before, I heard him play the Beethoven and Tchaikowsky concertos with same marvellous physicality and colossal authority as here. His encores were the Mozart Rondo and, finally, the slow movement from Bach's minor Concerto. I was in tears.
michael2010now 7 months ago 2
If I were in my car and this performance came up on the radio I think I would drive off the road from an OD of beautiful music.......
lovelife301 10 months ago
@cleopatra11: Please stop comparing with the word "better" cant you hear, that Oistrakh and Ferras are two different Worlds? I get as much from this as I get from Ferras, because both are into the music!
Sorcerer2k 1 year ago
THE BEST MOVEMENT.
IT IS SPECTACULAR.
TheEfGaRi 1 year ago
What a Master!
please stop arguing about Ferras and Oistrakh, enjoy their talent and soul, and praise God, Fate or Mankind for creating such geniuses. Then, enjoy also being able to appreciate this beautifulness while others are gaga-ing.
flyingvlad 1 year ago 8
@flyingvlad I believe you are right, You said a beautiful thing.
TheEfGaRi 1 year ago
Sick of hearing about Ferras. Ferras has NOTHING of the intensity achieved here.
And critics claiming there is 'too much' vibrato should bear in mind that Oistrakh is throwing a precious bone of human contact to a crowd of 'starving dogs'. Performer and audience are communally stuck in the paranoia and fear of Soviet control and Oistrakh is not afraid of emotionally breaking through that.
mountainenergei1 1 year ago
@mountainenergei1 Nothing in all caps? "Ferras has NOTHING of the intensity achieved here"
GraniteQuarrier 1 year ago
marsik stradivarius
TheGaetano62 1 year ago
waw
IberoCream 1 year ago
Beautiful. I have a snippet of the solo score of the beginning melody. I can email it to anyone who is interested. Just message me.
genmaximus110 1 year ago
Simply Beautiful.
eyebawl1 1 year ago
David Oistrakh's Sibelius is authentic, without artificial flavor, and that is the way it should be. After all, he reaches far greater depth.
Forest1227 1 year ago 3
Oistrakhs time is alot more laid back than Ferras but i feel like there is more emotion with Ferras, he makes it very romantic. i suggest that you guys listen to the recording that Josh Bell made, he has a very very good recording of this peice.
NateCan2 1 year ago
can i try to upload it in better qualitty?
Mnacuspia004 2 years ago
si crees poder puedes ,puto
LuisXVILostSoul 2 years ago
imbecil, hago esa pregunta con la mejor intención. Bastardo estupido.
Mnacuspia004 2 years ago
tu madre
LuisXVILostSoul 2 years ago
As good as Oistrakh is, Ferras's rendition is way closer to God, has the pathos required for such divine music. I would go as far as saying Ferras adds more to what even Sibelius himself intended.
ydraki 2 years ago
Oistrahk had =.-( amazing trills
TwelfthRoot2 2 years ago
it's not beautiful, it's perfect!
peanutmmss 2 years ago 4
is he playing a strad here??
peanutmmss 2 years ago
Oistrakh is a king, Sibelius is the God.
joebone87 2 years ago
Comment removed
joebone87 2 years ago
David Oistrakh is like a "violin-God" for me. Still Ferras version of this moves me more...
Christian Ferras puts 100% of his soul into his play in the version with conductor Zubin Mehta-An all time classic performance of Sibelius Violin Concerto!
Still I bow for "Maestro Oistrakh", also splendid rendition!
maxhansendk 2 years ago
Damn, he bows so well you can hear slight overtones throughout the entire performance.
Lukecash12 2 years ago
5:47
my heart stops.
snoopytroops 2 years ago 5
as well as mine at 6:11
zapasiewicz 2 years ago
Yeah Ferras is very moving, but Oistrakh is best.
Bushy162 2 years ago 7
Oistrakh is every bit as moving; The difference is that he is aggressive, and the tone and vibrato he pulls out of these simple sections is staggering.
Lukecash12 2 years ago 2
Yep. Ferras is very expressive, but doesn't acheive some of the things that Oistrakh acheives in this performance, for example 'SUSTAINABILITY'.
Bushy162 2 years ago 7
Oistrakh played this better than anybody. I received the LP in 1959 via the Columbia Record Club with Ormandy conducting. It wasn't the LP I ordered. But when I heard it, I kept it. His performance is legendary. The second movement with the double stops is amazing.
jrbcd 3 years ago 27
SISU
AaroPajari 3 years ago
This is the Best perform of the Sibelius Concerto
llirik777 3 years ago 21
Funny thing is, maybe someone can play this good, but they wouldn't have the time to say so on youtube. Lol, that person would be practicing right now.
Lukecash12 3 years ago 2
Ferras is number one this particular mvt.. Oistrakh fans you should check it out.
Ave88 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, that is true.
Ferras is more musical, more penetrated by the music.
Silvio823 3 years ago
ok definitely not. he is, but you can't say that he is MORE so than oistrakh. oistrakh is a god.
vintageviolinist 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
unfortunately ferras' slides are distracting for me...
evanbUnderscore88 3 years ago
This is the best of the best. NO words to describe his playing. The orchestra is doing a great job, too. Perfection.
OmarFadul 3 years ago 7
Favourite violinist ever.
Legend.
wenedka 3 years ago 9
aw man,
puts a lump in my throat every time.
wonderful 5/5
BFL0W 3 years ago 5
This is about the most beautiful violin playing I've ever heard. And I'm an avid violin fan. I'm rendered speechless by its emotional, musical and technical perfection. My favorite violinist ever.
rkapell1 3 years ago 4
Does anyone know what exactly is going on at 3:40 - 4:07?? It sounds absolutely amazing, like nothing I've really heard before. It's like he's playing a bunch of chords at once. I love it, but I'm not a violinist so I'm not sure what he's actually doing or what it's called.
khilger600 3 years ago
yeah, it's just chords (double-stops) but instead of changing from note to note together as is usual, the top note changes first, then the bottom note, etc. The way it's written is just two melodic lines that happen to be played together. Hope that makes sense, lol.
Jillywinkles12 3 years ago
Thanks! It does make sense actually, I can hear what he is doing now that you explained it.
khilger600 3 years ago
Beautiful. I just wish I knew what violin he played on. Am very curious.
goldie0800 3 years ago
I stopped everything and I just listened to this whole performance. May your soul rest in peace David Oistrakh and Thank you for your God given talent to speak so eloquently to those who had/have the ear to listen.
Neishapour 3 years ago 9
This is one of the greatest pieces of violin music I have ever heard! The feature of Sibelius's melody, so-called "Broarding and depressing" is fully expressed. This kind of depressing is not like one in a small "chamber room"; it is on a great landscape field, in the Northern Europe, with special features of the land, the ice, the forest, and the sunshine... David Oistrakh obviously uses his brain to play this piece for every note. Particularly, at 5:03 and 5:48, the sound makes me crying!
wuhanhe 3 years ago 7
I find your analysis apt and truly human.Thank you for putting transcendence into words! Do you think it sounds abit like the mendelssohn first mvmnt?
afterdaisy 3 years ago
A powerful violin with a powerful player. A very hard thing to do on the violin is play forte with slow vibrato. When he was up on the upper chord around 2:30, he started to squeal as well as not needing to accent octaves around minute 4; this isn't a race, keeping a nice pace for such a slow and wonderful song is essential. Apart from that, this is a wonderful performance, especially performed well for such a difficult piece.
cfeAncient 3 years ago
cfeAncient - you are mistaken. The violin has no chord at 2:30; from the beginning to 3:02 it's purely a melody played on the G string. Apart from that, there is absolutely no "squealing" at or around 2:30 (or anywhere else, for that matter). The accents between 4:00 and 4:10 are marked by the composer.
Mortimer123 3 years ago 5
I don't quite understand your critique. Forte with slow vibrato?! Did you mean playing forte for longer rhythmic note value in one bow stroke? And where is the 'squealing'? Did you mean his very small error of shifting not entirely cleanly? Accenting octaves around 4 minutes...Did you mean his use of dynamics? (because I don't hear anything accented) Also, the notes are continuously changing on both the e and a strings in that passage, it's not just octaves.
rwendelin 3 years ago 2
Please don't mistake my comments.
He plays like no other. However, the virbato can be cut back a bit. I too have the same problem when playing slower and romantic parts and tend to whine at me. Think of it as small and thin compared to big and fat. :P Fat sound is better for more romantic and slower parts like the begining. At 3:40 is where he accents it and just smacks it out into the audience. Everyone has their down sides, and I can't begin to imagine the difficulty of this piece.
cfeAncient 3 years ago
genious....
GilGelad 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ouch, he's pretty heavy on the vibrato at some parts. Good playing, but I don't like it.
FinaleFantasy 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
personally i think this recording has NOTHING on the ferras interpretation
esk848 4 years ago
watch his interpretation then. Oistrakh's sound is unmatched in this movement.
abburidotakaria 4 years ago 6
Wonderful is not a word for david's playing. Oistrach is playing much better than this word let us think.
Too bad he died so early.
havesome888 4 years ago 5
oh thanks, I'll have upload them by tommor afternoon :)
kotomalamitsosos 4 years ago
thanks so much... I've never seen his bruch on dvd
govibe 4 years ago
of cource he was the gratest!!it is said that he is the best sibelius performer!!! I have many video with him ,Sibelius 1rst mvt,bruhms violin concerto 1rst 2nd 3rd mvt(not the same recording which is uploaded)prokofiev and bruch also all mvt.I also have Menuhin's mendelsohn and kogan's beethoven and many other videos but there are all in DVD and I don't know how to separate( their are all one)and upload could anyone give a little help with this PLEASE????
kotomalamitsosos 4 years ago
quite possibly the best performance of this piece... Soo colorful and filled with emotion
govibe 4 years ago 2
i love this concerto so much! dont know which is the best mvt..
jkbs123 4 years ago
Like Ali he was the greatest!
gerryrains 4 years ago
Please post the 1st movement of this wonderfully interpreted piece, the suspense is strangling me!
cello4ever 4 years ago
No words, absolutely shocking, awesome, amazing, brilliant, deep, emotive....etc....etc....etc...
KoganSvetlanov 4 years ago
GOD BLESS YOU FOR THIS VIDEO, GOD BLESS YOU truly, i've been looking for this vid. for ever, thank you, thx for the 3rd also, peace bro. thx again this recording is the only sibelius that makes me truly cry under oistrakh's fingers.
typicalmusiclover 4 years ago
great to have a video of oistrakh on this fabulous concerto... can't seem to find the first mvt
bluespigot 4 years ago