doesnt look like the year 1901.. looks more like the year 1915- 1919.. the reason why because how these people where dressed up alittle more modem to what it used to be as a fact in 1901. also its interesting how people there didnt say (wow look at that strange men with a strange camera) looks like and feels like a men with a camera wasnt new at all out there on the streets... But the 1898 london one people stared at the camera like they never seen a camera before. Not this one?
doesnt look like the year 1901.. looks more like the year 1915- 1919.. the reason why because how these people where dressed up alittle more modem to what it used to be as a fact in 1901. also its interesting how people there didnt say (wow look at that strange men with a strange camera) looks like and feels like a men with a camera wasnt new at all out there on the streets... But the 1898 london one people stared at the camera like they never seen a camera before. Not this one?
VOXS2 6 months ago
I imagine the guy in the stockings never got deep vein thrombosis.
Otherwise Transvestites in them days had a lot to learn.:)
crewzaa 10 months ago
Comment removed
crewzaa 10 months ago
Really nice piece of work - well done BFI
goinghomesomeday1 1 year ago
silly people, that's light-colored silk bike shorts with dark cuffs.
jfsabl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The truth about the Mitchell and Kenyon Film find is incorrect you can find the full facts at the Gregory Audio Visual Website under "News Tab"
magicmomentsvideo 2 years ago
whos the guy in STOCKINGS!? so unexpected!
ar2022 3 years ago
a real disturbing sight on 41 secs, the chap in the straw boater wearing the stockings but I doubt many would have raised an eyebrow back then
VirgLondon 3 years ago
HaHa. Whats that all about?
fordtippexagain 3 years ago